Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy to Treat Pseudomyxoma Peritonei of Ovarian Origin: A Retrospective French RENAPE Group Study.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian pseudomyxoma peritonei (OPMP) are rare, without well-defined therapeutic guidelines. We aimed to evaluate cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to treat OPMP. METHODS: Patients from the French National Network for Rare Peritoneal Tumors (RENAPE) database with proven OPMP treated by CRS/HIPEC and with histologically normal appendix and digestive endoscopy were retrospectively included. Clinical and follow-up data were collected. Histopathological and immunohistochemical features were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with a median age of 56 years were included. The median Peritoneal Cancer Index was 16. Following CRS, the completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score was CC-0 for 9/15 (60%) patients, CC-1 for 5/15 (33.3%) patients, and CC-2 for 1/15 (6.7%) patients. The median tumor size was 22.5 cm. After pathological review and immunohistochemical studies, tumors were classified as Group 1 (mucinous ovarian epithelial neoplasms) in 3/15 (20%) patients; Group 2 (mucinous neoplasm in ovarian teratoma) in 4/15 (26.7%) patients; Group 3 (mucinous neoplasm probably arising in ovarian teratoma) in 5/15 (33.3%) patients; and Group 4 (non-specific group) in 3/15 (20%) patients. Peritoneal lesions were OPMP pM1a/acellular, pM1b/grade 1 (hypocellular) and pM1b/grade 3 (signet-ring cells) in 13/15 (86.7%), 1/15 (6.7%) and 1/15 (6.7%) patients, respectively. Disease-free survival analysis showed a difference (p = 0.0463) between OPMP with teratoma/likely-teratoma origin (groups 2 and 3; 100% at 1, 5, and 10 years), and other groups (groups 1 and 4; 100%, 66.6%, and 50% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results suggested that a primary therapeutic strategy using complete CRS/HIPEC for patients with OPMP led to favorable long-term outcomes.

[Surgical treatment for recurrent intra-abdominal mucinous neoplasms]. / Chirurgische Therapie im Rezidivfall bei intraabdominellen muzinösen Neoplasien.

BACKGROUND: The gold standard in the treatment of mucinous intra-abdominal neoplasms is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Despite complete cytoreduction up to 45% of patients develop recurrences. METHOD: A search and analysis of the current literature were carried out. RESULTS: There is still controversy regarding the best treatment strategy for patients with recurrent pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) after CRS and HIPEC. The clinical management of these patients depends on many factors, such as the site and volume of recurrence, histological subtype and symptoms. Treatment options range from repeated surgery with curative intent with or without HIPEC to watch and wait strategies. In selected patients redo surgery is feasible and safe with low morbidity and mortality. Iterative complete CRS can result in a median 5­year overall survival of more than 80%. Debulking surgery leads to a prolonged survival and to symptom control fora period with of nearly 2 years. CONCLUSION: Repeated complete cytoreduction of recurrent PMP can result in long-term survival. Tumor debulking surgery may be particularly beneficial for symptomatic patients.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Peritoneal Chemotherapy in Appendiceal and Colorectal Cancer: Outcomes and Survival.

BACKGROUND: We reviewed outcomes following cytoreductive surgery/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with appendiceal or colorectal neoplasms and evaluated key prognostic indicators for treatment. METHODS: All patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery/HIPEC for appendiceal and colorectal neoplasms were identified from an IRB-approved database. Patient demographics, operative reports, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: 110 patients [median age 54.5 (18-79) years, 55% male] were included. Primary tumor location was colorectal (58; 52.7%) and appendiceal (52; 47.3%). 28.2%, .9%, and 12.7% had right, left, and sigmoid tumors, respectively; 11.8% had rectal tumors. 12/13 rectal cancer patients underwent preoperative radiotherapy. Mean Peritoneal Cancer Index was 9.6 ± 7.7; complete cytoreduction was achieved in 90.9%. 53.6% developed postoperative complications. Reoperation, perioperative mortality, and 30-day readmission rates were 1.8%, .09%, and 13.6%, respectively. Recurrence at a median of 11.1 months was 48.2%; overall survival at 1 and 2 years was 84% and 56.8%, respectively; disease-free survival was 60.8% and 33.7%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 16.8 (0-86.8) months. Univariate analysis of preoperative chemotherapy, primary malignancy location, primary tumor perforated or obstructive, postoperative bleeding complication, and pathology of adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma and negative lymph nodes were identified as possible predictive factors of survival. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative chemotherapy (P < .001), perforated tumor (P = .003), and postoperative intra-abdominal bleeding (P < .001) were independent prognostic indicators for survival. CONCLUSIONS: Cytoreductive surgery/HIPEC for colorectal and appendiceal neoplasms has low mortality and high completeness of cytoreduction score. Preoperative chemotherapy, primary tumor perforation, and postoperative bleeding are adverse risk factors for survival.

Prolonged Survival in Peritoneal Metastatic Appendiceal Carcinoma Patients Treated With Combined Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Primary treatment for peritoneal dissemination of appendiceal cancer is the combination of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The endpoints were overall survival and evaluation of prognostic factors. METHODS: Clinicopathological and treatment-related factors were obtained from a prospective database. A total of 84 patients, 55 (65%) primary and 29 (35%) recurrent malignant appendiceal carcinomas with synchronous and metachronous peritoneal metastases, underwent multimodal treatment between 2011 and 2021. The endpoints of the study were overall survival and evaluation of prognostic factors. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 4.8 y; the mean age was 54.5 y (range 25-77), with a sex distribution of 69% female and 31% male. The mean peritoneal cancer index was 11.3. The proportion of mucinous, intestinal-type, signet ring cell, and goblet cell carcinoma was 56%, 23%, 11%, and 10%, respectively. The 5-y survival rate of the whole cohort was 56.7%. In primary and recurrent diseases, the overall median survival was 8.4 and 4.9 y. Significantly improved survival was detected after complete cytoreduction resection (hazard ratio [HR] for CCR-2 versus CCR-0: 9.388, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.026-29.124, P = 0.001) and initial local operation with undelayed admission to the center (HR 0.262, 95% CI 0.089-0.773; P = 0.015). The five independent factors in Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariable Cox regression analysis associated with significant adverse survival were cancer antigen (CA) 19-9 over 37 IU/mL, signet ring cell and intestinal-type histology, positive nodal status, grading, and peritoneal cancer index >20. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy administration did not impact survival (HR 1.220, 95% CI 0.612-2.432, P = 0.571). CONCLUSIONS: With multimodal treatment, prolonged survival is attainable in stage IV primary and recurrent appendiceal carcinoma with peritoneal dissemination. Direct referral to specialized centers after confirmation of peritoneal metastasis is recommended because prompt definitive treatment may significantly improve survival.

Development and Validation of Nomograms to Predict Survival in Patients Undergoing Complete Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Pseudomyxoma Peritonei of Appendiceal Origin.

Importance: Pseudomyxoma peritoni, a rare condition characterized by mucinous ascites and peritoneal deposits, mainly originates from a ruptured mucinous appendix tumor and is considered an indolent disease but can progress and become fatal. Optimal treatment to improve cure and survival rates involves complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Accurate predictive models are useful in supporting and informing treatment strategies and stratifying patient follow-up. Objective: To evaluate the prognostic significance of clinically important variables and generate validated nomograms to predict overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) following CCRS and hyperthermic intraperitoneal HIPEC for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) of appendiceal origin. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective study used prospectively collected data on patients who had cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC in a single institution between 1994 and 2018. The cohort was randomly allocated into development (70%) and validation (30%) sets. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with Cox proportional hazards regression. Main Outcomes and Measures: A prediction model was developed with significant prognostic factors identified by multivariate analysis. The model's prognostic performance was evaluated with the concordance index (C index). The nomogram was calibrated by comparing the predicted and observed probabilities. Results: Of 2637 CRS and HIPEC operations, 1102 patients (female, 64.4%; median age [IQR], 57.0 [48.0-66.0] years) (41.8%) had CCRS for PMP of appendiceal origin. Elevated tumor markers, peritoneal carcinomatosis index, gastrectomy, and tumor grade were independent predictive factors for DFS. Gender, age, elevated tumor makers, peritoneal carcinomatosis index, and tumor grade influenced OS. The nomograms were generated with respective prognostic factors. The nomograms showed good performance in predicting survival. Median OS of the cohort was 16.5 years (95% CI, 13.7-19.2) with a 5-year probability of survival of 80.2%. The median DFS was 10.3 years (95% CI, 7.2- 13.3) and the 5-year probability of recurrence-free survival was 60.5%. Conclusions and Relevance: Clinically important independent predictors for survival and recurrence were selected to develop the nomograms for OS and DFS. These 2 nomograms are user friendly and useful tools for patient management with clinical trial design applications.

Cholecystoappendiceal Fistula From Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma Requiring a Right Hemicolectomy With Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Bilioenteric fistulae are rare and difficult to manage complications of chronic cholecystitis. While cholecystoduodenal and cholecystocolic fistulae are more common, a cholecystoappendiceal fistula is an extremely rare finding. We report the presentation and operative management of a 59-year-old male with cholecystoappendiceal fistula and associated abscess in the gallbladder fossa. The patient was appropriately resuscitated, the abscess drained by interventional radiology, and after a complete workup, underwent a laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy. Pathology revealed moderately differentiated appendiceal adenocarcinoma requiring a right hemicolectomy with cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). He has recovered well postoperatively with no complications. This case highlights the importance of having a very high index of suspicion for underlying malignancy when managing a fistula of any kind. To the best of our understanding, this is only the second reported case of a cholecystoappendiceal fistula.

Mutational profiles and prognostic impact in colorectal and high-grade appendiceal adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastases.

BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) personalizes cancer treatments. In this study, we analyze outcomes based on NGS testing for colorectal cancer (CRC) and high-grade appendiceal adenocarcinoma (HGA) with peritoneal metastases. METHODS: Retrospective review of genomic analyses and outcomes in patients with CRC or HGA with peritoneal metastases at a high-volume center from 2012 to 2019. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients (57 CRC, 35 HGA) were identified. Overall survival was longer for CRC (52.8 vs. 30.5 months, p = 0.03), though rates of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) were similar. Multiple genes were more frequently mutated in CRC, including KRAS (51% vs. 29%, p = 0.04), TP53 (47% vs. 20%, p < 0.01), and APC (46% vs. 6%, p < 0.01). For CRC, multivariate regression showed an increased hazard ratio (HR) with increasing peritoneal cancer index (1.06 [1.01-1.11], p = 0.02) and a decreased HR following CRS/HIPEC (0.30 [0.11-0.80], p = 0.02). PIK3CA mutation associated with significantly increased HR (3.62 [1.06-12.41], p = 0.04), though only in non-CRS/HIPEC patients. Multivariate analysis in the HGA group showed a benefit following CRS/HIPEC (0.18 [0.06-0.61], p = 0.01) and for mucinous disease (0.38 [0.15-0.96], p = 0.04), while there was an increased HR with TP53 mutation (6.89 [2.12-22.44], p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: CRC and HGA with peritoneal spread have distinct mutational profiles. PIK3CA and TP53 mutations are associated with survival for CRC or HGA with peritoneal metastases, respectively.

Comparing Survival Outcomes and Impact of EPIC in Patients Undergoing CRS/HIPEC for Mucinous Appendiceal Neoplasm.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study sought to investigate the difference in survival outcomes in patients with complete cytoreduction (CC)-0 or CC-1 mucinous appendiceal cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). It also investigated what effect early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) may have on survival based on CC score and histology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective single centre study of patients that underwent CRS/HIPEC +/- EPIC for mucinous appendiceal neoplasms from June 2003 to February 2022. RESULTS: A total of 545 patients were identified. Although there was a survival difference between CC-0 and CC-1 on univariate analyses, this was not statistically significant on multivariate analysis. Histology, peritoneal cancer index, and EPIC status were demonstrated to be independent factors that affected overall survival (OS) on multivariate analysis. Patients with CC-1 that received EPIC had significantly improved OS (mean OS 14 years) when compared to patients that did not receive EPIC (mean OS 6 years). In CC-1, OS was significantly improved in patients that received EPIC in both low-grade (p<0.001) and high-grade (p=0.012) disease. OS for patients that received EPIC at 1, 5, and 10 years was 95%, 80%, and 59%, respectively. OS for patients that did not receive EPIC at 1, 5, and 10 years was 84%, 49%, and 30%, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in OS between CC-0 and CC-1. The implementation of EPIC in patients with CC-1 significantly improved OS in both low-grade and high-grade disease and thus we recommend its addition in CC-1 disease to achieve optimal survival outcome.

Association of Systemic Chemotherapy Approaches With Outcomes in Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Many patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) for appendiceal adenocarcinoma peritoneal metastases (APM) undergo preoperative systemic chemotherapy. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate differences in oncologic outcomes among two popular chemotherapy approaches in patients with APM undergoing CRS-HIPEC. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective review of patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC for APM due to high or intermediate grade disease between 2013 and 2019. Patients in the total neoadjuvant therapy group (TNT) received 12 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy. Patients in the "sandwich" chemotherapy group (SAND) received six cycles of preoperative chemotherapy with a maximum of six cycles of postoperative chemotherapy. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) defined as months from date of first treatment or surgery, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were included in this analysis, with 25 (64%) patients in the TNT group and 14 (36%) patients in the SAND group. Patients in the TNT group had a median OS of 62 mo, while median OS in the SAND group was 45 mo (P = 0.01). In addition, patients in the TNT group had significantly longer RFS compared to the SAND group (35 versus 12 mo, P = 0.03). In a multivariable analysis, TNT approach was independently associated with improved OS and RFS. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter retrospective analysis, a TNT approach was associated with improved overall and recurrence-free survival compared to a sandwiched chemotherapy approach in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for high or intermediate grade APM.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in appendix cancer A single-center experience.

AIM: The traditional treatment for appendiceal cancer with peritoneal spread is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) but added HIPEC chemotherapy to cytoreductive surgery and has shown that it improves overall survival. The aim of this study was to report the results of CRS and HIPEC treated patients with appendiceal cancers which is based on the experience of at Surgical oncology department. MATERIAL-METHOD: Ankara University School of Medicine, Deparment of Surgical Oncology. The data of patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC for appendiceal cancer between January 2008 - January 2019 was retrospectively analysed. 40 patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with unresectable liver metastasis, large retroperitoneal tumor, tumoral infiltration in the intestinal mesentery and liver hilum were excluded from the study. RESULTS: The mean (±sd) PCI was 17.98 (±8.21). Twenty six patients's completeness of cytoreduction score was 0(65.0%), 10(25.0%) CCS-1, 3(7.5%) CCS-2 and 1(2.5%) CCS-3. There was statistically significant difference with prognosis between ccr score, ASA, lymphovascular invasion, PCI score, albumin categories. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients survival can be increased. However, it is thought that cytoreductive surgery should be performed even if completeness of cytoreduction score is two. In our study we represent that >17PCI patients could be managed by CRS/HIPEC if the CC score ≤2 can be reached. Our results suggest that the CRS/HIPEC procedure can improve the benefits of larger patient group and provides longer survival. KEY WORDS: Appendiceal Neoplasms, Cytoreductive Surgery, Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Pleural decortication and hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma.

Aim: Pleural dissemination of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is an extremely rare diagnosis, for which no standard therapy is available.Methods: We describe the successful treatment of a 67-year-old male diagnosed with left-sided intrapleural dissemination of PMP (low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm), 2 years after treatment of abdominal PMP with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of extended pleural decortication (ePD) and oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC). The patient is doing well without complications or signs of recurrence, 26 months after thoracic surgery.Conclusion: ePD in combination with HITHOC is a valuable treatment for thoracic PMP.

Socioeconomic Barriers to CRS HIPEC for Appendiceal Cancer within a Regional Academic Hospital System.

BACKGROUND: Appendiceal cancer with peritoneal metastases (ACPM) is a complex disease requiring multidisciplinary care. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (CRS HIPEC) can significantly improve survival but requires evaluation by a surgical oncologist and significant treatment endurance. The impacts of socioeconomic status (SES) and other social determinants of health on rates of surgical evaluation and treatment have not been examined. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining all patients with ACPM from 2010 to 2018 in a regional healthcare system. Patient characteristics, oncologic details, treatment strategies, and survival were examined. The primary outcomes of interest were referral to Surgical Oncology, receipt of CRS HIPEC, and survival. RESULTS: Of 194 patients identified, 94% had synchronous ACPM. The majority of patients (95%) were referred to surgical oncology. Advanced age was the only predictor of nonreferral (p < 0.001). A total of 147 patients (76%) ultimately underwent CRS HIPEC. After adjusting for medical and tumor characteristics, CRS HIPEC was less likely for patients who were unmarried [odds ratio (OR) 0.253, p = 0.004] or of low SES (OR 0.372, p = 0.03). On subanalysis of patients undergoing CRS HIPEC, median overall survival was worse for patients of low SES [51 months versus not reached (NR), p = 0.05], and this disparity persisted on multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.278, p = 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis is the first to evaluate barriers to CRS HIPEC for ACPM. While most patients were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team, nonmedical factors may play a role in the treatment received and ultimate outcomes. Addressing these disparities is crucial for ensuring equitable outcomes and improving patient care.

Is Cytoreductive Surgery-Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Still Indicated in Patients With Extraperitoneal Disease?

INTRODUCTION: The role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with extraperitoneal disease (EPD) is controversial. METHODS: Among patients with peritoneal metastases from appendiceal cancer (AC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) who underwent CRS-HIPEC, those with EPD (liver, lung, or retroperitoneal lymph nodes [RP LN]) were retrospectively compared to those without EPD. Overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) analyses were performed before/after propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Among 1341 patients with AC (64%) or CRC (36%) who underwent CRS ± HIPEC, 134 (10%) had EPD whereas 1207 (90%) did not. EPD was located in the lungs (47%), RP LN (28%), liver (18%), or multiple (6%). Patients with EPD experienced worse median OS (34 versus 63 mo; P = 0.002) and RFS (12 versus 19 mo; P < 0.001). On a multivariable analysis, EPD was associated with worse RFS (P = 0.003), but not OS (P = 0.071). After PSM, the association of EPD with OS (P = 0.204) and RFS (P = 0.056) was no longer significant. In the multivariable analysis of the PSM cohort, EPD was not associated with OS (P = 0.157) or RFS (P = 0.110). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this large retrospective multi-institutional study suggest that EPD alone, while a negative prognostic indicator, should not be considered an absolute contraindication to CRS ± HIPEC for otherwise well-selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. Further research is needed to delineate whether location of EPD influences OS and RFS following CRS-HIPEC.

An International Registry of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Appendiceal Goblet Cell Carcinoma Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal goblet cell carcinoma (A-GCC) is a rare and aggressive form of appendiceal tumor. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intra peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was reported as an interesting alternative regarding survival compared to surgery without HIPEC and/or systemic chemotherapy. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of CRS and HIPEC for patients presenting A-GCC through an international registry. METHODS: A prospective multicenter international database was retrospectively searched to identify all patients with A-GCC tumor and peritoneal metastases who underwent CRS and HIPEC through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI). The post-operative complications, long-term results, and principal prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: The analysis included 83 patients. After a median follow-up of 47 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 34.6 months. The 3- and 5-year OS was 48.5% and 35.7%, respectively. Patients who underwent complete macroscopic CRS had a significantly better survival than those treated with incomplete CRS. The 5-year OS was 44% and 0% for patients who underwent complete, and incomplete CRS, respectively (HR 9.65, p < 0.001). Lymph node involvement and preoperative chemotherapy were also predictive of a worse prognosis. There were 3 postoperative deaths, and 30% of the patients had major complications. CONCLUSION: CRS and HIPEC may increase long-term survival in selected patients with peritoneal metastases of A-GCC origin, especially when complete CRS is achieved. Ideally, randomized control trials or more retrospective data are needed to confirm CRS and HIPEC as the gold standard in this pathology.

Systemic metastases from low-grade and high-grade pseudomyxoma peritonei: Treatments and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The metastasizing potential of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is largely unknown. We assessed incidence, impact on prognosis, treatments, and outcomes of systemic metastases after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). METHODS: A prospective database of 327 patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for PMP of appendiceal origin was reviewed. PMP was graded according to the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) classification. Haematogenous metastases, and non-regional lymph-node involvement were considered as systemic metastases. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 74.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 68.0-94.8), systemic metastases occurred in 21 patients. Eleven patients were affected by low-grade PMP, and ten by high-grade PMP. Metastatic disease involved the lung (n = 12), bone (n = 1), liver (n = 4), distant nodes (n = 3), both lung and distant nodes (n = 1). Systemic metastases independently correlated with PSOGI histological subtypes (P = 0.001), and incomplete cytoreduction (P = 0.026). Median OS was 139.0 months (95%CI = 56.6-161.9) for patients who experienced systemic metastases, and 213.8 months (95%CI = 148.7-not reached) for those who did not (P = 0.159). Eight of eleven patients who had curative-intent surgery are presently alive at a median of 52.5 months (range 2.0-112.7). Seven are disease-free at a median of 27.4 months (range 2.0-110.4). At multivariate analysis, PSOGI histological subtypes (P = 0.001), completeness of cytoreduction (P = 0.001), and preoperative systemic chemotherapy (P = 0.020) correlated with poorer survival. Systemic metastases did not (P = 0.861). CONCLUSIONS: After CRS/HIPEC, systemic metastases occur in a small but clinically relevant number of patients, and the risk increases with incomplete cytoreduction and aggressive histology. In selected patients, surgical resection of metastatic disease can result in long survival.

Outcomes Following Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with and without Diaphragmatic Resection in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic resection (DR) is often required during cytoreductive surgery/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) to achieve complete cytoreduction (CC). While CC provides the best survival, requiring a DR may indicate unfavorable tumor biology. We assessed how DR during CRS/HIPEC affects outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a prospective single-center database from October 1994-May 2020. Peritoneal surface malignancy patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC with CC-0/1/2 were assigned to DR and NoDR groups. Survival was measured using the Kaplan-Meier method. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients with peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ≥ 20 to eliminate confounding of more extensive disease in DR. RESULTS: Of 824 CRS/HIPECs, 774 were included: 134 DR and 640 NoDR. PCI was significantly higher in DR: 29 versus 21, p < 0.001. CC-0/1 rate was 89% in DR and 95% in NoDR (p = 0.003). Neither 100-day morbidity nor mortality differed between the groups (p = 0.355 and p = 1.000). Median follow-up was 64 months. Median overall survival (OS) was significantly lower in DR (32 vs. 96 months, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by tumor type in patients with PCI ≥ 20 showed significantly shorter OS in DR than NoDR in appendiceal (40 vs. 196 months, p < 0.001) and colorectal (14 vs. 23 months, p = 0.003), but not in ovarian tumors (32 vs. 42 months, p = 0.893), whereas median PCI did not differ among subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: DR during CRS/HIPEC does not increase morbidity and mortality. It is associated with worse survival in appendiceal and colorectal tumors, even after adjusting for tumor burden but does not appear to impact ovarian cancer survival.