To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dezocine combined with lidocaine in local anesthesia for percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration.

A total of 130 patients who underwent percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration from March 2021 to February 2023 were randomly divided into a Dezocine group and a control group. The Dezocine group received a muscle injection of 0.05mg/kg Dezocine 30 minutes before surgery, while the control group received a muscle injection of 0.01ml/kg normal saline. Both groups received 3ml of 2% lidocaine for spermatic cord block anesthesia. The anesthesia onset time, anesthesia duration, numeric rating scale (NRS) score, anesthesia satisfaction rate and incidence of adverse reactions were recorded and compared between the two groups. The statistical results showed that there were significant differences between the two groups in terms of anesthesia onset time, anesthesia duration, anesthesia satisfaction rate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use within 24 hours after surgery and NRS scores at 15 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours after surgery. The incidence of adverse reactions in the Dezocine group was lower than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The combination of Dezocine and lidocaine for spermatic cord block anesthesia during percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration is safe, effective and associated with fewer adverse reactions. It is suitable for clinical application and promotion in reproductive medicine outpatient surgery.

Topical ropivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% and lidocaine hydrochloride 2% significantly reduce corneal sensitivity without short-term negative side effects in horses.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate corneal sensitivity and acute side effects following application of ropivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% and lidocaine hydrochloride 2% on the healthy equine cornea. ANIMALS STUDIED: Eight healthy adult horses. PROCEDURE: A randomized, masked, crossover study design was utilized. Baseline Semiquantitative Preclinical Ocular Toxicology (SPOT) scores and corneal touch thresholds (CTT) using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer were recorded and measured, respectively, for eight healthy adult horses before medication application. Commercially available eyewash was used as a negative control. Ropivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% or lidocaine hydrochloride 2% solution was sprayed on a randomly selected eye, and the contralateral eye received eyewash. CTT was measured in both eyes at 1, 5, 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, and 75 min post-application. Post-application SPOT scores were recorded immediately following the trial. Linear mixed model statistical analyses (mean ± standard error) were performed (p < .05). RESULTS: Mean eyewash CTT (3.41 cm ± 0.464) was significantly different from ropivacaine-treated (1.44 cm ± 0.562) (p = .008) and lidocaine-treated eyes (1.75 cm ± 0.562) (p = .024); CTT was not significantly different between drug groups (p = .88). Time to maximum anesthesia was not significantly different between ropivacaine (13.25 min ± 3.353) and lidocaine (16.25 min ± 3.353) (p = .40). No side effects were appreciated as confirmed by SPOT. CONCLUSIONS: Ropivacaine and lidocaine similarly decreased corneal sensitivity when applied topically without clinically evident short-term ocular side effects. Lidocaine may be preferable in clinical settings due to its large, multi-use vials and similar effects to ropivacaine.

The Value of Injection Therapy with Botulinum Toxin in Pain Treatment of Primary Chronic Anal Fissures Compared to Anal Dilation, and Local Nifedipine in Combination with Lidocaine.

Introduction: Anal fissure is a longitudinal tear of the mucosa of the anal canal extending from the outer anal orifice in the direction of the dentate line of the inner anal opening. Fissures are divided into primary and secondary, and acute or chronic. Besides minimal rectal bleeding, itching and soiling, primary chronic anal fissures (PCAF) manifest with anal pain as theirs main determinant. It is described as the most troubling symptom. Aim: To compare the effect of injection therapy with botulinum toxin A (ITBT) vs. anal dilation (AD), and local nifedipine with lidocaine (LNL) in pain treatment of PCAF. Materials and Methods: This controlled retrospective prospective longitudinal study covered 94 patients, divided in 3 groups. The first was treated with ITBT, the second with AD and third using LNL (31, 33 and 30 patients respectively). Clostridium botulinum toxin A was used, dissolved with saline to concentration of 200 U/ml. The solution was applied to both sides of PCAF at dose of 40U. Modified technique of AD was done using 3 fingers of a single hand, progressively introduced into the anal canal, followed by gradual lateral distraction during 1 min. LNL therapy was conducted using nifedipine (0.3%) with lidocaine (1.5%) ointment, applied twice daily for 3 weeks. To measure pain, a visual analog scale (VAS) was used. The follow-up period was 12 weeks with checkup at week 4. Results: The median age of participants was 46.6±13.9 years (50 males vs. 44 females). The type of therapy had a significantly different effect on pain at week 4 (p=0.0003). Severe pain was present in only 2 ITBT patients, 16 AD, and 6 LNL patients. Post hoc analyses showed different pain disappearance time by week 12 (p <0.0001). The mean time was shortest in ITBT group (6.1±1.5 weeks). Anal pain intensity significantly differed among the 3 groups (Fisher exact, p=0.002). Namely, 71% in ITBT group rated the pain as weakest (VAS score 1) compared to 18.2% in AD and 30% of patients in LNL group. The overall pain reduction significance was in favor of ITBT, due to the differences between the ITBT and AD groups (p=0.00024) and ITBT compared to LNL group (p=0.018). Conclusion: ITBT is superior to AD and LNL in reducing pain in PCAF.

A Patient with Known Allergy to Local Anesthesia Presenting for a Dental Restoration.

Dentists should be equipped to treat an allergic reaction in a dental office, and in this scenario, the potential allergic reaction is noted after administration of a common local anesthetic lidocaine with epinephrine. The allergic reaction quickly escalates to a full-blown anaphylaxis, and the management of such an episode is detailed in this article.

A Comparative Analysis of Local Anesthetics: Injection Associated Pain and Duration of Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Local anesthesia administration is frequently the most painful step of dermatologic surgery. Identification of an anesthetic that minimizes infiltration pain and toxicity while maximizing duration of action would improve both patient satisfaction and procedural safety. This study compared eight local anesthetic solutions to identify the composition that minimizes infiltration pain, maximizes duration of effect, and minimizes amount of local anesthetic needed. METHODS: In a double-blinded study, thirty subjects were injected with eight local anesthetic solutions of varied concentrations of lidocaine, epinephrine, benzyl alcohol, and sodium bicarbonate. Infiltration pain was rated by subjects using a visual analog scale and duration of anesthesia was assessed by needle prick sensation every 15 minutes. RESULTS: Solutions 2, 7, and 8, were significantly less painful (P<0.001), though not statistically different from each other. Two of the three solutions were buffered 10:1 with sodium bicarbonate. Additionally, two of the three contained notably decreased concentrations of lidocaine, 0.091% and 0.083%, than traditionally used in practice. The use of benzyl alcohol did not result in a reduction of reported pain. The duration of action was equal among the solutions regardless of anesthetic concentration. CONCLUSIONS: A solution of 0.091% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:1,100,000 and 0.82% benzyl alcohol reduces medication dose while ensuring maximum patient comfort and, theoretically, increases shelf life. While considered off-label, clinically effective dermal anesthesia may be obtained at a lower concentration of lidocaine and epinephrine than is commonly used, aiding conservative use of local anesthetic, particularly during times of national shortage. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(4): doi:10.36849/JDD.5183 Citation: Moses A, Klager S, Weinstein A, et al. A comparative analysis of local anesthetics: Injection associated pain and duration of anesthesia. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(4):364-368. doi:10.36849/JDD.5183.

Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration with or without Palatal Injection for Posterior Maxillary Teeth Extraction - A Split-Mouth Randomized Trial

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of posterior maxillary teeth extraction buccal infiltration with or without the use of palatal injection. Material and Methods: A total of 70 patients underwent extraction of bilateral maxillary posterior teeth under 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with 1:2,00000 adrenaline infiltration in this single-centric split-mouth randomized trial. The test side was administered with a buccal infiltration of 2 mL of anesthetic alone. An extended waiting period of 10 minutes was given before the commencement of the procedure. A standard protocol was followed for the control side. A single operator performed all extractions. Results: A total of 140 posterior maxillary teeth were extracted. Patients marked pain perception on a visual analogue scale in three different instances. During the administration of injections for the test side, the pain score was less than that of the control side and was statistically significant. The overall pain during the extraction procedure was comparable and statistically insignificant. The overall success of the method was 90%. Conclusion: Extraction of posterior maxillary teeth was feasible with a single buccal infiltration without palatal injection in most cases using an extended waiting period. Dentists can attempt extraction without palatal injections with optimal success. However, the alternate technique could be used when there is a necessity for rescue palatal anesthesia.

A Case of Wide QRS Tachycardia After the Local Administration of Epinephrine to Reduce Bleeding During General Anesthesia.

We report a case of wide QRS tachycardia or ventricular tachycardia with a pulse after the administration of epinephrine under general anesthesia. After induction and achieving a sufficiently deep plane of general anesthesia, gauze soaked in a 1:100,000 epinephrine solution was applied to the patient's nasal mucosa and 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was administered via intraoral infiltration. Several minutes after the start of surgery, the patient's blood pressure and heart rate suddenly increased and a wide QRS tachycardia was observed on the electrocardiogram, which then reverted to a normal sinus rhythm. According to the past reports, similar arrhythmias have occurred after administration of epinephrine in the head and neck. These findings suggest that anesthesia providers must be aware of the risks associated with epinephrine and local anesthetic use, particularly in the head and neck region.

Calcium Hydroxyapatite Filler With Integral Lidocaine CaHA (+) for Soft Tissue Augmentation: Results from an Open-Label Multicenter Clinical Study.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue augmentation with calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) is a versatile technique for line filling, skin tightening, lifting, contouring, and volumizing. The present study was designed to confirm safety and effectiveness of the product with lidocaine (CaHA (+)) in a holistic treatment of nasolabial folds (NLFs), marionette lines, and/or cheeks. METHODS: A total of 207 subjects with moderate to severe facial volume deficit were treated with CaHA(+) in this open-label study. Effectiveness assessments included Merz Aesthetics Scales® (MAS), investigator- and subject-assessed Global Aesthetic Improvement Scales (iGAIS/sGAIS), and FACE-QTM questionnaires. Responder rates were defined as at least one-point improvement on MAS according to blinded rating. Safety was assessed through adverse event reporting. RESULTS: Primary endpoint was evaluated 12 weeks after last injection. Responder rates were 93.6%, 88.7%, and 81.9% in the NLFs, marionette lines, and cheeks, respectively, and were statistically significant above the pre-defined 60% threshold (P< 0.0001). Investigator- and subject-assessed GAIS were consistent and showed high rates of improvement throughout the study, with peak values of 98.0% at week 4 on iGAIS and 93.5% at 12 weeks after last injection on sGAIS. After 18 months, the majority of subjects (52.5%) still perceived improvement via sGAIS. Moreover, total FACE-Q scores demonstrated high subject satisfaction with treatment. All related treatment emergent adverse events were transient and expected injection-site reactions mostly of mild to moderate intensity. CONCLUSION: CaHA (+) has demonstrated safety and effectiveness in the treatment of NLFs, marionette lines, and cheek volume loss in real-life conditions up to 18 months. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(5):481-487. doi:10.36849/JDD.6737.

Roller microneedles transdermal delivery of compound lidocaine cream for enhancing the analgesic effect: A randomized self-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to investigate whether the percutaneous delivery of compound lidocaine cream by roller microneedles can shorten the minimal effective onset time of anesthesia, enhance the intensity of anesthesia and prolong the analgesic time, so as to provide a theoretical basis for exploring a comfortable, safe and effective anesthesia method for photoelectric cosmetic surgery. METHODS: A total of 90 healthy volunteers, including 18 male and 72 female, met the criteria and were enrolled in the study from December 2020 to September 2021 in Department of Plastic and Burn Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. This study adopted a two-factor randomized block design of 3 (anesthesia time on the test side: 30, 45, 60 min) × 2 (the test side: the left and right side), and the subjects were divided into group A (n = 30), group B (n = 30), and group C (n = 30). On the test side, the compound lidocaine cream was used for topic anesthesia for 10 min, then the roller microneedle was used to roll on the treatment area, compound lidocaine cream was appropriately supplemented, and the topic anesthesia was kept continued for 20 min (group A), 35 min (group B), and 50 min (group C), respectively. The mirrorsymmetrical area of the test side of the three groups was the control side, and the compound lidocaine cream was used for topic anesthesia for 60 min. Photoelectric therapy was performed after anesthesia was completed. The analgesic effect of the subjects on both sides was comprehensively compared; the scores were obtained using the Kuttner Facial Expression Scale, the Frankl Treatment Compliance Scale, the Houpt Behavior Scale, and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS); the satisfaction with anesthesia was investigated. Before and after treatment the skin temperature, color and adverse reactions of the subjects were recorded. RESULTS: Comparing both sides of the same group, there was no significant difference in terms of the comprehensive evaluation, intraoperative comfort, tolerance, cooperation, pain or satisfaction between the 30-min test side and the routine anesthesia side in group A; the comprehensive evaluation, intraoperative tolerance, cooperation degree, pain degree and satisfaction evaluation of the subjects on the 45-min test side in group B were significantly better than those on the control side; the comprehensive evaluation, intraoperative comfort, tolerance, cooperation, pain and satisfaction of the subjects on the 60-min test side in group C were significantly better than those on the control side. Comparing groups on the control side, there was no significant difference in the comprehensive evaluation, intraoperative comfort, tolerance, cooperation, pain or satisfaction between the three groups of subjects on the control side. Comparing the three groups on the test side, with the prolongation of compound lidocaine cream indwelling time, the subjects' comprehensive evaluation, comfort and pain degree were significantly improved. There was no significant difference in postoperative bruising, swelling, pain, discoloration, redness, or tenderness between the test side and the control side. CONCLUSION: The percutaneous delivery of compound lidocaine cream by roller microneedles can not only shorten the effective time of anesthesia, but also has a good analgesic effect without obvious adverse reactions.

Limited dilute lidocaine anesthesia: A useful technique with many practical applications.

BACKGROUND: Limited dilute lidocaine infiltration facilitates a comfortable procedure and a rapid recovery process following a novel intervention for reduction of cellulite. Infiltration of dilute lidocaine has many other practical applications in dermatologic surgery. OBJECTIVES: This article describes a safe, effective technique for local infiltration of limited volume dilute lidocaine anesthesia in a cellulite reduction procedure. METHODS: The limited dilute lidocaine technique was utilized in studies of a novel device designed to reduce the appearance of cellulite by focal release of fibrous septa in a minimally invasive procedure. No sedation was used. A small (27- to 30-gauge) needle was used to deliver anesthesia to the entry sites. Then, a 20-gauge spinal needle was tunneled under the skin in the superficial plane to manually deliver anesthetic along the advancement pathway of the device and marked cellulite targets. RESULTS: During the initial studies, the mean delivered anesthesia volume was 357.2 ml (range, 250-525 ml) or 18.7 mg/kg (range, 11.1-28.4 mg/kg). The mean anesthesia time was 16 min (range, 8-32 min). The mean number of cellulite depressions treated was 19.8 (range, 11-34). Adverse events were closely monitored, and there were no signs of toxicity in any study patients. There were very low levels of discomfort; all patients reported the procedure was tolerable. This technique facilitates a time-efficient procedure and minimizes weeping of excess fluid during recovery. CONCLUSIONS: When administered with care and skill, the limited dilute anesthesia technique is a safe, effective approach for local anesthesia with many practical applications in dermatologic surgery.

WALANT in hand surgery: Ischemic complications and their medicolegal implications in France: A systematic review of the literature and of French legal databases.

WALANT (Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet) presents a theoretical risk of digital ischemia due to the presence of epinephrine, associated to the local anesthetic. For this reason, in France, the market authorization prohibits the use of epinephrine in digital extremities. The main objective of the present study was to assess the risk of ischemic complications reported in literature, and then to analyze the medicolegal implications in France. A systematic literature review was performed by three independent readers, using the PubMed and Embase databases. Also, declarations of claims and legal proceedings between 2007 and 2020 in France were examined in the official national Légifrance and Doctrine databases. Eight of the 424 articles retrieved were selected. Only 3 cases of digital necrosis following local anesthesia with adrenalized lidocaine were reported. Adrenalized xylocaine may be considered in case of peripheral microcirculation disorder. From a medicolegal point of view, no complaints or medicolegal implications were associated with WALANT in France. It seems that the market authorization for adrenalized local anesthesia could be extended to use in the digital extremities. However, the lack of medical and legal data calls for caution. We therefore recommend the use of an institutional protocol specifying the cases of overdose and the patient's pathway, and training for practitioners wishing to use this technique.

HEMODYNAMIC FUNCTION IN COMPARISON OF TWO TYPES OF LOCAL ANESTHESIA WITH VASOCONSTRICTOR IN DAY SURGERY: RETROSPECTIVE STUDY.

Introduction: Hemodynamic changes and cardiac arrhythmias are not uncommon in clinical practice, depending on including patient features, surgical treatment and drugs administered. We describe hemodynamic changes developed in young patients, soon after a local infiltration anesthesia in day surgery. Methods: We retrospectively assessed the hemodynamic effect of 2% lidocaine with 0,0125mg/ml adrenaline (Li & AD) administered for septorhinoplasty in 44 participants and combination of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine with 0.0125mg/ml adrenaline (BLi & AD) for breast augmentation in 48 participants. Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded before the introduction of general anesthesia, immediately 5.10 and 20 minutes after administration of local infiltration, anesthetic (LIA) and data were analyzed. Results: The mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) in all observed measurements before general anesthesia (0), immediately, 5 minutes, 10 minutes and 20 minutes after local infiltration anesthesia was higher among patients who underwent septorinoplasty (Li & AD), in relation to patients who underwent breast augmentation (BLi & AD) (p <05). The level of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in measurement 20 minutes compared to measurement in 10 minutes was increased by 9,52 mmHg. The septorhinoplasty group showed a significant increase in heart rate measured 20 minutes after local infiltration anesthesia with adrenaline. Conclusions: Measured transitory changes in heart rate and blood pressure after local infiltration of vasoconstrictor anesthetics in healthy patients prior to septorinoplasty and breast augmentation may be induced by endogenous and / or exogenous epinephrine. Bupivacaine solution for local infiltration analgesia reduces hemodynamic disturbances and prolongs analgesic effect. We highlight the need for careful preoperative evaluation, including anxiety assessment and treatment in all patients in day surgery.

Accelerated Idioventricular Rhythm Following Intraoral Local Anesthetic Injection During General Anesthesia.

Some anesthetic agents or adjunct medications administered during general anesthesia can cause an accelerated idioventricular rhythm (AIVR), which is associated with higher vagal tone and lower sympathetic activity. We encountered AIVR induced by vagal response to injection-related pain following local anesthetic infiltration into the oral mucosa during general anesthesia. A 48-year-old woman underwent extraction of a residual tooth root from the left maxillary sinus under general anesthesia. Routine preoperative electrocardiogram (ECG) was otherwise normal. Eight milliliters of 1% lidocaine (80 mg) with 1:100,000 epinephrine (80 µg) was infiltrated around the left maxillary molars over 20 seconds using a 23-gauge needle and firm pressure. Widened QRS complexes consistent with AIVR were observed for ∼60 seconds, followed by an atrioventricular junctional rhythm and the return of normal sinus rhythm. A cardiology consultation and 12-lead ECG in the operating room produced no additional concerns, so the operation continued with no complications. AIVR was presumably caused by activation of the trigeminocardiac reflex triggered by intense pain following rapid local anesthetic infiltration with a large gauge needle and firm pressure. Administration of local anesthetic should be performed cautiously when using a large gauge needle and avoid excessive pressure.

Lidocaine: A Local Anesthetic, Its Adverse Effects and Management.

The most widely used medications in dentistry are local anesthetics (LA), especially lidocaine, and the number of recorded adverse allergic responses, particularly of hazardous responses, is quite low. However, allergic reactions can range from moderate to life-threatening, requiring rapid diagnosis and treatment. This article serves as a review to provide information on LA, their adverse reactions, causes, and management.

High Volume Liposuction in Tumescence Anesthesia in Lipedema Patients: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic, progressive disease that occurs almost exclusively in women and leads to pathological, painful fat growths at the extremities. Only symptomatic therapy can be offered since the etiology of the disease has not yet been clarified. Liposuction in tumescent anesthesia has established itself as a surgical treatment method of choice. The complication rate associated with the procedure and the pharmacological course and safety of treatment in patients with lipedema has not yet been sufficiently studied. The aim of the study was to broaden the evidence on the safety of ambulatory high-volume liposuction in tumescent anesthesia in lipedema patients. Influencing factors of patients (weight, fat content, comorbidities) or the process technique (drug administration, volume of aspirates) should be investigated on the safety and risks of tumescent anesthesia. This was a retrospective data analysis in which data from 27 patients (40 liposuction procedures) treated at the Sandhofer and Barsch lipedema center between 2016 and 2018 were evaluated. The liposuctions were carried out in tumescent anesthesia and using a Power-Assisted Liposuction system. Clinical examinations and regular blood samples were carried out before the procedure, intra- and postoperatively. The procedures lasted an average of 118 minutes and an average of 6111 ml of aspirate was removed. For tumescent anesthesia, patients were given an average lidocaine dose of 34.23 mg/kg body weight and an epinephrine dose of 0.11 mg/kg body weight. No relevant complications associated with drug side effects, hypovolemia or hypervolemia or blood loss were detected. Liposuction under high volume tumescent anesthesia for the treatment of lipedema patients is, even for major intervention, a safe procedure. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(3):326-334. doi:10.36849/JDD.5828.

Risk of adverse events due to high volumes of local anesthesia during Mohs micrographic surgery.

General guidelines for the maximum amounts of locally injected lidocaine exist; however, there is a paucity of data in the Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) literature. This study aimed to determine the safety and adverse effects seen in patients that receive larger amounts of locally injected lidocaine. A retrospective chart review of 563 patients from 1992 to 2016 who received over 30 mL of locally injected lidocaine was conducted. Patient records were reviewed within seven postoperative days for complications. The average amount of anesthesia received was 40 mL, and the average patient weight was 86.69 kg. 1.4% of patients had a complication on the day of surgery, and 4.4% of patients had a complication within 7 days of the surgery. The most common complications were excessive bleeding/hematoma formation and wound infection. Only two complications could be attributable to local anesthetics. Gender, heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking were not significant risk factors for the development of complications. MMS is a safe outpatient procedure for patients that require over 30 mL of locally injected anesthesia. The safety of high volumes of lidocaine extends to patients with risk factors such as heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking.

Local Anesthesia Thoracoscopy with versus without Midazolam: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Medical thoracoscopy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of pleural diseases. To date, no consensus exists regarding the choice of sedative and analgesic agents in patients undergoing local anesthetic thoracoscopy (LAT), and questions are raised as to whether sedatives may add to respiratory side effects. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that administration of midazolam associated with lidocaine versus lidocaine alone in patients with LAT adds to respiratory side effects. METHODS: We randomly assigned 80 patients to a 1:1 study to 2 groups: local anesthesia by lidocaine (n = 40) versus lidocaine and midazolam (n = 40), with the primary end point being the mean lowest oxygen saturation. The secondary end points were cardiovascular parameters, complications, days of drainage, hospital stay, and patients' quality of life (QoL) as assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: The mean age of all patients was 66.6 ± 13.1 years. The study comprised 50 males (62.5%). No difference was observed in the demographics between the 2 groups. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in oxygen saturation (primary end point). A significant difference was observed in favor of the midazolam group regarding the QoL assessed by VAS. CONCLUSION: Midazolam does not add to respiratory side effects when it is used with lidocaine for LAT, while patients' QoL is actually improved in this group. Therefore, in our department, we changed our startegy in favor of the association of lidocaine and midazolam.