RESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic has created unique challenges for the U.S. healthcare system due to the staggering mismatch between healthcare system capacity and patient demand. The healthcare industry has been a relatively slow adopter of digital innovation due to the conventional belief that humans need to be at the center of healthcare delivery tasks. However, in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, artificial intelligence (AI) may be used to carry out specific tasks such as pre-hospital triage and enable clinicians to deliver care at scale. Recognizing that the majority of COVID-19 cases are mild and do not require hospitalization, Partners HealthCare (now Mass General Brigham) implemented a digitally-automated pre-hospital triage solution to direct patients to the appropriate care setting before they showed up at the emergency department and clinics, which would otherwise consume resources, expose other patients and staff to potential viral transmission, and further exacerbate supply-and-demand mismatching. Although the use of AI has been well-established in other industries to optimize supply and demand matching, the introduction of AI to perform tasks remotely that were traditionally performed in-person by clinical staff represents a significant milestone in healthcare operations strategy.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , COVID-19 , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Triaje/métodos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Líneas Directas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Massachusetts , Pandemias , Gestión de la Salud PoblacionalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient medicines helplines provide a means of accessing medicines-related support following hospital discharge. However, it is unknown how many National Health Service (NHS) Trusts currently provide a helpline, nor how they are operated. Using the RE-AIM evaluation framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance), we sought to obtain key data concerning the provision and use of patient medicines helplines in NHS Trusts in England. This included the extent to which the delivery of helplines meet with national standards that are endorsed by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society (standards pertaining to helpline access, availability, and promotion). METHODS: An online survey was sent to Medicines Information Pharmacists and Chief Pharmacists at all 226 acute, mental health, specialist, and community NHS Trusts in England in 2017. RESULTS: Adoption: Fifty-two percent of Trusts reported providing a patient medicines helpline (acute: 67%; specialist: 41%; mental health: 29%; community: 18%). Reach: Helplines were predominantly available for discharged inpatients, outpatients, and carers (98%, 95% and 93% of Trusts, respectively), and to a lesser extent, the local public (22% of Trusts). The median number of enquiries received per week was five. IMPLEMENTATION: For helpline access, 54% of Trusts reported complying with all 'satisfactory' standards, and 26% reported complying with all 'commendable' standards. For helpline availability, the percentages were 86% and 5%, respectively. For helpline promotion, these percentages were 3% and 40%. One Trust reported complying with all standards. Maintenance: The median number of years that helplines had been operating was six. Effectiveness: main perceived benefits included patients avoiding harm, and improving patients' medication adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Patient medicines helplines are provided by just over half of NHS Trusts in England. However, the proportion of mental health and community Trusts that operate a helpline is less than half of that of the acute Trusts, and there are regional variations in helpline provision. Adherence to the national standards could generally be improved, although the lowest adherence was regarding helpline promotion. Recommendations to increase the use of helplines include increasing the number of promotional methods used, the number of ways to contact the service, and the number of hours that the service is available.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Información en Farmacia Clínica/provisión & distribución , Líneas Directas/provisión & distribución , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/provisión & distribución , Sistemas de Información en Farmacia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Inglaterra , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios , Líneas Directas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Pacientes , Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Illnesses caused by exposure to extracorporeal artificial substances play a major role in emergency medicine, family medicine, and environmental medicine. OBJECTIVE: The current situation of medical poisoning management and national reporting of poisonings in Germany are described. MATERIALS UND METHODS: The information and data presented here are derived from a literature review and from stakeholder interviews. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Eight poison centres (PCs) offer consultation supporting the diagnosis and treatment of poisoning cases in Germany today. Furthermore, those affected, their relatives and first aiders contact these German PCs, mainly because of a suspected poisoning. German PCs are also contacted by those affected and by institutions in other situations when expert toxicological judgement is needed, especially in cases with an environmental background. Often, interpretation of analytical laboratory results of body fluid samples or environmental samples are requested, or reference to environmental medicine treatment facilities is made. The PCs and the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) cooperate on the national reporting of the risks of poisoning for the population. In addition, the BfR collects and evaluates poisoning reports from German medical doctors that have been directly submitted. A pilot project on a national monitoring of poisonings should collate future case reports. An extensive and current overview of poisonings in Germany is a prerequisite for the identification of unsafe products and to fully comply with the international reporting needs of the German Federal Government in the case of chemical outbreaks and the resulting suspected cases.
Asunto(s)
Monitoreo del Ambiente/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Intoxicación/diagnóstico , Intoxicación/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Alemania , Sustancias Peligrosas , Líneas Directas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Notificación Obligatoria , Intoxicación/prevención & controlRESUMEN
CONTEXT: There is limited literature on characteristics of telephone triage programs and the nature of interventions in palliative care. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine frequency and type of care provided by a Supportive Care Center Telephone Triaging Program (SCCTP) in advanced cancer patients (ACPs). METHODS: Electronic medical records were reviewed of 400 consecutive ACPs referred to palliative care at a comprehensive cancer center and given access to the SCCTP: 200 from the outpatient (OP) supportive care center and 200 from inpatient (IP) palliative care given access after discharge. We reviewed call frequency, type, reason, and outcomes including pain and other symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale and Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale [MDAS]) associated with utilization of the SCCTP. RESULTS: A total of 375 patients were evaluable. One hundred fifteen of 400 patients (29%) used the SCCTP: 96 OPs (83%) used the SCCTP vs. only 19 IPs (17%) (P < 0.001). The most common reasons for calls were pain (24%), pain medication refills (24%), and counseling (12%). For 115 phone calls, 43% (145 of 340) of recommendations were regarding care at home and 56% were regarding opioids. Patients who used the SCCTP had worse pain (P = 0.006), fatigue (P = 0.045), depression (P = 0.041), and well-being (P = 0.015) and better MDAS scores (P = 0.014) compared with nonusers. OPs had a higher prevalence of symptom distress (P = 0.013), depression (P < 0.001), anxiety (P < 0.01), and insomnia scores (P = 0.001); MDAS scores were significantly higher in IPs (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that overall utilization of the SCCTP by ACPs referred to palliative care was relatively low at 28.7%. The use of the SCCTP was particularly poor among the IPs on discharge. Patients who used SCCTP had worse pain, fatigue, depression, and well-being scores and better delirium scores.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Líneas Directas/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Consulta Remota/estadística & datos numéricos , Triaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Participación del Paciente , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Texas/epidemiología , Revisión de Utilización de RecursosRESUMEN
QuitWorks is a Massachusetts referral program that links health care organizations, providers, and patients to the state's tobacco cessation quitline and provides feedback reporting. Designed collaboratively with all major Massachusetts health plans, QuitWorks was launched in April 2002. In 2010, approximately 340 institutions and practices used QuitWorks. Between April 2002 and March 2011, approximately 3,000 unique providers referred patients and 32,967 tobacco users received referrals. An analysis of QuitWorks data showed 3 phases in referrals between April 2002 and March 2011: referrals increased from April 2002 through November 2005, plateaued during December 2005 through January 2009, then substantially increased during February 2009 through March 2011. Factors responsible include partnerships with stakeholders, periodic program promotions, hospital activities in response to Joint Commission tobacco use measures, service evolutions, provision of nicotine replacement therapy for referred patients, and electronic referral options. QuitWorks' history demonstrates that tobacco cessation referral programs can be successfully sustained over time; reach substantial numbers of tobacco users, benefit providers and health care organizations; and contribute to sustainable systems-level changes in health care.
Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/métodos , Líneas Directas , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución/normas , Conducta Cooperativa , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act , Líneas Directas/instrumentación , Líneas Directas/estadística & datos numéricos , Líneas Directas/tendencias , Humanos , Massachusetts , Objetivos Organizacionales , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/tendencias , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Telefacsímil , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Tobacco use is the number one preventable cause of death and disability in the United States today. In 2003, the Interagency Committee on Smoking and Health recommended to establish a federally funded national tobacco quitline network by 2005. Quitlines are telephone-based programs that assist tobacco users to quit. The combination of health professionals referring patients to an accessible, evidence-based, cost-effective cessation resource can produce a substantial reduction in the number of tobacco users in the United States. Initiatives to increase knowledge and working relationships between nurses and quitlines need to be created, implemented, and evaluated.
Asunto(s)
Líneas Directas , Consulta Remota , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Tabaquismo/rehabilitación , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Salud Holística , Líneas Directas/economía , Líneas Directas/organización & administración , Líneas Directas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Psicoterapia/métodos , Consulta Remota/economía , Consulta Remota/organización & administración , Consulta Remota/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine the infrastructure, successes, and challenges of a teleconsultation service for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The HIV Warmline is a telephone consultation service providing free, live HIV/AIDS management advice to U.S. clinicians. We present descriptive data about callers, patients, and consultation topics gathered by electronic query of the HIV Warmline database for 2009. Caller satisfaction survey results for 2009 are also presented. RESULTS: The HIV Warmline has provided more than 37,000 consultations since its inception in 1992. The service provides consultations to clinicians from all 50 states, from a variety of professional backgrounds, and with a wide range of HIV experience levels. The majority of call topics concern antiretroviral therapy. Callers are generally pleased with the service, giving a mean Likert scale rating of 4.7 on satisfaction survey questions. CONCLUSION: The experience of the HIV Warmline can serve as a model for other programs planning to develop remote consultation systems. HIV teleconsultation has been relatively simple to implement and can be useful for many types of clinicians. HIV teleconsultation should continue to be evaluated as a way to improve HIV care, especially in areas without easy access to HIV expertise.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Líneas Directas/normas , Satisfacción del Paciente , Consulta Remota/métodos , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Femenino , Financiación Gubernamental , Líneas Directas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Consulta Remota/normas , Consulta Remota/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Poison Control Centers (PCCs) provide telephone consultations to manage poisonings. They are threatened with funding loss. Policy decision-makers have requested an evaluation of alternate models for telephone management of poisonings. OBJECTIVE: We examined the feasibility of alternative models for the telephone management of poisonings from the public. METHODS: Alternative models evaluated included emergency medical dispatchers (EMDs), advice nurses (RNs), and poison information providers (PIPs) to manage real and hypothetical poisonings with protocols or computerized references (Poisindex) with and without PCC backup. RESULTS: EMDs and RNs with a structured protocol and access to a PCC specialist were able to manage a small subset of poisoning calls. EMDs and RNs managed 6% and 12% of poisoning calls respectively. Non-protocol management of hypothetical cases using Poisindex resulted in mismanagement of cases and longer periods of time to manage cases. PIPs within a PCC were able to manage a substantially greater proportion of calls, but had a significant portion of non-productive time waiting for a PCC call. CONCLUSION: EMDs, RNs, and technician-level PIPs can manage a subset of poisoning cases using structured protocols. Alternative providers were dependent on PCC staff for consultation of the majority of poisoning calls. There are several obstacles to these models and their cost-effectiveness needs to be determined. These studies were the basis of a new staffing model with the integration of PIPs into the call response system in California.
Asunto(s)
Líneas Directas/organización & administración , Modelos Organizacionales , Pediatría , Intoxicación , Eficiencia Organizacional , Líneas Directas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , San FranciscoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Recent data demonstrate that the mortality rate from carbon monoxide poisoning has declined over the past 2 decades. It is not known whether this decrease in mortality is reflective of the total burden of carbon monoxide poisoning. This study sought to examine trends in other potential indicators of the incidence of carbon monoxide poisoning in the United States. BASIC PROCEDURES: Published data from US poison control centers (PCCs) were used to calculate annual rates of calls regarding carbon monoxide exposures. Data on numbers of carbon monoxide-poisoned patients treated with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) were used to calculate annual treatment rates. Trends in rates of carbon monoxide-related mortality, calls to PCCs, and HBO treatment were then compared. MAIN FINDINGS: Contrary to the decline in carbon monoxide-related mortality from 1968 to 1998, rates of calls to PCCs significantly increased over the same period. Neither rates of PCC calls nor HBO treatment changed significantly from 1992 to 2002. The latter 2 measures were strongly correlated. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS: Although deaths from carbon monoxide poisoning have clearly decreased in the United States, other indicators of the incidence of the condition suggest that the total burden (fatal and nonfatal) may not have significantly changed. Efforts to prevent carbon monoxide poisoning should not be relaxed.
Asunto(s)
Intoxicación por Monóxido de Carbono/epidemiología , Intoxicación por Monóxido de Carbono/diagnóstico , Intoxicación por Monóxido de Carbono/terapia , Líneas Directas/estadística & datos numéricos , Líneas Directas/tendencias , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/estadística & datos numéricos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/tendencias , Incidencia , Modelos Lineales , Mortalidad/tendencias , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones/tendencias , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Carbón Orgánico/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Ipeca/uso terapéutico , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Intoxicación/terapia , Consulta Remota , Adulto , Carbón Orgánico/economía , Niño , Costos de los Medicamentos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Líneas Directas/economía , Líneas Directas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Consulta Remota/economíaAsunto(s)
Fraude/prevención & control , Adhesión a Directriz , Líneas Directas/estadística & datos numéricos , Benchmarking , Toma de Decisiones en la Organización , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Deber de Advertencia , Innovación Organizacional , Objetivos Organizacionales , Revelación de la Verdad , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
This study reports factors associated with participation in a colorectal cancer screening program for a cohort of workers on a polypropylene manufacturing unit. The impetus for the screening program was the discovery of a colorectal cancer cluster among workers on this unit. The program included a life-style/risk factor questionnaire, fecal occult blood test, a 60-cm colonoscopy, and an air-contrast barium enema. Overall, 52.5% of the 406 men who were offered screening participated in the program. Of those screened, only 40% attended a briefing, but over 80% of those who attended a briefing came for screening. Factors associated with completion of screening are analyzed and discussed in the context of the literature on participation in colorectal screening programs. The implications for colorectal cancer screening of occupational groups believed to be at high risk are considered.