Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 64
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 6: CD009758, 2017 06 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28631307

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Erysipelas and cellulitis (hereafter referred to as 'cellulitis') are common bacterial skin infections usually affecting the lower extremities. Despite their burden of morbidity, the evidence for different prevention strategies is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the beneficial and adverse effects of antibiotic prophylaxis or other prophylactic interventions for the prevention of recurrent episodes of cellulitis in adults aged over 16. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases up to June 2016: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS. We also searched five trials registry databases, and checked reference lists of included studies and reviews for further references to relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We searched two sets of dermatology conference proceedings, and BIOSIS Previews. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials evaluating any therapy for the prevention of recurrent cellulitis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently carried out study selection, data extraction, assessment of risks of bias, and analyses. Our primary prespecified outcome was recurrence of cellulitis when on treatment and after treatment. Our secondary outcomes included incidence rate, time to next episode, hospitalisation, quality of life, development of resistance to antibiotics, adverse reactions and mortality. MAIN RESULTS: We included six trials, with a total of 573 evaluable participants, who were aged on average between 50 and 70. There were few previous episodes of cellulitis in those recruited to the trials, ranging between one and four episodes per study.Five of the six included trials assessed prevention with antibiotics in participants with cellulitis of the legs, and one assessed selenium in participants with cellulitis of the arms. Among the studies assessing antibiotics, one study evaluated oral erythromycin (n = 32) and four studies assessed penicillin (n = 481). Treatment duration varied from six to 18 months, and two studies continued to follow up participants after discontinuation of prophylaxis, with a follow-up period of up to one and a half to two years. Four studies were single-centre, and two were multicentre; they were conducted in five countries: the UK, Sweden, Tunisia, Israel, and Austria.Based on five trials, antibiotic prophylaxis (at the end of the treatment phase ('on prophylaxis')) decreased the risk of cellulitis recurrence by 69%, compared to no treatment or placebo (risk ratio (RR) 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13 to 0.72; n = 513; P = 0.007), number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) six, (95% CI 5 to 15), and we rated the certainty of evidence for this outcome as moderate.Under prophylactic treatment and compared to no treatment or placebo, antibiotic prophylaxis reduced the incidence rate of cellulitis by 56% (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.89; four studies; n = 473; P value = 0.02; moderate-certainty evidence) and significantly decreased the rate until the next episode of cellulitis (hazard ratio (HR) 0.51, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.78; three studies; n = 437; P = 0.002; moderate-certainty evidence).The protective effects of antibiotic did not last after prophylaxis had been stopped ('post-prophylaxis') for risk of cellulitis recurrence (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.31; two studies; n = 287; P = 0.52), incidence rate of cellulitis (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.36; two studies; n = 287; P = 0.74), and rate until next episode of cellulitis (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.56; two studies; n = 287). Evidence was of low certainty.Effects are relevant mainly for people after at least two episodes of leg cellulitis occurring within a period up to three years.We found no significant differences in adverse effects or hospitalisation between antibiotic and no treatment or placebo; for adverse effects: RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.30; four studies; n = 469; P = 0.48; for hospitalisation: RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.57; three studies; n = 429; P = 0.47, with certainty of evidence rated low for these outcomes. The existing data did not allow us to fully explore its impact on length of hospital stay.The common adverse reactions were gastrointestinal symptoms, mainly nausea and diarrhoea; rash (severe cutaneous adverse reactions were not reported); and thrush. Three studies reported adverse effects that led to discontinuation of the assigned therapy. In one study (erythromycin), three participants reported abdominal pain and nausea, so their treatment was changed to penicillin. In another study, two participants treated with penicillin withdrew from treatment due to diarrhoea or nausea. In one study, around 10% of participants stopped treatment due to pain at the injection site (the active treatment group was given intramuscular injections of benzathine penicillin).None of the included studies assessed the development of antimicrobial resistance or quality-of-life measures.With regard to the risks of bias, two included studies were at low risk of bias and we judged three others as being at high risk of bias, mainly due to lack of blinding. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In terms of recurrence, incidence, and time to next episode, antibiotic is probably an effective preventive treatment for recurrent cellulitis of the lower limbs in those under prophylactic treatment, compared with placebo or no treatment (moderate-certainty evidence). However, these preventive effects of antibiotics appear to diminish after they are discontinued (low-certainty evidence). Treatment with antibiotic does not trigger any serious adverse events, and those associated are minor, such as nausea and rash (low-certainty evidence). The evidence is limited to people with at least two past episodes of leg cellulitis within a time frame of up to three years, and none of the studies investigated other common interventions such as lymphoedema reduction methods or proper skin care. Larger, high-quality studies are warranted, including long-term follow-up and other prophylactic measures.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Celulitis (Flemón)/prevención & control , Erisipela/prevención & control , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Selenio/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/efectos adversos , Brazo , Eritromicina/efectos adversos , Eritromicina/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Dermatosis de la Pierna/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Penicilina G Benzatina/efectos adversos , Penicilina G Benzatina/uso terapéutico , Penicilina V/efectos adversos , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Recurrencia
2.
BMJ ; 347: f4403, 2013 Jul 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23894178

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of a multifaceted educational intervention in Norwegian general practice aiming to reduce antibiotic prescription rates for acute respiratory tract infections and to reduce the use of broad spectrum antibiotics. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled study. SETTING: Existing continuing medical education groups were recruited and randomised to intervention or control. PARTICIPANTS: 79 groups, comprising 382 general practitioners, completed the interventions and data extractions. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention groups had two visits by peer academic detailers, the first presenting the national clinical guidelines for antibiotic use and recent research evidence on acute respiratory tract infections, the second based on feedback reports on each general practitioner's antibiotic prescribing profile from the preceding year. Regional one day seminars were arranged as a supplement. The control arm received a different intervention targeting prescribing practice for older patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prescription rates and proportion of non-penicillin V antibiotics prescribed at the group level before and after the intervention, compared with corresponding data from the controls. RESULTS: In an adjusted, multilevel model, the effect of the intervention on the 39 intervention groups (183 general practitioners) was a reduction (odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.84) in prescribing of antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections compared with the controls (40 continuing medical education groups with 199 general practitioners). A corresponding reduction was seen in the odds (0.64, 0.49 to 0.82) for prescribing a non-penicillin V antibiotic when an antibiotic was issued. Prescriptions per 1000 listed patients increased from 80.3 to 84.6 in the intervention arm and from 80.9 to 89.0 in the control arm, but this reflects a greater incidence of infections (particularly pneumonia) that needed treating in the intervention arm. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention led to improved antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections in a representative sample of Norwegian general practitioners, and the courses were feasible to the general practitioners. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials NCT00272155.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación Médica Continua , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/educación , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Interfaz Usuario-Computador , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Análisis por Conglomerados , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/normas , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Utilización de Medicamentos/normas , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multinivel , Noruega , Oportunidad Relativa , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
3.
Implant Dent ; 20(5): 331-6, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21881516

RESUMEN

Osteonecrosis of the jaws (ONJ) is a condition characterized by necrotic exposed bone in the jaws of patients receiving intravenous or oral bisphosphonate therapy. A review of the medical and dental literature reveals that the pathoetiology of ONJ remains unknown and there is no established link that bisphosphonates are the primary cause of this bone pathology. However, there is clinical evidence that Actinomyces may play a critical role in the pathogenesis of bisphosphonate-associated ONJ. Identification and a prolonged course of oral antimicrobial therapy may lead to complete resolution of this actinomycotic osteonecrosis.


Asunto(s)
Actinomicosis/diagnóstico , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/microbiología , Enfermedades Mandibulares/microbiología , Enfermedades Maxilares/microbiología , Actinomyces/clasificación , Actinomicosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Biopsia , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/tratamiento farmacológico , Clindamicina/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Desbridamiento , Doxiciclina/uso terapéutico , Eritromicina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Masculino , Enfermedades Mandibulares/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Maxilares/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Laryngol Otol ; 125(6): 620-5, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21310101

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of chlorhexidine gluconate and benzydamine hydrochloride mouth spray, used in conjunction with antibiotic treatment, on the intensity of clinical signs and quality of life of patients with group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis. METHODS: Patients (n = 147) with streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis were recruited and randomly allocated to either the treatment group (penicillin plus chlorhexidine and benzydamine; n = 72) or control group (penicillin plus placebo; n = 75). Blinded assessments were conducted before and after 10 days' treatment, using an intensity rating scale for clinical sign severity, a visual analogue scale for subjective health state, the Short Form 36 Health Questionnaire for quality of life, and a customised questionnaire for side effects. RESULTS: The treatment group showed a statistically significant reduction in the intensity of clinical signs, compared with the control group. On treatment day 7, there was no significant difference in quality of life between the treatment and control groups. The treatment drugs were well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: Chlorhexidine gluconate and benzydamine hydrochloride mouth spray, added to standard antibiotic treatment, significantly alleviate the intensity of clinical signs in patients with streptococcal pharyngitis. Further research is needed using larger sample sizes or alternative control groups.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Bencidamina/uso terapéutico , Clorhexidina/análogos & derivados , Faringitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Bencidamina/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vaporizadores Orales , Dolor/prevención & control , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Faringitis/microbiología , Faringitis/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/fisiopatología , Tonsilitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Tonsilitis/microbiología , Tonsilitis/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 49(11): 1703-10, 2009 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19874205

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is a rare inherited disease of the phagocyte NADPH oxidase system that causes defective production of toxic oxygen metabolites, impaired bacterial and fungal killing, and recurrent life-threatening infections, mostly by catalase-producing organisms. We report for the first time, to our knowledge, chronic infections with Actinomyces species in 10 patients with CGD. Actinomycosis is a chronic granulomatous condition that commonly manifests as cervicofacial, pulmonary, or abdominal disease, caused by slowly progressive infection with oral and gastrointestinal commensal Actinomyces species. Treatment of actinomycosis is usually simple in immunocompetent individuals, requiring long-term, high-dose intravenous penicillin, but is more complicated in those with CGD because of delayed diagnosis and an increased risk of chronic invasive or debilitating disease. METHODS: Actinomyces was identified by culture, staining, 16S ribosomal DNA polymerase chain reaction, and/or a complement fixation test in 10 patients with CGD. RESULTS: All 10 patients presented with a history of fever and elevated inflammatory signs without evident focus. Diagnosis was delayed and clinical course severe and protracted despite high-dose intravenous antibiotic therapy and/or surgery. These results suggest an unrecognized and unanticipated susceptibility to weakly pathogenic Actinomyces species in patients with CGD because these are catalase-negative organisms previously thought to be nonpathogenic in CGD. CONCLUSIONS: Actinomycosis should be vigorously sought and promptly treated in patients with CGD presenting with uncommon and prolonged clinical signs of infection. Actinomycosis is a catalase-negative infection important to consider in CGD.


Asunto(s)
Actinomyces/patogenicidad , Actinomicosis/diagnóstico , Actinomicosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/microbiología , Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/patología , Enfermedad Granulomatosa Crónica/microbiología , Actinomyces/genética , Actinomicosis/cirugía , Actinomicosis/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Médula Ósea , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Niño , Clindamicina/uso terapéutico , ADN Ribosómico/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Meropenem , Penicilina G/uso terapéutico , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Sulfametoxazol/uso terapéutico , Tienamicinas/uso terapéutico , Trimetoprim/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
6.
Br Dent J ; 206(7): 357-62, 2009 Apr 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19357666

RESUMEN

Antibiotics are the most widely prescribed category of drugs issued on prescription by general dental practitioners. Despite this there remains little evidence-based literature on what should be prescribed for any given clinical situation, at what dosage and for how long. Given the current climate of evidence-based research, the need to keep antibiotic prescribing to an acceptable minimum, increasing levels of resistance of micro-organisms and widespread hospital infections with 'superbugs', there is a distinct need for appropriate prescribing guidelines. Considering best practice, an extensive review of the literature and a thorough understanding of current empirical treatment regimes, an attempt has been made to recommend suitable antibiotic prescribing for the adult patient suffering from acute dentoalveolar infections based on evidence.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Utilización de Medicamentos/normas , Absceso Periapical/tratamiento farmacológico , Absceso Periodontal/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Clindamicina/uso terapéutico , Drenaje , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Odontología Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Absceso Periapical/microbiología , Absceso Periodontal/microbiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
7.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 13(5): 497-503, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17263835

RESUMEN

An open-label randomised clinical trial was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerance of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin plus phenethicillin for the prevention of bacterial infections in patients with high-risk neutropenia, and to monitor the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Adult patients (n = 242) scheduled to receive intensive treatment for haematological malignancies were assigned randomly to receive oral prophylaxis with either levofloxacin 500 mg once-daily (n = 122), or ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice-daily plus phenethicillin 250 mg four-times-daily (n = 120). The primary endpoint was failure of prophylaxis, defined as the first occurrence of either the need to change the prophylactic regimen or the initiation of intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics. This endpoint was observed in 89 (73.0%) of 122 levofloxacin recipients and in 85 (70.8%) of 120 ciprofloxacin plus phenethicillin recipients (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.88-1.21, p 0.71). No differences were noted between the two groups with respect to secondary outcome measures, including time to endpoint, occurrence of fever, type and number of microbiologically documented infections, and administration of intravenous antibiotics. A questionnaire revealed that levofloxacin was tolerated significantly better than ciprofloxacin plus phenethicillin. Surveillance cultures indicated the emergence of viridans group (VG) streptococci resistant to levofloxacin in 17 (14%) of 122 levofloxacin recipients; in these cases, the prophylactic regimen was adjusted. No bacteraemia with VG streptococci occurred. It was concluded that levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin plus phenethicillin are equally effective in the prevention of bacterial infections in neutropenic patients, but that levofloxacin is tolerated better. Emergence of levofloxacin-resistant VG streptococci is of concern, but appears to be a manageable problem.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Neoplasias Hematológicas/microbiología , Levofloxacino , Ofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Penicilina V/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Profilaxis Antibiótica/efectos adversos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/efectos de los fármacos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Fiebre/microbiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neutropenia/microbiología , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estreptococos Viridans/efectos de los fármacos
8.
Przegl Lek ; 64(9): 545-8, 2007.
Artículo en Polaco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18510073

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peritonsillar abscess (quinsy) is a complication of acute bacterial tonsillitis. Its treatment remains controversial. One element of controversy is the choice of antibiotics after surgical drainage of the abscess. Results of many studies support the resistance of grown bacteria to many antibiotics and the potential importance of anaerobic species in development of peritonsillar abscesses. AIM: The purpose of the study was to investigate bacteriology of peritonsillar abscesses in the group of own patients in an attempt to establish optimal method of antibiotic treatment after drainage of the abscess. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Abscess material from 12 patients aged 20-43 years (mean: 31.5, s.d.: 6.8), 4 women and 8 men, with peritonsillar abscesses was obtained by aspiration and sent for aerobic and anaerobic cultures. All patients were subsequently treated with oral phenoxymethylpenicillin (4.5 million units per day) and metronidazole (1500 mg per day). RESULTS: A total 18 bacterial isolates (9 anaerobic and 9 aerobic and facultative) were recovered, accounting for 1.5 isolate per specimen. Anaerobic bacteria only were present in 3 patients, aerobic and facultatives in 3, and mixed aerobic and anaerobic flora in 6. Single bacterial isolates were recovered in 6 infections. The predominant bacterial isolates were Streptococcus and Bacteroides. Recovery in all examined subjects was complete. CONCLUSIONS: In the routine management of peritonsillar abscess, bacteriologic studies are unnecessary on initial presentation. It is, however, necessary to consider infection with anaerobes, hence we recommend penicillin and metronidazole as the antibiotic regimen of choice in the treatment of peritonsillar abscesses.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Absceso Peritonsilar/tratamiento farmacológico , Absceso Peritonsilar/microbiología , Tonsilitis/complicaciones , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Absceso Peritonsilar/cirugía , Tonsilitis/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr ; 13(3): 226-30, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15331332

RESUMEN

Group A beta haemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) infection induce an abnormal immune response in a susceptible host. Micronutrient deficiency may affect the immune response of an individual. The aim of this study was to determine whether antioxidant vitamins could improve the abnormal immune response in GABHS infected children in rural Bangladesh. A total of 516 GABHS infected school children aged 5 to 15 years were randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1 (N=258) was treated with phenoxymethyl penicillin V and group 2 (N=258) was treated with penicillin V plus antioxidant vitamins (beta carotene, alpha tocopherol and ascorbic acid). From each group two blood samples were drawn; the first sample at the beginning of the study and another one after eight weeks. Streptococcal antibodies and immunoglobulin levels were compared between the two samples. The mean age of the study population was 10.6 years. Equal number of boys and girls were included in both groups. After treatment, antistreptolysin O (ASO) and antideoxyribonuclease B (ADNase B) titres were decreased in both groups. Serum alpha tocopherol and beta-carotene levels were increased significantly in group 2. In group 1 immunoglobulin M and A levels decreased significantly (P =0.0001) whereas immunoglobulin G showed no change. To the contrary, concentration of three immunoglobulins decreased significantly (P=0.0001) in group 2. Least-square means of between-group differences showed highly significant results for ASO, ADNase B, immunoglobulins M, A and G (P=0.0001). Our data indicate that treatment by antioxidant vitamins plus penicillin is more effective in decreasing immunological abnormalities in GABHS infected children then penicillin alone.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antioxidantes/uso terapéutico , Inmunoglobulinas/sangre , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/inmunología , Streptococcus pyogenes/patogenicidad , Adolescente , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Ácido Ascórbico/sangre , Ácido Ascórbico/uso terapéutico , Bangladesh , Niño , Preescolar , Suplementos Dietéticos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/sangre , Resultado del Tratamiento , alfa-Tocoferol/sangre , alfa-Tocoferol/uso terapéutico , beta Caroteno/sangre , beta Caroteno/uso terapéutico
10.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 78(2): 699-701, 2004 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15276555

RESUMEN

The incidence of acute rheumatic fever has seen a dramatic decline over the last 15 to 20 years in most developed countries and treatment of this disease has changed little since. The ease of travel and immigration and the cosmopolitan nature of many cities mean that occasionally the disease will come to the attention of clinicians not familiar with its presentation, resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment. We present a case of recurrent acute rheumatic fever in a patient who was initially thought to be suffering from acute bacterial endocarditis on her previously diseased rheumatic aortic valve. This culminated in her undergoing urgent aortic valve replacement during a phase of the illness that should have been treated with high dose anti-inflammatory medication. Therefore, clinicians should be aware of this condition and include it in their differential diagnosis of the febrile patient with a previous history of rheumatic fever. We briefly discuss the diagnostic dilemma of patients suffering from this condition and in differentiating it from acute endocarditis.


Asunto(s)
Errores Diagnósticos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Fiebre Reumática/diagnóstico , Cardiopatía Reumática/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/etiología , Artralgia/etiología , Bangladesh/etnología , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapéutico , Emigración e Inmigración , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Inglaterra , Femenino , Fiebre/etiología , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Humanos , Penicilina G/uso terapéutico , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Pericarditis/patología , Faringitis/etiología , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia , Fiebre Reumática/complicaciones , Fiebre Reumática/tratamiento farmacológico , Cardiopatía Reumática/complicaciones , Cardiopatía Reumática/patología , Rifampin/uso terapéutico , Procedimientos Innecesarios , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico
11.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 10(7): 615-23, 2004 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15214873

RESUMEN

A pooled analysis of two double-blind, multicentre, Phase III studies compared oral telithromycin 800 mg once-daily for 5 days with penicillin V 500 mg three-times-daily or clarithromycin 250 mg twice-daily for 10 days in the treatment of Streptococcus pyogenes (group A beta-haemolytic streptococcus; GABHS) tonsillopharyngitis. Patients aged > or = 13 years with acute GABHS tonsillopharyngitis were randomised to receive telithromycin (n = 430), penicillin (n = 197) or clarithromycin (n = 231). Clinical isolates of S. pyogenes (n = 590) obtained from throat swab samples on study entry were tested for their in-vitro susceptibility to telithromycin, clarithromycin and azithromycin. Telithromycin demonstrated in-vitro activity against the clinical isolates of S. pyogenes (MIC50/90 0.03/0.06 mg/L) higher than clarithromycin or azithromycin (MIC50/90 0.06/0.06 mg/L and 0.12/0.25 mg/L, respectively), including erythromycin-resistant strains. At the post-therapy/test of cure (TOC) visit (days 16-23), satisfactory bacteriological outcome was demonstrated for 88.3% (234/265) and 88.6% (225/254) of telithromycin- and comparator-treated patients, respectively (per-protocol population). Overall, GABHS eradication rates were 88.7% (235/265) for telithromycin and 89.0% (226/254) for comparators. The clinical cure rates at the post-therapy/TOC visit were 93.6% (248/265) and 90.9% (220/242) for telithromycin and pooled comparators, respectively. Telithromycin was generally well-tolerated. Most adverse events considered to be possibly related to study medication were gastrointestinal and of mild intensity. Discontinuations as a result of adverse events were few in both treatment groups. In conclusion, telithromycin 800 mg once-daily for 5 days was as effective as penicillin V or clarithromycin for 10 days in the treatment of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cetólidos , Macrólidos/uso terapéutico , Faringitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Streptococcus pyogenes/efectos de los fármacos , Tonsilitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Niño , Preescolar , Claritromicina/administración & dosificación , Claritromicina/farmacología , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Macrólidos/administración & dosificación , Macrólidos/farmacología , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Penicilina V/administración & dosificación , Penicilina V/farmacología , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Faringitis/microbiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/microbiología , Tonsilitis/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 23(1): 67-71, 2004 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14732316

RESUMEN

The clinical efficacy, safety and bacteriological eradication of Group A beta-haemolytic streptococci (GABHS) from the throat was studied after treatment of streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis with three commonly used oral antibiotics in a prospective, open labelled, comparative, randomised trial of 265 evaluable patients seen in one centre. All three antibiotics were administered in the recommended doses; penicillin V q8 hourly and clarithromycin q12 hourly were given for 10 days and cefprozil q12 hourly for 5 days. Clinical results and adverse events were similar for all three antibiotics used, with a prompt clinical outcome of >95%. Cefprozil had the best bacteriological eradication rate (failed to eradicate: 13.2, 15.1, 2.3; relapses: 13.2, 11.4, 5.7%, for penicillin, clarithromycin and cefprozil, respectively). Oral penicillin remains a clinically effective and safe antibiotic for the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis. However, compliance and convenience for parents and children when they are asked to follow a 10 days course, especially when the patient has improved from the second or third day, together with the high incidence of bacteriological eradication failures, is an issue.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Claritromicina/farmacología , Penicilina V/farmacología , Faringitis/microbiología , Streptococcus pyogenes/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Faringitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Seguridad , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 110(7 Pt 1): 690-5, 2001 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11465830

RESUMEN

Despite penicillin (pcV) treatment, tonsillopharyngitis caused by group A streptococci (GAS) is associated with bacterial failure rates as high as 25%. The reason for this rate of failure is not fully understood. One explanation might be that certain DNA profiles of GAS strains are responsible for treatment failures. Using arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR), we compared the DNA profiles of GAS strains from 4 patients with several treatment failures following pcV treatment of tonsillopharyngitis with the profiles of strains of the same T type from patients who were clinically and bacteriologically cured after a single course of pcV. The isolates were obtained during the same time period and from the same geographic area. Thirty-seven strains of T types 4, 12, and R28 were investigated. Eleven different DNA profiles could be detected with the AP-PCR technique. Five DNA profiles were identified as T type 12, 3 as T type 4, and 3 as T type R28. The DNA profiles of the strains from the 4 patients with several treatment failures differed, but all isolates from each one of these patients exhibited the same or a very similar profile. The DNA profiles of the failure strains were also represented in nonfailure strains. Treatment failure in these 4 patients therefore seems to be due to insufficient eradication of GAS, rather than to reinfection with a new strain. The finding that the same DNA profile can be present in both failure and nonfailure strains suggests that the treatment failure may be to some extent host-related and not only due to bacterial factors.


Asunto(s)
Resistencia a las Penicilinas/genética , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Faringitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Streptococcus pyogenes/genética , Tonsilitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Penicilina V/efectos adversos , Faringitis/microbiología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/microbiología , Streptococcus pyogenes/efectos de los fármacos , Tonsilitis/microbiología , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
14.
Schweiz Med Wochenschr ; 130(48): 1837-44, 2000 Dec 02.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11132527

RESUMEN

The benefits of oral prophylaxis for neutropenia have remained controversial up to now. We evaluated retrospectively the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin and penicillin on the prevention of bacterial infections in 112 cases of prolonged neutropenia in adult patients treated for haematological malignancies. 41 patients received prophylaxis between December 1993 and November 1994 while 71 patients did not receive prophylaxis between December 1994 and November 1995. There were no significant differences between groups in age, sex, type or stage of haemopathy, type of chemotherapy and duration of neutropenia. The antibiotic prophylaxis reduced the number of overall infections (p = 0.05) and the number of gram-negative bacteraemias (p = 0.02). The median time to the onset of fever, the duration of fever, the duration of antibiotic treatment, the duration of hospitalization or admission to the intensive care unit, the number of serious complications or death were not influenced by antibiotic prophylaxis. The prophylaxis did not reduce the overall incidence of bacteraemia, of clinically documented infections or of fever of unknown origin. This retrospective study confirms that oral prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin and penicillin decreases the incidence of infections and, in particular, of gram-negative bacteraemia, but does not modify the overall morbidity and mortality in our patients. In view of the risk of emergence of bacterial resistance, these data do not support the routine use of oral antibiotic prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/etiología , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Femenino , Fiebre/prevención & control , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/etiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
Zentralbl Veterinarmed B ; 46(4): 261-9, 1999 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10379236

RESUMEN

The present study was aimed at scrutinizing the efficacy of oral antimicrobial treatments at experimental challenge using a strain of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 2 known to cause severe disease. SPF pigs aged 10 weeks were infected intranasally and the antimicrobial treatments were initiated 5 h prior to that exposure. Several antimicrobial drugs, as well as the length of the treatment period, were elucidated. The outcome of the challenge was monitored by registration of clinical symptoms, weight gains and the development of serum antibodies to A. pleuropneumoniae. At necropsy, the magnitude of pathological lesions in the respiratory tract and the rate of reisolation of the infective strain were recorded. Animals that became diseased displayed a decreased growth rate caused, to a large extent, by a reduced feed intake. The performance with respect to daily weight gain and feed conversion corresponded well with the clinical signs developed and serologic reactions, as well as with the findings made at necropsy. The results obtained among pigs treated with enrofloxacin, but also with florfenicol or chlortetracycline, were superior to those of pigs treated with penicillin, tiamulin or tilmicosin. A positive effect was obtained using a strategic in-feed medication against infection with A. pleuropneumoniae. Provided that the drug used is effective against the target microbe, initiating treatment prior to infection appeared to be more important than the length of the treatment. It should, however, be remembered that A. pleuropneumoniae was reisolated from all but one medicated group following an experimental challenge given after initiating the medication. Consequently medical treatment as described did not eradicate the microbe.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Actinobacillus/veterinaria , Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Fluoroquinolonas , Macrólidos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Actinobacillus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Actinobacillus/fisiopatología , Administración Oral , Animales , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Clortetraciclina/administración & dosificación , Clortetraciclina/uso terapéutico , Diterpenos/administración & dosificación , Diterpenos/uso terapéutico , Enrofloxacina , Penicilina V/administración & dosificación , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Quinolonas/administración & dosificación , Quinolonas/uso terapéutico , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/fisiopatología , Tianfenicol/administración & dosificación , Tianfenicol/análogos & derivados , Tianfenicol/uso terapéutico , Tilosina/administración & dosificación , Tilosina/análogos & derivados , Tilosina/uso terapéutico
16.
Clin Infect Dis ; 27(4): 845-50, 1998 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9798043

RESUMEN

In an open-label, randomized trial, 44 Vietnamese children with diphtheria were given penicillin therapy (intramuscular benzylpenicillin, 50,000 U/[kg.d] for 5 days and then oral penicillin, 50 mg/[kg.d] for 5 days), and 42 were given erythromycin therapy (50 mg/[kg.d] orally for 10 days). There were no differences in times to membrane clearance or bacteriologic clearance, but median times to fever clearance were 27 hours (95% confidence interval [CI], 19-30; range, 0-124 hours) for penicillin recipients and 46 hours (95% CI, 34-54; range, 0-148 hours) for erythromycin recipients (P = .0004). In the penicillin group, acute treatment failed for one patient, and one patient relapsed. Three patients in the penicillin group developed diphtheritic myocarditis as evidenced by abnormal electrocardiograms. Erythromycin did not cause prolongation of the QT interval corrected for heart rate. Cultures of specimens from 15 patients (17.4%) were positive for toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae. All isolates were susceptible to penicillin, but for isolates (27%), all of which were from patients who received penicillin treatment, were resistant to erythromycin (minimum inhibitory concentrations, > 64 mg/L). Penicillin is recommended as first-line treatment for diphtheria in Vietnam.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Difteria/tratamiento farmacológico , Eritromicina/uso terapéutico , Penicilina G/uso terapéutico , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Penicilinas/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Corynebacterium diphtheriae/efectos de los fármacos , Difteria/complicaciones , Difteria/microbiología , Difteria/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Penicilina G/administración & dosificación , Penicilina V/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 19(4): 327-33, 1997.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9256832

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the consequences of prolonged prophylactic penicillin use on the rates of nasopharyngeal colonization with Streptococcus pneumoniae and the prevalence of resistant pneumococcal strains in children with sickle cell anemia. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal specimens were obtained from children with sickle cell anemia (Hb SS or Hb S beta degrees thalassemia) at 10 teaching hospitals throughout the United States. These patients were participating in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in which they were prescribed prophylactic penicillin before their fifth birthday and were randomized to prophylactic penicillin or placebo after their fifth birthday (PROPS II). The specimens were cultured for S. pneumoniae, and isolates were analyzed for antimicrobial susceptibility to nine commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents. RESULTS: Of the 226 patients observed, an average of 8.4 specimens were collected per patient. From 1,896 individual culture specimens, 5.5% of the specimens were positive for S. pneumoniae; 27% of patients had at least one positive culture. Nine percent of the study patients had at least one isolate of penicillin intermediate or resistant pneumococci. There was no significant difference in the percent of positive cultures for S. pneumoniae in those patients given penicillin prophylaxis after 5 years of age (4.1%) compared with those patients given placebo after 5 years of age (6.4%). Likewise, there was no significant difference (p = 0.298) in the percent of patients with at least one positive culture for S. pneumoniae in the group given prophylactic penicillin after 5 years of age (21.8%) compared with the group given placebo after 5 years of age (28.3%). There was no difference between the penicillin and placebo groups in the proportion of patients with penicillin intermediate or resistant pneumococci, but there was a trend toward increased carriage of multiply drug-resistant pneumococci in children > 5 years of age receiving prophylactic penicillin compared to children > 5 years of age receiving placebo. The increased colonization rate with multiply drug-resistant organisms of children > 5 years of age receiving penicillin prophylaxis is not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The potential for continued penicillin prophylaxis to contribute to the development of multiply resistant pneumococci should be considered before continuing penicillin prophylaxis in children with sickle cell anemia who are older than 5 years of age. Added to the published data from PROPS II, which demonstrated no apparent advantage to continue prophylaxis, the data support the conclusion that, for children with no history of invasive pneumococcal disease, consideration should be given to discontinue prophylactic penicillin after their fifth birthday.


Asunto(s)
Anemia de Células Falciformes/complicaciones , Anemia de Células Falciformes/microbiología , Nasofaringe/microbiología , Resistencia a las Penicilinas , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Penicilinas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Preescolar , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Enfermedades Nasofaríngeas/microbiología , Enfermedades Nasofaríngeas/prevención & control , Placebos , Estudios Prospectivos
19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8734709

RESUMEN

PROBLEM: Antibiotics are often prescribed indiscriminately to treat endodontic emergencies. OBJECTIVES: This study examined (1) the effect of penicillin supplementation on reduction of symptoms and (2) the course of recovery of localized acute apical abscess after emergency treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with pulp necrosis and periapical pain and/or localized swelling were considered. Those eligible did not have any signs of spreading infections. Patients received appropriate local treatment, and a double-blind protocol was used to randomly assign them to one of three groups: penicillin VK group, placebo group, or neither medication group. All received ibuprofen 600 mg four times daily for 24 hours. Patients entered their pre- and postoperative pain and swelling experience on a visual analog scale for up to 72 hours. RESULTS: Resolution was fairly rapid in most patients. Statistical analysis of the scores of 32 respondents revealed no significant differences (at p < 0.05) between the three groups in course of recovery or symptoms at any time period. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with localized periapical pain or swelling generally recovered quickly with local treatment. The data did not show a demonstrable benefit from penicillin supplementation.


Asunto(s)
Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Absceso Periapical/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Aguda , Análisis de Varianza , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/uso terapéutico , Dimensión del Dolor , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 18(5): 429-35, 1995 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7572762

RESUMEN

Aminoglycoside-containing combination therapy has been the standard empirical approach for febrile neutropenic cancer patients. With the advent of the broad-spectrum oral fluoroquinolones, it is now possible to evaluate an initial empirical alternative therapy. A prospective randomized study was conducted comparing oral ciprofloxacin plus penicillin V (group A) with amikacin plus carbenicillin or ceftazidime (group B). Main criteria for eligibility were febrile patients with solid tumor or nonlymphoblastic lymphoma, a Zubrod PS equal to 1 or 2, no diarrhea, mucositis, or long-term central venous catheter. A total of 108 consecutive neutropenic febrile episodes were randomized (5 exclusions); 55 episodes were assigned to group A and 48 to group B. Most febrile episodes were of unknown origin. There were 10 microbiologically documented episodes with two cases of bacteremia. Both regimens were well tolerated. Oral regimen was substantially cheaper than parenteral regimen. Treatment success without regimen modification was 94.5% for group A and 93.8% for group B (p = .86; CI -0.08-0.10). Oral therapy with ciprofloxacin and penicillin V is a safe alternative to standard parenteral therapy in this low-risk group of neutropenic patients, with unquestionable cost containment.


Asunto(s)
Amicacina/uso terapéutico , Carbenicilina/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/etiología , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Adulto , Amicacina/administración & dosificación , Amicacina/economía , Carbenicilina/administración & dosificación , Carbenicilina/economía , Ceftazidima/administración & dosificación , Ceftazidima/economía , Ciprofloxacina/administración & dosificación , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Quimioterapia Combinada/economía , Femenino , Fiebre de Origen Desconocido/tratamiento farmacológico , Fiebre de Origen Desconocido/economía , Fiebre de Origen Desconocido/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/economía , Neutropenia/economía , Penicilina V/administración & dosificación , Penicilina V/economía , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA