Implementing a Safety Bundle to Improve Screening and Care for Perinatal Mood and Anxiety Disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To improve screening and care of individuals with perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMAD) through the implementation of a perinatal mental health safety bundle. DESIGN: Rapid-cycle quality improvement model using four plan-do-study-act cycles over the course of 90 days. Individuals between 28 and 32 weeks gestation and at their 6-week postpartum follow-up visit were screened and offered stage-based care for PMAD. SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM: At baseline, only 15% of clients of a suburban, private-practice women's health clinic were receiving PMAD screening with a validated tool, and the site lacked standardized PMAD care practices among health care providers. PARTICIPANTS: Health care providers (n = 2), staff (n = 4), and eligible patients (n = 78) at a private-practice women's health clinic. INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS: A screening, brief intervention, referral, and treatment/follow-up (SBIRT) model was used to screen eligible patients, provide treatment options, and appropriately refer for follow-up to mental health services. Team engagement occurred via weekly meetings. Measurements included pre-post maternal and team engagement survey results, biweekly chart review, and run chart analysis. RESULTS: Effective PMAD screening and right care were achieved for 85% of eligible individuals; this included receiving screening, referral to treatment, a scheduled mental health appointment, and clinic follow-up to ensure mental health care uptake. CONCLUSION: Use of the SBIRT model to implement a safety bundle may contribute to improved mental health outcomes for individuals receiving perinatal care in a private-practice outpatient health care setting. Education and engagement among clinicians, staff, and patients are key to successful implementation of a safety bundle.

Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes After the Introduction of the Medicare Sepsis Performance Measure (SEP-1).

BACKGROUND: Medicare requires that hospitals report on their adherence to the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of SEP-1 on treatment patterns and patient outcomes. DESIGN: Longitudinal study of hospitals using repeated cross-sectional cohorts of patients. SETTING: 11 hospitals within an integrated health system. PATIENTS: 54 225 encounters between January 2013 and December 2017 for adults with sepsis who were hospitalized through the emergency department. INTERVENTION: Onset of the SEP-1 reporting requirement in October 2015. MEASUREMENTS: Changes in SEP-1-targeted processes, including antibiotic administration, lactate measurement, and fluid administration at 3 hours from sepsis onset; repeated lactate and vasopressor administration for hypotension within 6 hours of sepsis onset; and sepsis outcomes, including risk-adjusted intensive care unit (ICU) admission, in-hospital mortality, and home discharge among survivors. RESULTS: Two years after its implementation, SEP-1 was associated with variable changes in process measures, with the greatest effect being an increase in lactate measurement within 3 hours of sepsis onset (absolute increase, 23.7 percentage points [95% CI, 20.7 to 26.7 percentage points]; P < 0.001). There were small increases in antibiotic administration (absolute increase, 4.7 percentage points [CI, 1.9 to 7.6 percentage points]; P = 0.001) and fluid administration of 30 mL/kg of body weight within 3 hours of sepsis onset (absolute increase, 3.4 percentage points [CI, 1.5 to 5.2 percentage points]; P < 0.001). There was no change in vasopressor administration. There was a small increase in ICU admissions (absolute increase, 2.0 percentage points [CI, 0 to 4.0 percentage points]; P = 0.055) and no changes in mortality (absolute change, 0.1 percentage points [CI, -0.9 to 1.1 percentage points]; P = 0.87) or discharge to home. LIMITATION: Data are from a single health system. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the SEP-1 mandatory reporting program was associated with variable changes in process measures, without improvements in clinical outcomes. Revising the measure may optimize its future effect. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Spillover effects of mandatory hip and knee replacement surgery bundles in medicare.

BACKGROUND: Medicare used the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) Model to mandate that hospitals in certain health care markets accept bundled payments for lower extremity joint replacement surgery. CJR has reduced spending with stable quality as intended among Medicare fee-for-service patients, but benefits could "spill over" to individuals insured through private health plans. Definitive evidence of spillovers remains lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between CJR participation and changes in outcomes among privately insured individuals. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: We used 2013-2017 Health Care Cost Institute claims for 418,016 privately insured individuals undergoing joint replacement in 75 CJR and 121 Non-CJR markets. Multivariable generalized linear models with hospital and market random effects and time fixed effects were used to analyze the association between CJR participation and changes in outcomes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Total episode spending, discharge to institutional post-acute care, and quality (e.g., surgical complications, readmissions). RESULTS: Patients in CJR and Non-CJR markets did not differ in total episode spending (difference of -$157, 95% CI -$1043 to $728, p = 0.73) or discharge to institutional post-acute care (difference of -1.1%, 95% CI -3.2%-1.0%, p = 0.31). Similarly, patients in the two groups did not differ in quality or other utilization outcomes. Findings were generally similar in stratified and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: There was a lack of evidence of cost or utilization spillovers from CJR to privately insured individuals. There may be limits in the ability of certain value-based payment reforms to drive broad changes in care delivery and patient outcomes.

Implementation of a Perinatal Depression Care Bundle in a Nurse-Managed Midwifery Practice.

OBJECTIVE: To implement a perinatal depression care bundle at a midwifery practice to help certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) educate women about perinatal depression and direct those affected to mental health services. DESIGN: Quality improvement project to implement a perinatal depression care bundle for care of pregnant women between 24 and 29 weeks gestation. SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM: CNMs practicing in a nurse-managed midwifery practice systematically screen all women for perinatal depression during pregnancy and the postpartum period but do not have a consistent method of providing anticipatory guidance about perinatal depression. PARTICIPANTS: All CNMs in the midwifery practice providing prenatal care (n = 16) participated in implementation. INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS: The perinatal depression care bundle included three elements: (a) an educational handout; (b) a brief, provider-initiated discussion about perinatal depression; and (c) lists of local and online mental health resources. Four weeks after the care bundle was implemented, we conducted a retrospective chart review to assess CNMs' adherence to the new bundle. RESULTS: Over 4 weeks, 51 prenatal visits met eligibility criteria for participation. CNMs implemented the perinatal depression care bundle for 22 (43.1%) eligible visits. CNM feedback indicated that the care bundle was brief, easy to incorporate into routine care, and well received by women. CONCLUSION: This project incorporated the use of a perinatal depression care bundle for women seen during routine prenatal care. Using a systematic approach to deliver perinatal depression education and resources reduces process variability and may destigmatize the illness, allowing women to feel empowered to seek help before depression symptoms become severe.

Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary patient care bundle for reducing surgical-site infections.

BACKGROUND: Surgical-site infection (SSI) is associated with significant healthcare costs. To reduce the high rate of SSI among patients undergoing colorectal surgery at a cancer centre, a comprehensive care bundle was implemented and its efficacy tested. METHODS: A pragmatic study involving three phases (baseline, implementation and sustainability) was conducted on patients treated consecutively between 2013 and 2016. The intervention included 13 components related to: bowel preparation; oral and intravenous antibiotic selection and administration; skin preparation, disinfection and hygiene; maintenance of normothermia during surgery; and use of clean instruments for closure. SSI risk was evaluated by means of a preoperative calculator, and effectiveness was assessed using interrupted time-series regression. RESULTS: In a population with a mean BMI of 30 kg/m2 , diabetes mellitus in 17·5 per cent, and smoking history in 49·3 per cent, SSI rates declined from 11·0 to 4·1 per cent following implementation of the intervention bundle (P = 0·001). The greatest reductions in SSI rates occurred in patients at intermediate or high risk of SSI: from 10·3 to 4·7 per cent (P = 0·006) and from 19 to 2 per cent (P < 0·001) respectively. Wound care modifications were very different in the implementation phase (43·2 versus 24·9 per cent baseline), including use of an overlying surface vacuum dressing (17·2 from 1·4 per cent baseline) or leaving wounds partially open (13·2 from 6·7 per cent baseline). As a result, the biggest difference was in wound-related rather than organ-space SSI. The median length of hospital stay decreased from 7 (i.q.r. 5-10) to 6 (5-9) days (P = 0·002). The greatest reduction in hospital stay was seen in patients at high risk of SSI: from 8 to 6 days (P < 0·001). SSI rates remained low (4·5 per cent) in the sustainability phase. CONCLUSION: Meaningful reductions in SSI can be achieved by implementing a multidisciplinary care bundle at a hospital-wide level.

[Essential measures for prehospital treatment of severely injured patients: The trauma care bundle]. / Wesentliche Maßnahmen zur prähospitalen Versorgung schwerverletzter Patienten: Das Trauma Care Bundle.

BACKGROUND: In order to ensure adequate treatment and to avoid complications, care bundles are increasingly being implemented. These are comprehensive and evidence-based procedures for the treatment of individual diseases or injuries which should be carried out for every patient. The aim of this study was to define a care bundle for the prehospital treatment of severely injured patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The scientific contents of the bundle were gathered from the interdisciplinary evidence-based S3 guidelines for the treatment of severely injured patients by the German Trauma Society. The ABCDE scheme suggested by the prehospital trauma life support (PHTLS®) and the advanced trauma life support (ATLS®) functioned as a matrix for the individual elements in the bundles. The identified elements were finalized by a consensus process. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A bundle of six elements was suggested and a comprehensive summary of key items during prehospital management of severely injured patients was identified. In a next step the effectiveness of the care bundle should be evaluated in a clinical trial.