Complete denture services: clinical technique, lab costs, manpower, and reimbursement. One-year review.

Complete denture services at comprehensive care public health clinics are not common in part because of clinician concerns regarding outcomes. Educational debt forgiveness has attracted recent dental graduates to public health dentistry; however, not all recent graduates receive denture education experiences necessary to attain proficiency. While fundamental patient assessment and denture construction are taught, psychological assessment and communication with denture patients requires experience. A thorough understanding of occlusion, phonetics, esthetics and laboratory steps is also necessary. Expecting recent dental graduates to become proficient providing complete dentures at minimal reimbursement levels, with no mentorship or on-site laboratory support, is unrealistic. Public health dental clinics operate at full capacity performing emergency, preventive and restorative procedures. Complete dentures come with a laboratory fee approximately one-half the total reimbursement, meaning a remake drops clinic revenue to zero while doubling expenses. It is understandable that full schedules, marginal reimbursement, unpredictability and the risk of an occasional failure block clinician interest in providing denture services. This one-year report of services describes a three-appointment complete denture technique offering improved patient and laboratory communication, reduced chair time and controlled cost, resulting in high-quality complete dentures.

Attributes of an ideal oral health care system.

OBJECTIVES: The sense of urgency concerning the inadequacies of the current U.S. oral health care system in better preventing oral diseases, eliminating oral health disparities, and ensuring access to basic oral health services has increased in recent years. This paper sought to articulate the attributes that an ideal oral health care system would possess, which would be consistent with the principles of the leading authorities on the public's health. METHODS: The authors reviewed policy statements and position papers of the World Health Organization, The Institute of Medicine, The American Public Health Association, Healthy People 2010 Objectives for the Nation, and the American Association of Public Health Dentistry. RESULTS: Consistent with leading public health authorities, an ideal oral health care system would be have the following attributes: integration with the rest of the health care system; emphasis on health promotion and disease prevention; monitoring of population oral health status and needs; evidence-based; effective; cost-effective; sustainable; equitable; universal; comprehensive; ethical; includes continuous quality assessment and assurance; culturally competent; and empowers communities and individuals to create conditions conducive to health. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are some attributes of an ideal oral health care system on which the United States has made initial strides, it falls far short in many areas. The development of an oral health care delivery system that meets the characteristics described above is possible but would require tremendous commitment and political will on the part of the American public and its elected officials to bring it to fruition.

The case for integrating oral health into primary health care.

Severe disparities in oral health and inequities in access to oral health care exist globally. In New Zealand, the cost of oral health services is high. Physician services and medicines are heavily subsidised by the government -- however, in contrast, private financing, either as out-of-pocket payments or as private insurance, dominates dental care. Consequently, the use of services is often prompted by symptoms, and services are mostly oriented towards relief of pain. The high cost of dental care with insufficient emphasis on primary prevention of oral diseases, poses a considerable challenge for providing equitable access to health care as laid down by the Alma-Ata Declaration on Primary Health Care (PHC). While improving oral health is one of the health objectives of the New Zealand Health Strategy, providing accessible and affordable oral health services does not feature prominently in the current Primary Health Care Strategy. This paper discusses current knowledge regarding oral health in relation to general health and health care strategies and frameworks, in order to highlight that oral health care is an important component of primary health care. The authors also propose that oral health care should be integrated into primary health care in New Zealand. This could be achieved by placing oral health within the broader framework of PHC as encapsulated by the Alma-Ata Declaration and the New Zealand Primary Health Care Strategy.

More attention to public health in the European Union - implications for dentistry?

At present the European Union is developing its competence on health and new important issues will be taken on board in European health policy. Increasing mobility of people and integration of the applicant countries puts pressure on the current health care provision systems. A mandate for an open co-ordination process in public health is expected to be given by the European Council. The process will start by exchange of information and best practice models. The next step will be the presentation of common targets between member countries, followed by national action programmes and indicators. It is likely that a lot of emphasis will be put on access to health services, comparisons of costs of health care and benchmarking the costs of items of care. In the long run this will mean convergence of the health care systems. If oral health is to be considered an integral part of general health dental professionals need to be aware of and be able to influence the actions to be taken.

Restorative treatment and use of local anesthesia in free and subsidized public dental services in Helsinki, Finland.

Our aim was to evaluate restorative treatment and the use of local anesthetics in free and subsidized public dental care in Helsinki, Finland. Public dental clinics are open to all patients under the age of 36, and to some specific groups above that age. Patients up to age 19 receive all treatment free of charge and others at highly subsidized rates. Data were collected in May 2001 during a maximum 2-week period covering all public dental clinics in Helsinki. A one-page questionnaire was sent to all dentists (n = 140) in clinical fields. The data requested included the patient's gender and year of birth, and details on restorations: which tooth and which surfaces were filled, the reason for placement or replacement, the material used, and use of local anesthetic. The response rate was 96%. Of all restorations (n = 3057) placed, 14% were in primary teeth and in permanent teeth: 17% in premolars, 17% in incisors, and 52% in molars; the restorative material most often used was composite resin (69%). Glass-ionomer/compomers dominated in the primary teeth. Local anesthetic was used least (35%) in patients under 13 years of age. Replacements of restorations accounted for 10% of all in the free service (under 20 years of age) and 46% in subsidized dental care (20 and older). The major reasons for replacement were secondary caries (41%) and fractured or lost restoration (40%).

Disease activity and need for dental care in a capitation plan based on risk assessment.

This article describes a capitation model of care which would stimulate both dentists and patients to apply existing preventive knowledge.

Residency training in dental public health: assessment of status, needs, and issues.

The opportunities for public health training have declined over the years while the need for public health skills is likely to increase. This paper reports the results of a project, sponsored by the Health Resources and Services Administration, which answers the question of "how best to invest in the dental public health education system so as to fulfill the profession's responsibilities to protect and improve the oral health of individuals and society." An information base on dental public health education, practice, and specialization was developed from an extensive review of the literature and a survey of dentists concerning employment and practice requirements for public health dentists. An advisory group considered this information, met to discuss the issues involved in dental public health training, and provided advice to the project staff. Based on the information gathered as part of the project, recommendations were made to: (1) develop a grant program to support advanced education in dental public health; (2) increase the competencies of dentists who are working in public health positions and not eligible for board certification via off-site residencies; (3) develop model programs in areas of great need, such as general public health, management, policy, prevention, environmental health and research, that in conjunction with a basic public health core, could satisfy the eligibility requirements of the American Board of Dental Public Health; (4) develop student loan forgiveness programs for dentists and dental hygienists working in public health; and (5) develop additional credential recognition programs for dental public health workers.

Future treatment needs in children, adults and the elderly.

Future treatment needs for dental services are discussed in the perspective of the objective which the services are meant to fulfill. These are, broadly speaking, equal distribution of services and economic efficiency. Within the Nordic countries, the emphasis has been on equity, perhaps less on efficiency. Equity of utilization is best understood as being a situation where patients with equal needs for oral health care receive equal treatment, in terms of both the volume and the quality of the services. The justification for arguing that equality of utilization is the appropriate measure is mainly based on the externality argument: health-care consumption by one person may be the source of utility to another person. According to that view there are two beneficiaries of dental care: the patient who is sick, and the rest of society who care for the sick patient and who derive utility from seeing the patient become healthy. The public dental services for children in the Nordic countries are organized according to the principle of equity of utilization. Equity of access is best understood as being a situation where people with equal needs have equal opportunity to use dental services. It is a supply-side phenomenon; equal access is achieved when patients with the same needs face the same costs of dental-care consumption in terms of both time and money. The oral health situation among children, adults and the elderly is exemplified by national service data and recent studies.

Use of dental hygienists and returns to scale in child dental care in Norway.

The purpose of this study was to investigate, in the provision of dental care for children, technically and economically efficient combinations of dentists and dental hygienists and to study returns to scale by analyzing production functions. Data from 137 dental health clinics were analyzed. Output was registered as the number of 3-18-yr-old children to whom the clinic delivered complete dental care. Resource input was registered as hours spent by dentists, dental hygienists and dental assistants to deliver care to the children. The average clinic that employed dental hygienists used one hygienist hour per three dentist hours for child dental care. It would save dentist time, but not costs, to extent the use of hygienists. Increased use of dental hygienists might be economically efficient if the work distribution between the personnel groups were changed, for example, by delegating more examinations and preventive care to hygienists. There were technical opportunities for further substitution of dental hygienists for dentists both by introducing dental hygienists in the clinics that only used dentists in child dental care and by extending use of hygienists in clinics that already employed hygienists. This study found no productivity gain from centralizing treatment of children in large dental clinics.