Constrictive pericarditis in the setting of repeated chest trauma in a mixed martial arts fighter.

BACKGROUND: Constrictive pericarditis (CP) is characterized by scarring and loss of elasticity of the pericardium. This case demonstrates that mixed martial arts (MMA) is a previously unrecognized risk factor for CP, diagnosis of which is supported by cardiac imaging, right and left heart catheterization, and histological findings of dense fibrous tissue without chronic inflammation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 47-year-old Caucasian male former mixed martial arts (MMA) fighter from the Western United States presented to liver clinic for elevated liver injury tests (LIT) and a 35-pound weight loss with associated diarrhea, lower extremity edema, dyspnea on exertion, and worsening fatigue over a period of 6 months. Past medical history includes concussion, right bundle branch block, migraine headache, hypertension, chronic pain related to musculoskeletal injuries and fractures secondary to MMA competition. Involvement in MMA was extensive with an 8-year history of professional MMA competition and 13-year history of MMA fighting with recurrent trauma to the chest wall. The patient also reported a 20-year history of performance enhancing drugs including testosterone. Physical exam was notable for elevated jugular venous pressure, hepatomegaly, and trace peripheral edema. An extensive workup was performed including laboratory studies, abdominal computerized tomography, liver biopsy, echocardiogram, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Finally, right and left heart catheterization-the gold standard-confirmed discordance of the right ventricle-left ventricle, consistent with constrictive physiology. Pericardiectomy was performed with histologic evidence of chronic pericarditis. The patient's hospital course was uncomplicated and he returned to NYHA functional class I. CONCLUSIONS: CP can be a sequela of recurrent pericarditis or hemorrhagic effusions and may have a delayed presentation. In cases of recurrent trauma, CP may be managed with pericardiectomy with apparent good outcome. Further studies are warranted to analyze the occurrence of CP in MMA so as to better define the risk in such adults.

Cardiac perforation complicating cardiac electrophysiology procedures: value of angiography and use of a closure device to avoid cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) is used for the diagnosis of cardiac perforation (CP) although it has significant limitations. We report our experience with angiography to assist in the diagnosis and management of cardiac perforation during electrophysiology procedures. METHODS: Patients with suspected CP after pacemaker lead insertion (temporary = 2, permanent = 2) or during epicardial mapping/ablation (n = 2) were included. All patients underwent initial angiography with repeat study performed post-lead repositioning/withdrawal for the pacemaker cases. Patients with CP due to permanent pacing leads underwent CT comparison. RESULTS: In 4 pacemaker patients, temporary leads caused two acute perforations, permanent active fixation leads caused one subacute right ventricular perforation and one delayed right atrial perforation. CT overdiagnosed CP in one temporary pacemaker patient, and was non-diagnostic in an atrial lead perforation, whereas angiography was accurate in both. Angiography identified an active leak in atrial lead CP, guided percutaneous closure in one case and demonstrated sealing of perforation in all cases. In the 2 epicardial ablation cases, 1 patient underwent surgical repair after a persistent right ventricular perforation, but the other avoided surgery with novel use of an Amplazter® patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure device (Abbott, St Paul, MN, USA). CONCLUSIONS: Angiography may be more accurate than CT in the diagnosis of CP. Angiography is easy to perform, can be done acutely, reveals active leaks and can demonstrate sealing of perforations after percutaneous lead repositioning. Utilisation of a PDA closure device may avoid the need for surgery for RV perforation.