Assessing the cost-effectiveness of integrated case management of Neglected Tropical Diseases in Liberia.

BACKGROUND: In 2017, Liberia became one of the first countries in the African region to develop and implement a national strategy for integrated case management of Neglected Tropical Diseases (CM-NTDs), specifically Buruli ulcer, leprosy, lymphatic filariasis morbidities, and yaws. Implementing this plan moves the NTD program from many countries' fragmented (vertical) disease management. This study explores to what extent an integrated approach offers a cost-effective investment for national health systems. METHODS: This study is a mixed-method economic evaluation that explores the cost-effectiveness of the integrated CM-NTDs approach compared to the fragmented (vertical) disease management. Primary data were collected from two integrated intervention counties and two non-intervention counties to determine the relative cost-effectiveness of the integrated program model vs. fragmented (vertical) care. Data was sourced from the NTDs program annual budgets and financial reports for integrated CM-NTDs and Mass Drug Administration (MDA) to determine cost drivers and effectiveness. RESULTS: The total cost incurred by the integrated CM-NTD approach from 2017 to 2019 was US$ 789,856.30, with the highest percentage of costs for program staffing and motivation (41.8%), followed by operating costs (24.8%). In the two counties implementing fragmented (vertical) disease management, approximately US$ 325,000 was spent on the diagnosis of 84 persons and the treatment of twenty-four persons suffering from NTDs. While 2.5 times as much was spent in integrated counties, 9-10 times more patients were diagnosed and treated. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of a patient being diagnosed under the fragmented (vertical) implementation is five times higher than integrated CM-NTDs, and providing treatment is ten times as costly. Findings indicate that the integrated CM-NTDs strategy has achieved its primary objective of improved access to NTD services. The success of implementing an integrated CM-NTDs approach in Liberia, presented in this paper, demonstrates that NTD integration is a cost-minimizing solution.

Addressing challenges in tuberculosis adherence via performance-based payments for integrated case management: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial in Georgia.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is one of the greatest global health concerns and disease management is challenging particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Despite improvements in addressing this epidemic in Georgia, tuberculosis remains a significant public health concern due to sub-optimal patient management. Low remuneration for specialists, limited private-sector interest in provision of infectious disease care and incomplete integration in primary care are at the core of this problem. METHODS: This protocol sets out the methods of a two-arm cluster randomized control trial which aims to generate evidence on the effectiveness of a performance-based financing and integrated care intervention on tuberculosis loss to follow-up and treatment adherence. The trial will be implemented in health facilities (clusters) under-performing in tuberculosis management. Eligible and consenting facilities will be randomly assigned to either intervention or control (standard care). Health providers within intervention sites will form a case management team and be trained in the delivery of integrated tuberculosis care; performance-related payments based on monthly records of patients adhering to treatment and quality of care assessments will be disbursed to health providers in these facilities. The primary outcomes include loss to follow-up among adult pulmonary drug-sensitive and drug-resistant tuberculosis patients. Secondary outcomes are adherence to treatment among drug-sensitive and drug-resistant tuberculosis patients and treatment success among drug-sensitive tuberculosis patients. Data on socio-demographic characteristics, tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment regimen will also be collected. The required sample size to detect a 6% reduction in loss to follow-up among drug-sensitive tuberculosis patients and a 20% reduction in loss to follow-up among drug-resistant tuberculosis patients is 948 and 136 patients, respectively. DISCUSSION: The trial contributes to a limited body of rigorous evidence and literature on the effectiveness of supply-side performance-based financing interventions on tuberculosis patient outcomes. Realist and health economic evaluations will be conducted in parallel with the trial, and associated composite findings will serve as a resource for the Georgian and wider regional Ministries of Health in relation to future tuberculosis and wider health policies. The trial and complementing evaluations are part of Results4TB, a multidisciplinary collaboration engaging researchers and Georgian policy and practice stakeholders in the design and evaluation of a context-sensitive tuberculosis management intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN14667607 . Registered on 14 January 2019.

The added value of a mobile application of Community Case Management on referral, re-consultation and hospitalization rates of children aged under 5 years in two districts in Northern Malawi: study protocol for a pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence to suggest that frontline community health workers in Malawi are under-referring children to higher-level facilities. Integrating a digitized version of paper-based methods of Community Case Management (CCM) could strengthen delivery, increasing urgent referral rates and preventing unnecessary re-consultations and hospital admissions. This trial aims to evaluate the added value of the Supporting LIFE electronic Community Case Management Application (SL eCCM App) compared to paper-based CCM on urgent referral, re-consultation and hospitalization rates, in two districts in Northern Malawi. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial assessing the added value of the SL eCCM App on urgent referral, re-consultation and hospitalization rates of children aged 2 months and older to up to 5 years, within 7 days of the index visit. One hundred and two health surveillance assistants (HSAs) were stratified into six clusters based on geographical location, and clusters randomized to the timing of crossover to the intervention using simple, computer-generated randomization. Training workshops were conducted prior to the control (paper-CCM) and intervention (paper-CCM + SL eCCM App) in assigned clusters. Neither participants nor study personnel were blinded to allocation. Outcome measures were determined by abstraction of clinical data from patient records 2 weeks after recruitment. A nested qualitative study explored perceptions of adherence to urgent referral recommendations and a cost evaluation determined the financial and time-related costs to caregivers of subsequent health care utilization. The trial was conducted between July 2016 and February 2017. DISCUSSION: This is the first large-scale trial evaluating the value of adding a mobile application of CCM to the assessment of children aged under 5 years. The trial will generate evidence on the potential use of mobile health for CCM in Malawi, and more widely in other low- and middle-income countries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02763345 . Registered on 3 May 2016.

Does case management for patients with heart failure based in the community reduce unplanned hospital admissions? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled trials (non-RCTs, NRCTs) is to investigate the effectiveness and related costs of case management (CM) for patients with heart failure (HF) predominantly based in the community in reducing unplanned readmissions and length of stay (LOS). SETTING: CM initiated either while as an inpatient, or on discharge from acute care hospitals, or in the community and then continuing on in the community. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with a diagnosis of HF and resident in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. INTERVENTION: CM based on nurse coordinated multicomponent care which is applicable to the primary care-based health systems. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Primary outcomes of interest were unplanned (re)admissions, LOS and any related cost data. Secondary outcomes were primary healthcare resources. RESULTS: 22 studies were included: 17 RCTs and 5 NRCTs. 17 studies described hospital-initiated CM (n=4794) and 5 described community-initiated CM of HF (n=3832). Hospital-initiated CM reduced readmissions (rate ratio 0.74 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.92), p=0.008) and LOS (mean difference -1.28 days (95% CI -2.04 to -0.52), p=0.001) in favour of CM compared with usual care. 9 trials described cost data of which 6 reported no difference between CM and usual care. There were 4 studies of community-initiated CM versus usual care (2 RCTs and 2 NRCTs) with only the 2 NRCTs showing a reduction in admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital-initiated CM can be successful in reducing unplanned hospital readmissions for HF and length of hospital stay for people with HF. 9 trials described cost data; no clear difference emerged between CM and usual care. There was limited evidence for community-initiated CM which suggested it does not reduce admission.

Cost-effectiveness of nurse-based case management versus usual care for elderly patients with myocardial infarction: results from the KORINNA study.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of a case management intervention by trained nurses in elderly (≥65 years) patients with myocardial infarction from a societal perspective. METHODS: The intervention and observation period spanned 1 year and 329 participants were enrolled. The intervention consisted of at least one home visit and quarterly telephone calls. Data on resource use and quality of life were collected quarterly. The primary measurements of effect were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), based on the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) health utilities from the German time trade-off. The secondary measurements were EQ-5D-3L utility values and patients' self-rated health states according to the visual analogue scale (VAS) among survivors. To estimate mean differences, a linear regression model was used for QALYs and a gamma model for costs. Health states among the survivors were analysed using linear mixed models. To assess the impact of different health state valuation methods, VAS-adjusted life years were constructed. RESULTS: The mean difference in QALYs was small and not significant (-0.0163; CI -0.0681-0.0354, p value: 0.536, n = 297). Among survivors, EQ-5D-3L utilities showed significant improvements within 6 months in the intervention group (0.051; CI 0.0028-0.0989; p value: 0.0379, n = 280) but returned towards baseline levels by month 12. The mean improvement in self-rated health (VAS) within 1 year was significantly larger in the intervention group (+9.2, CI 4.665-13.766, p value: <0.0001, n = 266). The overall cost difference was -17.61 (CI - 2,601-2,615; p value: 0.9856, n = 297). The difference in VAS-adjusted life years was 0.0378 (CI -0.0040-0.0796, p value: 0.0759, n = 297). CONCLUSIONS: This study could not provide evidence to conclude that the case management intervention was an effective and cost-effective alternative to usual care within a time horizon of 1 year.

Costing commodity and human resource needs for integrated community case management in thie differing community health strategies of Ethiopia, Kenya and Zambia.

BACKGROUND: To ensure correct and appropriate funding is available, there is a need to estimate resource needs for improved planning and implementation of integrated Community Case Management (iCCM). OBJECTIVE: To compare and estimate costs for commodity and human resource needs for iCCM, based on treatment coverage rates, bottlenecks and national targets in Ethiopia, Kenya and Zambia from 2014 to 2016. METHODS: Resource needs were estimated using Ministry of Health (MoH) targets fronm 2014 to 2016 for implementation of case management of pneumonia, diarrhea and malaria through iCCM based on epidemiological, demographic, economic, intervention coverage and other health system parameters. Bottleneck analysis adjusted cost estimates against system barriers. Ethiopia, Kenya and Zambia were chosen to compare differences in iCCM costs in different programmatic implementation landscapes. RESULTS: Coverage treatment rates through iCCM are lowest in Ethiopia, followed by Kenya and Zambia, but Ethiopia had the greatest increases between 2009 and 2012. Deployment of health extension workers (HEWs) in Ethiopia is more advanced compared to Kenya and Zambia, which have fewer equivalent cadres (called commu- nity health workers (CHWs)) covering a smaller proportion of the population. Between 2014 and 2016, the propor- tion of treatments through iCCM compared to health centres are set to increase from 30% to 81% in Ethiopia, 1% to 18% in Kenya and 3% to 22% in Zambia. The total estimated cost of iCCM for these three years are USD 75,531,376 for Ethiopia, USD 19,839,780 for Kenya and USD 33,667,742 for Zambia. Projected per capita expen- diture for 2016 is USD 0.28 for Ethiopia, USD 0.20 in Kenya and USD 0.98 in Zambia. Commodity costs for pneumonia and diarrhea were a small fraction of the total iCCM budget for all three countries (less than 3%), while around 80% of the costs related to human resources. CONCLUSION: Analysis of coverage, demography and epidemiology data improves estimates of fimding requirements for iCCM. Bottleneck analysis adjusts cost estimates by including system barriers, thus reflecting a more accurate estimate of potential resource utilization. Adding pneumonia and diarrhea interventions to existing large scale community-based malaria case management programs is likely to require relatively small and nationally affordable investments. iCCM can be implemented for USD 0.09 to 0.98 per capita per annum, depending on the stage of scale-up and targets set by the MoH.

[Implementing models of cross-sectoral mental health care (integrated health care, regional psychiatry budget) in Germany: systematic literature review]. / Systematische Literaturübersicht zur Implementierung der sektorübergreifenden Versorgung (Regionalbudget, integrierte Versorgung) in Deutschland.

OBJECTIVE: Cross-sectoral integrated health-care and the regional psychiatry budget are two models of cross-sectoral health care (comprising in-patient and out-patient care) in Germany. Both models of financing were created in order to overcome the so-called fragmentation in German health care. The regional psychiatry budget is a specific solution for psychiatric services whereas integrated health care models can be developed for all areas of health care. The purpose of this overview is to elucidate both the current state of implementation of these models and the results of evaluation research. METHODS: Systematic literature review, additional manual search. RESULTS: 28 journal articles and 38 websites referring to 21 projects were identified. The projects are highly heterogenuous in terms of size, included populations and services, aims, and steering-function (concerning the different pathways of care). CONCLUSIONS: The projects yield innovative models of mental health care capable of competing with the co-existing traditional financing systems of in-patient and out-patient services. The future of mental health care organisation in Germany is currently open and under political discussion.

The UP-TECH project, an intervention to support caregivers of Alzheimer's disease patients in Italy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The epidemic of Alzheimer's disease (AD) represents a significant challenge for the health care and social service systems of many developed countries. AD affects both patients and family caregivers, on whom the main burden of care falls, putting them at higher risk of stress, anxiety, mortality and lower quality of life. Evidence remains controversial concerning the effectiveness of providing support to caregivers of AD patients, through case management, counseling, training, technological devices and the integration of existing care services. The main objectives of the UP-TECH project are: 1) to reduce the care burden of family caregivers of AD patients; and 2) to maintain AD patients at home. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 450 dyads comprising AD patients and their caregivers in five health districts of the Marche region, Italy, will be randomized into three study arms. Participants in the first study arm will receive comprehensive care and support from a case manager (an ad hoc trained social worker) (UP group). Subjects in the second study arm will be similarly supported by a case manager, but in addition will receive a technological toolkit (UP-TECH group). Participants in the control arm will only receive brochures regarding available services. All subjects will be visited at home by a trained nurse who will assess them using a standardized questionnaire at enrollment (M0), 6 months (M6) and 12 months (M12). Follow-up telephone interviews are scheduled at 24 months (M24). The primary outcomes are: 1) caregiver burden, measured using the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI); and 2) the actual number of days spent at home during the study period, defined as the number of days free from institutionalizations, hospitalizations and stays in an observation unit of an emergency room. DISCUSSION: The UP-TECH project protocol integrates previous evidence on the effectiveness of strategies in dementia care, that is, the use of case management, new technologies, nurse home visits and efforts toward the integration of existing services in an ambitious holistic design. The analysis of different interventions is expected to provide sound evidence of the effectiveness and cost of programs supporting AD patients in the community. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01700556.

Case management and self-management support for frequent users with chronic disease in primary care: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic diseases represent a major challenge for health care and social services. A number of people with chronic diseases require more services due to characteristics that increase their vulnerability. Given the burden of increasingly vulnerable patients on primary care, a pragmatic intervention in four Family Medicine Groups (primary care practices in Quebec, Canada) has been proposed for individuals with chronic diseases (diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, musculoskeletal diseases and/or chronic pain) who are frequent users of hospital services. The intervention combines case management by a nurse with group support meetings encouraging self-management based on the Stanford Chronic Disease Self-Management Program. The goals of this study are to: (1) analyze the implementation of the intervention in the participating practices in order to determine how the various contexts have influenced the implementation and the observed effects; (2) evaluate the proximal (self-efficacy, self-management, health habits, activation and psychological distress) and intermediate (empowerment, quality of life and health care use) effects of the intervention on patients; (3) conduct an economic analysis of the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. METHODS/DESIGN: The analysis of the implementation will be conducted using realistic evaluation and participatory approaches within four categories of stakeholders (Family Medicine Group and health centre management, Family Medicine Group practitioners, patients and their families, health centre or community partners). The data will be obtained through individual and group interviews, project documentation reviews and by documenting the intervention. Evaluation of the effects on patients will be based on a pragmatic randomized before-after experimental design with a delayed intervention control group (six months). Economic analysis will include cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis. DISCUSSION: The integration of a case management intervention delivered by nurses and self-management group support into primary care practices has the potential to positively impact patient empowerment and quality of life and hopefully reduce the burden on health care. Decision-makers, managers and health care professionals will be aware of the factors to consider in promoting the implementation of this intervention into other primary care practices in the region and elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01719991.

Readmissions of patients with diabetes mellitus and foot ulcers after infra-popliteal bypass surgery - attacking the problem by an integrated case management model.

BACKGROUND: Patients with neuroischemic diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) may need arterial revascularization, minor amputations, débridements as well as meticulous wound care. Unfortunately, postoperative outpatient care is frequently inadequate. This is especially true for Germany, where the in- and outpatient sectors are funded and managed separately, with poor communication between the two. Thus, many patients may be readmitted to the hospital following successful treatment and discharge. In an attempt to overcome these problems, we looked at whether an integrated case management (CM) system for outpatient care according to in-hospital standards might improve patients care and avoid readmissions. In addition we analyzed the length of hospital stay (LOS) as well as hospital costs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study patients with DFS, bypass surgery and foot surgery after implementation of the CM (study group; n = 376) were compared with a matched historic control group (HCG; n = 190) including the flat rate revenues (G-DRG K01B). Following a standardized assessment, integrated trans-sectoral CM care was offered to 116 patients (CMP). RESULTS: The proportion of patients who were readmitted to hospital was reduced in CMP compared to HCG (8.8 vs. 16.4 %; p < 0.01), with consequent reduction of case consolidations (9.7 % versus 17.8 %, p < 0.001). Although initially, the mean LOS was higher in the CMP patients, the reduction in readmissions meant that this integrated CM program improved the hospital's economic situation. CONCLUSIONS: A hospital-based integrated CM system significantly reduces the hospital readmissions in patients with neuroischemic DFS following bypass surgery, with lower hospital costs.

Creating clinical and economic "wins" through integrated case management: lessons for physicians and health system administrators.

The 5% of patients using 50% of health resources commonly have interacting and persistent multimorbid illnesses; concurrent mental health problems; impaired social networks; and/or difficulties in accessing care through the health system. To improve outcomes in these patients, it is necessary to overcome clinical and nonclinical barriers that lead to poor health, treatment resistance, high health care cost, and disability. This article describes an innovative complexity-based and outcome-oriented approach using integrated case management. It helps treating physicians and health administrators understand how to incorporate value-based case managers to optimize care for complex patients while better utilizing resources.

Counting the costs: case management implications of spinal cord stimulation treatment for failed back surgery syndrome.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to review clinical and health economic evidence supporting the use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) and to discuss implications for case managers' decision making. PRIMARY PRACTICE SETTINGS: Primary settings include hospital and home environments. FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS: Patients with FBSS experience persistent or recurring pain in the lower back, legs, or both after one or more spinal surgeries. Surgical revision and nonsurgical FBSS therapies often result in minimal or no clinical improvement, and reoperations often result in more pain. The efficacy and safety of SCS have improved as a result of earlier intervention, technological advances, and increased awareness of SCS proper patient selection. A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that at mean 3-year follow-up, SCS achieves significantly more pain relief and treatment satisfaction and lower opiate analgesic use than reoperation in patients with FBSS. Another RCT demonstrated that at 6-month follow-up, more patients with FBSS achieve pain relief, enhanced quality of life, improved functioning, and higher treatment satisfaction levels with SCS than with conventional medical management (CMM). Health-economic FBSS studies show that SCS is more cost-effective than CMM or reoperation. SCS is a well-established FBSS treatment option with demonstrated efficacy and cost-effectiveness in selected patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR CM PRACTICE: Case Managers should consider recommending SCS as one modality prior to reoperation in patients with FBSS who meet the clinical criteria for its appropriate use.

Strategies for diagnosis and treatment of suspected leptospirosis: a cost-benefit analysis.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms and signs of leptospirosis are non-specific. Several diagnostic tests for leptospirosis are available and in some instances are being used prior to treatment of leptospirosis-suspected patients. There is therefore a need to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the different treatment strategies in order to avoid misuse of scarce resources and ensure best possible health outcomes for patients. METHODS: The study population was adult patients, presented with uncomplicated acute febrile illness, without an obvious focus of infection or malaria or typical dengue infection. We compared the cost and effectiveness of 5 management strategies: 1) no patients tested or given antibiotic treatment; 2) all patients given empirical doxycycline treatment; patients given doxycycline when a patient is tested positive for leptospirosis using: 3) lateral flow; 4) MCAT; 5) latex test. The framework used is a cost-benefit analysis, accounting for all direct medical costs in diagnosing and treating patients suspected of leptospirosis. Outcomes are measured in length of fever after treatment which is then converted to productivity losses to capture the full economic costs. FINDINGS: Empirical doxycycline treatment was the most efficient strategy, being both the least costly alternative and the one that resulted in the shortest duration of fever. The limited sensitivity of all three diagnostic tests implied that their use to guide treatment was not cost-effective. The most influential parameter driving these results was the cost of treating patients with complications for patients who did not receive adequate treatment as a result of incorrect diagnosis or a strategy of no-antibiotic-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should continue treating suspected cases of leptospirosis on an empirical basis. This conclusion holds true as long as policy makers are not prioritizing the reduction of use of antibiotics, in which case the use of the latex test would be the most efficient strategy.

A cost effectiveness study of integrated care in health services delivery: a diabetes program in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is rapidly growing as a proportion of the disease burden in Australia as elsewhere. This study addresses the cost effectiveness of an integrated approach to assisting general practitioners (GPs) with diabetes management. This approach uses a centralized database of clinical data of an Australian Division of General Practice (a network of GPs) to co-ordinate care according to national guidelines. METHODS: Long term outcomes for patients in the program were derived using clinical parameters after 5 years of program participation, and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model, to project outcomes for 40 years from the time of diagnosis and from 5 years post-diagnosis. Cost information was obtained from a range of sources. While program costs are directly available, and costs of complications can be estimated from the UKPDS model, other costs are estimated by comparing costs in the Division with average costs across the state or the nation. The outcome and cost measures are used derive incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: The clinical data show that the program is effective in the short term, with improvement or no statistical difference in most clinical measures over 5 years. Average HbA1c levels increased by less than expected over the 5 year period. While the program is estimated to generate treatment cost savings, overall net costs are positive. However, the program led to projected improvements in expected life years and Quality Adjusted Life Expectancy (QALE), with incremental cost effectiveness ratios of $A8,106 per life-year saved and $A9,730 per year of QALE gained. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of an established model of diabetes progression and generally available data has provided an opportunity to establish robust methods of testing the cost effectiveness of a program for which a formal control group was not available. Based on this methodology, integrated health care delivery provided by a network of GPs improved health outcomes of type 2 diabetics with acceptable cost effectiveness, which suggests that similar outcomes may be obtained elsewhere.

[Back to work--how can this be achieved?]. / Rückkehr zur Arbeitsfähigkeit--wie ist dies zu erreichen?

Disability and loss of earning capacity cost private businesses and the social insurance providers a lot of money in Germany. It is particularly difficult for persons with impaired performance capacity to return to working life. To ensure that the available resources are used as efficiently as possible, the law-makers have re-calibrated the legal framework. In this context, consistent, start-to-finish case management promises high success rates. This can be achieved by private rehab services, as shown in this article.

Effects of lifestyle intervention on health care costs: Improving Control with Activity and Nutrition (ICAN).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate program and health care costs of a lifestyle intervention in a high-risk obese population. DESIGN: Twelve-month randomized controlled trial comparing lifestyle case management to usual care. SUBJECTS/SETTING: Health plan members (n=147) with obesity (body mass index >/=27) and type 2 diabetes. INTERVENTION: Lifestyle case management entailed individual and group education, support, and referrals by registered dietitians. Those in the usual-care group received educational material. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical and pharmaceutical health care costs reimbursed by the participant's primary insurance company. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Total costs were modeled using the four-equation model using previous year cost as a predictor. RESULTS: Net cost of the intervention was $328 per person per year. After incorporating program costs, mean health plan costs were $3,586 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -$8,036, -$25, P<0.05) lower in case management compared to usual care. The difference was driven by group differences in medical (-$3,316, 95% CI: -$7,829 to -$320, P<0.05) but not pharmaceutical costs (-$239, 95% CI: -$870 to $280, not statistically significant), with fewer inpatient admissions and costs among case management compared with usual care (admission prevalence: 2.8% vs 22.5% respectively, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Addition of a modest-cost, registered dietitian-led lifestyle case-management intervention to usual medical care did not increase health care costs and suggested modest cost savings among obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Larger trials are needed to determine whether these results can be replicated in a broader population. The findings can be judiciously applied to support that the addition of a registered dietitian-led lifestyle case-management program to medical care does not increase health care costs.

The influence of a continuum of care model on the rehabilitation of compensation claimants with soft tissue disorders.

STUDY DESIGN: Population-based before-and-after design with concurrent control group. OBJECTIVE: As continuums of care have been little studied, we evaluated the impact of the Workers' Compensation Board of Alberta (WCB-Alberta) model on sustained return to work, satisfaction with care, and cost. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Musculoskeletal conditions, such as back pain, continue to be leading causes of disability and work loss. From 1996 through 1997, the WCB-Alberta implemented a continuum of care model to guide rehabilitation service delivery for claimants with soft tissue injury. The model was designed as a decision-making tool to promote a consistent, evidence-based approach to care within the jurisdiction. METHODS: The model was implemented province-wide so the entire population of workers insured by the WCB-Alberta was studied. Data were extracted from the WCB-Alberta administrative database from 2 years before implementation (1994-1995) to 5 years after (1996-2000). An intervention group was created from patients filing soft tissue injury claims for the low back, ankle, knee, elbow, and shoulder. The comparison group was formed of workers experiencing fractures or other traumatic non-soft tissue injuries. Satisfaction was measured through surveys. Primary outcome was cumulative days receiving wage replacement benefits. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine the model's effect. RESULTS: Over the entire study period, 70,116 claimants filed soft tissue injury claims while 101,620 claimants experienced non-soft tissue injuries. Significant improvement was observed in intervention group return-to-work outcomes after model implementation (hazard ratio = 1.54). Median duration of benefits decreased from 13 to 8 days. Little change was seen in the control group's disability duration (median duration, consistently 10 days). The majority of claimants were satisfied with care received. Cost savings over a 2-year full implementation period was $21.5 million (Canadian). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a soft tissue injury continuum of care involving staged application of various types of rehabilitation services appears to have resulted in more rapid and sustained recovery.

Economic benefits of self-management education in COPD.

CONTEXT: There is emerging evidence that disease management with self-management education provided by a case manager might benefit COPD patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether disease management with self-management education is more cost-effective than usual care among previously hospitalized COPD patients. DESIGN: Economic analysis in conjunction with a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing patients conducting self-management with those receiving usual care over a 1-year follow-up period. SETTING: Respiratory referral centers. PATIENTS: One hundred ninety-one COPD patients who required hospitalization in the year preceding enrollment were recruited from seven respiratory outpatient clinics. INTERVENTION: In addition to usual care, patients in the intervention group received standardized education on COPD self-management program called "Living Well with COPD" with ongoing supervision by a case manager. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: From the perspective of the health-care payer, we compared costs between the two groups and estimated the program cost per hospitalization prevented (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the program). We repeated these estimates for several alternate scenarios of patient caseload. RESULTS: The additional cost of the self-management program as compared to usual care, $3,778 (2004 Canadian dollars) per patient, exceeded the savings of $3,338 per patient based on the study design with a caseload of 14 patients per case manager. However, through a highly plausible sensitivity analysis, it was showed that if case managers followed up 50 patients per year, the self-management intervention would be cost saving relative to usual care (cost saving of $2,149 per patient; 95% confidence interval, $38 to $4,258). With more realistic potential caseloads of 50 to 70 patients per case manager, estimated program costs would be $1,326 and $1,016 per prevented hospitalization, respectively. CONCLUSION: The program of self-management in COPD holds promise for positive economic benefits with increased patient caseload and rising costs of hospitalization.

[Innovative care models for treating psychosis]. / Neue Versorgungsmodelle in der Psychosebehandlung.

It is generally accepted that modern mental health care gives community treatment priority over partial or full inpatient treatment. The requirements for community treatment of severely ill and chronic psychiatric patients are complex and, together with financing by the different social insurance providers, may lead to a rather problematic fragmentation of health service supply. Schizophrenia is considered the most expensive mental illness in Germany. It is estimated that indirect costs (expressed in financial terms) are five times higher than the direct costs of treatment and care. Innovative concepts of psychosocial intervention show that case management and assertive community treatment reduce the hospitalisation rate and duration of inpatient treatment, enhance social integration, and find the approval of most patients. However, there is no empirical evidence supporting this "psychiatry with no beds". Consideration should be given to psychosocial interventions as an alternative to inpatient hospital treatment such as day hospital care, crisis houses, or acute home treatment.