RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate complications and urinary incontinence (UI) after endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) stratified by prostate volume (PV). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent EEP with different energy sources in 14 centers (January 2019-January 2023). INCLUSION CRITERIA: prostate volume ≥ 80 ml. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: prostate cancer, previous prostate/urethral surgery, pelvic radiotherapy. PRIMARY OUTCOME: complication rate. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: incidence of and factors affecting postoperative UI. Patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1: PV = 80-100 ml; Group 2 PV = 101-200 ml; Group 3 PV > 200 ml. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate independent predictors of overall incontinence. RESULTS: There were 486 patients in Group 1, 1830 in Group 2, and 196 in Group 3. The most commonly used energy was high-power Holmium laser followed by Thulium fiber laser in all groups. Enucleation, morcellation, and total surgical time were significantly longer in Group 2. There was no significant difference in overall 30-day complications and readmission rates. Incontinence incidence was similar (12.1% in Group 1 vs. 13.2% in Group 2 vs. 11.7% in Group 3, p = 0.72). The rate of stress and mixed incontinence was higher in Group 1. Multivariable regression analysis showed that age (OR 1.019 95% CI 1.003-1.035) was the only factor significantly associated with higher odds of incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: PV has no influence on complication and UI rates following EEP. Age is risk factor of postoperative UI.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Incontinencia Urinaria , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Incidencia , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Incontinencia Urinaria/epidemiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/efectos adversos , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/métodos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the clinical outcome and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TR biopsy) in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 556 patients who underwent HoLEP between 2014 and 2021. The patients were categorized into six groups: Group 1-A (n=45) underwent HoLEP within four months post TR biopsy. Group 1-B (n=94) underwent HoLEP more than four months post TR biopsy. Group 1-C (n=120) underwent HoLEP after a single TR biopsy. Group 1-D (n=19) underwent HoLEP after two or more TR biopsies. Group 1-total (n=139, group 1-A+group 1-B or group 1-C+group 1-D) underwent HoLEP post TR biopsy. Group 2 (control group, n=417) underwent HoLEP without prior TR biopsy. We examined perioperative parameters, safety, and functional outcomes. RESULTS: The age, body mass index, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), uroflowmetry, and comorbid diseases between group 1-total and group 2 were comparable. However, group 1-total exhibited significantly elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and larger prostate volumes (p<0.01). Perioperative factors like enucleation time, enucleation weight, and catheterization duration were notably higher in group 1-total (p<0.01). All groups showed significant improvements in IPSS, postvoid residual urine, and maximum flow rate during the 1-year postoperative period (p<0.05). The rates of postoperative complications were similar between group 1-total and group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Enucleation time and catheterization duration were significantly longer in the TR biopsy group. However, postoperative complications were not significantly different between TR biopsy and non-TR biopsy groups.
Asunto(s)
Láseres de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico por imagen , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Calidad de Vida , Biopsia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With nearly 50% of the population in the United States, Italy, and Sweden tattooed with at least one tattoo, the demand for its removal has risen by 32% since 2011. Traditional removal methods, such as Q-switched (QS) laser-based tattoo removal, can be lengthy, requiring up to 20 sessions. AIM: This study presents a retrospective clinical evaluation of seven short-pulsed QS, dual-wavelength Nd:YAG laser, as an efficient alternative, that can potentially reduce the number of sessions needed as calculated by a founded scale. METHODS: The QS modality delivers high-intensity pulses in four wavelengths, ideal for removing multicolored tattoos, of which two were used. We studied 11 patients who underwent 3-8 treatments (average 5.09) every 2-3 months. Each tattoo was assessed using the Kirby-Desai scale, considering the following factors: location, Fitzpatrick skin type, ink amount, layering, scarring, tissue changes, and tattoo color. Follow-ups were conducted after 6 months and at 4-5 years following last session. RESULTS: The long-term follow-up presented a significantly higher tattoo removal efficiency than the short-term follow-up (p < 0.001), indicating a sustained process of ink breakdown and elimination. Notably, the actual number of treatments were significantly lower than that predicted by the Kirby-Desai scale (average 5.09 vs. 9.9, p < 0.001). No severe adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the QS Nd:YAG laser offers a safe and effective alternative for tattoo removal, requiring fewer treatments than initially expected.
Asunto(s)
Láseres de Estado Sólido , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad , Tatuaje , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Eliminación de Tatuajes , Tatuaje/efectos adversosRESUMEN
To compare perioperative outcomes between Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and robotic-assisted simple pasta-ectomy (RASP)for large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia(> 80 ml). In August 2023, we undertook a comprehensive search of major global databases including PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar, focusing solely on articles written in English. Studies that were merely reviews or protocols without any specific published data were omitted. Furthermore, articles that comprised conference abstracts or content not pertinent to our subject of study were also disregarded. To calculate the inverse variances and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for categorical variables' mean differences, we employed the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel approach along with random-effects models. The findings were denoted in the form of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. A p-value less than 0.05 was deemed to indicate statistical significance. Our finalized meta-analysis incorporated six articles, including one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and five cohort studies. These studies accounted for a total of 1218 patients, 944 of whom underwent Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and 274 who underwent Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy (RASP). The pooled analysis from these six papers demonstrated that compared to RASP, HoLEP had a shorter hospital stay, shorter catheterization duration, and a lower blood transfusion rate. Moreover, HoLEP patients exhibited a smaller reduction in postoperative hemoglobin levels. Statistically, there were no significant differences between the two procedures regarding operative time, postoperative PSA, the weight of prostate specimens, IPSS, Qmax, PVR, QoL, and postoperative complications. (HoLEP) and (RASP) are both effective and safe procedures for treating large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia. HoLEP, with its benefits of shorter catheterization and hospitalization duration, lesser decline in postoperative hemoglobin, and reduced blood transfusion needs, stands as a preferred choice for treating extensive prostate enlargement. However, further validation through more high-quality clinical randomized trials is required.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Hemoglobinas , Terapia por Láser/efectos adversos , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Prostatectomía/métodos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Tulio/efectos adversos , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: Frailty is a recent multidimensional concept of a contemporary growing interest for understanding the complex health status of elderly population. We aimed to assess the impact of frailty scores on the outcome and complication rate of holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP). Methods: A 7-year data of HoLEP patients in a single tertiary referral center were reviewed. The preoperative, operative, early, and late postoperative outcome data were collected and compared according to the preoperative frailty scores. Frailty was assessed preoperatively using the Modified Hopkins frailty score. Results: The study included 837 patients categorized into two groups: group I included 533 nonfrail patients (frailty score = 0), whereas group II included 304 frail patients (frailty score ≥1). The median (interquartile range) age was 70 (11) and 75 (11) years for groups I and II, respectively (<0.001). The 30-day perioperative complication rate (p = 0.005), blood transfusion (p = 0.013), failed voiding trial (p = 0.0015), and 30-day postoperative readmission (p = 0.0363) rates were significantly higher in frail patients of group II. The two groups were statistically comparable regarding postoperative international prostate symptom score (p = 0.6886, 0.6308, 0.9781), incontinence rate (p = 0.475, 0.592, 0.1546), postvoid residual (p = 0.5801, 0.1819, 0.593) at 6 weeks and 3 months, and 1-year follow-up intervals, respectively. Conclusion: In elderly patients undergoing HoLEP, the preoperative frailty scores strongly correlate with the risk of perioperative complications. Frail patients should be counseled regarding their relative higher risk of early perioperative complications although they gain the same functional profit of HoLEP as nonfrail patients.
Asunto(s)
Fragilidad , Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Próstata/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Fragilidad/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Calidad de Vida , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/métodos , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , HolmioRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes in males given perioperative tranexamic acid (TXA) during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) to a historical cohort that did not receive TXA. METHODS: Our cohort included HoLEP patients (N = 1037) from August 2018 through November 2022. Exclusion criteria included history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or coronary stent placed within 18 months. The primary predictor was TXA during HoLEP. The primary outcome variable was a return to the operating room (RTOR) for bleeding. Secondary outcomes included catheter reinsertion, transfusion, and clotting complications. Multivariable models evaluating associations of TXA with outcomes were adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: In our cohort, 214/1035 had one or more complications with 81 having a Clavien-Dindo Grade of 3a or higher, 114/1037 with catheter reinsertion, 36/1037 RTOR for bleeding, and 15/1035 had a transfusion. TXA use was not associated with 30-day RTOR. 3.7% of those without TXA had a RTOR, and 3.1% of those with TXA had a RTOR (adjusted odds ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.28-1.38, P = .25). Transfusion rates were higher for those without TXA (2.0%) compared to with (0.5%). This was statistically significant after adjustment (adjusted odds ratio 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.69, P = .016) and after correction for multiple testing (corrected P = .048). TXA use was not associated with catheter reinsertion or clotting complications. CONCLUSION: Routine perioperative intravenous TXA in HoLEP patients was not associated with a reduction of RTOR for bleeding, catheter reinsertion, or clotting complications. TXA was associated with decreased transfusions with a low overall event rate of 1.4%.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Ácido Tranexámico , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/cirugía , Ácido Tranexámico/efectos adversos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Hemorragia/complicaciones , Holmio , Terapia por Láser/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: One of the main adverse outcomes following Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is the development of transient de novo urinary incontinence (UI). We aimed to evaluate the correlation of multiple risk factors to UI rates post-HoLEP. METHODS: A review of prospectively maintained 7 year database for HoLEP patients in a single center was performed. UI data at 6 week, 3 month, and 1 year follow-up intervals were assessed with bivariate and multivariate analysis of multiple potential risk factors. RESULTS: The study included 666 patients with median (IQR) age of 72 (66-78) years old and median (IQR) preoperative prostate volume of 89 (68-126) gm. UI was seen in 287 (43%), 100 (15%) and 26 (5.8%) at 6 week, 3 month, and 1 year follow up occasions respectively. At 6 weeks follow up, UI type was stress, urge and mixed in 121 (18.16%), 118 (17.72) and 48 (7.21%) patients respectively. Using a multivariate regression analysis, obesity and pre-operative UI were associated with postoperative UI rate at both 6 week (p = .0065, .031) and 3 month (p = .0261, .044) follow up encounters respectively. Also, larger specimen weight was another predictor for 6 week UI (p = .0399) while higher frailty score was a predictor for UI at 3 month occasion (p = .041). CONCLUSION: Patients with preoperative UI, obesity, frailty, and large prostate volume are at higher risk of short-term UI post-HoLEP up to 3 months. Patients with one or more of these risk factors should be counseled regarding the higher risk of UI.
Asunto(s)
Fragilidad , Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Incontinencia Urinaria , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Incidencia , Terapia por Láser/efectos adversos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Próstata/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/complicacionesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Vascular lesions of the lower extremities and face, such as varicose veins and telangiectasias, are a common dilemma for the dermatologist. In recent years, laser therapy has emerged as a viable treatment option for these vascular anomalies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Although there are several types of lasers, the 1064-nm Nd:YAG in particular is popularly selected for its safety profile and versatility. The longer 1064 nm wavelength penetrates deeper into the skin while also being less absorbed by hemoglobin and melanin, thus resulting in minimized damage to surrounding structures and less pigmentation changes. The new LP1064 applicator on the Harmony XL Pro Device is one such laser. RESULTS: Numerous publications have corroborated the efficacy of 1064 nm Nd:YAG lasers. These studies cite at least over 75% of patients experiencing significant improvement in common vascular lesions. Efficacy of this laser is also seen for other vascular lesions such as port wine stains, hemangiomas, venous lakes, poikiloderma of Civatte, and angiokeratomas. Overall, the reported studies also show a low incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSION: The 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser, such as the Harmony LP1064 applicator, is a safe and effective tool to treat vein anomalies of the face and leg. Although commonly used for vein ablation, it has demonstrated a robust response in other indications as well.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad , Mancha Vino de Oporto , Telangiectasia , Humanos , Telangiectasia/radioterapia , Telangiectasia/cirugía , Venas , Mancha Vino de Oporto/cirugía , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of Nd:YAG laser treatment for venous malformations. METHODS: Eighty patients with oral mucosal venous malformations underwent one or more Nd:YAG laser treatments, and photographs of the lesions before and after laser treatment were collected and compared, patients' satisfaction were assessed using visual analog scale (VAS). SPSS 22.0 software package was used for data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 58 cases were cured in 80 patients, 21 cases showed remarkable improvement. Nine patients(11.25%) experienced adverse effects after laser therapy, including atrophic scars in 2 patients, oral mucosal ulcers in 4 patients, transient hyperpigmentation in 2 patients, and transient hypopigmentation in 1 patient, which met the expected response to effective therapy, and the follow-up results showed that most patients achieved maximum satisfaction values. CONCLUSIONS: Nd:YAG laser is an effective and safe treatment for oral mucosal venous malformation with definite efficacy and few side effects, which is worthy of popularization and application.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad , Humanos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Satisfacción del Paciente , Terapia por Láser/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is considered a size-independent gold standard for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and there is no upper limit of prostate weight that can be treated. Tissue retrieval can be time-consuming in cases of significant prostatic enlargement, which may lead to intraoperative hypothermia. As there are few studies on perioperative hypothermia in HoLEP, we conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent HoLEP at our hospital. METHODS: The data of 147 patients who underwent HoLEP at our hospital were retrospectively collected and analyzed for the occurrence of intraoperative hypothermia (temperature <36°C); age, body mass index (BMI), anesthesia method, body temperature, total fluid infusion, operation time, and irrigation fluid were the explanatory variables. RESULTS: Intraoperative hypothermia was observed in 46 of 147 patients (31.3%). Simple logistic regression analysis showed that age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.13, p = 0.021), BMI (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.96, p = 0.017), spinal anesthesia (OR: 4.92, 95% CI: 1.86-14.99, p = 0.002), and surgical time (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06, p = 0.006) were predictors of hypothermia. The decrease in body temperature was more pronounced with longer-duration surgery and reached 0.58°C at 180 min. CONCLUSION: General anesthesia, instead of spinal anesthesia, is recommended in high-risk patients with advanced age or low BMI to avoid intraoperative hypothermia during HoLEP. Two-stage morcellation may be considered for large adenomas, when a prolonged operative time and hypothermia are anticipated.
Asunto(s)
Hipotermia , Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Hipotermia/etiología , Hipotermia/cirugía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/efectos adversos , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/métodos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Terapia por Láser/efectos adversos , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Holmio , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Melasma is an acquired pigmentary disorder which currently has no definitive treatment. Although topical drugs containing hydroquinone are the basis of treatments, they are usually associated with recurrence. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of monotherapy with topical methimazole 5% versus combination of Q-Switched Nd: YAG Laser and topical methimazole 5% in patients with refractory melasma. METHODS: A total of 27 women with refractory melasma were included. We applied topical methimazole 5% (once a day) with three passes of QSNd: YAG laser (Wavelength: 1064 nm, pulse energy: 750 mJ, fluence: 1.50 J/cm2 , spot size: 4 × 4 mm, hand piece: fractional, JEISYS company) for six sessions on the right half of the face, and topical methimazole 5% (once a day) on the left half of the face, for each patient. The treatment course was 12 weeks. Evaluation of effectiveness was done with the Physician Global Assessment (PGA), Patient Global Assessment (PtGA), Physician satisfaction (PS), Patients satisfaction (PtS), and mMASI score. RESULTS: PGA, PtGA, and PtS were not significantly different between the two groups at any time (p > 0.05). PS in the laser plus methimazole group was significantly better than methimazole group at 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks (p < 0.05). The rate of PGA improvement in the combination group was significantly better than the monotherapy over time (p < 0.001). The changes of mMASI score between the two groups did not significantly differ at any time (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with topical methimazole 5% and QSNY laser can be considered as an effective way to treat refractory melasma.
Asunto(s)
Láseres de Estado Sólido , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad , Melanosis , Humanos , Femenino , Metimazol/efectos adversos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Melanosis/diagnóstico , Melanosis/terapia , Melanosis/etiología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) was widely used in the assessment of surgical complications, but some inconsistencies always existed in urological literature. This study was aimed to report complications of the transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP), and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) by using a more detailed way under the framework of CDC. A total of 623 eligible cases underwent endoscopic procedures from January 2018 and December 2020 were divided into the TURP group (212 cases), the PKRP group (208 cases), and the HoLEP group (203 cases) according to the surgical type. Patients' surgical complications assessed by the CDC were compared among the 3 groups. The operation time, intraoperative irrigation volume, postoperative irrigation time and volume, decrease in hemoglobin and sodium, postoperative catheterization time, visual analogue scale, hospital stay of the PKEP group and the HoLEP group were significantly less than those of the TURP group, and the decrease in hemoglobin and visual analogue scale in the HoLEP group were significantly lower than those in the PKEP group (all P < .05). The electrolyte disturbance, urinary tract irritation, and patients with grade II of CDC in the PKRP group were significantly lower than those in the TURP group; The electrolyte disturbance, lower abdominal pain, urinary tract irritation, intraoperative hemorrhage, secondary hemorrhage, clot retention, patients with grade I, II, III of CDC in the HoLEP group were significantly lower than those in the TURP group, and the urinary tract irritation, grade I, II of CDC in the HoLEP group was significantly lower than that in the PKRP group (all P < .05). The CDC should be recommended because of the enhanced insight into surgical complications, and the HoLEP should be given a priority for Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgical treatment in terms of the merits in surgical characteristics and complications.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/efectos adversos , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/métodos , Próstata/cirugía , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Electrólitos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pigmented lesions from chronic UV photoaging are extremely common on the face and hands. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a 532-nm picosecond laser for these types of pigmented lesions. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, open-label clinical trial. Eligible subjects with pigmentation on the face and hands received 3 monthly treatments, with 1 month (1M) and 3 months (3M) follow-up. Change in investigator-graded overall facial and per lesion pigmentation and subject-graded satisfaction and pigmentation improvement was evaluated by a 5-point scale. Immediate skin response and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated post-treatment. The melanin index was measured using a mexameter. Randomized before and after photographs were graded by 3 blinded physicians for degree of pigmentation improvement. RESULTS: Twenty-five subjects (22F/3M) with Fitzpatrick skin types I-III were enrolled, with 23 subjects completing. Treatments used a 532 nm wavelength, 800 ps pulse duration, 4-6mm spot size, and 0.1 to 0.6J/cm2 fluence. Good-to-excellent clearance at 1M/3M was demonstrated in ≥95% of lesions (n = 116). Only mild treatment-related pain was reported, with transient post-treatment AEs (mean downtime of 2.1 ± 2.0 days) and no serious treatment-related AEs. Subject satisfaction (satisfied or very satisfied) was 95% at 1M and 91% at 3M. CONCLUSION: Treatment with a 532-nm picosecond laser is safe and highly effective for the treatment of the pigmented lesions of the face and dorsal hands.
Asunto(s)
Láseres de Estado Sólido , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad , Trastornos de la Pigmentación , Envejecimiento de la Piel , Humanos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/efectos adversos , Trastornos de la Pigmentación/radioterapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Masculino , FemeninoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This article attempted to describe the efficacy and safety of 1064QNYL in combination with other treatments for refractory melasma. METHODS: Two researchers independently retrieved randomized controlled trials (RCTs) according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary outcome was evaluated with MASI and mMASI scores in control group and experiment group. The secondary outcome was evaluated with MI scores. We calculated 95% CI of standardized mean difference (SMD) and heterogeneity of the included literature by Higgins I2 test, and assessed publication bias by Funnel plots, Egger's, and Begg's tests. RESULTS: A total of 12 articles including 322 subjects were analyzed. Experiment group was treated with 1064QNYL combined with single treatment (e.g., PDL, IPL, RF, and TA). Control group was treated with 1064QNYL alone. A greater reduction of Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI)/modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) scores were shown in experiment group than that in control group at the end of the treatment (SMD, -0.37; 95% CI -0.70 to -0.04, p = 0.03, I2 = 33%). The SMD of MI scores further supported this conclusion by -0.32 (95% CI -0.63 to -0.02, p = 0.04, I2 = 27%). As for adverse events (AEs), combined treatment gave rise to more mild burning, stinging, and erythema that resolved spontaneously. Several studies reported focal purpura, punctate leukoderma, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, and so on. CONCLUSION: Combined 1064QNYL treatment was better than single laser treatment, with the highest short-term benefit and long-term follow-up to maintain the effect in favor of combined treatment.
Asunto(s)
Hiperpigmentación , Hipopigmentación , Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad , Melanosis , Humanos , Hiperpigmentación/etiología , Hipopigmentación/etiología , Terapia por Láser/efectos adversos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/efectos adversos , Melanosis/etiología , Melanosis/radioterapia , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad , Humanos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Isotretinoína/efectos adversos , Acné Vulgar/complicaciones , Eritema/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Terapia por Láser/efectos adversos , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare the mid-term safety and efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate in the management of large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia. METHODS: From December 2016 to March 2018, patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (≥80 cc) were randomized (block randomization, computer-generated random list) to holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (57 patients) or bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (55 patients). Patients were excluded if they had an International Prostate Symptom Score <13, a maximum urinary flow rate >15 mL/s or presence of prostate cancer, bladder stone, urethral stricture, neurogenic bladder, or previous prostate surgery. The primary outcome was hemoglobin loss. The analysis was intention-to-treat. Postoperative findings (36 months) were compared to baseline characteristics. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed for risk factors predicting hemoglobin loss or operative time in all patients. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate was associated with significantly better operative time (P = 0.019), operative efficiency (P < 0.001), hemoglobin loss (P < 0.001), catheterization duration (P < 0.001) and hospital stay (P < 0.001) compared to bipolar transurethral resection of prostate. Both procedures were safe, with no significant difference in total complications (P = 0.128). Blood transfusion (P = 0.026) and capsular perforation (P = 0.239) were reported only in the bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate group. There was no significant difference in rates of urinary tract infections (P = 0.714), urethral strictures (P = 0.359), or transient stress incontinence (P = 0.717). At the last follow-up (3 years), holmium laser enucleation of the prostate was associated with significantly better International Prostate Symptom Scores, prostate-specific antigen levels and maximum urinary flow rates compared to bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (P < 0.05). In logistic regression analyses, prostate size and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate were associated with significantly greater hemoglobin loss, whereas prostate size, capsular perforation, and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate were associated with significantly longer operative time. CONCLUSION: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate are effective and safe for the management of moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms attributable to large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia (≥80 cc). However, if both techniques are available, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate is preferred due its better efficacy and safety profile.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Humanos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Masculino , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Treatment of melasma is challenging. Topical TA has shown promising results as an adjuvant, when combined with microneedling or QS Nd:YAG laser. The efficacy of both combinations has been demonstrated but the efficacy between these two combinations has never been compared. AIM AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and side effects of microneedling and QS Nd:YAG laser when combined with topical 3% TA gel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 60 patients were randomized into 2 groups. Group A received Nd:YAG laser sessions monthly with daily 3% TA gel while Group B underwent microneedling monthly with daily 3% TA gel. A total of 5 sessions were given with follow-up after 2 months. Evaluation using modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI), Patient satisfaction score, and photography was done at baseline, 3rd session, 5th session, and final follow-up. RESULTS: Mean fall in mMASI at follow-up in Group A was 5.12 ± 2.66 to 2.33 ± 1.33 and Group B was 4.60 ± 2.38 to 1.88 ± 1.08 (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction score was not significantly different. Side effects of both interventions included erythema, pain, and burning sensation. CONCLUSION: Our study shows equal efficacy of microneedling and QS Nd:YAG laser when combined with topical 3% TA gel in treating melasma without serious side effects. Microneedling has more downtime and maybe less preferable as a lunchtime procedure.
Asunto(s)
Láseres de Estado Sólido , Melanosis , Ácido Tranexámico , Eritema/etiología , Humanos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Melanosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanosis/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Ácido Tranexámico/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Up to 70% of the adult population worldwide is affected by androgenetic alopecia (AGA) hair loss. Laser therapy offers an addition or alternative to pharmaceutical and surgical treatment of hair regrowth, with non-ablative lasers being preferred over ablative lasers in terms of safety and downtime. Combining laser therapy with different topical agents may result in better hair regrowth. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of non-ablative Er:YAG laser used in clinical practice, alone or in combination with other treatment modalities, in patients with both early and advanced stages of AGA. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Sixteen patients (7 male and 9 female) with active AGA in different stages were treated with the non-ablative Er:YAG laser (SMOOTHTM mode, 7 mm spot size, 7.00 J/cm2 pulse fluence, 3.3 Hz frequency) as a monotherapy or in combination with injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to the scalp, topical minoxidil, and oral supplements for the promotion and support of hair growth. Efficacy was assessed with clinical assessment of AGA grade (Ludwig scale for female / Norwood-Hamilton scale for male) and with blind evaluation of hair quality in global photographs before and after treatment. Patients subjectively rated their satisfaction with the laser treatment on a scale from 0-3 and pain on a VAS scale from 0-10. RESULTS: AGA grade after treatment was lower compared to baseline (p = 0.015 and p = 0.125 in female and male patients, respectively). Blind evaluation indicated an improvement in hair quality in 93% of patients, either being described as much better (14%) or as better (79%), which was not correlated with age or AGA grade. The median satisfaction score was 3, and the median VAS score for pain was 2. The positive effect of the treatment on the hair quality is ongoing. No adverse reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment was effective in treating AGA, confirmed by a decrease in AGA grade and by blinded evaluation of global photographs. Although the possible additive or complementary effect of topical minoxidil or nutraceuticals cannot be excluded, our results suggest that the non-ablative Er:YAG laser SMOOTH™ mode as a monotherapy, or in combination with PRP, is an efficient and safe treatment for AGA-with a high satisfaction rate among patients regardless of patient age, AGA duration, or AGA stage.