Development of a biomarker to monitor target engagement after treatment with dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitors.

Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) catalyzes a key step in pyrimidine biosynthesis and has recently been validated as a therapeutic target for malaria through clinical studies on the triazolopyrimidine-based Plasmodium DHODH inhibitor DSM265. Selective toxicity towards Plasmodium species could be achieved because malaria parasites lack pyrimidine salvage pathways, and DSM265 selectively inhibits Plasmodium DHODH over the human enzyme. However, while DSM265 does not inhibit human DHODH, it inhibits DHODH from several preclinical species, including mice, suggesting that toxicity could result from on-target DHODH inhibition in those species. We describe here the use of dihydroorotate (DHO) as a biomarker of DHODH inhibition. Treatment of mammalian cells with DSM265 or the mammalian DHODH inhibitor teriflunomide led to increases in DHO where the extent of biomarker buildup correlated with both dose and inhibitor potency on DHODH. Treatment of mice with leflunomide (teriflunomide prodrug) caused a large dose-dependent buildup of DHO in blood (up to 16-fold) and urine (up to 5,400-fold) that was not observed for mice treated with DSM265. Unbound plasma teriflunomide levels reached 20-85-fold above the mouse DHODH IC50, while free DSM265 levels were only 1.6-4.2-fold above, barely achieving âˆ¼ IC90 concentrations, suggesting that unbound DSM265 plasma levels are not sufficient to block the pathway in vivo. Thus, any toxicity associated with DSM265 treatment in mice is likely caused by off-target mechanisms. The identification of a robust biomarker for mammalian DHODH inhibition represents an important advance to generally monitor for on-target effects in preclinical and clinical applications of DHODH inhibitors used to treat human disease.

Effectiveness of Bailing capsules in the treatment of lupus nephritis: A meta­analysis.

Previous studies have explored the treatment of lupus nephritis with Bailing capsules; however, due to limited sample sizes and inconsistent results across these studies, no definitive conclusions have been drawn. Thus, the present study aimed to provide evidence for the effectiveness of Bailing capsules in the treatment of lupus nephritis. To obtain relevant clinical studies (published before 20 July 2019), PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched, and relevant studies concerning the use of Bailing capsules for treating lupus nephritis were selected. The extracted data were general characteristics such as the first author, publication year, study year, follow­up time, age, sex, course of the disease and a number of outcome indicators. These included systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) score, serum albumin (Alb), 24­h urinary protein, serum creatinine, anti­ds­DNAIgM, complement component 3 (C3), and the number of effective treatments and complications. Meta­analysis was performed using R­3.12 software. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test. A total of 14 studies comprising 1,301 participants were combined for analysis in the present study. The results demonstrated that with the exception of anti­ds­DNAIgM and complement C3, other indicators, such as SLEDAI score, Alb, 24­h urinary protein, serum creatinine, and the number of effective treatments and complications) in the Bailing capsule treatment group were improved compared with those in the control group. The results of the present meta­analysis suggested that Bailing capsules may be effective in the treatment of lupus nephritis.

[Biological therapy after COVID-19 infection : No reactivation of a COVID-19 infection with positive SARS-CoV-2 antibody status under biological therapy]. / Biologikatherapie nach COVID-19-Infektion : Keine Reaktivierung einer COVID-19-Infektion bei positivem Antikörperstatus SARS-CoV-2 unter Biologikatherapie.

A case with rheumatoid arthritis and insufficient compensation under disease-modifying combined long-term therapy with methotrexate and leflunomide is reported. After recovery from a COVID-19 infection, a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor therapy was initiated. Until now no reactivation of the COVID-19 infection with positive SARS-CoV­2 antibody status has occurred.

[Systematic reviews of effects of Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets on pro-inflammatory factors in rheumatoid arthritis].

To systematically evaluate the effects of Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets alone or in combination with methotrexate(MTX) and leflunomide(LEF) on the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in patients or animal models with rheumatoid arthritis(RA), and to provide reference for clinical application and related basic research, this study systematically searched databases of CNKI, VIP, WanFang, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, collected relevant clinical or animal experimental studies, used risk assessment tools to evaluate the quality of research, and used Revman 5.3 software to conduct Meta-analysis or descriptive analysis of the outcome indicators included in the literatures. Of the 1 709 papers retrieved, 3 clinical studies and 12 animal experiments were included. The results showed that compared with MTX alone, Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets combined with MTX could further reduce the expression levels of peripheral blood TNF-α(SMD=-8.88,95%CI[-10.77,-6.99],P<0.000 01),IL-1ß(P<0.000 01) and IL-6(SMD=-8.63, 95%CI[-10.57,-6.69], P<0.000 01) in RA patients. Compared with LEF alone, the combination of Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets and LEF could not further reduce the expression levels of TNF-α(P=0.20), IL-1ß(P=0.17), IL-6(P=0.31). In RA animal model, compared with model group, Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets could reduce the expression levels of peripheral blood IL-1ß(SMD=-6.29,95%CI[-9.64,-2.93],P<0.000 2)in peripheral blood(SMD=-1.39,95%CI[-1.77,-1.02],P<0.000 01), joint fluid(P<0.000 01) and paw plasma(P=0.02), and also reduce the expression levels of TNF-α in RA animal model group. Compared with MTX alone, Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets alone reduced the same levels of TNF-α(P=0.42) and IL-6(P=0.08) in joint fluid, while Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets combined with MTX could further reduce the levels of IL-6(P=0.000 1) in joint fluid; compared with LEF alone, Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets have the similar effects on reducing the expression levels of peripheral blood TNF-α(P=0.16), IL-1ß(P=0.32), IL-6(P=0.12), while Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets combined with LEF could further reduce the expression levels of TNF-α(P=0.008), IL-1ß(P=0.02), IL-6(P<0.000 1) in peripheral blood. Therefore, Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets combined with MTX could further reduce the expression levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood of RA patients. Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets alone could reduce the expression levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood and local joint of RA animal models. Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets combined with MTX or LEF could further reduce the express levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood of RA animal models. Due to the limitation of literature, this conclusion needs to be further validated.

The role of Chinese herbal medicine in the management of adverse drug reactions of leflunomide in treating rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The high discontinuation rate in RA patients who use LEF might be attributed to their intolerance rather than irresponsibility. The concomitant administration of Leflunomide (LEF) with Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) provides a potential solution to preventing the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) induced by LEF during the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). PURPOSE: To investigate whether co-administration of LEF with CHM could bring in both increased therapeutic outcomes and reduced ADRs due to the framework of treatment at the level of entire body. STUDY DESIGN: The mechanism of LEF in RA treatment and the ADRs it induced was introduced based on recent papers. Reported clinical examples of CHM concurrent use with LEF was revealed to provide more evidence. The management of the ADRs caused by LEF was suggested by current researches on the concomitant therapy of CHM with LEF. RESULTS: The active ingredients, compounds and medicinal herbs all demonstrated properties in relieving toxicities and reducing ADRs when used with LEF and reported in several clinical cases. The wide application of concurrent use of CHM with LEF is however hindered by the complex pathogenesis of RA which requires further scientific grounds for diagnosis and treatment. CONCLUSION: This review introduced that the adoption of CHM is emerging as a novel strategy for the management of ADRs caused by LEF.

Management of Ganciclovir Resistant Cytomegalovirus Retinitis in a Solid Organ Transplant Recipient: A Review of Current Evidence and Treatment Approaches.

Purpose: Cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR) is a serious and potentially sight-threatening infection in immunocompromised individuals. Strategies for the management of drug-resistant CMVR are described. Methods: A case of severe bilateral CMVR in a single lung transplant patient, with UL97 mutation conferring ganciclovir-resistance, is presented. Treatment with standard antiviral agent and adjuvant leflunomide, immunosuppression modifications (calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroid), intravitreal antiviral therapy and novel use of CMV-immunoglobulin is described. A literature review to support drug-resistant CMVR management is presented. Results: Severe and progressive CMV retinitis was refractory to intravitreal foscarnet and systemic leflunomide. Drug-toxicity restricted systemic antiviral therapy options. The use of combined leflunomide and CMV-immunoglobulins, in the absence of viremia, has not been previously reported. Loss of ganciclovir-resistance was eventually observed permitting successful treatment with systemic and intravitreal ganciclovir. Conclusions: Drug-resistant CMVR is a complex clinical challenge. Multiple systemic and local treatment strategies may be necessary but toxicity, resistance, and co-morbidities may severely restrict available options.

Quality of life and clinical outcomes in Polish patients with high activity rheumatoid arthritis treated with leflunomide (Arava®) in Therapeutic Program: A retrospective analysis of data from the PLUS study.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease. Therapy is based on disease-modifying agents. Methotrexate (MTX) is used in first-line therapy and, in the case of failure, its alternatives include leflunomide, which was recommended in Poland within the National Health Fund Therapeutic Program. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the parameters of quality of life of Polish patients with high RA activity during treatment with leflunomide. Additional aims were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the data from the PLUS study. The PLUS study comprised 887 adult patients from 30 centers. During the study patients received leflunomide in a maintenance dose of 20 mg or 10 mg once daily. Before the study, 100 mg of leflunomide had been administered daily for 3 days, followed by a maintenance dose of 20 mg/day or 10 mg/day for at least a month before enrollment. The PLUS study observation time was up to 12 months with 1 control visit every 3 months. The patients' quality of life was assessed with Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and CRP (C-reactive protein) concentration were used to assess the disease activity. RESULTS: Six hundred seventy-nine patients completed the study. The HAQ-DI decreased after 3 months of observation (mean value 1.46 vs baseline 1.63; p = 0.001) and remained stable. The percentage of patients with HAQ-DI less than 1 and greater than 2 increased from 12.2% to 17.8% and decreased from 33.2% to 20.3%, respectively (p < 0.0001); DAS28 progressively decreased on subsequent visits. C-reactive protein and ESR decreased after 3 months and remained stable. Adverse events were observed in 4.4% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with standard leflunomide doses is safe and allows for significant clinical improvement.

Efficacy and safety of total glucosides of paeony combined with methotrexate and leflunomide for active rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis.

Purpose: Total glucosides of paeony (TGP) have been confirmed to reduce hepatotoxicity caused by methotrexate (MTX) and leflunomide (LEF) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Nevertheless, high-quality evidence-based meta-analysis data on the issue are unavailable. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination treatment for RA. Materials and methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials, Chinese Biomedical Literature database, China National Knowledge Internet, Wan Fang, and VIP were searched up to February 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of TGP combined MTX and LEF for RA were included. Results: Eight RCTs were included in the final meta-analysis. Pooled results showed better therapeutic effects against RA in the TGP-treated group (RR =1.10, 95% CI: 1.04 -1.16). The TGP+MTX+LEF group showed a reduced erythrocyte sedimentation rate (MD = -2.80 mm/h, 95% CI: -5.08 - -0.52), C-reactive protein level (MD = -4.17 mg/L, 95% CI: -7.84 - -0.51), and rheumatoid factor (MD = -12.09 IU/mL, 95% CI: -14.05 - -10.14). Besides, the combination treatment tended to benefit lipid profiles (total cholesterol: 95% CI: -1.27-0.06; triglycerides: 95% CI: -0.49 - -0.08; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: 95% CI: 0.15-0.83; and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: 95% CI: -0.54 - -0.02). Adverse events, hepatotoxicity in particular, significantly decreased (RR =0.55, 95% CI: 0.38-0.80) in the TGP group. Conclusion: Compared to MTX and LEF therapy, TGP combination treatment may be a more effective and safer strategy. It is advisable to apply TGP as an adjuvant given its hepatoprotective and possible lipid-regulating effect. However, further large-scale and high-quality clinical trials are warranted, and the efficacy of TGP in terms of its effect on lipid profiles should be further confirmed.

Comparison of combination therapy with methotrexate and sinomenine or leflunomide for active rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: A combination of conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs improves the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis but with high side-effects. Methotrexate (MTX) combination therapy that with high therapeutic efficacy and low toxicity is in demand in many countries to replace the use of expensive biological agents. STUDY DESIGN: This study was an open-label, 24-week, parallel randomized controlled trial conducted between November 2015 and December 2017. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned at a 3:2 ratio to receive MTX combined with sinomenine (SIN) at a dose of 120 mg twice daily, or leflunomide (LEF) at a dose of 20 mg once daily. Efficacy and safety were assessed at weeks 4, 12 and 24. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR)50 response and a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) good response at week 24. RESULTS: A total of 101/120 (84.2%) patients completed 24 weeks of observation. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, 65.3% of patients treated with MTX + SIN showed improved disease activity as determined by the ACR50 response at week 24 compared to 69.6% of patients treated with MTX + LEF. A similar insignificant pattern was found for the ACR20 and ACR70 responses, as well as the clinical disease activity index, EULAR response, and remission and low disease activity rates between these two treatment groups. The per-protocol analysis showed results consistent with those of the ITT analysis. Notably, significant reductions in gastrointestinal adverse reactions and liver toxicity were found in patients treated with MTX + SIN compared to patients treated with MTX + LEF (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Considering the balance of efficacy and toxicity, the current study provides evidence that MTX + SIN combination therapy is probably one of the choices for treating patients with active rheumatoid arthritis in addition to MTX + LEF combination therapy.