Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Anticancer Res ; 41(7): 3233-3246, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34230117

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: Upper limb breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a chronic and severe condition affecting a significant percentage of breast cancer survivors. Even though its physiopathology is well-known, there is no worldwide consensus on BCRL evaluation and a gold-standard treatment. This narrative review aims at providing a brief descriptive overview with regard to BCRL treatment modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a literature search within the PubMed database, and 33 articles out of 56 were selected, including reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses aiming find the most updated evidence regarding BCRL treatment modalities. RESULTS: Physical exercise (aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, aquatic therapy), bandages, and intermittent pneumatic compression were shown to be most effective in BCRL patients, in terms of swelling reduction in the acute-intensive phase. Furthermore, physical exercise was beneficial also as a maintenance tool. Manual lymphatic drainage demonstrated efficacy in preventing secondary lymphedema if applied immediately after breast cancer surgery or in early phases of BCRL or as a maintenance tool. Complementary procedures such as acupuncture, reflexology, yoga and photo-biomodulation therapy did not show conclusive results in BCRL treatment. Surgery was shown effective in managing symptoms (liposuction), preventing (lymphaticovenular anastomosis) and treating BCRL (vascularized lymph node transfer). CONCLUSION: BCRL is still a challenging condition either for breast cancer survivors and clinicians, deeply impacting patient functioning and quality of life. Due to the lack of globally accepted criteria in evaluating BCRL, to date a gold standard treatment for this widespread issue is still needed.


Asunto(s)
Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/fisiopatología , Neoplasias de la Mama/fisiopatología , Terapias Complementarias/métodos , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Sobrevivientes
2.
Integr Cancer Ther ; 19: 1534735420903801, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32108545

RESUMEN

Background: The purpose of this study is to determine the interrater reliability of dynamic muscle tests in the early rehabilitation phase in women after breast cancer surgery with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) based on the "preventive intervention against lymphedema after breast cancer" (LYCA) randomised controlled trial. Methods: Fifteen women treated with breast cancer surgery including ALND were recruited from participants in the LYCA trial. In this interrater reliability study, women were tested in 4 dynamic muscle tests by 2 physiotherapists at a Capital Hospital in Denmark. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was used to assess the relative reliability between raters. A Bland-Altman plot and limits of agreement were calculated to describe the absolute reliability. Results: All 6 subtests displayed high interrater reliability. ICC values were: leg press 0.96 (95% CI = 0.87-0.99), elbow flexion (contralateral) 0.94 (0.83-0.98), elbow flexion (affected arm) 0.93 (0.80-0.98), elbow extension 0.80 (0.41-0.93), shoulder abduction (contralateral) 0.89 (0.68-0.96), and shoulder abduction (affected arm) 0.91 (0.74-0.97). Cumulated interrater reliability for the test battery was very high (ICC = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.990-1.0). The absolute reliability of this study was considered high, and the absence of large shifts between mean and the line of 0 difference suggest no systematic bias that could influence clinical interpretation. Conclusions: The dynamic muscle tests evaluated in this study had high interrater reliability and can be used reliably in women in the postoperative phase after breast cancer surgery with ALND.


Asunto(s)
Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Ganglios Linfáticos , Mastectomía , Dinamómetro de Fuerza Muscular , Adulto , Axila , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/fisiopatología , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/rehabilitación , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Mastectomía/métodos , Mastectomía/rehabilitación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Músculo Esquelético/fisiopatología , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
3.
Complement Ther Clin Pract ; 36: 49-55, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31383443

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To synthesize recent empirical evidence on yoga-based interventions for patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. METHODS: We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE databases for studies published between October 2007 and September 2018 in any language. Risk of bias and methodological quality were evaluated using the PRISMA statement and checklist and the Cochrane Collaboration tool. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in lymphedema status, range of shoulder motion and spinal mobility after an 8-week yoga intervention, whereas there was no consistency in quality of life following yoga intervention. Additionally, there was no difference in lymphedema status, extracellular fluid and tissue resistance outcomes in the affected arm following a long-term yoga practice. CONCLUSION: The current findings could not be clearly demonstrated that yoga programme intervention as an addition to usual care is superior to along usual care, and keep yoga exercise does not provide significant added benefits.


Asunto(s)
Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/terapia , Yoga , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Hombro/fisiopatología
4.
Trials ; 20(1): 403, 2019 Jul 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31277678

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lymphedema is the most common complication after breast cancer treatment, but management of lymphedema remains a clinical challenge. Several studies have reported the beneficial effect of acupuncture for treating breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Our objective is to verify the effectiveness of warm acupuncture on BCRL and compare the effectiveness of a local distribution acupoint combination with a local-distal acupoint combination for BCRL. METHODS: This is a study protocol for a multicenter, three-arm parallel, assessor blinded, randomized controlled trial. A total of 108 participants diagnosed as BCRL will be randomly allocated in equal proportions to a local distribution acupoint (LA) group, a local-distal acupoint (LDA) group, or a waiting-list (WL) group. The LA and LDA groups will receive 20 acupuncture treatment over 8 weeks with local distribution acupoint combination and local-distal acupoint combination, respectively. The WL group will receive acupuncture treatment after the study is concluded. The primary outcome is the mean change in inter-limb circumference difference from baseline to week 8. The secondary outcomes include volume measurement, skin hardness, common terminology criteria for adverse events 4.03 (edema limbs criteria), stages of lymphedema from the International Society of Lymphology, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, and the Medical Outcome Study 36-item Short-form Health Survey. DISCUSSION: This study aims to provide data on warm acupuncture as an effective treatment for BCRL and at the same time compare the effectiveness of different acupoint combinations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: Identifier NCT03373474 . Registered on 14th December 2017.


Asunto(s)
Puntos de Acupuntura , Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/terapia , Calor , Terapia por Acupuntura/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/diagnóstico , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/fisiopatología , China , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
5.
Annu Rev Med ; 69: 263-276, 2018 01 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28877002

RESUMEN

Lymphedema affects up to 1 in 6 patients who undergo treatment for a solid tumor in the United States. Its prevalence has increased as more effective oncologic therapies have improved patient survival, but there remains no definitive cure. Recent research has elucidated new details in the pathogenesis of the disease and has demonstrated that it is fundamentally an immunologic process that ultimately results in inflammation, fibroadipose deposition, impaired lymphangiogenesis, and dysfunctional lymphatic pumping. These findings have allowed for the development of novel medical and surgical therapies that may potentially alter the standard of care for a disease that has largely been treated by compression. This review seeks to provide an overview of the emerging therapies and how they can be utilized for effective management of lymphedema.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio , Ganglios Linfáticos/trasplante , Linfedema/terapia , Drenaje Linfático Manual , Trasplante de Células Madre , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Programas de Reducción de Peso , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/fisiopatología , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/terapia , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Terapia Genética , Humanos , Aparatos de Compresión Neumática Intermitente , Lipectomía , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad , Vasos Linfáticos/cirugía , Linfedema/fisiopatología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Medias de Compresión , Factor C de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/genética , Factor C de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Venas/cirugía
6.
Lymphat Res Biol ; 15(1): 45-56, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28323572

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL) arises from a mechanical insufficiency following cancer therapies. Early BCRL detection and personalized intervention require an improved understanding of the physiological processes that initiate lymphatic impairment. Here, internal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of the tissue microenvironment were paired with clinical measures of tissue structure to test fundamental hypotheses regarding structural tissue and muscle changes after the commonly used therapeutic intervention of manual lymphatic drainage (MLD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Measurements to identify lymphatic dysfunction in healthy volunteers (n = 29) and patients with BCRL (n = 16) consisted of (1) limb volume, tissue dielectric constant, and bioelectrical impedance (i.e., non-MRI measures); (2) qualitative 3 Tesla diffusion-weighted, T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI; and (3) quantitative multi-echo T2 MRI of the axilla. Measurements were repeated in patients immediately following MLD. Normative control and BCRL T2 values were quantified and a signed Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test was applied (significance: two-sided p < 0.05). Non-MRI measures yielded significant capacity for discriminating between arms with versus without clinical signs of BCRL, yet yielded no change in response to MLD. Alternatively, a significant increase in deep tissue T2 on the involved (pre T2 = 0.0371 ± 0.003 seconds; post T2 = 0.0389 ± 0.003; p = 0.029) and contralateral (pre T2 = 0.0365 ± 0.002; post T2 = 0.0395 ± 0.002; p < 0.01) arms was observed. Trends for larger T2 increases on the involved side after MLD in patients with stage 2 BCRL relative to earlier stages 0 and 1 BCRL were observed, consistent with tissue composition changes in later stages of BCRL manifesting as breakdown of fibrotic tissue after MLD in the involved arm. Contrast consistent with relocation of fluid to the contralateral quadrant was observed in all stages. CONCLUSION: Quantitative deep tissue T2 MRI values yielded significant changes following MLD treatment, whereas non-MRI measurements did not vary. These findings highlight that internal imaging measures of tissue composition may be useful for evaluating how current and emerging therapies impact tissue function.


Asunto(s)
Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/fisiopatología , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/terapia , Vasos Linfáticos/fisiopatología , Masaje/métodos , Adulto , Axila , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/diagnóstico , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/efectos adversos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
BMC Complement Altern Med ; 16: 343, 2016 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27590865

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the effect of an 8-week yoga intervention on the shoulder and spinal actions of women with breast cancer-related arm lymphoedema. METHOD: A randomised controlled pilot trial. The intervention group (n = 12) completed eight weeks of daily yoga sessions while the control group (n = 11) continued with best current care including information on compression sleeves, skin care, risks of temperature variations and recommended safe use of affected arm. Lumbo-pelvic posture, range of motion (ROM) in the shoulder and spine, and strength in shoulder and pectoral major and minor, and serratus anterior were taken at baseline, week 8 and after a 4-week follow-up. Outcome assessors were blinded to allocation. RESULTS: At week eight the intervention group had an improvement in lumbo-pelvic posture, as indicated by a reduction in pelvic obliquity compared to the control group (mean difference = -8.39°, 95 % CI: -15.64 to -1.13°, p = 0.023). A secondary finding was that strength in shoulder abduction significantly increased following the yoga intervention in both the affected (9.5 kg; CI: 0.34 to 18.66, p = 0.042) and non-affected arm (11.58 kg; CI: 0.25 to 22.91; p = 0.045). There were no significant between group changes in any ROM measures as a result of the yoga intervention. CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrates that participation in yoga may provide benefits for posture and strength in women with Breast Cancer Related Lymphoedema. The improvements may be attributed to the focus of yoga on overall postural and functional movement patterns. Further trials with longer intervention that follow this methodology are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12611000202965 .


Asunto(s)
Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/fisiopatología , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/terapia , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Hombro/fisiopatología , Yoga , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Femenino , Fuerza de la Mano/fisiología , Humanos , Fuerza Muscular/fisiología , Proyectos Piloto , Postura/fisiología , Columna Vertebral/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Integr Cancer Ther ; 15(3): 308-17, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26582633

RESUMEN

Background Resistance exercise is emerging as a potential adjunct therapy to aid in the management of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). However, the mechanisms underlying the relationships between the acute and long-term benefits of resistance exercise on BCRL are not well understood. Purpose To examine the acute inflammatory response to upper-body resistance exercise in women with BCRL and to compare these effects between resistance exercises involving low, moderate, and high loads. The impact on lymphedema status and associated symptoms was also compared. Methods A total of 21 women, 62 ± 10 years old, with BCRL participated in the study. Participants completed low-load (15-20 repetition maximum [RM]), moderate-load (10-12 RM), and high-load (6-8 RM) exercise sessions consisting of 3 sets of 6 upper-body resistance exercises. Sessions were completed in a randomized order separated by a 7- to 10-day wash-out period. Venous blood samples were obtained to assess markers of exercise-induced muscle damage and inflammation. Lymphedema status was assessed using bioimpedance spectroscopy and arm circumferences, and associated symptoms were assessed using Visual Analogue Scales for pain, heaviness, and tightness. Measurements were conducted before and 24 hours after the exercise sessions. Results No significant changes in creatine kinase, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α were observed following the 3 resistance exercise sessions. There were no significant changes in arm swelling or symptom severity scores across the 3 resistance exercise conditions. Conclusions The magnitude of acute exercise-induced inflammation following upper-body resistance exercise in women with BCRL does not vary between resistance exercise loads.


Asunto(s)
Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/etiología , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/fisiopatología , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Inflamación/fisiopatología , Inflamación/terapia , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Creatina Quinasa/metabolismo , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación/metabolismo , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Entrenamiento de Fuerza/métodos , Sobrevivientes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA