RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Thoracic-cancer (TC) patients have an extensive toll taken in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQL). Integrative Oncology (IO) is recognized as a valid complement to any Standard-Therapy treatment to improve outcomes in TC patients. The objective of this pilot-study was to evaluate the effect of adding IO (acupuncture, Cognitive-Behavior Therapy and mindfulness) in terms of depression, anxiety and HRQL. METHODS: TC patients who attended the Thoracic Oncology-Unit from July to September 2018 were invited to participate. A total of 16 patients were included in the study, 8 patients were required to attend 5 weekly sessions of IO and 8 patients were invited as controls. Anxiety, depression and HRQL were measured at baseline and after completing 5 sessions of IO or 5 weeks, using the HADS scale and the QLQ-C30 scale. RESULTS: A total of 8 patients in the IO group attended the 5 sessions and 8 patients were followed as controls. Compliance with the therapies was high, none of the patients dropped out from the study. A tendency for improvement in anxiety, fatigue, pain and dyspnea was observed in patients attending IO, though not statistically significant likely due to sample size. CONCLUSIONS: IO therapies are well accepted among TC patients. Larger studies are necessary with robust sample sizes to improve conclusions regarding outcome improvements.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/terapia , Oncología Integrativa , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Neoplasias Torácicas , Depresión/terapia , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Neoplasias Torácicas/psicología , Neoplasias Torácicas/terapiaRESUMEN
The recent development in optimising palliative care standards in thoracic oncology is associated with an increased demand in specialized communication skills. Standardised and integrated assessments of the palliative care need of the patient is met by limited health care resources. The model of communication described in this article emphasizes the need to structure palliative distress assessment of the patient. Communication pathways are shown as a platform to evaluate and support patient and caregivers. Standards to establish algorithms of communication in palliative care will improve the very important interaction between patient and caregivers.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Modelos Organizacionales , Cuidados Paliativos/organización & administración , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Estrés Psicológico/terapia , Neoplasias Torácicas/terapia , Cuidadores/psicología , Comunicación en Salud , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Cuidado Terminal/organización & administración , Cuidado Terminal/psicología , Neoplasias Torácicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Torácicas/psicología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use has been increasing among cancer patients. This study characterizes the use of CAM among patients with thoracic malignancies. METHODS: This cross sectional study was conducted at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center among adult patients diagnosed with thoracic malignancies. The primary outcome was a self-reported use of CAM, defined as the use of any type of CAM beyond routine vitamin/mineral supplementation alone. A logistic regression model was developed to explore predictors of CAM use. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients completed a standardized survey (59% response rate). Overall, 42% of respondents reported the use of at least one type of CAM. Users and non-users of CAM did not differ based upon demographics, diagnosis, staging, smoking status, quality of life, or perceived understanding of cancer diagnosis. In the multivariate analysis, patients who reported feeling fearful about their future were four times more likely to be CAM users when compared to those who did not specify this emotion (odds ratio=4.18; 95% CI=1.23-14.12; p=0.02). Commonly cited reasons for CAM use were to support one's self, boost immunity, and for improvements in emotional and/or spiritual well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of CAM use among cancer patients in this study was similar to the general US population. Feeling fearful about the future was associated with CAM use. Results suggest that patients may be turning to CAM as a therapeutic adjunct to actively cope with emotional distress surrounding the cancer experience.
Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Torácicas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapias Complementarias/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motivación , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Autoinforme , Neoplasias Torácicas/psicología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a group intervention including hypnosis can reduce cancer pain and trait hypnotizability would moderate these effects. DESIGN: This randomized clinical trial examined the effects of group therapy with hypnosis (supportive-expressive group therapy) plus education compared to an education-only control condition on pain over 12 months among 124 women with metastatic breast cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain and suffering, frequency of pain, and degree of constant pain were assessed at baseline and 4-month intervals. Those in the treatment group also reported on their experiences using the hypnosis exercises. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analyses indicated that the intervention resulted in significantly less increase in the intensity of pain and suffering over time, compared to the education-only group, but had no significant effects on the frequency of pain episodes or amount of constant pain, and there was no interaction of the intervention with hypnotizability. Within the intervention group, highly hypnotizable participants, compared to those less hypnotizable, reported greater benefits from hypnosis, employed self-hypnosis more often outside of group, and used it to manage other symptoms in addition to pain. CONCLUSION: These results augment the growing literature supporting the use of hypnosis as an adjunctive treatment for medical patients experiencing pain.