Nerves in the Areas Posterior to the Prostate Base Contribute to Erectile Function: An Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm the distribution of functional nerves involved in erectile function at the posterior of the prostate base, intraoperative nerve stimulation was performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) METHODS: Several points at the posterior of the prostate and the posterolateral typical neurovascular bundle (NVB) were electrically stimulated at the level of the prostate base during RARP in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. The prostate pedicle (PP), medial side of the PP (MPP), Denonvilliers' fascia (DF), and typical NVB were stimulated using bipolar electrodes. The changes in pressure at the middle of the urethra were measured using an inserted balloon-catheter to detect the increase in cavernosal pressure. RESULTS: Although the study included only 12 patients, each stimulation of the PP, MPP, and NVB induced evident urethral pressure responses in all patients. The median amplitude of the pressure responses was 5.49 (IQR 3.11-8.42), 6.00 (IQR 3.70-8.30), and 3.22 (IQR 2.48-7.19) cm H2O at the PP, MPP, and NVB, respectively. The amplitude of responses at the PP and MPP was not small compared with the responses at the typical NVB. Stimulations at the DF induced unstable weak urethral response alone or no response in all patients. CONCLUSION: We showed that electrostimulation of the PP and MPP increases the cavernosal pressure similar to the typical NVB stimulation. These findings indicate that maximal preservation of the tissues at the posterior area of the prostate base can contribute to optimal recovery of postoperative erectile function after nerve-sparing RARP.

Local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: A meta-analysis.

A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of local anesthesia in alleviating pain during prostate biopsy. We searched relevant articles in PubMed and Embase. The included studies should be randomized controlled trials (RCT) using local anesthesia to alleviate pain during biopsy, which was recorded by a pain scale. Analgesic efficacy of different local anesthesia techniques were analyzed, including intrarectal local anesthesia (IRLA), periprostatic nerve block (PNB), pelvic plexus block (PPB) and intraprostatic local anesthesia (IPLA). We included 46 RCTs. PNB significantly reduced pain score compared with placebo (-1.27 [95% confidence interval [95% CI] -1.72, -0.82]) or no injection (-1.01 [95% CI -1.2, -0.82]). IRLA with prilocaine-lidocaine cream could also reduced pain (-0.45 [95% CI -0.76, -0.15]), while the IRLA with lidocaine gel was not effective (-0.1 [95% CI -0.24, 0.04]). PNB lateral to the neurovascular bundle had better analgesic effect than at prostate apex (P = 0.02). Combination use of PPB and IRLA considerably alleviated pain of patients compared with the combination of PNB and IRLA (-1.32 [95% CI -1.59, -1.06]). In conclusion, local anesthesia could alleviate patients' pain during the prostate biopsy. PNB was not so effective as PPB.

Men with low preoperative sexual function may benefit from nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: We determined the effect of nerve sparing radical prostatectomy on sexual and urinary function in men at various levels of pretreatment sexual function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men in the CaPSURE™ (Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor) database who underwent radical prostatectomy and had baseline and 2-year posttreatment UCLA-PCI sexual function and urinary function scores were selected. Nerve sparing was categorized as bilateral, unilateral or none and the level of pretreatment sexual function was divided into quartiles. The cohort was divided into subgroups of nerve sparing technique and pretreatment sexual function. Differences between sexual function and urinary function among subgroups were determined. A test of interaction was performed between preoperative sexual function and degree of nerve sparing on postoperative sexual function and urinary function scores. RESULTS: A total of 1,322 patients met the study inclusion criteria. Median patient age was 61 years (range 41 to 79). Bilateral, unilateral and no nerve sparing procedures were performed in 899, 200 and 223 men, respectively. The effects of nerve sparing on sexual function differed among the quartiles of preoperative sexual function (p <0.01). Nerve sparing did not have an effect on the sexual function of men in the lowest quartile of preoperative sexual function score (p = 0.15) but did have a significant beneficial effect on sexual function in the higher 3 quartiles (p = 0.04, p <0.01 and p <0.01, respectively). Alternatively, nerve sparing improved urinary function in men in the lowest quartile of baseline sexual function. CONCLUSIONS: Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy results in better sexual function outcomes than no nerve sparing in most men except those with little baseline function. Urinary function was positively impacted in all men. Men who are suitable candidates for nerve preservation may benefit from nerve sparing surgery. Poorer baseline sexual function should not exclude these men from such surgery.

Pelvic plexus block is more effective than periprostatic nerve block for pain control during office transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a single center, prospective, randomized, double arm study.

PURPOSE: We compared intrarectal local anesthesia plus pelvic plexus block vs intrarectal local anesthesia plus periprostatic nerve block during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 by a computer generated schedule into group 1-90 who received intrarectal local anesthesia (lidocaine 1.5%-nifedipine 0.3% cream) plus pelvic plexus block (2.5 ml lidocaine 1% plus naropine 0.75% injected on each side into the pelvic neurovascular plexus lateral to the seminal vesicle tip) and group 2-90 who received intrarectal local anesthesia plus periprostatic nerve block (2.5 ml of the same mixture injected on each side into the neurovascular bundles at the prostate-bladder-seminal vesicle angle) before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. After the procedure patients were instructed to rate the level of pain/discomfort from 0 to 10 on the visual analog scale at certain time points, including during the introduction and presence of the probe in the rectum, during pelvic plexus block or periprostatic nerve block, during biopsy and 30 minutes after biopsy. RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar in age, serum prostate specific antigen and total prostate volume. There was no difference in pain perception during probe introduction and pelvic plexus or periprostatic nerve block. Pain during prostate biopsy was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (p <0.001). The same trend was recorded for pain perception 30 minutes after biopsy (p = 0.001). There were no major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic plexus block under Doppler ultrasound guidance provides better analgesia than periprostatic nerve block during office based transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Nerve mapping for prostatectomies: novel technologies under development.

Prostatic neuroanatomy is difficult to visualize intraoperatively and can be extremely variable. Damage to these nerves during prostatectomies may lead to postoperative complications such as erectile dysfunction and incontinence. This review aims to discuss the prostatic neuroanatomy, sites of potential nerve damage during a prostatectomy, and nerve-mapping technologies being developed to prevent neural injury. These technologies include stimulation, dyes, and direct visualization. Nerve stimulation works by testing an area and observing a physiologic response but is limited by the long half-life for an erectile response; examples include CaverMap, ProPep, and optical nerve stimulation. Few nerve dyes have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) because of the extensive testing required; examples of nerve dyes include compounds from Avelas and General Electric, fluorescent cholera toxin subunit B, indocyanine green, fluorescent inactivated herpes simplex 2, and Fluoro-Gold. Direct visualization techniques have a simpler FDA approval process; examples include optical coherence tomography, multiphoton microscopy, ultrasound, coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering. Many researchers are developing several novel technologies that can be categorized as stimulation based, dye-based, or direct visualization. As of yet, none has shown clear evidence to improve surgical outcomes and consequently lack wide adoption. Further development of these technologies may lead to improved complication rates after prostatectomies. Clinically, some technologies have demonstrated utility in predicting the development of complications. By using that information, more aggressive rehabilitation programs may lead to improved long-term function. These technologies can also be applied for research to improve our knowledge of the neuroanatomy and physiology of erection and incontinence.

Continuous-wave laser stimulation of the rat prostate cavernous nerves using a compact and inexpensive all single mode optical fiber system.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Laser stimulation of the rat cavernous nerve (CN) recently has been demonstrated as an alternative to electrical stimulation for potential application in nerve mapping during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Advantages include noncontact stimulation and improved spatial selectivity. Previous studies, however, have used large and/or expensive laser sources for stimulation. This study demonstrates the feasibility of optical stimulation of the rat CN, in vivo, using a compact, inexpensive all-single-mode fiberoptic system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 1455-nm wavelength infrared diode laser beam was coupled into a 9-µm-core single-mode fiber for delivery through a 10F laparoscopic probe and used for laser stimulation of the CN in a total of eight rats, in vivo. RESULTS: Laser stimulation of the CN was observed at threshold temperatures of 41°C, with intracavernous pressure response times as short as 4 s, and magnitudes up to 50 mm Hg, compared with baselines of 10 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: This novel, all-single-mode-fiber laser nerve stimulation system introduces several advantages including: (1) lower cost laser; (2) more robust fiberoptic design, eliminating alignment and cleaning of bulk optical components; and (3) improved Gaussian spatial beam profile for simplified alignment of the laser beam with the nerve. With further development, laser nerve stimulation may be useful for identification and preservation of the CN during prostate cancer surgery.

Técnicas para la preservación de los haces neurovasculares durante la prostatectomía radical retropúbica / No disponible

A pesar de que la prostatectomía radical constituye un tratamiento con intención curativa que ha demostrado ser eficaz en muchos de nuestros pacientes con cáncer prostático, aún se asocia a una morbilidad importante, que incluye, entre sus exponentes más destacados, la disfunción eréctil postoperatoria. La potencia posterior a la intervención puede estar influenciada por muchos factores entre los que destacan la presencia de una función eréctil adecuada previa a la cirugía, la edad del paciente, el estadio de la enfermedad en el momento del tratamiento, la experiencia del cirujano y, por supuesto, las variaciones anatómicas interpersonales.Durante las últimas décadas, el conocimiento exacto de la neuroanatomía de la pelvis masculina ha adquirido una gran importancia, tanto para el estudioso de la anatomía humana como para el cirujano pélvico. Por eso, las técnicas anatómicas de preservación neurovascular han propiciado una disminución del número de complicaciones relacionadas con la lesión de estas estructuras. Este artículo presenta una breve descripción del sustrato neuroanatómico de los haces neurovasculares junto a una detallada compilación de las diferentes técnicas quirúrgicas descritas para su preservación durante la prostatectomía radical retropúbica(AU)

Although radical prostatectomy is a curative therapy that has proven effective in many of our patients with prostate cancer, it is still associated with significant morbidity, which includes postoperative erectile dysfunction among its leading exponents. Potency after the intervention may be influenced by many factors, among which, presence of adequate erectile function before surgery, patient’s age, stage of disease at the time of treatment, surgeon’s experience and, of course, interpersonal anatomical variations may be pointed out.In recent decades, the exact knowledge of the neuroanatomy of the male pelvis has become very important, for both the student of human anatomy and the pelvic surgeon. Therefore, the anatomical nerve sparing techniques have led to fewer complications related to the injury of these structures. This article presents a brief description of the neuroanatomical substrate of the neurovascular bundles along with a detailed compilation of the different surgical techniques for their preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy(AU)

Surgical anatomy of the prostate in the era of radical robotic prostatectomy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: New insights in the anatomy of the prostate and the surrounding tissue evolve the technique of radical prostatectomy for the treatment of prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Regarding the course of the erectile nerves along the prostate, recent studies confirmed the presence of parasympathetic pro-erectile nerve fibers at the anterolateral aspect of the prostate. Another study of intraoperative electrostimulation of those nerves confirmed an increase in intracavernosal pressure by stimulations between the 1 and 3 o'clock position. Therefore, it is very likely that these anterior nerve fibers have an effect on erectile function. Regarding the urethral sphincter in the male, a study showed no attachment of the external sphincter to the levator ani muscle, probably resulting in an absence of a levator ani support to the continence mechanism. The male urinary sphincter seems to be in isolation responsible for urinary continence. SUMMARY: The nerve fibers at the anterolateral aspect of the prostate seem to participate in erectile function, which renders the concept of a high anterior release during nerve sparing beneficial. The isolated urinary sphincter mechanism results in the need to conserve as much urethral length as possible during radical prostatectomy to avoid urinary incontinence.

Nerves at the ventral prostatic capsule contribute to erectile function: initial electrophysiological assessment in humans.

BACKGROUND: Recent microanatomical studies have identified a significant amount of nerve fibers along the ventral circumference of the prostate capsule and confirmed the concept of a periprostatic nerve network. However, functional investigations have not yet proved whether nerve fibers distributed on the prostate capsule, particularly those outside the neurovascular bundle (NVB), contribute to erection. OBJECTIVE: To confirm whether nerve fibers distributed on the prostate capsule contribute to erectile function, the present study was performed using electrophysiologic testing. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The circumference of the prostate capsule was electrically stimulated during radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) in 12 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). We defined the ventromedian circumference of the prostate capsule as the 12 o'clock position and the posterolateral position of the typical NVB as the 5 o'clock position. Periprostatic nerve fibers at the 12, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 o'clock positions of the midprostate were stimulated using bipolar electrodes. MEASUREMENTS: Changes in pressure at the middle of the urethra were measured using an inserted balloon catheter to detect increases in cavernosal pressure. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Although the study included only 12 patients, every stimulation at all positions between 1 and 5 o'clock evoked urethral pressure responses in all patients. Mean pressure response was most powerful for 5 o'clock stimulation and decreased with stimulated points further from the 5 o'clock position. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that electrostimulation at not only the posterolateral but also the anterior and lateral circumference of the prostate capsule can increase cavernosal pressure. These findings indicate that the periprostatic nerve network contributes to erections.

Periprostatic nerve blockage reduces postoperative analgesic consumption and pain scores of patients undergoing transurethral prostate resection.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the effects of periprostatic bupivacaine administration on pain control and analgesic consumption after transurethral prostate resection (TURP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 40 male patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent TURP, and they were divided randomly into two groups. All patients were operated under general anesthesia. The study group patients (n = 20) received periprostatic bupivacaine (0.5% 20 ml) injection (group I), and the control patients (n = 20) received only saline (NaCl 0.9% 20 ml) injection (group II). All injections were performed bilaterally into the periprostatic areas immediately after the TURP procedure via the transperineal route. In the postoperative period, all patients (groups I and II) received tramadol using a patient-controlled analgesia device. Postoperative pain was assessed and recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) at postoperative hours 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 48. Total tramadol consumptions and additional analgesic requirements were also recorded and compared between groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in demographic data between the two groups (p > 0.05). VAS scores of the patients at hours 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 12 were found to be significantly lower in group I than in group II (p < 0.05). Total tramadol consumption and patient-controlled analgesia demands of groups I and II were 153.5 +/- 52.4 vs. 465.0 +/- 55.1 mg and 17.1 +/- 7.7 vs. 77.8 +/- 7.5 mg, respectively (p < 0.001). No side effect was observed regarding bupivacaine injections. CONCLUSIONS: Periprostatic bupivacaine administration was a useful and safe method for postoperative pain control and reduced analgesic consumption in patients undergoing TURP.

Preventing pain during office biopsy of the prostate: a single center, prospective, double-blind, 3-arm, parallel group, randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: A prospective, double-blind, 3-arm, parallel group, randomized clinical trial was performed to compare 3 anesthetic techniques for preventing pain during prostate biopsy. METHODS: A total of 243 men undergoing a 12-core prostate biopsy were randomized to 1 of 3 anesthetic methods: 1) seminal vesical-prostatic base blockade, 2) intraprostatic blockade, and 3) apical-rectal blockade. Pain was estimated with the 10-point visual analog scale. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated factors predictive of pain. The Kruskal-Wallis test analyzed overall group comparisons and the Steel-Dwass test assessed between-group comparisons in pain scores. Proportional odds ordinal logistic regression quantified the ability of covariates and treatment arms to predict biopsy pain. These values are presented as odds ratios with confidence intervals (OR, 95% CI). RESULTS: From November 2005 to June 2006, 81 men were randomized to 3 study arms. Lidocaine administration was the most painful element of the procedure, while probe insertion was the least. Apical biopsies were routinely more painful than mid-gland biopsies, which were more painful than base biopsies. The apical-rectal blockade was the most painful to administer, but has lasting effects and led to better pain control than the prostatic base-seminal vesicle blockade. Similarly, the intraprostatic blockade was more effective than the prostatic base-seminal vesicle blockade. Besides pain reported at the time of anesthetic injection, no difference was identified between the intraprostatic and apical-rectal blockades. CONCLUSIONS: Mid and apical biopsies of the prostate are more painful than base biopsies. The seminal vesicle-prostatic base blockade is less effective than intraprostatic and apical-rectal blockade at controlling pain.

Perineural invasion affects biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients with prostate cancer treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prognostic effect of perineural invasion (PNI) for patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS: We evaluated 657 consecutive patients who had undergone external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. The clinical/treatment parameters used for analysis included PNI, clinical stage, biopsy Gleason score, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, radiation dose, and androgen deprivation. The primary endpoint was biochemical recurrence defined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-American Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology Phoenix consensus; the secondary endpoint was prostate cancer death. RESULTS: Of 586 men with a minimum of 24 months of follow-up, 112 (19.1%) had PNI present in the biopsy specimen. When patients were stratified into risk groups using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria, PNI was more prevalent in patients within higher risk groups (6.8% in low-risk versus 18.3% in intermediate-risk versus 30.1% in high-risk groups; P <0.001). The presence of PNI was associated with lower biochemical recurrence-free (P = 0.003) and cancer-specific (P = 0.040) survival rates by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox regression analysis showed that PNI was a statistically significant prognostic factor of biochemical recurrence on both univariate (hazard ratio [HR] 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19 to 2.46, P = 0.004) and multivariate (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.32, P = 0.025) analyses. Regression analysis after stratification by risk group and adjustment for treatment covariates demonstrated a significant association between PNI and the risk of biochemical recurrence for low-risk (HR 4.14, 95% CI 1.55 to 11.02, P = 0.005) and intermediate/high-risk patients (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.29, P = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that the presence of PNI is an independent risk factor associated with an increased risk of biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer undergoing external beam radiotherapy.

Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: We investigated the impact of nerve sparing technique on erectile function, urinary continence and health related quality of life after radical perineal prostatectomy using a validated self-assessment questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire was administered preoperatively and at defined intervals after surgery to 265 patients who underwent radical perineal prostatectomy at 2 institutions between January 2001 and December 2004. Of these patients 153 (57.7%) and 112 (42.3%) underwent nonnerve sparing and nerve sparing approaches, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine time to recovery of erectile function (erections firm enough for intercourse) and urinary continence (0 pads per day). RESULTS: Median patient age was 60.6 years. Median followup was 15 months. In multivariate analysis preoperative erectile function (p = 0.005) and preservation of the neurovascular bundle (p = 0.018) were independent predictors of earlier recovery of erectile function, with hazard ratios of 2.3 (95% CI 1.2-4.6) and 4.0 (95% CI 1.5-10.3), respectively. Median time to recovery of urinary continence was 4.8 months in the nerve sparing group and 6.1 months in the nonnerve sparing group (p = 0.001). In multivariate analysis nerve sparing technique (p = 0.001, HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.9) and age (p = 0.012, HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.2) were independent predictors of recovery of continence. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that nerve sparing radical perineal prostatectomy is associated with improved recovery of urinary continence and favorable health related quality of life scores and, therefore, should be considered a viable alternative to other nerve sparing approaches.

Perineural invasion in prostatic carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy: the role of TR systematic biopsy.

Perineural invasion (PNI) is a morphological entity which has been known for many years, though its significance in prostatic neoplasms has only been studied recently. Therefore, we tried to assess, with the help our experience, its presence and its significance. Ninety-four patients, aged between 49 and 74 (average 65.8)--with a PSA between 2.69 and 52 ng/ml (average 11.44)--underwent RP for prostatic carcinoma; 58 patients had stage T2 and 36 had T3. 48 patients had Gleason 7 or higher, and 46 had G 6 or lower. Fifty patients (53,1%) were PNI+ and 44 (46,9%) PNI-. Between the two groups there was no significant difference as to age (1" group: average age 67 years; 2nd group: 68) and PSA (1st group: average 9.73 ng/ml, 2nd group: average 8,17) (Z 0,639). The distribution according to the stage showed that 24 patients (48%) PNI+ were T2 and 26 (52%) PNI+ T3, 34 (77.2%) PNI- T2 and 10 (22%) PNI- T3 and therefore 72,23% of the T3's were PNI+ and 41.3% of the T2's were PNI+; 34 patients (70.8%) with G>7 were PNI+ and 14 (29.16%) PNI-, 16 patients (34,78%) with G<6 were PNI+ and 30 (65.2%) PNI-. Among the PNI+ 50 patients, 36 had undergone biopsy in our hospital, and therefore we re-examined the operation tissue and found out that 16 (44%) were biopsy PNI+ while for 22 (55.5%) it was not possible to assess the PNI on the biopsy tissue. PNI is an important morphological element in the staging of prostatic cancer and is connected with the disease negative prognostic factors: in fact, it can be traced with a high frequency in stage diseases and higher Gleasons. It does not seem to be connected with PSA, above all for values between 4 and 20 ng/ml. We think that a very important element to be stressed is the fact that this condition is not always detected with biopsy (about 45%) and this does not allow, in such cases, an adequate therapy plan. Also our experience seems to confirm that, therefore, in spite of the above said limits, it is advisable to search PNI both with biopsy--in order to have a further prognostic element and therefore arrange the most suitable therapy plan--and on the surgery piece, in order to better determine the biological nature of the disease and to be able to suggest adequate integrative therapies.

Significance of electrostimulation in detecting neurovascular bundle during radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The reported rate of erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing prostatectomy varies according to physicians. Because exact preservation of the neurovascular bundle (NVB) solely depends on the judgment of the physician, he or she should try to correctly identify the NVB and also avoid neurophysiologic injury of the NVB during the procedure. The purpose of the present study is to assess the status of the NVB preservation by physician's judgment at the operation, the changes in intracavernous pressure related to intraoperative electrical stimulation and postoperative histopathological examination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients who underwent nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy judged by intraoperative electrical stimulation of the NVB were included in this study. Bilateral, unilateral and non-nerve-sparing procedures were performed in 18, 17, and 3 cases, respectively. The NVB preservation evaluated by intraoperative physician's judgment was compared to that evaluated by postoperative histopathological examination. Furthermore, the NVB preservation evaluated by intraoperative electrical stimulation was compared to that by physician's judgment and postoperative histopathological examination. RESULTS: For 68 of 76 NVB (89.5%), intraoperative subjective judgment and histopathological assessment were identical. For 66 of 76 NVB (86.8%), electrical stimulation findings and the physician's judgments were identical, and for 70 of 76 NVB (92.1%), electrical stimulation findings and histopathological findings were identical. CONCLUSION: Even if physicians are convinced of a successful nerve-sparing procedure, there are some cases in which the NVB is not preserved accurately or neurophysiological damage is suffered. Therefore, intraoperative electrical stimulation of the NVB as well as the cavernosal nerve is very useful in evaluation of NVB preservation.

Local anesthesia for transurethral manipulations: is a transrectal periprostatic nerve block effective?

Periprostatic nerve block has been reported to be an effective form of anesthesia for prostatic surgery. Recent studies have shown the simplicity and the efficacy of a transrectal approach for periprostatic nerve block. The goal of our study was to evaluate the effect of a transrectal periprostatic nerve block on the discomfort associated with rigid cystoscopy. A total of 73 patients underwent cystoscopy. Group 1 (n = 39) received a transrectal periprostatic lidocaine infiltration prior to the cystoscopy. Group 2 (n = 34) underwent cystoscopy alone. The pain that patients experienced during cystoscopy was assessed on a visual analog scale. The patients in the two groups were very similar in regard to age and size of the prostate. The mean pain score was 3.4 in group 1 and 3.9 in group 2. This difference was not statistically significant. We conclude that nerve block does not seem to reduce the pain associated with transurethral manipulations.

[Utility of local anesthesia of the periprostatic plexus in the control of the pain in the ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy]. / Utilidad de la anestesia local del plexo periprostático en el control del dolor en las biopsias prostáticas guiadas con ecografía.

OBJECTIVE: Periprostatic plexus anesthesia (PPA) is not current practice during prostate ultrasound-guided biopsy (PB). Many patients must undergo a second or more PB if a prostate carcinoma is suspected. Due to pain, many patients reject the procedure, or it has to be performed with general anesthesia. Our objective was to evaluate the utility of PPA to eliminate the pain caused by PB, as well as the acceptance of the procedure under these conditions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between october 2002 and june 2003 we designed a randomized prospective study with 275 patients that were seen in 2 different hospitals and required PB. In the 1st group we included 101 males who underwent PB without PA. In the other group, 174 male patients submitted PB after PPA were included. 10 cc lidocaine, 2% diluted 50% was injected with a 22g needle. At the end of the procedure, patients were asked to fill in a questionnaire about their satisfaction and degree of pain felt. RESULTS: In the second group of patients we obtained significantly inferior values (p < 0.005, IC 95%) in the quantitative evaluation of pain compared with the first group (1.24 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.5 +/- 1.1). Ask per the possibility of repeating PB if it were necessary, none of the patients in the 2nd group would object, whereas 10% in the 1st group would not have the biopsy repeated or would only accept it if it was done with general anesthesia. No complications due to PPA were found. CONCLUSION: PPA is a safe procedure that significantly reduces pain during PB, improving its acquiescence among patients.

Comparison of local anesthesia techniques during transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of periprostatic nerve blockade versus intrarectal lidocaine during transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies. METHODS: A prospective randomized study was performed on 150 men requiring biopsy of the prostate. Patients were assigned to three groups: group 1 received no anesthetic, group 2 received 10 mL of 2% lidocaine gel intrarectally, and group 3 received a periprostatic injection of 5 mL of 1% lidocaine solution before undergoing prostate biopsy. Patients were asked to respond to a preprocedural and postprocedural questionnaire that consisted of four questions designed to evaluate pain perception and pain experienced, respectively, during the entire procedure. RESULTS: The mean pain scores, comparing responses from groups 2 (topical lidocaine) and 3 (periprostatic) individually with those from group 1 (control), were not statistically different for any of the preprocedural questions. The postprocedural pain scores were significantly lower in groups 2 and 3 compared with those from group 1 (control) for overall procedure impression (3.1 +/- 1.7 and 2.6 +/- 1.8 versus 3.8 +/- 1.8, respectively; P <0.05 for both). The postprocedural scores for probe insertion were significantly lower for the topical group than for the control group (2.2 +/- 1.7 versus 3.7 +/- 2.1, P <0.05) but not for the periprostatic group compared with the control group (3.0 +/- 1.9, P = 0.14). The biopsy postprocedural scores were significantly lower for the periprostatic group than for the control group (2.8 +/- 1.9 versus 4.3 +/- 1.7, P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that both techniques of local anesthesia are effective in reducing patient discomfort; however, periprostatic nerve blockade using injectable lidocaine appears to be more specific in reducing pain during the biopsy portion of the procedure.

Prostate innervation and local anesthesia in prostate procedures.

The nerve supply of the human prostate is very abundant, and knowledge of the anatomy contributes to successful administration of local anesthesia. However, the exact anatomy of extrinsic neuronal cell bodies of the autonomic and sensory innervation of the prostate is not clear, except in other animals. Branches of pelvic ganglia composed of pelvic (parasympathetic) and hypogastric (sympathetic) nerves innervate the prostate. The autonomic nervous system plays an important role in the growth, maturation, and secretory function of this gland. Prostate procedures under local anesthesia, such as transurethral prostatic resections or transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy, are safe, simple, and effective. Local anesthesia can be feasible for many special conditions including uncomplicated prostate surgery and may be particularly useful for the high-risk group of patients for whom inhalation or spinal anesthesia is inadvisable.