A rs-fMRI study of functional connectivity changes between thalamus and postcentral gyrus in patients with neuropathic pain after brachial plexus avulsion.

BACKGROUND: The neuropathic pain (NPP) after brachial plexus avulsion (BPA) is common and difficult to cure, and thalamus and postcentral gyrus have been accepted to be the key nodes of mechanisms and pathways for pain. However, little attention has been paid on the thalamus-postcentral gyrus functional connectivity changes in NP patients after BPA. METHODS: Eighteen patients with NPP after BPA and twenty age and gender matched healthy controls were enrolled and underwent resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) scans in this study. The Pearson's r-value of functional connection (bilateral thalamus and postcentral gyrus as regions of interest) was generated and examined using two sample t-test. The linear regression analysis was used to select possible related factors, and multiple linear regression of the possible predictors was used to identify the variables that significantly predicted Visual Analogue Score (VAS). RESULTS: The standardized Pearson r-values of the left thalamus-right thalamus, left thalamus-left postcentral gyrus, left thalamus-right postcentral gyrus, right thalamus-left postcentral gyrus and right thalamus-right postcentral gyrus in the control group were 0.759 ± 0.242, 0.358 ± 0.297, 0.383 ± 0.270, 0.317 ± 0.295 and 0.333 ± 0.304, respectively. And the corresponding standardized Pearson r-values in patients group were 0.510 ± 0.224,0.305 ± 0.212,0.281 ± 0.225,0.333 ± 0.193 and 0.333 ± 0.210, respectively. The functional connectivity strength of the left thalamus-right thalamus in control group was significantly higher than that in the patients group (P < 0.05). Linear regression analysis showed that the functional connectivity strength of the left thalamus-right thalamus was negatively correlated with the patients' VAS score (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: NPP patients after BPA had a significant pain-related bilateral thalamus functional connection reorganization, with the purpose to limit the pain signal inputs within the unilateral cerebral hemisphere.

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on the Brachial Plexus With Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Technique: A Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this case series was to assess the safety and effectiveness of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) of the brachial plexus performed using a low invasive percutaneous approach with ultrasound guide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients affected by neuropathic pain with a documented brachial plexus partial avulsion were included in this observational study. A totally implantable PNS system specifically designed for peripheral placement (Neurimpulse, Padua, Italy) was implanted and followed for 18 months, recording the level of pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]), therapy satisfaction (Patient Global Impression of Improvement), quality of life (Short Form Health Survey questionnaire), and change in drug consumption and work status. Descriptive statistic (mean and SD) was used to compare pre- and postimplantation differences. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were included in the observational study; 16 of them proceeded with the permanent implantation. System infection (N = 1) and lead migrations (N = 2) were recorded during a follow-up mean of 14.8 ± 5.4 months. The average NRS reduction at 18 months was 41%. Average quality-of-life physical and mental indexes increased by 14% and 32%, respectively. Drug intake was stopped in 22% and reduced in 56% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: PNS systems of the brachial plexus implanted with percutaneous approach appear to be safe and effective in a follow-up period of 18 months. Longer and larger studies are needed to confirm and extend these outcomes.

Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome and other Forms of Cervical Brachial Syndrome Treated with Plasma Concentrate Enriched for Alpha 2 Macroglobulin.

BACKGROUND: Existing therapies for myofascial and neuralgic forms of cervicobrachial pain may have unsatisfactory outcomes. Alternative therapies may be considered, particularly for individuals who have failed to respond. Contemporary conceptualizations of chronic pain mechanisms include the contribution of inflammatory factors; therefore, locally targeted antiinflammatory administrations may play a role in treatment of cervicobrachial pain.Alpha 2 macroglobulin (A2M) is a plasma protein that acts as a molecular trap for inflammatory factors such as tumor necrosis factor. After plasma is enriched for A2M, it may be considered as a possible injectable agent to counteract inflammation that may occur with a cervicobrachial pain syndrome. OBJECTIVES: This retrospective review evaluates patient response to the use of plasma concentrate enriched for alpha 2 macroglobulin (A2M-PPP) in treatment of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) and other forms of cervical brachial syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: Observational Study. SETTING: Outpatient interventional neurology practice. METHODS: There were 62 patients, including 46 women and 16 men ages 23-77 years. Twenty-three of these patients were diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) or fibromyalgia, 18 with TOS, and 21 with musculotendinous pain (MTP). At baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months, patient status was evaluated with a Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) that included a composite pain score and a functional interference score. Patients were asked to estimate overall satisfaction with a Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale. Criterion for clinically significant improvement included >30% betterment in the BPI pain and functional interference subscales and a PGIC of > 5 at the 3-month mark. RESULTS: Three patients, one with CRPS and 2 with TOS, complained of several days of worsened pain or dysesthesias. No serious or permanent complications were encountered. For patients with TOS at the 3-month mark, 61% achieved clinical endpoints of success compared with 35% with CRPS/fibromyalgia and 24% for patients with MTP (P < 0.05, chi-square). By 6 months, 22% of individuals in the neuropathic TOS group had > 30% improvements in pain and functional interference scores compared with 13% of the individuals in the CRPS/fibromyalgia group and 18% in the MTP group. LIMITATIONS: This article does not differentiate the added benefit of A2M-PPP from hydrodissection alone. Additionally, this article does not evaluate the actual benefit of the A2M molecule apart from other factors present in the platelet-poor concentrate such as exosomes and cytokines. With the advent of pure engineered A2M, more focused studies will be possible. Also, an independent assay was not done, and therefore we cannot be precisely sure about the exact quantity of platelets, if any, which were contained in the platelet-poor concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that A2M-PPP, when injected into muscle, tendon, and epineurium with live ultrasound guidance, appears to be relatively safe and free of postinjection inflammatory reactions that are often seen after platelet-poor plasma injection. A2M-PPP appears to be associated more frequently with good outcomes when injected into brachial plexus targets in patients with TOS compared with outcomes observed after injection of the plexus in patients with CRPS/fibromyalgia. KEY WORDS: Plasma concentrate enriched for alpha 2 macroglobulin, neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome, cervical brachial syndrome.

Single- versus double-injection costoclavicular block: a randomized comparison.

BACKGROUND: The costoclavicular approach targets the brachial plexus in the proximal infraclavicular fossa, where the lateral, medial, and posterior cords are tightly bundled together. This randomized trial compared single- and double-injection ultrasound-guided costoclavicular blocks. We selected onset time as the primary outcome and hypothesized that, compared with its single-injection counterpart, the double-injection technique would result in a swifter onset. METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing upper limb surgery (at or below the elbow joint) were randomly allocated to receive a single- (n=45) or double-injection (n=45) ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block. The local anesthetic agent (35 mL of lidocaine 1%-bupivacaine 0.25%with epinephrine 5 µg/mL and 2 mg of preservative-free dexamethasone) was identical in all subjects. In the single-injection group, the entire volume of local anesthetic was injected between the three cords of the brachial plexus. In the double-injection group, the first half of the volume was administered in this location; the second half was deposited between the medial cord and the subclavian artery. After the performance of the block, a blinded observer recorded the onset time (defined as the time required to achieve a minimal sensorimotor composite score of 14 out of 16 points), success rate (surgical anesthesia) and block-related pain scores. Performance time and the number of needle passes were also recorded during the performance of the block. The total anesthesia-related time was defined as the sum of the performance and onset times. RESULTS: Compared with its single-injection counterpart, the double-injection technique displayed shorter onset time (16.6 (6.4) vs 23.4 (6.9) min; p<0.001; 95% CI for difference 3.9 to 9.7) and total anesthesia-related time (22.5 (6.7) vs 28.9 (7.6) min; p<0.001). No intergroup differences were found in terms of success and technical execution (ie, performance time/procedural pain). The double-injection group required more needle passes than the single-injection group (2 (1-4) vs 1 (1-3); p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with its single-injection counterpart, double-injection costoclavicular block results in shorter onset and total anesthesia-related times. Further investigation is required to determine if a triple-injection technique (with targeted local anesthetic injection around each cord of the brachial plexus) could further decrease the onset time. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03595514.

Ultrasound Guidance Enhances the Efficiency of Brachial Plexus Block and Ameliorates the Vascular Injury Compared with Nerve Stimulator Guidance in Hand Surgery Patients.

Background: Nerve stimulation guidance and ultrasound guidance are two major methods that have been widely accepted and applied in axillary brachial plexus block. However, the differences between the effects of these two types of guidance still need to be further elucidated for clinical usage. Materials and Methods: Overall, 208 patients undergoing elective upper limb surgeries and receiving axillary brachial plexus block were recruited in our study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either ultrasound guidance (group U, n = 112) or nerve stimulation (group N, n = 96). Pinprick test was performed for assessing the sensory blockades. The pain was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels were measured by dichloro-dihydro-fluorescein diacetate staining and serum levels of nitric oxide (NO), nitric oxide synthases (NOS), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1) were evaluated by ELISA. Results: Ultrasound guidance significantly enhanced the quality of the sensory blockade and reduced the VAS scores when compared with the nerve stimulator guidance. In addition, the production of ROS, NO, NOS, TNF-α, and MCP-1 were significantly alleviated by ultrasound guidance. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block relieves pain during operation, provides higher success rates in the nerve block, causes less vascular damage and results in lower levels of inflammatory cytokines secretion when compared with neurostimulator-directed brachial plexus blockage.

Traumatic brachial plexus injury rehabilitation using neuromuscular electrical muscle stimulation in a polytrauma patient.

We report a 28-year-old man admitted postmotorcycle versus car in September 2017. The patient sustained multiple injuries in both the upper and lower limbs. He sustained a complex brachial plexus injury on his left side and was transferred immediately to Stanmore Hospital to undergo specialist surgery (supraclavicular brachial plexus exploration and neurolysis) to repair his brachial plexus injury. The patient was transferred back to the specialist trauma ward for additional surgeries for his subsequent injuries. Due to the complexity of the injury and surgery the patient was not able to start rehabilitation until six weeks post operation, at which point he was referred to outpatient physiotherapy. Prior to this his left upper limb was in a sling but was instructed to move it as able. The patient commenced his comprehensive physiotherapy programme in January 2018.

Brachial plexus block of the posterior and the lateral cord using ropivacaine 7.5 mg/mL.

BACKGROUND: We recently showed that the novel combination of a superficial cervical plexus block, a suprascapular nerve block, and the lateral sagittal infraclavicular brachial plexus block (LSIB) provides an alternative anaesthetic method for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. In this study, we hypothesised that the LSIB dose for this shoulder block could be significantly reduced by injecting only towards the shoulder relevant posterior and lateral cords. Our aim was to determine the minimum effective volume in 50% of the patients (MEV50 ) and to estimate the MEV95, when using ropivacaine 7.5 mg/mL to block these cords. METHODS: Twenty-three adult patients scheduled for hand surgery participated in the study. Considering the artery as a clock face with 12 o'clock ventral, the designated volume was injected immediately outside the arterial wall and between 8 and 9 o´clock. The in-plane technique was used. Block success was assessed 30 minutes after withdrawal of the needle. Successful posterior cord block was defined as anaesthesia or analgesia of the axillary nerve. Successful lateral cord block was defined as either anaesthesia or analgesia, or >50% motor block of the musculocutaneous nerve. MEV50 was determined by the staircase up-and-down method. Logistic regression and probit transformation were applied to estimate MEV95 . RESULTS: MEV50 and MEV95 were 7.8 mL [95% confidence interval (CI), 7.3-8.4] and 9.0 mL (95% CI, 7.8-10.3), respectively. CONCLUSION: For single-deposit infraclavicular posterior and lateral cord block, the MEV95 of ropivacaine 7.5 mg/mL was estimated to 9.0 mL.

Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Nerve Block With an Ultralow Volume of Local Anesthetic for Post-Thoracotomy Shoulder Girdle Pain.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve block using an ultralow volume of local anesthetic (5 mL of ropivacaine, 0.75%) for the management of post-thoracotomy shoulder girdle pain. DESIGN: Open-cohort, prospective, single-center study. SETTING: University hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Patients with post-thoracotomy shoulder girdle pain (visual analog scale [VAS] ≥5) received an ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve block. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty minutes after block implementation, the VAS was used to quantify pain across the shoulder girdle. The index (I) was calculated to indicate improvement of pain as follows: [Formula: see text] Nerve bocks resulting in I ≥75% were considered excellent. Total tramadol consumption 36 hours after nerve blocks, patients' satisfaction, and complications related to the procedure also were assessed. Patients were segregated in the following 2 groups: group A, which comprised patients with pain in the shoulder area (glenohumeral and acromioclavicular joints) (n = 30), and group B, which comprised patients with pain in the scapula (n = 17). I was significantly greater in group A (88.3% ± 14%) than in group B (43.2% ± 22%). In groups A and B, 90% and 11% of patients, respectively, demonstrated excellent pain control. Total tramadol consumption in group A, 25 (0-100) mg, was significantly less that of group B, 250 (150-500) mg. Patients' satisfaction also was significantly higher in group A compared with group B. No complications were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve block can substantially alleviate post-thoracotomy pain in the shoulder but not in the scapular area.

Intrathecal Spread of Injectate Following an Ultrasound-Guided Selective C5 Nerve Root Injection in a Human Cadaver Model.

Ultrasound-guided selective C5 nerve root blocks have been described in several case reports as a safe and effective means to anesthetize the distal clavicle while maintaining innervation of the upper extremity and preserving diaphragmatic function. In this study, cadavers were injected with 5 mL of 0.5% methylene blue dye under ultrasound guidance to investigate possible proximal and distal spread of injectate along the brachial plexus, if any. Following the injections, the specimens were dissected and examined to determine the distribution of dye and the structures affected. One injection revealed dye extended proximally into the epidural space, which penetrated the dura mater and was present on the spinal cord and brainstem. Dye was noted distally to the divisions in 3 injections. The anterior scalene muscle and phrenic nerve were stained in all 4 injections. It appears unlikely that local anesthetic spread is limited to the nerve root following an ultrasound-guided selective C5 nerve root injection. Under certain conditions, intrathecal spread also appears possible, which has major patient safety implications. Additional safety measures, such as injection pressure monitoring, should be incorporated into this block, or approaches that are more distal should be considered for the acute pain management of distal clavicle fractures.

Combined Spinal Cord Stimulation and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Brachial Plexopathy: A Case Report.

Brachial plexopathy usually results from an iatrogenic brachial plexus injury and can sometimes cause severe chronic pain and disability. There are a number of possible treatments for this condition, including medication, physical therapy, nerve blocks, and neuromodulation, but they are not always successful. Recently, combined spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) have been tried for various chronic pain diseases because of their different mechanisms of action.Here, we describe the case of a 54-year-old man who was diagnosed with brachial plexopathy 8 years ago. He underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to remove a superior mediastinal mass. However, his brachial plexus was damaged during the surgery. Although he had received various treatments, the pain did not improve. For the management of intractable severe pain, he underwent SCS 2 years ago, which initially reduced his pain from numeric rating scale (NRS) 10/10 to NRS 4 - 5/10, but the pain then gradually increased, reaching NRS 8/10, 6 months ago. At that time, he was refractory to other treatments, and we therefore applied PNS in combination with SCS. The PNS electrode was positioned on the radial nerve under ultrasound guidance. After combined PNS and SCS, his background pain disappeared, although a breakthrough pain (NRS 3 - 4/10) was caused intermittently by light touch. Furthermore, the patient's need for analgesics decreased, and he was satisfied with the outcome of this combined treatment. We concluded that combined SCS and PNS is a very useful treatment modality, which can stimulate the target nerve both directly and indirectly, and hence, relieve pain from brachial plexopathy.

Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block Anesthesia.

Superficial nerves can be visualized through ultrasonography in the cattle and facilitate local anesthetic disposition around nerve structures. Expected advantages include a higher successful rate of nerve block improving the degree and duration of the block. Among others, conduction nerves of clinical interest in cattle include the paravertebral nerves, nerves of the epidural space, the brachial plexus, and the sciatic and femoral nerves, and nerves of the head.

Incidence of clinically symptomatic pneumothorax in ultrasound-guided infraclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

The use of periclavicular brachial plexus block as regional anaesthesia for surgical procedures on the upper extremity is common. However, the proximity of the pleura results in a risk of pneumothorax. Without ultrasound monitoring, the pneumothorax risk has been reported to be as high as 6.1%. We conducted a prospective, observational study to examine the risk of pneumothorax in 6366 ultrasound-guided periclavicular plexus blocks. All patients with a clinically manifest and radiologically confirmed pneumothorax were analysed. Clinically symptomatic pneumothorax occurred in four patients (0.06%; 95% CI 0.001-0.124), in three of them after a two-day latency period. Ultrasound guidance does therefore appear to reduce the risk of pneumothorax. Although all of the anaesthesiologists involved in the complications had previously performed fewer than 20 blocks, we are not able to confirm that a block experience ≤ 20 is a significant risk factor. Faulty image-setting, inability to obtain a view of the needle tip and inadequate supervision are likely to be important risk factors.

[Comparison of ultrasound and nerve stimulation techniques for brachial plexus block for regional hemodynamic changes of upper extremity].

OBJECTIVE: To compare ultrasound guidance versus nerve stimulator guidance supraclavicular brachial plexus block for regional hemodynamic changes of upper extremity. METHODS: Sixty ASA I-II patients scheduled for upper extremity operation were randomly assigned to receive a supraclavicular brachial plexus block guided by either ultrasound (U group, n = 30) or nerve stimulation (N group, n = 30).20 ml mixture of equal volumes of 2% lidocaine and 0.75% ropivacaine was injected in both groups. Regional hemodynamic parameters were measured in the ipsilateral ulnar artery and radial artery, using pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound, before and 30 minutes after the block. Regional hemodynamic parameters included peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), time averaged maximum velocity (TAMAX), resistance index (RI), pulsatility index (PI), cross-sectional area (Area) and Blood flow (Q). The intensity of sensory block was measured at 30 minutes after the block. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the hemodynamic parameters of ulnar artery and radial artery before the block between two groups. Compared with N group, EDV, TAMAX and Q of ulnar artery were higher in U group (1.88-fold, 1.71-fold and 1.84-fold)(P < 0.01 or P < 0.05), PI and RI of ulnar artery were lower in U group (P < 0.01) at 30 minutes after the block, EDV of radial artery was higher in U group (1.47-fold) (P < 0.01), PI and RI of radial artery were lower in U group (P < 0.05) at 30 minutes after the block. Comparing the hemodynamic parameters of ulnar artery and radial artery with complete block between two groups at 30 minutes after the block, EDV, TAMAX and Q of ulnar artery in U group were higher than that in N group (1.68-fold, 1.55-fold and 1.62-fold) (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05), PI of ulnar artery in U group was lower than that in N group (P < 0.01), EDV and TAMAX of radial artery in U group was higher than that in N group (1.54-fold and 1.26-fold) (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05), PI and RI of radial artery in U group was lower than that in N group (P < 0.05). The rate of complete block in U group was higher than that in N group (28/30 vs 22/30, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block enhance the degree of sympathetic block of upper extremity, especially of ulnar artery and increase the blood flow of ulnar artery compared with nerve stimulator.

Effective volume of ropivacaine 0.75% through a catheter required for interscalene brachial plexus blockade.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound guidance during peripheral nerve blocks has allowed for reduction in dose and volume of local anesthetic required to accomplish successful blockade using multiple injections through a needle. The authors undertook this study to determine the minimal effective volume required to accomplish successful interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) through the catheter. METHODS: After obtaining institutional ethics committee approval and written informed consent, patients aged 18-75 yr and scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery under ISB were enrolled. All patients using a step-up/step-down method and the starting dose of 15 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine received an ultrasound-guided ISB catheter. The injection volume was increased or decreased by 1 ml in case of block failure or block success, respectively. RESULTS: The authors found that the proportion of patients with successful blockade increased sharply from approximately 57% at 6 ml to 100% by 7 ml, indicating that a small increase in volume of ropivacaine 0.75% markedly affects the success rate. A total of 12 ISB with injection volume less than 7 ml resulted in successful anesthesia within 30 min, yielding an ED95 of 7 ml (95% CI 6.8-7.2) ropivacaine 0.75%. For the group as a whole, the median (min-max) sensory block onset time was 5 (5-20) min, the median (min-max) motor blocks for the biceps and the deltoid muscles were 7.5 (5-15) min and 10 (5-15) min, respectively. The median (min-max) block duration was 8.9 (3-15) h. CONCLUSIONS: An injection of a minimum of 7 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% through the catheter is required for success rate and timely onset of surgical anesthesia with ISB.

Electrostimulation with or without ultrasound-guidance in interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder surgery.

In a prospective controlled trial to compare conventional interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) using anatomic landmarks and electro-stimulation with a combined technique of ultrasound guidance followed by nerve stimulation, 60 patients were randomized into 2 matched equal groups: Group A using nerve stimulation (NS) alone and Group B using the combination of ultrasound and NS. The time to detect the plexus (3.9 ± 4 min in Group A and 3.3 ± 1.4 min in Group B) was not significantly different. We needed to reposition the needle once (n = 13) or twice (n = 4) in Group B. First-shot motor response was achieved in all but one patient in Group A; here we were only able to locate the plexus by use of ultrasound. None of the patients needed general anaesthesia. There were no significant differences between postoperative pain, motor power, or patient's satisfaction. ISBPB seems similarly effective using electro-stimulation and ultrasound if performed by experienced anesthesiologists.

Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block enhances postoperative blood flow in arteriovenous fistulas.

OBJECTIVE: Brachial plexus block offers several advantages when creating vascular access for hemodialysis. However, no controlled studies have directly evaluated arteriovenous fistula (AVF) blood flow in patients anesthetized by this method. We compared the effects of ultrasound-guided, infraclavicular brachial plexus block and local infiltration anesthesia on blood flow in the radial artery and AVF during the early and late postoperative periods. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomly assigned to an experimental group, which received infraclavicular brachial plexus block (IB), or to a control (C) group that received local infiltration anesthesia. Blood flow in the distal radial artery was measured before and after IB or infiltration anesthesia. AVF flow during the early and late postoperative period was evaluated using duplex ultrasound imaging. The rates of primary fistula failure were also compared. RESULTS: After anesthesia, preoperative radial arterial flow was 56 ± 8.6 mL/min in group IB vs 40.7 ± 6.11 mL/min in group C (P < .0001). Blood flow in the fistula, measured in mL/min at 3 hours, 7 days, and 8 weeks postoperatively, was also greater in group 1B vs group C, respectively, at 69.6 ± 7.9 vs 44.8 ± 13.8 (P < .001), 210.6 ± 30.9 vs 129 ± 36.1 (P < .001), and 680.6 ± 96.7 vs 405.3 ± 76.2 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: When used for AVF access surgery, infraclavicular brachial plexus block provides higher blood flow in the radial artery and AVF than is achieved with infiltration anesthesia.