Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(10): 4923-4931, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32016600

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Primary care providers (PCPs) are critical to the provision of comprehensive care for cancer survivors, yet there is very little data on the practices and quality of survivorship care occurring in safety net primary care settings. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitudes of PCPs and preferences for care models for breast and colon cancer survivors in a safety net health network. METHODS: A modified National Cancer Institute Survey of Physician Attitudes Regarding the Care of Cancer Survivors was sent electronically to 220 PCPs in 12 primary care clinics in the San Francisco Health Network affiliated with Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center. RESULTS: The response rate was 50% (110/220). About half of PCPs strongly/somewhat agreed (vs. strongly/somewhat disagreed) that PCPs have the knowledge needed to provide follow-up care related to breast (50%) and colon cancer (54%). Most providers (93%) correctly reported recommended frequency of mammography, however, frequency of blood tests and other imaging surveillance were not as well recognized for breast or colon cancer. Recognition of long-term side effects of chemotherapy drugs ranged from 12% for oxaliplatin to 44% for doxorubicin. Only 33% of providers reported receiving any survivorship training. The most preferred model for survivorship care was shared care model (40%). CONCLUSIONS: Safety net PCPs prefer a shared care model for care of cancer survivors but are limited by lack of training, poor communication, and poor delineation of roles. Patient-centered survivorship care can be improved through effective oncologist-PCP-patient partnerships and coordination.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/rehabilitación , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias del Colon/rehabilitación , Cuidados Posteriores , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Colon/diagnóstico , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Femenino , Humanos , Conocimiento , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos de Atención Primaria/psicología , Médicos de Atención Primaria/normas , Médicos de Atención Primaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , San Francisco , Autoeficacia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents ; 31(4): 1073-1079, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29254317

RESUMEN

Colon cancer is a common malignant tumor with particularly high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of quick rehabilitation nursing and routine nursing in postoperative recovery of patients with colon cancer after laparoscopic surgery. Two hundred forty patients with colon cancer were classified into four random groups (A, B, C and D, with 60 patients in each group). All patients underwent surgery to remove the colon tumor by laparoscopy under general anesthesia. Patients in groups A and B received quick rehabilitation nursing for post-surgery recovery. In group C patients, local anesthesia associated with quick rehabilitation nursing for post-surgery recovery was used. Group D was used as control group and the patients were treated based on routine nursing. Time to get out of bed, first bowel movement time and the average time of hospitalisation in group A was lower than group D (p less than 0.05), postoperative leukocyte level as well as the occurrence rate of nausea and vomiting, ankylenteron and pelvic adhesion was decreased in group A compared to group D (p less than 0.05), but the postoperative albumin and total protein level was higher than group D (p less than 0.05). The serum level of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) in group A was decreased compared to group D several days after surgery (p less than 0.05); group B had 4 cases of intestinal obstruction after surgery that could be cured through conservative treatment, while group D had 10 cases of intestinal obstruction, 8 of which could be cured through conservative treatment and two needed surgery (p less than 0.05); VAS for pain degree of group C in active state was clearly lower at 1h, 5h, 7h, 15h, 30h and 42h after surgery, and side effects of postoperative analgesia were clearly reduced. Time to get out of bed was obviously decreased, while there was no evident effect on postoperative dosage, chronic pain and complications. Adopting quick rehabilitation nursing can effectively reduce occurrence of complications and postoperative pain, speed up the recovery of gastrointestinal function, shorten the length of stay, and improve patients’ satisfaction.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/rehabilitación , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico , Laparoscopía/rehabilitación , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/prevención & control , Enfermería en Rehabilitación/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Albuminuria/sangre , Albuminuria/diagnóstico , Albuminuria/fisiopatología , Anestesia General/métodos , Anestesia Local/métodos , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Neoplasias del Colon/sangre , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Interleucina-6/sangre , Obstrucción Intestinal/sangre , Obstrucción Intestinal/patología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/sangre , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/fisiopatología , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/sangre , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/diagnóstico , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/fisiopatología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
Klin Khir ; (12): 12-6, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Ucraniano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27025022

RESUMEN

Results of treatment of 215 patients with colon cancer (CC), whom performed at the clinic radical or palliative intervention were analyzed. In 100 patients (control group) enteral nutrition (EN) began after the restoration of the alimentary canal functions; in 115 (main group)--no later than 12 hours after surgery. For the EN in all patients used a balanced liquid mixture "Frezubin" manufactured by Fresenius Kabi GmbH (Germany). It is proved that early EN is a safe and effective method in the program of the accelerated rehabilitation of patients after surgery for CC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/rehabilitación , Neoplasias del Colon/terapia , Proteínas en la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Nutrición Enteral , Colectomía , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Alimentos Formulados , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Factores de Tiempo
4.
Dig Surg ; 25(5): 335-8, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18827488

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate whether changes can be accomplished rapidly after implementing a fast-track colonic surgery project at a university-affiliated general teaching hospital. METHODS: In 2004 and 2005 all colonic surgery patients were recorded for a number of pre-, per- and postoperative care elements. In 2006, during the implementation of a fast-track program, changes were recorded. RESULTS: Before the implementation of the fast-track regime at our hospital, 97% of the patients (n = 89/92) received mechanical bowel preparation, in contrast to 3% (n = 1/36) afterwards (p < 0.0001). The application of thoracic epidural analgesia rose from 46% (n = 42/92) in 2004 and 2005 to 94% (n = 34/36) in 2006 (p < 0.0001). The use of nasogastric tubes postoperatively almost disappeared. 77% (n = 28/36) enjoyed a small meal on the 1st day after operation, compared to 0% (n = 0/92) in 2004 and 2005 (p < 0.0001). Median hospital stay was 6 (range 3-27) nights in 2006 compared to 9 (range 3-25) nights in 2005 and 9.5 (range 7-64) nights in 2004 (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: These preliminary results show that also at a district general teaching hospital advantages can be reached rapidly and safely by implementing fast-track surgery; especially a faster recovery.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/rehabilitación , Enfermedades del Colon/rehabilitación , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Vías Clínicas , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Colectomía/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/rehabilitación , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Ingestión de Alimentos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/rehabilitación , Enema/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA