Nutritional Status Predicts the Length of Stay and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Electrotherapy Procedures.

(1) Background: Nutritional status is a factor that impacts the patients' outcomes in various medical conditions including cardiovascular patients or surgical procedures. However, there is limited available information about its impact on the short-term outcomes of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantations. This study aimed to assess the relationship between nutritional status, complications, mortality risk, and length of stay at the hospital in patients undergoing CIED implantations. (2) Material and Methods: 588 patients who underwent CIED implantation in 2022 and 2023 were included in the retrospective analysis. The nutritional status assessment was performed using NRS 2002 and BMI. The implanted devices were single-chamber pacemakers (n = 82), dual-chamber pacemakers (n = 329), one-chamber ICDs (n = 83), dual-chamber ICDs (n = 19), CRT-P (n = 19), and CRT-D (n = 56). (3) Results: The regression analysis showed that the NRS 2002 score predicted the length of stay (age-adjusted: ß = 1.02, p = 0.001) among the CIED-implanted patients. The CRT-D subgroup was particularly responsible for this relationship (ß = 4.05, p = 0.003 after age adjustment). The analysis also revealed significant differences between the NRS 2002 score in the in-hospital death subgroups (1.75 ± 1.00 points for deaths vs. 1.00 ± 1.00 points for survivors; p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in nutritional status parameters regarding early complications subgroups. (4) Conclusions: This study showed that nutritional risk assessed with NRS 2002 is a predictor of length of stay (particularly for CRT-D) and mortality among patients undergoing CIED implantations. The results of the analysis point out the impact of patients' nutritional status on short-term outcomes of CIED implantations, particularly in CRT-D implants where 1 NRS 2002 point was a predictor of a mean 4.05 days (77.2%) longer hospitalization.

In-hospital mortality of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after implementation of national health insurance (NHI) in Indonesia.

BACKGROUND: The National Health Insurance (NHI) was implemented in Indonesia in 2014, and cardiovascular diseases are one of the diseases that have overburdened the healthcare system. However, data concerning the relationship between NHI and cardiovascular healthcare in Indonesia are scarce. We aimed to describe changes in cardiovascular healthcare after the implementation of the NHI while determining whether the implementation of the NHI is related to the in-hospital mortality of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: This is a retrospective comparative study of two cohorts in which we compared the data of 364 patients with ACS from 2013 to 2014 (Cohort 1), before and early after NHI implementation, with those of 1142 patients with ACS from 2018 to 2020 (Cohort 2), four years after NHI initiation, at a tertiary cardiac center in Makassar, Indonesia. We analyzed the differences between both cohorts using chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test. To determine the association between NHI and in-hospital mortality, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: We observed an increase in NHI users (20.1% to 95.6%, p < 0.001) accompanied by a more than threefold increase in patients with ACS admitted to the hospital in Cohort 2 (from 364 to 1142, p < 0.001). More patients with ACS received invasive treatment in Cohort 2, with both thrombolysis and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rates increasing more than twofold (9.2% to 19.2%; p < 0.001). There was a 50.8% decrease in overall in-hospital mortality between Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated the potential beneficial effect of universal health coverage (UHC) in improving cardiovascular healthcare by providing more accessible treatment. It can provide evidence to urge the Indonesian government and other low- and middle-income nations dealing with cardiovascular health challenges to adopt and prioritize UHC.

Glutamine Supplementation on Burn Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

To evaluate the effect of glutamine supplement on patients with burns, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis via synthesizing up-to-date studies. Databases including PubMed, Cochrane Central Register, EMBASE, Google scholar, Wanfang data, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to October 2023 to find randomized trials evaluating glutamine supplement on patients with burns. The main outcomes included hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, infection, and wound healing. Twenty-two trials that randomized a total of 2170 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled the length of hospital stay was shortened by glutamine supplement (weighted mean differences [WMD] = -7.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] -10.53 to -5.36, I2 = 67.9%, 16 trials). Both pooled wound healing rates (WMD = 9.15, 95% CI 6.30 to 12.01, I2 = 82.7%, 6 studies) and wound healing times (WMD = -5.84, 95% CI -7.42 to -4.27, I2 = 45.7%, 7 studies) were improved by glutamine supplement. Moreover, glutamine supplement reduced wound infection (risk ratios [RR] = 0.38, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.69, I2 = 0%, 3 trials), but not nonwound infection (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.05, I2 = 39.6%, 9 trials). Neither in-hospital mortality (RR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.22, I2 = 36.0%, 8 trials) nor the length of intensive care unit stay (WMD = 1.85, 95% CI -7.24 to 10.93, I2 = 78.2%, 5 studies) was improved by glutamine supplement. Subgroup analysis showed positive effects were either influenced by or based on small-scale, single-center studies. Based on the current available data, we do not recommend the routine use of glutamine supplement for burn patients in hospital. Future large-scale randomized trials are still needed to give a conclusion about the effect of glutamine supplement on burn patients.

A Step Towards Building Health Digital Twins: Patient Phenotype Representation for Health Outcome Prediction.

Precision medicine aims to provide more effective interventions and preventive options to patients by considering their individual risk factors and by employing available evidence. This proof of concept study presents an approach towards generating holistic virtual representations of patients, a.k.a. health digital twins. The developed virtual representations were applied in two health outcome prediction case studies for readmission and in-hospital mortality predictions. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of the virtual representations to facilitate predictive analysis in practicing precision medicine.

Glutamine enteral therapy for critically ill adult patients: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of supplemental enteral glutamine (GLN) in critical illness patients remains uncertainty. OBJECTIVE: Based on a recently published large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as regards the use of enteral GLN, we updated a meta-analysis of RCTs for further investigating the effects of enteral GLN administration in critically ill patients. METHODS: We searched RCTs reporting the impact of supplemental enteral GLN about clinical outcomes in adult critical illness patients from EMBASE, PubMed, Clinical Trials.gov, Scopus and Web of Science and subsequently registered the protocol in the PROSPERO (CRD42023399770). RCTs of combined enteral-parenteral GLN or parenteral GLN only were excluded. Hospital mortality was designated as the primary outcome. We conducted subgroup analyses of primary outcome based on specific patient populations, dosages and therapy regimens, and further performed trial sequential analysis (TSA) for clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs involving 2552 adult critically ill patients were identified. There were no remarkable influences on hospital mortality regardless of different subgroups (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.85-1.30; p = 0.67), intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) (MD, -0.07; 95% CI, -1.12 - 0.98; p = 0.89) and infectious complications (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.75-1.10; p = 0.31) with enteral GLN supplementation. Additionally, the results of hospital mortality were confirmed by TSA. However, enteral GLN therapy was related to a reduction of hospital LOS (MD, -2.85; 95% CI, -5.27 to -0.43; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, it seems that enteral GLN supplementation is unlikely ameliorate clinical outcomes in critical illness patients except for the reduction of hospital LOS. Our data do not support enteral GLN supplementation used routinely in critical illness patients.

Cefepime versus carbapenems for treatment of AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections.

PURPOSE: Cefepime is recommended for treating infections caused by AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-PE), though supporting evidence is limited. Therefore, this study compared outcomes associated with cefepime versus carbapenem therapy for bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by AmpC-PE after phenotypic exclusion of ESBL-co-producing isolates. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared definite cefepime versus carbapenem treatment for AmpC-PE BSI in hospitalized patients of the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, between 01/2015 and 07/2020. Primary outcomes included in-hospital death, renal impairment and neurologic adverse events; secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and recurrent infection. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy episodes of AmpC-PE BSI were included, 162, 77 and 31 were treated with a carbapenem, cefepime and other antibiotics, respectively. Patients treated with carbapenems were more likely to be transferred to the ICU on admission and more frequently had central venous catheter as a source of infection. In uni- and multivariable analyses, primary and secondary outcomes did not differ between the two treatment groups, except for more frequent occurrence of neurological adverse events among patients treated with carbapenems and shorter length of hospital stay among survivors treated with cefepime. CONCLUSION: After excluding isolates with phenotypic ESBL-co-production, cefepime was not associated with adverse outcomes compared to carbapenems when used to treat BSIs caused by AmpC-PE. Our study provides evidence to support the use of cefepime as a safe treatment strategy for AmpC-PE BSI, particularly in clinically stable patients without initial renal impairment or increased susceptibility to neurological adverse events.

Prediction of attributable mortality in pediatric patients with cancer admitted to the intensive care unit for suspected infection: A comprehensive evaluation of risk scores.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of existing sepsis scores for prediction of adverse outcomes in children with cancer admitted to the ICU with suspected sepsis. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review using data available at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h after ICU admission to calculate the Pediatric Risk of Mortality 3 (PRISM-3), Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA), Paediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction 2 (PELOD-2), and Quick Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scores. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to evaluate performance for prediction of attributable mortality. Sensitivity analyses included recalculation of scores using worst preceding values for each variable, excluding hematologic parameters, and prediction of alternative outcomes. SETTING: St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, a pediatric comprehensive cancer center in the USA. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients (<25 years of age) receiving conventional therapy for cancer admitted to the ICU with suspected sepsis between 2013 and 2019. RESULTS: Of 207 included episodes of suspected sepsis, attributable mortality was 16 (7.7%) and all evaluated sepsis scores performed poorly (maximal AUROC of 0.73 for qSOFA at 1 and 24 h). Sensitivity analyses did not identify an alternative approach that significantly improved prediction. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available sepsis scores perform poorly for prediction of attributable mortality in children with cancer who present to ICU with suspected sepsis. More research is needed to identify reliable predictors of adverse outcomes in this population.

Effectiveness and safety of the co-administration of Yokukan-San (Japanese herbal medicine) with antipsychotics in hospitalized older patients with pneumonia.

AIM: Behavioral and psychological symptoms and delirium frequently occur in hospitalized older patients with pneumonia and are associated with longer hospital stays. Yokukan-San (YKS, traditional Japanese [Kampo] medicine) and antipsychotics are often used to treat delirium and behavioral and psychological symptoms in Japan. Hence, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of the co-administration of YKS with atypical antipsychotics in older patients with pneumonia. METHODS: We used the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database to retrospectively identify older patients (≥65 years) hospitalized for pneumonia who received antipsychotics within 3 days of hospitalization. The patients were divided into two groups: those who received atypical antipsychotics alone (control group) and those who received both atypical antipsychotics and YKS (YKS group). We compared length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, bone fractures, and administration of potassium products between the two groups using propensity score overlap weighting. RESULT: We identified 4789 patients in the YKS group and 61 641 in the control group. After propensity score overlap weighting, length of hospital stay was statistically significantly shorter in the YKS group (percentage difference -3.0%; 95% confidence interval -5.8% to -0.3%). The proportion of patients who received potassium products was higher in the YKS group (odds ratio 1.34; 95% confidence interval 1.15-1.55). In-hospital death and bone fractures were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of YKS with atypical antipsychotics could be a reasonable treatment option for hospitalized older patients with pneumonia and aggressive psychiatric symptoms. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; 23: 849-854.

The effect of 1-hydroxy-vitamin D treatment in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of 1-hydroxy-vitamin D on the prevention of severe disease and mortality in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective study included 312 patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to our hospital between April 2021 and October 2021 (primarily the Delta variant) and between July 2022 and September 2022 (primarily Omicron variant). Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels were measured at the time of admission and 1-hydroxy-vitamin D was prescribed by the treating physicians. The patients were divided into two groups: those administered 1-hydroxy-vitamin D (Vit D group) and those who were not (control group). The composite primary endpoint was the need for additional respiratory support, including high-flow oxygen therapy or invasive mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality rate. RESULTS: Of 312 patients, 122 (39%) received 1-hydroxy-vitamin D treatment. Although the median age was not significantly higher in the Vit D group than in the control group (66 vs. 58 years old, P = 0.06) and there was no significant difference in the proportion of vitamin D deficiency (defined as serum 25(OH)D level less than 20 ng/mL, 77% vs. 65%, P = 0.07), patients in the control group had a more severe baseline profile compared to the Vit D group according to the Japanese disease severity definition for COVID-19 (P = 0.01). The proportion of those requiring more respiratory support and in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the Vit D group than in the control group (6% vs. 14%, P = 0.01 log-rank test). After propensity score matching, a statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint was observed (P = 0.03 log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: 1-hydroxy-vitamin treatment may improve outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, reducing composite outcomes including the need for additional respiratory support and in-hospital mortality.

Multi-center retrospective study of children with sickle cell disease admitted to pediatric intensive care units in the United States.

Data on outcomes and interventions for children with sickle cell disease (SCD) admitted to a pediatric intensive care units (PICU) are unknown. We provide the first comprehensive multi-center report on PICU interventions associated with death, the need for invasive respiratory support or stroke among critically ill children with SCD. We collected retrospective multi-center cohort data from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2019 utilizing the Virtual Pediatric Systems, LLC database. We identified 3388 unique children with SCD, accounting for a total of 5264 PICU admissions from 138 PICUs. The overall mortality rate for the PICU admissions cohort was 1.8% (95/5264 PICU admissions, 95/3388 [2.8%] of all unique patients), the rate of needing of needing Invasive Respiratory Support (IRS, a composite category of exposure) was 21.3% (872/4093 PICU admissions with complete data) and the overall rate of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) was 12.5% (657/5264 PICU admissions). In multivariable analysis adjusting for admission age category, sex, race/ethnicity, PRISM-3 score at admission, exposure to IRS, quartile of unit volume of patients with SCD, and patient origin, admitted children who needed invasive respiratory support (IRS) had higher adjusted odds ratios for mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 19.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.98-43.29; p < 0.001), although admitted children > 2 years old had decreased aOR for needing IRS (aOR 0.25-0.62; 95% CI 0.16-0.94; p < 0.001-0.025). By contrast, admitted children > 2 years old had a strikingly increased aOR for stroke (aOR 7.57-16.32; 95% CI 2.25-52.15; p < 0.001). These groups may represent PICU-specific subsets of patients with SCD who are at higher risk for more serious illness and should deserve early consideration for referral to a pediatric institution providing comprehensive care for patients with SCD.

Hypothermia or hyperthermia, which is associated with patient outcomes in critically ill children with sepsis? -A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: In the early stage of sepsis, identifying high-risk paediatric patients with a poor prognosis and providing timely and adequate treatment are critical. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of average body temperature within 24 hours of admission on the short-term prognosis of paediatric patients with sepsis. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single-centre, tertiary care hospital in China, containing patient data from 2010 to 2018. PARTICIPANTS: 1144 patients with sepsis were included. INTERVENTION: None. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality, which was defined as death from any cause during hospitalisation. The secondary outcome was the length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The LOWESS method showed a roughly 'U'-shaped relationship between body temperature on the first day and in-hospital mortality. Multivariate logistic regression showed that severe hypothermia (OR 14.72, 95% CI 4.84 to 44.75), mild hypothermia (OR 3.71, 95% CI 1.26 to 10.90), mild hyperthermia (OR 3.41, 95% CI 1.17 to 9.90) and severe hyperthermia (OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.84 to 14.43) were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Compared with other variables, the Wald χ2 value of temperature on the first day minus the degree of freedom was the highest. CONCLUSIONS: Whether hypothermic or hyperthermic, the more abnormal the temperature on the first day is, the higher the risk of in-hospital death in children with sepsis.

The impact of COVID-19 on emergency department boarding and in-hospital mortality.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has been challenging for healthcare systems in the United States and globally. Understanding how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted emergency departments (EDs) and patient outcomes in a large integrated healthcare system may help prepare for future pandemics. Our primary objective was to evaluate if there were changes to ED boarding and in-hospital mortality before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients ages 18 and over who presented to one of 17 EDs (11 hospital-based; 6 freestanding) within our healthcare system. The study timeframe was March 1, 2019- February 29, 2020 (pre-pandemic) vs. March 1, 2020-August 31, 2021 (during the pandemic). Categorical variables are described using frequencies and percentages, and p-values were obtained from Pearson chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests where appropriate. In addition, multiple regression analysis was used to compare ED boarding and in-hospital mortality pre-pandemic vs. during the pandemic. RESULTS: A total of 1,374,790 patient encounters were included in this study. In-hospital mortality increased by 16% during the COVID-19 Pandemic AOR 1.16(1.09-1.23, p < 0.0001). Boarding increased by 22% during the COVID-19 pandemic AOR 1.22(1.20-1.23), p < 0.0001). More patients were admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic than prior to the pandemic (26.02% v 24.97%, p < 0.0001). Initial acuity level for patients presenting to the ED increased for both high acuity (13.95% v 13.18%, p < 0.0001) and moderate acuity (60.98% v 59.95%, p < 0.0001) during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic led to increased ED boarding and in-hospital mortality.

Rapid diagnostics and ceftazidime/avibactam for KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: impact on mortality and role of combination therapy.

This study was aimed at investigating risk factors for mortality in patients suffering from KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) bloodstream infections (BSIs), evaluating the impact of rapid diagnostics and ceftazidime/avibactam use. This observational retrospective study (January 2017-May 2021) included all patients with a KPC-Kp BSI. Uni-multivariable analyses were carried out to evaluate the effect of clinical variables on both in-hospital death (IHD) and 30-day all-cause mortality, and the role of the combination of ceftazidime/avibactam plus polymyxin. One hundred and ninety-six patients met the study's inclusion criteria. Older age, having undergone renal replacement therapy during the 30 days preceding the KPC-Kp BSI onset, having an INCREMENT-CPE score ≥ 8, and having suffered from a superimposed and/or following KPC-Kp BSI treatment candidemia were found to be the main factors associated with both mortality rates. Among protective factors, the centrality of ceftazidime/avibactam in monotherapy (IHD: OR: 0.34; CI 95%: 0.11-1.00-30-day all-cause mortality: OR: 0.18; CI 95%: 0.04-0.77) or combination (IHD: OR: 0.51; CI 95%: 0.22-1.19-30-day all-cause mortality: OR: 0.62; CI 95%: 0.21-1.84) emerged and became even more evident once the effect of ceftazidime/avibactam plus polymyxin was removed. Rapid diagnostics may be useful to adopt more effective strategies for the treatment of KPC-Kp BSI patients and implement infection control measures, even if not associated with higher patient survival. Ceftazidime/avibactam, even when used alone, represents an important option against KPC-Kp, while combined use with polymyxin might not have altered its efficacy. Patient comorbidities, severity of BSI, and complications such as candidemia were confirmed to have a significant burden on survival.

Effects of empiric antibiotic treatment based on hospital cumulative antibiograms in patients with bacteraemic sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of empiric antibiotics with different degrees of appropriateness based on hospital cumulative antibiograms in patients with bacteraemic sepsis presenting to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with sepsis and positive blood culture reports in the ED from February 2016 to December 2018. Based on isolated pathogens and empiric antibiotics which the patients received, these patients were divided into two groups using a cut-off of 70% for overall antimicrobial susceptibility (OAS) on hospital cumulative antibiograms 6 months prior to ED admission. Multivariate regression and sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: In this study, 1055 patients were included. We used multivariate regression models which were adjusted for age, sex, co-morbidities, site of infection, organ dysfunction, and septic shock. Empiric antibiotics with OAS of ≥70% were associated with reduced in-hospital deaths (adjusted odds ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28-0.77) and 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.86). They were more likely to result in a shortened length of intensive care unit stay by 1.60 days (95% CI, -3.00 to -0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with empiric antibiotics with OAS of ≥70% based on hospital cumulative antibiograms is associated with lower mortality and shorter length of intensive care unit stay in patients with bacteraemic sepsis in the ED.

Evaluation of the effect of a Nursing System Framework on Nurse Sensitive Indicators, mortality and readmission in an NHS Trust.

In 2018, an NHS Trust (UK) implemented an innovative Nursing System Framework (NSF). The NSF formalized a two-year strategy, which provided teams with clear aims and measurable objectives to deliver care. Failures of coordination of nursing services are well-recognized threats to the quality, safety and sustainability of care provision. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of introducing a NSF in an NHS Trust, using nursing sensitive indicators and pre-selected mortality, data outcome measures. DESIGN: A before and after implementation, observational study. METHODS: 105,437 admissions were extracted at an admission record level. Data was extracted from 1st September 2018 through to the 31st August 2019. RESULTS: Using SQUIRE guidelines to report the study, insufficient evidence was found to reject a null hypothesis with a chi-squared test of association between in-hospital death and the NSF intervention period, with a p-value of .091. However, trends were seen in the data, which suggested a positive association. CONCLUSION: The NSF is a complex intervention, which provides direction for improvements but requires further research to understand the benefits for nurses, Midwives, Health Visitors and patients.

Impact of an Interdisciplinary Goals-of-Care Program Among Medical Inpatients at a Comprehensive Cancer Center During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Propensity Score Analysis.

PURPOSE: Many hospitals have established goals-of-care programs in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic; however, few have reported their outcomes. We examined the impact of a multicomponent interdisciplinary goals-of-care program on intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and hospital outcomes for medical inpatients with cancer. METHODS: This single-center study with a quasi-experimental design included consecutive adult patients with cancer admitted to medical units at the MD Anderson Cancer Center, TX, during the 8-month preimplementation (May 1, 2019-December 31, 2019) and postimplementation period (May 1, 2020-December 31, 2020). The primary outcome was ICU mortality. Secondary outcomes included ICU length of stay, hospital mortality, and proportion/timing of care plan documentation. Propensity score weighting was used to adjust for differences in potential covariates, including age, sex, cancer diagnosis, race/ethnicity, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. RESULTS: This study involved 12,941 hospitalized patients with cancer (pre n = 6,977; post n = 5,964) including 1,365 ICU admissions (pre n = 727; post n = 638). After multicomponent goals-of-care program initiation, we observed a significant reduction in ICU mortality (28.2% v 21.9%; change -6.3%, 95% CI, -9.6 to -3.1; P = .0001). We also observed significant decreases in length of ICU stay (mean change -1.4 days, 95% CI, -2.0 to -0.7; P < .0001) and in-hospital mortality (7% v 6.1%, mean change -0.9%, 95% CI, -1.5 to -0.3; P = .004). The proportion of hospitalized patients with an in-hospital do-not-resuscitate order increased significantly from 14.7% to 19.6% after implementation (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3 to 1.5; P < .0001), and do-not-resuscitate order was established earlier (mean difference -3.0 days, 95% CI, -3.9 to -2.1; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: This study showed improvement in hospital outcomes and care plan documentation after implementation of a system-wide, multicomponent goals-of-care intervention.

Epidemiology of sepsis in Beijing from 2012 to 2018: analysis of hospital homepage databases derived from the Beijing Public Health System.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the epidemiology of sepsis in secondary and tertiary hospitals in Beijing, China between 2012 and 2018 using information derived from the Beijing Public Health System. METHODS: The Beijing Public Health System accessed hospital homepage databases and identify patients who diagnosed sepsis or associated condition according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, Clinical Modification codes. There are 125 hospitals involved in this study, including 61 secondary hospitals, accounting for 49.2%, and 63 tertiary hospitals, accounting for 50.8%. Patients were stratified by age as minors (0-17 years old), adults (18-64 years old), seniors (65-84 years old), and the elderly (≥ 85 years old). Patient's demographic information, treatments, outcomes, and all-cause hospitalization cost were evaluated. RESULTS: This study involved 8,597 patients. Patients treated in tertiary hospitals or received blood transfusion decreased with age, while patients who were male, received ventilation, or took Traditional Chinese Medicine, and in-hospital mortality and hospitalization cost, increased with age. There were 2,729 (31.7%) deaths in this study. A slight increase in in-hospital mortality occurred from 2012 to 2018. Median hospitalization cost for all patients was ¥29,453 (15,011, 65,237). Hospitalization cost showed no significant change from 2012 to 2016, but increased in 2017 and 2018. CONCLUSION: Sepsis is associated with high mortality and cost. From 2012 to 2018, in-hospital mortality and hospitalization cost of sepsis in Beijing increased significantly with age, and slightly by year.

Quantifying the breadth of antibiotic exposure in sepsis and suspected infection using spectrum scores.

A retrospective cohort study. Studies to quantify the breadth of antibiotic exposure across populations remain limited. Therefore, we applied a validated method to describe the breadth of antimicrobial coverage in a multicenter cohort of patients with suspected infection and sepsis. We conducted a retrospective cohort study across 21 hospitals within an integrated healthcare delivery system of patients admitted to the hospital through the ED with suspected infection or sepsis and receiving antibiotics during hospitalization from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017. We quantified the breadth of antimicrobial coverage using the Spectrum Score, a numerical score from 0 to 64, in patients with suspected infection and sepsis using electronic health record data. Of 364,506 hospital admissions through the emergency department, we identified 159,004 (43.6%) with suspected infection and 205,502 (56.4%) with sepsis. Inpatient mortality was higher among those with sepsis compared to those with suspected infection (8.4% vs 1.2%; P < .001). Patients with sepsis had higher median global Spectrum Scores (43.8 [interquartile range IQR 32.0-49.5] vs 43.5 [IQR 26.8-47.2]; P < .001) and additive Spectrum Scores (114.0 [IQR 57.0-204.5] vs 87.5 [IQR 45.0-144.8]; P < .001) compared to those with suspected infection. Increased Spectrum Scores were associated with inpatient mortality, even after covariate adjustments (adjusted odds ratio per 10-point increase in Spectrum Score 1.31; 95%CI 1.29-1.33). Spectrum Scores quantify the variability in antibiotic breadth among individual patients, between suspected infection and sepsis populations, over the course of hospitalization, and across infection sources. They may play a key role in quantifying the variation in antibiotic prescribing in patients with suspected infection and sepsis.

The impact of key secular trends during the first three waves the COVID-19 pandemic.

IMPORTANCE: Patient age, comorbidity burden, and disease severity at presentation are the major factors associated with surviving COVID-19. Hospital-level factors including ICU occupancy may confer additional risk to individual patients, particularly at times of maximal stress on healthcare systems. The interaction of patient- and hospital-level factors over time during pandemic disease remains an area of active exploration. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of patient and hospital risk factors during episodic surges, characterize severity distribution between waves, and evaluate patient-level impact of ICU capacity on COVID-19 survivorship. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Four acute care hospitals within an integrated healthcare network in San Diego, California. PARTICIPANTS: All patients (18+ y.o.) admitted with a positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 or ICD-10 code for COVID-19 from March 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S): Patient survivorship and length of stay. RESULTS: Six thousand eight hundred fifty-one patients were evaluated in this large cohort series. Patient level factors associated with mortality included: severity at admission (WHO Clinical Progression Score [WCPS]), age, gender, BMI, marital status, language preference, Elixhauser score, elevated laboratory (d-dimer, ferritin, LDH) or lower absolute lymphocyte count. When adjusting for patient age alone, survivorship during surges was also inversely associated with ICU occupancy, though this correlation was not present when adjusted for patient-level factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patient age, comorbidity burden, and severity at the time of presentation are the major factors associated with surviving COVID-19. Hospital-level factors including ICU occupancy may confer additional risk to individual patients, particularly at times of maximal stress on healthcare systems.

Association Between Time to Source Control in Sepsis and 90-Day Mortality.

Importance: Rapid source control is recommended to improve patient outcomes in sepsis. Yet there are few data to guide how rapidly source control is required. Objective: To determine the association between time to source control and patient outcomes in community-acquired sepsis. Design, Setting, and Particpants: Multihospital integrated health care system cohort study of hospitalized adults (January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2017) with community-acquired sepsis as defined by Sepsis-3 who underwent source control procedures. Follow-up continued through January 1, 2019, and data analyses were completed March 17, 2022. Exposures: Early (<6 hours) compared with late (6-36 hours) source control as well as each hour of source control delay (1-36 hours) from sepsis onset. Main Outcomes and Measures: Multivariable models were clustered at the level of hospital with adjustment for patient factors, sepsis severity, resource availability, and the physiologic stress of procedures generating adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% CI. Results: Of 4962 patients with sepsis (mean [SD] age, 62 [16] years; 52% male; 85% White; mean [SD] Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, 3.8 [2.5]), source control occurred at a median (IQR) of 15.4 hours (5.5-21.7) after sepsis onset, with 1315 patients (27%) undergoing source control within 6 hours. The crude 90-day mortality was similar for early and late source control (n = 177 [14%] vs n = 529 [15%]; P = .35). In multivariable models, early source control was associated with decreased risk-adjusted odds of 90-day mortality (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.80). This association was greater among gastrointestinal and abdominal (aOR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43-0.80) and soft tissue interventions (aOR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.95) compared with orthopedic and cranial interventions (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.96-1.83; P < .001 for interaction). Conclusions and Relevance: Source control within 6 hours of community-acquired sepsis onset was associated with a reduced risk-adjusted odds of 90-day mortality. Prioritizing the rapid identification of septic foci and initiation of source control interventions can reduce the number of avoidable deaths among patients with sepsis.