Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 13(6): e0198207, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29856812

RESUMEN

GALT is an important antigen of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (APP), which was shown to provide partial protection against APP infection in a previous study in our lab. The main purpose of the present study is to investigate GALT induced cross-protection between different APP serotypes and elucidate key mechanisms of the immune response to GALT antigenic stimulation. Bioinformatic analysis demonstrated that galT is a highly conserved gene in APP, widely distributed across multiple pathogenic strains. Homologies between any two strains ranges from 78.9% to 100% regarding the galT locus. Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) confirmed that GALT specific antibodies could not be induced by inactivated APP L20 or MS71 whole cell bacterin preparations. A recombinant fusion GALT protein derived from APP L20, however has proven to be an effective cross-protective antigen against APP sevorar 1 MS71 (50%, 4/8) and APP sevorar 5b L20 (75%, 6/8). Histopathological examinations have confirmed that recombinant GALT vaccinated animals showed less severe pathological signs in lung tissues than negative controls after APP challenge. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis indicated that the infiltration of neutrophils in the negative group is significantly increased compared with that in the normal control (P<0.001) and that in surviving animals is decreased compared to the negative group. Anti-GALT antibodies were shown to mediate phagocytosis of neutrophils. After interaction with anti-GALT antibodies, survival rate of APP challenged vaccinated animals was significantly reduced (P<0.001). This study demonstrated that GALT is an effective cross-protective antigen, which could be used as a potential vaccine candidate against multiple APP serotypes.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Actinobacillus/veterinaria , Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae/inmunología , Antígenos Bacterianos/inmunología , Vacunas Bacterianas/inmunología , Pleuroneumonía/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/prevención & control , UDP-Glucosa-Hexosa-1-Fosfato Uridiltransferasa/inmunología , Infecciones por Actinobacillus/prevención & control , Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae/clasificación , Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae/genética , Animales , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/biosíntesis , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/inmunología , Antígenos Bacterianos/genética , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Proteínas Bacterianas/inmunología , Secuencia Conservada , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/veterinaria , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Inmunización Secundaria , Inmunoglobulina G/biosíntesis , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Pulmón/patología , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Infiltración Neutrófila/inmunología , Fagocitosis/inmunología , Pleuroneumonía/patología , Pleuroneumonía/prevención & control , Distribución Aleatoria , Alineación de Secuencia , Homología de Secuencia de Aminoácido , Serogrupo , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/inmunología , UDP-Glucosa-Hexosa-1-Fosfato Uridiltransferasa/genética , Vacunación/veterinaria
2.
Aust Vet J ; 82(6): 370-4, 2004 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15272463

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of two new-generation porcine pleuropneumonia vaccines when challenged with Australian isolates of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae of serovars 1 and 15. DESIGN: The Porcilis APP vaccine and an experimental streptomycin-dependent strain of A pleuropneumoniae were evaluated in a standardised pen trial. Each vaccine/challenge group consisted of 10 pigs. RESULTS: With the serovar 1 challenge, the Porcilis APP vaccine and the live vaccine, compared with the control group, gave significant protection in terms of clinical signs, lung lesions, re-isolation scores and average daily gain (ADG) postchallenge. Only the Porcilis APP vaccine provided significant protection against mortality. In the serovar 15 challenged pigs, the only significant difference detected was that the Porcilis APP vaccinated pigs had a better postchallenge ADG than the controls. None of the Porcilis APP vaccinated pigs showed signs of depression postvaccination and none were euthanased after challenge with either serovar 1 or 15. The pigs vaccinated with the live vaccine showed obvious depression after each vaccination and a total of 3 pigs were euthanased after challenge (one with serovar 1 and two with serovar 15). CONCLUSIONS: Both of the vaccines provided significant protection against a severe challenge with serovar 1 A pleuropneumoniae. Neither vaccine was effective against a serovar 15 A pleuropneumoniae challenge. There was evidence that the Porcilis APP vaccine did provide some protection against the serovar 15 challenge because the ADG, after challenge of pigs given this vaccine, was greater than the control pigs.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Actinobacillus/veterinaria , Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae/inmunología , Vacunas Bacterianas/uso terapéutico , Pleuroneumonía/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/prevención & control , Infecciones por Actinobacillus/prevención & control , Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Pleuroneumonía/prevención & control , Estreptomicina/farmacología , Porcinos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA