Effects of Surgical Timing of Facial Nerve Decompression for Patients With Severe Bell's Palsy.

Context: Bell's palsy is a form of idiopathic, facial nerve palsy. Initial treatment includes the use of oral corticosteroids and/or antiviral agents, but facial paralysis may persist. Some surgeons suggest that surgical decompression of the facial nerve can be a beneficial, but the optimal surgical approach, extent of nerve decompression, and timing of surgery remain unclear. Objective: This study intended to evaluate the efficacy of delayed, facial nerve decompression for severe Bell's palsy (BP) and to explore the relationship of opportunity timing for operations, with postoperative recovery for facial nerve function. Design: The research team performed a retrospective study. Setting: The study took place at Beijing Tiantan Hospital of Capital Medical University in Beijing, China. Participants: Participants were 45 patients who had been diagnosed with BP between 2015 and 2021 and who had undergone facial nerve decompression using the transmastoid approach, between 30 and 180 days after the onset of BP. According to the operation's timing, the research team divided the participants into three groups, consisting of participants who underwent surgery: (1) at 30-60-days after BP onset-19 participants, (2) at 61-90 days after BP onset-18 participants, and (3) at more than 90 days after BP onset-8 participants. Outcome Measures: The research team: (1) analyzed participants' demographic and preoperative and postoperative clinical characteristics, (2) compared the surgical outcomes with participants' House-Brackmann (HB) scales, and (3) analyzed the factors affecting the recovery of facial nerve function using logistic regression. Results: Decompression surgery was effective for 29 participants (64.4%), with similar rates for participants who underwent surgery after 30-60 days (73.7%) and 61-90 days (77.8%), but the surgery' success was significantly higher for those groups than for participants who underwent surgery after >90 days (12.5%), with P = .008 and P = .003, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that disease duration was the only factor significantly associated with the effectiveness of surgery (odds ratio = 120.337; 95% confidence interval 2.997-4832.267, P = .011). Conclusions: For patients with severe Bell's palsy with ineffective conservative treatment, surgery performed 30 to 90 days after the onset of paralysis can have therapeutic benefits, whereas surgery performed after 3 months is relatively ineffective.

Endoscopic transcanal facial nerve decompression in Bell's palsy: A pilot study.

PURPOSE: To explore the surgical effects of endoscopic facial nerve decompression in Bell's palsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 15 patients with Bell's palsy. All had grade VI (House-Brackmann grading system) complete unilateral facial paralysis before surgery and a >95% reduction in amplitude on electroneurography testing compared to the unaffected side. Their MRI results indicated perineural edema in the geniculate ganglion area. Endoscopic decompression surgery was performed soon after they presented at our hospital. The time between onset of facial paralysis and surgery ranged from 25 to 93 days. All patients had no relevant surgical history or ear diseases. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, 13 of the 15 (87%) patients had recovered to normal or near-normal facial function (House-Brackmann grade I-II), and all patients had reached House-Brackmann grade III or lower facial function. No obvious air-bone gap or sensorineural hearing loss occurred after surgery, and there were no severe complications or synkinesis. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic transcanal facial nerve decompression provides a less traumatic and improved exposure of the geniculate ganglion, and may also help prevent permanent severe facial sequela. Results of intraoperative facial nerve stimulation may be related to the length of time required for recovery. The optimal time of surgery after onset of paralysis needs to be investigated further, to identify a post-drug surgical therapy which may be more acceptable for patients. Patients' response to conservative treatments should be assessed as soon as possible so as not to delay surgery.

Efficacy of high and low level laser therapy in the treatment of Bell's palsy: a randomized double blind placebo-controlled trial.

The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the effects of high intensity laser therapy (HILT) and low level laser therapy (LLLT) on the treatment of patients with Bell's palsy. Forty-eight patients participated in and completed this study. The mean age was 43 ± 9.8 years. They were randomly assigned into three groups: HILT group, LLLT group, and exercise group. All patients were treated with facial massage and exercises, but the HILT and LLLT groups received the respective laser therapy. The grade of facial recovery was assessed by the facial disability scale (FDI) and the House-Brackmann scale (HBS). Evaluation was carried out 3 and 6 weeks after treatment for all patients. Laser treatments included eight points on the affected side of the face three times a week for 6 successive weeks. FDI and HBS were used to assess the grade of recovery. The scores of both FDI and HBS were taken before as well as 3 and 6 weeks after treatment. The Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed ranks test were used to compare the FDI and HBS scores within each group. The result showed that both HILT and LLLT significantly improved the recovery of patients with Bell's palsy. Moreover, HILT was the most effective treatment modality compared to LLLT and massage with exercises. Thus, both HILT and LLLT are effective physical therapy modalities for the recovery of patients with Bell's palsy, with HILT showing a slightly greater improvement than LLLT.