[Nimodipine in treatment of bipolar disorder]. / Primenenie nimodipina v terapii bipolyarnogo affektivnogo rasstroistva.

The purpose of this review is to correlate current data on the molecular mechanisms of action of the drug Nimodipine with its clinical effects and applicability in mental disorders belonging to the spectrum of affective pathology. The article discusses the prospects for using the calcium channel blocker nimodipine as a method of both mono and combination therapy for bipolar disorders with various types of course. Nimodipine is a selective blocker of voltage-dependent calcium channels, a dihydropyridine derivative. By blocking L type calcium channels, it prevents the entry of calcium ions into the cell. Due to its pronounced ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier, it has a selective effect on brain neurons and has a vasodilating, antihypertensive and normotimic effect. Nimodipine blocks LTCC channels in brain neurons, thereby influencing synaptic plasticity, transmitter release and excitation-transcription coupling, which makes it possible to influence various clinical conditions with pathology in the area of affect, including bipolar disorders with ultra-rapid cycling, and also, in cases with high resistance and intolerance to other mood stabilizers.

Evaluation of DeGIR registry data on endovascular treatment of cerebral vasospasm in Germany 2018-2021: an overview of the current care situation. / Auswertung der DeGIR-Registerdaten zur endovaskulären Therapie von zerebralen Vasospasmen in Deutschland 2018­2021: Ein Überblick über die aktuelle Versorgungssituation.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of endovascular therapies for cerebral vasospasm (CVS) documented in the DeGIR registry from 2018-2021 to analyse the current clinical care situation in Germany. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the clinical and procedural data on endovascular spasm therapies (EST) documented anonymously in the DeGIR registry. We analysed: pre-interventional findings of CTP and consciousness; radiation dose applied, interventional-technical parameters (local medication, devices, angiographic result), post-interventional symptoms, complications and mortality. RESULTS: 3584 patients received a total of 7628 EST (median age/patient: 53 [range: 13-100, IQR: 44-60], 68.2 % women) in 91 (2018), 92 (2019), 100 (2020) and 98 (2021) centres; 5388 (70.6 %) anterior circulation and 378 (5 %) posterior circulation (both involved in 1862 cases [24.4 %]). EST was performed once in 2125 cases (27.9 %), with a mean of 2.1 EST/patient. In 7476 times, purely medicated EST were carried out (nimodipine: 6835, papaverine: 401, nitroglycerin: 62, other drug not specified: 239; combinations: 90). Microcatheter infusions were documented in 1132 times (14.8 %). Balloon angioplasty (BA) (additional) was performed in 756 EST (9.9 %), other mechanical recanalisations in 154 cases (2 %) and stenting in 176 of the EST (2.3 %). The median dose area product during ET was 4069 cGycm² (drug: 4002/[+]BA: 8003 [p < 0.001]). At least 1 complication occurred in 95 of all procedures (1.2 %) (drug: 1.1 %/[+]BA: 4.2 % [p < 0.001]). Mortality associated with EST was 0.2 % (n = 18). After EST, overall improvement or elimination of CVS was found in 94.2 % of cases (drug: 93.8 %/[+]BA: 98.1 % [p < 0.001]). In a comparison of the locally applied drugs, papaverine eliminated CVS more frequently than nimodipine (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: EST have a moderate radiation exposure and can be performed with few complications. Purely medicated EST are predominantly performed, especially with nimodipine. With (additional) BA, radiation exposure, complication rates and angiographic results are higher or better. When considering drug EST alone, there is evidence for an advantage of papaverine over nimodipine, but a different group size has to be taken into account. In the analysis of EST, the DeGIR registry data are suitable for answering more specific questions, especially due to the large number of cases; for this purpose, further subgroupings should be sought in the data documentation. KEY POINTS: · In Germany, there are currently no guidelines for the endovascular treatment of cerebral vasospasm following spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage.. · In addition to oral nimodipine administration endovascular therapy is used to treat cerebral vasospasm in most hospitals.. · This is the first systematic evaluation of nationwide registry data on endovascular treatment of cerebral vasopasm in Germany.. · This real-world data shows that endovascular treatment for cerebral vasospasm has a moderate radiation exposure and can be performed with few complications overall. With (additional) balloon angioplasty, radiation exposure, complication rates and angiographic therapy results are higher or better.. CITATION FORMAT: · Neumann A, Weber W, Küchler J et al. Evaluation of DeGIR registry data on endovascular treatment of cerebral vasospasm in Germany 2018-2021: an overview of the current care situation. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 1018 - 1026.

Verapamil in the treatment of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Extrapolating from efficacy in subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), nimodipine has been used as a treatment for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS). However, 4-hourly dosing is a practical limitation and verapamil has been proposed as an alternative. The potential efficacy, adverse effects, preferred dosing and formulation of verapamil for RCVS have not been systematically reviewed previously. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted of the databases PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to July 2022 for peer-reviewed articles describing the use of verapamil for RCVS. This systematic review adheres to the PRISMA guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO. RESULTS: There were 58 articles included in the review, which included 56 patients with RCVS treated with oral verapamil and 15 patients treated with intra-arterial verapamil. The most common oral verapamil dosing regimen was controlled release 120 mg once daily. There were 54/56 patients described to have improvement in headache following oral verapamil and one patient who died from worsening RCVS. Only 2/56 patients noted possible adverse effects with oral verapamil, with none requiring discontinuation. There was one case of hypotension from combined oral and intra-arterial verapamil. Vascular complications including ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke were recorded in 33/56 patients. RCVS recurrence was described in 9 patients, with 2 cases upon weaning oral verapamil. CONCLUSIONS: While no randomised studies exist to support the use of verapamil in RCVS, observational data support a possible clinical benefit. Verapamil appears well tolerated in this setting and represents a reasonable treatment option. Randomised controlled trials including comparison with nimodipine are warranted.

Effect of intra-arterial nimodipine on iatrogenic vasospasms during endovascular stroke treatment - angiographic resolution and infarct growth in follow-up imaging.

PURPOSE: The treatment of vasospasms during endovascular stroke treatment (EST) with intra-arterial nimodipine (NM) is routinely performed. However, the efficacy of resolving iatrogenic vasospasms during the angiographic intervention and the infarct development in follow-up imaging after EST has not been studied yet. METHODS: Retrospective single-center analysis of patients receiving EST for anterior circulation vessel occlusion between 01/2015 and 12/2021. The primary endpoint was ASPECTS in follow-up imaging. Secondary endpoints were the clinical outcome (combined endpoint NIHSS 24 h after EST and difference between modified Rankin Scale (mRS) before stroke and at discharge (delta mRS)) and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in follow-up imaging. Patients with vasospasms receiving NM (NM+) or not (NM-) were compared in univariate analysis. RESULTS: Vasospasms occurred in 79/1283 patients (6.2%), who consecutively received intra-arterial NM during EST. The targeted vasospasm angiographically resolved in 84% (66/79) under NM therapy. ASPECTS was lower in follow-up imaging after vasospasms and NM-treatment (NM - 7 (6-9), NM + 6 (4.5-8), p = 0.013) and the clinical outcome was worse (NIHSS 24 h after EST was higher in patients treated with NM (median, IQR; NM+: 14, 5-21 vs. NM-: 9, 3-18; p = 0.004), delta-mRS was higher in the NM + group (median, IQR; NM+: 3, 1-4 vs. NM-: 2, 1-2; p = 0.011)). Any ICH (NM+: 27/79, 34.2% vs. NM-: 356/1204, 29.6%; p = 0.386) and symptomatic ICH (NM+: 2/79, 2.5% vs. NM-: 21/1204, 1.7%; p = 0.609) was equally distributed between groups. CONCLUSION: Intra-arterial nimodipine during EST resolves iatrogenic vasospasms efficiently during EST without increasing intracranial hemorrhage rates. However, patients with vasospasms and NM treatment show higher infarct growth resulting in lower ASPECTS in follow-up imaging.

The therapeutic role of Jingchuan tablet on ischaemic cerebral stroke via the HIF-1α/EPO/VEGFA signalling pathway.

CONTEXT: Jingchuan tablet (JCT) is a Chinese medicine prescription for treating ischaemic cerebral stroke (ICS). However, its relevant mechanisms remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To unravel the intrinsic mechanisms of JCT anti-ICS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 'Hongjingtian', 'chuanxiong', 'yanhusuo', 'bingpian', 'cerebral infarction', 'cerebral ischemia' or 'stroke' were used as keywords, and then components, targets and underlying mechanisms of JCT anti-ICS were analysed in TCMSP, TTD, DrugBank, STRING and Metascape databases up to June 2020. Male Sprague-Dawley rats under permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO) model, randomly assigned as: model, sham, nimodipine (0.012 g/kg/d) and JCT (0.78, 1.56 and 3.12 g/kg/d) groups, received oral gavage administration for a week. Therapeutic effects were evaluated by detecting the proportion of cerebral infarction, neuronal apoptosis and neurological deficits. Bioactive components were detected by HPLC-MS. Molecular biology and computational docking were used to verify the underlying mechanisms. RESULTS: Eighty-one components, 166 targets and HIF-1α/EPO/VEGFA pathway contributed to the anti-ICS effect of JCT. JCT treatment effectively reduced the proportion of cerebral infarction (33.13%), apoptosis rate (14.80%) and neurobehavioural score (2.00). JCT increased the protein levels of HIF-1α (0.84), EPO (0.64) and VEGFA (0.69), respectively (p < 0.05). Gallic acid, salidroside, chlorogenic acid, ethyl gallate, ferulic acid and tetrahydropalmatine detected by HPLC-MS showed good interaction and binding with HIF-1α/EPO/VEGFA. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated the mechanisms of JCT anti-ICS associated with the activation of the HIF-1α/EPO/VEGFA pathway, which provided a pharmacological basis for expanding the clinical application and some scientific ideas for further research into the material basis JCT anti-ICS.

Efficacy of nimodipine in the treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is an uncommon and serious subtype of stroke, which leads to the loss of the patient's ability to produce and live for many years. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effect of nimodipine in the treatment of SAH. METHODS: Electronic databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, SinoMed, China Master's Theses Full-text Database (CMFD), China Doctoral Dissertations Full-text Database (CDFD), Cochrane Library, PubMed and Embase were searched from 2010 and 2021. All randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of nimodipine in the treatment of SAH were included in our meta-analysis. The patients were divided into control group and treatment group. Meta-analysis was performed with Stata16.0 software. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies were included. Compared with the control group, the treatment group had higher effective rate (OR = 3.21, 95% CI: 2.25, 4.58; p < 0.001), and lower incidence of adverse reactions (OR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.67; p = 0.001). Before treatment, no significant differences were identified in middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity and Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score between the two groups. However, after treatment, the middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (SMD = -1.36, 95% CI: -2.28, -0.49; p = 0.002) and GCS score (SMD = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.58, 1.89; p < 0.001) in the treatment group were significantly better than those in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Nimodipine is effective in the treatment of SAH, lowering incidence of adverse reactions and therefore improving the prognosis of patients.

ANTECEDENTES: Hemorragia subaracnóidea (SAH) é um subtipo raro e grave de acidente vascular cerebral (AVC), o que leva à perda da capacidade do paciente de produzir e viver por muitos anos. OBJETIVO: Investigar o efeito clínico da nimodipina no tratamento da SAH. MéTODOS: As bases de dados eletrônicas, incluindo a China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, SinoMed, Masters Theses Full-text Database (CMFD), China Doctoral Dissertations Full-text Database (CDFD), Cochrane Library, PubMed e Embase foram pesquisadas no período de 2010 a 2021. Todos os ensaios controlados aleatorizados que avaliam a eficácia da nimodipina no tratamento da SAH foram incluídos na nossa meta-análise. Os pacientes foram divididos em grupo controle e grupo de tratamento. Meta-análise foi realizada com o software Stata 16.0. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos um total de dez estudos. Em comparação com o grupo controle, o grupo de tratamento tinha uma taxa mais elevada (OR = 3,21, 95% CI: 2,25, 4,58; p < 0,001), e menor incidência de reações adversas (OR = 0,35, 95% CI: 0,19, 0,67; p = 0,001). Antes do tratamento, não foram identificadas diferenças significativas na velocidade média do fluxo sanguíneo da artéria cerebral e na pontuação de Glasgow coma scale (GCS) entre os dois grupos. No entanto, após o tratamento, a velocidade média do fluxo sanguíneo da artéria cerebral (SMD = −1,36, 95% CI: −2,28, 0,49; p = 0,002) e a pontuação do GCS (SMD = 1,24, 95% CI: 0,58, 1,89; p < 0,001) no grupo de tratamento foram significativamente melhores do que os do grupo controle. CONCLUSõES: A nimodipina é eficaz no tratamento da SAH, diminuindo a incidência de reações adversas e, consequentemente, melhorando o prognóstico dos doentes.

Treatment and outcomes of non-aneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid haemorrhage: A 5 year retrospective study in a tertiary care centre.

PURPOSE: Perimesencephalic Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (PMSAH) is an uncommon type of SAH. Severity of PMSAH can be graded by the presence of blood in the Sylvian fissure. No study compares the outcomes from PMSAH with blood present or absent in the Sylvian fissure. Furthermore, the use of Nimodipine lacks evidence base in PMSAH. We investigated whether continuing Nimodipine to 21 days in PMSAH with or without blood in the Sylvian fissure made any significant difference to patient outcome. METHODS: Retrospective study of 93 cases admitted to tertiary centre from 2016 to 2020. We compared prevalence of cases with blood in Sylvian fissure, and analysed outcomes including complications and changes to patient modified rankin scale (MRS). We also audited use of Nimodipine in these cases and analysed whether Nimodipine made any significant difference in preventing complications. RESULTS: 91 % of PMSAH were grade 1, 24 cases (26 %) had blood in the Sylvian fissure. Sylvian fissure positive (Sylvian-positive) cases were statistically significantly more likely to have higher rates of complication compared to Sylvian fissure negative (Sylvian-negative) cases. Our centre stopped Nimodipine 56 % of the time in Sylvian-negative cases and 45 % of the time in Sylvian-positive cases. There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes when Nimodipine was continued to 21 days or ceased after negative angiogram; this result extended to both Sylvian-positive and Sylvian-negative subgroups when directly comparing Sylvian-positive cases with each other and Sylvian-negative cases likewise. DISCUSSION: Sylvian-positive cases have a significantly higher rate of complication, as well as an increase in MRS. This may be because of the inflammatory properties of haemoglobin in the subarachnoid space post-bleed. Furthermore, acknowledging the limitations of our retrospective data, we did not find a statistically significant difference in continuing Nimodipine to 21 days with relation to PMSAH outcomes in all subgroups.

A systematic review of the efficacy of donepezil hydrochloride combined with nimodipine on treating vascular dementia.

BACKGROUND: Vascular dementia (VaD) is a comprehensive syndrome related to the damage of cognitive function and various cerebral vascular illnesses. VaD is also generally recognized as the second most common type of dementia after Alzheimer disease, contributing to 30% of the dementia population in Asia and developing countries. The ability of donepezil hydrochloride and nimodipine had been respectively proven in improving cognitive function in vascular dementia. However, whether the combined application of both drugs contribute to better efficacy remains as a research hotspot. Studies had shown definite satisfactory result with such combination, however evidence-based evaluation of the efficacy is still lacking. Therefore, meta-analysis is employed in this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using donepezil hydrochloride combined with nimodipine in treating VaD to provide references for clinical treatments. The efficacy of donepezil hydrochloride combined with nimodipine on treating vascular dementia is systematically reviewed to provide evidence-based references for clinical applications. METHODS: Both Chinese and English databases were searched from the start till August, 2020 for any RCT regarding the combined use of the 2 drugs in treating vascular dementia. Two investigators would later evaluate and screened out research and data based on an improved Jaded scale. Software Rev Man 5.3.0 was employed to carry out meta-analysis on clinical effificacy, mini-mental state examination (MMSE) ratings, activity of daily living (ADL) ratings, and clinical dementia scale (CDR) ratings. RESULTS: Donepezil hydrochloride combined with nimodipine had demonstrated satisfactory efficacy on the treatment of vascular dementia. Improvements were namely spotted on MMSE scale, ADL scale, and CDR scale, with the utmost efficacy by 12 weeks after intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Donepezil hydrochloride combined with nimodipine had good efficacy in the treatment of patients with vascular dementia, mainly in terms of improving the Simple MMSE scores, the ability to use daily living scale (ADL) scores and the CDR, and the best results were obtained after 12 weeks of intervention. Such conclusion should be cautiously evaluated.

Intraarterial Nimodipine Versus Induced Hypertension for Delayed Cerebral Ischemia: A Modified Treatment Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Rescue treatment for delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after subarachnoid hemorrhage can include induced hypertension (iHTN) and, in refractory cases, endovascular approaches, of which selective, continuous intraarterial nimodipine (IAN) is one variant. The combination of iHTN and IAN can dramatically increase vasopressor demand. In case of unsustainable doses, iHTN is often prioritized over IAN. However, evidence in this regard is largely lacking. We investigated the effects of a classical (iHTN+IAN) and modified (IANonly) treatment protocol for refractory DCI in an observational study. METHODS: Rescue treatment for DCI was initiated with iHTN (target >180 mm Hg systolic) and escalated to IAN in refractory cases. Until July 2018, both iHTN and IAN were offered in cases refractory to iHTN alone. After protocol modification, iHTN target was preemptively lowered to >120 mm Hg when IAN was initiated (IANonly). Primary outcome was noradrenaline demand. Secondary outcomes included noradrenaline-associated complications, brain tissue oxygenation, DCI-related infarction and favorable 6-month outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale 4-5). RESULTS: N=29 and n=20 patients were treated according to the classical and modified protocol, respectively. Protocol modification resulted in a significant reduction of noradrenaline demand (iHTN+IAN 0.70±0.54 µg/kg per minute and IANonly 0.26±0.20 µg/kg per minute, P<0.0001) and minor complications (15.0% versus 48.3%, unadjusted odds ratio, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.05-0.79]; P<0.05) with comparable rates of major complications (20.0% versus 20.7%, odds ratio, 0.96 [0.23-3.95]; P=0.95). Incidence of DCI-related infarction (45.0% versus 41.1%, odds ratio, 1.16 [0.37-3.66]; P=0.80) and favorable clinical outcome (55.6% versus 40.0%, odds ratio, 1.88 [0.55-6.39]; P=0.32) were similar. Brain tissue oxygenation was significantly higher with IANonly (26.6±12.8, 39.6±15.4 mm Hg; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Assuming the potential of iHTN to be exhausted in case of refractory hypoperfusion, additional IAN may serve as a last-resort measure to bridge hypoperfusion in the DCI phase. With close monitoring, preemptive lowering of pressure target after induction of IAN may be a safe alternative to alleviate total noradrenaline load and potentially reduce complication rate.

Prophylactic Therapies for Morbidity and Mortality After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is associated with high mortality and morbidity. We aimed to determine the relative benefits of pharmacological prophylactic treatments in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage by performing a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. METHODS: We searched Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest, and Cochrane Central to February 2020. Pairs of reviewers independently identified eligible trials, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Eligible trials compared the prophylactic effects of any oral or intravenous medications or intracranial drug-eluting implants to one another or placebo or standard of care in adult hospitalized patients with confirmed aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. We used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to assess the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: We included 53 trials enrolling 10 415 patients. Nimodipine likely reduces all-cause mortality compared to placebo (odds ratio [OR],0.73 [95% CI, 0.53-1.00]; moderate certainty; absolute risk reduction (ARR), -3.35%). Nimodipine (OR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.07-1.99]; high certainty; absolute risk increase, 8.25%) and cilostazol (OR, 3.73 [95% CI, 1.14-12.18]; moderate certainty; absolute risk increase, 23.15%) were the most effective treatments in improving disability at the longest follow-up. Compared to placebo, clazosentan (10 mg/kg; OR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.22-0.68]; high certainty; ARR, -16.65%), nicardipine (OR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.24-0.94]; moderate certainty; ARR, -13.70%), fasudil (OR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.31-0.98]; moderate certainty; ARR, -11.54%), and magnesium (OR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.46-0.94]; high certainty; ARR, -8.37%) proved most effective in reducing the likelihood of delayed cerebral ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: Nimodipine and cilostazol are likely the most effective treatments in preventing morbidity and mortality in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Clazosentan, nicardipine, fasudil, and magnesium showed beneficial effects on delayed cerebral ischemia and vasospasm but they were not found to reduce mortality or disability. Future trials are warranted to elaborately investigate the prophylactic effects of medications that may improve mortality and long-term functional outcomes, such as cilostazol and clazosentan. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD42019122183.

Therapeutic Approaches for Cerebrovascular Dysfunction After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An Update and Future Perspectives.

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a severe subtype of stroke occurring at a relatively young age with a significant socioeconomic impact. Treatment of aSAH includes early aneurysm exclusion, intensive care management, and prevention of complications. Once the aneurysm rupture occurs, blood spreading within the subarachnoid space triggers several molecular pathways causing early brain injury and delayed cerebral ischemia. Pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying brain injury after aSAH are not entirely characterized, reflecting the difficulties in identifying effective therapeutic targets for patients with aSAH. Although the improvements of the last decades in perioperative management, early diagnosis, aneurysm exclusion techniques, and medical treatments have increased survival, vasospasm and delayed cerebral infarction are associated with high mortality and morbidity. Clinical practice can rely on a few specific therapeutic agents, such as nimodipine, a calcium-channel blocker proved to reduce severe neurologic deficits in these patients. Therefore, new pharmacologic approaches are needed to improve the outcome of this life-threatening condition, as well as a tailored rehabilitation plan to maintain the quality of life in aSAH survivors. Several clinical trials are investigating the efficacy and safety of emerging drugs, such as magnesium, clazosentan, cilostazol, interleukin 1 receptor antagonists, deferoxamine, erythropoietin, and nicardipine, and continuous lumbar drainage in the setting of aSAH. This narrative review focuses on the most promising therapeutic interventions after aSAH.

Hemodynamic response and clinical outcome following intravenous milrinone plus norepinephrine-based hyperdynamic hypertensive therapy in patients suffering secondary cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

PURPOSE: Intravenous and intra-arterial milrinone as a rescue measure for delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has been adopted by several groups, but so far, evidence for the clinical benefit is unclear and effect on brain perfusion is unknown. The aim of the actual analysis was to define cerebral hemodynamic effects and outcome of intravenous milrinone plus norepinephrine supplemented by intra-arterial nimodipine as a rescue strategy for DCI following aneurysmal SAH. METHODS: Of 176 patients with aneurysmal SAH treated at our neurosurgical department between April 2016 and March 2021, 98 suffered from DCI and were submitted to rescue therapy. For the current analysis, characteristics of these patients and clinical response to rescue therapy were correlated with hemodynamic parameters, as assessed by CT angiography (CTA) and perfusion CT. Time to peak (TTP) delay in the ischemic focus and the volume with a TTP delay of more than 4 s (T4 volume) were used as hemodynamic parameters. RESULTS: The median delay to neurological deterioration following SAH was 5 days. Perfusion CT at that time showed median T4 volumes of 40 cc and mean focal TTP delays of 2.5 ± 2.1 s in these patients. Following rescue therapy, median T4 volume decreased to 10 cc and mean focal TTP delay to 1.7 ± 1.9 s. Seventeen patients (17% of patients with DCI) underwent additional intra-arterial spasmolysis using nimodipine. Visible resolution of macroscopic vasospasm on CTA was observed in 43% patients with DCI and verified vasospasm on CTA, including those managed with additional intra-arterial spasmolysis. Initial WFNS grade, occurrence of secondary infarction, ischemic volumes and TTP delays at the time of decline, the time to clinical decline, and the necessity for additional intra-arterial spasmolysis were identified as the most important features determining neurological outcome at 6 months. CONCLUSION: The current analysis shows that cerebral perfusion in the setting of secondary cerebral ischemia following SAH is measurably improved by milrinone and norepinephrine-based hyperdynamic therapy. A long-term clinical benefit by the addition of milrinone appears likely. Separation of the direct effect of milrinone from the effect of induced hypertension is not possible based on the present dataset.

Lessons Learned from Phase II and Phase III Trials Investigating Therapeutic Agents for Cerebral Ischemia Associated with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

One of the challenges in bringing new therapeutic agents (since nimodipine) in for the treatment of cerebral ischemia associated with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is the incongruence in therapeutic benefit observed between phase II and subsequent phase III clinical trials. Therefore, identifying areas for improvement in the methodology and interpretation of results is necessary to increase the value of phase II trials. We performed a systematic review of phase II trials that continued into phase III trials, evaluating a therapeutic agent for the treatment of cerebral ischemia associated with aSAH. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for systematic reviews, and review was based on a peer-reviewed protocol (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews no. 222965). A total of nine phase III trials involving 7,088 patients were performed based on eight phase II trials involving 1558 patients. The following therapeutic agents were evaluated in the selected phase II and phase III trials: intravenous tirilazad, intravenous nicardipine, intravenous clazosentan, intravenous magnesium, oral statins, and intraventricular nimodipine. Shortcomings in several design elements of the phase II aSAH trials were identified that may explain the incongruence between phase II and phase III trial results. We suggest the consideration of the following strategies to improve phase II design: increased focus on the selection of surrogate markers of efficacy, selection of the optimal dose and timing of intervention, adjustment for exaggerated estimate of treatment effect in sample size calculations, use of prespecified go/no-go criteria using futility design, use of multicenter design, enrichment of the study population, use of concurrent control or placebo group, and use of innovative trial designs such as seamless phase II to III design. Modifying the design of phase II trials on the basis of lessons learned from previous phase II and phase III trial combinations is necessary to plan more effective phase III trials.

Influence of nimodipine combined with ulinastatin on neurological function and inflammatory reaction in patients with cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to discuss the influence of nimodipine+ulinastatin on the neurological function and inflammatory reaction in patients with cerebral vasospasm (CVS) after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: Overall, 90 patients with CVS after SAH who were admitted to our hospital were enrolled in this study and randomly divided into research and control groups (n = 45 for both groups). On the basis of conventional therapy, patients in the control group were injected with ulinastatin and those in the research group were injected with ulinastatin+nimodipine through an intravenous drip for 7 days with the others the same as those of the control group. RESULTS: Blood flow velocity in all cerebral arteries was lower in the research group than in the control group after treatment (P < 0.05). Calcitonin gene-related peptide and nitric oxide levels were higher in the research group than in the control group after treatment (P < 0.05). Endothelin levels were lower in the research group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The total effective rate was higher in the research group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Glasgow Coma Scale scores were higher in the research group than in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The drug combination of nimodipine and ulinastatin improved blood flow and neurological function in patients with CVS after SAH and enhanced the therapeutic efficacy; the underlying mechanism may be associated with the regulation of vascular endothelial dilatation function and the inhibition of relevant inflammatory factors' expression.

Effectiveness comparisons of drug therapies for postoperative aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients: network meta­analysis and systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of various drug interventions in improving the clinical outcome of postoperative patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and assist in determining the drugs of definite curative effect in improving clinical prognosis. METHODS: Eligible Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) were searched in databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (inception to Sep 2020). Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score, Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) score or modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was used as the main outcome measurements to evaluate the efficacy of various drugs in improving the clinical outcomes of postoperative patients with aSAH. The network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted based on a random-effects model, dichotomous variables were determined by using odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), and a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was generated to estimate the ranking probability of comparative effectiveness among different drug therapies. RESULTS: From the 493 of initial citation screening, forty-four RCTs (n = 10,626 participants) were eventually included in our analysis. Our NMA results showed that cilostazol (OR = 3.35,95%CI = 1.50,7.51) was the best intervention to improve the clinical outcome of patients (SUCRA = 87.29%, 95%CrI 0.07-0.46). Compared with the placebo group, only two drug interventions [nimodipine (OR = 1.61, 95%CI 1.01,2.57) and cilostazol (OR = 3.35, 95%CI 1.50, 7.51)] achieved significant statistical significance in improving the clinical outcome of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both nimodipine and cilostazol have exact curative effect to improve the outcome of postoperative patients with aSAH, and cilostazol may be the best drug to improve the outcome of patients after aSAH operation. Our study provides implications for future studies that, the combination of two or more drugs with relative safety and potential benefits (e.g., nimodipine and cilostazol) may improve the clinical outcome of patients more effectively.

COVID-19 Associated Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome Successfully Treated with Nimodipine and Aspirin.

There have been limited cases linking SARS-CoV-2 infection with the development of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS). We hereby report a rare case of RCVS in the setting of mild SARS-CoV-2 respiratory infection successfully treated with nimodipine and aspirin. SARS-CoV-2 attacks the ACE2-receptors, which are expressed in various body organs including the lungs, kidneys, and blood vessels. Vasoconstriction can result from down-regulation of the ACE2-receptors that can lead to sympathetic hypertonia of the cerebral blood vessel walls and/or over-activation of the renin-angiotensin axis.

Efficacy and Safety of the Association of Nimodipine and Choline Alphoscerate in the Treatment of Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Cerebral Small Vessel Disease. The CONIVaD Trial.

BACKGROUND: No approved treatment is available for patients with vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) due to cerebral small vessel disease (SVD). OBJECTIVE: The CONIVaD (Choline Alphoscerate and Nimodipine in Vascular Dementia) study aimed to investigate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of a combined treatment with choline alphoscerate and nimodipine in patients with SVD and mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment. METHODS: Within this pilot, single-center (university hospital), double-blinded, randomized clinical trial, patients were randomized to two arms: 1-year treatment with nimodipine 30 mg three times a day (TID) plus choline alphoscerate 600 mg twice a day (BID) (arm 1) or nimodipine 30 mg TID plus placebo BID (arm 2). Patients underwent an evaluation at baseline and after 12 months. Cognitive decline, defined as a ≥ 2-point loss on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, was the primary endpoint. Functional, quality of life, other cognitive measures, and safety were secondary endpoints. Treatment adherence was measured by the count of medicine bottles returned by patients. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were randomized (31 each arm). Fourteen patients (22%) dropped out for reasons including consent withdrawal (n = 9), adverse reactions (n = 4), and stroke (n = 1). Forty-eight patients (mean ± SD age 75.1 ± 6.8 years), well balanced between arms, completed the study. Regarding adherence, of the prescribed total drug dose, > 75% was taken by 96% of patients for choline alphoscerate, 87.5% for placebo, and 15% for nimodipine. No statistically significant differences were found between the treatment groups for the primary cognitive outcome, nor for the secondary outcomes. Eight patients had non-serious adverse reactions; five presented adverse events. CONCLUSION: Patients' adherence to treatment was low. With this limitation, the combined choline alphoscerate-nimodipine treatment showed no significant effect in our cohort of VCI patients with SVD. The safety profile was good overall. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial NCT03228498. Registered 25 July 2017.

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) caused by over-the-counter calcium supplement ingestion.

A 59-year-old woman was found unresponsive at home. Initial neurologic examination revealed aphasia and right-sided weakness. Laboratory results demonstrated a serum calcium level of 17.3 mg/dL (corrected serum calcium for albumin concentration was 16.8 mg/dL). Extensive workup for intrinsic aetiology of hypercalcemia was unrevealing. Further discussion with family members and investigation of the patient's home for over-the-counter medications and herbal supplements revealed chronic ingestion of calcium carbonate tablets. CT angiogram of the brain revealed multifocal intracranial vascular segmental narrowing, which resolved on a follow-up cerebral angiogram done 2 days later. These findings were consistent with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome.Appropriate blood pressure control with parenteral agents, calcium channel blockade with nimodipine and supportive care therapies resulted in significant improvement in neurologic status. By discharge, patient had near-complete resolution of neurologic symptoms.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the pathophysiology of vasospasms and delayed cerebral ischemia following subarachnoid hemorrhage: a critical review.

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a life-threatening condition associated with the development of early brain injury (EBI) and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Pharmacological treatment of vasospasm following aSAH currently mainly comprises nimodipine administration. In the past few years, many drugs that can potentially benefit cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage have become available. The objective of this review is to critically assess the effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) following aSAH. A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The search was aimed at studies addressing aSAH and NSAIDs during the 2010 to 2019 period, and it yielded 13 articles. Following the application of search criteria, they were divided into two groups, one containing 6 clinical articles and the other containing 7 experimental articles on animal models of aSAH. Inflammatory cerebral changes after aneurysm rupture contribute to the development of EBI, DCI and cerebral vasospasm. It appears that NSAIDs (especially coxibs) are even more effective in reducing vasospasm than nimodipine. Other beneficial effects of NSAIDs include reduction in mortality, improved functional outcome and increased hypoaggregability. However, despite these positive effects, there is only one randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial showing a tendency towards a better outcome with lower incidence of vasospasm or mortality in patients following aSAH.