RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The world wide web provides new options to physicians in terms practice marketing, information brokerage, and process optimization. This study explores prevalence and content of homepages of neurologists, psychiatrists and medical psychotherapists in private practice. METHODS: Through the legal bodies of physicians in private practice in six northern German states neurologists, psychiatrists and medical psychotherapists were identified. According to a standardized and operationalized criteria catalogue, homepages were rated. RESULTS: 1804 physicians were identified, 352 (19.5â%) had operated a homepage. Higher frequencies of homepages found for male physicians (vs. female physicians), practice centres (vs. single practices) and urban practices (vs. rural practices). In average, practices reached 18.8 (±â5.3) of 42 points; contact data and accessibility information were generally available; information as to qualification and specialization was provided more infrequently. Legal specifications were not considered in more than every second homepage, interactive elements like online appointment of follow-up prescription were only rarely offered. CONCLUSIONS: Only every fifth neurological or psychiatric practice operates an own homepage, higher competition (urban area) and higher professionalization (practice centres) seem to act as promotors. The legal framework has to be focused, and patient needs should be taken into account.
Asunto(s)
Internet , Comercialización de los Servicios de Salud , Neurología , Práctica Privada , Psiquiatría , Psicoterapia , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Difusión de la Información , Internet/legislación & jurisprudencia , Masculino , Comercialización de los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Programas Nacionales de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Neurología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Práctica Privada/legislación & jurisprudencia , Psiquiatría/legislación & jurisprudencia , Psicoterapia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Factores Sexuales , Programas Informáticos , Interfaz Usuario-ComputadorAsunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Competencia Clínica , Neurología/normas , Medicina Osteopática/legislación & jurisprudencia , Médicos Osteopáticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prejuicio , Humanos , Neurología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Percepción Social , Consejos de Especialidades , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Voluntad en Vida/legislación & jurisprudencia , Órdenes de Resucitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sociedades Médicas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Privación de Tratamiento/normas , Factores de Edad , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución/normas , Formularios de Consentimiento/legislación & jurisprudencia , Formularios de Consentimiento/normas , Humanos , Tutores Legales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tutores Legales/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados para Prolongación de la Vida/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cuidados para Prolongación de la Vida/normas , Neurología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Neurología/normas , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Privación de Tratamiento/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Trace the medical-legal involvement of the 19th century clinical neurologist Jean-Martin Charcot. BACKGROUND: The two major neurologic concerns of the 1800s that involved legal questions were topics of particular academic interest to Charcot: post-traumatic neurologic syndromes and the behavioral consequences of hysteria and hypnotism. Although Charcot's medical views influenced several nonmedical fields, including art, poetry, and drama, his impact on medical-legal issues has not been examined. METHODS: Original documents from the Bibliothèque Charcot at the Salpêtrière Hospital in Paris, legal documents, and publications from Charcot's era were examined. RESULTS: Although his involvement in medical-legal affairs was a modest element of Charcot's multifaceted career, he was involved in four different types of medical-legal activities: as a cited authority in the medical-legal literature, as an author of articles within medical-legal contexts, as a subpoenaed expert consultant, and as an expert examiner. CONCLUSIONS: Charcot's involvement demonstrates the long tradition of an interface between neurology and legal medicine and provides a model for highly limited but authoritative involvement by academic neurologists in medical-legal affairs.