[Comparative analysis of bone complications/manifestations in sporadic and MEN1-related primary hyperparathyroidism].

BACKGROUND: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) - is a rare syndrome with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern caused by a mutation in the tumor suppressor gene (MEN1). Parathyroid involvement is the most common MEN1 manifestation resulting in primary hyperparathyroidism (mPHPT). Data on the prevalence and structure of bone disease in mPHPT compared to sporadic one (sPHPT) are often incomplete and contradictory. AIM: The purpose of this study was to compare the severity of bone involvement between mPHPT and sPHPT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was conducted among young patients in the active phase of PHPT and without prior parathyroidectomy in anamnesis. The analysis included the main parameters of calcium-phosphorus metabolism, bone remodeling markers, as well as an assessment of disease complications. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at sites of lumbar spine, femur and radius. Trabecular bone score (TBS) was applied to estimate trabecular microarchitecture. All patients included in the study underwent genetic testing. RESULTS: Group 1 (mPHPT) included 26 patients, and group 2 (sSHPT) included 30 age-matched patients: the median age in group 1 was 34.5 years [25; 39], in group 2 - 30.5 years [28; 36], (p=0.439, U-test). Within group 1, the subgroup 1A (n=21) was formed with patients without other hormone-produced neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) in the gastrointestinal tract (GI) and the anterior pituitary gland. The duration of PHPT was comparable in both groups: mPHPT - 1 year [0; 3] versus sPHPT - 1 year [0; 1], (p=0.533, U-test). There were no differences in the main parameters of calcium-phosphorus metabolism, as well as in the prevalence of kidney complications. In the mPHPT group, bone abnormalities were observed significantly more often compared to sPHPT: 54 vs 10% (p=<0.001; F-test). Statistically significant differences were revealed both in BMD and in Z-score values of the femoral neck and total hip, which were lower in the mPHPT group. These differences remained significant when comparing subgroup 1A with sPHPT. CONCLUSION: MEN1-associated PHPT may be accompanied by a more severe decrease in BMD in the femoral neck and total hip compared to sPHPT regardless of the other hormone-producing NEN. Clarifying the role of mutation in the MEN1 gene in these processes requires further study.

All you need to know about gastrinoma today | Gastrinoma and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: A thorough update.

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) is a distinct syndrome characterized by hyperchlorhydria-induced peptic ulcer disease and chronic diarrhea. It is the result of a gastrin-excess state caused by a duodenal or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor referred to as gastrinoma. This gastrin-secreting neuroendocrine tumor is usually sporadic in nature, or part of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome. The high rate of malignancy associated with gastrinomas substantiates the need for early diagnosis. In order to diagnose ZES with laboratory tests, patients under antacid medication are required to stay off proton pump inhibitors for at least one week and H2 receptor antagonists for 48 h. Fasting serum gastrin level measurement serves as an initial and fundamental diagnostic test, boasting a sensitivity of 99%. Gastrinoma patients will present with a gastrin level greater than 100 pg/mL, while a serum gastrin level higher than 1000 pg/mL, in the presence of gastric pH <2, is considered diagnostic. Since more common causes of hypergastrinemia exist in the setting of hypochlorhydria, ruling those out should precede ZES consideration. Such causes include atrophic gastritis, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-associated pangastritis, renal failure, vagotomy, gastric outlet obstruction and retained antrum syndrome. The secretin stimulation test and the calcium gluconate injection test represent classic adjuvant diagnostic techniques, while alternative approaches are currently being introduced and evaluated. Specifically, the secretin stimulation test aids in differentiating ZES cases from other hypergastrinemic states. Its principle is based on secretin stimulation of gastrinoma cells to secrete gastrin, while inhibiting normal G cells. The rapid intravenous infusion of 4 µg/kg secretin over 1 min is followed by gastrin level evaluation at specific intervals post-infusion. Localization of the primary tumor and its metastases is the next diagnostic step when gastrinoma-associated ZES is either suspected or biochemically confirmed. Endoscopic ultrasound has showcased sensitivity as high as 83% for pancreatic gastrinomas and is considered the primary modality in such cases, although its tumor detection rates are substantially lower in duodenal lesions. Gallium-68 radiotracers, especially DOTATOC with positron emission tomography, are currently setting the standard in tumor localization, enhancing traditional imaging techniques and showcasing high sensitivity and specificity. Although gastrinomas have been reported in various anatomic locations, the vast majority arise in a specific site named the "gastrinoma triangle", involving parts of the duodenum, pancreas and extra-hepatic biliary system. Proton pump inhibitors serve as the cornerstone of symptomatic ZES treatment. Surgery is routinely performed in localized sporadic ZES, irrespective of imaging results. ZES in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 requires work-up for evaluation and treatment of hyperparathyroidism, while surgery might be an option for selected cases. In cases of advanced and metastatic disease, there is a variety of potential treatments, ranging for somatostatin analogs to chemotherapeutic drugs, liver-directed therapies and liver transplantation, while neither hepatic metastases, nor locally invasive disease necessarily preclude surgical management. This article thoroughly and critically reviews available literature and provides an extensive and multidimensional overview of ZES, along with current controversies regarding management of this disease.

How to treat gastrinomas in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type1: surgery or long-term proton pump inhibitors?

In patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome (MEN 1) and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES), gastrinomas arise from the duodenum, about 60% are multiple, and about 15% of patients have coexisting pancreatic gastrinomas, which can be localized by the selective arterial secretagogue injection test (SASI test). The guidelines (GLs) by the Japanese Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (JNETS) recommend surgical resection for functioning duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), including gastrinomas, in patients with MEN1 (Grade A, 100% agreement among members). Conversely, the GLs of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) in the USA recommend observation and treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or exploratory surgery for occult gastrinomas. An international Consensus Statement (ICS) from the European Union (EU) also does not recommend resection of gastrinomas in patients with MEN1, despite some surgeons having reported surgery being curative for gastrinomas in MEN1 patients. In this review, we discuss the serious side effects and tumorigenic effects of the prolonged use of PPIs and the safety and curability of surgery, supported by our results of curative surgery for gastrinomas in 20 patients with MEN1 over 30 years. We conclude that surgery should be the first-line treatment for gastrinomas in MEN1 patients.

[Severe bone complications of primary hyperparathyroidism in a young patient with the rare verified mutation of MEN1].

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome (MEN1) is a rare inherited disorder that can include combinations of more than 20 endocrine and non-endocrine tumors. Unfortunately, none of the described MEN1 mutations has been associated with a peculiar clinical phenotype, even within members of the same family, thus a genotype-to-phenotype correlation does not exist. MEN1 syndrome is the most common cause of hereditary primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), the disease penetrance of which exceeds 50% by the age of 20 and reaches 95% by the age of 40. At the same time, PHPT with hyperplasia or adenomas of the parathyroid glands (PTG) is the most distinctive manifestation of the MEN1 syndrome. One of the main symptoms of PHPT, both in sporadic and hereditary forms of the disease, is bone damage. At the time of diagnosis in PHPT/MEN1, the bone mineral density is generally lower in comparison with the sporadic form of PHPT. This may be due to excessive secretion of parathyroid hormone during the period of peak bone mass, concomitant components of the syndrome, extended surgical treatment, and the direct effect of a mutation in the menin gene on bone remodeling. This clinical case describes a young patient with severe bone complications of PHPT and uncertain rare MEN1 mutation. PHPT was diagnosed five years later from the first onset of bone complications and repeated orthopedic operations. There was the «hungry bones¼ syndrome after successful surgery of PHPT, which was managed with vitamin D and calcium carbonate supplementation and there is a positive dynamic in increased bone mineral density in the main skeleton after 6 months.

Occult insulinoma with treatment refractory, severe hypoglycaemia in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome; difficulties faced during diagnosis, localization and management; a case report.

BACKGROUND: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) syndrome is a rare, complex genetic disorder characterized by increased predisposition to tumorigenesis in multiple endocrine and non-endocrine tissues. Diagnosis and management of MEN 1 syndrome is challenging due to its vast heterogeneity in clinical presentation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 23-year-old female, previously diagnosed with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) and pituitary microprolactinoma presented with drowsiness,confusion and profuse sweating developing over a period of one day. It was preceded by fluctuating, hallucinatory behavior for two weeks duration. There was recent increase in appetite with significant weight gain. There was no fever, seizures or symptoms suggestive of meningism. Her Body mass index(BMI) was 32 kg/m2.She had signs of hyperandrogenism. Multiple cutaneous collagenomas were noted on anterior chest and abdominal wall. Her Glasgow Coma Scale was 9/15. Pupils were sluggishly reactive to light. Tendon reflexes were exaggerated with up going planter reflexes. Moderate hepatomegaly was present. Rest of the clinical examination was normal. Laboratory evaluation confirmed endogenous hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia suggestive of an insulinoma. Hypercalcemia with elevated parathyroid hormone level suggested a parathyroid adenoma. Presence of insulinoma, primary hyperparathyroidism and pituitary microadenoma, in 3rd decade of life with characteristic cutaneous tumours was suggestive of a clinical diagnosis of MEN 1 syndrome. Recurrent, severe hypoglycaemia complicated with hypoglycaemic encephalopathy refractory to continuous, parenteral glucose supplementation and optimal pharmacotherapy complicated the clinical course. Insulinoma was localized with selective arterial calcium stimulation test. Distal pancreatectomy and four gland parathyroidectomy was performed leading to resolution of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Renal calculi or characteristic cutaneous lesions might be the only forewarning clinical manifestations of an undiagnosed MEN 1 syndrome impending a life-threatening presentation. Comprehensive management of MEN 1 syndrome requires multi-disciplinary approach with advanced imaging modalities, advanced surgical procedures and long-term follow up due to its heterogeneous presentation and the varying severity depending on the disease phenotype.

A germline c.1546dupC MEN1 mutation in an MEN1 family: A case report.

RATIONALE: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare tumor syndrome with an autosomal dominant inheritance, and genetic testing for MEN1 gene is important for both affected individuals and their relatives. We present a 2-person family affected by a germline c.1546dupC MEN1 mutation, and one of them had a full-spectrum of MEN-related endocrine tumors. PATIENT CONCERNS: A female patient aged 32 years presented with jejunal ulcer perforation due to gastrinoma. DIAGNOSES: We conducted genetic analysis and extensive biochemical/radiological evaluation for detecting other endocrine tumors. Multiple pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), prolactinoma and primary hyperparathyroidism were diagnosed, and a frame-shift mutation, NM_130799.1:c.1546dupC (p.Arg516Profs∗15), was detected. One daughter of the proband, aged 12 years, had the same mutation for MEN1. INTERVENTION: She underwent pancreatic surgery for pancreatic NETs and total parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. OUTCOMES: After pancreatic surgery, long-term symptoms of epigastric soreness, acid belching, sweating, and palpitation in fasting were improved. Hypercalcemia was improved after parathyroidectomy and she was supplemented with oral calcium and vitamin D. Her daughter showed normal biochemical surveillance until 15 years of age. LESSONS: We report 2 people in a family affected by MEN1 with the heterozygous germline c.1546dupC mutation, a variant that should be surveilled for early development of full-blown MEN1-associated endocrine tumors.

Impact of cinacalcet hydrochloride in clinical management of primary hyperparathyroidism in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

AIM: Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is one of main cause of morbidity in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Medical therapy with cinacalcet-hydrochloride may modify the therapeutic strategy of MEN1 related PHPT. We present an experience with cinacalcet-hydrochloride in two patients with MEN1 PHPT. METHODS: The study included two MEN1 patients belonging to the same family (a 50-year-old woman and her daughter aged 20 years) with PHPT secondary to multiple involvement of parathyroid glands and other MEN1 related tumors. As both patients refused to undergo parathyroid surgery, we decided to start medical treatment with cinacalcet at the dose of 30 mg/day, which was the first treatment for the youngest patient, while the oldest had already been treated with partial parathyroidectomy. Serum concentrations of PTH, calcium and phosphorus, 24-h urine calcium-to-creatinine ratio and renal-threshold-phosphate concentration were evaluated before and after therapy. RESULTS: Serum calcium and PTH levels were normalized after 1 and 6 months of therapy, respectively, and 60 and 54 months after the beginning of cinacalcet remained normal. Hypercalciuria, hypophosphoremia and renal-threshold-phosphate normalized during therapy with cinacalcet. At ultrasonography, parathyroid nodular lesion remained unchanged. Cinacalcet was well tolerated without occurrence of side effects. CONCLUSION: Cinacalcet seems to be highly effective in controlling PHPT in patients with MEN1 either in naïve patients or in those with postsurgical recurrence. If cinacalcet will be confirmed to ensure a long-time control of PHPT or even to prevent the development and progression of PHPT, this may led to modify the therapeutic strategy of MEN1 PHPT.