Ovarian response and embryo ploidy following oral micronized progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol. A prospective study with repeated ovarian stimulation cycles.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there any difference in ovarian response and embryo ploidy following progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) using micronized progesterone or GnRH antagonist protocol? SUMMARY ANSWER: Pituitary downregulation with micronized progesterone as PPOS results in higher number of oocytes retrieved and a comparable number of euploid blastocysts to a GnRH antagonist protocol. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Although the GnRH antagonist is considered by most the gold standard protocol for controlling the LH surge during ovarian stimulation (OS) for IVF/ICSI, PPOS protocols are being increasingly used in freeze-all protocols. Still, despite the promising results of PPOS protocols, an early randomized trial reported potentially lower live births in recipients of oocytes resulting following downregulation with medroxyprogesterone acetate as compared with a GnRH antagonist protocol. The scope of the current prospective study was to investigate whether PPOS with micronized progesterone results in an equivalent yield of euploid blastocysts to a GnRH antagonist protocol. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In this prospective study, performed between September 2019 to January 2022, 44 women underwent two consecutive OS protocols within a period of 6 months in a GnRH antagonist protocol or in a PPOS protocol with oral micronized progesterone. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Overall, 44 women underwent two OS cycles with an identical fixed dose of rFSH (225 or 300 IU) in both cycles. Downregulation in the first cycles was performed with the use of a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol (0.25 mg per day as soon as one follicle of 14 mm) and consecutively, after a washout period of 1 month, control of LH surge was performed with 200 mg of oral micronized progesterone from stimulation Day 1. After the completion of both cycles, all generated blastocysts underwent genetic analysis for aneuploidy screening (preimplantation genetic testing for aneuplody, PGT-A). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Comparisons between protocols did not reveal differences between the duration of OS. The hormonal profile on the day of trigger revealed statistically significant differences between protocols in all the tested hormones except for FSH: with significantly higher serum E2 levels, more elevated LH levels and higher progesterone levels in PPOS cycles as compared with antagonist cycles, respectively. Compared with the GnRH antagonist protocol, the PPOS protocol resulted in a significantly higher number of oocytes (12.7 ± 8.09 versus 10.3 ± 5.84; difference between means [DBM] -2.4 [95% CI -4.1 to -0.73]), metaphase II (9.1 ± 6.12 versus 7.3 ± 4.15; DBM -1.8 [95% CI -3.1 to -0.43]), and 2 pronuclei (7.1 ± 4.99 versus 5.7 ± 3.35; DBM -1.5 [95% CI -2.6.1 to -0.32]), respectively. Nevertheless, no differences were observed regarding the mean number of blastocysts between the PPOS and GnRH antagonist protocols (2.9 ± 2.11 versus 2.8 ± 2.12; DBM -0.07 [95% CI -0.67 to 0.53]) and the mean number of biopsied blastocysts (2.9 ± 2.16 versus 2.9 ± 2.15; DBM -0.07 [95% CI -0.70 to 0.56]), respectively. Concerning the euploidy rates per biopsied embryo, a 29% [95% CI 21.8-38.1%] and a 35% [95% CI 26.6-43.9%] were noticed in the PPOS and antagonist groups, respectively. Finally, no difference was observed for the primary outcome, with a mean number of euploid embryos of 0.86 ± 0.90 versus 1.00 ± 1.12 for the comparison of PPOS versus GnRh antagonist. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study was powered to detect differences in the mean number of euploid embryos and not in terms of pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, per protocol, there was no randomization, the first cycle was always a GnRH antagonist cycle and the second a PPOS with 1 month of washout period in between. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In case of a freeze-all protocol, clinicians may safely consider oral micronized progesterone to control the LH surge and patients could benefit from the advantages of a medication of oral administration, with a potentially higher number of oocytes retrieved at a lower cost, without any compromise in embryo ploidy rates. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research was supported by an unrestricted grant from Theramex. N.P.P. has received Research grants from Merck Serono, Organon, Ferring Pharmaceutical, Roche, Theramex, IBSA, Gedeon Richter, and Besins Healthcare; honoraria for lectures from: Merck Serono, Organon, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Besins International, Roche Diagnostics, IBSA, Theramex, and Gedeon Richter; consulting fees from Merck Serono, Organon, Besins Healthcare, and IBSA. M.d.M.V., F.M., and I.R. declared no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study was registered at Clinical Trials Gov. (NCT04108039).

The Impact of Parental Preconception Body Mass Index on the Outcomes of in vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer and Newborns' Outcomes.

Objective: Associations between parental pre-pregnancy BMI in IVF/ICSI fresh embryo transfer cycles and neonatal outcomes were investigated through a retrospective analysis. Methods: A retrospective analysis of Couples who underwent IVF/ICSI fresh embryo transfer 1340 cycles from January 2019 to December 2021 was conducted in the Department of Reproductive Medicine of our hospital. Based on the preconception BMI of parents, they were divided into four groups: Group A (both father and mother with BMI < 25 kg/m²), Group B (father with BMI < 25 kg/m² and mother with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²), Group C (father with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² and mother with BMI < 25 kg/m²), and Group D (both father and mother with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²). The differences in baseline characteristics, fertilization and embryo development, pregnancy outcomes, and neonatal outcomes were compared among the groups. Results: In the IVF cycles, Group A had a higher rate of normal fertilization compared to three other groups, Group A is significantly higher than Group D, with statistical significance (P < .05). In the ICSI cycles, there were no significant differences among the four groups regarding normal fertilization rate, day 3 high-quality embryo rate, blastocyst formation rate, and high blastocyst rate. Univariate and multivariate analysis results showed no significant differences in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates among the four groups. However, Group D had a significantly higher rate of preterm birth than other three groups, with statistical significance (P < .05). Conclusion: To achieve better clinical outcomes and neonatal outcomes, overweight or obese couples should lose weight before undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment.

Oral dydrogesterone versus micronized vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support: a double-blind crossover study investigating pharmacokinetics and impact on the endometrium.

STUDY QUESTION: How do plasma progesterone (P) and dydrogesterone (D) concentrations together with endometrial histology, transcriptomic signatures, and immune cell composition differ when oral dydrogesterone (O-DYD) or micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) is used for luteal phase support (LPS)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Although after O-DYD intake, even at steady-state, plasma D and 20αdihydrodydrogesterone (DHD) concentrations spiked in comparison to P concentrations, a similar endometrial signature was observed by histological and transcriptomic analysis of the endometrium. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: O-DYD for LPS has been proven to be noninferior compared to MVP in two phase III randomized controlled trials. Additionally, a combined individual participant data and aggregate data meta-analysis indicated that a higher pregnancy rate and live birth rate may be obtained in women receiving O-DYD versus MVP for LPS in fresh IVF/ICSI cycles. Little data are available on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of O-DYD versus MVP and their potential molecular differences at the level of the reproductive organs, particularly at the endometrial level. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Thirty oocyte donors were planned to undergo two ovarian stimulation (OS) cycles with dual triggering (1.000 IU hCG + 0.2 mg triptorelin), each followed by 1 week of LPS: O-DYD or MVP, in a randomized, cross-over, double-blind, double-dummy fashion. On both the first and eighth days of LPS, serial blood samples upon first dosing were harvested for plasma D, DHD, and P concentration analyses. On Day 8 of LPS, an endometrial biopsy was collected for histologic examination, transcriptomics, and immune cell analysis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All oocyte donors were <35 years old, had regular menstrual cycles, no intrauterine contraceptive device, anti-Müllerian hormone within normal range and a BMI ≤29 kg/m2. OS was performed on a GnRH antagonist protocol followed by dual triggering (1.000 IU hCG + 0.2 mg triptorelin) as soon as ≥3 follicles of 20 mm were present. Following oocyte retrieval, subjects initiated LPS consisting of MVP 200 mg or O-DYD 10 mg, both three times daily. D, DHD, and P plasma levels were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Histological assessment was carried out using the Noyes criteria. Endometrial RNA-sequencing was performed for individual biopsies and differential gene expression was analyzed. Endometrial single-cell suspensions were created followed by flow cytometry for immune cell typing. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 21 women completed the entire study protocol. Subjects and stimulation characteristics were found to be similar between groups. Following the first dose of O-DYD, the average observed maximal plasma concentrations (Cmax) for D and DHD were 2.9 and 77 ng/ml, respectively. The Cmax for D and DHD was reached after 1.5 and 1.6 h (=Tmax), respectively. On the eighth day of LPS, the first administration of that day gave rise to a Cmax of 3.6 and 88 ng/ml for D and DHD, respectively. For both, the observed Tmax was 1.5 h. Following the first dose of MVP, the Cmax for P was 16 ng/ml with a Tmax of 4.2 h. On the eighth day of LPS, the first administration of that day showed a Cmax for P of 21 ng/ml with a Tmax of 7.3 h. All 42 biopsies showed endometrium in the secretory phase. The mean cycle day was 23.9 (±1.2) in the O-DYD group versus 24.0 (±1.3) in the MVP group. RNA-sequencing did not reveal significantly differentially expressed genes between samples of both study groups. The average Euclidean distance between samples following O-DYD was significantly lower than following MVP (respectively 12.1 versus 18.8, Mann-Whitney P = 6.98e-14). Immune cell profiling showed a decrease of CD3 T-cell, γδ T-cell, and B-cell frequencies after MVP treatment compared to O-DYD, while the frequency of natural killer (NK) cells was significantly increased. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The main reason for caution is the small sample size, given the basic research nature of the project. The plasma concentrations are best estimates as this was not a formal PK study. Whole tissue bulk RNA-sequencing has been performed not correcting for bias caused by different tissue compositions across biopsies. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This is the first study comparing O-DYD/MVP, head-to-head, in a randomized design on a molecular level in IVF/ICSI. Plasma serum concentrations suggest that administration frequency is important, in addition to dose, specifically for O-DYD showing a rapid clearance. The molecular endometrial data are overall comparable and thus support the previously reported noninferior reproductive outcomes for O-DYD as compared to MVP. Further research is needed to explore the smaller intersample distance following O-DYD and the subtle changes detected in endometrial immune cells. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Not related to this work, C.Bl. has received honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing, educational events, or scientific advice from Abbott, Ferring, Organon, Cooper Surgical, Gedeon-Richter, IBSA, and Merck. H.T. has received honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing, educational events, or scientific advice from Abbott, Ferring, Cooper Surgical, Gedeon-Richter, Cook, and Goodlife. S.M. has received honoraria for lectures, presentations, educational events, or scientific advice from Abbott, Cooper Surgical, Gedeon-Richter, IBSA, and Merck and Oxolife. G.G. has received honoraria for lectures, presentations, educational events, or scientific advice from Merck, MSD, Organon, Ferring, Theramex, Gedeon-Richter, Abbott, Biosilu, ReprodWissen, Obseva, PregLem, Guerbet, Cooper, Igyxos, and OxoLife. S.V.-S. is listed as inventor on two patents (WO2019115755A1 and WO2022073973A1), which are not related to this work. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EUDRACT 2018-000105-23.

Beetroot, watermelon and ginger juice supplementation may increase the clinical outcomes of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To prove the hypothesis that beetroot, watermelon and ginger juice supplementation improves the endometrial receptivity and clinical outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. METHODS: This prospective randomized study enrolled 436 female patients undergoing ICSI cycles from January/2018 to June/2021, in a private university-affiliated IVF center. Female patients were randomized in a 1:3 ratio to either Control (n=109) or Supplementation Group (n=327). All patients received nutritional orientation before the beginning of the treatment. Participants in the Supplementation Group were instructed to intake a daily dose of homemade juice, prepared with fresh beetroot, watermelon and ginger, from the day of embryo transfer until the day of pregnancy test, while patients in Control Group did not follow the juice protocol. Generalized Linear Models, adjusted for potential confounders (female age, body mass index - BMI, endometrial thickness upon embryo transfer, and number of transferred embryos), followed by Bonferroni post hoc test for the comparison of means between groups, were used to investigate the impact of juice supplementation on the clinical outcomes of ICSI. RESULTS: Patients and cycles characteristics were equally distributed among Supplementation and Control groups. Implantation rate (25.2% vs. 20.5%, p<0.001) and clinical pregnancy rate (41.0% vs. 22.0%, p=0.039) were significantly higher in the Supplementation compared to the Control group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of beetroot, watermelon and ginger juice may be considered a promising strategy for improving clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART), without any side effects.

Androgen and inhibin B levels during ovarian stimulation before and after 8 weeks of low-dose hCG priming in women with low ovarian reserve.

STUDY QUESTION: Does 8 weeks of daily low-dose hCG administration affect androgen or inhibin B levels in serum and/or follicular fluid (FF) during the subsequent IVF/ICSI cycle in women with low ovarian reserve? SUMMARY ANSWER: Androgen levels in serum and FF, and inhibin B levels in serum, decreased following 8 weeks of hCG administration. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Recently, we showed that 8 weeks of low-dose hCG priming, in between two IVF/ICSI treatments in women with poor ovarian responder (anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) <6.29 pmol/l), resulted in more follicles of 2-5 mm and less of 6-10-mm diameter at the start of stimulation and more retrieved oocytes at oocyte retrieval. The duration of stimulation and total FSH consumption was increased in the IVF/ICSI cycle after priming. Hypothetically, hCG priming stimulates intraovarian androgen synthesis causing upregulation of FSH receptors (FSHR) on granulosa cells. It was therefore unexpected that antral follicles were smaller and the stimulation time longer after hCG priming. This might indicate a different mechanism of action than previously suggested. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Blood samples were drawn on stimulation day 1, stimulation days 5-6, trigger day, day of oocyte retrieval, and oocyte retrieval + 5 days in the IVF/ICSI cycles before and after hCG priming (the control and study cycles, respectively). FF was collected from the first aspirated follicle on both sides during oocyte retrieval in both cycles. The study was conducted as a prospective, paired, non-blinded, single-center study conducted between January 2021 and July 2021 at a tertiary care center. The 20 participants underwent two identical IVF/ICSI treatments: a control cycle including elective freezing of all blastocysts and a study cycle with fresh blastocyst transfer. The control and study cycles were separated by 8 weeks (two menstrual cycles) of hCG priming by daily injections of 260 IU recombinant hCG. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women aged 18-40 years with cycle lengths of 23-35 days and AMH <6.29 pmol/l were included. Control and study IVF/ICSI cycles were performed in a fixed GnRH-antagonist protocol. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Inhibin B was lower on stimulation day 1 after hCG priming (P = 0.05). Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) was significantly lower on stimulation day 1 (P = 0.03), and DHEAS and androstenedione were significantly lower on stimulation days 5-6 after priming (P = 0.02 and P = 0.02) The testosterone level in FF was significantly lower in the study cycle (P = 0.008), while the concentrations of inhibin B and androstenedione in the FF did not differ between the study and control cycles. A lower serum inhibin B in the study cycle corresponds with the antral follicles being significantly smaller after priming, and this probably led to a longer stimulation time in the study cycle. This contradicts the theory that hCG priming increases the intraovarian androgen level, which in turn causes more FSHR on developing (antral up to preovulatory) follicles. However, based on this study, we cannot rule out that an increased intra-follicular androgen level was present at initiation of the ovarian stimulation, without elevating the androgen level in serum and that an increased androgen level may have rescued some small antral follicles that would have otherwise undergone atresia by the end of the previous menstrual cycle. We retrieved significantly more oocytes in the Study cycle, and the production of estradiol per follicle ≥10-mm diameter on trigger day was comparable in the study and control cycles, suggesting that the rescued follicles were competent in terms of producing oocytes and steroid hormones. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The sample size was small, and the study was not randomized. Our study design did not allow for the measurement and comparison of androgen levels or FSHR expression in small antral follicles before and immediately after the hCG-priming period. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The results make us question the mechanism of action behind hCG priming prior to IVF. It is important to design a study with the puncture of small antral follicles before and immediately after priming to investigate the proposed hypothesis. Improved cycle outcomes, i.e. more retrieved oocytes, must be confirmed in a larger, preferably randomized study. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by an unrestricted grant from Gedeon Richter awarded to the institution. A.P. reports personal consulting fees from PregLem SA, Novo Nordisk A/S, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Gedeon Richter Nordics AB, Cryos International, and Merck A/S outside the submitted work and payment or honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter Nordics AB, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Merck A/S, and Theramex and Organon & Co and payment for participation in an advisory board for Preglem. Grants to the institution have been provided by Gedeon Richter Nordics AB, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, and Merck A/S, and equipment and travel support has been given to the institution by Gedeon Richter Nordics AB. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04643925.

Total fertilization failure after ICSI: insights into pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management through artificial oocyte activation.

BACKGROUND: Total fertilization failure (TFF) is the failure of all metaphase II oocytes to fertilize in ART cycles. The phenomenon represents a known cause of infertility, affecting 1-3% of ICSI cycles. Oocyte activation deficiency (OAD) is the leading cause of fertilization failure, attributed to sperm- or oocyte-related issues, although until recently little attention has been given to oocyte-related deficiencies. Different strategies for overcoming TFF have been proposed in clinical settings, mainly using artificial oocyte activation (AOA) by calcium ionophores. Typically, AOA has been blindly applied with no previous diagnosis testing and, therefore, not considering the origin of the deficiency. The scarcity of data available and the heterogeneous population subjected to AOA make it challenging to draw firm conclusions about the efficacy and safety of AOA treatments. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: TFF leads to an unexpected, premature termination of ART, which inflicts a substantial psychological and financial burden on patients. This review aims to provide a substantial update on: the pathophysiology of fertilization failure, focusing both on sperm- and oocyte-related factors; the relevance of diagnostic testing to determine the cause of OAD; and the effectiveness and safety of AOA treatments to overcome fertilization failure. SEARCH METHODS: Relevant studies were identified in the English-language literature using PubMed search terms, including fertilization failure, AOA, phospholipase C zeta (PLCζ), PLCZ1 mutations, oocyte-related factors, wee1-like protein kinase 2 (WEE2) mutations, PAT1 homolog 2 (PATL2) mutations, tubulin beta-8 chain (TUBB8) mutations, and transducin-like enhancer protein 6 (TLE6) mutations. All relevant publications until November 2022 were critically evaluated and discussed. OUTCOMES: Fertilization failure after ART has been predominantly associated with PLCζ deficiencies in sperm. The reason relates to the well-established inability of defective PLCζ to trigger the characteristic pattern of intracellular Ca2+ oscillations responsible for activating specific molecular pathways in the oocyte that lead to meiosis resumption and completion. However, oocyte deficiencies have recently emerged to play critical roles in fertilization failure. Specifically, mutations have been identified in genes such as WEE2, PATL2, TUBB8, and TLE6. Such mutations translate into altered protein synthesis that results in defective transduction of the physiological Ca2+ signal needed for maturation-promoting factor (MPF) inactivation, which is indispensable for oocyte activation. The effectiveness of AOA treatments is closely related to identifying the causal factor of fertilization failure. Various diagnostic tests have been developed to determine the cause of OAD, including heterologous and homologous tests, particle image velocimetry, immunostaining, and genetic tests. On this basis, it has been shown that conventional AOA strategies, based on inducing the calcium oscillations, are highly effective in overcoming fertilization failure caused by PLCζ-sperm deficiencies. In contrast, oocyte-related deficiencies might be successfully managed using alternative AOA promoters that induce MPF inactivation and meiosis resumption. Such agents include cycloheximide, N,N,N',N'-tetrakis(2-pyridylmethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine (TPEN), roscovitine, and WEE2 complementary RNA. In addition, when OAD is caused by oocyte dysmaturity, applying a modified ovarian stimulation protocol and trigger could improve fertilization. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: AOA treatments represent a promising therapy to overcome fertilization failure caused by sperm- and oocyte-related factors. Diagnosing the cause of fertilization failure will be essential to improve the effectiveness and safe utilization of AOA treatments. Even though most data have not shown adverse effects of AOA on pre- and post-implantation embryo development, the literature is scarce on the matter concerned and recent studies, mainly using mice, suggest that AOA might cause epigenetic alterations in the resulting embryos and offspring. Until more robust data are available, and despite the encouraging results obtained, AOA should be applied clinically judiciously and only after appropriate patient counseling. Currently, AOA should be considered an innovative treatment, not an established one.

Assisted oocyte activation does not overcome recurrent embryo developmental problems.

STUDY QUESTION: Can recurrent embryo developmental problems after ICSI be overcome by assisted oocyte activation (AOA)? SUMMARY ANSWER: AOA did not improve blastocyst formation in our patient cohort with recurrent embryo developmental problems after ICSI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The use of AOA to artificially induce calcium (Ca2+) rises by using Ca2+ ionophores (mainly calcimycin and ionomycin) has been reported as very effective in overcoming fertilization failure after ICSI, especially in patients whose Ca2+ dynamics during fertilization are deficient. However, there is only scarce and contradictory literature on the use of AOA to overcome embryo developmental problems after ICSI, and it is not clear whether abnormal Ca2+ patterns during fertilization disturb human preimplantation embryo development. Moreover, poor embryo development after ICSI has also been linked to genetic defects in the subcortical maternal complex (SCMC) genes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This prospective cohort single-center study compared ICSI-AOA cycles and previous ICSI cycles in couples with normal fertilization rates (≥60%) but impaired embryonic development (≤15% blastocyst formation) in at least two previous ICSI cycles. In total, 42 couples with embryo developmental problems were included in this study from January 2018 to January 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Of the 42 couples included, 17 underwent an ICSI-AOA cycle consisting of CaCl2 injection and double ionomycin exposure. Fertilization, blastocyst development, pregnancy, and live birth rates after ICSI-AOA were compared to previous ICSI cycles. In addition, the calcium pattern induced by the male patient's sperm was investigated by mouse oocyte calcium analysis. Furthermore, all 42 couples underwent genetic screening. Female patients were screened for SCMC genes (TLE6, PADI6, NLRP2, NLRP5, NLRP7, and KHDC3L) and male patients were screened for the sperm-oocyte-activating factor PLCZ1. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We compared 17 AOA cycles to 44 previous ICSI cycles from the same patient cohort. After AOA, a total fertilization rate of 68.95% (131/190), a blastocyst development rate of 13.74% (18/131), a pregnancy rate of 29.41% (5/17), and a live birth rate of 23.53% (4/17) were achieved, which was not different from the previous ICSI cycles (76.25% (321/421, P-value = 0.06); 9.35% (30/321, P-value = 0.18), 25.00% (11/44, P-value = 0.75), and 15.91% (7/44, P-value = 0.48), respectively). Calcium analysis showed that patient's sperm induced calcium patterns similar to control sperm samples displaying normal embryo developmental potential. Genetic screening revealed 10 unique heterozygous variants (in NLRP2, NLRP5, NLRP7, TLE6, and PADI6) of uncertain significance (VUS) in 14 females. Variant NLRP5 c.623-12_623-11insTTC (p.?) was identified in two unrelated individuals and variant NLRP2 c.1572T>C (p.Asp524=) was identified in four females. Interestingly, we identified a previously reported homozygous mutation PLCZ1, c.1499C>T (p.Ser500Leu), in a male patient displaying impaired embryonic development, but not showing typical fertilization failure. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our strict inclusion criteria, requiring at least two ICSI cycles with impaired embryo development, reduced cycle-to-cycle variability, while the requirement of a lower blastocyst development not influenced by a poor fertilization excluded couples who otherwise would be selective cases for AOA; however, these criteria limited the sample size of this study. Targeted genetic screening might be too restricted to identify a genetic cause underlying the phenotype of poor embryo development for all patients. Moreover, causality of the identified VUS should be further determined. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Strong evidence for AOA overcoming impaired embryonic development is still lacking in the literature. Thus far, only one article has reported a beneficial effect of AOA (using calcimycin) compared to previous ICSI cycles in this patient population, whilst two more recent sibling-oocyte control studies (one using calcimycin and the other ionomycin) and our research (using ionomycin) could not corroborate these findings. Although no major abnormalities have been found in children born after AOA, this technique should be reserved for couples with a clear Ca2+-release deficiency. Finally, genetic screening by whole-exome sequencing may reveal novel genes and variants linked to embryo developmental problems and allow the design of more personalized treatment options, such as wild-type complementary RNA or recombinant protein injection. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by the Flemish Fund for Scientific Research (grant FWO.OPR.2015.0032.01 to B.H. and grant no. 1298722N to A.B.). A.C.B., D.B., A.B., V.T., R.P., F.M., I.D.C., L.L., D.S., P.D.S., P.C., and F.V.M. have nothing to disclose. B.H. reports a research grant from the Flemish Fund for Scientific Research and reports being a board member of the Belgian Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Belgian Ethical Committee on embryo research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03354013.

Eight weeks of androgen priming by daily low-dose hCG injections before ICSI treatment in women with low ovarian reserve.

STUDY QUESTION: Does 8 weeks of continuous low-dose hCG administration increase the proportion of antral follicles that reach the preovulatory state during ovarian stimulation (OS) in women with low ovarian reserve? SUMMARY ANSWER: The proportion of antral follicles (2-10 mm) that reached the preovulatory state did not increase. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The administration of androgens prior to OS might upregulate FSH receptor (FSHR) expression on granulosa cells, making follicles more responsive to exogenous FSH stimulation during OS. LH and hCG stimulate the local follicular androgen synthesis in theca cells and may be used as an endogenous androgen priming method. Exogenous priming by testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) have been shown to increase the number of retrieved oocytes and live birth rate but the studies are small, and their use is associated with side effects. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A prospective, paired, non-blinded single-center study including 20 women serving as their own controls conducted between January 2021 and July 2021 at The University Hospital Copenhagen Rigshospitalet, Denmark. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Participants underwent two identical consecutive IVF/ICSI treatments, a Control cycle and a Study cycle, separated by ∼8 weeks (two menstrual cycles) of daily injections of 260 IU recombinant hCG (rhCG). A freeze-all strategy was applied in the Control cycle. Both IVF/ICSI cycles were performed in a fixed GnRH antagonist protocol using a daily dose of 300 IU recombinant FSH (rFSH) and GnRH antagonist 0.25 mg from stimulation days 5-6. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Follicular output rate, defined as the number of follicles >16 mm on hCG trigger day divided by the antral follicle count (2-10 mm) at baseline, did not increase after 8 weeks of hCG priming (P = 0.8). The mean number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher after the hCG priming being 4.7 (2.8) vs 3.2 (1.7) in the Study and Control cycle, respectively (P = 0.01). The duration of stimulation was longer in the Study versus the Control cycle (P = 0.05), despite the use of identical hCG trigger criterion and similar diameters of the three biggest follicles on hCG trigger day in the two cycles (P = 0.9). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The sample size was small, and the number of oocytes retrieved was not the primary endpoint. Larger studies are needed to confirm this finding. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Long-term, low-dose rhCG administration may increase the number of oocytes retrieved during IVF/ICSI in women with low ovarian reserve, but more research is needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by an unrestricted grant from Gedeon Richter. A.P. reports personal consulting fees from PregLem SA, Novo Nordisk A/S, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Gedeon Richter Nordics AB, Cryos International, and Merck A/S outside the submitted work and payment or honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter Nordics AB, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Merck A/S, and Theramex and Organon & Co. Grants to the institution have been provided by Gedeon Richter Nordics AB, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, and Merck A/S and receipt of equipment by the institution from Gedeon Richter Nordics AB is reported. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04643925.

Letrozole Supplementation and the Increased Risk of Elevated Progesterone Levels on Trigger Day.

Although using letrozole (LE) during in vitro fertilisation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) has many advantages, it remains unclear whether LE induces an increase in progestogen during the late follicular phase. The objective of this study was to investigate whether progesterone levels increased under antagonist protocols supplemented with LE on the trigger day using a retrospective cohort study. The study included 1,133 women who underwent IVF/ICSI cycles from January 2018 to June 2020. After propensity score matching (PSM) for baseline characteristics, 266 patients with gonadotropin-releasing hormone-antagonist (GnRH-ant) were matched to 266 patients with letrozole + GnRH-ant (LE GnRH-ant) (PSM 1 cohort), and 283 patients with gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonist (GnRH-a) were matched to 283 patients with LE GnRH-ant (PSM 2 cohort). In the PSM 1 cohort, patients in the LE GnRH-a group presented higher progesterone levels (1.22 ± 0.95 ng/mL vs 0.86 ± 0.60 ng/mL, P < 0.001), with a higher proportion of patients with progesterone level > 1.5 ng/mL (24.81% vs 7.52%, P < 0.001). In PSM 2 cohort, patients in the LE GnRH-a group presented higher progesterone levels on trigger day (1.23 ± 0.91 ng/mL vs 0.98 ± 0.61 ng/mL, P < 0.001), with a higher proportion of patients with progesterone level > 1.5 ng/mL (25.45% vs 12.70%, P < 0.001). In the PSM 1 cohort, progesterone levels on the trigger day increased by 0.05 ng/mL, with an increase in every retrieved oocyte in the LE GnRH-ant group (ß 0.05 ng/mL [95% CI 0.04, 0.06], P < 0.001), whereas an increase of 0.02 ng/mL was observed in the GnRH-ant group (ß 0.02 ng/mL [95% CI 0.01, 0.03], P < 0.001), with P for interaction being 0.0018. In the PSM 2 cohort, progesterone levels on the trigger day increased by 0.05 ng/mL with an increase in every retrieved oocyte in the LE GnRH-ant group (ß 0.05 ng/mL [95% CI 0.04, 0.06], P < 0.001), whereas an increase of 0.02 ng/mL was observed in the GnRH-a group (ß 0.02 ng/mL [95% CI 0.01, 0.03], P < 0.001), with P for interaction being 0.0002. LE supplementation on the antagonist protocols may increase progesterone levels in the late follicular stage.

Reproductive outcomes of dual trigger with combination GnRH agonist and hCG versus trigger with hCG alone in women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching.

BACKGROUND: Despite a large number of studies on the selection of trigger drugs, it remains unclear whether the dual trigger with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, compared to the trigger with hCG alone, can improve the reproductive outcome of patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the laboratory and clinical outcomes of dual trigger versus single trigger. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 520 in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles between July 2014 and September 2020 at the Reproductive and Genetic Center of Integrative Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. All patients underwent IVF/ICSI treatment with fresh embryo transfer using the GnRH antagonist protocol. We used propensity score matching to control for confounding variables and binary logistic regression analysis to determine the correlations between trigger methods and pregnancy outcomes. After propensity score matching, 57 cycles from each group were evaluated and compared for laboratory or clinical outcomes in this retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the number of oocytes retrieved, embryos available, top-quality embryos, or the rate of normal fertilization between the dual-trigger and single-trigger protocols, respectively. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate, and live birth rate were also similar between the two groups, while the miscarriage rate (37.0% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.045) was higher in the dual-trigger than the single-trigger group. Subsequent binary logistic regression analysis showed that age was a remarkably significant independent predictor of both clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio = 0.90, 95% confidence interval: 0.84-0.97, p = 0.006) and live birth rate (odds ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.82-0.97, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, dual-trigger for final oocyte maturation might increase miscarriage rate, but in terms of the laboratory and other pregnancy outcomes such as clinical pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate or live birth rate, there was no evidence to show that dual trigger was superior to an hCG-trigger alone for patients undergoing GnRH-antagonist cycles with fresh embryo transfer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

Oocytes of women who are obese or overweight have lower levels of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids compared with oocytes of women with normal weight.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether the oocytes of women who are obese or overweight have a different fatty acid (FA) profile than women with normal weight. DESIGN: Prospective case-control study. SETTING: Two IVF centers. PATIENT(S): A total of 205 women undergoing IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were included in the study, totaling 922 oocytes. INTERVENTION(S): The unfertilized and the immature oocytes from the women who underwent IVF/ICSI were subjected to FA analysis with capillary gas chromatography. Women were classified according their body mass index (BMI) as normal, overweight, or obese. Germinal vesicle oocytes, metaphase I oocytes, and unfertilized metaphase II oocytes were analyzed separately. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fatty acid profile. RESULT(S): A very different oocyte FA pattern was observed for each BMI. Women with normal weight had higher levels of saturated FAs, and lower levels of monosaturated FAs. Women who were obese had lower levels of n-3 polyunsaturated FA, and the lowest n-6:n-3 ratios. Regarding specific FAs, docosahexaenoic acid levels were lower in women with normal weight than in those who are overweight, and in women who are overweight than in those who are obese. The opposite occurred with eicosapentaenoic acid, with the highest levels in women who have normal weight followed by those who are overweight and lower levels in those women who were obese. When FA analysis was restricted to a subset of oocytes, many of these differences persisted. CONCLUSION(S): Our study shows that oocytes from women who are obese or overweight have a different FA composition. This difference in levels could be related to the IVF poor outcome in these women. Therefore, this different composition could suggest that offspring of women who are obese or overweight have an unfavorable milieu even before conception.

Effect of myo-inositol supplementation on ICSI outcomes among poor ovarian responder patients: A randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: This study has evaluated the use of myo-inositol supplementation for improving reproductive outcomes in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). METHODS: One hundred and twelve poor responder patients were included in the study and randomly categorized into two groups using a permuted block randomization method. Group A included 56 patients who received myo-inositol (4 g) and folic acid (400 µg) daily from one month before starting the ICSI cycle continuing until the ovulation triggering day. Group B included 56 patients consuming only folic acid (400 µg) daily for the same period. The outcome measures were the number of retrieved oocytes, embryo quality, Ovarian Sensitivity Index (OSI: number of oocytes retrieved/total Gonadotropins units × 1000), fertilization, implantation, and ongoing pregnancy rates. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the total dose of gonadotropin used, OSI, and the number of total retrieved and mature oocytes. Grad A embryos and fertilization rate were significantly increased in group A. Implantation and pregnancy rates showed statistically insignificant changes. CONCLUSION: Treatment of poor responders with myo-inositol from one month before starting ICSI cycle continuing until ovulation trigger can improve fertilization rate and embryo quality, and may enhance the cumulative pregnancy rate in poor responders.

Intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet-rich plasma in women undergoing assisted reproduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Prior studies have provided conflicting results regarding the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic injection (ICSI). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the intrauterine infusion of PRP on the outcome of embryo transfer (ET) in women undergoing IVF/ICSI. We searched databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL). Meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed to calculate the pooled estimates. Seven studies involving 625 patients (311 cases and 314 controls) were included. The probability of chemical pregnancy (n = 3, risk ratio (RR): 1.79, 95 % confidence intervals (CI): 1.29, 2.50; P < 0.001, I2 = 0 %), clinical pregnancy (n = 7, RR: 1.79, 95 % CI: 1.37, 2.32; P < 0.001, I2 = 16 %), and implantation rate (n = 3, RR: 1.97, 95 % CI: 1.40, 2.79; P < 0.001, I2 = 0 %) was significantly higher in women who received PRP compared with control. There was no difference between women who received PRP compared with control group regarding miscarriage (RR: 0.72, 95 % CI: 0.27, 1.93; P = 0.51, I2 = 0 %). Following the intervention, endometrial thickness increased in women who received PRP compared to control group (SMD: 1.79, 95 % CI: 1.13, 2.44; P < 0.001, I2 = 64 %). The findings of this systematic review suggest that PRP is an alternative treatment strategy in patients with thin endometrium and recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Further prospective, large, and high quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to identify the subpopulation that would most benefit from PRP.

Effect of empiric intravenous intralipid therapy on pregnancy outcome in women with unexplained recurrent implantation failure undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycle: a randomized controlled trial.

To evaluate the effect of empiric intralipid infusion therapy on pregnancy outcomes for patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failure (RIF) undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A total of 142 patients with a history of unexplained RIF (3 or more cycles) were included in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized into two groups, study group (n = 71) and control group (n = 71). The study group received intralipid 20% infusion on the day of embryo transfer (ET) and a second dose on the day of pregnancy test. The clinical pregnancy rate in the study group was 36.6% (n = 26) compared to 28.2% (n = 20) in the control group (OR 1.47, CI 0.72-2.98, p = .282). The live birth rate in the study group was 18.3% (n = 13) and 14.1% (n = 10) in the control group (OR 1.37, CI 0.55-3.36, p=.49). No side effects of intralipid therapy were reported in the study period. There was improvement in the pregnancy rate among women with unexplained RIF who received empiric intralipid infusion therapy; however, this improvement did not reach statistical significance.

The effect of administration of intravenous intralipid on pregnancy outcomes in women with implantation failure after IVF/ICSI with non-donor oocytes: A randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Does the administration of intravenous intralipid in women with previous implantation failure at the time of embryo transfer improve pregnancy outcomes in terms of biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and ongoing pregnancy rate? STUDY DESIGN: This was a single blinded randomised controlled trial of 105 subjects with previous failed IVF undergoing self donor oocyte IVF/ICSI from January 2017 to May 2018. Randomisation was by computer generated sequence after oocyte pickup. Results were analysed for 102 women, excluding three women due to poor embryo quality. Women in the study arm(n = 52) received 2 doses of 20% intravenous intralipid (Fresenius Kabi), 4 ml diluted in 250 ml normal saline by slow infusion. The first dose was given immediately after oocyte recovery, and the second dose was given on the day of embryo transfer, 1 h prior to the transfer. The control group (n = 50) received normal saline. Flexible ovarian stimulation protocols were used. All the women received routine luteal phase support with micronised vaginal progesterone. RESULTS: 102 women underwent analysis, 52 in the study group and 50 in control group. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics. There was a significant difference in the biochemical pregnancy rate in the intralipid group (40.38%) versus control (16%) [(p = 0.006), RR = 2.5 (1.23-5.16 CI)], clinical pregnancy rate [(34.62% vs 14%), p = 0.006, RR = 2.5(1.13-5.40 CI)], implantation rate [(16.6% vs 6.6%), p = 0.012, RR = 2.5(1.18 to 5.41 CI)], and take home baby rate [28.8% vs 10%, p = 0.024, RR = 2.8(1.1-7.3)]. The adjusted odds ratio for clinical pregnancy in women who received intralipid vs placebo was 3.1 (1.02-9.70 95% CI), p = 0.046. No adverse effects of intralipid were observed. CONCLUSION: This study shows a statistically significant increase in implantation rate and live birth rate in women who receive intravenous intralipid with prior implantation failure after IVF/ICSI. These findings concur with other studies; however, literature is limited. The effect of intralipid on the immunological abnormalities in women who experience recurrent implantation failure needs to be investigated further.

Growth hormone supplementation may improve the pregnancy rate and endometrial receptivity among women aged more than 40 years undergoing in vitro fertilization.

BACKGROUND: Growth hormone (GH) supplements have been shown to improve pregnancy and live-birth rates, suggesting that GH has a beneficial effect on oocyte quality. However, the effects of GH on implantation and receptivity remain unknown. This study evaluated the efficacy of GH in women aged more than 40 years participating in assisted reproductive technology (ART) programs. METHODS: Cycles of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) in women aged more than 40 years (range, 40-43 years) between January 2009 and March 2014 at a university-based reproductive center were reviewed. Women were divided into two groups, those with and without GH co-stimulation. ART outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Supplement of GH significantly lowered cycle cancellation rate by increasing the per cycle rates of harvesting at least one oocyte and transferring at least one embryo (80.2% vs. 69.4%). GH increased the per cycle clinical pregnancy (15.9% vs. 6.8%) and favorable ultrasonic endometrial pattern (60.9% vs. 39.3%) rates. GH also increased the per transfer clinical pregnancy (19.9% vs. 9.9%) and implantation (11.2% vs. 5.2%) rates and the rate of a favorable ultrasonic endometrial pattern (65.1% vs. 45.0%). CONCLUSION: GH supplementation reduces the cycle cancellation rate in women aged more than 40 years, and increases the favorable ultrasonic endometrial pattern, pregnancy, and implantation rates by its beneficial actions on embryo quality and endometrial receptivity.

Dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology with poor ovarian response. A prospective case-control study.

Objective The effects of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation in Saudi Arabian women with poor ovarian response (POR) is presently unknown. The present study aimed to assess the benefits of DHEA supplementation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Methods This was a prospective case-control study involving 62 women who were diagnosed with POR and underwent IVF/ICSI between January 2012 and June 2016. The positive influence of DHEA in 34 women, compared with 28 women without supplementation, was defined as improvements in the number of oocytes retrieved, the fertilization rate, the number of grade I embryos generated and the pregnancy rate. Results Both groups were evenly matched for age, body mass index and laboratory test parameters. There were statistically significant differences between the groups with and without DHEA supplementation for oocyte yield (6.35 ± 2.41 versus 3.98 ± 3.2), Grade I embryos generated (55% versus 30%), positive pregnancy rate (21/34 versus 10/28), and live birth rate (18/34 versus 4/28). Conclusion DHEA supplementation in women with POR had a positive effect on hormonal profiles, the quality of the endometrium, the number of oocytes retrieved, the quality of embryos, and the pregnancy and live birth rates.

Physiological Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (PICSI) outcomes after oral pretreatment and semen incubation with myo-inositol in oligoasthenoteratozoospermic men: results from a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of an oral pretreatment with a mix of myo-inositol (Myo-Ins), folic acid, vitamin E, L-carnitine, L-arginine and selenium (Folandrol, Exeltis, Hungary) and subsequent direct Myo-Ins incubation of spermatozoa before Physiological Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (PICSI) procedures in infertile couples due to oligoasthenoteratozoospermia with previous failed PICSI procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized controlled trial at the Assisted Reproduction Unit of the Kaáli Institute (Gyor, Hungary). The male partners were randomly assigned to two groups: the first one treated with a myo-Inositol-based supplement (Folandrol®, Exeltis, Hungary) for two months; the second one did not undergo any treatment in the same time range (controls). The semen of the treated group was incubated for 2 h with 2 mg/ml of MI (Andrositol Lab, Lo.Li. Pharma, Rome, Italy) for the PICSI protocol. RESULTS: There was no significant difference for mean female partner age (p = 0.17) and mean previous failed PICSI procedures (p = 0.65) between the two groups. Although there was no significant difference (p = 0.85) regarding the rate of mature oocytes and the fertilization index was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the treatment group than control group. Also, despite the comparable average number of transferred embryos between the two groups (p = 0.55), in the treatment group there was a significantly higher rate of good quality embryos at day 3 after fertilization (p = 0.001). Finally, 11 pregnancies were obtained only in the treatment group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of oral supplementation and semen incubation with MI in oligoasthenoteratozoospermic men could improve PICSI outcomes.

Improvement in Sperm Parameters With Traditional Iranian Remedy: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic male infertility is a global problem with almost no definite medicinal treatment. Most patients have to go through intrauterine insemination or assisted reproductive technology for achieving fertility. Unfortunately, success rates are low in cases with very low sperm count. Therefore it seems that improvement in sperm quality can have beneficial effects on assisted reproductive technology outcome. CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old man with history of infertility for 6 years was referred to the traditional medicine clinic with a recurrent unsuccessful intracytoplasmic sperm injection trial. His sperm analysis showed severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia. After taking a traditional remedy he had a remarkable improvement in his sperm parameters, which led to the formation of 8 embryos in the following intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle. CONCLUSION: Traditional medicine presents various food and remedy options for treating male infertility. It seems that combination therapy can be beneficial in obtaining better results in treatment of male idiopathic infertility.

Dehydroepiandrosterone treatment in women with poor ovarian response undergoing IVF or ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: We reviewed the influence of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation in patients with poor ovarian response (POR) undergoing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). METHODS: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library (1980-2015) for relevant papers and used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale scoring system to evaluate study quality. Dichotomous data were expressed as pooled relative risk (RR) estimates with fixed or random effect models. Continuous variables were expressed as the weighted mean difference (WMD). All data were analyzed using Revman Software v. 5 and are shown with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. DHEA pretreatment increased the clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.53, 95 % CI 1.25-1.86), live birth rate (RR 1.87, 95 % CI 1.22-2.88), implantation rate (RR 1.56, 95 % CI 1.20-2.01), and antral follicle count (WMD 0.4, 95 % CI 0.14 to 0.66) while reducing miscarriages (RR 0.50, 95 % CI 0.27-0.90). After subgroup analysis, oocyte numbers and anti-Müllerian hormone levels were also enhanced after DHEA treatment. However, the endometrial thickness and estradiol levels on the day of injecting hCG to induce ovulation were similar between the DHEA supplementation groups and controls. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the limited available evidence, DHEA supplementation seems to improve ovarian reserves and IVF/ICSI outcome in patients with POR. Further research is required to clarify the effect of DHEA exposure in assisted reproduction technology.