Leucemias agudas pediátricas de inmunofenotipo inusual / Childhood acute leukemias of unusual phenotype

La mayoría de las Leucemias Agudas (LA) pediátricas pueden clasificarse como Linfoblásticas (principalmente de fenotipo B o T) o Mieloblásticas dependiendo del linaje celular de los blastos, recibiendo tratamiento específico de acuerdo a esta caracterización. La inmunotipificación de las LA se basa en la evaluación de la expresión de antígenos de superficie y/o intracitoplasmáticos de diferenciación linfoide (B o T) o mieloide (My) en los blastos, lo cual permite definir la estirpe celular y clasificar la LA de acuerdo al grado de maduración. Sin embargo, existen grupos particulares poco frecuentes de LA cuya clasificación resulta dificultosa y por eso se las denomina LA de linaje ambiguo (fenotipo mixto/indiferenciadas) y LA de linaje dendrítico. Las de fenotipo mixto son aquellas en las que los blastos expresan marcadores de más de un linaje, y las indiferenciadas aquellas que no expresan antígenos específicos para ningún linaje. Diferentes convenciones se han ido desarrollando para definir y clasificar estos fenotipos inusuales, siendo la más actualizada la propuesta por la Organización Mundial de la Salud (2008). De acuerdo a estas pautas, de 1301 casos de LA diagnosticados entre abril de 1994 y abril de 2009, 28 fueron re-clasificados como LA de linaje Ambiguo, 3 como leucemia mieloide aguda minimamente diferenciadas y 3 como LA de células dendríticas. Debido a lo infrecuente de estos casos, su caracterización resulta relevante, ya que la bibliografía presenta, en general, sólo comunicaciones esporádicas de estos fenotipos particulares. Dada la importante casuística del Hospital Garrahan y el amplio seguimiento de los pacientes, el relevamiento de estos casos inusuales permite caracterizarlos desde el inmunofenotipo, la morfología/citoquímica, la citogenética/biología molecular y evaluar su presentación clínica, evolución, respuesta al tratamiento y sobrevida libre de eventos con la finalidad de colaborar con la definición de su pronóstico y eventualmente con la elaboración de protocolos de tratamiento diferenciados para estos subgrupos de LA (AU)

The majority of childhood acute leukemias (AL) can be classified as lymphoblastic (mainly phenotype B or T) or myeloblastic, depending on the cell lineage of the blasts, requiring specific treatment according to this characterization. Immunotypification of AL is based on surface and/or intracytoplasmic antigen expression with lymhoid (B or T) or myeloide (My) blast differentiation, allowing definition of cell lineage and classification of the AL according to the grade of maturation. Nevertheless, there are rare cases of AL that are difficult to classify, denominated AL of ambiguous lineage (mixed/undifferentiated lineage) and acute dendritic cell leukemia. In AL of the mixed phenotype, the blasts express markers of more than one lineage and in undifferentiated AL, the blasts lack antigen expression of any specific lineage. Different conventions have tried to define and classify these unusual phenotypes, among which the most recent proposal of the World Health Organization (2008). According to the criteria of the latter, of 1301 cases of AL diagnosed between April 1994 and April 2009, 28 were re-classified as AL of ambiguous lineage, 3 as minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukemia, and 3 as acute dendritic cell leukemia. Characterization of these cases is important, as in the literature only sporadic reports of these rare phenotypes are found. Given the large number of patients with a long follow-up of the Garrahan Hospital, a review of these unusual cases allowed characterization from the point of view of the immunophenotype, morphology/cytochemistry, cytogenetics/molecular biology and to evaluate clinical presentation, evolution, response to treatment, and event-free survival to help define the prognosis and develop protocols for the treatment of these subgroups of AL (AU)

Fulminant septicemia of Bacillus cereus resistant to carbapenem in a patient with biphenotypic acute leukemia.

We report a case of fulminant septicemia with Bacillus cereus resistant to carbapenem. A 33-year-old man was suffering from febrile neutropenia (FN) on day 15 after the start of remission-induction therapy for biphenotypic acute leukemia under gut decontamination with polymyxin B and nystatin. Meropenem, a carbapenem, was administered according to the guideline for FN. Two days later (on day 17), he complained of severe abdominal pain, lost consciousness, went into sudden cardiopulmonary arrest, and died. Autopsy showed multiple spots of hemorrhage and necrosis caused by bacterial plaque in the brain, lungs, and liver. B. cereus was isolated from a blood sample obtained in the morning on day 17 and it was after his death that the isolated B. cereus was revealed to be resistant to carbapenem. B. cereus obtained from blood samples has been reported to be usually sensitive to carbapenem and also to vancomycin, new quinolones, and clindamycin. If B. cereus resistant to carbapem increases, our method of gut decontamination with polymyxin B and nystatin may have to be changed to one containing a new quinolone for the prevention of septicemia. Careful watching to determine whether B. cereus resistant to carbapem increases may be also important for empiric therapy, because carbapenem is often selected as the initial therapy for FN in patients with severe neutropenia.

Relationship between in vitro chemosensitivity assessed with MTT assay and clinical outcomes in 103 patients with acute leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Cellular drug resistance is supposed to play a major role in chemotherapy failure or relapse. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between in vitro chemosensitivity test results using a 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and clinical response on chemotherapy, and to find the possibility of optimizing the treatment protocol for individual patients according to their actual drug resistance. METHODS: For MTT assay, we obtained bone marrow aspirates from 103 patients with acute leukemia at the time of initial diagnosis or relapse. The following drugs were tested: cytarabine, vincristine, methotrexate, daunorubicin, dexamethasone, L-asparaginase, and mitoxantrone. To evaluate clinical responses after induction chemotherapy, we followed up on their bone marrow study. RESULTS: In our study, in vitro chemosensitivity test with the MTT assay significantly predicted whether patients with AML remained continuous complete remission or went into relapse. It also predicted whether or not child patients with ALL would acquire complete remission after induction chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although it does not provide the insight into the mechanisms that cause drug resistance, the MTT assay may be a useful tool in individually optimizing the chemotherapy of patients with acute leukemia.

Relationship between In Vitro Chemosensitivity assessed with MTT Assay and Clinical Outcomes in 103 Patients with Acute Leukemia / 대한진단검사의학회지

BACKGROUND: Cellular drug resistance is supposed to play a major role in chemotherapy failure or relapse. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between in vitro chemosensitivity test results using a 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and clinical response on chemotherapy, and to find the possibility of optimizing the treatment protocol for individual patients according to their actual drug resistance. METHODS: For MTT assay, we obtained bone marrow aspirates from 103 patients with acute leukemia at the time of initial diagnosis or relapse. The following drugs were tested: cytarabine, vincristine, methotrexate, daunorubicin, dexamethasone, L-asparaginase, and mitoxantrone. To evaluate clinical responses after induction chemotherapy, we followed up on their bone marrow study. RESULTS: In our study, in vitro chemosensitivity test with the MTT assay significantly predicted whether patients with AML remained continuous complete remission or went into relapse. It also predicted whether or not child patients with ALL would acquire complete remission after induction chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although it does not provide the insight into the mechanisms that cause drug resistance, the MTT assay may be a useful tool in individually optimizing the chemotherapy of patients with acute leukemia.