Lupus nephritis: new progress in diagnosis and treatment.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic multifactorial autoimmune disease that affects many organs, including the kidney. Lupus nephritis (LN) is a common manifestation characterized by heterogeneous clinical and histopathological findings, and often associates with poor prognosis. The diagnosis and treatment of LN is challenging, depending largely on renal biopsy, and there is no reliable non-invasive LN biomarker. Up to now, the complete remission rate of LN is only 20%∼30% after receiving six months of standard treatment, which is far from satisfactory. Moreover, adverse reactions to immunosuppressants, especially glucocorticoids, further compromise the prognosis of LN. Biological reagents targetting autoimmune responses and inflammatory pathways, bring hope to the treatment of intractable lupus. The European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) and KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) have been working on and launched the recommendations for the management of LN. In this review, we update our knowledge in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of LN and prospect for the future potential targets in the management of LN.

Comparison Between Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis in the Risks for Disease Activity in LN-ESRD Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Context: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is the advanced stage of a progressive loss of kidney function. About 10% of all patients with lupus nephritis (LN) eventually progress to ESRD, which may necessitate renal replacement therapy (RRT), such as hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and/or kidney transplant. Research hasn't confirmed which dialysis options, prior to kidney transplantation, are beneficial to patients' prognoses. Objective: The study intended to compare the risks-related to disease activity, exercise, all-cause infection, all-cause cardiovascular events, and mortality-of the use of HD and PD for LN-ESRD adults, as the initial alternative treatment before renal transplantation. Design: The research team performed a narrative review and analyzed the data obtained about clinical outcomes for HD and peritoneal dialysis. For the review, the research team searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases. The search used the keywords: end-stage renal disease, renal replacement therapy, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Setting: The study made in Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, China. Participants: The studies included 15 636 patients who had been diagnosed with LN-ESRD prior to renal transplantation. Outcome Measures: For the data analysis, the research team divided the data into two groups, one of which included the data on the clinical outcomes for HD patientsand one of which included the data on the clinical outcomes for PD patients. The study evaluated four types of risks: lupus-flare risks, all-cause infection risks, all-cause cardiovascular events risk, and risk of mortality. Results: The 16 studies found in the review reported one or more outcomes of interest for the two dialysis modalities, HD and PD. The analysis of the data from the 16 studies showed that HD was associated with a higher risk than PD: (1) of lupus flares, with RR = 1.23 (confidence interval: 0.82, 1.85), but the difference didn't reach statistical significance (P = .31); (2) of all-cause infection risk, with RR = 1.02 (confidence interval: 0.66, 1.59), but the difference didn't reach statistical significance (P = .92); (3) of all-cause cardiovascular events, with RR = 1.44 (confidence interval: 1.02, 2.04), and the difference reached statistical significance (P = .04); and (4) of mortality risk, with RR = 1.29 (confidence interval: 0.95, 1.75), but the difference didn't reach statistical significance (P = .10). Conclusions: The current study may have reference significance for clinical treatment of ESRD. Except for all-cause cardiovascular events in which PD was superior to HD, offering better outcomes, both treatment modalities provide more or less similar clinical outcomes as effective initial choices for RRT in LN-ESRD patients prior to renal transplant. The current research team, however, encourages further research on the question, addressing better the possible sources of biases encountered in the current study.

Reno-Protective Effect of Realgar Nanoparticles on Lupus Nephritis of MRL/Lpr Mice through STAT1.

BACKGROUND: Realgar, an arsenic tetrasulfide compound, is a highly recognized traditional Chinese medicinal prescription that has been widely used to treat various diseases such as inflammatory diseases. However, there are still some problems in the clinical treatment of Realgar, such as large oral dose and high potential toxicity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effects of Realgar nanoparticles on lupus nephritis (LN) in vivo in MRL/lpr mice. METHODS: Ten-week mice were orally administered every day for eight consecutive weeks except the mice of normal model groups. The serum levels of anti-ds-DNA antibody IgG, IgM, IFN-γ, Creatinine (Cr), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were determined, and 24-hour urine protein was also measured. Renal inflammatory pathology analysis was assessed by hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining. The expression of phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (p-STAT 1) and Janus Kinase 1 (JAK 1) in kidney tissue was determined by direct reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: The mice treated with Realgar nanoparticle in the high dose-treated (Realgar HD, 0.03 g/kg/d) group exhibited significantly reduced serum levels of anti-dsDNA (p<0.01), IgG (p<0.01), IgM (p<0.01), BUN (p<0.01), Cr (p<0.01), and inflammatory cytokine IFN-γ (p<0.01) as well as proteinuria (p<0.01) compared to the untreated model MRL/lpr mice. Additionally, high doses of Realgar nanoparticles significantly suppressed the phosphorylations of STAT 1(p<0.01) and the renal pathological changes. CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates that Realgar nanoparticles may be a potential agent to treat LN, and the down-regulated p-STAT1 expression suggests that it may be one of the LN treatment targets for Realgar nanoparticles.

Integrated therapy improve urinary total protein in patients with lupus nephritis: A case report.

OBJECTIVES: To report on the potential effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) as part of an integrated treatment for lupus nephritis. CLINICAL FEATURES AND OUTCOME: A 55-year-old female with systemic lupus erythematosus had experienced bilateral lower-limbs edema for half a year. Her urinary total protein (M-TP) was 1367.9 mg/24 h. Lupus nephritis (LN) was suspected by the Division of Rheumatology without a renal biopsy. Oral corticosteroid medication did not improve the edema; therefore, the patient requested CHM for integrated therapy, and was subsequently treated for seven months with a modified CHM prescription mainly composed of Zhi-Bo-Di-Huang-Wan, Gui-Shao-Zhi-Mu-Tang, and Zhu-Ling-Tang. After three days of CHM, her bilateral lower-limbs edema significantly improved, and after 143 days, her M-TP decreased from 1367.9 mg/24 h to 143.6 mg/24 h. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated therapy could significantly improve proteinuria by reducing this LN patients' urinary total protein, which further implies that CHM may have a protective effect against the progression of LN in this patient.

Integrative medicine for managing the symptoms of lupus nephritis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Integrative medicine is claimed to improve symptoms of lupus nephritis. No systematic reviews have been performed for the application of integrative medicine for lupus nephritis on patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Thus, this review will aim to evaluate the current evidence on the efficacy of integrative medicine for the management of lupus nephritis in patients with SLE. METHODS AND ANALYSES: The following electronic databases will be searched for studies published from their dates of inception February 2018: Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), as well as 6 Korean medical databases (Korea Med, the Oriental Medicine Advanced Search Integrated System [OASIS], DBpia, the Korean Medical Database [KM base], the Research Information Service System [RISS], and the Korean Studies Information Services System [KISS]), and 1 Chinese medical database (the China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI]). Study selection, data extraction, and assessment will be performed independently by 2 researchers. The risk of bias (ROB) will be assessed using the Cochrane ROB tool. DISSEMINATION: This systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated both electronically and in print. The review will be updated to inform and guide healthcare practice and policy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018085205.

A comprehensive evaluation for the treatment of lupus nephritis.

Systemic lupus is the prototypic human autoimmune disease. It is a kaleidoscope of autoreactivities, with clear indications of both a genetic and environmental basis. Indeed, it is a disease that can manifest in virtually every tissue and organ and can also be found spontaneously in a number of animal species, including dogs, cats and horses. Moreover, there are multiple murine models of lupus, the first of which, New Zealand Black (NZB) mice, were discovered in 1959. Despite an enormous effort from scientists in multiple disciplines, the etiology of lupus remains elusive and the introduction of new therapies has been disappointing. Fortunately, significant advances have occurred to help patients through the general principles of internal medicine, including antibiotics, dialysis, and of course use of steroids and immunosuppressive agents. However, the magic bullet has yet to be discovered. One of the major causes of morbidity in lupus remains lupus nephritis and there has been significant effort and encouragement in understanding the pathogenesis, renal histologic classification, and use of therapeutic protocols to induce and sustain remission of lupus nephritis. Indeed, the first use of evidence-based clinical trials in lupus was initiated by Dr. Alfred D. Steinberg at NIH in pioneering studies involving either oral or intravenous pulses of cyclophosphamide, azathioprine or corticosteroids alone and/or some combination. Cyclophosphamide intravenously proved to be superior and the use of cyclophosphamide in combination with methylprednisolone remained the standard protocol for the treatment of lupus nephritis for decades. Although alternative therapies have been introduced, including mycophenolate mofetil, the use of therapies first pioneered at NIH may still be considered standard of care in the appropriate indications. More targeted therapies are much desired. In this review we provide a comprehensive overview of lupus nephritis and the evolution of clinical treatments.

Lupus nephritis: An approach to diagnosis and treatment in South Africa.

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Delayed recognition and diagnosis of LN may be a common cause of chronic kidney disease among South Africans. Renal biopsy is the gold standard of diagnosing LN; however, this service is not available in many centres and the use of urinalysis, urine microscopic examination and other serological tests can be useful in identifying patients with proliferative LN. Proliferative types of LN (class III, class IV and mixed class V)comprise the larger proportion of patients with this condition. Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy need to be monitored closely for side-effects and drug-related toxicities. LN patients with end-stage renal disease (class VI) need to be prepared for renal replacement therapy (dialysis and renal transplantation). In all patients, treatment should include adjunctive therapies such as renin angiotensin aldosterone system blockade, bone protection (with calcium supplements and vitamin D), blood pressure control and chloroquine­all of which help to retard the progression of kidney disease.

Role of meditation in reducing sympathetic hyperactivity and improving quality of life in lupus nephritis patients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Lupus nephritis is an important leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) among the young population in Thailand. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is often characterized by the presence of sympathetic hyperactivity, which results in a perishing outcome. Some physiological studies reveal that meditation may reduce this autonomic dysfunction. The authors hypothesized that meditation could be beneficial in alleviating the sympathetic hyperactivity and improving quality of life in lupus nephritis patients with CKD. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The authors performed a prospective pilot study, which enrolled lupus nephritis patients and categorized enrollees into meditation group and control group. Method of meditation was instructed by an expert in Buddhist studies for a duration of 60 minutes every month. Participants in the intervention group were advised to meditate every day for 24 weeks. To evaluate change in sympathetic activity, normetanephrine level was measured at beginning and the end of study and compared between both groups. Quality of life was determined by SF-36. Heart rate variability was also assessed in meditation group. RESULTS: Thirty eligible patients were recruited into the study. Fifteen patients were stratified in the meditation group and 15 patients in the control group. After meditation for 6 months, serum normetanephrine level decreased, but without statistical significance (0.105 vs. 0.059, p = 0.28). The reduction in normetanephrine level was also observed in the control group (p = 0.11). In the aspect of quality of life, scores of physical and mental components improved significantly. In meditation group, physical component score increased from 21.4 (5.0-50.2) to 62.2 (51.8-88.4) points (p < 0.01) and mental score increased from 16.9 (4.4-46.0) to 72.4 (45.1-81.6) points (p < 0.01). Quality of life score in the meditation group significantly increased more than in control group (p < 0.01). The parameter of heart rate variability in time and frequency domain also improved in the meditation group. CONCLUSION: In lupus nephritis patients with CKD, meditation shows a trend of benefits in reducing sympathetic overactivity and improving quality of life. Our results support the important role of meditation as a valuable adjunctive treatment of lupus nephritis with CKD.

CCR1 inhibition ameliorates the progression of lupus nephritis in NZB/W mice.

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease, the development of which is characterized by a progressive loss of renal function. Such dysfunction is associated with leukocyte infiltration in the glomerular and tubulointerstitial compartments in both human and experimental lupus nephritis. In this study, we investigated the role of the Ccr1 chemokine receptor in this infiltration process during the progression of nephritis in the lupus-prone New Zealand Black/New Zealand White (NZB/W) mouse model. We found that peripheral T cells, mononuclear phagocytes, and neutrophils, but not B cells, from nephritic NZB/W mice were more responsive to Ccr1 ligands than the leukocytes from younger prenephritic NZB/W mice. Short-term treatment of nephritic NZB/W mice with the orally available Ccr1 antagonist BL5923 decreased renal infiltration by T cells and macrophages. Longer Ccr1 blockade decreased kidney accumulation of effector/memory CD4(+) T cells, Ly6C(+) monocytes, and both M1 and M2 macrophages; reduced tubulointerstitial and glomerular injuries; delayed fatal proteinuria; and prolonged animal lifespan. In contrast, renal humoral immunity was unaffected in BL5923-treated mice, which reflected the unchanged numbers of infiltrated B cells in the kidneys. Altogether, these findings define a pivotal role for Ccr1 in the recruitment of T and mononuclear phagocyte cells to inflamed kidneys of NZB/W mice, which in turn contribute to the progression of renal injury.

Filter membrane-based automated therapeutic plasma exchange: a report of two cases from Nigeria.

These case reports demonstrated the diagnostic dilemma encountered in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura particularly in settings with limited diagnostic facilities and laboratory support. The similarities in the diagnostic criteria for both conditions make clear distinction as well as management decisions difficult. We present the difficulties encountered with both the diagnosis and the management of these two patients that were managed in our facility.

[Modern methods for diagnosis and therapy of lupus nephritis]. / Nowoczesne metody diagnostyczne i terapeutyczne nefropatii toczniowej.

Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most serious manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Renal biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis of lupus nephritis. The wide spectrum ofmorphologic, immunohistological, and ultrastructural abnormalities reflects the clinical course, therapy planning, and prognosis as to renal function and patient survival. Conventional clinical parameters, such as creatinine clearance, proteinuria, urine sediment, anti-dsDNA antibodies, and complement levels are not sensitive or specific enough for monitoring disease activity. Thus, novel biomarkers are necessary which could be used for diagnosis, therapeutic monitoring, early detection of exacerbations, and prognosis. This article reviews promising biomarkers, all of which await evaluation in clinical trials. Additionally, current therapeutic options in LN are discussed.

Newer drugs for the treatment of lupus nephritis.

This article first reviews the current treatment of lupus nephritis, with a focus on the most serious forms, that is, the proliferative subtypes. Current standards for treatment have been developed empirically. Corticosteroids form the basis of all regimens. Cyclophosphamide given intravenously for prolonged periods is the current gold standard. Azathioprine can be regarded as an effective drug for maintenance treatment of lupus nephritis. Studies on its efficacy in schedules for remission induction are in progress. It has been learned from studies on 'conventional' immunosuppression that randomised, clinical trials should comprise large numbers of patients and a follow-up of many years to elucidate differences between effective strategies. These requirements are not met by any of the 'new' treatments we discuss in this review. There is only limited experience in patients with lupus nephritis with drugs that are currently used for immunosuppression in other autoimmune diseases, such as methotrexate, cyclosporin and high-dose intravenous gammaglobulins, nor with new immunosuppressive drugs that have been developed for immunosuppression in organ transplantation (mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, fludarabine and cladribine). Hormonal therapy with the weak androgen prasterone (dehydroepiandrosterone; DHEA) has no role in treatment of active lupus nephritis. There are interesting experiences with agents that have evolved from progress in immunobiology and in our understanding of immunological processes. These modalities enable more specific immunosuppression and include monoclonal antibodies directed at immune cells, cytokines and components of the complement system, constructs developed to induce tolerance in pathogenic B cells, and gene therapy. Finally, we review data on autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. We conclude that some strategies (like mycophenolate mofetil) are good candidates for further investigation in large-scale, prospective, randomised trials with prolonged follow-up (which are almost by definition hard to perform). Most new biological agents still are in a pre-clinical phase.

Clinical trials in lupus nephritis.

Significant advances in the treatment of lupus nephritis have been made in the last 50 years, beginning with the use of high doses of corticosteroids. The addition of intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) to steroids, a regimen introduced by the National Institutes of Health, has become the standard of care therapy for severe active nephritis. However, not all patients respond to IVC, and among those who do, manifestations of toxicity (nausea, vomiting, alopecia, sterility, increased risk of infection, and increased risk of malignancy) are frequent. Despite successful induction and maintenance therapy with IVC, there is a relapse rate of more than 50% after 10 years. In recent years, new immunosuppressive agents have been studied as potential alternatives to IVC. The most promising of these appears to be mycofenolate mofetil, which is being evaluated in clinical trials. Biologic agents designed to interfere with the immunologic process leading to B- and T-lymphocyte activation are also being tested as alternative therapies in lupus nephritis.

Advances in the treatment of lupus nephritis.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that leads to the formation and deposition of immune complexes throughout the body, which are pathogenic for the disease. Different forms of glomerulonephritis can occur in patients with SLE and can contribute significantly to the associated morbidity and, ultimately, mortality from the disease. Over the past two decades, there have been significant strides in our understanding of the disease and in treatments that attempt to control the formation and deposition of anti-DNA auto-antibodies and immune complexes, as well as the subsequent inflammatory cascade mediated through various cellular and humoral pathways leading to progressive renal damage and end-stage renal disease. In this chapter, we review the current understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment of lupus nephritis in its various stages and discuss the experimental and human data regarding some of the potential newer forms of therapy. We discuss data regarding the use of steroids, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil, gammaglobulin, plasmapheresis, LJP 394, flaxseed oil, bindarit, anti-CD40 ligand, and CTLA4Ig.