Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Physiol Biochem ; 74(1): 101-110, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28677073

RESUMEN

Nowadays, the strong relationship between diet and health is well known. Although the primary role of diet is to provide nutrients to fulfill metabolic requirements, the use of foods to improve health and the state of well-being is an idea increasingly accepted by society in the last three decades. During the last years, an important number of scientific advances have been achieved in this field and, although in some situations, it is difficult to establish a distinction between "harmful" and "good" bacteria, experts agree in classifying the genera Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus as beneficial bacteria. Thus, several strategies can be used to stimulate the proliferation of these beneficial intestinal bacteria, being one of them the consumption of prebiotics. The development of new prebiotics, with added functionality, is one of the most serious challenges shared not only by the scientific community but also by the food industry. The objective of this work was to evaluate the potential prebiotic effect of red and white grape residues, both obtained during the winemaking process. For such purpose, an in vitro study with pure cultures of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium was first conducted. Secondly, a study with mixed cultures using human fecal inocula was carried out in a simulator of the distal part of the colon. The obtained results showed an increase in the Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium population, indicating that these ingredients are serious candidates to be considered as prebiotics.


Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Modelos Biológicos , Pigmentos Biológicos/metabolismo , Componentes Aéreos de las Plantas/química , Extractos Vegetales/metabolismo , Prebióticos , Vitis/química , Adulto , Animales , Bifidobacterium/clasificación , Bifidobacterium/crecimiento & desarrollo , Bifidobacterium/aislamiento & purificación , Bifidobacterium/metabolismo , Digestión , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Fermentación , Industria de Procesamiento de Alimentos/economía , Humanos , Residuos Industriales/análisis , Residuos Industriales/economía , Lactobacillus/clasificación , Lactobacillus/crecimiento & desarrollo , Lactobacillus/aislamiento & purificación , Lactobacillus/metabolismo , Masculino , Viabilidad Microbiana , Tipificación Molecular , Componentes Aéreos de las Plantas/metabolismo , Extractos Vegetales/economía , Prebióticos/economía , España , Vitis/metabolismo
2.
Panminerva Med ; 52(4): 269-75, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21183886

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of colostrum (ARD Colostrum) in association with the immunomodulator Bifivir in the prevention of flu episodes compared with anti-flu vaccination. The registry groups included no prevention, vaccination, vaccination+immunomodulators, and immunomodulators only. Groups were comparable for age and sex distribution. In the group without prevention there were 8 major episodes and 12 minor episodes out of 34 subjects (8-12/34); in the vaccination group the respective figures were 8-13/38; in the group treated with a combination of vaccination and immunomodulators (ARD Colostrum + Bifivir) the figures were 4-9/33; and in the group treated with immunomodulators only there were 11 viral episodes (3-8) in 36 subjects. The episodes in the vaccination+immunomodulators and immunomodulators only groups were significantly lower compared with the other two groups (P<0.05). The number of episodes registered with the immunnomodulators was significantly lower than those observed in patients using vaccination or no prevention (P<0.05). The number of days of disease was higher in untreated controls compared to the groups treated with immunomodulators (P<0.05) and 2 times higher in the vaccination group compared to the same groups (P<0.05). The average relative costs were significantly lower (2.3 times) in the immunomodulators groups in comparison with the other groups (P<0.05). No problems concerning tolerability or side effects were observed during the study. Compliance was very good. In conclusion, the administration of immunomodulators is very cost effective and appears to be more effective than vaccination to prevent flu.


Asunto(s)
Calostro/inmunología , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Prebióticos , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Factores Inmunológicos/economía , Vacunas contra la Influenza/economía , Gripe Humana/economía , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/virología , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prebióticos/efectos adversos , Prebióticos/economía , Embarazo , Probióticos/efectos adversos , Probióticos/economía , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA