Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in patients with multiple sclerosis and overactive bladder: a real-life clinical and urodynamic assessment.

AIMS: The aims of the present study were to assess the effectiveness of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) on overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms and on urodynamic parameters in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and to seek predictive factors of satisfaction. METHODS: All PwMS who performed 12-24 weeks of TTNS and who underwent urodynamic assessment before and after treatment between June 2020 and October 2022 were included retrospectively. Data collected were bladder diaries, symptoms assessed with Urinary Symptoms Profile (USP), and urodynamic parameters (bladder sensations, detrusor overactivity, and voiding phase). Patients with improvement rated as very good or good on Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score were considered as responders. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included (mean age: 47.1 ± 11.5 years, 67 (82%) were women). The mean USP OAB sub-score decreased from 7.7 ± 3.5 to 6.0 ± 3.4 (p < 0.0001). On bladder diaries, voided volumes, void frequency, and the proportion of micturition done at urgent need to void significantly improved with TTNS (p < 0.05). No significant change was found in urodynamic parameters. According to the PGI-I, 34 (42.5%) patients were good responders. The only parameter associated with higher satisfaction was the percentage of micturition done at urgent need to void before the initiation of the treatment (39.8% ± 30.5 in the responder group vs 25.1% ± 25.6 in the low/no responder group; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: TTNS improves OAB symptoms in PwMS, without significant changes on urodynamics. A high rate of strong or urgent need to void in daily life was associated with higher satisfaction.

Shifts in patient preference of third-line overactive bladder therapy after introduction of the implantable tibial nerve stimulator.

INTRODUCTION: Third-line therapies for overactive bladder (OAB) that are currently recommended include intravesical Onabotulinumtoxin-A injections (BTX-A), percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), and sacral neuromodulation (SNM). The implantable tibial nerve stimulator (ITNS) is a novel therapy that is now available to patients with OAB. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze shifts in patient preference of third-line therapies for OAB after introducing ITNS as an option among the previously established therapies for non-neurogenic OAB. METHODS: A survey was designed and distributed via SurveyMonkey to the platform's audience of U.S. adults of age 18 and older. Screening questions were asked to include only subjects who reported symptoms of OAB. Descriptions of current AUA/SUFU guideline-approved third-line therapies (BTX-A, PTNS, and SNM) were provided, and participants were asked to rank these therapies in order of preference (stage A). Subsequently, ITNS was introduced with a description, and participants were then asked to rank their preferences amongst current guideline-approved therapies and ITNS (stage B). Absolute and relative changes in therapy preferences between stage A and stage B were calculated. Associations between ultimate therapy choice in stage B and participant characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 485 participants completed the survey (62.5% female). The mean age was 49.1 ± 36.5 years (SD). The most common OAB symptoms reported were urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) (73.0%) and urinary urgency (68.0%). 29.2% of patients had tried medication for OAB in the past, and 8.0%-10.3% of patients were previously treated with a third-line therapy for OAB. In stage A, participants ranked their first choice of third-line therapy as follows: 28% BTX-A, 27% PTNS, and 13.8% SNM. 26.6% of participants chose no therapy, and 4.5% chose all three equally. In stage B, participants ranked their first choice as follows: 27.6% BTX-A, 19.2% PTNS, 7.8% SNM, and 19.2% ITNS. 21.9% of participants chose no therapy and 4.3% chose all four equally as their first choice. There were both absolute and relative declines in proportions of patients interested in BTX-A, SNM, and PTNS as their first choice of third-line therapy with the introduction of ITNS. Patients originally interested in PTNS in stage A had the greatest absolute change after the introduction of ITNS with 7.8% of participants opting for ITNS in stage B. Those interested in SNM in stage A had the largest relative change in interest, with 43.5% of those originally interested in SNM opting for ITNS in stage B. Finally, with the introduction of ITNS, the number of participants initially not interested in any third-line therapy declined by an absolute change of 4.7% and relative change of 17.6%. Participants experiencing concurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms were more likely to choose a current guideline-approved third-line therapy than ITNS or no therapy at all (p = 0.047). Those who had prior experience with third-line therapies were more likely to choose a third-line therapy other than ITNS as their ultimate choice of therapy in stage B. Of those who had chosen a guideline-approved third-line therapy in stage B (not ITNS), 13.6% had prior experience with BTX-A, 14.7% with PTNS, and 32 (11.2%) with SNM (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSION: From our study, it appears that ITNS may attract a subset of patients who would not have otherwise pursued current guideline-approved third-line therapies for OAB. When patients are provided with descriptions of third-line OAB therapies including ITNS as an option, ITNS appears to compete with SNM and PTNS. It is possible that ITNS will provide patients with a different phenotype of neuromodulation therapy that can appeal to a niche OAB population. Given that ITNS devices have been introduced relatively recently to the market, their application will largely depend on cost and payer coverage, provider bias, and patient comorbidities. Further study is needed to understand how these factors interact with and influence patient preference of advanced OAB therapy to understand which patients will most benefit from this treatment modality.

Is percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) effective for fecal incontinence (FI) in adults compared with sham electrical stimulation? A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sacral nerve neuromodulation (SNM) has been considered the optimal second-line treatment for fecal incontinence (FI). However, SNM involves high cost and requires highly skilled operators. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) has emerged as an alternative treatment modality for FI, yielding varying clinical outcomes. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PTNS compared to sham electrical stimulation for FI. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies from May 12, 2012 to May 12, 2022. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled studies were included in this review, involving a total of 439 adult patients with FI (300 in the PTNS group and 194 in the sham electrical stimulation group). Our meta-analysis revealed that PTNS demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing weekly episodes of FI compared to the control groups (MD - 1.6, 95% CI - 2.94 to - 0.26, p = 0.02, I2 = 30%). Furthermore, a greater proportion of patients in the PTNS group reported more than a 50% reduction in FI episodes per week (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.94, p = 0.02, I2 = 6%). However, no significant differences were observed in any domains of the FI Quality of Life (QoL) and St Mark's incontinence scores (MD - 2.41, 95% CI - 5.1 to 0.27, p = 0.08, I2 = 67%). Importantly, no severe adverse events related to PTNS were reported in any of the participants. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis revealed that PTNS was more effective than sham stimulation in reducing FI episodes and led to a higher proportion of patients reporting more than a 50% reduction in weekly FI episodes.

Who Progresses to Third-Line Therapies for Overactive Bladder? Trends From the AQUA Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Overactive bladder (OAB) patients who do not achieve satisfactory results with second-line OAB medications should be offered third-line therapies (percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, sacral neuromodulation, onabotulinumtoxinA bladder injection [BTX-A]). We aimed to determine which clinical factors affect progression from second- to third-line OAB therapy. METHODS: Between 2014 and 2020, the AUA Quality Registry was queried for adult patients with idiopathic OAB. For the primary outcome, patient and provider factors associated with increased odds of progression from second- to third-line therapy were assessed. Secondary outcomes included median time for progression to third-line therapy and third-line therapy utilization across subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 641,122 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in analysis. Of these, only 7487 (1.2%) received third-line therapy after receiving second-line therapy. On multivariate analysis, patients aged 65 to 79, women, White race, history of dual anticholinergic and ß3 agonist therapy, metropolitan area, government insurance, and single specialty practice had the greatest odds of progressing to third-line therapy. Black and Asian race, male gender, and rural setting had lower odds of progressing to third-line therapy. BTX-A was the most common therapy overall (40% BTX-A, 32% sacral neuromodulation, 28% percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation). The median time of progression from second- to third-line therapy was 15.4 months (IQR 5.9, 32.4). Patients < 50 years old and women progressed fastest to third-line therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Very few patients received third-line therapies, and the time to progression from second- to third-line therapies is > 1 year. The study findings highlight a potential need to improve third-line therapy implementation.

Effects of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Women Refractory to and Never Used Pharmacological Agents for Idiopathic Overactive Bladder.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) on quality of life (QoL) and clinical parameters related to incontinence in pharmacological agents (PhAs) naive and refractory women with idiopathic overactive bladder (iOAB). METHODS: In this prospective nonrandomized clinical trial, women with resistance to PhAs were included in the first group (n=21), PhA-naive women were included in the second group (n=21). TTNS was performed 2 days a week, a total of 12 sessions for 6 weeks. Every session lasted 30 min. Women were evaluated for the severity of incontinence (Pad test), 3-day voiding diary (voiding frequency, nocturia, incontinence episodes, and number of pads), symptom severity (Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-V8), quality of life (Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7), treatment satisfaction, positive response, and cure-improvement rates. RESULTS: A statistically significant improvement was found in all parameters for each group at the 6th week compared with the baseline values (p<0.05). It was found that the severity of incontinence, incontinence episodes, symptom severity, treatment satisfaction, and QoL parameters were significantly improved in PhA-naive group compared with the PhA-resistant group at the 6th week (p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of voiding, nocturia, and number of pads between the two groups (p>0.05). Positive response rates, the primary outcome measure, were statistically significantly higher in the PhA-naive group than in the PhA-resistant group. CONCLUSIONS: Although TTNS is more effective in PhA-naive women with iOAB, it appears to be an effective therapy that can also be used in the management of PhA-resistant women with iOAB.

Immediate and Long-Term Effects of Tibial Nerve Stimulation on the Sexual Behavior of Female Rats.

OBJECTIVES: There are limited treatment options for female sexual dysfunction (FSD). Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) has shown improvements in FSD symptoms in neuromodulation clinical studies, but the direct effects on sexual function are not understood. This study evaluated the immediate and long-term effects of PTNS on sexual motivation and receptivity in a rat model of menopausal women. Our primary hypothesis was that long-term PTNS would yield greater changes in sexual behavior than short-term stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In two experiments, after receiving treatment, we placed ovariectomized female rats in an operant chamber in which the female controls access to a male by nose poking. We used five treatment conditions, which were with or without PTNS and no, partial, or full hormone priming. In experiment 1, we rotated rats through each condition twice with behavioral testing immediately following treatment for ten weeks. In experiment 2, we committed rats to one condition for six weeks and tracked sexual behavior over time. We quantified sexual motivation and sexual receptivity with standard measures. RESULTS: No primary comparisons were significant in this study. In experiment 1, we observed increased sexual motivation but not receptivity immediately following PTNS with partial hormone priming, as compared with priming without PTNS (linear mixed effect models; initial latency [p = 0.34], inter-interval latency [p = 0.77], nose poke frequency [p = 0.084]; eight rats). In experiment 2, we observed trends of increased sexual receptivity (linear correlation for weekly group means; mounts [p = 0.094 for trendline], intromissions [p = 0.073], lordosis quotient [p = 0.58], percent time spent with a male [p = 0.39], decreased percent time alone [p = 0.024]; four rats per condition), and some sexual motivation metrics (linear correlation for weekly group means; nose pokes per interval [p = 0.050], nose poke frequency [p = 0.039], decreased initial latency [p = 0.11]; four rats per condition) when PTNS was applied long-term with partial hormone priming, as compared with hormone-primed rats without stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: PTNS combined with hormone priming shows potential for increasing sexual motivation in the short-term and sexual receptivity in the long-term in rats. Further studies are needed to examine variability in rat behavior and to investigate PTNS as a treatment for FSD in menopausal women.

Response to tibial and sacral nerve modulation in overactive bladder: Is there any correlation?

OBJECTIVES: To assess the correlation between the response to transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) and subsequent response to sacral nerve modulation (SNM) to treat overactive bladder (OAB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who consecutively received TTNS followed by a two-stage SNM between January 2016 and June 2022 to treat OAB in two university hospital centers were included. The response to each therapy was evaluated with success defined by a 50% or greater improvement in one or more bothersome urinary symptoms from baseline. The primary endpoint was the statistical relationship between the response to TTNS and the response to SNM, assessed by logistic regression. Secondary endpoints were the statistical relationship between the response to TTNS and the response to SNM when controlling for gender, age (<57 years vs. >57 years), presence of an underlying neurological disease, and presence of DO, adding the factor and interaction to the previous regression model. RESULTS: Among the 92 patients enrolled in the study, 68 of them were women (73.9%), and the median age was 57.0 [41.0-69.0] years. The success was reported in 22 patients (23.9%) under TTNS and 66 patients (71.7%) during the SNM test phase. There was no statistical correlation between response to TTNS and response to SNM in the overall population (confidence interval: 95% [0.48-4.47], p = 0.51). Similarly, there was no statistical correlation when controlling for age <57 years or ≥57 years, with p = 1.0 and p = 0.69, respectively. No statistical study could be conducted for the other subpopulations due to small sample sizes. CONCLUSION: The response to TTNS does not predict the response to SNM in the treatment of OAB. TTNS and SNM should be considered as separate therapies, and the decision-making process for OAB treatment should take this into account.

Long-Term Outcome of Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Functional Non-Retentive Fecal Incontinence in Children.

BACKGROUND: Functional non-retentive fecal incontinence (FNRFI) is a psychologically upsetting and embarrassing issue and affects children's quality of life negatively. AIM OF THIS STUDY: Evaluation of the short and long-term effect of Bilateral transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (BTPTNS) in the treatment of FNRFI in children and its impact on the quality of life (QoL). Methodology: The current randomized controlled study included 94 Children with FNRFI who were randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group A received BTPTNS and Group B Received Sham BTPTNS. Follow-up was planned for 24 months for manometric findings, incontinence score, Incontinence episodes, and the QoL. RESULTS: The incontinence score was significantly decreases in Group A more than what was reported in Group B at 6, 12, 24 months follow up . In group A 53.2% of the included children who received BTPTNS showed a decrease in the incontinence episodes more than 75% and among them, 23.4% were fully continent. All the QoL domains were significantly improved in Group A after 6, 12, and 24 months when compared with Group B. CONCLUSION: BTPTNS can be a good modality in the treatment of FNRFI with favorable long-term maintenance of its effect together with a remarkable positive impact on all domains of QoL.

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation With a High-Frequency Electromagnetic Coupled Powered Implanted Receiver at the Posterior Tibial Nerve for the Treatment of Chronic Pain in the Foot.

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral neuropathy has several causes, with diabetes being the most common. Conservative management may fail to control pain. Our study aimed at evaluating the use of peripheral nerve stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve for treating peripheral neuropathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an observational study of 15 patients who received peripheral nerve stimulation at the posterior tibial nerve to treat peripheral neuropathy. Outcomes measured were improvement of pain scores and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12 months compared with before the implant. RESULTS: Mean pain scores with the verbal rating scale were 3 ± 1.8 at >12 months compared with 8.6 ± 1.2 at baseline, a reduction of 65% (p < 0.001). Median satisfaction with the PGIC at >12 months was 7 of 7, with most subjects reporting a 6 (better) or a 7 (a great deal better). CONCLUSION: Peripheral nerve stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve can be a safe and effective modality for treating chronic pain symptoms related to peripheral neuropathy of the foot.

Pilot Study of a Novel At-Home Posterior Tibial Nerve System for Overactive Bladder Syndrome.

IMPORTANCE: Urgency urinary incontinence and overactive bladder are common conditions. Third-line therapies are often underutilized because of either being too invasive or being burdensome for the patient. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the efficacy and acceptability of a noninvasive, home-based posterior tibial nerve treatment system for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: In this pilot study, 10 postmenopausal women with urgency urinary incontinence were given the SoleStim System for home-based posterior tibial nerve stimulation. Symptoms at baseline and completion of the 8-week study were determined by 3-day voiding diary and quality-of-life questionnaire (Overactive Bladder Questionnaire) to assess for reduction in incontinence episodes. RESULTS: All patients were 100% adherent to the SoleStim System application over the 8-week period and reported statistically significant reductions in the mean number of voids (-16.3%, P = 0.022), urgency episodes (-31.2%, P = 0.02), and urgency urinary incontinence episodes (-31.4%, P = 0.045). Forty percent of participants reported a decrease of ≥50% in their urgency urinary incontinence episodes. SoleStim was scored a value of 1.8 ± 2.0 (mean ± SD) on a 10-point usability scale, indicating that it was highly acceptable from an ease-of-use perspective. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The SoleStim System improved key overactive bladder (frequency, urgency, and urgency urinary incontinence episodes) and quality-of-life metrics. The results from this pilot study suggest that the SoleStim System may be a safe, effective, and highly acceptable at-home overactive bladder therapy.

Mechanism of Action of Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) has long been used to effectively treat lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). Although numerous studies have concentrated on TNS, its mechanism of action remains elusive. This review aimed to concentrate on the mechanism of action of TNS against LUTD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed on October 31, 2022. In this study, we introduced the application of TNS for LUTD, summarized different methods used in exploring the mechanism of TNS, and discussed the next direction to investigate the mechanism of TNS. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In this review, 97 studies, including clinical studies, animal experiments, and reviews, were used. TNS is an effective treatment for LUTD. The study of its mechanisms primarily concentrated on the central nervous system, tibial nerve pathway, receptors, and TNS frequency. More advanced equipment will be used in human experiments to investigate the central mechanism, and diverse animal experiments will be performed to explore the peripheral mechanism and parameters of TNS in the future.

Effects of Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation on Fecal Incontinence: An Umbrella Review.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to summarize relevant data from previous systematic reviews (SRs) and conduct comprehensive research on the clinical effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), via the transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (TPTNS) or percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PPTNS) method on fecal incontinence (FI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. We included English-language, full-text SRs reporting outcomes for FI following either PPTNS or TPTNS. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. In addition, reanalyzing the meta-analyses was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software version 3.0 to achieve effect sizes and the level of statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: From a total of 835 citations, 14 SRs met our inclusion criteria. Four of these also conducted a meta-analysis. Most SRs reported an overall improvement in different study parameters, including bowel habits and quality of life. However, there were major inconsistencies across the results. The most studied outcome was FI episodes, followed by incontinence score. The summary outcomes showed no statistically significant changes in comparing PTNS with sham or sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for FI (p > 0.05). However, the results of subgroup analysis based on the type of intervention in the control group revealed that FI episodes were significantly fewer than in the PTNS arm, whereas PTNS led to fewer episodes of FI than did the sham. In terms of incontinence score, the results showed that PTNS compared with sham did not change the incontinence score; however, SNS improved the score significantly in one eligible study for reanalysis when compared with PTNS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current umbrella review suggest that PTNS can potentially benefit patients with FI. However, this is concluded from studies with a limited population, disregarding the etiology of FI and with limited follow-up duration. Therefore, caution must be taken in contemplating the results.

What Is in the Pipeline on Investigational Neuromodulation Techniques for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Narrative Review.

OBJECTIVES: Overactive bladder (OAB) affects millions of patients worldwide. Its treatment is challenging but improves the patient's quality of life. Besides standard techniques for neuromodulation (sacral and pudendal neuromodulation and posterior tibial nerve stimulation), several new techniques have been investigated to treat symptoms of refractory OAB. The purpose of the present review is to outline the state of the art of new neuromodulation techniques for lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In March 2023, a comprehensive MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus search was carried out (keywords: LUTD, new technologies, neuromodulation, LUTS, OAB, painful bladder syndromes, etc). Articles were included according to inclusion (randomized controlled trials, prospective trials, large retrospective studies) and exclusion (case reports, outcomes not clearly expressed in full text, animal studies) criteria. The reference lists of the included studies also were scanned. Both adult and pediatric populations were included, in addition to both neurogenic and nonneurogenic OAB. A narrative review was then performed. RESULTS: Peroneal neuromodulation, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, magnetic nerve stimulation, and parasacral transcutaneous neuromodulation are the most studied investigative techniques and were shown to yield promising results in treating OAB symptoms. Most studies showed promising results even in the complex scenarios of patients with OAB refractory to standard treatments. Comparing investigational techniques with standard of care and their respective clinical outcomes and safety profiles, and confronting their pros and cons, we reasonably believe that once such treatment modalities are further developed, they could play a role in the OAB treatment algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Although the described neuromodulation techniques are being intensely studied, the available results are not yet sufficient for any guidelines to recommend their use.

Effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) on lower urinary tract dysfunction: An umbrella review.

BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) is a common, troublesome condition that often negatively affects patients' quality of life. Current literature has long been interested in how posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) can affect this condition. AIM: To extensively and systematically explore how PTNS affects LUTD based on the most recent systematic reviews. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All the systematic reviews, with or without meta-analysis that assessed the effects of PTNS on LUTD were retrieved. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool, and analysis was conducted using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 3 tool. RESULTS: From a total of 3077 citations, 20 systematic reviews entered this study, and 13 of them included meta-analysis. The population of studies varied vastly, for instance, some studies included only children or women while other focused on a specific pathology like multiple sclerosis-induced neurogenic LUTD. The majority of included studies reported an overall improvement in LUTD following percutaneous PTNS, although admitting that these results were derived from moderate to low-quality evidence. CONCLUSION: The findings of this thorough umbrella review showed that the positive benefits of PTNS in treating LUTD are currently supported by low-quality evidence, and it is crucial to interpret them with great care.

How I Do It: Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation TENSI+ system.

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition that significantly impacts the quality of life (QoL), well-being and daily functioning for both men and women. Among various treatments, peripheral tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) emerges as an effective third-line treatment for OAB symptoms, with options for either a percutaneous approach (P-PTNS) or by transcutaneous delivery (T-PTNS). Recent studies have shown negligible differences between P-PTNS and T-PTNS efficacy in alleviating urinary urgency and frequency and QoL improvement and, overall no difference in efficacy over antimuscarinic regimens. The TENSI+ system offers a cutting-edge transcutaneous approach, allowing patients to self-administer treatment conveniently at home with electrical stimulation delivery through surface electrodes. It stands out for its ease of preparation, tolerability, and high levels of patient satisfaction. Prospective multicentric data highlights TENSI+ to be an effective and safe treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms with high treatment adherence at 3 months. This paper aims to familiarize readers with the TENSI+ system, current studies, device assembly, operation, and treatment recommendations.

Cost consequence analysis of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) for urinary incontinence in care home residents alongside a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence (UI) is prevalent in more than half of residents of nursing and residential care homes and can have a detrimental impact on dignity and quality of life. Care homes predominantly use absorbent pads to contain UI rather than actively treat the condition. Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) is a non-invasive, safe, low-cost intervention with demonstrated effectiveness for reducing UI in adults. We examined the costs and consequences of delivering TTNS to care home residents in comparison to sham (inactive) electrical stimulation. METHODS: A cost consequence analysis approach was used to assemble and present the resource use and outcome data for the ELECTRIC trial which randomised 406 residents with UI from 37 care homes in the United Kingdom to receive 12 sessions of 30 min of either TTNS or sham (inactive) TTNS. TTNS was administered by care home staff over 6 weeks. Health state utility was measured using DEMQOL-U and DEMQOL-PROXY-U at baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks follow-up. Staff completed a resource use questionnaire at baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks follow-up, which also assessed use of absorbent pads. RESULTS: HRQoL did not change significantly in either randomised group. Delivery of TTNS was estimated to cost £81.20 per participant, plus training and support costs of £121.03 per staff member. 85% of participants needed toilet assistance as routine, on average requiring one or two staff members to be involved 4 or 5 times in each 24 h. Daily use of mobility aids and other assistive devices to use the toilet were reported. The value of staff time to assist residents to use the toilet (assuming an average of 5 min per resident per visit) was estimated as £19.17 (SD 13.22) for TTNS and £17.30 (SD 13.33) for sham (per resident in a 24-hour period). CONCLUSIONS: Use of TTNS to treat UI in care home residents did not lead to changes in resource use, particularly any reduction in the use of absorbent pads and no cost benefits for TTNS were shown. Managing continence in care homes is labour intensive, requiring both high levels of staff time and use of equipment aids. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN98415244, registered 25/04/2018. NCT03248362 (Clinical trial.gov number), registered 14/08//2017.

Our 11-Year Experience With Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Men and Women for the Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). METHODS: Retrospective chart review was completed for patients with at least 10 weekly treatments of PTNS from January 2010 to October 2021. PTNS success was defined as conversion to PTNS maintenance therapy following 12weeks of PTNS induction therapy. Data were analyzed using GraphPad. RESULTS: Over the 11-year study period, 27 out of 34 patients (mean age 52.9 ± 16.8years; 25 females, 9 males) completed 12weeks of PTNS induction therapy, and 48.1% (13/27) successfully converted to PTNS maintenance therapy. Following 12weeks of PTNS induction therapy, significant improvements were noted in the urgency severity scale (range 0-4: 2.9 ± 1.2 before vs 1.1 ± 1.1 after PTNS, P = .001) and nocturnal urinary frequency (number of voids: 3.3 ± 1.9 before vs 2.2 ± 1.6 after PTNS, P = .041); and nonsignificant improvements were noted in daytime void frequency (hours: 1.5 ± 0.7 before vs 2.0 ± 0.9 after PTNS, P = .090) and the pain domain of the interstitial cystitis symptoms index (question 4, range 0-4: 2.5 ± 1.4 before vs 1.3 ± 1.8 after PTNS, P = .082). CONCLUSION: Our sample size is among the largest sample of PTNS in IC/BPS from a single center. While PTNS achieved nonsignificant improvements in pain and daytime void frequency, significant improvements were observed in urinary urgency and nocturia. PTNS appears to be a plausible option in the multimodal approach to managing IC/BPS.

Efficacy and safety of the TENSI+ device for posterior tibial nerve stimulation: A multicenter, retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (TC-PTNS) is a validated option for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) management, with a short-term success rate of around 60% and few adverse events. Our goal was to report the efficacy and safety results of TC-PTNS using the newly issued device TENSI+ for LUTS management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted in 7 urology departments in France. All patients treated with TC-PTNS for LUTS using the TENSI+ device between September 2021 and February 2022 were included. All patients received supervised at-home training by a specialized nurse. All patients were asked to do daily, 20minutes sessions of TC-PTNS. Patient demographics, history, initial symptoms and previous treatment were collected at inclusion. A follow-up visit was scheduled at 3 months. Efficacy was evaluated through treatment persistence at 3 months and PGI-I (Patient Global Impression of Improvement) score. Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients (86 women and 17 men) were included. All patients had overactive bladder symptoms, 64 suffered from urgency incontinence, and 24 had associated voiding symptoms. Eighteen patients had neurogenic background, and 30 previously received anticholinergics. After a median follow-up of 12 [10-21]weeks, 70 patients were still using the device (68%). PGI-I score reflected an improvement in 70.9% and was 1, 2 and 3 in 28, 26 and 19 patients respectively, while 24 were unchanged and 6 were worse. No clinical baseline parameter was predictive of success. Adverse events included pain at stimulation site (two cases) and pelvic pain (two patients), which rapidly resolved after treatment interruption. CONCLUSIONS: TC-PTNS with TENSI+ device is an effective option for LUTS management, with results that seem similar to other TC-PTNS approaches. Adverse events were mild and reversible after treatment interruption.

Transcutaneous medial plantar nerve stimulation in women with idiopathic overactive bladder.

PURPOSE: To define transcutaneous medial plantar nerve stimulation (T-MPNS) as a new neuromodulation method and assess the efficacy of T-MPNS on quality of life (QoL) and clinical parameters associated with incontinence in women with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one women were included in this study. All women received T-MPNS. Two self-adhesive surface electrodes were positioned with the negative electrode near the metatarsal-phalangeal joint of the great toe on the medial aspect of the foot and the positive electrode 2 cm inferior-posterior of the medial malleolus (in front of the medio-malleolar-calcaneal axis). T-MPNS was performed 2 days a week, 30 minutes a day, for a total of 12 sessions for 6 weeks. Women were evaluated for incontinence severity (24-h pad test), 3-day voiding diary, symptom severity (Overactive Bladder Questionnaire [OAB-V8]), QoL (Quality of Life-Incontinence Impact Questionnaire [IIQ-7]), positive response and cure-improvement rates, and treatment satisfaction at baseline and at the 6th week. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvement was found in the severity of incontinence, frequency of voiding, incontinence episodes, nocturia, number of pads, symptom severity, and QoL parameters at the 6th week compared with baseline. Treatment satisfaction, treatment success, and cure or improvement rates were found to be high at the 6th week. CONCLUSIONS: T-MPNS was first described in the literature as a new neuromodulation method. We conclude that T-MPNS is effective on both clinical parameters and QoL associated with incontinence in women with idiopathic OAB. Randomized controlled multicenter studies are needed to validate the effectiveness of T-MPNS.