Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 121(12): 2524-2535, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33612436

RESUMEN

During the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, health care practices have shifted to minimize virus transmission, with unprecedented expansion of telehealth. This study describes self-reported changes in registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) practice related to delivery of nutrition care via telehealth shortly after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. This cross-sectional, anonymous online survey was administered from mid-April to mid-May 2020 to RDNs in the United States providing face-to-face nutrition care prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. This survey included 54 questions about practitioner demographics and experience and current practices providing nutrition care via telehealth, including billing procedures, and was completed by 2016 RDNs with a median (interquartile range) of 15 (6-27) years of experience in dietetics practice. Although 37% of respondents reported that they provided nutrition care via telehealth prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, this proportion was 78% at the time of the survey. Respondents reported spending a median (interquartile range) of 30 (20-45) minutes in direct contact with the individual/group per telehealth session. The most frequently reported barriers to delivering nutrition care via telehealth were lack of client interest (29%) and Internet access (26%) and inability to conduct or evaluate typical nutrition assessment or monitoring/evaluation activities (28%). Frequently reported benefits included promoting compliance with social distancing (66%) and scheduling flexibility (50%). About half of RDNs or their employers sometimes or always bill for telehealth services, and of those, 61% are sometimes or always reimbursed. Based on RDN needs, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics continues to advocate and provide resources for providing effective telehealth and receiving reimbursement via appropriate coding and billing. Moving forward, it will be important for RDNs to participate fully in health care delivered by telehealth and telehealth research both during and after the COVID-19 public health emergency.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Terapia Nutricional/métodos , Terapia Nutricional/estadística & datos numéricos , Nutricionistas/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Atención a la Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Dietética/métodos , Dietética/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Nutricionistas/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Telemedicina/economía , Telemedicina/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
2.
Health Serv Res ; 55(4): 541-547, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32700385

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We aim to assess whether system providers perform better than nonsystem providers under an alternative payment model that incentivizes high-quality, cost-efficient care. We posit that the payment environment and the incentives it provides can affect the relative performance of vertically integrated health systems. To examine this potential influence, we compare system and nonsystem hospitals participating in Medicare's Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model. DATA SOURCES: We used hospital cost and quality data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services linked to data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Compendium of US Health Systems and hospital characteristics from secondary sources. The data include 706 hospitals in 67 metropolitan areas. STUDY DESIGN: We estimated regressions that compared system and nonsystem hospitals' 2017 cost and quality performance providing lower joint replacements among hospitals required to participate in CJR. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among CJR hospitals, system hospitals that provided comprehensive services in their local market had 5.8 percent ($1612) lower episode costs (P = .01) than nonsystem hospitals. System hospitals that did not provide such services had 3.5 percent ($967) lower episode costs (P = .14). Quality differences between system hospitals and nonsystem hospitals were mostly small and statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: When operating under alternative payment model incentives, vertical integration may enable hospitals to lower costs with similar quality scores.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/economía , Atención Integral de Salud/economía , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Integral de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
3.
Int J Health Econ Manag ; 18(4): 395-408, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29611068

RESUMEN

Maryland implemented one of the most aggressive payment innovations the nation has seen in several decades when it introduced global budgets in all its acute care hospitals in 2014. Prior to this, a pilot program, total patient revenue (TPR), was established for 8 rural hospitals in 2010. Using financial hospital report data from the Health Services Cost Review Commission from 2007 to 2013, we examined the hospitals' financial results including revenue, costs, and profit/loss margins to explore the impact of the adoption of the TPR pilot global budget program relative to the remaining hospitals in the state. We analyze financial results for both regulated (included in the global budget and subject to rate-setting) and unregulated services in order to capture a holistic image of the hospitals' actual revenue, cost and margin structures. Common size and difference-in-differences analyses of the data suggest that regulated profit ratios for treatment hospitals increased (from 5% in 2007 to 8% in 2013) and regulated expense-to-gross patient revenue ratios decreased (75% in 2007 and 68% in 2013) relative to the controls. Simultaneously, the profit margins for treatment hospitals' unregulated services decreased (- 12% in 2007 and - 17% in 2013), which reduced the overall margin significantly. This analysis therefore indicates cost shifting and less profit gain from the program than identified by solely focusing on the regulated margins.


Asunto(s)
Presupuestos/estadística & datos numéricos , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/legislación & jurisprudencia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estadística & datos numéricos , Asignación de Costos , Humanos , Maryland
4.
Health Policy ; 116(2-3): 196-205, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24314624

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To control increasing pharmaceutical expenditures, Taiwan's National Health Insurance has implemented a series of drug reimbursement price reductions since 2000. This study examined changes in use and expenditures of oral antidiabetic medications following the price regulation in November 2006. METHODS: We obtained claims data between January 2006 and August 2007 from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. We categorized oral antidiabetic products as affected by the reimbursement reduction ("targeted") or not ("non-targeted"), by level of relative price reduction, and by manufacturer type (international vs. local manufacturers). We used an interrupted time series design and segmented regression models to estimate changes in monthly per capita prescribing rate, volume, and insurance reimbursement expenditures following the policy. RESULTS: The majority (129/178; 72.5%) of oral antidiabetic products were targeted by this round of price reductions. There was a relative reduction of 9.5% [95%CI: -12.68, -6.32] in total expenditures at ten months post-policy compared to expected rates. For targeted products, there were 2.04% [95%CI: -4.15, 0.07] and 13.26% [95%CI: -16.64, -9.87] relative reductions in prescribing rate and expenditures, respectively, at ten months post-policy. Non-targeted products increased significantly (22% [95%CI: 10.49, 33.51] and 22.85% [95%CI: 11.69, 34.01] relative increases in prescribing rate and expenditures respectively). Larger reimbursement cuts led to greater reductions in prescribing rate, volume, and insurance reimbursement expenditures of targeted products. Prescribing rates of both targeted and non-targeted products by international manufacturers declined after the policy while rates of prescribing non-targeted products by local manufacturers increased. CONCLUSIONS: While total government expenditures for oral antidiabetic medications were contained by the policy, our results indicate that prescribing shifted at the margin from targeted to non-targeted products and from international to local products. Further research is warranted to understand how changes in medication use due to price regulation policies affect medication adherence and patient health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/economía , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Programas Nacionales de Salud/organización & administración , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organización & administración , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estadística & datos numéricos , Taiwán/epidemiología
5.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 36(8): 468-81, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23993755

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to examine the direct costs associated with Medicare's 2005-2007 "Demonstration of Expanded Coverage of Chiropractic Services" (Demonstration) and their drivers, to explore practice pattern variation during the Demonstration, and to describe scenarios of cost implications had provider behavior and benefit coverage been different. METHODS: Using Medicare Part B data from April 1, 2005, and March 31, 2007, and 2004 Rural Urban Continuum Codes, we conducted a retrospective analysis of traditionally reimbursed and expanded chiropractic services provided to patients aged 65 to 99 years who had a neuromusculoskeletal condition. We compared chiropractic care costs, supply, and utilization patterns for the 2-year periods before, during, and after the Demonstration for 5 Chicago area counties that participated in the Demonstration to those for 6 other county aggregations-urban or rural counties that participated in the Demonstration; were designated comparison counties during the Demonstration; or were neither participating nor comparison counties during the Demonstration. RESULTS: When compared with other groups, doctors of chiropractic in 1 region (Chicago area counties) billed more aggressively for expanded services and were reimbursed significantly more for traditionally reimbursed chiropractic services provided before, during, and after the Demonstration. Costs would have been substantially lower had doctors of chiropractic in this 1 region had responded similarly to those in other demonstration counties. CONCLUSION: We found widespread geographic variation in practice behavior and patterns. Our findings suggest that Medicare might reduce the risk of accelerated costs associated with the introduction of a new benefit by applying appropriate limits to the frequency of use and overall costs of those benefits, particularly in highly competitive markets.


Asunto(s)
Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Manipulación Quiropráctica/economía , Medicare/economía , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Manipulación Quiropráctica/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
7.
J Am Osteopath Assoc ; 112(6): 356-65, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22707645

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: The names of certain counterstrain tender points are incongruent with their physical locations because of an assumption that these points are reflective of dysfunction in neighboring body areas. Because the body area that is physically examined does not always match the body region in which somatic dysfunction is diagnosed for these tender points, it is not always clear which evaluation and management service codes should be used for billing physician services. OBJECTIVE: To assess the attitudes of osteopathic physicians toward the billing and coding of incongruent counterstrain tender points. METHODS: Physician members of the American Academy of Osteopathy who use counterstrain in clinical practice were surveyed regarding the body area that they would physically examine when assessing for incongruent tender points and, if tender points were present, the body regions to which they would assign somatic dysfunction for billing and coding purposes. Physician responses were categorized as indicating a structural approach (ie, reflective of anatomic location) or a functional approach (ie, reflective of dysfunction in neighboring body areas) to tender point examination and treatment. Associations between sex, specialty, and years in practice with the approach chosen were also examined. RESULTS: Of 175 physicians who responded to the survey, 156 met the study criteria. Respondents were primarily board-certified in neuromusculoskeletal medicine/osteopathic manipulative medicine (98 [63%]), special proficiency in osteopathic manipulative medicine (30 [19%]), or family practice/family practice and osteopathic manipulative treatment (94 [60%]). Ninety percent of physicians predominantly chose responses indicating a structural approach to the physical examination of tender points and 21% predominantly chose responses indicating a functional approach to somatic dysfunction diagnosis. There were inconsistencies among individual respondents regarding the type of approach chosen for a single tender point. For certain tender points, differences were seen for approach between men and women, specialty, and years in practice. CONCLUSION: Our survey respondents had clear differences in opinion regarding physical examination location and somatic dysfunction diagnosis for incongruent tender points. These results suggest inconsistency among physicians in determining the physical examination component of evaluation and management services and the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, or ICD-9, diagnostic codes in the assessment of these incongruent tender points.


Asunto(s)
Codificación Clínica/economía , Competencia Clínica/economía , Médicos Osteopáticos/economía , Dolor/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Esguinces y Distensiones/economía , Codificación Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Médicos Osteopáticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Sexuales , Estadística como Asunto , Estados Unidos
8.
J Altern Complement Med ; 16(6): 621-6, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20569028

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize the practice of pediatric chiropractic. DESIGN: The study design was a cross-sectional descriptive survey. SETTINGS/LOCATION: The settings were private practices throughout the United States, Canada, and Europe. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were 548 chiropractors, the majority of whom are practicing in the United States, Canada, and Europe. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Practitioner demographics (i.e., gender, years in practice, and chiropractic alma mater), practice characteristics (i.e., patient visits per week, practice income reimbursement), and chiropractic technique were surveyed. The practitioners were also asked to indicate common indicators for pediatric presentation, their practice activities (i.e., use of herbal remedies, exercise and rehabilitation, prayer healing, etc.), and referral patterns. RESULTS: A majority of the responders were female with an average practice experience of 8 years. They attended an average of 133 patient visits per week, with 21% devoted to the care of children (<18 years of age). Practice income was derived primarily from out-of-pocket reimbursement with charges of an average of $127 and $42 for the first and subsequent visits, respectively. These visits were reimbursed to address common conditions of childhood (i.e., asthma, ear infections, etc.). Approach to patient care was spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) augmented with herbal remedies, exercises, rehabilitation, and so on. Wellness care also figured prominently as a motivator for chiropractic care. Fifty-eight percent (58%) indicated an established relationship with an osteopathic or medical physician. Eighty percent (80%) of the responders indicated referring patients to medical practitioners while only 29% indicated receiving a referral from a medical/osteopathic physician. CONCLUSIONS: The chiropractic care of children is a significant aspect of the practice of chiropractic. Further research is warranted to examine the safety and effectiveness of this popular nonallopathic approach to children's health.


Asunto(s)
Quiropráctica/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatría/métodos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Preventiva , Adolescente , Canadá , Niño , Quiropráctica/economía , Estudios Transversales , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Manipulación Espinal/estadística & datos numéricos , Visita a Consultorio Médico/economía , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Osteopáticos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
9.
Psychiatr Prax ; 32(3): 153-4, 2005 Apr.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15818523
10.
Health Econ ; 14(6): 575-93, 2005 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15497188

RESUMEN

We compare the more common physician compensation method of fee-for-service to the less common payment-for-outcomes method. This paper combines an investigation of the theoretical properties of both of these payment regimes with a unique data set from rural Cameroon in which patients can choose between outcome and service based payments. We show that consideration of the role of patient effort in the production of health leads to important differences in the performance of these contracts. Theory and empirical evidence show that when illnesses require (or are responsive to) large amounts of both patient and practitioner effort, outcome based payment schemes are superior to effort based schemes. The traditional healer--a practitioner who offers health services on an outcome-contingent basis--is advanced as an important example of how patient effort can be better understood and tapped in health care.


Asunto(s)
Medicinas Tradicionales Africanas , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Médicos/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estadística & datos numéricos , Camerún , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organización & administración , Población Rural
11.
Med J Aust ; 181(2): 100-4, 2004 Jul 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15257650

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine relations between consultation length and content, and general practitioner choice of claiming level B or C when billing consultations > 20 minutes through Medicare. DESIGN AND SETTING: A secondary analysis from a cross-sectional national general practice survey (1 April 2000 to 31 March 2003) of 101 112 consultations with 2811 GPs, comparing level B consultations 20 minutes (claimed as level B or C), and consultations > 20 minutes claimed as level C with those claimed as level B. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Consultation length, encounter, patient characteristics; number, type of problems managed; type and frequency of treatments provided in relation to consultation level charged. RESULTS: There were 80 476 level B consultations 20 minutes claimed as level B or C (5725 [38.4%] level B; 9168 [61.5%] level C). Longer level B+C consultations differed from shorter level B consultations in patient sex, Department of Veterans' Affairs card status, and new-patient status, and involved more reasons for encounter, problems managed, chronic problems, clinical treatments, therapeutic procedures, referrals and pathology and imaging orders. Longer consultations claimed as level C were significantly longer (0.9 minutes) than those claimed as level B and involved more reasons for encounter, problems managed (particularly new, chronic, psychosocial and gynaecological) and more clinical treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Patient characteristics and consultation content differ at longer consultations. Consultations charged as level C are more complex than those charged as level B. GPs use both time and content when choosing item number, rather than relying only on specified time thresholds. This has implications for future restructuring of MBS attendance items.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/economía , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Estudios Transversales , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/organización & administración , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Visita a Consultorio Médico/economía , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Tiempo y Movimiento
12.
J Clin Oncol ; 22(10): 2008-14, 2004 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15143094

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Inpatient palliative care units are unavailable in most cancer centers and tertiary hospitals. The purpose of this article is to review the outcomes of the first 344 admissions to the Palliative Care Inpatient Service (PCIS) at our comprehensive cancer center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our computerized database for clinical and demographic information, length of stay, and hospital billing during the first year of the service's operation. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty patients were admitted during the study period. Their median age was 57 years. The main cancer diagnoses were thoracic or head and neck (44%), gastrointestinal (25%), and hematologic malignancy (8%). The main referral symptoms were pain (44%), nausea (41%), fatigue (39%), and dyspnea (38%). The median length of stay in the PCIS was 7 days (range, 1 to 58 days). Fifty-nine patients died while in the PCIS. However, the overall hospital mortality rate was not increased compared with that in the year before the establishment of the PCIS (3.58% v 3.59%). The mean reimbursement rate for all palliative care charges was approximately 57%, and the mean daily charges in the PCIS were 38% lower than the mean daily charges for the rest of the hospital. Symptom intensity data showed severe distress on admission and significant improvement in the main target symptoms. Most patients were discharged to a hospice. CONCLUSION: The PCIS has been accepted in our tertiary cancer center on the basis of its clinical utility and financial viability.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Instituciones Oncológicas/economía , Instituciones Oncológicas/organización & administración , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales Universitarios/economía , Hospitales Universitarios/organización & administración , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/clasificación , Neoplasias/economía , Cuidados Paliativos/economía , Cuidados Paliativos/organización & administración , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Texas
13.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 134(11): 1509-15, 2003 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14664272

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2000, Michigan's Medicaid dental program initiated Healthy Kids Dental, or HKD, a demonstration program offering dental coverage to Medicaid-enrolled children in selected counties. The program was administered through a private dental carrier at private reimbursement levels. The authors undertook a study to determine the effect of these changes. METHODS: The authors obtained enrollment and utilization data for four groups: children covered in the first 12 months of HKD in 22 counties, children with private dental coverage in the same 22 counties in the same 12 months, Medicaid-enrolled children in the same 22 counties for 12 prior months, and Medicaid-enrolled children in 46 counties who were not included in the HKD program at any time. The authors compared access to care, dentists' participation, treatment patterns, patient travel distances and program cost. RESULTS: Under HKD, dental care utilization increased 31.4 percent overall and 39 percent among children continuously enrolled for 12 months, compared with the previous year under Medicaid. Dentists' participation increased substantially, and the distance traveled by patients for appointments was cut in half. Costs were 2.5 times higher, attributable to more children's receiving care, the mix of services shifting to more comprehensive care and payment at customary reimbursement levels. CONCLUSIONS: By increasing reimbursement levels and streamlining administration, the HKD demonstration program has shown that substantial improvements can be made to dental access for the Medicaid-enrolled population. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The findings of this assessment suggest that appropriate attention to administration and payment levels can rapidly improve access for Medicaid-enrolled patients using existing dental personnel. By cooperating with state officials to design a program that addresses multiple issues, dental providers can help create a Medicaid dental program that is attractive to both providers and patients.


Asunto(s)
Atención Dental para Niños , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Medicaid , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Atención Odontológica Integral/economía , Atención Odontológica Integral/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dental para Niños/economía , Atención Dental para Niños/estadística & datos numéricos , Odontólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Seguro Odontológico/estadística & datos numéricos , Michigan , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estadística & datos numéricos , Transportes/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
14.
Health Policy ; 24(3): 203-12, 1993 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10128125

RESUMEN

The paper examines the nature and use of GP remuneration systems as instruments of health policy in five different countries--Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway and the UK. Since doctors are not naturally efficient, they need to be encouraged to adopt efficient practices. The paper indicates that while there are great differences in the nature and level of remuneration across the five countries, there is little evidence that policy-makers in these countries have given adequate thought to how to use remuneration to influence the activities of GPs. In all five countries except the UK the objectives of GP services are somewhat vague and largely non-operational. The designs of the remuneration systems seem directed more towards deciding doctors' income levels and controlling public expenditure than towards meeting health care objectives. The remuneration for similar services varies widely across the five study countries. There is a need to clarify what the objectives of general practice are and thereafter to experiment more with GP remuneration systems to determine how best to get doctors to meet these objectives efficiently.


Asunto(s)
Política de Salud/economía , Seguro de Servicios Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos de Familia/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estadística & datos numéricos , Australia , Canadá , Capitación , Dinamarca , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/economía , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/organización & administración , Honorarios Médicos , Seguro de Servicios Médicos/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Noruega , Médicos de Familia/organización & administración , Médicos de Familia/estadística & datos numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organización & administración , Salarios y Beneficios , Reino Unido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA