Effects of Supplemental Calcium and Vitamin D on Expression of Toll-Like Receptors and Phospho-IKKα/ß in the Normal Rectal Mucosa of Colorectal Adenoma Patients.

Chronic inflammation in the colorectum, a significant contributor to colorectal carcinogenesis, can be triggered by the activation of proinflammatory signaling pathways such as those initiated by Toll-like receptors (TLR) and nuclear factor κB (NF-κB). Although experimental evidence supports calcium and vitamin D potentially modifying these proinflammatory pathways in the colorectum, human data in these regards are scarce. We investigated supplemental calcium (1,200 mg daily) and/or vitamin D3 (1,000 IU daily) effects on inflammatory signaling pathway-related biomarkers in a subset of 105 participants from a colorectal adenoma recurrence chemoprevention clinical trial. We assessed expression of TLR4 and TLR5, which recognize the bacterial components lipopolysaccharides and flagellin, respectively, and phospho-IKKα/ß (pIKKα/ß), a biomarker of inflammation, in the normal-appearing rectal crypt epithelium and stroma using standardized, automated immunohistochemistry and quantitative image analysis. Following 1 year of treatment, TLR4, TLR5, and pIKKα/ß expression in the rectal mucosa did not statistically significantly change with vitamin D or calcium supplementation, taken alone or in combination. Several baseline participant characteristics, including body mass index, history of sessile serrated adenomas, high red/processed meat intake, and high levels of rectal epithelial cell proliferation (as measured by MIB-1/Ki-67), were associated with higher baseline expression of TLRs or pIKKα/ß. Our findings suggest that vitamin D and calcium may have no substantial effect on the investigated biomarkers. However, several modifiable lifestyle factors may be associated with TLRs and pIKKα/ß expression in the normal rectal mucosa, supporting their future investigation as potentially treatable, preneoplastic risk factors for colorectal neoplasms. Cancer Prev Res; 11(11); 707-16. ©2018 AACR.

Effects of mesalazine enemas on lymphoid follicular proctitis.

Lymphoid follicular proctitis (LFP) is an uncommon inflammatory disease that is characterized by rectal bleeding, congested and granular mucosa without ulceration and abnormal and coalescing hyperplastic lymphoid follicles without acute inflammatory changes. The lesions are usually confined to the rectal mucosa. LFP therapy is not well defined. Herein, we present a case of LFP that was resolved with a rapid administration of mesalazine enemas. A 35-year-old male was admitted to our hospital due to intermittent rectal bleeding associated with stools. Total colonoscopy revealed nodular mucosa with top pinpoint-like ulcers from the rectum to the border between the sigmoid flexure and the rectum. The nodules congested together on the lower rectal segment and occupied 2/3 of the rectal lumina. Endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed in order to obtain more specimens for histologic examination, which revealed marked lymphoid follicular hyperplasia with prominent germinal centers and a conserved mantle zone. Treatment was started with mesalazine enemas of 4 g q.d. and the patient was asymptomatic after three days. All the lesions disappeared two months later. Mesalazine enemas could be a promising and effective therapeutic option for LFP therapy.

Effect of butyrate enemas on gene expression profiles and endoscopic/histopathological scores of diverted colorectal mucosa: A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: A temporary stoma is often created to protect a distal anastomosis in colorectal surgery. Short-chain fatty acids, mainly butyrate, are the major fuel source for the epithelium and their absence in the diverted tract may produce mucosal atrophy and inflammation. AIMS: To investigate whether the administration of sodium butyrate enemas (Naburen(©), Promefarm, Italy) could prevent mucosal inflammation and atrophy and affect gene expression profiles after ileo/colostomy. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, in patients with enterostomy performed for inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer or diverticulitis. Twenty patients were randomly allocated to receive 30ml of sodium butyrate 600mmol/L (group A) or saline (group B), b.i.d. for 30 days. RESULTS: In group A endoscopic scores were significantly improved (p<0.01) while mucosal atrophy was reduced or unchanged; in group B mucosal atrophy was increased in 42.8% of patients. Despite the high dose of butyrate used, no short-chain fatty acids were detectable by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in colorectal biopsies. Group A patients showed up-regulation of genes associated with mucosal repair such as Wnt signalling, cytoskeleton regulation and bone morphogenetic protein-antagonists. CONCLUSION: Butyrate enemas may prevent the atrophy of the diverted colon/rectum, thus improving the recovery of tissue integrity.

[New approaches in surgical treatment of acute paraproctitis].

The results of treatment of 77 patients, ageing 18-71 yrs old, for an acute paraproctitis in 2010-2014 yrs were analyzed. A preventive puncture-flush enzymosanation of purulent foci, using immobilized bacterial proteinases (imozimase), metrogyl P in conjunction with low-intensive laser irradiation have permitted to conduct the optimal preoperative preparation of patients, to improve their state, to reduce the local inflammatory reactions intensity significantly.

Daily sodium butyrate enema for the prevention of radiation proctitis in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical radiation therapy: results of a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled dose-finding phase 2 study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of sodium butyrate enemas (NABUREN) in prostate cancer radiation therapy (RT) in reducing the incidence, severity, and duration of acute RT-induced proctitis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 166 patients, randomly allocated to 1 of 4 groups (rectal sodium butyrate 1 g, 2 g, or 4 g daily or placebo), were treated with NABUREN during and 2 weeks after RT. The grade of proctitis was registered in a daily diary. The correlation between NABUREN and proctitis was investigated through χ(2) statistics. The toxicity endpoints considered were as follows: total number of days with grade ≥1 proctitis (≥G1); total number of days with grade ≥2 proctitis (≥G2); ≥G1 and ≥G2 proctitis lasting at least 3 and 5 consecutive days starting from week 4 (≥G1+3d, ≥G2+3d); damaging effects of RT on rectal mucosa as measured by endoscopy. The relationship between endpoints and pretreatment morbidities, hormonal therapy, presence of diabetes or hypertension, abdominal surgery, or hemorrhoids was investigated by univariate analysis. RESULTS: The patients were randomly allocated to the 4 arms. No difference in the distribution of comorbidities among the arms was observed (P>.09). The mean ≥G1 and ≥G2 proctitis were 7.8 and 4.9 for placebo and 8.9 and 4.7 for the NABUREN group, respectively. No favorable trend in reduction of incidence, severity, and duration of ≥G1 and ≥G2 proctitis was observed with NABUREN use. In univariate analysis, ≥G1+3d toxicity was found to be related to hemorrhoids (P=.008), and a slight correlation was found between ≥G2 proctitis and hormonal therapy (P=.06). The RT effects on rectal mucosa as based on endoscopic assessment were mainly related to diabetes (P<.01). Endoscopy data at 6 week showed no significant difference between the placebo and butyrate arms. The other investigated endpoints were not correlated with any of the clinical risk factors analyzed. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of efficacy of NABUREN in reducing the incidence, severity, and duration of acute radiation proctitis. There was a correlation between some endpoints and clinical risk factors.

Formalin dab, the effective way of treating haemorrhagic radiation proctitis: a randomized trial from a tertiary care hospital in South India.

AIM: Chronic radiation proctitis with bleeding is a common problem encountered following radiotherapy for pelvic malignancy. Sucralfate-steroid enema and formalin dab are two common nonsurgical treatments. A randomized trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of these two methods. METHOD: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted in the Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER) from August 2005 to May 2007. One-hundred and two patients with chronic radiation proctitis, presenting as rectal bleeding after radiotherapy for carcinoma of the cervix, were recruited and randomly allocated into two treatment groups: Group 1, formalin dab; and Group 2, sucralfate-steroid retention enema. The mean age of the patients was 51.3 ± 5.1 years. The mean interval between the end of radiotherapy and the onset of bleeding was 12.3 ± 3.5 months. Symptom score and sigmoidoscopic grade were assessed before, and at 1 month after, treatment. RESULTS: Ninety per cent of patients in Group 1 and 74.5% of patients in Group 2 responded to treatment (P = 0.038). In spite of having a higher median symptom score before treatment, patients in Group 1 demonstrated a marked decrease in symptom score after treatment compared with patients in Group 2 and the difference once again was statistically significant (P = 0.000). Similarly, the median sigmoidoscopic grade was significantly lower for patients in Group 1 compared with patients in Group 2 after treatment (P = 0.000). There were no specific treatment-related complications in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Formalin (4%) dab is superior to sucralfate-steroid retention enema for treatment of chronic haemorrhagic radiation proctitis.

Efficacy of polaprezinc for acute radiation proctitis in a rat model.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to standardize the experimental rat model of radiation proctitis and to examine the efficacy of polaprezinc on radiation proctitis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 54 female Wistar rats (5 weeks old) were used. The rats were divided into three groups: those treated with polaprezinc (PZ+), those treated with base alone, exclusive of polaprezinc (PZ-), and those treated without any medication (control). All the rats were irradiated to the rectum. Polaprezinc was prepared as an ointment. The ointment was administered rectally each day after irradiation. All rats were killed on the 10th day after irradiation. The mucosal changes were evaluated endoscopically and pathologically. The results were graded from 0 to 4 and compared according to milder or more severe status, as applicable. RESULTS: According to the endoscopic findings, the proportion of mild changes in the PZ+, PZ-, and control group was 71.4%, 25.0%, and 14.3% respectively. On pathologic examination, the proportion of low-grade findings in the PZ+, PZ-, and control group was 80.0%, 58.3%, and 42.9% for mucosal damage, 85.0%, 41.7%, and 42.9% for a mild degree of inflammation, and 50.0%, 33.3%, and 4.8% for a shallow depth of inflammation, respectively. The PZ+ group tended to have milder mucosal damage than the other groups, according to all criteria used. In addition, significant differences were observed between the PZ+ and control groups regarding the endoscopic findings, degree of inflammation, and depth of inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: This model was confirmed to be a useful experimental rat model for radiation proctitis. The results of the present study have demonstrated the efficacy of polaprezinc against acute radiation-induced rectal disorders using the rat model.

Rebampide enema therapy as a treatment for patients with chronic radiation proctitis: initial treatment or when other methods of conservative management have failed.

INTRODUCTION: Radiation proctitis is a common complication following radiation therapy for pelvic malignancies. There have been no formal trials of treatment for radiation proctitis and a variety of methods are currently used. We assessed the efficacy of rebamipide enema to control symptoms and proctoscopic findings from radiation proctitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with radiation proctitis were enrolled. Enemas containing 150 mg rebamipide per dosing were administered after morning bowel movement, and always prior to bedtime, twice daily for 4 weeks. The efficacy of treatment was assessed from clinical symptoms (Subjective Objective Management Analysis Scale for Rectal Toxicity) and endoscopic findings. RESULTS: The mean bleeding score improved from 2.67 to 0.53 (P < 0.01). The mean symptom scores improved in those patients who had pain (0.40 to 0.13), tenesmus (0.40 to 0.20), and stool frequency (0.27 to 0.13). The mean improvement in telangiectasia scores (2.13 to 0.80, P < 0.01), bleeding point scores (1.80 to 0.27, P < 0.01), and friable mucosa scores (1.33 to 0.20, P < 0.01) were all statistically significant. No side effects were noted in any patients. CONCLUSION: Rebamipide enema therapy for radiation proctitis is a safe and effective treatment of radiation proctitis. We suggest the value of rebamipide enema in the treatment of radiation proctitis when other conservative management or first treatment has failed.

Effect of budesonide enema on remission and relapse rate in distal ulcerative colitis and proctitis.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticosteroid enemas are equally effective as 5-ASA enemas in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis (UC). With the introduction of budesonide, the risk of systemic side effects may be reduced. We investigated whether budesonide enema, 2 mg/100 ml, administered twice daily (b.i.d.) could increase the remission rate in comparison with the once daily (o.d.) standard regimen. Furthermore, we evaluated whether 2 mg budesonide enema, given twice weekly, could have a relapse preventing effect. METHODS: 149 patients with active distal UC were treated in a controlled, double-blind multicentre study with two parallel groups: placebo enema in the morning and budesonide enema in the evening (i.e. 2 mg/day) or budesonide enema b.i.d. (i.e. 4 mg/day) until remission (absence of clinical symptoms and endoscopic healing) or at most 8 weeks. Patients in remission were randomized to either budesonide enema or placebo enema twice weekly for 24 weeks or until relapse. RESULTS: The remission rates at 4 weeks were 33% for o.d. and 41% for b.i.d. regimens (NS) and correspondingly 51% and 54% at 8 weeks (NS). The b.i.d. group had an increased frequency of impaired adrenal function, 32% versus 4.8% (P = 0.001). The relapse rates during maintenance treatment with budesonide enema and placebo were 15% versus 24% after 8 weeks, 31% versus 27% after 16 weeks and 41% versus 51% after 24 weeks (NS). CONCLUSION: Budesonide enema 2 mg o.d. appears to be the optimal dosage in active distal UC. We could not show that budesonide enema twice weekly is sufficient to maintain remission.

Neutrophil and eosinophil granule proteins as markers of response to local prednisolone treatment in distal ulcerative colitis and proctitis.

OBJECTIVE: The pathophysiological role of neutrophil and eosinophil granulocytes in relation to steroid enema treatment was studied in patients with distal ulcerative colitis and proctitis. METHODS: The rectal release of the neutrophil (myeloperoxidase, MPO), and eosinophil (eosinophilic cationic protein, ECP and eosinophil peroxidase, EPO) granule constituents were measured in 11 patients using intraluminal segmental perfusion of the rectum. The released amounts of MPO, ECP, and EPO in the perfusion fluids were determined by radioimmunoassays before and during prednisolone enema treatment and related to clinical, endoscopical, and histopathological data in addition to treatment outcome. RESULTS: Clinical activity and particularly endoscopic activity correlated well with intraluminal MPO concentrations both before and during treatment. At the end of the study, eight of 11 patients fulfilled predefined response criteria; all responding patients had significant decrease of MPO concentrations (p < 0.01). This decline of MPO concentration was seen after 7 days of treatment (p < 0.05) in the response group and often occurred before clinical improvement. There was a nonsignificant trend toward a decrease in the concentrations of ECP and EPO at the end of treatment in responders.

Mesalazine foam (Salofalk foam) in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis. A comparative trial vs Salofalk enema. The SAF-3 study group.

BACKGROUND: Mesalazine enemas are of well proven efficacy for the topical treatment of distal ulcerative colitis. Although new rectal formulations of mesalazine are not expected to be superior in efficacy and tolerability to standard formulations, they may offer secondary advantages in terms of overall acceptability. AIM: To compare the efficacy, tolerability and overall acceptability of a new mesalazine rectal foam (Salofalk foam) with mesalazine enema in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicentre study was carried out in patients with active proctitis, proctosigmoiditis and left-sided ulcerative colitis as evaluated by the Clinical Activity Index (CAI > or =4) and Endoscopic Index (EI > or =6). Patients were randomly assigned to receive, in open-label fashion, either mesalazine foam 2 g twice a day or mesalazine enema (2 g/60 ml twice a day) for 3 weeks. Patients who did not achieve remission (defined as CAI <4 and EI <6) after 3 weeks continued the study receiving the alternative galenic formulation for a further 3 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients were enrolled. Characteristics at baseline were similar except for concomitant therapy with oral 5-ASA products: during the 1st treatment phase, 41% of patients on enema received such treatment vs only 29% of those on foam. Patients with at least one post-treatment efficacy evaluation were included in the intent-to-treat analysis (n=89 foam, n=96 enema). After 3 weeks of treatment, 112 patients were in remission and only 59 patients entered the 2nd treatment phase thus providing data on acceptability. Remission was achieved after 3 weeks in 54% of patients treated with foam and in 67% of those treated with enema. The 90% confidence interval for the difference in remission rates was 0 to 24 and thus within the clinically acceptable range of therapeutic equivalence. At the end of the 2nd phase, 70% of patients switched to foam were in remission vs 65% to the enema. Two patients discontinued treatment with foam prematurely due to anal burning. No clinically important changes were seen in the laboratory tests. CONCLUSIONS: Salofalk foam and enema are equally effective for the treatment of proctitis, proctosigmoiditis and left-sided ulcerative colitis. The new foam preparation is as well tolerated and accepted as enemas and can be used as a therapeutic alternative to conventional mesalazine enema formulations.

Budesonide enema for the treatment of active, distal ulcerative colitis and proctitis: a dose-ranging study. U.S. Budesonide enema study group.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Budesonide is a highly potent topical glucocorticosteroid that is characterized by low systemic availability as a result of high first-pass hepatic metabolism. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three doses of an enema preparation of budesonide in patients with active distal ulcerative colitis/proctitis. METHODS: In a double-blind multicenter trial, 233 patients were randomized to receive either a placebo enema or budesonide enema at a dose of 0.5 mg/100 mL, 2.0 mg/100 mL, or 8.0 mg/100 mL. The primary efficacy variables were an improvement of sigmoidoscopic inflammation grade, total histopathology score, and remission rates. Effects on cortisol concentrations were also assessed. RESULTS: After 6 weeks of treatment, there was significant improvement in sigmoidoscopy and histopathology scores in the budesonide 2.0-mg and 8.0-mg dose groups compared with placebo. Remission was achieved in 19% of patients in the 2.0-mg budesonide group (P

Distal procto-colitis, natural cytotoxicity, and essential fatty acids.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, it has been postulated that patients with ulcerative colitis have altered natural cytotoxicity, in particular natural killer (NK) and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cell activities. These cellular mechanisms have been postulated to play an etiological role in the pathogenesis of the disease process. We have shown previously that the essential fatty acids (EFA) eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) specifically inhibit natural cytotoxicity. Our aim was to evaluate the role of omega-3 EFA in the modulation of natural cytotoxicity and disease activity in patients with distal procto-colitis. METHODS: In this pilot study patients were randomized into two groups. Each patient received either fish oil extract (EPA, 3.2 g, and DHA, 2.4 g) (n = 9) or sunflower oil (placebo) (n = 9) daily in a double-blind manner for 6 months. Monthly assessments of disease activity (clinical and sigmoidoscopic scores) and histological evaluation of mucosal biopsies were carried out. Also, the circulating levels and activities of NK and LAK cells, using flow cytometric analysis (CD16+ CD56+) and in vitro 51 chromium release assays (K562), respectively, were monitored. RESULTS: After 6 months' supplementation with EFA, there was improvement in the clinical activity compared with pretreatment evaluation. There was significant reduction in the sigmoidoscopic and histological scores in the EFA group compared with the placebo group. Essential fatty acid supplementation for 6 months also induced significant reduction in the circulating numbers of CD16+ and CD56+ cells and the cytotoxic activity of NK cells, compared with the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study has demonstrated that omega-3 fatty acids can suppress natural cytotoxicity and reduce disease activity in patients with distal procto-colitis. These findings suggest a therapeutic strategy for managing patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Short-chain fatty acids in the treatment of radiation proctitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over pilot trial.

PURPOSE: Treatment of chronic radiation proctitis remains unsatisfactory. Short-chain fatty acids are the preferred energy source for the colonic epithelium. We aimed to determine for the first time whether topical butyric acid enemas relieve symptoms and improve the macroscopic and microscopic findings in chronic radiation proctitis. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over pilot trial compared patients given two weeks of butyric acid enemas (40 mmol) twice per day with those given placebo, with a one-week washout period; 15 patients were randomized and 12 completed both arms of the trial. A total symptom score combined six symptom items per week (rectal pain, episodes of rectal bleeding, amount of blood passed, days with diarrhea, number of stools, and urgency). Symptom, endoscopic, and histologic scores were obtained at the beginning of the study and again at the last week of each treatment arm. RESULTS: Total symptom score at baseline (median, 5.5) improved for those patients receiving active treatment (median, 3.5), but compared with placebo (median, 4.5), the change was not significant. Endoscopic appearances were largely unaltered by active treatment. Histology was abnormal in 82 percent of patients receiving placebo compared with 55 percent of those given butyric acid enemas (P = not significant). CONCLUSION: Butyric acid enemas do not appear to be superior to placebo in the treatment of chronic radiation proctitis.

Anal canal inflammation after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The need for treatment.

UNLABELLED: One technique used during restorative proctocolectomy to prevent loss of continence involves preservation of the anal canal. This technique retains a small amount of colonic mucosa and transitional mucosa that may become inflamed or develop dysplastic or neoplastic changes. PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the presence and severity of anal canal inflammation and the need for treatment. METHOD: Records of 217 patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis who underwent restorative proctocolectomy with a stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without anal mucosectomy from 1987 through 1990 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Anal canal inflammation was evident on both endoscopy and biopsy in 48 patients (22.11 percent); 18 patients (8.29 percent) had a normal ileal pouch (9 had symptoms; 5 required topical treatment), and 30 patients (13.82 percent) had associated ileal pouch inflammation (23 with symptoms requiring systemic treatment because of pouchitis; 10 patients had concomitant topical treatment). CONCLUSION: Symptomatic inflammation of the retained mucosa occurred in 32 (14.7 percent) patients. Nine (4.1 percent) patients had inflammation of the anal canal alone, and 23 (10.6 percent) had pouchitis in addition. The need for treatment occurred in 28 (12.9 percent) of the total ((2.3 percent) patients with anal canal inflammation and 23 (10.6 percent) with anal canal inflammation plus pouchitis).