[Low-concentration hydrogen peroxide solution for continuous bladder irrigation after transurethral resection of the prostate].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of low-concentration hydrogen peroxide solution (HPS) for continuous bladder irrigation after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data about 148 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated by TURP from January 2013 to January 2016. Seventy-six of the patients received postoperative continuous bladder irrigation with 0.15% HPS (group A) and the other 72 with normal saline (group B). We compared the two groups of patients in their postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) levels, duration of bladder irrigation, frequency of catheter blockage, time of catheterization, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients preoperatively in the prostate volume, International Prostate Symptoms Score, maximum urinary flow rate, postvoid residual urine, or levels of serum PSA and Hb (P > 0.05). At 48 hours after operation, a significantly less reduction was observed in the Hb level in group A than in group B (ï¼»3.38 ± 2.56ï¼½ vs ï¼»7.29 ± 6.58ï¼½ g/L, P < 0.01). The patients of group A, in comparison with those of group B, also showed remarkably shorter duration of postoperative bladder irrigation (ï¼»32.57 ± 5.99ï¼½ vs ï¼»46.10 ± 8.79ï¼½ h, P < 0.01), lower rate of catheter blockage (3.3% vs 11.8%, P < 0.01), shorter time of catheterization (ï¼»3.74 ± 0.79ï¼½ vs ï¼»4.79 ± 0.93ï¼½ d, P < 0.01), and fewer days of postoperative hospital stay (ï¼»4.22 ± 0.81ï¼½ vs ï¼»4.67 ± 0.88ï¼½ d, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Low-concentration HPS for continuous bladder irrigation after TURP can reduce blood loss, catheter blockage, bladder irrigation duration, catheterization time, and hospital stay, and therefore deserves a wide clinical application.

Low-concentration hydrogen peroxide solution for continuous bladder irrigation after transurethral resection of the prostate / 中华男科学杂志

<p><b>Objective</b>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of low-concentration hydrogen peroxide solution (HPS) for continuous bladder irrigation after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data about 148 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated by TURP from January 2013 to January 2016. Seventy-six of the patients received postoperative continuous bladder irrigation with 0.15% HPS (group A) and the other 72 with normal saline (group B). We compared the two groups of patients in their postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) levels, duration of bladder irrigation, frequency of catheter blockage, time of catheterization, and length of hospital stay.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients preoperatively in the prostate volume, International Prostate Symptoms Score, maximum urinary flow rate, postvoid residual urine, or levels of serum PSA and Hb (P > 0.05). At 48 hours after operation, a significantly less reduction was observed in the Hb level in group A than in group B (［3.38 ± 2.56］ vs ［7.29 ± 6.58］ g/L, P < 0.01). The patients of group A, in comparison with those of group B, also showed remarkably shorter duration of postoperative bladder irrigation (［32.57 ± 5.99］ vs ［46.10 ± 8.79］ h, P < 0.01), lower rate of catheter blockage (3.3% vs 11.8%, P < 0.01), shorter time of catheterization (［3.74 ± 0.79］ vs ［4.79 ± 0.93］ d, P < 0.01), and fewer days of postoperative hospital stay (［4.22 ± 0.81］ vs ［4.67 ± 0.88］ d, P < 0.01).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Low-concentration HPS for continuous bladder irrigation after TURP can reduce blood loss, catheter blockage, bladder irrigation duration, catheterization time, and hospital stay, and therefore deserves a wide clinical application.</p>

Evidence-based criteria for the choice and the clinical use of the most appropriate lock solutions for central venous catheters (excluding dialysis catheters): a GAVeCeLT consensus.

BACKGROUND: The most appropriate lock solution for central venous access devices is still to be defined. GAVeCeLT - the Italian group for venous access devices - has developed a consensus on the evidence-based criteria for the choice and the clinical use of the most appropriate lock solution for central venous catheters (excluding dialysis catheters). METHOD: After the constitution of a panel of experts, a systematic collection and review of the literature has been performed, focusing on clinical studies dealing with lock solutions used for prevention of occlusion (heparin, citrate, urokinase, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator [r-TPA], normal saline) or for prevention of infection (citrate, ethanol, taurolidine, ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid [EDTA], vancomycin, linezolid and other antibiotics), in both adults and in pediatric patients. Studies on central lines used for dialysis or pheresis, on peripheral venous lines and on arterial lines were excluded from this analysis. Studies on lock solutions used for treatment of obstruction or infection were not considered. The consensus has been carried out according to the Delphi method. RESULTS: The panel has concluded that: (a) there is no evidence supporting the heparin lock; (b) the prevention of occlusion is based on the proper flushing and locking technique with normal saline; (c) the most appropriate lock solution for infection prevention should include citrate and/or taurolidine, which have both anti-bacterial and anti-biofilm activity, with negligible undesired effects if compared to antibiotics; (d) the patient populations most likely to benefit from citrate/taurolidine lock are yet to be defined. CONCLUSIONS: The actual value of heparinization for non-dialysis catheters should be reconsidered. Also, the use of lock with substances with anti-bacterial and anti-biofilm activity (such as citrate or taurolidine) should be taken into consideration in selected populations of patients.

[Compatibility of intravenous medications needs attention. Catheter occlusion, treatment failure and embolisms can be prevented]. / Blandbarhet av intravenösa läkemedel behöver uppmärksammas - Kateterocklusion, terapisvikt och embolier kan förebyggas.

When dealing with more drugs than available lumens, intravenous medications need to be co-administered in the same catheter. This type of scenario may induce therapeutic risks, such as catheter occlusion, changes in drug effect or embolization of precipitated particles. Various sources are available to provide information on compatibilities of intravenous medications. When using these sources, the applicability of the information must be assessed, comparing concentrations, diluents used and other pharmaceutical aspects. For the last three years, a group of pharmacists at Sahlgrenska University Hospital has worked on a project collecting and validating compatibility data for intravenous medications. In the future, this data will be available to more hospitals in Sweden.

Only high levels of dabigatran attenuate catheter thrombosis in vitro and in rabbits.

In patients with mechanical heart valves, thromboembolic events were more frequent with dabigatran, an oral thrombin inhibitor, than with warfarin. This observation raises the possibility that dabigatran may be less effective than conventional anticoagulants in patients with other blood-contacting devices, such as catheters. To address this, we compared the capacity of dabigatran and/or heparin to inhibit catheter-induced thrombin generation in vitro and to attenuate catheter occlusion in rabbits. Using a catheter-induced thrombin generation assay, concentrations of dabigatran over 100 ng/ml prolonged the lag time and time to peak thrombin, and reduced the peak thrombin concentration and endogenous thrombin potential in a concentration-dependent fashion. Compared with saline in a rabbit model of catheter thrombosis, dabigatran prolonged the mean time to catheter occlusion by 2.9- and 1.9-fold when plasma levels were 173 and 140 ng/ml, respectively; values comparable to median peak levels in humans given dabigatran 150 mg twice daily. In contrast, low-dose dabigatran, which produced a level of 60 ng/ml; a value comparable to the trough level of dabigatran in humans, did not prolong the time to occlusion. Whereas a 70 U/kg bolus of heparin prolonged the mean time to occlusion by 3.4-fold, a 15 U/kg bolus had no effect. When low-dose dabigatran was given in combination with 15 U/kg heparin, the mean time to occlusion was prolonged by 2.7-fold. These findings suggest that only peak levels of dabigatran are sufficient to prevent catheter-induced clotting unless supplemented heparin is given.

Dietary fat modification in patients with chronic kidney disease: n-3 fatty acids and beyond.

Replacement of dietary saturated fat with unsaturated fat has been recommended for prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the general population. Less is known of the health risks in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD), of a diet with an unhealthy fat profile, in general characterized by insufficient polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and excess satu-rated fatty acids (SFA). The dietary intake of PUFA, both the n-3 and n-6 subfamilies, is increasingly gaining attention in CKD, owing to its broad cardioprotective effects. Conversely, dietary SFA may promote CVD in this vulnerable population. This review discusses the potential benefits of dietary fat modification in CKD patients, including plausible effects on renal function, albuminuria, lipoproteins, nutritional status, inflammation, thrombosis and clinical outcomes. Increasing evidence supports the concept that n-3 PUFA might have therapeutic potential in reducing proteinuria in CKD and reducing triglycerides and inflammation in dialysis patients. In addition, emerging evidence suggests that linoleic acid, a major n-6 PUFA derived from vegetable oils, may be beneficial for a number of CVD risk factors. Increased consumption of oily fish as part of plant-based diets with low content of SFA is likely to benefit patients who have CKD, or are at risk of developing CKD. Such recommendations are in line with the concept of a healthy "Mediterranean diet" and are in line with current dietary recommendations for CVD prevention in the community.