Ceftazidime-avibactam versus polymyxins in treating patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) pose a significant threat to human health and have emerged as a major public health concern. We aimed to compare the efficacy and the safety of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and polymyxin in the treatment of CRE infections. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching the databases of EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. Published studies on the use of CAZ-AVI and polymyxin in the treatment of CRE infections were collected from the inception of the database until March 2023. Two investigators independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies and extracted the data. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. RESULTS: Ten articles with 833 patients were included (CAZ-AVI 325 patients vs Polymyxin 508 patients). Compared with the patients who received polymyxin-based therapy, the patients who received CAZ-AVI therapy had significantly lower 30-days mortality (RR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.01-2.34; I2 = 22%; P < 0.00001), higher clinical cure rate (RR = 2.70; 95% CI 1.67-4.38; I2 = 40%; P < 0.00001), and higher microbial clearance rate (RR = 2.70; 95% CI 2.09-3.49; I2 = 0%; P < 0.00001). However, there was no statistically difference in the incidence of acute kidney injury between patients who received CAZ-AVI and polymyxin therapy (RR = 1.38; 95% CI 0.69-2.77; I2 = 22%; P = 0.36). In addition, among patients with CRE bloodstream infection, those who received CAZ-AVI therapy had significantly lower mortality than those who received polymyxin therapy (RR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.27-0.69, I2 = 26%, P < 0.00004). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to polymyxin, CAZ-AVI demonstrated superior clinical efficacy in the treatment of CRE infections, suggesting that CAZ-AVI may be a superior option for CRE infections.

Synergistic effects of polymyxin and vancomycin combinations on carbapenem- and polymyxin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and their molecular characteristics.

IMPORTANCE: This study provides insights into the mechanisms of polymyxin resistance in K. pneumoniae clinical isolates and demonstrates potential strategies of polymyxin and vancomycin combinations for combating this resistance. We also identified possible mechanisms that might be associated with the treatment of these combinations against carbapenem- and polymyxin-resistant K. pneumoniae clinical isolates. The findings have significant implications for the development of alternative therapies and the effective management of infections caused by these pathogens.

[Advances in the diagnosis and treatment strategy of polymyxin resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae].

In recent years, the detection rate of multidrug-resistant and pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae has increased year on year, so polymyxin has received increasing attention as an antibiotic that is still sensitive to most of the multidrug-resistant strains. However, widespread use of polymyxin is likely to lead to the emergence of polymyxin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. At the same time, the polymyxin hetero-resistance has made clinical prevention and treatment difficult. In addition to relying on the combination of polymyxins with other antibiotics, the search for new antibacterial drugs has also become a research hotspot. Research into early detection methods for polymyxin resistance can also help to optimize and improve the diagnosis and treatment strategies. This article reviewed the epidemic status, mechanism, detection methods and prevention measures of polymyxin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Gallium Nitrate Enhances Antimicrobial Activity of Colistin against Klebsiella pneumoniae by Inducing Reactive Oxygen Species Accumulation.

Klebsiella pneumoniae, a pathogen of critical clinical concern, urgently demands effective therapeutic options owing to its drug resistance. Polymyxins are increasingly regarded as a last-line therapeutic option for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections. However, polymyxin resistance in K. pneumoniae is an emerging issue. Here, we report that gallium nitrate (GaNt), an antimicrobial candidate, exhibits a potentiating effect on colistin against MDR K. pneumoniae clinical isolates. To further confirm this, we investigated the efficacy of combined GaNt and colistin in vitro using spot dilution and rapid time-kill assays and growth curve inhibition tests and in vivo using a murine lung infection model. The results showed that GaNt significantly increased the antimicrobial activity of colistin, especially in the iron-limiting media. Mechanistic studies demonstrated that bacterial antioxidant activity was repressed by GaNt, as revealed by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), leading to intracellular accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in K. pneumoniae, which was enhanced in the presence of colistin. Therefore, oxidative stress induced by GaNt and colistin augments the colistin-mediated killing of wild-type cells, which can be abolished by dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), an effective ROS scavenger. Collectively, our study indicates that GaNt has a notable impact on the antimicrobial activity of colistin against K. pneumoniae, revealing the potential of GaNt as a novel colistin adjuvant to improve the treatment outcomes of bacterial infections. IMPORTANCE This study aimed to determine the antimicrobial activity of GaNt combined with colistin against Klebsiella pneumoniae in vitro and in vivo. Our results suggest that by combining GaNt with colistin, antioxidant activity was suppressed and reactive oxygen species accumulation was induced in bacterial cells, enhancing antimicrobial activity against K. pneumoniae. We found that GaNt functioned as an antibiotic adjuvant when combined with colistin by inhibiting the growth of multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae. Our study provides insight into the use of an adjuvant to boost the antibiotic potential of colistin for treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae.

Rapid diagnostics and ceftazidime/avibactam for KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: impact on mortality and role of combination therapy.

This study was aimed at investigating risk factors for mortality in patients suffering from KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) bloodstream infections (BSIs), evaluating the impact of rapid diagnostics and ceftazidime/avibactam use. This observational retrospective study (January 2017-May 2021) included all patients with a KPC-Kp BSI. Uni-multivariable analyses were carried out to evaluate the effect of clinical variables on both in-hospital death (IHD) and 30-day all-cause mortality, and the role of the combination of ceftazidime/avibactam plus polymyxin. One hundred and ninety-six patients met the study's inclusion criteria. Older age, having undergone renal replacement therapy during the 30 days preceding the KPC-Kp BSI onset, having an INCREMENT-CPE score ≥ 8, and having suffered from a superimposed and/or following KPC-Kp BSI treatment candidemia were found to be the main factors associated with both mortality rates. Among protective factors, the centrality of ceftazidime/avibactam in monotherapy (IHD: OR: 0.34; CI 95%: 0.11-1.00-30-day all-cause mortality: OR: 0.18; CI 95%: 0.04-0.77) or combination (IHD: OR: 0.51; CI 95%: 0.22-1.19-30-day all-cause mortality: OR: 0.62; CI 95%: 0.21-1.84) emerged and became even more evident once the effect of ceftazidime/avibactam plus polymyxin was removed. Rapid diagnostics may be useful to adopt more effective strategies for the treatment of KPC-Kp BSI patients and implement infection control measures, even if not associated with higher patient survival. Ceftazidime/avibactam, even when used alone, represents an important option against KPC-Kp, while combined use with polymyxin might not have altered its efficacy. Patient comorbidities, severity of BSI, and complications such as candidemia were confirmed to have a significant burden on survival.

Antibiotic therapy does not alter mitochondrial bioenergetics in lymphocytes of patients with septic shock - A prospective cohort study.

Antibiotics may trigger alterations in mitochondrial function, which has been explored in cells culture, and in animal model of sepsis. This study sought to evaluate whether antibiotic therapy affects mitochondrial bioenergetics in a 68-patients clinical study. We studied mitochondrial respiratory rates at two time points: the first day of antibiotic administration and three days after. The Δbasal, ΔCI, ΔCII respiration, and ΔBCE respiratory rates were not different between patients administered with polymyxin, vancomycin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and azithromycin compared to those who were not administered. Specific beta-lactams are associated with specific modifications in mitochondrial respiratory endpoints - patients who used meropenem had higher delta C2 values compared to those who did not (p = 0.03). Patients who used piperacillin-tazobactam had lower delta C1 (p = 0.03) values than those who did not, but higher delta C2 values (p = 0.02). These mitochondrial metabolic signatures in isolated lymphocytes challenges the proposed effects of antibiotics in mitochondrial bioenergetics of cell cultures, but at current status have an uncertain clinical significance.

Effect of 4-Hexylresorcinol on the Efficiency of Antibiotic Treatment of Experimental Sepsis Caused by Antibiotic-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strain in Mice.

High efficiency of a combined preparation including synergistic polymyxin B and 4-hexylresorcinol was shown for treatment of experimental sepsis caused by an antibiotic-resistant highly virulent hypermucoid Klebsiella pneumoniae strain KPM9Pmr in mice. Complex therapy with polymyxin B (1 mg/kg) and 4-hexylresorcinol (30 mg/kg) led to cure in 80%; in 20% of these mice, no bacterial cells were found. After treatment with polymyxin B alone, only 50% animals survived and all of them contained bacterial cells. Comparative analysis of the results of monotherapy and combined treatment indicates that 4-hexylresorcinol not only increases the efficiency of antibiotic, but also minimizes persistence of the infection agent and therefore, the risk of development of antibiotic resistance.

Is it time to move away from polymyxins?: evidence and alternatives.

Increasing burden of carbapenem resistance and resultant difficult-to-treat infections are of particular concern due to the lack of effective and safe treatment options. More recently, several new agents with activity against certain multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensive drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative pathogens have been approved for clinical use. These include ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, plazomicin, and cefiderocol. For the management of MBL infections, clinically used triple combination comprising ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam is hindered due to non-availability of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods and lack of information on potential drug-drug interaction leading to PK changes impacting its safety and efficacy. Moreover, in several countries including Indian subcontinent and developing countries, these new agents are yet to be made available. Under these circumstances, polymyxins are the only last resort for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant infections. With the recent evidence of suboptimal PK/PD particularly in lung environment, limited efficacy and increased nephrotoxicity associated with polymyxin use, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has revised both colistin and polymyxin B breakpoints. Thus, polymyxins 'intermediate' breakpoint for Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp. are now set at ≤ 2 mg/L, implying limited clinical efficacy even for isolates with the MIC value 2 mg/L. This change has questioned the dependency on polymyxins in treating XDR infections. In this context, recently approved cefiderocol and phase 3 stage combination drug cefepime-zidebactam assume greater significance due to their potential to act as polymyxin-supplanting therapies.

The role of new antimicrobials for Gram-negative infections in daily clinical practice.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss a possible clinical reasoning for treating resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) infections in daily clinical practice, as well as developing a research agenda for the field. RECENT FINDINGS: Novel agents, both belonging to ß-lactams and to other classes of antimicrobials, have recently become available, likely replacing polymyxins or polymyxin-based combination regimens as the preferred choices for the first-line treatment of severe resistant GNB infections in the near future. SUMMARY: The peculiar characteristics of novel agents for severe resistant GNB infections have abruptly made the structure of previous therapeutic algorithms somewhat obsolete, in view of the differential activity of most of them against different classes of carbapenemases. Furthermore, other agents showing activity against resistant GNB are in late phase of clinical development. Optimizing the use of novel agents in order both to guarantee the best available treatment to patients and to delay the emergence and spread of resistance is an important task that cannot be postponed, especially considering the unavailability of well tolerated and fully efficacious options for treating resistant GNB infections that we faced in the last 15 years.

Evaluation of rapid polymyxin Nordmann Poirel test for detection of polymyxin resistance in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae.

Polymyxins play a significant role against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). A total of 121 clinical samples yielded growth of CRE that were included in the study. Rapid Polymyxin NP test was performed on all the isolates as described by Nordmann P et al. and results were compared with broth microdilution method. Majority of the isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae (70.2%) followed by Escherichia coli (17.4%). A total of 71 isolates were found resistant and 50 as susceptible by broth microdilution. Sensitivity and specificity of rapid polymyxin NP test were found to be 97.2% and 100%, respectively. Our study concluded that rapid polymyxin NP test is reliable and can be used as an alternative to broth microdilution in resource limited settings.

Polymyxin for the treatment of intracranial infections of extensively drug-resistant bacteria in children after neurosurgical operation.

BACKGROUND: Increased meningitis caused by extensively drug-resistant bacillary presents a significant challenge in antibiotic selection. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of polymyxin in the treatment of post-neurosurgical meningitis due to the extensively drug-resistant bacillary in children. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on post-neurosurgical meningitis caused by the extensively drug-resistant bacillary in children, who were treated with polymyxin for ≥ 3 days. RESULTS: Among five post-neurosurgical meningitis cases that were included, the children were infected by Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 3), Klebsiella pneumonia (n = 1), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1). The drug susceptibility test showed that they were extensively drug-resistant bacillary. Two patients received intravenous polymyxin E. Three children received intravenous combined with intraventricular injection of polymyxin B. One patient infected by Klebsiella pneumonia eventually died of septic shock. No serious adverse effects of polymyxin were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Polymyxin is a safe and effective therapy for post-neurosurgical, multidrug-resistant bacillary meningitis in children.

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam vs Polymyxin or Aminoglycoside-based Regimens for the Treatment of Drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

BACKGROUND: Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a novel cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination that often retains activity against resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The comparative safety and efficacy vs polymyxins or aminoglycosides in this setting remains unknown. METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter, observational cohort study was performed. Patients who received ceftolozane/tazobactam were compared with those treated with either polymyxin or aminoglycoside-based regimens for infections due to drug-resistant P. aeruginosa. Multivariate logistic regression was performed controlling for factors associated with treatment to assess the independent impact of ceftolozane/tazobactam on clinical cure, acute kidney injury (AKI), and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included (100 in each treatment arm). The cohort represented an ill population with 69% in the intensive care unit, 63% mechanically ventilated, and 42% in severe sepsis or septic shock at infection onset. The most common infection type was ventilator-associated pneumonia (52%); 7% of patients were bacteremic. Combination therapy was more commonly used in polymyxin/aminoglycoside patients than those who received ceftolozane/tazobactam (72% vs 15%, P < .001). After adjusting for differences between groups, receipt of ceftolozane/tazobactam was independently associated with clinical cure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-5.30) and protective against AKI (aOR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.22). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality. The number needed to treat for a clinical cure with ceftolozane/tazobactam was 5, and the number needed to harm with AKI with a polymyxin/aminoglycoside was 4. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the preferential use of ceftolozane/tazobactam over polymyxins or aminoglycosides for drug-resistant P. aeruginosa infections.

[The efficacy and safety of different antimicrobial regimens in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections].

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different antimicrobial regimens in patients with bloodstream infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP). Methods: The clinical date of patients with CRKP bloodstream infections were retrospectively analyzed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University Medical College between January 2017 and January 2018. All subjects were separated into three groups based on antibiotics regimens over 72 hours, including meropenem 2.0 g every 8 hours, tigecycline 200 mg as initial dose and 100 mg every 12 hours, and polymyxin B 1.25 mg/kg every 12 hours as salvage treatment of tigecycline. Results: A total of 86 patients were finally recruited, including 14, 52 and 20 patients in groups of meropenem, tigecycline and polymyxin B salvage, respectively. All of the strains were resistant to meropenem and susceptible to tigecycline and polymyxin B initially, while 2 of them became resistant to tigecycline during treatment. The 28-day mortality was significantly higher in meropenem group (13/14) than that in tigecycline group and polymyxin B salvage group (61.5%, 32/52) and (12/20), respectively (P<0.01), while as no significant difference was seen in the last two groups (χ(2)=0.014, P>0.05). The incidences of hepatic impairment [3.8%(2/52) vs. 1/20] and renal dysfunction (0 vs. 1/20) between tigecycline group and polymyxin B salvage group were both comparable (P>0.05). Conclusion: The meropenem-based therapy is not recommended for CRKP-related bloodstream infections. Tigecycline-based therapy is still disappointing despite salvage use of polymyxin B after 72 hours. Hepatic and nephretic toxicities caused by additional polymyxin B are acceptable.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam as Salvage Therapy for Infections Caused by Enterobacteriales Coresistant to Carbapenems and Polymyxins.

In this article, we report a case series of patients with infections caused by Enterobacteriales coresistant to carbapenems and polymyxins who were treated with ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) salvage therapy on a compassionate-use protocol. We enrolled 29 adult patients in 3 centers that had an infection due to a resistant microorganism and for whom the treatments available were considered ineffective, treated them with CAZ-AVI, and assessed clinical and microbiological cure at the end of treatment and all-cause mortality at 14 days and 30 days. The antimicrobial susceptibility profile was determined using broth microdilution, and total genomic DNA was sequenced. Twelve (41.4%) patients had bacteremia, and 48.3% (14/29) of the infections were treated with combination therapy. All strains were producers of KPC-2 and were susceptible to CAZ-AVI (MIC90, 1 µg/ml). Clinical success was high (24/29 [82.7%; 95% confidence interval, 64.2 to 94.2%]), even for the bacteremic cases (75%). The 14-day and 30-day mortality rates were 9/29 (31%) and 15/29 (51.7%), respectively. The 14-day mortality rate for pneumonia was the same as that for bloodstream infections (33.3%) and although not significant, we found that patients with renal impairment that received adjusted doses of CAZ-AVI had high mortality (4/9 [44%]; P = 0.22). We concluded that CAZ-AVI is an option for the treatment of severe infections due to difficult-to-treat drug-resistant Enterobacteriales.

A Proof-of-Concept Study of the Efficacy of Systemically Administered Polymyxins in Mouse Burn Wound Infection Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens.

The efficacy of subcutaneously administered polymyxins against burn wound infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae was examined in a murine infection model. Subcutaneously administered colistin and polymyxin B (30 mg/kg thrice daily) achieved a ≥2-log10 reduction in the bacterial load for P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii infections, whereas wound infections by K. pneumoniae were less responsive (<1-log10 reduction). This study highlights the potential therapeutic benefits of parenteral polymyxins for treating burn wound infections.

Triple combination antibiotic therapy for carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The spread of carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (CPKP) has become a significant problem worldwide. Combination therapy for CPKP is encouraging, but polymyxin resistance to many antibiotics is hampering effective treatment. Combination therapy with three or more antibiotics is being increasingly reported, therefore we performed a systematic review of triple combination cases in an effort to evaluate their clinical effectiveness for CPKP infections. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched to identify all published clinical outcomes of CPKP infections treated with triple combination therapy. Articles were stratified into two tiers depending on the level of clinical detail provided. A tier 1 study included: antibiotic regimen, regimen-specific outcome, patient status at onset of infection, and source of infection. Articles not reaching these criteria were considered tier 2. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies were eligible, 23 tier 1 and ten tier 2. Among tier 1 studies, 53 cases were included in this analysis. The most common infection was pneumonia (31%) followed by primary or catheter-related bacteremia (21%) and urinary tract infection (17%). Different combinations of antibiotic classes were utilized in triple combinations, the most common being a polymyxin (colistin or polymyxin B, 86.8%), tigecycline (73.6%), aminoglycoside (43.4%), or carbapenem (43.4%). Clinical and microbiological failure occurred in 14/39 patients (35.9%) and 22/42 patients (52.4%), respectively. Overall mortality for patients treated with triple combination therapy was 35.8% (19/53 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Triple combination therapy is being considered as a treatment option for CPKP. Polymyxin-based therapy is the backbone antibiotic in these regimens, but its effectiveness needs establishing in prospective clinical trials.

Old antibiotics for multidrug-resistant pathogens: from in vitro activity to clinical outcomes.

Antimicrobial resistance is a major and emerging threat worldwide. New antimicrobials have been unable to meet the resistance challenge, and treatment options are limited for a growing number of resistant pathogens. More and more clinicians are relying on older antimicrobials for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Some older antimicrobials have maintained excellent in vitro activity against highly resistant pathogens. In some instances, use of older agents is limited by unfavourable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics and/or toxicities. In general, clinical data pertaining to the use of older agents for the treatment of MDR pathogens are scarce. Research efforts should be focused on the evaluation of older agents for the treatment of MDR pathogens as well as evaluating how these agents perform in complex patient populations with various and multiple co-morbid conditions.

Clinical translation of polymyxin-based combination therapy: Facts, challenges and future opportunities.

The emergence and spread of multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria has led to a resurgence in the clinical use of polymyxin antibiotics. However, the prevalence of polymyxin resistance is on the rise at an alarming rate, motivating the idea of combination therapy to sustain the revival of these "old" antibiotics. Although ample evidence in favor of combination therapy has emerged, it seems impracticable and confusing to find a promising combination from the diverse reports or gain adequate information on the efficacy and safety profile. With a stagnating discovery pipeline of novel antimicrobials, there is a clear need to fill the knowledge gaps in translating these basic research data to beneficial clinical practice. In this review, we examined the factors and ambiguities that stand as major hurdles in bringing polymyxin combination therapy to bedside care, highlighting the importance and urgency of incorporating translational research insights into areas of difficulty. We also discussed future research priorities that are essential to gather the necessary evidence and insights for promoting the best possible use of polymyxins in combination therapy.

Rifaximin combined with polymyxins: A potential regimen for selective decontamination of multidrug-resistant bacteria in the digestive tract?

Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) using combinations of oral non-absorbable antibiotics has been proposed as a means of preventing multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of rifaximin (RIFAX) were determined against 262 Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial isolates by broth microtitre assay. Rifampicin (RIF) was used as a comparator in the analysis. Synergistic interactions between RIFAX and polymyxin B (PMB) were assessed by using the chequerboard method and calculating the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI). The antimicrobial activities of both RIFAX and RIF were similar with little variation in the overall MIC distributions for Gram-negative non-fermenters and Gram-positive bacteria. However, against Enterobacteriaceae higher MICs (>16mg/L) were observed for RIFAX than for RIF (50% vs 27%). Amongst the 262 isolates tested, 100 could be considered resistant to RIFAX. Overall, the combination of RIFAX and PMB was more active against all of the isolates tested compared with either drug alone, with reductions of 2-11 doubling dilutions in individual MICs. Potent synergy was observed with the RIFAX+PMB combination using FICI criteria (FICI range 0.02-0.5). The data presented here suggest that combination therapy may be significantly more effective against isolates with RIFAX and/or PMB resistance and could be considered as part of a SDD regimen aimed at reducing enteric carriage of MDR pathogens in colonised and infected patients.

Clinical Efficacy of Polymyxin Monotherapy versus Nonvalidated Polymyxin Combination Therapy versus Validated Polymyxin Combination Therapy in Extensively Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacillus Infections.

Polymyxins have emerged as a last-resort treatment of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative Bacillus (GNB) infections, which present a growing threat. Individualized polymyxin-based antibiotic combinations selected on the basis of the results of in vitro combination testing may be required to optimize therapy. A retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients receiving polymyxins for XDR GNB infections from 2009 to 2014 was conducted to compare the treatment outcomes between patients receiving polymyxin monotherapy (MT), nonvalidated polymyxin combination therapy (NVCT), and in vitro combination testing-validated polymyxin combination therapy (VCT). The primary and secondary outcomes were infection-related mortality and microbiological eradication, respectively. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) between treatment groups were assessed. A total of 291 patients (patients receiving MT, n = 58; patients receiving NVCT, n = 203; patients receiving VCT, n = 30) were included. The overall infection-related mortality rate was 23.0% (67 patients). In the multivariable analysis, treatment of XDR GNB infections with MT (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 8.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56 to 46.05) and NVCT (aOR, 5.75; 95% CI, 1.25 to 25.73) was associated with an increased risk of infection-related mortality compared to that with treatment with VCT. A higher Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score (aOR, 1.14; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.21) and a higher Charlson comorbidity index (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.47) were also independently associated with an increased risk of infection-related mortality. No increase in the incidence of ADRs was observed in the VCT group. The use of an individualized antibiotic combination which was selected on the basis of the results of in vitro combination testing was associated with significantly lower rates of infection-related mortality in patients with XDR GNB infections. Future prospective randomized studies will be required to validate these findings.