The Nonclinical Pharmacokinetics and Prediction of Human Pharmacokinetics of SPH3127, a Novel Direct Renin Inhibitor.

BACKGROUND: SPH3127 is a novel direct renin inhibitor designed as an oral drug for the regulation of blood pressure and body fluid homeostasis via the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). This candidate is now being evaluated in a phase I clinical trial in China. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to investigate detailed nonclinical pharmacokinetic data, and to predict human pharmacokinetic parameters. METHODS: In vivo pharmacokinetic studies of SPH3127 were performed to investigate the exposure, absorption, clearance, distribution and metabolism after intravenous and oral administration in rats, beagle dogs and cynomolgus monkeys. The cynomolgus monkey pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics study was conducted to investigate the effect-concentration relationship of SPH3127. Its human pharmacokinetic properties were predicted employing an allometric scaling approach based on non-clinical species data. In vitro studies were also employed in a cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme phenotyping study, an inhibition and induction study, and a Caco-2 cell permeation and metabolites profile analysis. RESULTS: After a single intravenous administration of SPH3127 in rats and monkeys, high clearance and volume of distribution and a short terminal elimination half-life were seen for both species. The oral bioavailability of SPH3127 to rats and monkeys was about 11.5-24.5% and 3.3-11.3%, respectively, with the short peak time, Tmax, ranging from 0.25 to 1.3 h. SPH3127 shows low permeability across Caco-2 cell membranes, and as the substrate of p-gp with apparent efflux characteristics. SPH3127 is mainly distributed in the gastrointestine, liver, kidney, pancreas and lung after oral dose in rats, and which decreased quickly to a 1% peak concentration during 12 h. The plasma protein binding ratio of SPH3127 is low as 11.7-14.8% for all species. Excretion studies in rats suggested that fecal, urine and bile excretion represented about 15% of the intake dose, indicating that SPH3127 undergoes extensive metabolism after oral dosing. Phenotyping data revealed that CYP3A4 was the most active enzyme catalyzing the metabolism of SPH3127. The key metabolites were likely N-hydroxylation (M8-7), mono-oxidation-dehydrogenation (M7-4) and mono-oxidation (M8-1, M8-2), both for in vitro liver microsome incubation of all species and in vivo results in rats. The in vitro CYP inhibition study only found very weak action for CYP3A4 (midazolam 1'-hydroxylation) and CYP3A4 (midazolam 6ß-hydroxylation) with IC50 of 56.8 µM and 41.1 µM, respectively. Monkey pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data showed favorable safety margins when compared with the exposure of the effect dose and that of the monkey NOAEL level. Simple four-species allometric scaling led to predicted human plasma clearance and volume of distribution, and then simulated the oral human plasma concentration-time profile, which are both in good consistency with phase I clinical trial pharmacokinetic data. CONCLUSIONS: SPH 3127 has appropriate pharmacokinetic properties for further clinical exploration.

A clinical and microbiological study on the enantiomers of delmopinol.

Objective The clinical part of this study aimed to investigate whether the racemate of delmopinol [(±)-delmopinol] is equivalent to its two enantiomers [(+)-delmopinol and (-)-delmopinol] with respect to efficiency and to determine and compare their pharmacokinetic properties. The purpose of the pre-clinical part was to elucidate possible differences in antimicrobial efficiency. Materials and methods The compounds were tested clinically in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study comprising three treatment periods of 4 days each. The antimicrobial efficacy of the enantiomers was compared in vitro with respect to planktonic and biofilm bacteria of different species. Results No statistically significant differences in prevention of plaque formation were observed. Except for a somewhat higher systemic exposure in terms of AUC and Cmax indicated for (-)-delmopinol compared to (+)-delmopinol, the pharmacokinetic properties were similar. The most common adverse event was a transient anaesthetic feeling in the mouth. This event was reported with the same frequency for all three test solutions. The enantiomers showed similar antimicrobial effects on planktonic bacteria and their biofilms. Conclusions The enantiomers were found to be equally effective with respect to inhibition of plaque development and only minor differences were observed with respect to their pharmacokinetic properties. No differences could be observed in the adverse events reports. There is, therefore, no reason to use one of the enantiomers of delmopinol instead of the racemate. This was further supported by the antimicrobial tests. It is suggested that the combined action of cationic and neutral delmopinol is important for its effect on biofilms.

Comparison of anti-Xa and dilute Russell viper venom time assays in quantifying drug levels in patients on therapeutic doses of rivaroxaban.

CONTEXT: Rivaroxaban is a new oral anticoagulant that functions as a direct anti-Xa inhibitor. Although routine monitoring is not required, measurement of plasma concentrations may be necessary in certain clinical situations. Routine coagulation assays, such as the prothrombin time and, to a lesser degree, activated partial thromboplastin time, correlate with drug concentration, but because of reagent variability, these methods are not reliable for determining rivaroxaban anticoagulation. OBJECTIVE: To compare different methods and calibrators for measuring rivaroxaban, including the chromogenic anti-Xa assay, which, when calibrated with a rivaroxaban standard, may be more appropriate for determining anticoagulation. DESIGN: We compared measured rivaroxaban concentrations with the same anti-Xa kit but used different calibrators, with different anti-Xa kits but the same calibrators, with antithrombin-supplemented anti-Xa kit versus nonsupplemented kits, and with 2 methods based on rivaroxaban-calibrated, high-phospholipid, dilute Russell viper venom time. Regression and paired t test statistics were used to determine correlation and significant differences among methods and calibrator sources. RESULTS: Although there was strong correlation, statistically significant biases existed among methods that report rivaroxaban levels. A single-source calibrator did not alleviate those differences among methods. High-phospholipid Russell viper venom reagents correlated with rivaroxaban concentration but were not better than chromogenic anti-Xa methods. CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban-calibrated, anti-Xa measurements correlate well, but the clinical significance of the variation with rivaroxaban measurements is uncertain. The antithrombin-supplemented, anti-Xa method should be avoided for measuring rivaroxaban.

Point-of-care coagulation testing for assessment of the pharmacodynamic anticoagulant effect of direct oral anticoagulant.

BACKGROUND: This investigation was carried out with already available point-of-care testing (POCT) systems for coagulation parameters to evaluate the qualitative and semiquantitative determination of the time- and concentration-dependent anticoagulant effects of the direct oral anticoagulants rivaroxaban and dabigatran. METHODS: The whole blood prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and activated clotting time (ACT) were determined using the GEM PCL Plus coagulation system. Whole blood PT was also measured on the CoaguCheck XS instrument. In addition, PT and aPTT values were obtained in citrated plasma using the PT reagent Neoplastin Plus and the STA APTT reagent. Drug concentrations of rivaroxaban and dabigatran were determined with a chromogenic anti-Xa assay and the hemoclot assay, which are reported to have good agreement with liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry measurements. POCT was performed in 27 consecutive patients who received rivaroxaban 10, 15, or 20 mg once daily and in 15 patients receiving dabigatran 110 or 150 mg twice daily. Blood samples were collected predose and 2 hours after observed drug intake at steady state. RESULTS: Two hours after observed rivaroxaban administration, the whole blood PT measured on the GEM PCL Plus was prolonged by an average of 64.5% in comparison with predose levels. Less differentiation was observed for rivaroxaban when the PT was measured on the CoaguCheck XS instrument or in plasma (prolongation of 24.1% and 36.8%, respectively). After 2 hours observed dabigatran administration, the whole blood aPTT was comparable with plasma values and was prolonged by 23.5% in comparison with trough values. Significant concentration-dependent prolongations of the activated clotting time were observed to different extents for both direct anticoagulants. CONCLUSIONS: Direct oral anticoagulants display variable ex vivo effects on different POCT-assays. POCT for aPTT is sensitive to increased concentrations of dabigatran, whereas the PT-POCT assessed with test systems such as the GEM PCL Plus may be helpful to measure the pharmacodynamic anticoagulant effects of rivaroxaban in emergency clinical situations.

Performance of coagulation tests in patients on therapeutic doses of rivaroxaban. A cross-sectional pharmacodynamic study based on peak and trough plasma levels.

Knowledge of anticoagulation status during rivaroxaban therapy is desirable in certain clinical situations. It was the study objective to determine coagulation tests most useful for assessing rivaroxaban's anticoagulant effect. Peak and trough blood samples from 29 patients taking rivaroxaban 20 mg daily were collected. Mass spectrometry and various coagulation assays were performed. "On-therapy range" was defined as the rivaroxaban concentrations determined by LC-MS/MS. A "misprediction percentage" was calculated based on how often results of each coagulation assay were in the normal reference range, while the rivaroxaban concentration was in the "on-therapy" range. The on-therapy range was 8.9-660 ng/ml. The misprediction percentages for prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), using multiple reagents and coagulometers, ranged from 10%-52% and 31%-59%, respectively. PT, aPTT and activated clotting time (ACT) were insensitive to trough rivaroxaban: 59%, 62%, and 80% of samples had a normal result, respectively. Over 95% of PT and ACT values were elevated at peak. Four different rivaroxaban calibrated anti-Xa assays had R² values >0.98, demonstrating strong correlations with rivaroxaban drug levels. In conclusion, PT, aPTT and ACT are often normal in patients on therapeutic doses of rivaroxaban. However, PT and ACT may have clinical utility at higher drug plasma levels. Rivaroxaban calibrated anti-factor Xa assays can accurately identify low and high on-therapy rivaroxaban drug levels and, therefore, have superior utility in all clinical situations where assessment of anticoagulation status may be beneficial.

Comparison of calibrated chromogenic anti-Xa assay and PT tests with LC-MS/MS for the therapeutic monitoring of patients treated with rivaroxaban.

Possibilities to monitor rivaroxaban therapy could be useful in certain circumstances. Prothrombin time (PT) or chromogenic anti-Xa assays such as the Biophen Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor® (DiXaI) have been proposed to estimate rivaroxaban concentrations but are mainly based on in vitro studies. The study aim was to compare PT and Biophen DiXaI® measurements with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) measurements in plasma samples from patients treated with Xarelto®. Fifty-two plasma samples were included. PT was performed using Innovin® and Triniclot PT Excel S®. Biophen DiXaI® was performed according to instructions from the manufacturer. The rivaroxaban plasma concentration ranged between 0 and 485 ng/ml as measured by LC-MS/MS. The limits of quantification were 30 ng/ml and 5 ng/ml for Biophen DiXaI® and LC-MS/MS, respectively. The linear correlation between Biophen DiXaI® and LC-MS/MS analyses was high for all rivaroxaban concentrations (r² = 0.95). For concentrations ≤100 ng/ml, r²-value was 0.83. The Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of -16 ng/ml (SD: 25 ng/ml). The PT methods did not correlate well with plasma concentrations measured by LC-MS/MS (r² ≈ 0.60). In conclusion, the important inter-individual variability and the poor correlation with LC-MS/MS preclude the use of PT to estimate rivaroxaban concentrations. Thanks to its small inter-individual variability and good agreement with LC-MS/MS measurements, we recommend the use of Biophen DiXaI® assays to estimate concentrations of rivaroxaban >30 ng/ml. Quantification of low rivaroxaban levels (<30 ng/ml) requires the LC-MS/MS method.

Measurement of dabigatran and rivaroxaban in primary prevention of venous thromboembolism in 106 patients, who have undergone major orthopedic surgery: an observational study.

No routine coagulation laboratory test is recommended during rivaroxaban or dabigatran treatment. However measuring drug concentration and/or anticoagulant activity can be desirable in some special clinical settings, such as bleeding, thrombosis recurrence or emergency surgery. The effects of dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban on various coagulation assays have been previously studied in normal plasma spiked with increasing concentrations of the drug. In contrast, few data are available in routinely treated patients. In order to perform and to interpret the results of these tests, it is necessary to determine the usual responses of patient's plasma. We have used several coagulation tests in a prospective study including 106 patients receiving thromboprophylactic treatment with dabigatran 150 or 220 mg od and rivaroxaban 10 mg od for major orthopaedic surgery. The most common tests--prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)--give results, which vary according to the reagent used. To overcome this limitation, we advocate the use of plasma calibrators, which decreases the inter-laboratory heterogeneity of results. Anti-Xa measurement and Hemoclot, a thrombin diluted clotting assay, are specific assays which have been proposed for rivaroxaban and dabigatran respectively. These tests, conventional PT, aPTT and thrombin generation (TG) have been performed. We demonstrated that measurements of both drugs can determine reliably the drug concentration in patients' plasmas. PT is more prolonged with rivaroxaban than with dabigatran. Interestingly, the pattern of TG was clearly different in relation to the difference in the mechanism of action of the two new anticoagulants. A significant inter-individual variability of response is detected. Rivaroxaban--mean Cmax 140 ng/mL (extremes 0-412) induces a greater increase of PT than dabigatran. aPTT is sensitive to dabigatran. Rivaroxaban concentrations were in good agreement with two other studies while unexplained lower than expected concentrations were found in dabigatran patients receiving 220 mg once a day [mean Cmax 60 ng/mL (extremes 0-320)]. An interference by pantoprazole, a drug which reduces dabigatran absorption, could explain the observed lower than expected results.

[Rivaroxaban in prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation]. / A rivaroxaban a stroke megelozésében pitvarfibrilláló betegekben.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is well established risk factor for cardioembolic stroke. With thromboprophylatic treatment we can reduce the risk of stroke in patients with AF. Oral vitamin K antagonists (VKA) such as warfarin and acenocoumarol are effective for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. VKAs are associated with several limitations including very narrow therapeutic range, several factors (diet, drugs, alcohol consumption) affecting the effect of VKA and excessive bleeding may occur if INR value not controlled successfully. New oral anticoagulant direct Xa factor inhibitor rivaroxaban has a good therapeutic efficacy in prevention (primary and secondary) of stroke in AF patients. Its advantages are including no need for monitoring, fixed oral dose, not affected by meal, age and body weight, all of them can improve patient adherence. In ROCKET AF trial in patients with AF, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. There was no significant between-group difference in the risk of major bleeding, although intracranial and fatal bleeding occurred less frequently in the rivaroxaban group.

Clinical laboratory measurement of direct factor Xa inhibitors: anti-Xa assay is preferable to prothrombin time assay.

Apixaban and other factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors are in late-stage clinical development for prevention and treatment of thromboembolic diseases. Although routine monitoring will not be required, in certain situations assessment of drug level may be helpful. This study evaluated the suitability of commercially available prothrombin time/international normalised ratio (PT/INR) and anti-FXa activity assays to measure FXa inhibitors in plasma. Twelve PT (ISI 0.89-1.88) and three anti-Xa assays were evaluated in vitro using human plasma spiked with four FXa inhibitors (0-2,000 ng/ml). Assay variability and correlation with drug plasma exposure were evaluated in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) treated with apixaban. All FXa inhibitors prolonged PT; however, assay sensitivity was dependent on thromboplastin reagents used and FXa inhibitors tested. To achieve a doubling of PT, the concentration of each FXa inhibitor varied 2.6- to 8-fold between thromboplastin reagents. The rank order of a FXa inhibitor's effect on PT ratio varied across thromboplastin reagents. Conversion to INR increased variability. Different anti-Xa assays showed different dynamic ranges for each FXa inhibitor; however, their rank order was consistent. For apixaban, the dynamic range of <7.8-240 ng/ml, and inter- and intra-assay precision of <6% coefficient of variation by Rotachrom assay appeared suitable for the anticipated apixaban plasma concentrations with 2.5 and 5 mg bid clinical doses. The stronger correlation between apixaban plasma concentration and anti-Xa activity (r2 = 0.88-0.89) compared with PT/INR (r2 = 0.36) in patients undergoing VTE treatment suggested that anti-Xa activity was the better indicator of apixaban plasma concentrations.

A peripherally restricted cannabinoid receptor agonist produces robust anti-nociceptive effects in rodent models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain.

Cannabinoids are analgesic in man, but their use is limited by their psychoactive properties. One way to avoid cannabinoid receptor subtype 1 (CB1R)-mediated central side-effects is to develop CB1R agonists with limited CNS penetration. Activation of peripheral CB1Rs has been proposed to be analgesic, but the relative contribution of peripheral CB1Rs to the analgesic effects of systemic cannabinoids remains unclear. Here we addressed this by exploring the analgesic properties and site of action of AZ11713908, a peripherally restricted CB1R agonist, in rodent pain models. Systemic administration of AZ11713908 produced robust efficacy in rat pain models, comparable to that produced by WIN 55, 212-2, a CNS-penetrant, mixed CB1R and CB2R agonist, but AZ11713908 generated fewer CNS side-effects than WIN 55, 212-in a rat Irwin test. Since AZ11713908 is also a CB2R inverse agonist in rat and a partial CB2R agonist in mouse, we tested the specificity of the effects in CB1R and CB2R knock-out (KO) mice. Analgesic effects produced by AZ11713908 in wild-type mice with Freund's complete adjuvant-induced inflammation of the tail were completely absent in CB1R KO mice, but fully preserved in CB2R KO mice. An in vivo electrophysiological assay showed that the major site of action of AZ11713908 was peripheral. Similarly, intraplantar AZ11713908 was also sufficient to induce robust analgesia. These results demonstrate that systemic administration of AZ11713908, produced robust analgesia in rodent pain models via peripheral CB1R. Peripherally restricted CB1R agonists provide an interesting novel approach to analgesic therapy for chronic pain.

Excretion of afobazole and its metabolites with urine and feces in rats.

The amount of afobazole and identified metabolites was measured in the urine and feces of rats after intraperitoneal and peroral administration of the drug in a dose of 25 mg/kg. Over 1 day after intraperitoneal or peroral treatment with afobazole, urine and feces contained 0.1% initial compound (from administered dose) and 42.1% metabolites.

Pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, stability and toxicity of a cell-penetrating peptide-morpholino oligomer conjugate.

OBJECTIVE: Conjugation of arginine-rich cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) to phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers (PMO) has been shown to enhance cytosolic and nuclear delivery of PMO. However, the in vivo disposition of CPP-PMO is largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution, stability, and safety profile of an anti-c-myc PMO conjugated to the CPP, (RXR)4 (X = 6-aminohexanoic acid) in rats. METHODS: The PMO and CPP-PMO were administrated intravenously into rats. The concentrations of the PMO and the CPP-PMO in plasma and tissues were monitored by HPLC. The stability of the CPP portion of the CPP-PMO conjugate in rat plasma and tissue lysates was determined by mass spectrometry. The safety profile of the CPP-PMO was assessed by body weight changes, serum chemistry, and animal behavior. RESULTS: CPP conjugation improved the kinetic behavior of PMO with a 2-fold increase in the estimated elimination half-life, a 4-fold increase in volume of distribution, and increased area under the plasma concentration vs time curve. Consistent with the improved pharmacokinetic profile, conjugation to CPP increased the uptake of PMO in all tissues except brain, varied between organ type with greater uptake enhancement occurring in liver, spleen, and lungs. The CPP-PMO conjugate had greater tissue retention than the corresponding PMO. Mass spectrometry data indicated no observable degradation of the PMO portion, while there was identifiable degradation of the CPP portion. Time-dependent CPP degradation was observed in plasma and tissue lysates, with the degradation in plasma being more rapid. The pattern of degraded products differed between the plasma and lysates. Safety evaluation data showed that the CPP-PMO was well-tolerated at the dose of 15 mg/kg with no apparent signs of toxicity. In contrast, at the dose of 150 mg/kg, adverse events such as lethargy, weight loss, and elevated BUN (p < 0.01) and serum creatinine (p < 0.001) levels were recorded. Supplementation with free L-arginine ad libitum showed improved clearance of serum creatinine (p < 0.05) and BUN (p < 0.01) at the toxicological dose, suggesting that the CPP caused toxicity in kidney. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that conjugation of CPP to PMO enhances the PMO pharmacokinetic profile, tissue uptake, and subsequent retention. Therefore, when dosed at < or = 15 mg/kg, CPP is a promising transporter for enhancing PMO delivery in therapeutic settings.

Prevention and treatment of experimental thrombosis in rabbits with rivaroxaban (BAY 597939)--an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor.

Current anticoagulant therapies for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders have many drawbacks: vitamin K antagonists interact with food and drugs and require frequent laboratory monitoring, and heparins require parenteral administration. Oral rivaroxaban (BAY 597939) is a new, highly selective and potent direct factor-Xa (FXa) inhibitor with a predictable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile and could therefore be an attractive antithrombotic drug. It was the objective of this study to investigate the antithrombotic efficacy of oral rivaroxaban in two rabbit models of experimental venous thrombosis. In the venous stasis (prevention) model, animals were randomized to receive oral rivaroxaban 0.3, 1.0, 3.0 or 10.0 mg/kg or vehicle control. Thrombosis was induced by jugular vein stasis and injection of thromboplastin into the ear vein. In the venous thrombosis (treatment) model, intravenous (1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg) and oral (3.0 mg/kg) rivaroxaban was compared with intravenous nadroparin (40 U bolus and 20 U/h), fondaparinux (42 microg/kg) and vehicle control. Thrombus growth was assessed by measuring the accretion of radiolabelled fibrinogen into preformed clots in the jugular veins. Bleeding was assessed using an ear bleeding model. In the prevention model, rivaroxaban reduced thrombus formation dose-dependently (calculated ED(50) 1.3 mg/kg). In the treatment model, oral rivaroxaban (3.0 mg/kg) reduced thrombus growth to a similar extent to intravenous rivaroxaban (1.0 mg/kg), nadroparin and fondaparinux. Oral rivaroxaban did not prolong bleeding time. In conclusion, the orally available selective, direct FXa inhibitor rivaroxaban is effective in the prevention and treatment of venous thrombosis in two well-established models of experimental thrombosis.

A sensitive gas chromatographic assay for the determination of serum viloxazine concentration using a nitrogen-phosphorus-selective detector.

A gas-liquid chromatographic procedure for measuring the serum levels of the antidepressant viloxazine is described. The drug and the internal standard [imipramine (IMI)] are extracted from 1 ml serum. The method involves a three-step extraction, derivatization of viloxazine with acetic anhydride, and injection into a gas chromatograph equipped with a nitrogen-phosphorus-selective detector. The retention times for IMI and viloxazine were 4.7 and 6.1 min, respectively. The standard curves were linear over the 100- to 2,000-ng/ml range. The recovery averaged 64.5% and the lowest detection limit was 80 ng/ml. The within-run and day-to-day coefficients of variations were 11.9 and 12.5%, respectively, at 250 ng/ml, and 8.9 and 9.2%, respectively, at 1,500 ng/ml. The method is adequate both for single-dose pharmacokinetic studies and for monitoring serum viloxazine levels in chronically treated patients.