Intravenous route for folate supplementation in a patient with celiac disease treated by pemetrexed-based chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Oral folic acid supplementation is essential for patients treated with pemetrexed, to prevent the risk of severe hematologic toxicity. In case of intestinal absorption disorder, no recommendations exist for intravenous folic acid supplementation. CASE REPORT: We describe a 74-year-old patient with multimetastatic non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma, receiving first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin AUC5, pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. The patient presented neglected celiac disease, resulting in malabsorption syndrome with iron and folic acid deficiency. The question was how to administer folic acid supplementation during the pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES: Intravenous injection of 200 mg levoleucovorin on day 1 of cycle 1 of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy was administered and well tolerated. During the second cycle, the levoleucovorin perfusion was not renewed by omission. The patient was hospitalized for 7 days because of febrile aplasia. Piperacillin-tazobactam was started, and then switched to amoxicillin-clavulanate plus ciprofloxacin. After this episode of post-chemotherapy febrile aplasia, it was decided to systematically supplement the patient with intravenous levoleucovorin, with blood folate concentration monitoring at each cycle. At 16 months after start of treatment, the patient was in complete remission, indicating that the immune-chemotherapy was effective, with no further febrile neutropenia. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This case report highlights intravenous levoleucovorin supplementation as an alternative to oral folic acid if needed during pemetrexed-antifolate-based chemotherapy.

A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic investigation of Modufolin® compared to Isovorin® after single dose intravenous administration to patients with colon cancer: a randomized study.

PURPOSE: Leucovorin is commonly used as folate supplement in 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, but needs to be converted to active 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate (methyleneTHF) intracellularly. This provides for interindividual differences. MethyleneTHF has recently been developed into the stable, distributable drug, Modufolin®. The aim was to compare the concentration of folate metabolites in tumor, mucosa, and plasma of patients with colon cancer after administration of Modufolin® or Isovorin® (levo-leucovorin). METHODS: Thirty-two patients scheduled for colon resection were randomized to receive Modufolin® or Isovorin® at dosage of 60 or 200 mg/m². The study drug was given as one i.v. bolus injection after anesthesia. Plasma was collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis before, during, and after surgery. Tissue biopsies were collected at surgery. Folate metabolites were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. RESULTS: MethyleneTHF and THF concentrations were significantly higher in mucosa (p < 0.01, both dosages) and tumors (p < 0.01, 200 mg/m²) after Modufolin® as compared to Isovorin® administration. The results correlated with PK observations. The Modufolin® to Isovorin® C(max) ratio for methyleneTHF was 113 at 200 mg/m² and 52 at 60 mg/m²; the AUC(last) ratios were 17 and 9, respectively. The THF plasma concentrations were also higher after Modufolin® administration (C(max) ratio 23, AUC(last) ratio 13 at 200 mg/m²; C(max) ratio 15, AUC(last) ratio 11 at 60 mg/m²). CONCLUSION: Modufolin® administration resulted in significantly higher methyleneTHF levels than Isovorin® and may potentially increase the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. The results encourage further evaluation of Modufolin® as a substitute to Isovorin® including the potential clinical benefits.

Local recurrence of gastric cancer after total gastrectomy: an unusual presentation.

A 71 years old Italian man had type 3 gastric cancer of the greater curvature. Total gastrectomy with splenectomy and D2 lymph node dissection were performed. After discharge chemotherapy ELF regimen was administered for 6 months. After 16 months from the operation a local recurrence was discovered by CT scan. Surgical en-bloc resection was performed removing pancreatic tail, splenic colic flexure and a portion of left diaphragm. Histological examination confirmed local recurrence of gastric adenocarcinoma infiltrating pancreas, colon and diaphragm with lymph node metastasis.

Folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and etoposide after curative resection for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy with etoposide, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (ELF) in gastric cancer patients undergoing previous surgery with a curative intent. METHODOLOGY: The clinical outcome of 49 patients with resected gastric cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy was compared with that of 85 surgically treated historical controls who did not receive any adjuvant treatment. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of six cycles of daily 1-hour intravenous infusions of folinic acid 100 mg/m2 and 5-FU 400 mg/ m2, and a 2-hour infusion of etoposide 100 mg/m2, for three days every 28 days. RESULTS: The 5-year relapse-free survival was 32% in the adjuvant arm and 27% in the control arm (p = 0.6). At the last follow-up, there were 32 deaths in the adjuvant arm and 60 in the control arm. The median duration of survival was respectively 23 and 19 months, and the 5-year survival rates were 34% and 29% (p = 0.4). The chemotherapy was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that ELF adjuvant treatment is a safe and well tolerable combination chemotherapy in patients with resected gastric cancer, but it does not seem to improve prognosis in comparison with historical controls.

Randomised phase II evaluation of irinotecan plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (ILF) vs 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and etoposide (ELF) in untreated metastatic gastric cancer.

An open-label randomised comparison of efficacy and tolerability of irinotecan plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) (ILF) with etoposide plus 5-FU/LV (ELF) in patients with untreated metastatic or locally advanced gastric cancer. One cycle of ILF comprised six once-weekly infusions of irinotecan 80 mg m(-2), LV 500 mg m(-2), 24-h 5-FU 2000 mg m(-2), and ELF comprised three once-daily doses of etoposide 120 mg m(-2), LV 300 mg m(-2), 5-FU 500 mg m(-2). In all, 56 patients received ILF and 58 ELF. Median age was 62 years, Karnofsky performance 90%, and disease status was comparable for both arms. The objective clinical response rates after 14 weeks treatment (primary end point) were 30% for ILF and 17% for ELF (risk ratio (RR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-1.13, P = 0.0766). Overall response rates over the entire treatment period for ILF and ELF were 43 and 24%, respectively (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.97; P = 0.0467). For ILF and ELF, respectively, median progression-free survival was 4.5 vs 2.3 months, time to treatment failure was 3.6 vs 2.2 months (P = 0.4542), and overall survival was 10.8 vs 8.3 months (P = 0.2818). Both regimens were well tolerated, the main grade 3/4 toxicities being diarrhoea (18%, ILF) and neutropenia (57%, ELF). The data from this randomised phase II study indicate that ILF provides a better response rate than ELF, and that ILF should be investigated further for the treatment of metastatic gastric cancer.

Final results of a randomized phase III trial of sequential high-dose methotrexate, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin versus etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil versus infusional fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer: A trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of etoposide, leucovorin, and bolus fluorouracil (ELF) or infusional fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FUP) with that of the reference protocol of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate (FAMTX) in advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 399 patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach were randomized and analyzed for toxicity, tumor response, and progression-free and overall survival. Only reviewed and confirmed responses were considered. The analysis of remission was based on assessable patients with documented measurable lesions. The intent-to-treat principle, log-rank test, and Cox regression model were used for the statistical analysis of time-to-event end points. RESULTS: The overall response rate for 245 eligible patients with measurable disease was 9% with ELF, 20% with FUP, and 12% with FAMTX, with no significant differences. One hundred twelve patients were eligible for efficacy in assessable, nonmeasurable disease. No change was observed in 66% of patients treated with ELF, 56% with FUP, and 55% with FAMTX. Two patients achieved a complete tumor regression (one each for ELF and FAMTX). With a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, the median survival times were 7.2 months with ELF, 7.2 months with FUP, and 6.7 months with FAMTX, respectively, with no significant differences. Nonhematologic and hematologic toxicities of ELF, FUP, and FAMTX were acceptable, with neutropenia being the major toxicity for all three regimens. Seven treatment-related deaths occurred (two with FUP and five with FAMTX). CONCLUSION: All three investigated regimens demonstrate modest clinical efficacy and should not be regarded as standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer. New strategies should be considered to achieve a better clinical efficacy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with P-ELF (cisplatin, etoposide, leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil) followed by radical resection in patients with initially unresectable gastric adenocarcinoma: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is the most frequent gastrointestinal cancer in Mexico. Only 33% of cases are resectable. Our aim was to determine the activity and toxicity of the cisplatin, etoposide, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil combination in initially unresectable tumors and to determine its ability to permit resection. METHODS: Sixty patients with unresectable gastric adenocarcinoma were treated with cisplatin 80 mg/m2, etoposide 80 mg/m2, leucovorin 25 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m2 by central intravenous catheter for 4 consecutive days. Two courses of this combination were followed by surgical resection. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 36.8% (20 partial responses and one complete response). By using logistic regression analysis, the tumor, node, and metastasis stage (risk ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-4.02; P = .039) was identified as the response determinant to chemotherapy. Major toxicity was grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 67% of patients. Ten resections were performed (17.5%); five were curative and five palliative. Operative morbidity and mortality rates were 40% and 10%, respectively. The median length of survival was 7.46 and 13.3 months for nonresponders and responders, respectively (P = .011). CONCLUSIONS: The cisplatin, etoposide, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil combination is active in advanced gastric cancer and the toxicity level is acceptable. This treatment permits a 17.5% resection rate in previously unresectable tumors. A randomized trial of surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery is warranted.