RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infants who are born from mothers with substance use disorder might suffer from neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and need treatment with medicines. One of these medicines is phenobarbital, which may cause side effects in long-term consumption. Alternative drugs can be used to reduce these side effects. This study seeks the comparison of the effects of phenobarbital & levetiracetam as adjuvant therapy in neonatal abstinence syndrome. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was performed in one year from May 2021 until May 2022. The neonates who were born from mothers with substance use disorder and had neonatal abstinence syndrome in Afzalipoor Hospital of Kerman were studied. The treatment started with morphine initially and every four hours the infants were checked. The infants who were diagnosed with uncontrolled symptoms After obtaining informed consent from the parents were randomly divided into two groups and treated with secondary drugs, either phenobarbital or levetiracetam. RESULTS: Based on the obtained results, it was clear that there was no significant difference between the hospitalization time of the two infant groups under therapy (phenobarbital: 18.59 days versus Levetiracetam 18.24 days) (P-value = 0.512). Also, there was no significant difference between both groups in terms of the frequency of re-hospitalization during the first week after discharge, the occurrence of complications, and third treatment line prescription (P-value = 0.644). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the obtained results, like hospitalization duration time (P-value = 0.512) it seems that levetiracetam can be used to substitute phenobarbital in treating neonatal abstinence syndrome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The current study has been registered in the Iran registry of clinical trials website (fa.irct.ir) on the date 25/2/2022 with registration no. IRCT20211218053444N2.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal , Extractos Vegetales , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Femenino , Humanos , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/diagnóstico , Levetiracetam/uso terapéutico , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Fenobarbital/uso terapéutico , HospitalizaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in posterior segment parameters in pediatric patients with epilepsy using sodium valproate or levetiracetam monotherapy for at least 12 months. METHODS: This study included 45 children with generalized epilepsy aged 6-17 years and 32 age- and gender-matched healthy subjects. The patients were assigned to three groups: Group 1 included patients using valproate monotherapy at a dose of 20-40 mg/kg/day, group 2 included patients using levetiracetam monotherapy at a dose of 20-40 mg/kg/day, and group 3 consisted of healthy controls. Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular ganglion cell layer-inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thicknesses were measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). RESULTS: No significant differences were noted between the groups regarding age, gender distribution, visual acuity, spherical equivalent, and intraocular pressure (p > 0.05). The average and temporal, nasal, and superior quadrants RNFL values were significantly thinner in group 1 than in group 2 (p = 0.001, p = 0.023, p = 0.011, and p = 0.001, respectively) and group 3 (p < 0.001, p = 0.032, p < 0.001, and p = 0.001, respectively). The OCT parameters were similar in groups 2 and 3 (p > 0.05). A negative correlation was observed in group 1 between only the average mGCIPL and the treatment dose (r = - 0.501). In group 2, no significant correlation was found between OCT parameters and the duration of epilepsy treatment, dose of treatment, and age at treatment onset values (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings support that there is an association between sodium valproate treatment and the reduction of RNFL thickness in epilepsy. Levetiracetam treatment appears to be a safe option, but care should be taken regarding ocular side effects that may occur with long-term and high-dose use of sodium valproate.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Ácido Valproico , Humanos , Niño , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéutico , Levetiracetam , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Retina , Voluntarios SanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Valproate should be avoided in pregnancy, but it is the most effective drug for generalized epilepsies. Alternative treatment may require combinations of other drugs. Our objectives were to describe first trimester use of antiseizure medication (ASM) combinations that are relevant alternatives to valproate and determine whether specific combinations were associated with a lower risk of major congenital malformations (MCM) compared with valproate monotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using linked national registers from Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden and administrative health care data from the United States and New South Wales, Australia. We described first trimester use of ASM combinations among pregnant people with epilepsy from 2000 to 2020. We compared the risk of MCM after first trimester exposure to ASM combinations vs valproate monotherapy and low-dose valproate plus lamotrigine or levetiracetam vs high-dose valproate (≥1,000 mg/d). We used log-binomial regression with propensity score weights to calculate adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% CIs for each dataset. Results were pooled using fixed-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Among 50,905 pregnancies in people with epilepsy identified from 7.8 million total pregnancies, 788 used lamotrigine and levetiracetam, 291 used lamotrigine and topiramate, 208 used levetiracetam and topiramate, 80 used lamotrigine and zonisamide, and 91 used levetiracetam and zonisamide. After excluding pregnancies with use of other ASMs, known teratogens, or a child diagnosed with MCM of infectious or genetic cause, we compared 587 exposed to lamotrigine-levetiracetam duotherapy and 186 exposed to lamotrigine-topiramate duotherapy with 1959 exposed to valproate monotherapy. Pooled aRRs were 0.41 (95% CI 0.24-0.69) and 1.26 (0.71-2.23), respectively. Duotherapy combinations containing low-dose valproate were infrequent, and comparisons with high-dose valproate monotherapy were inconclusive but suggested a lower risk for combination therapy. Other combinations were too rare for comparative safety analyses. DISCUSSION: Lamotrigine-levetiracetam duotherapy in first trimester was associated with a 60% lower risk of MCM than valproate monotherapy, while lamotrigine-topiramate was not associated with a reduced risk. Duotherapy with lamotrigine and levetiracetam may be favored to treat epilepsy in people with childbearing potential compared with valproate regarding MCM, but whether this combination is as effective as valproate remains to be determined. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that in people with epilepsy treated in the first trimester of pregnancy, the risk of major congenital malformations is lower with lamotrigine-levetiracetam duotherapy than with valproate alone, but similar with lamotrigine-topiramate.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Generalizada , Ácido Valproico , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios de Cohortes , Lamotrigina/uso terapéutico , Levetiracetam , Topiramato , Ácido Valproico/efectos adversos , Zonisamida , Recién Nacido , Combinación de MedicamentosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of statins, other than their hypocholesterolemia role, have been well documented, however, their use as an adjuvant drug with other antiseizure drugs, in the treatment of epilepsy is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the symbiotic effect of ATOR along with either lacosamide (LACO) or levetiracetam (LEVE) on experimentally induced epilepsy (Maximal electro-shock-MES or pentylenetetrazol- PTZ) in mice models. METHODS: Conventional elevated-maze (EPM) and rotarod methods were performed to observe the behavioral effects. RESULTS: In both the animal models, we found that co-administration of ATOR along with LACO showed a significant reduction in hind-limb extension (HLE) and clonic convulsion (CC) responses, respectively, but not in the ATOR+LEVE treated group. Intriguingly, comparable Straub tail response and myoclonic convulsion as the diazepam (DIA) group were observed only in the ATOR+LACO treated group. Moreover, a significant muscle-grip strength was observed in both groups. Also, pharmacokinetic analysis has indicated that the mean plasma concentration of ATOR peaked at 2nd hr in the presence of LACO but marginally peaked in the presence of LEVE. An Insilico study has revealed that ATOR has a higher binding affinity toward neuronal sodium channels. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that the plasma concentration of ATOR was potentiated in the presence of LACO, but not in the presence of LEVE and it has provided significant protection against both the electro and chemo-convulsive models in mice. This could be due to the symbiotic pharmacokinetic interplay of ATOR with LACO, and possibly, this interplay may interfere with sodium channel conductance.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Convulsiones , Ratones , Animales , Atorvastatina/uso terapéutico , Atorvastatina/farmacología , Levetiracetam , Lacosamida , Convulsiones/inducido químicamente , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
In women with epilepsy, antiepileptic drugs with low teratogenic risk should be used at the lowest dose necessary to control seizures. The medication adjustment and folic acid supplementation are started before pregnancy. Valproic acid should be avoided unless indispensable. Levetiracetam and lamotrigine are often used as less teratogenic agents. Moreover, appropriate information on possible changes in seizure frequency with pregnancy and childbirth preparation and breastfeeding should be provided. Generally, women taking antiepileptic drugs for epilepsy treatment may undergo natural delivery and breastfeeding. We should collaborate with obstetricians and other professionals to help ensure a safe environment for pregnancy and childbirth.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes , Epilepsia , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Convulsiones , Ácido Valproico , Levetiracetam/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Despite widespread monotherapy use of lamotrigine or levetiracetam during pregnancy, prospectively collected, blinded child development data are still limited. The NaME (Neurodevelopment of Babies Born to Mothers With Epilepsy) Study prospectively recruited a new cohort of women with epilepsy and their offspring for longitudinal follow-up. METHODS: Pregnant women of <21 weeks gestation (n = 401) were recruited from 21 hospitals in the UK. Data collection occurred during pregnancy (recruitment, trimester 3) and at 12 and 24 months of age. The primary outcome was blinded assessment of infant cognitive, language, and motor development on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (3rd edition) at 24 months of age with supplementary parent reporting on the Vinelands Adaptive Behavior Scales (2nd edition). RESULTS: There were 394 live births, with 277 children (70%) completing the Bayley assessment at 24 months. There was no evidence of an association of prenatal exposure to monotherapy lamotrigine (-.74, SE = 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -6.5 to 5.0, p = .80) or levetiracetam (-1.57, SE = 3.1, 95% CI = -4.6 to 7.7, p = .62) with poorer infant cognition, following adjustment for other maternal and child factors in comparison to nonexposed children. Similar results were observed for language and motor scores. There was no evidence of an association between increasing doses of either lamotrigine or levetiracetam. Nor was there evidence that higher dose folic acid supplementation (≥5 mg/day) or convulsive seizure exposure was associated with child development scores. Continued infant exposure to antiseizure medications through breast milk was not associated with poorer outcomes, but the number of women breastfeeding beyond 3 months was low. SIGNIFICANCE: These data are reassuring for infant development following in utero exposure to monotherapy lamotrigine or levetiracetam, but child development is dynamic, and future follow-up is required to rule out later emerging effects.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Lactante , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Lamotrigina/uso terapéutico , Levetiracetam/uso terapéutico , Levetiracetam/farmacología , Madres , Estudios Prospectivos , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Desarrollo Infantil , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
Guidelines do not support the combination of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and the antiepileptic drug levetiracetam, due to potential relevant P-glycoprotein (P-gp) mediated interaction that might result in decreased DOACs concentrations and increased thromboembolic risk. However, there is no systematic data on the safety of this combination. The aim of this study was to find patients concurrently treated with levetiracetam and DOAC, assess their plasma concentrations of DOAC, and the incidence of thromboembolic events. From our registry of patients on anticoagulation drugs we identified 21 patients concomitantly treated with levetiracetam and DOAC, 19 patients with atrial fibrillation and two patients with venous thromboembolism. Eight patients received dabigatran, 9 apixaban and 4 rivaroxaban. For each subject blood samples were collected for determination of trough DOAC and trough levetiracetam concentrations. The average age was 75 ± 9 years, 84% were males, HAS-BLED score was 1.8 ± 0.8, and in patients with atrial fibrillation CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.6 ± 2.0. The average trough concentration level of levetiracetam was 31.0 ± 34.5 mg/L. Median trough concentrations of DOACs were for dabigatran 72 (range 25-386) ng/mL, for rivaroxaban 47 (range 19-75) ng/mL, and for apixaban 139 (range 36-302) ng/mL. During the observation period of 1388 ± 994 days none of the patients suffered a thromboembolic event. Our results did not demonstrate a reduction in DOACs plasma levels during levetiracetam treatment, suggesting that levetiracetam could not be an important P-gp inducer in humans. DOAC in combination with levetiracetam remained effective therapy to protect against thromboembolic events.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Tromboembolia Venosa , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Rivaroxabán , Dabigatrán/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Levetiracetam/uso terapéutico , Piridonas , Tromboembolia Venosa/inducido químicamente , Administración Oral , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicacionesRESUMEN
RATIONALE: It is rare for uremia patients to have epileptic seizures after eating star fruit, only a dozen cases are reported worldwide. Such patients usually have poor prognoses. Few patients had good prognoses, all of them were treated with expensive renal replacement therapy. At present, there is no report on the addition of drug therapy to these patients based on the initial renal replacement therapy. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 67-year-old male patient with star fruit intoxication who had a history of diabetic nephropathy, hypertension, polycystic kidney, and chronic kidney disease in the uremic phase, and regular hemodialysis 3 times a week for 2 years. Initial clinical manifestations include hiccups, vomiting, speech disturbances, delayed reactions, and dizziness, which gradually progress to hearing and visual impairment, seizures, confusion, and coma. DIAGNOSES: This patient was diagnosed with seizures caused by star fruit intoxication. The experience of eating star fruit and the electroencephalograms can prove our diagnosis. INTERVENTIONS: We performed intensive renal replacement therapy according to the recommendations in the literature. However, his symptoms did not improve significantly until he received an extra dose of levetiracetam and resumed his previous dialysis schedule. OUTCOMES: The patient was discharged after 21 days without neurologic sequelae. Five months after discharge, he was readmitted due to poor seizure control. LESSONS: To improve the prognosis of these patients and to reduce their financial burden, the use of antiepileptic drugs should be emphasized.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes , Frutas , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Diálisis Renal , Convulsiones/inducido químicamente , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , LevetiracetamRESUMEN
This article describes the pathophysiology and potential treatments for Gulf War Illness (GWI), which is a chronic neuropsychiatric illness linked to a combination of chemical exposures experienced by service personnel during the first Gulf War in 1991. However, there is currently no effective treatment for veterans with GWI. The article focuses on the current status and efficacy of existing therapeutic interventions in preclinical models of GWI, as well as potential perspectives of promising therapies. GWI stems from changes in brain and peripheral systems in veterans, leading to neurocognitive deficits, as well as physiological and psychological effects resulting from multifaceted changes such as neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and neuronal damage. Aging not only renders veterans more susceptible to GWI symptoms, but also attenuates their immune capabilities and response to therapies. A variety of experimental models are being used to investigate the pathophysiology and develop therapies that have the ability to alleviate devastating symptoms. Over two dozen therapeutic interventions targeting neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, neuronal injury, and neurogenesis are being tested, including agents such as curcumin, curcumin nanoparticles, monosodium luminol, melatonin, resveratrol, fluoxetine, rolipram, oleoylethanolamide, ketamine, levetiracetam, nicotinamide riboside, minocycline, pyridazine derivatives, and neurosteroids. Preclinical outcomes show that some agents have promise, including curcumin, resveratrol, and ketamine, which are being tested in clinical trials in GWI veterans. Neuroprotectants and other compounds such as monosodium luminol, melatonin, levetiracetam, oleoylethanolamide, and nicotinamide riboside appear promising for future clinical trials. Neurosteroids have been shown to have neuroprotective and disease-modifying properties, which makes them a promising medicine for GWI. Therefore, accelerated clinical studies are urgently needed to evaluate and launch an effective therapy for veterans displaying GWI.
Asunto(s)
Curcumina , Ketamina , Melatonina , Neuroesteroides , Síndrome del Golfo Pérsico , Veteranos , Humanos , Guerra del Golfo , Enfermedades Neuroinflamatorias , Luminol , Levetiracetam , Resveratrol , Terapias en InvestigaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Levetiracetam (LVT), while an effective treatment for multiple seizure types, is associated with a high incidence of neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs). In predominantly retrospective studies, supplementation with pyridoxine/vitamin B6 (PN) was associated with improvement in NPAEs in some people. A previous review highlighted a lack of double-blind, controlled trials of PN for the treatment of NPAEs in individuals treated with LVT. The current paper updates the findings from the previous review to include evidence from studies published since June 2019. METHODS: An updated systematic review of the published literature was performed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched to identify studies published between June 2019 and 2nd November 2022 in which supplementary PN was initiated for the treatment of LVT-associated NPAEs. All study types were eligible. The risk of bias in randomized trials was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. RESULTS: Seven additional studies were identified: two double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), four retrospective studies, and one retrospective case series. One RCT reported significant improvements from baseline in behavioral adverse events (BAEs) in both the intervention (PN) group and the low-dose control group (both p < 0.05), with a significantly greater improvement in the intervention group (p < 0.001). In the second RCT, differences in BAE severity between PN and placebo groups at the endpoint were not statistically significant. In one retrospective study, subjective irritability was reported to have improved from baseline in 9/20 individuals (45%) treated with supplementary PN. Data for systematic assessments (PHQ-9 and GAD-7) were available for 10 individuals. Assessment by PHQ-9 showed that six individuals improved, two worsened and two had no change. Based on the GAD-7, three people improved, two worsened and five had no change. In the second retrospective study, 18/41 individuals (44%) who commenced PN following the emergence of BAEs showed "significant" improvement. In a separate group of individuals with pre-existing behavioral problems in whom PN treatment was initiated at the same time as commencing LVT, 3/18 (16.7%) developed BAEs. This compared with 79/458 people (17.2%) who were initially treated only with LVT. The third retrospective study compared treatment-related irritability in individuals who had been treated with both LVT and perampanel, either sequentially or concomitantly. Two people who developed irritability while receiving LVT monotherapy were able to continue treatment with the addition of PN. The fourth study reported a significantly lower LVT discontinuation rate in individuals taking PN and a higher rate of improved behavior in those who were able to continue LVT. The case series reported improvements in behavioral symptoms in six people within two to three weeks of commencing supplementary PN. CONCLUSION: Data published within the last three years add to earlier evidence suggesting that PN might be effective in the treatment of NPAEs associated with LVT. However, the quality of evidence remains poor and only a few prospective trials have been published. Data from placebo-controlled trials are still largely lacking. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to justify any firm recommendation for PN supplementation to treat NPAEs associated with LVT. Further well-designed, prospective trials are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Piridoxina , Humanos , Levetiracetam/efectos adversos , Piridoxina/uso terapéutico , Vitamina B 6/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Multiple interventions have been studied for benzodiazepine-resistant status epilepticus (SE) in children and adults. This review aimed to summarize the available evidence and provide estimates of comparative effectiveness and ranking of treatment effects. METHODS: All randomized controlled trials studying patients (>1 month of age) with benzodiazepine-resistant SE were included. Outcomes including seizure cessation within 60 min, seizure freedom for 24 h, death, respiratory depression warranting intubation and cardiovascular instability were studied. Conventional and network meta-analyses (NMA) were done. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included (16 in NMA). Phenobarbital and high-dose levetiracetam were significantly superior to phenytoin with respect to seizure cessation within 60 min. Network ranking demonstrated that phenobarbital had the highest probability of being the best among the studied interventions followed by high-dose levetiracetam and high-dose valproate. Network meta-analysis was limited by predominant indirect evidence and high heterogeneity.On pairwise comparisons, phenobarbital was found to be associated with a higher risk of need for intubation and cardiovascular instability. Levetiracetam had a better safety profile than fosphenytoin. CONCLUSIONS: Based on low quality evidence, phenobarbital appears to be the most effective agent for seizure cessation within 60 min of administration in patients with benzodiazepine resistant status epilepticus. High-dose levetiracetam, high-dose valproate and fosphenytoin are probably equally effective. Choice of medication may be guided by effectiveness, safety concerns, availability, cost and systemic co-morbidities.
Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Estado Epiléptico , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/farmacología , Levetiracetam/uso terapéutico , Metaanálisis en Red , Fenobarbital/uso terapéutico , Fenitoína/uso terapéutico , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Levetiracetam (LEV) is an anti-seizure medication (ASM) known to have significant behavioral side effects in children with epilepsy. These side effects may be improved by supplemental vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) use. Our research aimed to study risk factors for LEV side effects and the role of vitamin B6 in altering this risk. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the demographic and clinical profile of all pediatric patients on LEV treatment between July 2019 and December 2020. T-tests, Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to assess predictors of LEV discontinuation. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: 150/240 (62%) children were on additional medications besides LEV for epilepsy management. Thirty-five percent children reported side effects, especially behavioral and mood concerns. Of the patients who reported side effects on LEV, 71% were taking vitamin B6 (n = 59). The rate of LEV discontinuation was significantly lower for children on vitamin B6 than children not taking B6, regardless of monotherapy or polypharmacy (49% v 88% respectively, p = 0.001). Over half of the patients who were able to remain on LEV reported improved behavior with B6 supplementation as compared to those who were unable to continue LEV (17/30, 57% versus 0/26, 0%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Levetiracetam side effects significantly impact the tolerability of this ASM in children with epilepsy. Our results suggest that vitamin B6 supplementation can significantly reduce the odds of discontinuing LEV due to its behavioral side effects.
Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Epilepsia , Piracetam , Anticonvulsivantes , Niño , Humanos , Levetiracetam , Piridoxina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vitamina B 6RESUMEN
The prevalence of epilepsy in the world population together with a high percentage of patients resistant to existing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) stimulates the constant search for new approaches to the treatment of the disease. Previously a significant anticonvulsant potential of cardiac glycoside digoxin has been verified by enhancing a weak activity of AEDs in low doses under screening models of seizures induced by pentylenetetrazole and maximal electroshock. The aim of the present study is to investigate the influence of digoxin at a sub-cardiotonic dose on the anticonvulsant activity of valproate, levetiracetam, and topiramate in models of primary generalized seizures with different neurochemical mechanisms. A total of 264 random-bred male albino mice have been used. AEDs were administered 30 min before seizure induction once intragastrically at conditionally effective (ED50) and sub-effective (½ ED50) doses: sodium valproate and topiramate - at doses of 300 and 150 mg/kg; levetiracetam - at doses of 100 and 50 mg/kg. Digoxin was administered once subcutaneously at a dose of 0.8 mg/kg body weight (1/10 LD50) 10-15 min before seizure induction. Picrotoxin (aqueous solution 2.5 mg/kg, subcutaneously), thiosemicarbazide (aqueous solution 25 mg/kg, intraperitoneally), strychnine (aqueous solution 1.2 mg/kg, subcutaneously), camphor (oil solution 1000 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) have been used as convulsive agents for seizure induction. It was found that under the conditions of primary generalized seizures induced by picrotoxin, thiosemicarbazide, strychnine, and camphor, digoxin not only shows its own strong anticonvulsant activity but also significantly enhances the anticonvulsant potential of classical AEDs sodium valproate, levetiracetam, and topiramate. The obtained results substantiate the expediency of further in-depth study of digoxin as an anticonvulsant drug, in particular, the in-depth study of neurochemical mechanisms of its action.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes , Digoxina , Levetiracetam , Convulsiones , Topiramato , Ácido Valproico , Animales , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Alcanfor/uso terapéutico , Cardiotónicos/uso terapéutico , Digoxina/uso terapéutico , Levetiracetam/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Ratones , Picrotoxina , Convulsiones/inducido químicamente , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Convulsiones/prevención & control , Estricnina , Topiramato/uso terapéutico , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Objectives: Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder that is characterized by episodes of seizure. Methods: In this study, patients with status epilepticus in the Intensive Care Unit of the Department of Neurology of Qujing First People's Hospital were collected and treated with levetiracetam injection, continuous bedside EEG monitoring (cEEG) technology, and quantitative EEG (qEEG) technique. The inhibitory effects of different doses of levetiracetam injection and sodium valproate on abnormal discharge, the improvement of clinical symptoms, the incidence of adverse reactions, and prognosis were monitored, analyzed, and compared. Results: Compared with the experimental group of sodium valproate, 1000 mg/d levetiracetam group and 1500 mg/d levetiracetam group had a high probability of successful symptom control and a short control time. The patients had a low recurrence rate and a long recurrence time, and the probability of abnormal discharge in EEG was low. Conclusions: The recording results showed that levetiracetam could significantly inhibit the abnormal discharge of patients. Compared with sodium valproate, high-dose levetiracetam is a drug with a rapid effect, good effect, and long action time.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Ácido Valproico , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Levetiracetam/efectos adversos , Levetiracetam/uso terapéutico , Fenitoína/efectos adversos , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tremor is a relatively common symptom in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). It can negatively affect several aspects of the patients' life and is one of the most disabling symptoms in MS. Pharmacological treatment of MS-related tremor was studied for several years, though treatment is still challenging. This study will review all studies on the pharmacological treatment of tremor in MS and update the treatment recommendations. METHODS: Any relevant English-language clinical trial that investigated the pharmacological treatment of MS-related tremor in adults was eligible in this study. We searched Medline (PubMed), Scopus, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Bias assessment was performed by the CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) checklist. All methods followed PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: The initial search resulted in 3024 articles; 26 articles were included as eligible studies, 13 articles had a low risk of bias, and remained for full manuscript review. The results of studies on 5-HT3 receptor antagonists as a single dose treatment were inconsistent. Botulinum toxin A had significant effects on MS-related tremor, but adverse effects and injection procedures limited its application. The application of cannabis-based medicine to treat MS-related tremor could not be recommended due to inconclusive therapeutic effects and several side effects. Levetiracetam had inconsistent results, and other anti-epileptic drugs were not studied precisely. Isoniazid has minor therapeutic effects and possible adverse effects in the treatment of MS-related tremor. CONCLUSION: Further well-designed comparative clinical trials with a large sample size can improve clinical management of tremor in patients with MS.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Esclerosis Múltiple , Adulto , Humanos , Levetiracetam/uso terapéutico , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Temblor/tratamiento farmacológico , Temblor/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To systematically collect, critically evaluate, and synthesize current evidence with respect to the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of levetiracetam as mono- or adjunctive therapy for children and adolescents with all types of epilepsy. METHODS: The presentation of methods and results in this systematic review was performed according to the evaluation guidelines for health care interventions provided in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol. Literature retrieval will use the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, China Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wanfang Database, and Ongoing Clinical Trials Database.The risk of bias of included studies is estimated by taking into consideration the characteristics including random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of patients, blinding of outcome assessment, completeness of outcome data, selective reporting and other bias by Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Data synthesis and analyses are performed using RevMan 5.4 software. RESULTS: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: Levetiracetam seems to be effective and safe for the treatment of pediatric epilepsy.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Levetiracetam/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Revisiones Sistemáticas como AsuntoRESUMEN
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disease which affects more than 40 million people worldwide with progressive loss of memory and cognitive functions. It is reported, persistent AD is also one of the main causes of epilepsy in elders and comorbidity of both these will contribute to worsening the health status of AD patients. Recently, herbal plants with potent neuroprotective and antioxidant properties were used for increasing the quality of life in neurodegenerative disease patients. The present study was conceptualized to access the protective effect of Ocimum sanctum extract (OSE) and Levetiracetam (LEV) and their combination (OSE+LEV) against AD and epilepsy associated with AD in the rat AD model. AD was induced in aged male Wistar albino rats with Amyloid-ß (Aß) by intracerebroventricular administration. The results reveal, treatment with OSE, LEV and OSE+LEV significantly reversed the memory impairment, increases the BDNF expressions and decreases AChE activity in Aß induced AD animals. Expression of A-ß and p-tau in the hippocampus was significantly reduced in treatment group when compared to the control animals. Treatment with OSE and OSE+LEV also restored the hippocampal architecture by ameliorating the neuronal count in CA1, CA3 and DG regions. It also observed that treatment has decreased the excitoneurotoxicity evidenced by decreased glutamate and increased GABA levels and thus provided protection against epilepsy. Treatment groups also exhibited a potent antioxidant activity when tested endogenous antioxidant enzymes SOD, GSH and LPO in the brain hippocampus. Our findings provide evidence for use of OSE, LEV and OSE+LEV against AD and epilepsy associated with AD in Aß induced AD animal model. However, further clinical studies are required to prove the use of OSE, LEV and OSE+LEV in the management of AD and AD-associated epilepsy in human volunteers.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Disfunción Cognitiva , Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas , Fármacos Neuroprotectores , Anciano , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Hipocampo , Humanos , Levetiracetam/farmacología , Masculino , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/farmacología , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/uso terapéutico , Ocimum sanctum , Extractos Vegetales/farmacología , Extractos Vegetales/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Ratas , Ratas WistarRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Levetiracetam (LEV, 5-100 mg/kg) has been shown to prevent audiogenic seizures in a dose-dependent manner. This chemical is known to bind to synaptic vesicle protein 2A and inhibit l-type calcium channels, affecting neurotransmitter release. We hypothesize that the drug prevents audiogenic seizures partially by affecting cochlear neural response. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, rats were given 1000, 500, 50, or 0 mg/kg (saline control) LEV-injection. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE), reflecting outer hair cell (OHC) function, and cochlear compound action potentials (CAP), reflecting cochlear neural output, were recorded and compared pre- and post-LEV. RESULTS: 1000 mg/kg LEV-injection did not significantly affect DPOAE. The high dose LEV-injection, however, significantly reduced CAP amplitude resulting threshold shift (TS), prolonged CAP latency, and enhanced CAP forward masking. CAP latency and forward masking were significantly affected at the 500 mg/kg dose, but CAP-TS remained unchanged after LEV-injection. Interestingly, CAP latency wassignificantly prolonged, at least at the low stimulation levels, although the amplitude of CAP remained constant after a clinical dose of LEV-injection (50 mg/kg). DISCUSSION: Since the clinical dose of LEV-injection does not reduce CAP amplitude, the reduction of cochlear neural output is unlikely to be the underlying mechanism of LEV in the treatment of audiogenic seizure. The delayed cochlear neural response may be partially related to the prevention of audiogenic seizure. However, neuropharmacological changes in the central nervous system must play a major role in the treatment of audiogenic seizure, as it does in the treatment of focal epilepsy.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Refleja , Piracetam , Animales , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacología , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia Refleja/metabolismo , Levetiracetam , Piracetam/metabolismo , Piracetam/farmacología , Ratas , Vesículas SinápticasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Data of large pregnancy registries have improved the recommendations for women with epilepsy before pregnancy. Monotherapy containing antiepileptic drugs with a low malformation rate (lamotrigine or levetiracetam) is recommended as well as preconceptional folic acid supplementation, while valproic acid should be avoided. The practicability of these recommendations remains controversial. METHODS: Retrospective case series of 160 women with epilepsy over a period of 5 years who were advised in our outpatient department before and during pregnancy. RESULTS: Only 18.9% of women presented with valproic acid. Even without valproic acid, complications or emergency admissions rarely occurred under specialist supervision. In our case series, lamotrigine proved to be less effective and less controllable than other drugs during pregnancy. Levetiracetam also has a low malformation rate, but showed a better effect on seizure outcome during pregnancy than lamotrigine. Only 12% of women who wanted to have children took folic acid. CONCLUSION: This case series comes from a tertiary center; the referred women were mainly accompanied by neurologists with special expertise in epileptology. In this group valproate could be avoided in most cases. Lamotrigine is probably less effective due to the drop in blood levels during pregnancy. Levetiracetam seems to be a good alternative, working well against focal and generalized seizures. Folic acid may be taken later than recommended.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Consejo , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Ácido Fólico/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Lamotrigina/uso terapéutico , Levetiracetam/uso terapéutico , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Levetiracetam (LEV) is an antiepileptic recommended during pregnancy. Bacopa monneri is a medicinal herb used in Ayurveda for improvement of cognition. Data on effects of LEV and Bacopa on cognition is inadequate. The study evaluated the cognitive effects of LEV on rat offspring of dams exposed to LEV and whether pretreatment with Bacopa monnieri, inhibits the potential cognitive decline by LEV. METHODS: Pregnant rats were allocated into four groups of three rats each. Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 received 2% gum acacia, LEV 270 mg/kg, LEV 270 mg/kg + Bacopa 100 mg/kg and LEV 270 mg/kg + Bacopa 200 mg/kg respectively during pregnancy and lactation. Three pups from all dams were chosen at random and exposed to passive avoidance, Hebb-Williams and Morris water maze tests to check for their cognition and relevant histopathology was done. RESULTS: In the passive avoidance model groups 3 and 4, showed an increase in escape latency compared with group 2, demonstrating an improved learning (p=0.05). In Hebb-Williams maze, the time taken to reach reward chamber by group 2 increased compared to group 1, p=0.006, showing cognitive decline. Neuronal count in hippocampus and prefrontal cortex decreased significantly in group 2, which improved in group 3 & 4 however there was distortion of architecture in group 4. CONCLUSIONS: LEV exposure in intrauterine and neonatal period induced cognitive decline in rat offsprings and Bacopa 100 mg/kg prevented LEV induced cognitive decline. However safety of exposure to Bacopa during the gestation period has to be evaluated.