2019 United States Osteopathic Medical Regulatory Summit: Consensus, Recommendations, and Next Steps in Defining Osteopathic Distinctiveness.

BACKGROUND: Osteopathic distinctiveness is a result of professional education, identity formation, training, credentialing, and qualifications. With the advancement of a single graduate medical education (GME) accreditation system and the continued growth of the osteopathic medical profession, osteopathic distinctiveness and professional identity are seen as lacking clarity and pose a challenge. SUMMIT: To achieve consensus on a succinct definition of osteopathic distinctiveness and to identify steps to more clearly define and advance that distinctiveness, particularly in professional self-regulation, a representative group of osteopathic medical students, residents, physicians, and members of the licensing, GME, and undergraduate medical education (UME) communities convened the 2019 United States Osteopathic Medical Regulatory Summit in February 2019. Key features of osteopathic distinctiveness were discussed. Growth in the profession; changes in health care delivery, technology, and demographics within the profession and patient communities; and associated challenges and opportunities for osteopathic medical practice and patients were considered. CONSENSUS: Osteopathic medicine is a distinctive practice that brings unique, added value to patients, the public, and the health care community at large. A universal definition and common understanding of that distinctiveness is lacking. Efforts to unify messaging that defines osteopathic distinctiveness, to align the distinctive elements of osteopathic medical education and professional self-regulation across a continuum, and to advance research on care and educational program outcomes are critical to the future of the osteopathic medical profession. RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) Convene a task force of groups represented at the Summit to develop a succinct and consistent message defining osteopathic distinctiveness. (2) Demonstrate uniqueness of the profession through research demonstrating efficacy of care and patient outcomes, adding to the public good. (3) Harmonize GME and UME by beginning to align entrustable professional activities with UME milestones. (4) Convene representatives from osteopathic specialty colleges and certification boards to define curricular elements across GME, certification, and osteopathic continuous certification. (5) Build on the Project in Osteopathic Medical Education and Empathy study.

Who Uses Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment? A Prospective, Observational Study Conducted by DO-Touch.NET.

CONTEXT: Information about the characteristics of patients who use osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine the scope of conditions being managed with OMT and describe the characteristics of patients who receive OMT. METHODS: Researchers conducted a longitudinal, observational study on the use and effectiveness of OMT at 17 clinics where clinicians (ie, osteopathic and allopathic physicians and Canadian-trained osteopaths) provided OMT. Adult patients receiving OMT completed questionnaires immediately before, immediately after, and daily for 7 days after treatment. Data collected from patients included demographic information, chief complaint(s) and their severity, and health-related quality of life. Physical examination findings, treatment, and medical diagnosis documentation were extracted from medical records. Census data were used to assess whether patients were representative of the population of the county where the clinic was located. RESULTS: Data were collected from 927 patients at 1924 office visits. A majority of patients were women (690 [75%]), white (854 [96%]), and not Hispanic or Latinx (707 [95%]). The mean (SD) age was 51.9 (15.9) years. When compared with census data, the sample had higher percentages of women, people aged 65 years and older, people who identified as white, people who were high school and college graduates, and people with higher household incomes than that of the county population. The most common chief complaints from patients were pain or discomfort in the lower back (311 [34%]) and neck (277 [30%]), which corresponded with the most common medical diagnoses. Patients reported that OMT, surgery, and medications were the most helpful treatments they had used previously for their chief complaint(s). Before receiving OMT, patients' health-related quality of life was significantly worse (P≤.05) than that of the general US population. CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients receiving OMT are being treated primarily for musculoskeletal pain conditions, are not representative of the population of the county where the clinic was located, and have worse health-related quality of life than that of the general population. Information about the characteristics of patients who use OMT is important for defining osteopathic distinctiveness and identifying potential areas for increasing the use of OMT. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02395965).

The patient experience of osteopathic healthcare.

BACKGROUND: Osteopathy in Australia is a primary care limited scope practice. Practitioner surveys suggest that patients present with chronic pain and receive manual therapies, exercise and lifestyle advice. Further research is required to deepen the understanding of this intervention from the perspective of patients. OBJECTIVE: To explore the experience of patients receiving osteopathic healthcare. DESIGN: Mixed methodology. METHOD: A quantitative survey of a convenience sample of patients was followed by qualitative semi-structured interviews in a purposive sample of respondents with chronic non-specific low back pain. The transcripts were analysed using a phenomenological approach. RESULTS: The survey results suggested directions of enquiry for the interviews. Eleven subjects were interviewed and reported commonalities in their clinical histories with multisystem co-morbidities. Four themes became apparent: patient decision-making, patient shared experiences of the osteopathic healthcare consultation, tailored patient-centred care, and therapeutic relationship in healthcare. CONCLUSION: This data suggests that patients experience osteopathic healthcare after trying other disciplines; that there are shared aspects of the consultations, with a thorough assessment, education about their condition, multiple manual therapies and lifestyle advice; that the experience is patient-centred and tailored to their context; and that the therapeutic relationship is a key aspect of the experience. These results reflect a number of aspects of osteopathic healthcare from workplace surveys.

Técnica de Snap en el tratamiento del hombro doloroso / No disponible

Introducción: El dolor de hombro es un problema importante tanto médico como socioeconómico en la sociedad occidental, debido a la cantidad de bajas laborales e incapacidades que ocasiona. La osteopatía se presenta como un tratamiento efectivo en estos casos, pudiendo objetivarse los resultados con métodos fiables como la ecografía. Material Y Métodos: Estudio observacional de serie de casos clínicos. Se describen tres casos que han sido tratados de hombro doloroso, incluyendo en el tratamiento la manipulación de la articulación acromioclavicular. Resultados: En todos los casos se ha corregido la disfunción de la articulación acromioclavicular. La movilidad y el dolor ha mejorado, si bien en uno de los casos los datos ecográficos no han sido concluyentes. Conclusiones: Es necesaria una investigación rigurosa y sistemática sobre este tema para realizar aportaciones con precisión, acerca de la efectividad de la inclusión de esta técnica en el protocolo de tratamiento del hombro doloroso, así como la objetivación de los datos mediante ecografía (AU)

No disponible

Leveraging the principles of osteopathic medicine to improve diabetes outcomes within a new era of health care reform.

First introduced conceptually decades before the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) has evolved as a foundational element within the larger health care system or medical neighborhood, highlighting a coordinated and comprehensive disease management approach centered on intensive primary care interventions. More recently, in the wake of health care reform, accountable care organizations (ACOs) have been established to help health plans, physicians, hospitals, home health care practitioners, and other health care providers better coordinate care through an incentive-based payment arrangement. Osteopathic medicine is poised to proactively capitalize on these emerging health care models, with the anticipated end result of improved quality of care and reduced health care costs. As such, osteopathic physicians involved in the prevention and care of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus need to identify models, best practices, and solutions to advance the medical neighborhood.

Relaciones entre la patología suboccipital y los trastornos temporomandibulares en el tratamiento osteopático / No disponible

Objetivos: Explicar la relación existente entre las disfunciones a nivel suboccipital y los trastornos temporomandibulares (TTM) que se presentan en la articulación temporomandibular (ATM), así como los cambios que se producen en ambas estructuras tras la aplicación de diferentes técnicas de osteopatía descritas en la bibliografía consultada. Material y métodos: Las bases de datos consultadas para la obtención de artículos y estudios fueron Medline, Cochrane, Teseo y ScienceDirect. Se han incluido aquellos textos que aportaban información relevante dentro del campo de la osteopatía, así como artículos de autores de relevancia para sustentar aún más la revisión, dado el escaso número de estudios que se manejan en la actualidad al respecto. Resultados: En esta revisión encontramos 41 estudios y artículos en referencia a la ATM, de los cuales 12 estudios no tenían grupo control o eran casos clínicos aislados, y fueron descartados, por lo que consideramos a los 29 estudios restantes; de éstos, 9 describen la incidencia de la patología cervical, patología de la ATM y relaciones entre ellas; 8 describen el diagnóstico de los TTM; 9 versan sobre la relación entre el tratamiento con diferentes técnicas del segmento suboccipital y 3 explican las relaciones entre el tratamiento de la región mandibular y sus resultados sobre ella. Conclusiones: Tras el análisis de los artículos seleccionados, encontramos resultados favorables a la aplicación de técnicas suboccipitales en relación a los trastornos temporomandibulares, ya que se han apreciado significaciones estadísticas en los estudios expuestos, lo cual hace considerar a las técnicas de la región suboccipital, como procedimentos de elección para el tratamiento de las disfunciones TTM (AU)

No disponible

Osteopatía en la cefalea tensional y la cervicalgia / Osteopathy for tension-type headache and cervical pains

No disponible

Abordajes terapéuticos no farmacológicos para el tratamiento de la cefalea tensional. Revisión bibliográfica / Non-pharmacological therapeutic approaches for the treatment of tension-type headache. Bibliographic review

Introducción: La cefalea tensional (CT) es la más prevalente dentro de las cefaleas primarias. Representa un impacto económico alto y una repercusión importante en la vida de los pacientes que las sufren y en el sistema público de salud. Objetivos: Conocer el número y fechas de publicación de los estudios realizados en el tratamiento de la CT. Material y Métodos: Se procedió a una búsqueda bibliográfica en PubMed recurriendo al uso de las palabras clave contenidas en dichas publicaciones referidas específicamente a CT y se realizó una búsqueda incluyendo los términos tension-type headache y manual therapy, manipulation therapy, physical therapy, vertebral manipulation, cervical manipulation, osteopathy, osteopathic treatment, osteopathic medicine, osteopathic manipulative treatment, osteopathic manipulative. Se encontraron y analizaron un total de 5 estudios que cumplieron los criterios de selección. Resultados: Los resultados encontrados tras la revisión mostraron que respecto a la cefalea tensional (Tension-type headache) existen 2.506 estudios desde 1947 hasta la actualidad. Los resultados mostraron hasta 15 estudios que comenzaron en 1977 hasta el 2009 cuando se asoció a osteopatía (osteopathy) como concepto general resultaron; con tratamiento osteopático (osteopathic treatment) 14 estudios desde 1993 hasta 2011; con medicina osteopática (osteopathic medicine) resultaron 8 estudios desde 1993 hasta 2009; con tratamiento osteopático manipulativo (osteopathic manipulative treatment) 11 estudios desde 1993 hasta 2009; y con osteopatía manipulativa (osteopathic manipulative) 8 estudios desde 1993 hasta 2011. Conclusiones: Existe escasez de estudios que relacionen la terapia osteopática y la CT. Respecto a la aplicación del tratamiento osteopático, junto y por separado, resulta eficaz, pero es necesario que los estudios tengan mayor calidad metodológica (AU)

Introduction: Tension-type headache (TTH) is the most predominant primary headache. It has a high economic impact and a significant consequence for patients whom suffer from it and for the public health system. Objectives: To know how many studies for treating the TTH were performed and when they were published. Material and methods: A bibliographical search was carried out in PubMed, using keywords included in these publications that strictly refer to TTH. This search included terms such as tension-type headache and manual therapy, manipulation therapy, physical therapy, vertebral manipulation, cervical manipulation, osteopathy, osteopathic treatment, osteopathic medicine, osteopathic manipulative treatment, osteopathic manipulative. Five studies were found and analysed that fulfilled the selection criteria. Results: Results that were found after the review showed that regarding the tension-type headache, there are 2,506 studies since 1947 until now. Results showed until 15 studies that started in 1977 until 2009, when osteopathy was associated as general concept; there were 14 studies of osteopathic treatment since 1993 until 2011; 8 studies of osteopathic medicine since 1993 until 2009; 11 studies of osteopathic manipulative treatment since 1993 until 2009 and 8 studies of osteopathic manipulative since 1993 until 2011. Conclusions: There is a lack of studies that link the osteopathic therapy with the TTH. As for the application of an osteopathic treatment, either singly or in conjunction, it is effective, but it is necessary to have more methodological quality in these studies (AU)

Thanks, but no thanks: how denial of osteopathic service in World War I and World War II shaped the profession.

Osteopathic physicians were denied the same rights and privileges that were granted to allopathic physicians by the US government regarding voluntary and compulsory service in World War I and World War II. Even after changes to the examination process allowed osteopathic physicians to take the examinations required to obtain commission as a physician in the army, osteopathic physicians' service was still rejected. The US government's decision to ban DOs from serving in the war was a blessing in disguise that led to tremendous changes in osteopathic medicine, education, and public acceptance of osteopathic physicians. Using primary documents from military officials, congressional hearings, and archived publications of the American Osteopathic Association, the author recounts the battle osteopathic physicians fought to serve their country during war and the challenges they faced while obtaining both legal and social equality in the eyes of the government and the public.

Manual medicine - osteopathy in France organization - education - fields of expertise.

Manual medicine-osteopathy (MMO) is of keen interest among young doctors, generalists and specialists alike. Through a discerning semiological approach, MMO allows non-pharmaceutical physical treatments to be proposed for many musculoskeletal pathologies. In March 2007, some manual therapies (e.g., osteopathy), until then the exclusive preserve of physicians, were recognized in France as a part of the field of professional expertise of non-physicians. This new opening of the manual medicine profession must make non-physicians and physicians aware of their responsibilities.

The National Osteopathic Research Center at the University of North Texas Health Science Center: inception, growth, and future.

The osteopathic profession has long recognized the need to carry out research in order to improve clinical care. Osteopathic physicians have a particular obligation to carry out research in areas, such as osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM), that are unique to osteopathic medicine. OMM is similar to manual therapy that is performed by other types of practitioners, but it has some distinctive characteristics. Osteopathic doctors also use OMM to treat infectious disease-not just musculoskeletal disorders.In 2001, several osteopathic professional organizations agreed to jointly fund a national osteopathic research center at one of the osteopathic medical colleges. Five osteopathic colleges submitted research proposals in response to a request for applications. The University of North Texas Health Science Center (UNTHSC) was chosen to be the site for the Osteopathic Research Center (ORC) and was funded for four years with $1.1M. Between 2002 and 2007, the ORC received an additional $11M in research support from multiple sources including federal funds. With this support, it has made substantive contributions to science. These include oversight of the recently completed four-year, $1.5M multicenter study on the efficacy of OMM as a treatment for pneumonia in the elderly and a three-year, $1.9M National Institutes of Health-funded developmental research center to perform mechanistic studies of some OMM actions.The authors discuss the long-term costs, benefits, and sustainability of the national ORC at UNTHSC in the contexts of research accomplished, the training of new medical osteopathic researchers, and an effort to develop other successful regional osteopathic research centers.