Growth hormone supplementation during ovarian stimulation improves oocyte and embryo outcomes in IVF/PGT-A cycles of women who are not poor responders.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of human growth hormone (GH) supplementation during ovarian stimulation in women undergoing IVF/PGT-A cycles, who do not meet the Bologna criteria for poor ovarian response (POR). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 41 women with suboptimal outcomes in their first cycle of IVF/PGT-A including lower than expected number of MII oocytes, poor blastulation rate, and/or lower than expected number of euploid embryos for their age, who underwent a subsequent IVF/PGT-A cycle with the same fixed dose gonadotropin protocol and adjuvant GH treatment. Daily cotreatment with GH started with first gonadotrophin injection. The IVF cycle outcomes were compared between the control and GH cycle using the Wilcoxon-Signed Rank test. RESULTS: The total number of biopsied blastocysts (mean ± SD; 2.0 ± 1.6 vs 3.5 ± 3.2, p = 0.009) and euploid embryos (0.8 ± 1.0 vs 2.0 ± 2.8, p = 0.004) were significantly increased in the adjuvant GH cycle compared to the control cycle. The total number of MII oocytes also trended to be higher in the GH cycle (10.2 ± 6.3 vs 12.1 ± 8.3, p = 0.061). The overall blastulation and euploidy rate did not differ between the control and treatment cycle. CONCLUSION: Our study uniquely investigated the use of adjuvant GH in IVF/PGT-A cycles in women without POR and without a priori suspicion for poor outcome based on their clinical parameters. Our study presents preliminary evidence that GH supplementation in these women is beneficial and is associated with an increased number of blastocysts for biopsy and greater number of euploid embryos for transfer.

Three hour abstinence as a treatment for high sperm DNA fragmentation: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: This study sought to compare sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) in semen specimens after 3 days and then after 3 h of abstinence in men presenting for initial infertility evaluation. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of 112 men undergoing their first semen analysis as part of an infertility work-up was conducted. All participants presented with 3 days of abstinence for a semen analysis and DNA-fragmentation test. Both tests were repeated on a second sample collected 3 h after the first ejaculation. DNA-fragmentation was evaluated with the halo test by one of two technicians blinded to duration of abstinence. Variables analyzed include ejaculate volume, sperm concentration and motility, smoking status, cannabis use, initial specimen DNA fragmentation, and use of sperm-directed anti-oxidant formulations. RESULTS: Among all subjects, DNA fragmentation improved in the 3-h abstinence specimen (34.6 ± 19.4% vs. 23.7 ± 16.0%, p = 0.0001). Among subjects with high DNA fragmentation (> 35%) on the initial specimen, 55% improved into the normal range. Semen volume and sperm concentration decreased (3.1 ± 3.3 ml vs. 1.9 ± 0.8 ml, p < 0.01 and 41 ± 39 vs. 32 ± 31 (millions/ml), p = 0.01), while progressive motility tended to increase. Fifty-eight subjects demonstrated ≥ 30% improvement in SDF in the second specimen as compared to the first. Factors found to correlate with > 30% improvement in DNA fragmentation in the 3-h abstinence specimen compared to 3 days were younger age and use of anti-oxidants. CONCLUSION: High SDF can often be managed with a second ejaculation 3 h after the first in infertile couples, including in males with abnormal semen analyses per the 2010 WHO guide. Apart from SDF levels, changes in sperm quality were not clinically significant in the second specimen and did not increase rates of ICSI. However, a second ejaculation after 3 h probably may reduce the necessity of costly and/or invasive ART strategies.