Right Versus Left Cuff Position for Upper Airway Stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: Upper airway stimulation (UAS) is a treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea in which electrical stimulation is applied to the hypoglossal nerve. Nerve branches that control tongue protrusion are located inferiorly. Due to positioning, left-sided implants are typically placed with an inferiorly oriented electrode cuff (L-down) as opposed to superiorly on the right (R-up). In this study, we assess the impact of left- versus right-sided UAS on patient outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary Academic Medical Center. METHODS: Patients who underwent UAS implantation between 2016 and 2021 with an L-down or R-up oriented cuff as confirmed by X-ray were included. Data were collected retrospectively. Most recent sleep study variables were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 61.0 ± 11.0 years, with 55 (28.9%) females. L-down orientation was present in 21 (11.1%) patients vs 169 (88.9%) R-up. Indications for L-down included hunting/shooting (n = 15), prior radiation/surgery (n = 4), central port (n = 1), and brachial plexus injury (n = 1). Adherence was higher among L-down patients (47.1 vs 41.0 hours use/week, P = .037) in univariate analysis, with a similar time to adherence data collection (4.4 vs 4.2 months, P = .612), though this finding was not maintained in the multivariate regression analysis. Decrease in apnea-hypopnea index (21.3 vs 22.8, P = .734), treatment success (76.5% vs 84.0%, P = .665), functional threshold (1.5 vs 1.6, P = .550), therapeutic amplitude (2.3 vs 2.4, P = .882), and decrease in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (4.9 vs 2.6, P = .060) were not significantly different between cohorts. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to examine the orientation of the UAS electrode cuff concerning the electrodes' natural position and the potential effect on postoperative outcomes. Our study found no significantly different treatment outcomes between the L-down versus R-up cohort, with the exception of device adherence, which was significantly higher in the L-down group on univariate analysis though not on multivariate analysis. Future studies with larger patient cohorts are needed to further investigate this potential relationship between treatment outcomes and electrode cuff orientation.

Pediatric Down Syndrome Upper Airway Stimulation: Patient Selection and Post-Implantation Optimization.

OBJECTIVE: The Food and Drug Administration recently approved upper airway stimulation (UAS) for children with Down Syndrome and persistent obstructive sleep apnea who meet certain inclusion and exclusion criteria. Although there is a robust experience with this therapy in the adult population, established protocols used in adults are not directly transferrable to a complex pediatric population. This review aims to combine the protocols from several institutions for patient selection and postimplantation optimization, including a protocol for Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy in children with Down Syndrome, preactivation threshold measurements, device titration, and follow-up sleep studies. STUDY DESIGN: Expert panel development of best Practice algorithm. SETTING: Multi-institutional investigator review. METHODS: An expert panel was assembled of pediatric otolaryngologists with extensive experience in hypoglossal nerve stimulation in children with Down Syndrome. Thirty statements were created during an initial drafting session. A modified Delphi method was used assess consensus among the panel. RESULTS: After 2 rounds of Delphi surveys, 29 statements met criteria for consensus. One statement did not meet consensus. The statements were grouped into several categories to facilitate presentation. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized approach to UAS for children with Down Syndrome must take into account the unique challenges inherent to treating a complex pediatric population with a high rate of sensory processing disorders. This expert panel has met consensus on several statements that will guide clinicians as this novel therapy is adopted.

Advances in the Use of Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator in Adolescents With Down Syndrome and Persistent Obstructive Sleep Apnea-A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: The Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator (HNS) is a novel therapy that has been extensively studied in adults and more recently, it has been incorporated in children with Down Syndrome (DS) with persistent obstructive sleep apnea after adenotonsillectomy and trial of continuous positive airway pressure treatment. This systematic review article aims to examine the existing literature on HNS use in children to explore the benefits, efficacy, and parental experiences. METHODS: MEDLINE, Web of Science and EMBASE were searched to include all studies published up to March 2nd, 2023, on the topic of HNS use in pediatric population under 21 years old. RESULTS: A total of 179 studies were initially identified from which 10 articles were consistent with the inclusion criteria. Nine articles addressed outcomes after implantation of the HNS device in children with DS and 1 article explored the parental experiences. Findings were similar across studies where after implantation of HNS, there was marked improvement in polysomnographic outcomes and quality of life scores with high level of compliance. CONCLUSIONS: HNS holds promise as an effective treatment option for pediatric patients with DS and persistent OSA after AT and CPAP trials. It significantly improves sleep-disordered breathing, quality of life, and neurocognitive measures, leading to substantial and sustained benefits for these children. While the findings are encouraging, further research is needed to explore the potential of HNS in other pediatric populations without DS and to raise awareness among healthcare providers about this treatment option. Overall, HNS may offer significant long-term benefits for the overall well-being and health of pediatric patients with DS and persistent OSA.

Snoring Patterns During Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy Up-Titration.

Longitudinal snoring changes can be captured using a mobile phone application. During hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HNS) therapy up-titration, increasing stimulation voltage was associated with reduced snoring frequency and intensity in this case series of six patients. Laryngoscope, 134:987-992, 2024.

Impact of Insomnia on Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Outcomes in the ADHERE Registry.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the preoperative prevalence of insomnia in the Adherence and Outcomes of Upper Airway Stimulation for OSA International Registry (ADHERE) and to examine serial sleep-related data longitudinally, in particular the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), to compare outcomes between patients with no/subthreshold insomnia (ISI < 15) and moderate/severe insomnia (ISI ≥ 15) at baseline. METHODS: We analyzed observational data from ADHERE between March 2020 and September 2022. Baseline demographic and mental health (MH) data, apnea hypopnea index (AHI), ISI, and ESS (Epworth Sleepiness Scale) were recorded. At post-titration (PT) and final visits, AHI, ISI, ESS and nightly usage were compared between baseline ISI < 15 and ISI ≥ 15 subgroups. RESULTS: A baseline ISI was obtained in 928 patients (62% with ISI ≥ 15). Of the 578 and 141 patients reaching the 12- and 24-month time periods to complete PT and final visits, 292 (50.5%) and 91 (64.5%) completed the ISI, respectively. Baseline MH conditions were higher with ISI ≥ 15 than ISI < 15 (p < 0.001). AHI reduction and adherence did not differ between patients with baseline ISI ≥ 15 and ISI < 15. Patients with ISI ≥ 15 experienced greater improvement in ESS than ISI < 15 at post-titration and final visits (p = 0.014, 0.025). All patients had improved nocturnal, daytime, and overall ISI scores at follow-up visits (p < 0.001), especially for those with baseline ISI ≥ 15 compared with ISI < 15 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: HGNS therapy efficacy and adherence were similar between ISI severity subgroups at follow-up visits. Insomnia and sleepiness scores improved in all patients with HGNS therapy and to a greater degree in patients with baseline moderate/severe insomnia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:471-479, 2024.

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation and Cardiovascular Outcomes for Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Sham-controlled trials are needed to characterize the effect of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) therapy on cardiovascular end points in patients with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Objective: To determine the effect of therapeutic levels of HGNS, compared to sham levels, on blood pressure, sympathetic activity, and vascular function. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized crossover therapy trial was conducted from 2018 to 2022 at 3 separate academic medical centers. Adult patients with OSA who already had an HGNS device implanted and were adherent and clinically optimized to HGNS therapy were included. Participants who had fallen asleep while driving within 1 year prior to HGNS implantation were excluded from the trial. Data analysis was performed from January to September 2022. Interventions: Participants underwent a 4-week period of active HGNS therapy and a 4-week period of sham HGNS therapy in a randomized order. Each 4-week period concluded with collection of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), pre-ejection period (PEP), and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) values. Main Outcomes and Measures: The change in mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure was the primary outcome, with other ABPM end points exploratory, and PEP and FMD were cosecondary end points. Results: Participants (n = 60) were older (mean [SD] age, 67.3 [9.9] years), overweight (mean [SD] body mass index, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, 28.7 [4.6]), predominantly male (38 [63%]), and had severe OSA at baseline (mean [SD] apnea-hypopnea index, 33.1 [14.9] events/h). There were no differences observed between active and sham therapy in 24-hour systolic blood pressure (mean change on active therapy, -0.18 [95% CI, -2.21 to 1.84] mm Hg), PEP (mean change on active therapy, 0.11 [95% CI, -5.43 to 5.66] milliseconds), or FMD (mean change on active therapy, -0.17% [95% CI, -1.88% to 1.54%]). Larger differences between active and sham therapy were observed in a per-protocol analysis set (n = 20) defined as experiencing at least a 50% reduction in apnea-hypopnea index between sham and active treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: In this sham-controlled HGNS randomized clinical trial, mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure and other cardiovascular measures were not significantly different between sham and active HGNS therapy. Several methodologic lessons can be gleaned to inform future HGNS randomized clinical trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03359096.

Mitigating Infection Risk in Upper Airway Stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to define the incidence of infection with upper airway stimulation (UAS) devices requiring explantation in a single academic center and identify factors that may influence the risk of infection. METHODS: A database of patients who underwent UAS at a single tertiary referral academic center from 2017 to 2021 was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who developed surgical site infections, with and without subsequent explantation. Additional data for cases complicated by infection was extracted from the electronic medical record (EMR) and included: demographic information, medical history, complications and management, and overall outcomes. In March 2021, 2 modifications to infection control protocols were implemented: double skin preparation with Betadine and chlorhexidine, and MRSA decolonization. Statistical analysis was performed to compare infectious risk before and after these protocol changes. RESULTS: In the study period, 215 patients underwent UAS in the specified time period and 3 cases (1.4%) of postoperative infections were identified, all of which required explantation. The infection rate did not significantly change after modifications to the surgical prep protocol (P = .52). CONCLUSIONS: While no significant difference in infection risk was noted after modifying infection control protocols, additional longer-term study is warranted to elucidate effective infection reduction strategies.

Challenges and adverse events in pediatric hypoglossal nerve stimulation.

INTRODUCTION: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation was recently FDA approved for use in children with Down Syndrome and persistent obstructive sleep apnea. Although there is a robust experience in hypoglossal nerve stimulation in adults, we observed several challenges that are unique to providing this therapy to a complex pediatric population with a high rate of sensory processing disorders. We sought to review the adverse events and challenges to inform clinicians as hypoglossal nerve stimulation becomes a more accessible option for this complex population. METHODS: Retrospective case series of children with Down Syndrome and persistent OSA who underwent hypoglossal nerve stimulation. Inclusion and exclusion criteria included Down Syndrome, age 10-22 years, persistent severe OSA after adenotonsillectomy (AHI>10 with <25 % central or mixed events), inability to tolerate positive airway pressure, and absence of concentric palatal collapse on sleep endoscopy. Patients were identified and their charts were reviewed. Adverse events and their subsequent management were recorded. The major outcome variable was the total number of adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients underwent implantation of a hypoglossal nerve stimulator; 35 (66 %) patients were male and the average age at implantation was 15.1 years (standard deviation 3.0y). A total of 30 adverse events were noted, including 17 nonserious and 13 serious. The most common nonserious complications included temporary tongue discomfort, rash at the surgical site, and cellulitis. Serious complications included readmission (for cellulitis, pain, and device extrusion), reoperation (most commonly for battery depletion) and pressure ulcer formation. CONCLUSION: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation provides a much-needed therapy for children with DS and persistent OSA after adenotonsillectomy. Although there is a robust experience in providing this treatment to adults, many considerations must be made when adapting this technology to a pediatric population with a high rate of sensory processing disorders.

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Effects on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGS) in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane database, Embase, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar. REVIEW METHODS: Five databases were reviewed to identify relevant studies that measured polysomnography parameters such as the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index, as well as quality of life and functional outcomes of sleep questionnaire scores, before and after HGS. RESULTS: In total, 44 studies involving 8670 patients met the inclusion criteria. At 12 months after treatment, approximately 47%, 72%, and 82% of patients achieved AHI values of <5, < 10, and <15, respectively. The reported clinical success rates according to Sher criteria were 80% within 12 months and 73% between 12 and 36 months. While the favorable effects exhibited a gradual reduction up to 12 months postimplantation, they generally maintained a consistent level between the 12th and 36th months, as assessed by AHI < 5, <15, and success rate according to Sher criteria. CONCLUSION: HGS can enhance quality of life scores and polysomnography outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea patients. Although the positive effects gradually decreased until 12 months after implantation, they generally remained consistent between 12 and 36 months.

[Hypoglossal Stimulation: Indication, Surgical Technique and Clinical Results]. / Hypoglossus-Stimulation: Indikation, operative Technik und klinische Ergebnisse.

Hypoglossal stimulation is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with obstructive sleep apnea and unsuccessful PAP therapy. A number of criteria must be met for the indication: proof of failed PAP therapy and ineffectiveness of the other therapy alternatives, AHI of 15-65/h (a relevant number of central and/or mixed apneas should be excluded) and BMI up to max. 35kg/m2. In the case of the respiratory-synchronous and bilateral stimulation system, a complete concentric collapse at the velum level should currently be ruled out in DISE. In the future, stimulation of the branch of the ansa cervicalis innervating the sternothyroid muscle and the ramus internus of the superior laryngeal nerve could open up additional treatment options.

Minimally Invasive Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Enabled by ECG Sensor and WPT to Manage Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

A hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) is an invasive device that is used to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) through electrical stimulation. The conventional implantable HGNS device consists of a stimuli generator, a breathing sensor, and electrodes connected to the hypoglossal nerve via leads. However, this implant is bulky and causes significant trauma. In this paper, we propose a minimally invasive HGNS based on an electrocardiogram (ECG) sensor and wireless power transfer (WPT), consisting of a wearable breathing monitor and an implantable stimulator. The breathing external monitor utilizes an ECG sensor to identify abnormal breathing patterns associated with OSA with 88.68% accuracy, achieved through the utilization of a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm. With a skin thickness of 5 mm and a receiving coil diameter of 9 mm, the power conversion efficiency was measured as 31.8%. The implantable device, on the other hand, is composed of a front-end CMOS power management module (PMM), a binary-phase-shift-keying (BPSK)-based data demodulator, and a bipolar biphasic current stimuli generator. The PMM, with a silicon area of 0.06 mm2 (excluding PADs), demonstrated a power conversion efficiency of 77.5% when operating at a receiving frequency of 2 MHz. Furthermore, it offers three-voltage options (1.2 V, 1.8 V, and 3.1 V). Within the data receiver component, a low-power BPSK demodulator was ingeniously incorporated, consuming only 42 µW when supplied with a voltage of 0.7 V. The performance was achieved through the implementation of the self-biased phase-locked-loop (PLL) technique. The stimuli generator delivers biphasic constant currents, providing a 5 bit programmable range spanning from 0 to 2.4 mA. The functionality of the proposed ECG- and WPT-based HGNS was validated, representing a highly promising solution for the effective management of OSA, all while minimizing the trauma and space requirements.

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation for adults with obstructive sleep apnea.

ABSTRACT: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common chronic condition in which upper airway collapse interferes with breathing during sleep, reducing sleep quality. Untreated OSA can impair a patient's health and quality of life. The recommended first-line treatment for OSA in adults is positive airway pressure, but difficulty tolerating this device limits adherence to treatment for many patients. Treatment with an implanted hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) device is a relatively new second-line option for these patients, and is gaining more widespread use. Clinicians who treat OSA or provide other healthcare services to patients with HNS implants should be familiar with these devices. This article reviews HNS technology and relevant OSA pathophysiology, along with device candidacy criteria, efficacy, risks, and considerations related to use of other medical technologies for patients with HNS implants.

Increased Body Mass Index Correlates with Less Favorable Postoperative Outcomes After Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with high morbidity. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) has become a novel (neuro-) surgical treatment strategy for obstructive sleep apnea, demonstrating good success rates. Beyond predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, no precise data are available, enabling individual preoperative risk assessment. To improve preoperative risk stratification, this study analyzed individual patient factors that affect outcomes of HNS. METHODS: Fourteen patients treated with unilateral HNS were analyzed retrospectively. Assessed risk factors included: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, depression, smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index (BMI), and disease duration. Treatment success was defined as a reduction in the postoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) to ≤20 events/hour, with a relative reduction of at least 50% compared to baseline. RESULTS: A significant reduction in the postoperative apnea-hypopnea index was observed in all patients (P < 0.0001). BMI correlated significantly with postoperative AHI scores (95% confidence interval, 0.1519-0.8974; P = 0.018). Significant treatment success was observed in 50% of patients. Compared with the "Excellent Responder group," the "Responder group" demonstrated a significantly higher BMI (95% confidence interval, 1.174-6.226; P = 0.0078). Diabetes, hypertension, disease duration, smoking, depression, and alcohol consumption were not significantly associated with AHI reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that BMI may be an independent risk factor for the response to HNS, with patients who had less benefit from therapy having significantly higher BMI than "Excellent Responders." Therefore, carefully selecting patients is crucial in obtaining optimal outcomes with HNS therapy, especially those with a high BMI.

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by repetitive episodes of disrupted breathing during sleep. The most effective treatment for OSA is positive pressure ventilation; however, this treatment can be complicated by adherence difficulties. An array of alternative OSA therapies have emerged, including positional therapy, nasal exhalation devices, oral appliances, and various nasal, pharyngeal, and skeletal surgical treatments. One of the newest options, hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) therapy, represents a hybrid medical and surgical treatment. This therapy involves an FDA-approved surgically implanted neuromodulation system that is activated by the patient each night to augment upper airway dilator muscle activity and improve airflow. The implanted components comprise a pulse generator, an electrode on the distal portion of the hypoglossal nerve, and a respiratory sensing lead that allows for synchronization of electrical impulses with the patient's respiratory cycle. Using a representative patient case, the authors describe HNS therapy, including its indications, patient selection, surgical procedure, long-term outpatient management, and outcomes data.

Patient-reported outcomes with hypoglossal nerve stimulation for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) has recently been introduced as an alternative treatment for patients with OSA. A large number of studies have demonstrated substantial changes in OSA with this therapy by reducing respiratory events and improving symptoms such as daytime sleepiness and quality of life. The objective of this review was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate patient-reported outcomes and experience with HNS therapy. METHODS: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Web of Science was performed to identify randomized controlled and observational studies reporting subjective outcomes with different HNS systems in patients with OSA. Abstracts of 406 articles were screened and a subset of 55 articles were reviewed for eligibility. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Meta-analysis using RevMan was performed when > 2 studies were identified that reported data on a specific outcome. RESULTS: Thirty-four publications reporting data on 3785 patients with a mean follow-up of 11.8 ± 12.2 months were identified and included in the meta-analysis. The analysis revealed a pooled effect of 4.59 points improvement in daytime sleepiness as measured by the ESS questionnaire (Z = 42.82, p < .001), 2.84 points improvement in daytime functioning as measured by the FOSQ score (Z = 28.38, p < .001), and 1.77 points improvement in sleep quality as measured by the PSQI questionnaire (Z = 2.53, p = .010). Patient-reported experience was consistently positive and revealed additional relevant aspects from this perspective. CONCLUSION: HNS therapy significantly improves quality of life in patients with OSA and reliably produces clinically meaningful effects on daytime sleepiness, daytime functioning, and sleep quality. Treatment regularly meets or exceeds the minimum clinically important differences defined for the respective instruments. Additional research is needed to further investigate effects on quality of life beyond improvements in daytime sleepiness and daytime functioning.

Hypoglossal nerve trunk stimulation: electromyography findings during drug-induced sleep endoscopy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Literature has demonstrated hypoglossal nerve stimulation to be a safe and effective treatment for patients with obstructive sleep apnea nonadherent to positive airway pressure therapy. However, the recommended criteria for patient selection are still unable to identify all the unresponsive patients, highlighting the need for improved understanding about hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea. CASE PRESENTATION: A 48-year-old Caucasian male patient with obstructive sleep apnea had been successfully treated with electrical stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve trunk, documented by level 1 polysomnography data. However, due to snoring complaints, he underwent postoperation drug-induced sleep endoscopy for evaluation of electrode activation during upper airway collapse, aiming to improve electrostimulation parameters. Concurrent surface electromyography of the suprahyoid muscles and masseter was obtained. Activation of electrodes 2, 3, and 6 promoted upper airway opening most strongly at the velopharynx and tongue base during drug-induced sleep endoscopy. The same channels also significantly increased the electrical activity on suprahyoid muscles bilaterally, but predominantly on the stimulated side (right). The masseters also presented a considerable asymmetry in electrical potential on the right side (> 55%). CONCLUSION: Beyond the genioglossus muscle, our findings demonstrate recruitment of other muscles during hypoglossal nerve stimulation, which may be attributed to the electrical stimulation of the nerve trunk. This data provides new insights on how stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve trunk may contribute to obstructive sleep apnea treatment.

Successful Reimplantation of Extruded Lead after Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Surgery.

Infection and extrusion of hardware are known complications of hypoglossal nerve stimulation surgery. We present a unique case of an extruded hardware lead successfully managed with reimplantation without need for explantation and new device placement. The topic will be discussed in context of the body of literature related to extruded medical device management. Laryngoscope, 133:2821-2822, 2023.

Long-Term Generator Replacement Experience in Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Therapy Recipients With CPAP-Intolerant Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

OBJECTIVE: In the last decade, hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) has emerged as a therapeutic alternative for patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The original clinical trial cohorts are entering the phase of expected battery depletion (8-12 years). This study aimed to examine the surgical experience with implantable pulse generator (IPG) replacements and the associated long-term therapy outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patients from the original clinical trial databases (STAR, German post-market) who were followed in the ongoing ADHERE registry. SETTING: International multicenter HNS registry. METHODS: The ADHERE registry and clinical trial databases were cross-referenced to identify the serial numbers of IPGs that were replaced. Data collection included demographics, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), therapy use, operative times, and adverse events. RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent IPG replacement 8.3 ± 1.1 years after their initial implantation. Body mass index was unchanged between the original implant and IPG replacement (29 ± 4 vs 28 ± 2 kg/m2 , p = .50). The mean IPG replacement operative time was shorter than the original implant (63 ± 50 vs 154 ± 58 minutes, p < .002); however, 2 patients required stimulation lead replacement which significantly increased operative time. For patients with available AHI and adherence data, the mean change in AHI from baseline to latest follow-up (8.7 ± 1.1 years after de novo implant) was -50.06%, and the mean therapy use was 7.2 hours/night. CONCLUSION: IPG replacement surgery was associated with low complications and shorter operative time. For patients with available outcomes data, adherence and efficacy remained stable after 9 years of follow-up.