Association of Glycated Hemoglobin With a Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in High-Risk Individuals Based on Genetic and Family History.

INTRODUCTION: Screening for pancreatic cancer (PC) is suggested for high-risk individuals. Additional risk factors may enhance early detection in this population. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study among patients with germline variants and/or familial pancreatic cancer in an integrated healthcare system between 2003 and 2019. We calculated the incidence rate (IR) by risk category and performed a nested case-control study to evaluate the relationship between HbA1C and PC within 3 years before diagnosis (cases) or match date (controls). Cases were matched 1:4 by age, sex, and timing of HbA1c. Logistic regression was performed to assess an independent association with PC. RESULTS: We identified 5,931 high-risk individuals: 1,175(19.8%) familial PC, 45(0.8%) high-risk germline variants ( STK11, CDKN2A ), 4,097(69.1%) had other germline variants ( ATM, BRCA 1, BRCA 2, CASR, CDKN2A, CFTR, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, PRSS1, STK11, and TP53 ), and 614(10.4%) had both germline variants and family history. Sixty-eight patients (1.1%) developed PC; 50% were metastatic at diagnosis. High-risk variant was associated with greatest risk of PC, IR = 85.1(95% confidence interval: 36.7-197.6)/10,000 person-years; other germline variants and first-degree relative had IR = 33 (18.4, 59.3), whereas IR among ≥2 first-degree relative alone was 10.7 (6.1, 18.8). HbA1c was significantly higher among cases vs controls (median = 7.0% vs 6.4%, P = 0.02). In multivariable analysis, every 1% increase in HbA1c was associated with 36% increase in odds of PC (odds ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.72). Pancreatitis was independently associated with a risk of PC (odds ratio 3.93, 95% confidence limit 1.19, 12.91). DISCUSSION: Risk of PC varies among high-risk individuals. HbA1c and history of pancreatitis may be useful additional markers for early detection in this patient population.

Evaluating implementation of NCCN guideline-directed genetic screening recommendations for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: In 2019, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommended genetic testing for all patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). To evaluate the status of implementation of these guidelines in a loco-regional setting, we performed a retrospective, observational study among patients with newly diagnosed PDAC who received oncologic care at Northeast Georgia Medical Center in Georgia. METHODS: Chart abstraction of patients with newly diagnosed PDAC from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021 was performed to include information on genetic testing recommendation and completion, and time from diagnosis to testing. The deidentified dataset was then analyzed using appropriate descriptive and associative statistical testing. RESULTS: Of the cohort of 109 patients, 32 (29.4%) completed genetic screening; 16 (14.7%) were screened within 10 days of diagnosis. Among the 77 (70.6%) patients who did not receive genetic screening, 45 (41.3%) were not recommended genetic screening despite treatment intent with standard of care therapy. However, 32 (29.4%) were not recommended genetic screening in conjunction with a desire to pursue palliative care/hospice/or due to terminal illness. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted the gap in implementation of NCCN guideline-directed genetic testing in PDAC patients as only a third underwent testing suggesting the need for systematic processes to facilitate testing. The test was more likely to be completed if done early in the course, especially soon after the diagnosis. Research is needed to explore discussing genetic testing for the large proportion of patients who are terminally ill at diagnosis where genetic screening would potentially benefit the family members.

Nutritional management of the patient with pancreatic cancer: from the diagnostic and therapeutic pathway to an integrated hospital-territory approach.

Abstract: Pancreatic cancer is associated to a high risk of malnutrition and neoplastic cachexia even at first diagnosis. Malnutrition is a negative prognostic factor for the outcome of surgery or medical oncology treatments. Despite the good awareness of the problem and the knowledge of the guidelines, the early recognition of malnutrition and its management are still uneven, mainly due to the lack of implementation of standardized and shared protocols and the shortage of dedicated clinical nutritionists and dieticians. An early and appropriate nutritional intervention is mandatory to improve the outcome of patients with pancreatic cancer at any stage of disease. The Mini Nutritional Assessment is useful tool to screen patients malnourished or at risk of malnutrition. The need for the establishment and implementation of an integrated hospital - territorial assistance as well as a home-delivered nutrition service is discussed.

Adherence to NCCN Genetic Testing Guidelines in Pancreatic Cancer and Impact on Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 2019 Guidelines recommend universal germline (GL) testing for patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer (PC), given germline mutations (gMut) can occur at a similar rate irrespective of an individual's family history of cancer. Molecular analysis of tumors in those with metastatic disease is also recommended. We aimed to determine rates of genetic testing at our institution, factors associated with testing, and outcomes of those tested. METHODS: Frequency of GL and somatic testing was examined in pts diagnosed with non-endocrine PC, with >2 visits between June 2019 and June 2021 at the Mount Sinai Health System. The clinicopathological variables and treatment outcomes were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 149 pts met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-six pts (44%) underwent GL testing: 42 (28%) at time of diagnosis with the remainder later in treatment. The rate of GL testing increased every year: 33% (2019), 44% (2020), and 61% (2021). A family history of cancer was the only variable associated with the decision to perform GL testing. Eight pts (12% of pts tested) had pathological gMut: BRCA1 (1), BRCA2 (1), ATM (2), PALB2 (2), NTHL1 (1), both CHEK2 and APC (1). Neither gBRCA pt received a PARP inhibitor, all except one received first-line platinum. Ninety-eight pts (65.7%) had molecular tumor testing (66.7% of patients with metastases). Two pts with BRCA2 somatic mut did not have GL testing. Three pts received targeted therapies. CONCLUSION: Genetic testing based on provider discretion results in low rates of GL testing. Early results of genetic testing can have an impact on treatment decisions and trajectory of disease. Initiatives to increase testing are needed but must be feasible in real-world clinic settings.

Distress, Depression, and the Effect of ZIP Code in Pancreaticobiliary Cancer Patients and Their Significant Others.

BACKGROUND: Distress screening of cancer patients is mandated by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer. Clinical implementation remains limited, particularly in surgical oncology settings in individuals with pancreaticobiliary cancers. STUDY DESIGN: This study evaluated differences in mean distress scores based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer & Problem List for patients with pancreaticobiliary cancers, benign pancreatic conditions, and for their significant others (SOs). The distress screening was conducted at the first office visit and postoperatively in a subset of those who had surgery. Distress Thermometer (DT) scores were dichotomized at ≤5 vs >5 and at ≥7 and correlated with Problem List items. The US ZIP Code database was used to correlate income range, percent poverty, and unemployment in the patient's self-identified ZIP code. Regression models were fitted to identify independent predictors of distress. RESULTS: A total of 547 patients and 184 SOs were evaluated. Thirty percent of patients had DT scores >5, with pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients reporting the highest levels of distress. SOs of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients reported even greater distress than the patients themselves. As the number of pre-existing medical problems increased; so did DT scores. Distress correlated with physical and emotional problems and worry about insurance coverage and transportation. Higher income level predicted higher DT scores, although poverty predicted lower DT scores. Depression was present in 12% of the patients. Distress improved in those undergoing surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Distress and depression in pancreaticobiliary cancer patients and SOs are prevalent. The findings of this study have multiple actionable implications and require diagnosis, treatment, and referral to supportive care resources.

Liposome-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications for pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the harshest and most challenging cancers to treat, often labeled as incurable. Chemotherapy continues to be the most popular treatment yet yields a very poor prognosis. The main barriers such as inefficient drug penetration and drug resistance, have led to the development of drug carrier systems. The benefits, ease of fabrication and modification of liposomes render them as ideal future drug delivery systems. This review delves into the versatility of liposomes to achieve various mechanisms of treatment for pancreatic cancer. Not only are there benefits of loading chemotherapy drugs and targeting agents onto liposomes, as well as mRNA combined therapy, but liposomes have also been exploited for immunotherapy and can be programmed to respond to photothermal therapy. Multifunctional liposomal formulations have demonstrated significant pre-clinical success. Functionalising drug-encapsulated liposomes has resulted in triggered drug release, specific targeting, and remodeling of the tumor environment. Suppressing tumor progression has been achieved, due to their ability to more efficiently and precisely deliver chemotherapy. Currently, no multifunctional surface-modified liposomes are clinically approved for pancreatic cancer thus we aim to shed light on the trials and tribulations and progress so far, with the hope for liposomal therapy in the future and improved patient outcomes. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Considering that conventional treatments for pancreatic cancer are highly associated with sub-optimal performance and systemic toxicity, the development of novel therapeutic strategies holds outmost relevance for pancreatic cancer management. Liposomes are being increasingly considered as promising nanocarriers for providing not only an early diagnosis but also effective, highly specific, and safer treatment, improving overall patient outcome. This manuscript is the first in the last 10 years that revises the advances in the application of liposome-based formulations in bioimaging, chemotherapy, phototherapy, immunotherapy, combination therapies, and emergent therapies for pancreatic cancer management. Prospective insights are provided regarding several advantages resulting from the use of liposome technology in precision strategies, fostering new ideas for next-generation diagnosis and targeted therapies of pancreatic cancer.

Compliance with the Current NCCN Guidelines and Its Critical Role in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Since 2019, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has recommended genetic testing for patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma that includes universal germline testing and tumor gene profiling for metastatic, locally advanced, or recurrent disease. However, testing compliance with this guideline has not yet been published in the English literature. METHODS: A quality assurance/quality improvement retrospective review was done to identify patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma from January 2019 to February 2021 to include the patient's clinical status and genetic test results. RESULTS: There were 20 patient cases identified with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A total of 11 cases had molecular tumor gene profiling and microsatellite instability/mismatch repair (MSI/MMR) testing performed and 1 case had only MSI/MMR testing by immunohistochemistry performed. Only 3 patients of the 20 in total received germline testing. CONCLUSION: There was a significant number of patients for whom tumor gene profiling or germline testing had never been attempted as per recommended NCCN guidelines.

Successful conversion surgery after FOLFIRINOX therapy in a patient with advanced pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma with a solitary peritoneal dissemination: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma is rare; it accounts for 1% of all malignant pancreatic exocrine tumors. Although surgical resection is an option for curative treatment, the safety and efficacy of conversion surgery in patients with pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma with metastasis remain unknown. CASE: A 67-year-old man with epigastric pain and a pancreatic tumor was referred to our hospital. Computed tomography revealed a large tumor with a maximum diameter of 67 mm at the pancreatic head and a 23-mm mass in the left upper abdominal cavity. Because a definitive diagnosis could not be made based on endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy findings, a diagnostic laparoscopy was performed. The tumor in the greater omentum at the left upper abdomen, resected under laparoscopy, was histopathologically diagnosed as pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma. Therefore, the pancreatic tumor was diagnosed as an unresectable pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma with a solitary peritoneal dissemination. The size of the main pancreatic tumor decreased to 15 mm after 18 courses of FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin). Subsequently, the patient underwent conversion surgery, and the initial diagnosis of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma was confirmed on pathological examination. The patient was discharged 31 days postoperatively, following which he received adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1. No sign of recurrence has been observed for 32 months after surgical resection. CONCLUSION: FOLFIRINOX may be effective in patients with pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma, and conversion surgery after FOLFIRINOX may be applicable to selective patients.

Insulinoma: an uncommon cause of delirium.

We present the case of an 83-year-old woman with recurrent episodes of delirium occurring overnight, associated with hypoglycaemia. Other causes for delirium were excluded. Laboratory findings were in keeping with endogenous insulin production. Computerised tomography imaging revealed a small mass in the pancreas supporting a presumed diagnosis of an insulinoma. Given the patient's frailty and cognitive impairment, a conservative management approach was taken. Diazoxide was commenced with resolution of episodes of delirium. This case highlights hypoglycaemia, and insulinoma, as a rare, but treatable cause of delirium. It demonstrates the importance of blood sugar screening in delirium. It emphasises the holistic modifications to management, which must be taken to ensure patient-centred care when caring for an older adult living with frailty, who may have cognitive impairment.

Intake of Calcium, Magnesium, and Phosphorus and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

ObjectiveFew epidemiological studies have investigated the associations between calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus intake and pancreatic cancer. We examined these associations in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.MethodsDiet was assessed using the Dietary Questionnaire (DQX) at baseline in the intervention arm and the Dietary History Questionnaire (DHQ) in 1999 or around the third anniversary of randomization in both the intervention and control arms. During a median follow-up of 12.2 years, 279 cases of pancreatic cancer occurred from 58,477 participants who completed DQX; 380 cases arose from 101,622 participants who responded to DHQ over a median follow-up of 8.9 years. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsTotal calcium intake was inversely associated with pancreatic cancer [HR (95% CI) for the fourth vs. the first quartiles in the DHQ cohort: 0.67 (0.47, 0.96); p-trend: 0.035]. An inverse association was also observed for total magnesium intake [HR (95% CI) for the fourth vs. the first quartiles in the DQX cohort: 0.61 (0.37, 1.00); p-trend: 0.023]. Reduced risk associated with total calcium intake was confined to subjects with a high fat intake (>73 g/day) in the DHQ cohort (p-interaction: 0.16).ConclusionsThere was not a significant association between dietary phosphorus intake and pancreatic cancer risk in both cohorts. Total intake of calcium and magnesium are associated with a lower pancreatic cancer risk. The effect of total calcium intake was modified by fat intake.

Management recommendations for pancreatic manifestations of von Hippel-Lindau disease.

Von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) is a multineoplasm inherited disease manifesting with hemangioblastoma of the central nervous system and retina, adrenal pheochromocytoma, renal cell carcinoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and cysts, and neoplasms/cysts of the ear, broad ligament, and testicles. During 2018-2020, the VHL Alliance gathered several committees of experts in the various clinical manifestations of VHL to review the literature, gather the available evidence on VHL, and develop recommendations for patient management. The current report details the results of the discussion of a group of experts in the pancreatic manifestations of VHL along with their proposed recommendations for the clinical surveillance and management of patients with VHL. The recommendations subcommittee performed a comprehensive systematic review of the literature and conducted panel discussions to reach the current recommendations. The level of evidence was defined according to the Shekelle variation of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation grading system. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Categories of Evidence and Consensus defined the committee members' interpretation of the evidence and degree of consensus. The recommendations encompass the main aspects of VHL-related pancreatic manifestations and their clinical management. They are presented in a clinical orientation, including general planning of screening and surveillance for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, utility of biochemical biomarkers, the optimal choice for imaging modality, indirect risk stratification, indications for tissue sampling of VHL-related pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and interventions. These recommendations are designed to serve as the reference for all aspects of the screening, surveillance, and management of VHL-related pancreatic manifestations.

Índice pronóstico nutricional en pacientes con cáncer de páncreas avanzado tratados con nimotuzumab combinado a quimioterapia / Nutritional prognostic index in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with nimotuzumab combined with chemotherapy

Introducción: El índice pronóstico nutricional es un marcador inmuno-nutricional que puede ser útil como factor pronóstico en tumores gastrointestinales. Objetivo: Evaluar supervivencia de pacientes con adenocarcinoma pancreático avanzado tratados con quimioinmunoterapia según índice pronóstico nutricional, según parámetros clínico-patológicos y tratamiento. Métodos: Se realizó estudio retrospectivo y observacional en pacientes que recibieron quimioterapia gemcitabina-oxaliplatino combinado a nimotuzumab (n=118), en el Hospital Ameijeiras, entre 2014 y 2019. Se evaluó supervivencia por método Kaplan-Meier, y regresión de Cox, para determinar los factores pronósticos independientes de supervivencia. Resultados: El punto de corte seleccionado fue 40 (sensibilidad 52,9 por ciento y especificidad 85,7 por ciento (p = 0,019), con área bajo la curva de 0,693. Para pacientes con índice menor de 40, la supervivencia fue más baja respecto a los pacientes con índice ≥ 40 (11,4 meses frente a 16,0 meses; p=0,001), con un HR de 1,7 (1,13-2,60; p=0,011). Las variables mayormente asociadas con índice pronóstico nutricional altos son pacientes con sesenta años o menos; ECOG cero, índice de masa corporal ≥25 Kg/m2 y albúmina sérica >3,5g/dL (x² < 0,05). Los pacientes con índice ≥ 40 tienen medianas de supervivencia más altas que pacientes con índice < 40 en las variables seleccionadas con p < 0,05, excepto el índice de masa corporal. Conclusiones: Este trabajo constituye el primer reporte nacional de utilización del índice pronóstico nutricional como pronóstico de supervivencia en pacientes con cáncer de páncreas avanzado(AU)

Background: The nutritional prognostic index is an immuno-nutritional marker that can be useful as a prognostic factor in gastrointestinal tumors. Aim: To evaluate the survival of patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with chemoimmunotherapy according to the nutritional prognostic index, according to clinical-pathological parameters and treatment. Methods: A retrospective and observational study was carried out in patients who received gemcitabine-oxaliplatin chemotherapy combined with nimotuzumab (n=118), at the Ameijeiras Hospital, between 2014 and 2019. Survival was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression, for determine independent prognostic factors for survival. Results: The selected cut-off point was 40 (52.9 percent sensitivity and 85.7 percent specificity) (p=0,019), with an area under the curve of 0,693. For patients with an index less than 40, survival was lower compared to patients with index ≥ 40 (11, 4 months vs. 16, 0 months; p=0,001), with a HR of 1, 7 (1, 13-2, 60; p=0,011). The variables mostly associated with nutritional prognostic index patients with 60 years or less, ECOG 0, body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 and serum albumin >3,5g/dL (x2 < 0, 05). Patients with index ≥ 40 have higher median survival than patients with index < 40 in the selected variables with p < 0, 05, except body mass index. Conclusions: This work constitutes the first national report on the use of the nutritional prognostic index as a prognosis of survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer(AU)

Implications of Multigene Panel Testing on Psychosocial Outcomes: A Comparison of Patients With Pancreatic and Breast or Ovarian Cancer.

PURPOSE: National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for germline genetic testing have included pancreatic cancer in the context of additional family cancer history for many years but this was not recommended for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) independent of a family history until 2019. This hypothesis-generating study reports the results from multigene panel testing for PDAC patients at an academic medical center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective longitudinal feasibility study examined responses to genetic counseling and multigene panel testing among PDAC and breast or ovarian cancer (BrOv) patients between October 2016 and November 2017. Pre- and post-test surveys assessed perceptions of genetic risk and testing, recall, comprehension, and emotional reactions to results using open-ended and closed-ended items. RESULTS: Forty-six BrOv and 33 PDAC patients were enrolled, and 44 BrOv and 31 PDAC participants underwent genetic testing. Seven pathogenic variants were identified in six BrOv participants (13.6%), and three pathogenic variants were identified in three PDAC participants (9.7%). The majority of both cohorts expressed similar attitudes about the importance of genetic testing for their personal and family medical management and expressed accurate understanding of implications of their results. Although sample size was small, there were no significant differences between the BrOv and PDAC cohorts for positive or negative emotions. CONCLUSION: This study points to high rates of positive emotions and low rates of negative emotions following genetic test results, suggesting that the emotional reactions to genetic test results are similar for patients with BrOv and PDAC, despite poor prognosis with PDAC diagnoses. Because of the unique needs of the PDAC population following diagnosis, a multidisciplinary approach to germline genetic testing following diagnosis may result in best patient and family member outcomes.

A germline c.1546dupC MEN1 mutation in an MEN1 family: A case report.

RATIONALE: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare tumor syndrome with an autosomal dominant inheritance, and genetic testing for MEN1 gene is important for both affected individuals and their relatives. We present a 2-person family affected by a germline c.1546dupC MEN1 mutation, and one of them had a full-spectrum of MEN-related endocrine tumors. PATIENT CONCERNS: A female patient aged 32 years presented with jejunal ulcer perforation due to gastrinoma. DIAGNOSES: We conducted genetic analysis and extensive biochemical/radiological evaluation for detecting other endocrine tumors. Multiple pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), prolactinoma and primary hyperparathyroidism were diagnosed, and a frame-shift mutation, NM_130799.1:c.1546dupC (p.Arg516Profs∗15), was detected. One daughter of the proband, aged 12 years, had the same mutation for MEN1. INTERVENTION: She underwent pancreatic surgery for pancreatic NETs and total parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. OUTCOMES: After pancreatic surgery, long-term symptoms of epigastric soreness, acid belching, sweating, and palpitation in fasting were improved. Hypercalcemia was improved after parathyroidectomy and she was supplemented with oral calcium and vitamin D. Her daughter showed normal biochemical surveillance until 15 years of age. LESSONS: We report 2 people in a family affected by MEN1 with the heterozygous germline c.1546dupC mutation, a variant that should be surveilled for early development of full-blown MEN1-associated endocrine tumors.

Carcinoma pseudopapilar sólido del páncreas / Solid pseudo-papillary carcinoma of the pancreas

El tumor sólido pseudopapilar del páncreas, conocido también como tumor de Frantz, es una enfermedad rara: neoplasia bien delimitada, de lento crecimiento, no agresiva pero maligna, habitualmente con pronóstico favorable. El tratamiento de elección es quirúrgico. Aunque algunos de ellos son agresivos a nivel local, la mayoría de los pacientes se curan con la resección completa del tumor. Se reportó el caso de una mujer de 30 años, ingresada en el Servicio de Cirugía General del Hospital Universitario Clínico Quirúrgico Comandante Faustino Pérez Hernández, con diagnóstico presuntivo clínico e imagenológico, de tumor pseudopapilar sólido del páncreas, con confirmación histológica tras la resección quirúrgica. Este infrecuente tumor debe ser considerado en el diagnóstico diferencial de los tumores pancreáticos, fundamentalmente en mujeres jóvenes(AU)

The solid pseudo-papillary carcinoma, also known as Frantz´s tumor, is a rare disease. It is a well-defined neoplasia, of low growth, non-aggressive but malignant, usually with a favorable prognosis. The elective treatment is the surgery. Although some of them are locally aggressive, most patients are healed with the complete tumor resection. The authors reported the case of a woman, aged 30 years who entered the Service of General Surgery of the University Hospital Comandante Faustino Pérez Hernández, with a presumptive clinical and imaging diagnosis of pancreas solid pseudo-papillary tumor, histologically confirmed after surgical resection. This infrequent tumor should be taken into account in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors, mainly in young women(AU)

Inherited predisposition to pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is projected to be the second leading cause of cancer death in the US by 2030. There are multiple germline pathogenic variants and cancer syndromes associated with an increased risk of PDAC. Precision treatment, informed by germline genetic testing and molecular tumor analysis, can optimize therapeutic regimens and outcomes for those diagnosed with PDAC. As a result, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network currently recommends genetic testing for all newly diagnosed PDAC patients given the clinical implications for treatment but also for the identification of at-risk family members who can benefit from pancreatic cancer screening and other cancer prevention strategies. This article reviews inherited risk factors for the development of PDAC and current screening strategies for the early detection of PDAC in high-risk populations.

Predictive factors for long-term survival after surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Making a case for standardized reporting of the resection margin using certified cancer center data.

Factors for overall survival after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) seem to be nodal status, chemotherapy administration, UICC staging, and resection margin. However, there is no consensus on the definition for tumor free resection margin. Therefore, univariate OS as well as multivariate long-term survival using cancer center data was analyzed with regards to two different resection margin definitions. Ninety-five patients met inclusion criteria (pancreatic head PDAC, R0/R1, no 30 days mortality). OS was analyzed in univariate analysis with respect to R-status, CRM (circumferential resection margin; positive: ≤1mm; negative: >1mm), nodal status, and chemotherapy administration. Long-term survival >36 months was modelled using multivariate logistic regression instead of Cox regression because the distribution function of the dependent data violated the requirements for the application of this test. Significant differences in OS were found regarding the R status (Median OS and 95%CI for R0: 29.8 months, 22.3-37.4; R1: 15.9 months, 9.2-22.7; p = 0.005), nodal status (pN0 = 34.7, 10.4-59.0; pN1 = 17.1, 11.5-22.8; p = 0.003), and chemotherapy (with CTx: 26.7, 20.4-33.0; without CTx: 9.7, 5.2-14.1; p < .001). OS according to CRM status differed on a clinically relevant level by about 12 months (CRM positive: 17.2 months, 11.5-23.0; CRM negative: 29.8 months, 18.6-41.1; p = 0.126). A multivariate model containing chemotherapy, nodal status, and CRM explained long-term survival (p = 0.008; correct prediction >70%). Chemotherapy, nodal status and resection margin according to UICC R status are univariate factors for OS after PDAC. In contrast, long-term survival seems to depend on wider resection margins than those used in UICC R classification. Therefore, standardized histopathological reporting (including resection margin size) should be agreed upon.

Contemporary management of pancreas cancer in older people.

As the population of western countries is aging, the number of patients diagnosed with cancer is growing. Therefore older people, more susceptible to develop pancreatic malignancy, will likely represent the prototype of a pancreatic cancer patient in the near future. Diagnostic modalities utilised for younger patients are also applicable for older individuals. There is accumulative evidence that biological age is not an independent factor predicting poor outcome in elderly patients with resectable disease undergoing surgery, however increased postoperative morbidity and mortality within the elderly group has also been reported. Adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered in all patients with good performance status regardless of their age. Palliative measures for unresectable tumours including relief from biliary and duodenal obstruction as well as chemotherapy should be considered in non-frail patients with reasonable life expectancy. Palliative chemotherapy options are FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for patients with good performance status (0-1) and gemcitabine alone for patients with performance status 2-3. The cornerstone for improving the outcomes of the elderly age group is careful patient selection and perioperative optimization of those who have indication for surgery. Patients and their carers should be involved in the decision making process with emphasis on the expected functional recovery after the proposed treatment modality. The presence of geriatricians in the multidisciplinary team meetings is crucial in order to identify the optimal treatment pathway for elderly patients. Geriatric input regarding peri-habilitation pathways to improve surgical outcomes, to decrease mortality and to expedite patients' functional recovery is highly recommended.

Validation of the Enriching New-Onset Diabetes for Pancreatic Cancer Model in a Diverse and Integrated Healthcare Setting.

BACKGROUND: The risk of pancreatic cancer is elevated among people with new-onset diabetes (NOD). Based on Rochester Epidemiology Project Data, the Enriching New-Onset Diabetes for Pancreatic Cancer (END-PAC) model was developed and validated. AIMS: We validated the END-PAC model in a cohort of patients with NOD using retrospectively collected data from a large integrated health maintenance organization. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients between 50 and 84 years of age meeting the criteria for NOD in 2010-2014 was identified. Each patient was assigned a risk score (< 1: low risk; 1-2: intermediate risk; ≥ 3: high risk) based on the values of the predictors specified in the END-PAC model. Patients who developed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) within 3 years were identified using the Cancer Registry and California State Death files. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were estimated. RESULTS: Out of the 13,947 NOD patients who were assigned a risk score, 99 developed PDAC in 3 years (0.7%). Of the 3038 patients who had a high risk, 62 (2.0%) developed PDAC in 3 years. The risk increased to 3.0% in white patients with a high risk. The AUC was 0.75. At the 3+ threshold, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 62.6%, 78.5%, 2.0%, and 99.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It is critical that prediction models are validated before they are implemented in various populations and clinical settings. More efforts are needed to develop screening strategies most appropriate for patients with NOD in real-world settings.

Impact of Margin Status on Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Historically, a positive margin after pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was associated with decreased survival. In an era when neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is being used frequently, the prognostic significance of margin status is unclear. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with localized PDAC who received NAC and underwent pancreatectomy from 2011 to 2018 were identified from a single-institution database. Patients with fewer than 2 months of NAC, R2 resection, or fewer than 90 days of follow-up were excluded. A positive margin included tumors within 1 mm of the surgical margin. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 65 years and 53% were female. Preoperative clinical staging demonstrated that most had locally advanced (n = 222 [47%]) or borderline resectable (n = 172 [37%]) disease. Median follow-up was 18.5 months (interquartile range 10.6 to 30.0 months). Median duration of NAC was 119 days (interquartile range 87 to 168 days). FOLFIRINOX was first-line therapy for 67%, and 73% received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Most underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (69%). Forty percent were node-positive and 80% had an R0 resection. Fifty-six percent received at least 1 cycle of adjuvant therapy. Median overall survival and recurrence-free survival were 22.0 months (95% CI, 19.4 to 25.1 months) and 11.0 months (95% CI, 10.0 to 12.1 months). On multivariate analysis, margin status was not a significant predictor of overall survival or recurrence-free survival. Factors associated with overall survival included clinical stage, duration of NAC, nodal status, histopathologic treatment response score, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Microscopic margin positivity is not associated with recurrence and survival in localized PDAC patients resected after treatment with NAC. Aggressive surgical extirpation in high-volume centers should be considered in selected patients after extensive NAC.