Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 105
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(5): 2477-2487, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38291243

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the combined maximal medical treatment for adenoid hypertrophy in preschool children. METHODS: Sixty-four children underwent one-year combined therapy with intranasal mometasone furoate, oral desloratadine, nasal saline irrigation, and bacteriotherapy. Additionally, decongestion drops were applied during scheduled breaks. RESULTS: Of the 64 treated children, 72% showed clinical improvement in adenoid symptoms while 28% did not improve and underwent surgery. These groups differed significantly in terms of the overall reduction in ailments after treatment (p < 0.001), infection rate (p < 0.001), catarrh severity (p < 0.001) and nasal patency (p < 0.001). Endoscopic examination confirmed that responders experienced, on average, a decrease of 8.4% in the adenoid/choana ratio and an improvement in mucosal coverage of the adenoid. These effects were not observed in the group of children whose parents opted for surgery after nine months of conservative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed new schema of long-term maximal medical treatment with the use of combined intermittent treatment of intranasal mometasone furoate and decongestion drops, oral desloratadine, nasal saline irrigation, and bacteriotherapy can be attempted in patients with adenoid hypertrophy symptoms, and responders may avoid the need for surgery. The applied treatment breaks resulted in a low number of therapeutic side effects.


Asunto(s)
Tonsila Faríngea , Loratadina/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Preescolar , Estudios Prospectivos , Furoato de Mometasona/uso terapéutico , Hipertrofia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenoidectomía
2.
In Vivo ; 37(3): 1156-1163, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37103074

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: Liver cancer is one of the malignancies with the highest mortality-to-incidence ratio worldwide. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. Combination therapy and drug repurposing can improve the response of the patients to therapy in several cancers. The aim of the present study was to merge these two strategies and evaluate whether the two-drug- or three-drug- combination of sorafenib, raloxifene, and loratadine improves the antineoplastic effect on human liver cancer cells in comparison to the single-drug effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The human liver cancer cell lines HepG2 and HuH7 were studied. The effect of sorafenib, raloxifene, and loratadine on the metabolic activity was determined using the MTT assay. The inhibitory concentrations (IC20 and IC50) were calculated from these results and used in the drug-combination experiments. Apoptosis and cell survival were studied by flow cytometry and using the colony formation assay, respectively. RESULTS: In both cell lines, sorafenib, raloxifene, and loratadine in two-drug and three-drug combinations significantly reduced metabolic activity and significantly increased the percentage of apoptotic cells compared to the single-drug effect. In addition, all the combinations significantly reduced the colony-forming capacity in the HepG2 cell line. Surprisingly, the effect of raloxifene on apoptosis was similar to that observed using the combinations. CONCLUSION: The triple combination sorafenib-raloxifene-loratadine may be a novel promising approach in the treatment of liver cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Sorafenib/farmacología , Loratadina/farmacología , Loratadina/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Raloxifeno/farmacología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Proliferación Celular , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Apoptosis , Línea Celular Tumoral
3.
Eur J Med Res ; 27(1): 58, 2022 Apr 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35462555

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In this study, we attempted to assess the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for allergic rhinitis (AR), and to test the robustness of the estimated effects. METHODS: The Cochrane methodology standard was followed to conduct this systematic review. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing acupuncture with other therapies for AR were included. Furthermore, trial sequential analysis was conducted to test the robustness of pooled results. Thirty trials with 4413 participants were included. RESULTS: Acupuncture improved the nasal symptoms on Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) and quality of life measured by Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) in adults with AR, compared to acupuncture with no intervention. Acupuncture was also shown to be more effective than sham acupuncture for nasal symptom (RQLQ subscale, n = 489, MD - 0.60, 95% CI - 1.16 to - 0.04) and quality of life (RQLQ, n = 248, - 8.47 95% CI - 14.91, - 2.03). No clear difference was observed between acupuncture and cetirizine or loratadine. Interestingly, trial sequential analysis (TSA) failed to confirm the aforementioned results. The effect of acupuncture for children/adolescents with AR remains unclear due to insufficient data. The performance bias and attrition bias are serious in most studies that were included. Selection bias may also have affected the quality of the evidence. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture may have an advantage over no intervention and sham acupuncture in improving nasal symptoms and quality of life for adults with AR. The effect of acupuncture and cetirizine or loratadine for AR may be similar. Additional trials are necessary to confirm these results.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura , Rinitis Alérgica , Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Cetirizina , Niño , Humanos , Loratadina , Calidad de Vida , Rinitis Alérgica/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Cells ; 10(5)2021 05 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34068720

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pharmacological targeting aberrant activation of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase signaling is an established approach to treating lung adenocarcinoma. Osimertinib is a tyrosine kinase approved and effective in treating lung adenocarcinomas that have one of several common activating mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor. The emergence of resistance to osimertinib after a year or two is the rule. We developed a five-drug adjuvant regimen designed to increase osimertinib's growth inhibition and thereby delay the development of resistance. Areas of Uncertainty: Although the assembled preclinical data is strong, preclinical data and the following clinical trial results can be discrepant. The safety of OPALS drugs when used individually is excellent. We have no data from humans on their tolerability when used as an ensemble. That there is no data from the individual drugs to suspect problematic interaction does not exclude the possibility. DATA SOURCES: All relevant PubMed.org articles on the OPALS drugs and corresponding pathophysiology of lung adenocarcinoma and glioblastoma were reviewed. Therapeutic Opinion: The five drugs of OPALS are in wide use in general medicine for non-oncology indications. OPALS uses the anti-protozoal drug pyrimethamine, the antihistamine cyproheptadine, the antibiotic azithromycin, the antihistamine loratadine, and the potassium sparing diuretic spironolactone. We show how these inexpensive and generically available drugs intersect with and inhibit lung adenocarcinoma growth drive. We also review data showing that both OPALS adjuvant drugs and osimertinib have data showing they may be active in suppressing glioblastoma growth.


Asunto(s)
Acrilamidas/administración & dosificación , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos de Anilina/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Reposicionamiento de Medicamentos , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Azitromicina/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Línea Celular Tumoral , Ciproheptadina/administración & dosificación , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Humanos , Loratadina/administración & dosificación , Ratones , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimetamina/administración & dosificación , Espironolactona/administración & dosificación
5.
Drug Deliv ; 28(1): 229-239, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33501873

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The work aimed to develop a co-loaded loratadine and sulpiride nasal nanoemulsion for allergic rhinitis management. METHODS: Compatibility studies were conducted adopting differential scanning calorimetry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Nanoemulsion formulations were prepared using soybean lecithin, olive oil and tween 80. Sodium cholate and glycerol were employed as co-surfactants. Nanoemulsions were assessed for viscosity, pH, droplet size, polydispersity index, zeta potential, electrical conductivity, entrapment, In vitro drug release and corresponding kinetics. Stability of the selected formulation was investigated. The biological effectiveness was evaluated in rabbit models of ovalbumin-induced allergic rhinitis by measuring TNF-α, TGF-ß and IL-1. RESULTS: Compatibility studies revealed absence of drug/drug interactions. Nanoemulsions exhibited > 90% entrapment efficiency. The selected nanoemulsion demonstrated small droplet size (85.2 ± 0.2 nm), low PDI (0.35 ± 0.0) and appropriate Zeta Potential (-23.3 ± 0.2) and stability. It also displayed enhanced in vitro drug release following the Higuashi Diffusion and Baker-Lonsdale models. The mean relative mRNA expression of TNF-α, IL-1 and TGF-ß significantly decreased from 9.59 ± 1.06, 4.15 ± 0.02 and 4.15 ± 0.02 to 1.28 ± 0.02, 1.93 ± 0.06 and 1.56 ± 0.02 respectively after treatment with the selected nanoemulsion formulation. CONCLUSION: The results reflected a promising potent effect of the combined loratadine and sulpiride nasal nanoemulsion in managing the symptoms of allergic rhinitis.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Dopamina/administración & dosificación , Emulsiones , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H1 no Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Loratadina/administración & dosificación , Mucosa Nasal/efectos de los fármacos , Rinitis Alérgica/metabolismo , Sulpirida/administración & dosificación , Tensoactivos , Administración Intranasal , Animales , Rastreo Diferencial de Calorimetría , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Antagonistas de Dopamina/farmacología , Combinación de Medicamentos , Liberación de Fármacos , Glicerol , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H1 no Sedantes/farmacología , Técnicas In Vitro , Interleucina-1/metabolismo , Lecitinas , Loratadina/farmacología , Nanoestructuras , Mucosa Nasal/metabolismo , Aceite de Oliva , Ovalbúmina , Senos Paranasales/efectos de los fármacos , Senos Paranasales/metabolismo , Polisorbatos , Conejos , Rinitis Alérgica/inducido químicamente , Colato de Sodio , Glycine max , Espectroscopía Infrarroja por Transformada de Fourier , Sulpirida/farmacología , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta/efectos de los fármacos , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta/metabolismo , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/efectos de los fármacos , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/metabolismo
6.
Iran J Immunol ; 17(4): 283-291, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33382385

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D supplementation has been proven to be effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). OBJECTIVE: We conducted the present study to explore the role and efficacy of vitamin D adjuvant therapy for the treatment of inflammation in patients with AR. METHODS: Out of 127 patients with potential eligible AR, 60 were randomly assigned into two groups and were finally included in our analysis (n=30 for each intervention). The patients with potential eligible AR were randomly allocated to intervention with desloratadine citrate disodium (DCD, 8.8 mg/day) without and with vitamin D3 nasal drops (1.5х106 IU, once/week) for four weeks. Thirty healthy control subjects were included in our study. We assessed the changes in the serum 25(OH)D, peripheral blood eosinophils, interleukin (IL)-4 levels, and nasal symptoms. Serum 25(OH)D, peripheral blood eosinophils, and IL-4 levels were detected respectively with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), a blood detector, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Our patients who received vitamin D3 adjuvant therapy had a higher serum 25(OH)D level (47.57 ± 2.83 vs. 31.51 ± 2.95 ng/ml, p=0.000) and lower AR symptoms score (2.07 ± 1.89 vs. 3.37 ± 1.50, p=0.005), serum IL-4 (10.38 ± 3.41 vs. 12.79 ± 5.40 pg/ml, p=0.043), and peripheral blood eosinophils (0.34 ± 0.09 vs. 0.41 ± 0.10 109/l, p=0.003) compared with DCD single treatment. The efficacy rates of DCD with and without vitamin D3 in AR were 97% and 84%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Nasal vitamin D3 combined with DCD could improve the clinical symptoms of AR. Vitamin D3 adjunct therapy showed significant effects on inhibiting inflammation in patients with AR. We concluded that vitamin D3 supplementation could be an effective adjuvant therapy in AR patients.


Asunto(s)
Colecalciferol/uso terapéutico , Eosinófilos/inmunología , Loratadina/análogos & derivados , Rinitis Alérgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Adyuvantes Farmacéuticos , Adolescente , Adulto , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Interleucina-4/sangre , Loratadina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obstrucción Nasal , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
7.
Drug Metab Dispos ; 48(10): 934-943, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32665417

RESUMEN

The PXB-mouse is potentially a useful in vivo model to predict human hepatic metabolism and clearance. Four model compounds, [14C]desloratadine, [3H]mianserin, cyproheptadine, and [3H]carbazeran, all reported with disproportionate human metabolites, were orally administered to PXB- or control SCID mice to elucidate the biotransformation of each of them. For [14C]desloratadine in PXB-mice, O-glucuronide of 3-hydroxydesloratadine was observed as the predominant metabolite in both the plasma and urine. Both 3-hydroxydesloratadine and its O-glucuronide were detected as major drug-related materials in the bile, whereas only 3-hydroxydesloratadine was detected in the feces, suggesting that a fraction of 3-hydroxydesloratadine in feces was derived from deconjugation of its O-glucuronide by gut microflora. This information can help understand the biliary clearance mechanism of a drug and may fill the gap in a human absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion study, in which the bile samples are typically not available. The metabolic profiles in PXB-mice were qualitatively similar to those reported in humans in a clinical study in which 3-hydroxydesloratadine and its O-glucuronide were major and disproportionate metabolites compared with rat, mouse, and monkey. In the control SCID mice, neither of the metabolites was detected in any matrix. Similarly, for the other three compounds, all human specific or disproportionate metabolites were detected at a high level in PXB-mice, but they were either minimally observed or not observed in the control mice. Data from these four compounds indicate that studies in PXB-mice can help predict the potential for the presence of human disproportionate metabolites (relative to preclinical species) prior to conducting clinical studies and understand the biliary clearance mechanism of a drug. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Studies in PXB-mice have successfully predicted the human major and disproportionate metabolites compared with preclinical safety species for desloratadine, mianserin, cyproheptadine, and carbazeran. In addition, biliary excretion data from PXB-mice can help illustrate the human biliary clearance mechanism of a drug.


Asunto(s)
Eliminación Hepatobiliar , Hígado/metabolismo , Animales , Bilis/metabolismo , Biotransformación , Carbamatos/administración & dosificación , Carbamatos/farmacocinética , Ciproheptadina/administración & dosificación , Ciproheptadina/farmacocinética , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Hepatocitos/metabolismo , Hepatocitos/trasplante , Humanos , Hígado/citología , Loratadina/administración & dosificación , Loratadina/análogos & derivados , Loratadina/farmacocinética , Masculino , Mianserina/administración & dosificación , Mianserina/farmacocinética , Ratones , Quimera por Trasplante/metabolismo
8.
BMC Complement Med Ther ; 20(1): 119, 2020 Apr 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32312261

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a non-infectious immune disease and incidents of the disease has continuously increased in Thailand. Ginger, a Thai herb, is used in food and Thai traditional medicine. This study was designed to assess efficacy and safety of ginger extract in comparison with loratadine for AR treatment. METHODS: AR patients were treated with ginger extract 500 mg (n = 40) against those treated with loratadine 10 mg (n = 40) in a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial for 3 and 6 weeks. The efficacy was evaluated from clinical examinations i.e. total nasal symptom scores (TNSS), cross-sectional area of the nasal cavity with acoustic rhinometry (ARM) and rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ). The safety of treatment was measured by blood pressure, blood analysis and history-taking for side effects. RESULTS: The results showed both ginger extract and loratadine treated groups significantly decreased TNSS scores but there was no significant difference between the two groups. In acoustic rhinometry measurement, the ginger treated group significantly gradually increased the estimated volume of the nasal cavity and decreased distances from the nostril, but the loratadine treated group did not cause a change. Both groups gave significantly improvement in every aspect of the RQLQ at third weeks. The treatment with ginger extract was as safe as loratadine as shown by renal and liver function results obtained from blood analysis. Both treatments had no effect on blood pressure of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The ginger extract is as good as loratadine in improving nasal symptoms and quality of life in AR patients. However, ginger extract caused less side effects especially, drowsiness, fatigue, dizziness and constipation. Therefore, the ginger extract could be used as alternative treatment for patients with AR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration number: NCT02576808) on 15 October 2015.


Asunto(s)
Loratadina/uso terapéutico , Extractos Vegetales/uso terapéutico , Rinitis Alérgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Zingiber officinale , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H1 no Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tailandia , Adulto Joven
9.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 13: 3357-3367, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31576110

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Histamine H1 receptor antagonists are widely used in the treatment of allergic diseases. H1 receptors are expressed on bone cells and histamine takes part in regulation of bone metabolism. Loratadine is often prescribed to children. PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of loratadine on the skeletal system of young rats. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Loratadine (0.5, 5, and 50 mg/kg p.o. daily) was administered for 4 weeks to male Wistar rats, 6-week-old at the start of the experiment. Bone mass, mass of bone mineral, calcium, and phosphorus content in the bone mineral of the tibia, femur, and L-4 vertebra, histomorphometric parameters of the femur, mechanical properties of the proximal tibial metaphysis, femoral diaphysis and femoral neck, and serum levels of bone turnover markers were examined. RESULTS: Loratadine at 0.5 and 5 mg/kg did not significantly affect the skeletal system of young rats. At 50 mg/kg, loratadine decreased the femoral length, increased content of calcium and phosphorus in the bone mineral of the vertebra, and tended to improve mechanical properties of the tibial metaphysis. CONCLUSION: High-dose loratadine slightly but significantly affected development of the skeletal system in rapidly growing rats.


Asunto(s)
Huesos/efectos de los fármacos , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H1/farmacología , Loratadina/farmacología , Sistema Musculoesquelético/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Huesos/metabolismo , Masculino , Sistema Musculoesquelético/metabolismo , Ratas , Ratas Wistar
10.
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi ; 44(16): 3551-3557, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31602921

RESUMEN

To analyze the efficacy and safety of Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets combined with desloratadine as well as desloratadine alone in the treatment of chronic urticaria by Meta-analysis,in order to provide evidence-based reference for clinical treatment.PubMed,CBM,Wan Fang,VIP database and CNKI database were retrieved to collect randomized controlled trials( RCT) about Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets combined with desloratadine( test group) as well as desloratadine alone( control group) in the treatment of chronic urticaria. Meta-analysis was performed by using Rev Man 5. 3 software after data extraction and quality evaluation( a total of 15 RCTs were included,involving 1 411 patients). Meta-analysis showed that the total effective rate( RR = 1. 28,95%CI[1. 22,1. 35],P<0. 000 01) and the quality of life improvement rate( RR = 1. 49,95% CI[1. 33,1. 66],P< 0. 000 01) of the test group were better than those of the control group,and the recurrence rate( RR = 0. 29,95%CI[0. 21,0. 40],P<0. 000 01) was significantly lower than that of the control group,with statistically significant differences; there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions( RR = 1. 02,95%CI[0. 68,1. 53],P = 0. 92) compared with the control group. Based on the included RCTs,the efficacy of Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets combined with desloratadine in the treatment of chronic urticaria were superior to those of desloratadine alone,with similarity in safety. However,due to the low quality of RCTs and the lack of large-scale multi-center studies,the results shall not be further verified by clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/uso terapéutico , Glicósidos/uso terapéutico , Loratadina/análogos & derivados , Tripterygium/química , Urticaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Loratadina/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Comprimidos
11.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 180(4): 274-283, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31618733

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: No comparative study of antihistamines that differ in structural system has been conducted in allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: This was a randomized, double-blind, crossover comparative study to verify the efficacy of antihistamines that differ in structural system. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with moderate or more severe Japanese cedar pollen-induced allergic rhinitis were randomized to receive either placebo, desloratadine 5 mg (a tricyclic), or levocetirizine 5 mg (a piperazine). One dose of the study drug was orally administered at 9 pm on the day before a pollen exposure test, which was performed for 3 h (9 a.m. to 12 p.m.) to assess symptoms in an environmental challenge chamber (ECC). Nasal and ocular symptoms were compared at an airborne pollen level of 8,000 grains/m3. The primary endpoint was mean total nasal symptom score (TNSS) from 120 to 180 min in the ECC. Subjects with a difference of ≥1 in TNSS between 2 drugs were extracted to the relevant drug-responsive group. RESULTS: The difference in TNSS from placebo was -2.42 (p < 0.0001) with levocetirizine and -1.66 (p < 0.01) with desloratadine, showing that both drugs were significantly more effective than placebo in controlling symptoms, but with no statistically significant difference between the 2 drugs. There were 12 subjects in the desloratadine-responsive group and 24 subjects in the levocetirizine-responsive group, with no contributor to response was detected. CONCLUSION: Levocetirizine tended to control nasal symptoms more effectively than desloratadine. However, the response to each antihistamine varied among individuals and the predictors to the response are unknown. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN ID: UMIN000029653.


Asunto(s)
Cedrus/inmunología , Cetirizina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H1 no Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Loratadina/análogos & derivados , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Cetirizina/efectos adversos , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H1 no Sedantes/efectos adversos , Humanos , Loratadina/efectos adversos , Loratadina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Placebos/administración & dosificación , Polen/inmunología
12.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 29(3): 214-217, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30823944

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of desloratadine citrate disodium on serum immunological function indices (IgE, C3 and C4), inflammatory factors (IL-4, IL-17 and IL-33), and chemokines (MCP-1, RANTES and Eotaxin) in patients with chronic urticaria. STUDY DESIGN: An experimental study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Department of Dermatology, Shaanxi Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xi'an, China, from January 2017 to January 2018. METHODOLOGY: A total of 128 patients with chronic urticaria were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, with 64 patients in each group. The patients in the control group were treated with loratadine and those in the observation group were treated with desloratadine citrate disodium. After 4 weeks of treatment, the serum levels of immune function indices (IgE, C3 and C4), inflammatory factors (IL-4, IL-17 and IL-33), and chemokines (MCP-1, RANTES and Eotaxin) were determined. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of treatment, the levels of serum IgE, IL-4, IL-17, IL-33, MCP-1, RANTES and Eotaxin in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (all p<0.001). The levels of serum C3 and C4 in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (both p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Desloratadine citrate disodium can effectively reduce the severity of chronic urticaria, and its therapeutic mechanism may be related to balancing Th1/Th2 cell function, regulating inflammatory mediators and inhibiting the action of chemokines.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores/sangre , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/uso terapéutico , Loratadina/análogos & derivados , Urticaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Adulto , Quimiocina CCL5/sangre , Quimiocinas/sangre , China , Enfermedad Crónica , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Humanos , Interleucinas/sangre , Loratadina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valores de Referencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Urticaria/diagnóstico , Urticaria/inmunología
13.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 44(5): e164-e170, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30828851

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Solar urticaria (SU) is a rare photodermatosis causing a significant impact on patients' quality of life (QoL), and treatment is often challenging. AIM: To analyse clinical experience with a tailored stepwise therapeutic approach. METHODS: A retrospective cohort design was used. Patients with suspected SU underwent laboratory investigations and photoprovocation. Those with a high minimal urticaria dose (MUD) were treated with a single antihistamine (protocol 1), and those with a lower MUD received three types of antihistamines (protocol 2); both protocols included a leucotriene receptor antagonist (LRA). In cases of failure, treatment was switched to omalizumab at doses of < 300 mg/month with incremental dosage increases as necessary (monthly dose range, 150-600 mg/month). Symptom relief and photoprovocation under treatment were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 30 patients (10 men, 20 women) were enrolled. Most (87%) were sensitive to visible light (1-70 J/cm2 ) with or without extension to ultraviolet A. Of the 30 patients, 23 opted for our stepwise approach: 22 achieved complete remission on protocols 1 or 2 (n = 17) or after switching to omalizumab (n = 5), and another patient achieved partial remission under omalizumab. There were no treatment-related severe adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of SU can be well controlled by treatment with antihistamines and an LRA tailored to the degree of photosensitivity, followed by omalizumab in refractory cases. This has important implications for patient QoL.


Asunto(s)
Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/uso terapéutico , Omalizumab/uso terapéutico , Trastornos por Fotosensibilidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Urticaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Acetatos/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Cetirizina/uso terapéutico , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Ciclopropanos , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Loratadina/análogos & derivados , Loratadina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sulfuros , Terfenadina/análogos & derivados , Terfenadina/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
15.
Trials ; 20(1): 802, 2019 Dec 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31888713

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common allergic disease. It affects people worldwide and traditional Chinese medicine is becoming popular among AR patients because it has a definite clinical effect and there are few adverse reactions. Lung qi deficiency and cold syndrome (LQDCS) is a frequent type of AR, and the Chinese herbal medicine bimin decoction (BMD) is prescribed for it. This study compared the clinical efficacy of BMD for AR patients with LQDCS to the conventional medicine loratadine and fluticasone nasal spray. METHODS: The study was an open-label non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. A total of 108 AR patients with LQDCS aged 19 to 60 were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the BMD group or the control group by the central computer system in Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2017 to April 2018. In total, 98 participants completed the study (BMD group n = 51 and control group n = 47). Patients in the BMD group received BMD while those in the control group received fluticasone nasal spray and loratadine tablets for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) between the baseline and the end of treatment. Changes in the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), nasal resistance, and acoustic rhinometry parameters were secondary outcomes. All side effects due to the treatments were recorded. RESULTS: After the 4-week treatment, the total TNSS was significantly reduced in both groups compared to the baseline (P <  0.05). No significant between-groups differences were observed for changes in TNSS scores [- 0.298 (95% confidence interval -0.640 to 0.140)], which was within the defined non-inferiority margin. RQLQ in both groups decreased significantly (P <  0.001) from baseline, though a more obvious reduction was observed for the BMD group (P <  0.001). There were no significant differences in nasal resistance, nasal volume, or nasal minimum cross-sectional area between groups after treatment (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that BMD helps relieve the symptoms of perennial AR and improves rhinitis-related quality of life. Our study indicates that BMD is non-inferior to loratadine tablets and fluticasone nasal spray for AR patients with LQDCS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-INR-16010063. Registered on 2 December 2016.


Asunto(s)
Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/uso terapéutico , Fluticasona/uso terapéutico , Loratadina/uso terapéutico , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obstrucción Nasal , Rociadores Nasales , Calidad de Vida , Estornudo/efectos de los fármacos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
16.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-773684

RESUMEN

To analyze the efficacy and safety of Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets combined with desloratadine as well as desloratadine alone in the treatment of chronic urticaria by Meta-analysis,in order to provide evidence-based reference for clinical treatment.PubMed,CBM,Wan Fang,VIP database and CNKI database were retrieved to collect randomized controlled trials( RCT) about Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets combined with desloratadine( test group) as well as desloratadine alone( control group) in the treatment of chronic urticaria. Meta-analysis was performed by using Rev Man 5. 3 software after data extraction and quality evaluation( a total of 15 RCTs were included,involving 1 411 patients). Meta-analysis showed that the total effective rate( RR = 1. 28,95%CI[1. 22,1. 35],P<0. 000 01) and the quality of life improvement rate( RR = 1. 49,95% CI[1. 33,1. 66],P< 0. 000 01) of the test group were better than those of the control group,and the recurrence rate( RR = 0. 29,95%CI[0. 21,0. 40],P<0. 000 01) was significantly lower than that of the control group,with statistically significant differences; there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions( RR = 1. 02,95%CI[0. 68,1. 53],P = 0. 92) compared with the control group. Based on the included RCTs,the efficacy of Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets combined with desloratadine in the treatment of chronic urticaria were superior to those of desloratadine alone,with similarity in safety. However,due to the low quality of RCTs and the lack of large-scale multi-center studies,the results shall not be further verified by clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos , Usos Terapéuticos , Glicósidos , Usos Terapéuticos , Loratadina , Usos Terapéuticos , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Comprimidos , Tripterygium , Química , Urticaria , Quimioterapia
17.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 97(23): e10961, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29879045

RESUMEN

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of Qingfeijianpi therapy for persistent allergic rhinitis (AR).A total of 101 patients with persistent AR were included into the study. These patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: treatment group, in which patients were given Qingfeijianpi decoction (1 dose/day for 4 weeks); control group, in which patients were given an oral dose of loratadine (tablet, 10 mg/time, once per day for 4 weeks). A total of 96 patients completed the 16-week course of treatment. The nasal symptom and traditional Chinese medicine syndrome were scored to evaluate symptom improvement, and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life of patients. Furthermore, the 4-week clinical treatment effect and 16-week follow up were evaluated.After the 4-week treatment, the mean difference in symptom score in the treatment group was similar to that in the control group. However, during the follow-up, the decrease in symptom score was better with the Qingfeijianpi therapy than with loratadine.Compared to loratadine, the Qingfeijianpi decoction exhibited a significant benefit in symptom improvement of persistent AR.


Asunto(s)
Antialérgicos/administración & dosificación , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/administración & dosificación , Rinitis Alérgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Loratadina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Bioanalysis ; 10(9): 659-671, 2018 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29749249

RESUMEN

AIM: Evaluation of HPLC-high-resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC-HRMS) full scan with polarity switching for increasing throughput of human in vitro cocktail drug-drug interaction assay. MATERIALS & METHODS: Microsomal incubates were analyzed using a high resolution and high mass accuracy Q-Exactive mass spectrometer to collect integrated qualitative and quantitative (qual/quant) data. RESULTS: Within assay, positive-to-negative polarity switching HPLC-HRMS method allowed quantification of eight and two probe compounds in the positive and negative ionization modes, respectively, while monitoring for LOR and its metabolites. CONCLUSION: LOR-inhibited CYP2C19 and showed higher activity for CYP2D6, CYP2E1 and CYP3A4. Overall, LC-HRMS-based nontargeted full scan quantitation allowed to improve the throughput of the in vitro cocktail drug-drug interaction assay.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores Enzimáticos del Citocromo P-450/administración & dosificación , Sistema Enzimático del Citocromo P-450/metabolismo , Ensayos Analíticos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Loratadina/administración & dosificación , Microsomas Hepáticos/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Oral , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión/métodos , Exactitud de los Datos , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Humanos , Espectrometría de Masas/métodos , Microsomas Hepáticos/enzimología , Estándares de Referencia
19.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 6(5): 1726-1732.e6, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29425904

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A fixed-dose combination of intranasal azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate (MP-AzeFlu) is the most effective treatment of allergic rhinitis, but its onset of action requires further investigation. OBJECTIVE: To compare the onset of action of MP-AzeFlu with the free combination of oral loratadine (LORA) and intranasal fluticasone propionate (INFP). METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, 3-period crossover trial, allergic rhinitis symptoms were induced in asymptomatic patients by ragweed pollen challenge in an allergen environmental exposure chamber. Patients received single-dose MP-AzeFlu, LORA/INFP, or placebo and were monitored for 4 hours. The primary outcome was onset of action measured by total nasal symptom score (TNSS). Secondary measures were total ocular symptom score (TOSS), total score of the 7 nasal and ocular symptoms (T7SS), and the global visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: The full analysis set included 82 patients, of which 78 completed all treatments. TNSS was significantly reduced versus placebo from 5 minutes for MP-AzeFlu and 150 minutes for LORA/INFP onward (both P < .05) till the end of assessment (0-4 hours). MP-AzeFlu reduced TNSS to a greater extent at each time point from 5 to 90 minutes (P < .05) and over the entire assessment interval (P ≤ .005) versus LORA/INFP or placebo. No statistically significant difference between LORA/INFP and placebo was observed over the assessment interval (P = .182). The onset of action of MP-AzeFlu assessed by TOSS, T7SS, and VAS was 10 minutes, 2 hours earlier than with LORA/INFP. CONCLUSION: MP-AzeFlu had a more rapid onset of action (5 minutes) and was more effective than LORA/INFP.


Asunto(s)
Combinación de Medicamentos , Fluticasona/uso terapéutico , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Rinitis Alérgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intranasal , Adulto , Alérgenos/inmunología , Ambrosia/inmunología , Antígenos de Plantas/inmunología , Cámaras de Exposición Atmosférica , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Loratadina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obstrucción Nasal , Polen/inmunología
20.
J Integr Med ; 15(6): 462-468, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29103416

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Zingiber cassumunar Roxb., commonly known as Phlai in Thai, has been used as a traditional medicine in Thailand for the treatment of various diseases, including inflammation and chronic airway disease. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the antihistaminic effect of Phlai on skin testing. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION: This was a randomized, open-label, three-way crossover study. Twenty allergic rhinitis (AR) patients were enrolled. In randomized sequence, patients received a single dose of Phlai capsules (100 or 200 mg) or loratadine (10 mg) with a washout period of 1 week between each treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Skin prick testing for histamine and common aeroallergen (house dust mite) were performed before treatment and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours of treatment. The main treatment outcomes were the mean wheal and flare responses to the skin prick test after treatment. RESULTS: Both 100 mg and 200 mg Phlai doses suppressed wheal and flare responses to house dust mite allergen, but only 200 mg of Phlai capsules significantly suppressed wheal and flare responses to histamine. Repeated measures analysis of variance showed that loratadine caused more wheal and flare suppression than Phlai capsules in responses to the histamine skin prick test. However, there were no significant differences among the effects of 100 mg Phlai capsules, 200 mg Phlai capsules and loratadine in suppression of wheal and flare induced by the mite skin prick test. Both doses of Phlai were well-tolerated with no adverse events. CONCLUSION: Both 100 mg (compound D 4 mg) and 200 mg (compound D 8 mg) Phlai capsules, when taken as a single therapeutic dose, inhibited skin reactivity to histamine and mite skin prick tests in AR patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai clinical trial registry (TCTR20160510001).


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/farmacología , Histamina , Extractos Vegetales/farmacología , Rinitis Alérgica , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Zingiberaceae , Adulto , Alérgenos/farmacología , Animales , Antialérgicos/farmacología , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Histamina/farmacología , Humanos , Loratadina/farmacología , Ácaros , Fitoterapia , Rinitis Alérgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Pruebas Cutáneas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA