Surgical Risk Prediction for Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Radioactive Iodine-Treated Thyroid Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Background: To estimate the incident risk of surgical intervention for nasolacrimal duct obstruction after radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment and elucidate the high-risk group of patients with thyroid cancer (TC). Methods: This is a nationwide, population-based cohort study using data from the Korean National Health Claims database. Among the entire South Korean population aged between 20 and 80 years from 2007 to 2019, all patients with TC were included. Among all TC patients, a cohort was established by classifying it into the RAI and non-RAI groups according to whether RAI treatment was performed during the recruitment period. A log-rank analysis was used to evaluate the risk of nasolacrimal duct obstruction surgery in the RAI group compared with that in the non-RAI group. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to calculate the adjusted hazard ratio (HR). The analysis was performed stratified by the age group, sex, frequency of RAI treatment, and cumulative dose of 131I. Results: Among 55,371 TC patients, who received RAI treatment, 515 (0.93%) underwent nasolacrimal duct obstruction surgeries, and among 56,950 TC patients, who did not receive RAI treatment, 72 (0.13%) underwent the surgeries. The average timing of incident nasolacrimal duct obstruction surgery was 3.8 ± 2.1 years after the first exposure to RAI. The incidence rate of nasolacrimal duct obstruction surgery was 104.04/100,000 person-years in the RAI group. There was a significantly higher risk of nasolacrimal duct obstruction surgery (HR 7.50 [confidence interval, CI: 5.86-9.60], p < 0.001) in the RAI group than in the non-RAI group. The risks significantly increased in the high-dose group (HR 14.15 [CI: 10.88-18.39]) and those younger than 50 years (HR 15.54 [CI: 9.76-24.72]). Conclusion: We quantified the risk of RAI-induced nasolacrimal duct obstruction surgery through a long-term follow-up of 9 years, which may contribute to estimating the general health care burden related to RAI treatment for TC patients in a practical setting. Great attention should be paid to its risk in patients younger than 50 years, especially in those treated with high doses.

Antimetabolites as an adjunct to dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) is a condition that results in the overflow of tears (epiphora) or infection of the nasolacrimal sac (dacryocystitis). The etiology of acquired NLDO is multifactorial and is not fully understood. Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is the surgical correction of NLDO, which aims to establish a new drainage pathway between the lacrimal sac and the nose. The success of DCR is variable; the most common cause of failure is fibrosis and stenosis of the surgical ostium. Antimetabolites such as mitomycin-C (MMC) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) have been shown to be safe and effective in reducing fibrosis and improving clinical outcomes in other ophthalmic surgery settings (e.g. glaucoma and cornea surgery). Application of antimetabolites at the time of DCR has been studied, but the utility of these treatments remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: Primary objective: To determine if adjuvant treatment with antimetabolites improves functional success in the setting of DCR compared to DCR alone. Secondary objectives: To determine if anatomic success of DCR is increased with the use of antimetabolites, and if the surgical ostium is larger in participants treated with antimetabolites. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eye and Vision Trials Register) (2019, Issue 9), Ovid MEDLINE, Embase.com, PubMed, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches. We last searched the electronic databases on 6 September 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA: We only included randomized controlled trials. Eligible studies were those that compared the administration of antimetabolites of any dose and concentration versus placebo or another active treatment in participants with NLDO undergoing primary DCR and reoperation. We only included studies that had enrolled adults 18 years or older. We also included studies that used silicone intubation as part of the DCR procedure. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors independently screened the search results, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data from the included studies using an electronic data collection form. MAIN RESULTS: We included 31 studies in the review, of which 23 (1309 participants) provided data relating to our primary and secondary outcomes. Many of the 23 studies evaluated functional success, while others also assessed our secondary outcomes of anatomic success or ostium size, or both. Study characteristics Participant characteristics varied across studies, with the age of participants ranging from 30 to 70 years. Participants were predominantly women. These demographics correspond to those most frequently affected by nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Almost all of the studies utilized MMC as the antimetabolite, with only one using 5-FU. We assessed most trials as at unclear risk of bias for most domains. Conflicts of interest were not frequently reported, although the antimetabolites used are generic medications, and studies were not likely to be conducted for financial interest. Findings Twenty studies provided data on the primary outcome of functional success, of which 7 (356 participants) provided data at 6 months and 14 (909 participants) provided data beyond 6 months. At six months, the results showed no evidence of effect of antimetabolite on functional success (risk ratio (RR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98 to 1.29; low-certainty evidence). Beyond six months, the results favored the antimetabolite group (RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.25; moderate-certainty evidence). Fourteen studies reported data on the secondary outcome of anatomic success, of which 4 (306 participants) reported data at 6 months and 12 (831 participants) provided data beyond 6 months. Results at six months showed no evidence of effect of antimetabolite on anatomic success (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.11; low-certainty evidence). Beyond six months, participants in the antimetabolite group were more likely to achieve anatomic success than those receiving DCR alone (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.15; moderate-certainty evidence). At six months and beyond six months follow-up, two studies reported mean change in ostium size. We did not conduct meta-analysis for the various follow-up periods due to clinical, methodological, and statistical heterogeneity. However, point estimates from these studies at six months consistently favored participants in the antimetabolite group (low-certainty evidence). Beyond six months, while point estimates from one study favored participants in the antimetabolite group, estimates from another study showed no evidence of a difference between the two groups. The certainty of evidence at both time points was low. Adverse events Adverse events were rare. One study reported that one participant in the MMC group experienced delayed wound healing. Other studies reported no significant adverse events related to the application of antimetabolites. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is moderate-certainty evidence that application of antimetabolites at the time of DCR increases functional and anatomic success of DCR when patients are followed for more than six months after surgery, but no evidence of a difference at six months, low-certainty of evidence. There is low-certainty evidence that combining antimetabolite with DCR increases the size of the lacrimal ostium at six months. However, beyond six months, the evidence remain uncertain. Adverse effects of the application of antimetabolites were minimal.

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy following head and neck radiation therapy.

This article determines the efficacy of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (endoDCR) in patients who have undergone adjuvant external beam radiation therapy (XRT) following head and neck cancer resection. A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent endoDCR between 2006 and 2014 at a tertiary referral center. Cases were reviewed and selected for the following inclusion criteria: history of adjuvant sinonasal XRT following head and neck cancer resection, preoperative probing and irrigation demonstrating nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO), postoperative probing and irrigation following silicone tube extubation. Exclusion criteria included active dacryocystitis, postoperative follow-up of less than 4 months, presence of epiphora prior to XRT, lack of probing/irrigation at preoperative or postoperative visit, and lid malposition including ectropion, facial palsy, and/or poor tear pump. Six patients (7 eyes) met the selection criteria. EndoDCR was performed at a mean time of 30 months following last radiation treatment (range, 3-71 months). Mitomycin C was used in 4/7 cases. Silicone tube removal occurred between 3-8 months postoperatively. Five out of 6 patients had postoperative sinonasal debridement and nasal saline/corticosteroid irrigation. Five out of 6 patients (83%) had both resolution of epiphora and anatomic patency confirmed by probing and irrigation. Our experience suggests that endoDCR procedures can be effective in patients with NLDO following prior sinonasal XRT for head and neck neoplasms. Postoperative management with sinonasal debridement and combined saline/corticosteroid nasal irrigation may help to improve surgical success in patients with increased post-radiotherapy mucosal inflammation.

[Lacrimal drainage system obstruction associated to radioactive iodine therapy for thyroid carcinoma]. / Obstrução de vias lacrimais associada ao tratamento radioiodoterápico de carcinoma de tireoide.

PURPOSE: To report the finding of nasolacrimal drainage system obstruction associated with radio iodine therapy and to review clinical data and the surgical treatment outcome of this rare complication. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed ophthalmological data of patients with history of thyroid carcinoma that underwent radioactive iodine I-131 therapy and were referred to lacrimal surgery. RESULTS: 17 patients with thyroid cancer treated with thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine I-131 therapy presented symptomatic nasolacrimal duct obstruction after 13.2 months following cancer treatment. 11 patients presented bilateral epiphora, 8 had lacrimal sac mucocele. Age range was 30 to 80 years, 10 patients had less than or equal to 49 years. The mean cumulative dose of radioiodine was 571 mCi (range: 200-1200 mCi). Nasal obstruction symptoms and increased salivary glands were also present in 53% of patients. All subjects underwent dacryocystorhinostomy. Dilation of the lacrimal sac and increased intraoperative bleeding was also observed in 3 younger patients. Complete epiphora and dacryocystitis resolution after surgery occurred in 82.4%, and partial in 17.6% (3 patients that still presented unilateral relapse after correction of bilateral obstruction). Mean follow-up was 6 months (range: 2-24 months). CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative high dose of radioiodine, nasal and salivary gland dysfunction are associated with lacrimal drainage obstruction. We observed a great percentage of younger patients presenting dacryocystitis when compared to the idiopathic dacryostenosis. Radioactive iodine uptake by nasolacrimal duct mucosa with subsequent inflammation, edema and fibrosis seems to have a relationship to lacrimal duct obstruction. The knowledge of this complication is important for the study and proper management of these patients.

Obstrução de vias lacrimais associada ao tratamento radioiodoterápico de carcinoma de tireoide / Lacrimal drainage system obstruction associated to radioactive iodine therapy for thyroid carcinoma

OBJETIVO: Descrever uma série de pacientes portadores de obstrução do sistema lacrimal associado à radioiodoterapia para tratamento de carcinoma de tireoide, revisar os dados clínicos e a resposta ao tratamento cirúrgico desta rara complicação. MÉTODOS: Foi realizada uma análise retrospectiva dos achados oftalmológicos de pacientes com histórico de carcinoma de tireoide previamente submetidos à tireoidectomia e à RIT que foram encaminhados para cirurgia de vias lacrimais. RESULTADOS: Dezessete pacientes com carcinoma de tireoide tratados com tireoidectomia e RIT apresentaram obstrução do ducto nasolacrimal sintomática após período médio de 13,2 meses do tratamento do câncer. Onze pacientes tiveram epífora bilateral, 8 com mucocele de saco lacrimal. A idade dos pacientes variou entre 30 e 80 anos, sendo 10 com idade menor ou igual a 49 anos. A dose cumulativa média de radioiodo administrada foi de 571 mCi (variação entre 200-1200 mCi). Sintomas de obstrução nasal e aumento de glândulas salivares ocorreram em 53% dos pacientes. Todos os pacientes foram submetidos à dacriocistorrinostomia. Observou-se ainda que nos 3 pacientes mais jovens houve maior sangramento intraoperatótio e dilatação de saco lacrimal. A resolução completa da epífora e da dacriocistite ocorreu em 82,4%, e foi parcial em 17,6% (3 pacientes mantiveram queixa unilateral após a correção da obstrução bilateralmente). O seguimento médio foi de 6 meses (intervalo: 2-24 meses). CONCLUSÕES: Alta dose cumulativa de radioiodo, disfunção nasal e de glândulas salivares estão associadas à obstrução das vias lacrimais. Observa-se uma maior porcentagem de pacientes mais jovens apresentando quadro de dacriocistite quando comparado à dacrioestenose idiopática. A absorção de iodo radioativo pela mucosa do ducto nasolacrimal com subsequente inflamação, edema e fibrose parece ter relação direta com a obstrução do ducto nasolacrimal. O conhecimento desta complicação é importante para o estudo e abordagem correta desses pacientes.

PURPOSE: To report the finding of nasolacrimal drainage system obstruction associated with radio iodine therapy and to review clinical data and the surgical treatment outcome of this rare complication. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed ophthalmological data of patients with history of thyroid carcinoma that underwent radioactive iodine I-131 therapy and were referred to lacrimal surgery. RESULTS: 17 patients with thyroid cancer treated with thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine I-131 therapy presented symptomatic nasolacrimal duct obstruction after 13.2 months following cancer treatment. 11 patients presented bilateral epiphora, 8 had lacrimal sac mucocele. Age range was 30 to 80 years, 10 patients had less than or equal to 49 years. The mean cumulative dose of radioiodine was 571mCi (range: 200-1200 mCi). Nasal obstruction symptoms and increased salivary glands were also present in 53% of patients. All subjects underwent dacryocystorhinostomy. Dilation of the lacrimal sac and increased intraoperative bleeding was also observed in 3 younger patients. Complete epiphora and dacryocystitis resolution after surgery occurred in 82.4%, and partial in 17.6% (3 patients that still presented unilateral relapse after correction of bilateral obstruction). Mean follow-up was 6 months (range: 2-24 months). CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative high dose of radioidine, nasal and salivary gland dysfunction are associated with lacrimal drainage obstruction. We observed a great percentage of younger patients presenting dacryocystitis when compared to the idiopathic dacryostenosis. Radioactive iodine uptake by nasolacrimal duct mucosa with subsequent inflammation, edema and fibrosis seems to have a relationship to lacrimal duct obstruction. The knowledge of this complication is important for the study and proper management of these patients.

Outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy in patients with head and neck cancer treated with high-dose radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) in patients with head and neck cancer treated with high-dose radiation therapy. METHODS: The clinical records of 43 consecutive patients with head and neck cancer who underwent DCR after high-dose external beam radiation therapy plus ablative surgery and/or chemotherapy between December 2001 and April 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: There were 23 men and 20 women. The median age was 56 years (range, 2-92 years). Thirty-one patients were Caucasian, 6 Hispanic, 4 Asian, and 2 African American. Thirty patients (70%) presented with epiphora, 3 (7%) with dacryocystitis, and 10 (23%) with both epiphora and dacryocystitis. Symptoms were unilateral in 34 patients (79%) and bilateral in 9 patients (21%). The most common primary cancer diagnoses were squamous cell carcinoma (n = 14), sarcoma (n = 8), adenoid cystic carcinoma (n = 4), and basal cell carcinoma (n = 4). The most common primary tumor locations were the sinonasal cavity (n = 16), maxillary sinus (n = 9), palate (n = 3), and ethmoid sinus (n = 3). Thirty-seven patients (43 eyes) had DCR with silicone tube placement, and 6 patients (7 eyes) had DCR with Pyrex glass tube placement. Following DCR, 31 patients (72%) had resolution of their symptoms, and 12 patients (28%), 9 with silicone tubes and 3 with Pyrex glass tubes, had persistent or recurrent epiphora (DCR failure). The most common reason for failure was significant residual canalicular and nasal mucosal scar tissue. Eight of these 12 patients underwent additional surgery, most commonly with placement of a Pyrex glass tube. Seven (35%) of the 20 patients who underwent DCR less than 12 months after radiation therapy and 5 (21%) of the 23 patients who underwent DCR at least 12 months after radiation therapy had recurrent symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Dacryocystorhinostomy in patients with head and neck cancer previously treated with high-dose radiation therapy is generally successful, especially when delayed until at least 12 months after the completion of radiation therapy. A common reason for DCR failure after high-dose radiation therapy is severe canalicular and nasal mucosal scarring.

Congenital dacryocystocele: diagnosis and treatment.

Five children were diagnosed with congenital dacryocystocele; in all cases, the cystic lesion was unilateral; age ranged from 7 to 60 days (mean 29 days). The mean ultrasonography diameter of the cyst, at the time of the diagnosis, was 11.51 mm. Topical and systemic antibiotics and massage were prescribed. One patient had no recurrence of the dacryocystocele but 4 showed no improvement with medical treatment; they were submitted to successful probing in the first months of life under general anaesthesia. Nasal endoscopy revealed a nasolacrimal cyst in one patient. True dacryocystocele is relatively rare: ultrasound is a simple, non-invasive method that can reliably distinguish dacryocystocele from other pathological conditions. Several reports have described a variable natural course of these lesions but there are controversial opinions regarding their management. Initially, we treated this congenital anomaly with digital massage, and topical and systemic antibiotics. Probing under general anaesthesia was performed in the event of dacryocystitis or lack of resolution after a short trial period with digital massage. Particular attention was paid to nasal bilateral endoscopy to exclude a nasal obstruction caused by cystic swelling of the nasolacrimal duct. When performed, the probing procedure was successful in all patients.

Visualization of nasolacrimal drainage system after radioiodine therapy in patients with thyroid cancer.

The objective of this study was to report three cases with an accumulation of (131)I in the nasolacrimal duct after radioiodine therapy for papillary thyroid cancer. A whole-body scan was taken 3 days after the administration of 3.7 GBq of (131)I. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT images were added when the location of a focal tracer uptake was undetermined on whole-body scans. In case 1, a 62-year-old woman complained of epiphora of the left eye after nine radioiodine therapies with a cumulative dose of 31.08 GBq. The left nasolacrimal duct was visualized at her tenth treatment with (131)I. In case 2, a series of three radioiodine therapies had been given to a 73-year-old woman with a cumulative dose of 11.1 GBq. The accumulation of (131)I was noted in the left nasolacrimal duct at her fourth treatment. She complained of epiphora of the left eye. In case 3, bilateral nasolacrimal ducts were visualized at the second radioiodine therapy in a 75-year-old woman. The patient had received 3.7 GBq of (131)I at the first therapy. She did not complain of epiphora. It is possible that radiation from (131)I that is secreted in tears and/or actively accumulated in the nasolacrimal duct may induce nasolacrimal duct obstruction. (131)I in tears would be responsible for the visualization of nasolacrimal duct in the first two cases. (131)I actively accumulated in the nasolacrimal duct might have been visualized in the third case. In summary, (131)I is excreted in tears and is actively accumulated in the nasolacrimal duct. Obstruction of the lacrimal drainage system could occur after high-dose radioiodine therapy.

Expression of sodium iodide symporter in the lacrimal drainage system: implication for the mechanism underlying nasolacrimal duct obstruction in I(131)-treated patients.

PURPOSE: Nasolacrimal outflow obstruction has been associated with high-dose (>150 mCi) radioactive iodine (I(131)) treatment. Commonly used for thyroid cancer treatment, I(131) is effectively transported in the targeted tissue by the Na(+)/I symporter (NIS). We hypothesized that NIS is expressed in the lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct and that active accumulation of I(131) is responsible for the clinical observations seen in these patients. METHODS: Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical analyses were used to evaluate NIS expression in both archived and fresh human tissues RESULTS: Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis showed that NIS mRNA is present in the lacrimal sac. Immunohistochemical analysis indicated that NIS protein is expressed in the stratified columnar epithelial cells of the lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct. NIS protein was undetectable in the lacrimal gland, Wolfring and Krause glands, conjunctiva, canaliculus, and nasal mucosa. NIS-expressing columnar epithelial cells were absent and fibrosis was evident in the lacrimal sacs from I(131)-treated patients undergoing dacryocystorhinostomy. CONCLUSIONS: NIS is present in the lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct of humans, correlating to the anatomic areas of clinical obstruction that develop in patients treated with greater than 150 mCi of I(131). This suggests that NIS may be the vector of radiation-induced injury to the lacrimal system. To our knowledge, this is the first report of any ion transporter in the nasolacrimal outflow system and raises new questions as to the role the lacrimal sac plays in the modification of tears and in lacrimal outflow pathology.

Nasolacrimal drainage obstruction after radioiodine therapy: case report and a review of the literature.

The authors report a 54-year-old woman with papillary thyroid carcinoma (Lindsay type, pT2 N0 M1) with pulmonary metastases. After a total thyroidectomy, a series of 3 radioiodine therapies were performed with a cumulative dose of 700 mCi I-131. After termination of the therapy, the patient was initially without complaints, but approximately 6 months later, epiphora was noted, first only of the right eye and eventually of both eyes. A whole-body I-131 scan performed 1 year after final radioiodine therapy showed atypical tracer accumulation in both medial orbital regions. This finding was new compared with the scan that was done 1 year before. Dacryocystography revealed bilateral occlusion of the lacrimal drainage system. A review of the literature shows that epiphora and lacrimal duct alterations are rarely investigated and potentially underestimated side effects after high-dose radioiodine therapy.

[Low-intensity helium-neon laser in the treatment of patients after endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy]. / Primenenie nizkointensivnogo gelii-neonovogo lazera v lechenii bol'nykh posle éndonazal'noi dakriotsistorinostomii.

Described in the paper is an efficiency study of using, postoperatively, the low-intensity helium-neon laser (LIHNL) in patients with obstruction of the lacrimal tracts. Eighty patients were examined after endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. They were shared between 2 groups with respect to a postoperative course: group 1--experimental, 40 patients, and group 2--control, 40 patients. The experimental patients received, apart from the traditional postoperative therapy, a course of LIHNL therapy. The controls received only the traditional postoperative treatment. The efficiency of postoperative treatment was evaluated by clinical, instrumental and laboratory examination methods. The study denoted that the use of LIHNL in the early postoperative period after endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy had a pronounced anti-inflammatory effect, speeded up the wound healing, prevented the growth of granulation tissues and the merging of the shaped lacrimal-sac fistula with the nasal cavity. LIHNL contributed to a complete recovery of the functional activity of the nasal mucous tunic. Thus, the LIHNL therapy essentially facilitates the postoperative management of patients, cuts the rehabilitation period and enhances the treatment results.

Lacrimal punctal occlusion for the treatment of superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis is caused by insufficient tear supply to the superior keratoconjunctiva. METHODS: We used cautery and sutures to permanently occlude the lacrimal puncta of 11 patients (22 eyes) with superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis for whom topical treatment was ineffective. RESULTS: All 11 patients (22 eyes) responded favorably to lacrimal punctal occlusion. After lacrimal punctal occlusion, rose bengal and fluorescein staining (both on a scale of 0 [no staining] to 9 [complete staining]) were reduced (mean +/- SD, 2.7 +/- 1.6 to 1.1 +/- 1.8 and 1.4 +/- 1.2 to 0.4 +/- 0.8, respectively). Impression cytology disclosed improvement of squamous metaplasia in the superior conjunctiva as well as increased goblet cells in nine of 13 eyes (69%) examined. Subjective symptoms improved in all 22 eyes (100%). CONCLUSIONS: Improvement of local tear deficiency to the superior limbic portion by punctal occlusion was an effective treatment in this small series. Superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis might be caused by the insufficient local tear supply.

Evaluation of lacrimal obstruction secondary to facial fractures using computed tomography or computed tomographic dacryocystography.

Facial fractures that result in lacrimal drainage obstruction may add complexities to lacrimal surgery. The role of preoperative assessment of lacrimal obstruction after facial fractures using computed tomography (CT) or CT dacryocystography was assessed in this study. Consecutive patients (n = 13) with symptomatic lacrimal obstruction after facial fractures underwent radiologic evaluation prior to lacrimal surgery. The first three patients underwent CT alone. The subsequent 10 patients underwent CT dacryocystography, in which radio-opaque dye was instilled into the lacrimal sac prior to CT. Radiographic findings pertinent to surgical management were present in 11 of the 13 patients and included alterations in bony anatomy, plates or wires adjacent to the lacrimal sac, nasal septal deviation, sinusitis, anterior ethmoid air cells, and anteriorly located middle turbinates. CT or CT dacryocystography prior to lacrimal surgery in patients with previous facial fractures may facilitate preoperative planning and intraoperative execution. It is recommended that the cost of these studies be minimized by adherence to streamlined protocols widely used in sinus CT.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome with associated nasolacrimal duct obstruction treated with dacryocystorhinostomy and Crawford silicone tube insertion.

Although Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) has long been recognized as a cause of punctal and canalicular obstruction, nasolacrimal duct obstruction secondary to SJS is rare and has not been reported in the ophthalmologic literature. Keratoconjunctivitis sicca, entropion, and trichiasis are well-known complications of SJS that may require measures to supplement or preserve tears. Lacrimal drainage system obstruction may occasionally occur in the face of relatively normal tearing, resulting in clinically significant epiphora. We report two cases of SJS, one associated with epidemic keratoconjunctivitis, that led to nasolacrimal duct obstruction and canalicular obstruction or stenosis. Epiphora and, in one case, dacryocystitis, necessitated dacryocystorhinostomy and Crawford tube insertion.