Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 60
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Curr Hematol Malig Rep ; 15(4): 241-247, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32533390

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The Choosing Wisely® initiative, led by the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation in collaboration with national professional medical societies, aims to help patients choose care that is essential, free from harm, and evidence-based. The American Society of Hematology has advocated practices specific to hematology for physicians and patients to examine carefully. Here, we summarize various barriers to adopting these practices, interventions used to improve adoption, and challenges in measuring the effectiveness of these interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: The Choosing Wisely® campaign has become an international effort with more than 20 countries worldwide having embraced it. Such widespread interest indicates that the campaign initiated an important dialog between patients and physicians about overutilization of resources. Evidence showing the positive impact of interventions on adopting these practices is accumulating, but their effect on improving clinical outcomes is uncertain. Decreasing overuse of resources is a cultural change in perspective for practitioners and patients alike. We believe that healthcare delivery is transitioning from being volume-based to value-based. As we continue to support the Choosing Wisely® campaign, we need to implement strategies to document and measure the influence of our value-based recommendations on physician practices, patient care and attitudes, and healthcare costs.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Promoción de la Salud/normas , Hematología/normas , Participación del Paciente , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Conducta de Elección , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hematología/economía , Humanos , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Seguridad del Paciente/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Seguro de Salud Basado en Valor
2.
J Surg Res ; 241: 285-293, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31048219

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Palliative care can improve end-of-life care and reduce health care expenditures, but the optimal timing for initiation remains unclear. We sought to characterize the association between timing of palliative care, in-hospital deaths, and health care costs. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including all patients who were diagnosed and died of colorectal cancer between 2004 and 2012 in Manitoba, Canada. The primary exposure was timing of palliative care, defined as no involvement, late involvement (less than 14 d before death), early involvement (14 to 60 d before death), and very early involvement (>60 d before death). The primary outcome was in-hospital deaths and end-of-life health care costs. RESULTS: A total of 1607 patients were included; 315 (20%) received palliative care and 162 (10%) died in hospital. Compared to those who did not receive palliative care, patients with early and very early involvement experienced significantly decreased odds of dying in hospital (OR 0.21 95% CI 0.06-0.69 P = 0.01 and OR 0.11 95% CI 0.01-0.78 P = 0.03, respectively) and significantly lower health care costs. There were no significant differences in in-hospital deaths and health care costs between patients without palliative care and those who received late palliative care. CONCLUSIONS: Early palliative care involvement is associated with decreased odds of dying in hospital and lower health care utilization and costs in patients with colorectal cancer. These findings provide real-world evidence supporting early integration of palliative care, although the optimal timing (early versus very early) remains a matter of debate.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/economía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Oncología Médica/economía , Oncología Médica/métodos , Oncología Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Paliativos/economía , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cuidado Terminal/economía , Cuidado Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Matern Child Nutr ; 14(1)2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28626878

RESUMEN

Adequate calcium intake during pregnancy is important in the prevention of pre-eclampsia. A substantial proportion of pregnant women do not meet the recommended daily calcium intake, even in developed countries. Nonetheless, calcium supplementation is not routinely advised to pregnant women in most countries. We aimed to predict the impact of advising pregnant women to use calcium supplements (1,000 mg/day) on the number of cases of pre-eclampsia prevented and related health care costs. By use of a decision-analytic model, we assessed the expected impact of advising calcium supplementation to either (1) all pregnant women, (2) women at high risk of developing pre-eclampsia, or (3) women with a low dietary calcium intake compared with current care. Calculations were performed for a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 pregnant women living in a high-income country, although input parameters of the model can be adjusted so as to fit other settings. The incidence of pre-eclampsia could be reduced by 25%, 8%, or 13% when advising calcium supplementation to all pregnant women, women at high risk of pre-eclampsia, or women with a low dietary calcium intake, respectively. Expected net financial benefits of the three scenarios were of €4,621,465, €2,059,165, or €2,822,115 per 100,000 pregnant women, respectively. Advising pregnant women to use calcium supplements can be expected to cause substantial reductions in the incidence of pre-eclampsia as well as related health care costs. It appears most efficient to advise calcium supplementation to all pregnant women, not subgroups only.


Asunto(s)
Calcio de la Dieta/uso terapéutico , Suplementos Dietéticos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Fenómenos Fisiologicos Nutricionales Maternos , Modelos Económicos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Preeclampsia/prevención & control , Adulto , Calcio/deficiencia , Calcio de la Dieta/efectos adversos , Calcio de la Dieta/economía , Terapia Combinada/economía , Ahorro de Costo , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Enfermedades Carenciales/economía , Enfermedades Carenciales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Carenciales/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Carenciales/prevención & control , Países Desarrollados , Suplementos Dietéticos/efectos adversos , Suplementos Dietéticos/economía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/economía , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Incidencia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/economía , Preeclampsia/economía , Preeclampsia/etiología , Preeclampsia/terapia , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/fisiopatología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Riesgo
4.
Acta Biomed ; 88(2): 143-150, 2017 08 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28845827

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The current lack of scientific validation of non-conventional treatments in medicine, whose epistemological foundations lie in scientific evidence and experimentation, raises significant questions regarding the costs and benefits of alternative-treatment forms. Nonetheless, in the last few decades non-conventional treatments have been increasingly recognised by the Italian medical profession, with one regional healthcare administration adopting some non-conventional practices as part of its conventional healthcare services. AIMS: The Authors aim to analyse non-conventional treatments in medicine from an epistemological, cultural, ethical, political and economic point of view, in order to highlight criticalities and incongruities, especially when these treatments are approved by a public healthcare system, which should be grounded on the "evidence-based medicine" principle. CONCLUSIONS: Non-conventional treatments in medicine are constituted by meta-theories, i.e. philosophical, religious and ideological concepts that conflict with contemporary rational, empirical medicine. In the interest of patients and society, the paper stresses the incongruity of a healthcare system which, despite being grounded on the "evidence-based medicine" principle, allows the development of non conventional treatments. Having said that, medical science should address not only the biological domain of illness but also its existential implications. Awareness and respect for the individual experience can undoubtedly lead to a new medical model that allows for a more effective therapeutic intervention.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias/ética , Análisis Ético , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/ética , Terapias Complementarias/economía , Terapias Complementarias/educación , Cultura , Atención a la Salud , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/economía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/educación , Humanos , Política
8.
Am J Prev Med ; 47(2): 115-22, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24951038

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Value-based insurance designs (VBD) incorporate evidence-based medicine into health benefit design. Consumer knowledge of new VBD benefits is important to assessing their impact on health care use. PURPOSE: To assess knowledge of features of a VBD. METHODS: The eligible study population was employees receiving healthcare benefits in an integrated care system in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. In 2010, participants completed a web-based survey 2 months after rollout of the plan, including three true/false questions about benefit design features including copays for preventive care visits and chronic disease medications and premium costs. Analysis was completed in 2012. Knowledgeable was defined as correct response to all three questions; self-reported knowledge was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 3,463 people completed the survey (response rate=71.7%). The majority of respondents were female (80.1%) Caucasians (79.6%) aged 35-64 years (79.0%), reflecting the overall employee population. A total of 45.7% had at least a 4-year college education, and 69.1% were married. About three quarters of respondents correctly answered each individual question; half (52.1%) of respondents answered all three questions correctly. On multivariate analysis, knowledge was independently associated with female gender (OR=1.80, 95% CI=1.40, 2.31); Caucasian race (OR=1.72, 95% CI=1.28, 2.32); increasing household income (OR for ≥$100,000=1.86, 95% CI=1.29, 2.68); nonunion job status (OR compared to union status=1.63, 95% CI=1.17, 2.26); and high satisfaction with the health plan (OR compared to low satisfaction=1.26; 95% CI=1.00, 1.57). CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete knowledge of benefits is prevalent in an employee population soon after VBD rollout.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/economía , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/economía , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Compra Basada en Calidad/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Recolección de Datos , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Noroeste de Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
9.
Ann Fam Med ; 12(2): 172-5, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24615314

RESUMEN

Because a high percentage of primary care patients have behavioral problems, patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) that wish to attain true comprehensive whole-person care will find ways to integrate behavioral health services into their structure. Yet in today's health care environment, the incorporation of behavioral services into primary care is exceptional rather than usual practice. In this article, we discuss the components considered necessary to provide sustainable, value-added integrated behavioral health care in the PCMH. These components are to: (1) combine medical and behavioral benefits into one payment pool; (2) target complex patients for priority behavioral health care; (3) use proactive onsite behavioral "teams;" (4) match behavioral professional expertise to the need for treatment escalation inherent in stepped care; (5) define, measure, and systematically pursue desired outcomes; (6) apply evidence-based behavioral treatments; and (7) use cross-disciplinary care managers in assisting the most complicated and vulnerable. By adopting these 7 components, PCHMs will augment their ability to achieve improved health in their patients at lower cost in a setting that enhances ease of access to commonly needed services.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/economía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/economía , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Estados Unidos
11.
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) ; 29: 1-9, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24171232

RESUMEN

Since 2011, Germany's Pharmaceutical Market Restructuring Act has mandated that all newly introduced drugs are subject to an assessment of their benefits in relation to a comparator, typically the current standard treatment. For drugs found to have some additional benefit, the manufacturer and the statutory health insurers negotiate a price. For drugs found to have no additional benefit, their price is set in reference to the price of the comparator. This new system is intended to reduce spending on expensive new drugs that are no more effective than existing treatments, while encouraging pharmaceutical companies to invest in innovative drugs that improve health outcomes. The German experience provides lessons for the United States, where comparative effectiveness research is publicly funded but public insurance programs are limited in their ability to use its findings to make coverage or pricing decisions.


Asunto(s)
Costos de los Medicamentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Industria Farmacéutica/economía , Economía Farmacéutica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/economía , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/economía , Formulación de Políticas , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Alemania , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Estados Unidos
12.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes ; 107(7): 461-7, 2013.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24238023

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Until AMNOG came into effect Germany had free pricing of new drugs. Our exemplary work investigates the costs of new drugs that were licensed in the two years prior to AMNOG, and compares them to the costs of standard treatment that has been used in pivotal trials. Also, the important components of pharmaceutical prices will be illustrated. METHOD: We retrospectively analysed the European Public Assessment Reports of proprietary medicinal products that the European Medicinal Agency initially approved in 2009 and 2010 and that were tested against an active control in at least one pivotal trial. RESULTS: If the standard treatment was a generic, the average pharmacy retail price of new drugs was 7.4 times (median 7.1) higher than that of standard treatment. If the standard treatment was an originator drug the average price was 1.4 times (median 1.2) higher than that of the new drug. There was no clear correlation of an increase in costs for new drugs and their "grade of innovation" as rated according to the criteria of Fricke. Our study shows that prices of new drugs must be linked to the evidence of comparative benefit; since German drug pricing is complex, cost saving effects obtained thereby will depend on a range of other rules and decisions.


Asunto(s)
Aprobación de Drogas/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos/tendencias , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Drogas en Investigación/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/economía , Ahorro de Costo/economía , Ahorro de Costo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aprobación de Drogas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Costos de los Medicamentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/economía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Alemania , Humanos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia
13.
Z Gastroenterol ; 51(3): 278-86, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23299901

RESUMEN

The introduction of the G-DRG reimbursement system has greatly increased the pressure to provide cost effective treatment in German hospitals. Reimbursement based on diagnosis-related groups, which requires stratification of costs incurred is still not sufficiently discriminating the disease severity and severity in relation to the intensive costs in gastroenterology. In a combined retrospective and prospective study at a tertial referral centre we investigated whether this also applies for decompensated liver cirrhosis. In 2006, 64 retrospective cases (age 57 ± 12.9; ♂ 69.2 %, ♀ 29.8 %) with decompensated liver cirrhosis (ICD code K76.4) were evaluated for their length of hospitalisation, reimbursement as well as Child and MELD scores. In 2008, 74 cases with decompensated liver cirrhosis were treated in a prospective study according to a standardised and evidence-based clinical pathway (age 57 ± 12.2; 73 % ♂, ♀ 27 %). Besides a trend in the reduction of length of hospital stay (retrospective: 13.6 ± 8.6, prospective 13.0 ± 7.2, p = 0.85) overall revenues from patients treated according to a evidence-based clinical pathway were lower than the calculated costs from the InEK matrix. Costs of medication as a percentage of reimbursement amount increased with increasing severity. In both years we could demonstrate an inverse correlation between daily reimbursement and disease severity which precluded cost coverage. For the cost-covering hospital treatment of patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis an adjustment of the DRG based on clinical severity scores such as Child-Pugh or MELD is warranted, if evidence-based treatment standards are to be kept.


Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas/economía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Cirrosis Hepática/economía , Cirrosis Hepática/terapia , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirrosis Hepática/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo
14.
MMW Fortschr Med ; 155 Suppl 2: 51-5, 2013 Jul 25.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24930322

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Today numerous products for wound care are available. A research-based evidence on which the clinician can base its selection, is still missing. In the guidelines randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been left out. METHOD: In the overview three current RCT with products for the treatment of chronically venous ulcers will be presented. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The pre-mentioned studies show, that it is possible to provide a basis for evidence-based treatment in wound healing. The effective value ofa wound treatment based on the costs and benefits must be defined by the health system. But products, for which data from randomized trials exist, should be evaluated in a different way to products, for which there are no such data.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Úlcera Varicosa/terapia , Biomarcadores , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/economía , Humanos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Úlcera Varicosa/economía , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología
15.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 137(9): 1247-54, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23216247

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Early diagnosis of gram-negative bloodstream infections, prompt identification of the infecting organism, and appropriate antibiotic therapy improve patient care outcomes and decrease health care expenditures. In an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance, methods to acquire and rapidly translate critical results into timely therapies for gram-negative bloodstream infections are needed. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether mass spectrometry technology coupled with antimicrobial stewardship provides a substantially improved alternative to conventional laboratory methods. DESIGN: An evidence-based intervention that integrated matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and near-real-time antimicrobial stewardship practices was implemented. Outcomes in patients hospitalized prior to initiation of the study intervention were compared to those in patients treated after implementation. Differences in length of hospitalization and hospital costs were assessed in survivors. RESULTS: The mean hospital length of stay in the preintervention group survivors (n = 100) was 11.9 versus 9.3 days in the intervention group (n = 101; P = .01). After multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with decreased length of hospitalization included the intervention (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.88) and active therapy at 48 hours (hazard ratio, 2.9; confidence interval, 1.15-7.33). Mean hospital costs per patient were $45 709 in the preintervention group and $26 162 in the intervention group (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Integration of rapid identification and susceptibility techniques with antimicrobial stewardship significantly improved time to optimal therapy, and it decreased hospital length of stay and total costs. This innovative strategy has ramifications for other areas of patient care.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/economía , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/economía , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiinfecciosos/economía , Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Intervención Médica Temprana/economía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/economía , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción/economía , Texas , Factores de Tiempo
17.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 21(10): 1102-11, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22855275

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The socioeconomic determinants for drug utilization, especially in children, have not been investigated sufficiently so far. The study's aim was the estimation of prevalences and determinants of conventional, homeopathic and phytotherapeutic drugs and expenditures. METHODS: Population-based data on drug utilization of 3,642 children in two German birth cohorts (GINIplus and LISAplus, 10-year follow-up) were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. For analysis, the reported drugs (use within the last four weeks) were classified into the therapeutic categories of 'conventional medicine', 'homeopathy', 'phytotherapy' and 'others'. Drug costs were estimated using pharmaceutical identification numbers. RESULTS: In all, 42.3% of the children reported drug use; 24.1% of the drugs were homeopathic and 11.5% were phytotherapeutic. The proportion of children who took at least one homeopathic remedy was 14.3%. Drugs prescribed by physicians were dominated by conventional medicine (76.5%), whereas in non-prescribed drugs, both homeopathy and conventional medicine accounted for 37% each. Boys (OR = 0.78) used less homeopathy than girls. Income showed only a weak influence. Education had a strong effect on the use of phytotherapy such that children of mothers with higher school education (>10 years vs. <10 years) used more phytotherapy (OR = 2.01). If out-of-pocket payments arose (n = 613), the mean was €20. On average, total drug expenditures summed up to €39 in 4 weeks for drug users if only clearly identifiable prices for drugs were considered (58% of all data). CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of homeopathy is common in children from the analyzed cohort. User profiles of homeopathy and phytotherapy differ from each other and should be analyzed separately.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Homeopatía/economía , Homeopatía/tendencias , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/economía , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Atención a la Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/economía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/tendencias , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Servicios Farmacéuticos/economía , Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos
19.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 21(7): 530-4, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22819544
20.
Am J Public Health ; 102(9): e15-8, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22813477

RESUMEN

I have explored the debates on evidence-based oral health promotion and examined the practicality of promoting oral health care within a whole system (social, cultural, and environmental) approach. The use of evidence-based decision-making in health services and planning is a viable mechanism to identify optimal health benefits; however, barriers to the effective adoption of evidence-based health practice, including barriers that apply to oral health promotion, have been identified. Evidence-based oral health promotion highlights the importance of examining health promotion activities within a defined social context-a departure from the focus on improving study designs and research methods. Thus, the basis for evidence in health activities is grounded in social and organizational systems. This could contribute to sustainable health efforts.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Salud Bucal/normas , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/economía , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Participación Social
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA