Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 51
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Value Health ; 24(6): 839-845, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34119082

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate alternative methods to calculate and/or attribute economic surplus in the cost-effectiveness analysis of single or short-term therapies. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review of articles describing alternative methods for cost-effectiveness analysis of potentially curative therapies whose assessment using traditional methods may suggest unaffordable valuations owing to the magnitude of estimated long-term quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gains or cost offsets. Through internal deliberation and discussion with staff at the Health Technology Assessment bodies in England and Canada, we developed the following 3 alternative methods for further evaluation: (1) capping annual costs in the comparator arm at $150 000 per year; (2) "sharing" the economic surplus with the health sector by apportioning only 50% of cost offsets or 50% of cost offsets and QALY gains to the value of the therapy; and (3) crediting the therapy with only 12 years of the average annual cost offsets or cost offsets and QALY gains over the lifetime horizon. The impact of each alternative method was evaluated by applying it in an economic model of 3 hypothetical condition-treatment scenarios meant to reflect a diversity of chronicity and background healthcare costs. RESULTS: The alternative with greatest impact on threshold price for the fatal pediatric condition spinal muscular atrophy type 1 was the 12-year cutoff scenario. For a hypothetical one-time treatment for hemophilia A, capping cost offsets at $150 000 per year had the greatest impact. For chimeric antigen receptor T-cell treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, capping cost offsets or using 12-year threshold had little impact, whereas 50% sharing of surplus including QALY gains and cost offsets greatly reduced threshold pricing. CONCLUSIONS: Health Technology Assessment bodies and policy makers will wrestle with how to evaluate single or short-term potentially curative therapies and establish pricing and payment mechanisms to ensure sustainability. Scenario analyses using alternative methods for calculating and apportioning economic surplus can provide starkly different assessment results. These methods may stimulate important societal dialogue on fair pricing for these novel treatments.


Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia/economía , Terapia Genética/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/economía , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica/economía , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/economía , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/economía , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de los Medicamentos , Terapia Genética/efectos adversos , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemofilia A/economía , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Linfoma no Hodgkin/economía , Linfoma no Hodgkin/terapia , Modelos Económicos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/economía , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Inducción de Remisión , Atrofias Musculares Espinales de la Infancia/economía , Atrofias Musculares Espinales de la Infancia/genética , Atrofias Musculares Espinales de la Infancia/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 127(3): 318-325.e2, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33775904

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe asthma may remain uncontrolled despite biologic therapy in addition to standard therapy, but this disease burden has not been quantified. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the clinical and economic burden in a US national sample. METHODS: Patients who have severe asthma with indicated biologic treatment (earliest use = index date) were selected from the MarketScan database between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2018. Inclusion criteria were continuous enrollment for 12 months postindex with a minimum of 2 biologic fills, greater than or equal to 12 years of age, evidence of medium- to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting ß-agonist combination before the index, and absence of other respiratory diagnoses and malignancies. Disease exacerbations (used to classify asthma control), health care costs, and treatment characteristics were reported during the 12-month postindex period. RESULTS: The sample included 3262 biologic patients; 88% with anti-immunoglobulin E therapy (omalizumab) and 12% non-anti-immunoglobulin E (reslizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab). The mean age was 49 (±15) years; 64% were women. Prescriptions included inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting ß-agonist (82%), systemic corticosteroids (76%), and leukotriene receptor antagonists (68%). Notably, 63% of patients presented greater than or equal to 1 asthma exacerbation (mean 1.3 per patient/year). Furthermore, 35% of patients were categorized as having controlled asthma, whereas 28% were suboptimally controlled and 29% were uncontrolled. Patients with uncontrolled disease had higher all-cause and asthma-related costs ($69,206 and $45,693, respectively) than patients with suboptimally controlled ($59,407 and $40,793, respectively) or controlled disease ($53,083 and $38,393, respectively). Furthermore, 62% of newly treated patients were persistent with their index biologic. CONCLUSION: Biologic therapies are effective in reducing exacerbations, but a substantial proportion of patients with severe asthma treated with current biologics continue to experience uncontrolled disease, highlighting a remaining unmet need for patients with severe uncontrolled asthma.


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antiasmáticos/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Asma/economía , Productos Biológicos/economía , Terapia Biológica/economía , Niño , Costo de Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Omalizumab/economía , Omalizumab/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
3.
Rheumatol Int ; 41(4): 787-793, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33386900

RESUMEN

The aim of the study was to estimate the annual direct costs of biological therapies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to establish possible factors associated with those costs. The main data source was the Moroccan registry of biological therapies in rheumatic diseases (RBSMR Registry). We included patients with available 1-year data. Variables related to socio-economic status, disease and biological therapy were collected. Direct costs included prices of biologics, costs of infusions, and subcutaneous injections. Differences in costs across groups were tested by Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Correlations analysis was performed in search of factors associated with high costs. We included 197 rheumatoid arthritis patients. The mean age was 52.3 ± 11 years, with female predominance 86.8%. Receiving one of the following therapies: rituximab (n = 132), tocilizumab (n = 37), or TNF-blockers (n = 28). Median one-year direct costs per patient were €1665 [€1472-€9879]. The total annual direct costs were € 978,494. Rituximab, constituted 25.7% of the total annual budget. TNF-blockers and tocilizumab represented 27.3% and 47% of this overall budget, respectively. Although the costs were not significantly different in terms of gender or level of study, the insurance type significantly affected the cost estimation. A positive correlation was found between the annual direct cost and body mass index (r = 0.15, p = 0.04). In Morocco, a developing country, the annual direct costs of biological therapy are high. Our results may contribute to the development of strategies for better governance of these costs.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/economía , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Productos Biológicos/economía , Terapia Biológica/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/economía , Factores Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Etanercept/economía , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Marruecos , Rituximab/economía , Rituximab/uso terapéutico
4.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am ; 49(4): 717-729, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33121691

RESUMEN

Five biologics are approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC): infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab. These drugs have varying levels of efficacy and are recommended as first-line treatment of moderate to severe UC. There has been only 1 head-to-head trial comparing the efficacy of the biologics, adalimumab and vedolizumab, which has important implications for management. Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics, especially anti-TNF alpha agents, may improve the long-term efficacy of these agents. The future of treatment may include personalization of medications, based on patient-specific and disease-specific characteristics as well as biomarkers, along with appropriate therapeutic drug monitoring.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Biológica , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adalimumab/economía , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/economía , Terapia Biológica/economía , Colitis Ulcerosa/economía , Ahorro de Costo , Monitoreo de Drogas , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Infliximab/economía , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ustekinumab/economía , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico
5.
J Ethnopharmacol ; 259: 112885, 2020 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32311487

RESUMEN

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: The Peruvian Amazon holds more than 1000 plant species with commercial potential and the national sales of natural products derived from medicinal and aromatic plants have exceeded $ 400 million per year. Research and development activities carried out on the genetic and biochemical composition of Peruvian flora have to abide by national and international regulations, such as the Nagoya Protocol (NP). AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this paper is to describe the implications of the current implementation of the NP in Peru for performing research on national genetic resources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the current legal framework and status of the NP in Peru was performed accompanied by first-hand experience undertaken by submitting a request for access to genetic resources related to wild continental species. RESULTS: So far, Peru has issued 16 Internationally Recognized Certificates of Compliance (IRCCs) through 2 of the identified National Authorities. Some of the difficulties and challenges observed have to do with the degree of effective implementation of the Access and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) system, the fact that the application process is not sufficiently clear, and the wide gap between this formal system and what occurs informally outside of it. In response to this, training and implementation projects have been launched and a new law on the access to genetic resources has been proposed. CONCLUSIONS: The difficulties observed still represent an obstacle to scientific research and the development of new commercial products based on Peruvian traditional knowledge and genetic resources. Although improvements have been made to the ABS framework, there remain major challenges to encouraging and ascertaining the equitable and sustainable use of Peru's biodiversity.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/economía , Investigación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Investigación/organización & administración , Biodiversidad , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Investigación Genética/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional
6.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 20(6): 16, 2020 04 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32323067

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a highly prevalent disease that results in significant healthcare-related costs as well as costs to society with lost productivity and time. Unfortunately, a significant percentage of patients who suffer with this disease will not find relief from current standard of care medications and surgery. With ongoing efforts to understand the pathophysiology of CRSwNP has come the introduction of monoclonal antibodies, or "biologics," targeting specific elements of the inflammatory pathway in CRSwNP. Despite efficacy, these come at significant cost and, to date, no studies on the cost-efficacy of these biologics in CRSwNP have been published. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple studies have now demonstrated efficacy for biologics in the treatment of CRSwNP as a primary indication. However, the gains in quality of life and objective measures, while consistent, are small and, arguably, the clinical significance is still unclear. In addition, the high cost of these medications may be hard to justify when evaluated in cost-efficacy studies against standard of care therapy in CRSwNP. Furthermore, while the current literature is most robust in showing the benefit of the biologics in asthma, it does not fully support cost-efficacy for biologics. This review evaluates the current literature regarding efficacy of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of CRSwNP and considers this efficacy in light of the cost implications to individuals and society.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Pólipos Nasales/tratamiento farmacológico , Rinitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/economía , Productos Biológicos/economía , Terapia Biológica/economía , Enfermedad Crónica , Fibrosis Quística/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrosis Quística/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Pólipos Nasales/economía , Rinitis/economía , Sinusitis/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 21(1): 109-117, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31452091

RESUMEN

Elderly patients are a group with a high frequency of psoriasis. Their disease burden has negative impacts on their quality of life. While there is a clear need to treat these patients, there are challenges in doing so. This work seeks to define the challenges that exist in treating elderly Medicare patients, as well as to provide treatment suggestions for providers to follow if they encounter one or more of these challenges. Providers face the following challenges when creating treatment plants for elderly patients with psoriasis: difficulty in obtaining drug coverage through Medicare, increased medical comorbidities, and polypharmacy. Providers aim for regimens that are affordable, safe, and efficacious, but it is not always clear how to achieve this combination, especially in elderly Medicare patients. This work is relevant in that it aims to explain the logistical roadblocks posed by Medicare coverage and provide solutions for commonly encountered issues in the treatment of a disabling and common disease in a high-risk population. Specifically, alternative treatment options to biologics and small-molecule inhibitors are discussed and include topical therapies, phototherapy, methotrexate, acitretin, and cyclosporine and for psoriatic arthritis include corticosteroids and leflunomide. The specific risks and benefits of these therapies in the elderly population are provided, allowing providers to make patient-specific decisions about optimal regimens.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Psoriásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Artritis Psoriásica/economía , Artritis Psoriásica/patología , Productos Biológicos/administración & dosificación , Productos Biológicos/economía , Fármacos Dermatológicos/economía , Humanos , Medicare/economía , Fototerapia/métodos , Psoriasis/economía , Psoriasis/patología , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Talidomida/economía , Estados Unidos
8.
JAMA Dermatol ; 155(12): 1380-1389, 2019 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31617856

RESUMEN

Importance: Systemic psoriasis treatments vary in efficacy and cost but also in time until onset of action. Patients with no response to a first induction treatment are typically switched to another, and some patients require several treatments before they see an improvement. Objective: To determine the most cost-effective sequence of induction treatment through a comparative time-effectiveness analysis of different systemic treatment sequences currently licensed in Germany for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This time-effectiveness analysis used a decision-analytic model set in the German health care system. The population simulated to receive the treatment sequences consisted of adult men and women with psoriasis vulgaris or plaque type psoriasis eligible for systemic treatment. Systematic reviews were performed to generate model input values. Data were collected from November 1 through December 15, 2017, and analyzed from January through August 2018. Interventions: Five treatment sequences frequently used in Germany, identified through an online expert survey (response rate, 10 of 15 [66.7%]), and 4 theoretical sequences starting with a biological agent. Treatments included methotrexate sodium (MTX), cyclosporine (CSA), fumaric acid esters (FAE), adalimumab (ADA), ixekizumab (IXE), infliximab (INF), and secukinumab (SEC). Main Outcomes and Measures: Two health states were defined: responder (patients achieving a Psoriasis Area Severity Index [PASI] ≥75) and nonresponder (PASI <75). Probability values were defined as response rates of PASI-75. Treatment effects were determined by the mean change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score. Time until onset of action was assessed as weeks until 25% of patients reach PASI-75. Individual time-effectiveness ratios were calculated per treatment sequence as time until onset of action (in weeks) per minimally important difference (MID) in DLQI and were subsequently ranked. Results: Treatment sequences starting with a biological agent, including IXE-INF-SEC (1.4 weeks per DLQI-MID), INF-IXE-SEC (2.05 weeks per DLQI-MID), SEC-IXE-ADA (2.1 weeks per DLQI-MID), and ADA-IXE-SEC (2.8 weeks per DLQI-MID) were more time-effective than frequently used treatment sequences, including MTX-SEC-ADA (6.8 weeks per DLQI-MID), MTX-ADA-IXE (7.0 weeks per DLQI-MID), MTX-ADA-SEC (7.2 weeks per DLQI-MID), MTX-FAE-ADA (10.05 weeks per DLQI-MID), and FAE-MTX-CSA (11.5 weeks per DLQI-MID). The results were robust to deterministic sensitivity analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: When allocating monetary resources, policy makers and regulators may want to consider time until patients experience an MID in their quality of life as an additional outcome measure. Trial Registration: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42017074218.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Modelos Económicos , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Productos Biológicos/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Vías Clínicas/economía , Vías Clínicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Fármacos Dermatológicos/economía , Dermatólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Psoriasis/economía , Psoriasis/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
PLoS One ; 14(9): e0222038, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31504051

RESUMEN

Unsustainable wildlife trade is a pervasive issue affecting wildlife globally. To address this issue, a plethora of demand reduction efforts have been carried out. These necessitate consumer research which provides crucial knowledge for designing and evaluating targeted interventions. We implemented a rigorous consumer survey on saiga (Saiga tatarica) horn use in Singapore, where usage is legal and widely sold. Saiga are Critically Endangered antelopes from Central Asia with horns (often marketed as ling yang) used in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Few past studies have assessed saiga horn consumers. This work is the most extensive consumer research to date specifically characterising saiga horn consumers and usage. We conducted 2294 in-person surveys on saiga horn use with Chinese Singaporeans, employing neutral questioning approaches. We found 19% of individuals reported saiga horn as a product they choose most often for themselves and/or others when treating fever and/or heatiness (a TCM state of illness), indicating a minimum estimate of high-frequency usage, not including possible low-frequency users. Overall saiga users were most characterised as middle-aged Buddhists and Taoists. However, saiga users were found in a range of demographic groups. Women preferred saiga shavings (the more traditional form), while men preferred saiga cooling water (the more modern form). About 53% of individuals who used saiga horn themselves also bought it for someone else. Buyers for others were most likely to be female middle-aged Buddhists or Taoists. Key motivating reasons for usage were "it works" and "someone recommended it to me." The top two reported recommenders were family and TCM shopkeepers. Saiga users were more likely than non-saiga users to perceive saiga as a common species in the wild. This research holds significance for interventions targeting saiga horn consumption within Singapore and throughout Asia, by identifying potential target audiences, product types, non-desirable alternatives, and motivations for use.


Asunto(s)
Cuernos de Venado/química , Comportamiento del Consumidor/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Tradicional China/estadística & datos numéricos , Motivación , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Antílopes , Productos Biológicos/economía , Budismo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicina Tradicional China/economía , Medicina Tradicional China/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Singapur , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
10.
Adv Ther ; 36(7): 1684-1699, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31102203

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to study drug survival and associated costs of biologic treatment in a German real-world cohort of biologic-naïve psoriasis patients. METHODS: We utilized a German claims database base with 3,682,561 enrolled patients between 2001 and 2015. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to show the persistence of different biologics. To determine factors that influence persistence, a Cox regression analysis was performed. In addition, associated costs were calculated 12 months before and after treatment start with biologics. RESULTS: Among 75,561 patients with a diagnosis of psoriasis, we identified 347 patients who received a biologic; 176 of them were biologic-naïve prior to initiating therapy. Overall, the 1-year persistence rate was 56%. The highest persistence rate was observed for ustekinumab (80%). Younger patients, and those with a high comorbidity index, had a numerically increased risk of treatment discontinuation. However, parameter values were not statistically significant. While the overall costs after treatment start increased due to the acquisition costs of biologics, we found a strong decrease (- 41%) in sick leave after treatment with biologics had been initiated. CONCLUSION: Observed drug survival rates in this real-world setting were relatively low. In line with previous studies, ustekinumab had a higher persistence rate than other biologics. FUNDING: Janssen-Cilag.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Psoriasis/economía , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Productos Biológicos/economía , Terapia Biológica , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/economía , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ustekinumab/economía
11.
Res Social Adm Pharm ; 15(3): 310-317, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29807834

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The approval of new biosimilars of infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab by the European Medicines Agency is expected to produce further cost savings to the healthcare system budget. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to estimate the budget impact of the introduction of new biosimilars Flixabi®, Erelzi®, Solymbic®, Amgevita® and Imraldi® in rheumatology and gastroenterology specialities in the UK. METHODS: A published budget impact model was adapted to estimate the expected cost savings following the entry of new biosimilars Flixabi®, Erelzi®, Solymbic®, Amgevita® and Imraldi® in the UK over three-year time horizon. This model was based on retrospective market shares of biologics used in rheumatology and gastroenterology which were derived from DEFINE Software and healthcare professional perspectives. RESULTS: The model predicted that infliximab and etanercept biosimilars would replace their corresponding reference agents by 2020. Adalimumab biosimilars were predicted to achieve 19% of the rheumatology and gastroenterology market by 2020. Without the introduction of further biosimilars, the model predicted a reduction in expenditure of £44 million on biologics over the next three years. With the entry of Flixabi®, Erelzi®, Solymbic®, Amgevita® and Imraldi® the model estimates cumulative savings of £285 million by 2020. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of new infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab biosimilars will be associated with considerable cost savings and have a substantial favourable impact on the UK NHS budget. The number of biosimilars and time of entry of is critical to create competition which will result in maximum cost savings.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/economía , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/economía , Adulto , Antirreumáticos/economía , Ahorro de Costo , Gastroenterología , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/economía , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Reumatología , Reino Unido
12.
Food Funct ; 9(9): 4888-4896, 2018 Sep 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30167607

RESUMEN

This work addresses the role of different by-products derived from the industrial extraction of orange juice in a possible anti-inflammatory effect in mice with colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium (DSS). Fresh orange residue (FOR), dry orange residue (DOR), orange liqueur (OL) and animal feed (AF), as well as commercial citrus pectin (CP), were administered to C57BL/6J mice for 15 days before starting the DSS treatment. Analysis of macroscopic parameters such as the Disease Activity Index (DAI) and the colonic weight/length ratio revealed an anti-inflammatory effect following intake of FOR, AF or CP. Moreover, q-PCR of RNA from colonic tissue indicated measurable changes in the expression of TNF-α, IL-1ß, iNOS, and intercellular adhesion molecules ICAM I, as well as in intestinal barrier proteins such as MUC-3, occludin, and ZO-1. Pectin, phenolic compounds and/or Maillard reaction products formed at initial steps were identified as relevant components exerting the ascribed beneficial effects. Our findings could open up the further application of a variety of orange by-products as food supplements in the potential amelioration of inflammatory bowel diseases.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Citrus sinensis/química , Colitis Ulcerosa/prevención & control , Suplementos Dietéticos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Frutas/química , Animales , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/análisis , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/química , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/economía , Productos Biológicos/análisis , Productos Biológicos/química , Productos Biológicos/economía , Colitis Ulcerosa/inmunología , Colitis Ulcerosa/metabolismo , Colitis Ulcerosa/patología , Colon/inmunología , Colon/metabolismo , Colon/patología , Citocinas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Citocinas/genética , Citocinas/metabolismo , Sulfato de Dextran , Industria de Procesamiento de Alimentos/economía , Frutas/economía , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Productos Finales de Glicación Avanzada/análisis , Productos Finales de Glicación Avanzada/economía , Productos Finales de Glicación Avanzada/uso terapéutico , Residuos Industriales/análisis , Residuos Industriales/economía , Mucosa Intestinal/inmunología , Mucosa Intestinal/metabolismo , Mucosa Intestinal/patología , Masculino , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Pectinas/análisis , Pectinas/economía , Pectinas/uso terapéutico , Fenoles/análisis , Fenoles/economía , Fenoles/uso terapéutico , Sustancias Protectoras/análisis , Sustancias Protectoras/química , Sustancias Protectoras/economía , Sustancias Protectoras/uso terapéutico , Organismos Libres de Patógenos Específicos
13.
BMC Dermatol ; 18(1): 5, 2018 07 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29996929

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Biological therapies (BTs) including infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADL), secukinumab (SCK) and ustekinumab (UST) are approved in Japan for the treatment of psoriasis. Although the persistence rates and medical costs of BTs treatment have been investigated in multiple foreign studies in recent years, few such studies have been conducted in Japan and the differences between patients who adhered to treatment and those who did not have not been reported. This study is aimed at investigating the persistence rates and medical costs of BTs in the treatment of psoriasis in Japan, using the real-world data from a large-scale claims database. METHODS: Claims data from the JMDC database (August 2009 to December 2016) were used for this analysis. Patient data were extracted using the ICD10 code for psoriasis and claims records of BT injections. Twelve-month and 24-month persistence rates of BTs were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology, and 12-month-medical costs before and after BT initiation were compared between persistent and non-persistent patient groups at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 205 psoriasis patients treated with BTs (BT-naïve patients: 177) were identified. The 12-month/24-month persistence rates for ADL, IFX, SCK, and UST in BT-naïve patients were 46.8% ± 16.6%/46.8 ± 16.6%, 53.0% ± 14.9%/41.0% ± 15.5%, 55.4%/55.4% (95% CI not available) and 79.4% ± 9.9%/71.9% ± 12.2%, respectively. Statistically significant differences in persistence were found among different BT treatments, and UST was found to have the highest persistence rate. The total medical costs during the 12 months after BT initiation in BT-naïve patients were (in 1000 Japanese Yen): 2218 for ADL, 3409 for IFX, 465 for SCK, 2824 for UST (average: 2828). Compared with the 12-month persistent patient group, the total medical costs in the persistent group was higher (Δ:+ 118), but for some medications such as IFX or UST cost increases were lower for persistent patients. CONCLUSIONS: UST was found to have the highest persistence rate among all BTs for psoriasis treatment in Japan. The 12-month medical costs after BT initiation in the persistent patient group may not have increased as much as in the non-persistent patient group for some medications.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/economía , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Biológica/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adalimumab/economía , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antirreumáticos/economía , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Biológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Fármacos Dermatológicos/economía , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Infliximab/economía , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psoriasis/economía , Psoriasis/epidemiología , Ustekinumab/economía , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico , Privación de Tratamiento/economía , Privación de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 24(7): 654-663, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29952710

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic, hyper-proliferative dermatological condition associated with joint symptoms known as psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In a 2013 review, the total economic burden of PsA was estimated at $51.7-$63.2 billion. The economic burden of moderate to severe psoriasis patients has reduced significantly with the advent of biologics, but there remains a dearth of real-world evidence of the impact of treatment persistence on the economic burden of moderate to severe psoriasis and/or PsA patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the overall and psoriasis and/or PsA-related health care utilization and costs among patients who were persistent versus those nonpersistent on index biologic among the moderate to severe psoriasis and/or PsA population. METHODS: Adult patients with ≥ 2 claims with diagnosis of psoriasis and/or PsA during the period of November 2010-October 2015 were identified from the U.S. Department of Defense database; the first diagnosis date during November 2011-October 2014 was defined as the index date. As of the index date, patients were considered to have moderate to severe psoriasis or PsA if they had ≥ 1 nontopical systemic therapy or phototherapy during the 1-year pre- or 1-month post-index date. Persistence to index therapy, defined as the first biologic used (etanercept, adalimumab, ustekinumab, infliximab) on or within 30 days post-index date, was determined based on the biologic dosing schedule and a 90-day gap. Generalized linear models were used to compare the health care utilization and costs between persistent and nonpersistent patients during the 1-year post-index period. RESULTS: A total of 2,945 moderate to severe psoriasis and/or PsA patients were identified. Of those, 1,899 (64.5%) were persistent and 1,046 (35.5%) were nonpersistent. Compared with nonpersistent patients, persistent patients were older (49.2 vs. 45.5 years; P < 0.001) and more likely to be male (52% vs. 45%; P < 0.001). More persistent patients were diagnosed with dyslipidemia (40% vs. 35%; P = 0.002), had lower antidepressant use (23.4% vs. 27.4%; P < 0.001), and had lower anxiolytic use (30% vs. 37%; P < 0.001) compared with nonpersistent patients. After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, nonpersistent patients had higher total medical costs ($12,457 vs. $8,964; P < 0.001) compared with persistent patients, and ambulatory visits (23.9 vs. 21.4; P = 0.007) were a major contributor. Approximately 40% of the total overall medical costs were attributed to psoriasis and PsA. Although persistent patients incurred higher pharmacy costs ($10,684 vs. $7,849; P < 0.001) due to higher biologic use and the potentially high per-unit cost of biologics, their psoriasis- and/or PsA-related medical costs were significantly lower than those of nonpersistent patients ($3,395 vs. $5,041; P < 0.001). Total overall costs combining medical and pharmacy costs were similar between the cohorts ($22,678 vs. $21,477; P = 0.122). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to severe psoriasis and/or PsA patients who were persistent on index biologic treatment had higher pharmacy utilization and costs, albeit with lower medical costs and similar total costs, compared with nonpersistent patients. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs. Lee is a paid employee of Janssen Scientific Affairs. Xie, Wang, Vaidya, and Baser are paid employees of STATinMED Research, which is a paid consultant to Janssen Scientific Affairs. This study was presented as an abstract at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2017 Annual Meeting, March 27-30, 2017, in Denver, CO.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Psoriasis/economía , United States Department of Defense/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/economía , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fototerapia/economía , Fototerapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Psoriasis/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
15.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 32(12): 2191-2199, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29729105

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively neutralizes interleukin 17A, has demonstrated strong and sustained efficacy in adults with moderate to severe psoriasis in clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: This analysis compared the cost per responder of secukinumab as first biologic treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis, with adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept and ustekinumab in Germany. METHODS: A 52-week decision-tree model was developed. Response to treatment was assessed based on the likelihood of achieving a predefined Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response to separate the cohort into responders (PASI ≥75), partial responders (PASI 50 to 74) and non-responders (PASI <50). Responders at week 16 continued initial treatment, whereas partial responders and non-responders were switched to standard of care, which included methotrexate, cyclosporine, phototherapy and topical corticosteroids. Sustained response was defined as 16-week response maintained at week 52. A German healthcare system perspective was adopted. Clinical efficacy data were obtained from a mixed-treatment comparison; 2016 resource unit costs from national sources; and adverse events and discontinuation rates from the literature. We calculated cost per PASI 90 responder over week 16 and week 52, as well as cost per sustained responder between weeks 16 and 52. RESULTS: Secukinumab had the lowest cost per PASI 90 responder over 16 weeks (€18 026) compared with ustekinumab (€18 080), adalimumab (€23 499), infliximab (€29 599) and etanercept (€34 037). Over 52 weeks, costs per PASI 90 responder ranged from €42 409 (secukinumab) to €70 363 (etanercept). Likewise, secukinumab had the lowest cost per sustained 52-week PASI 90 responder (€22 690) compared with other biologic treatments. Sensitivity analyses, excluding patient copayments, showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: First biologic treatment with secukinumab for moderate to severe psoriasis is cost-effective, with lowest cost per responder compared with other biologic treatments in Germany.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/economía , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adalimumab/economía , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Productos Biológicos/economía , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Etanercept/economía , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Alemania , Humanos , Infliximab/economía , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Psoriasis/economía , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ustekinumab/economía , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico
16.
PLoS One ; 13(4): e0193489, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29624580

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies in Taiwan utilizing the Taiwan's National Health Insurance Database (NHIRD) have estimated the direct healthcare costs of RA patients, but they have not focused on patients on bDMARDs, or considered patients' response to therapy. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to estimate the rate of inadequate response for patients newly treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) as well as their costs and resource use. METHODS: Data were from the catastrophic illness file within the NHIRD from 1/1/2009 to 12/31/2013. Patients with RA, which was categorized by the presence of a catastrophic illness card, that were previously bDMARD-naïve, were included in this study if they initiated their first bDMARD during the index period. The index period included all of 2010, a pre-index period consisting of the index date- 365 days, and a follow-up period including the index date to 365 days post-index, were also included. Previously biologically-naïve patients were indexed into the study on the date of their first claim for a bDMARD. A validated algorithm was used to examine the rate of inadequate response (IR) in the biologically-naïve cohort of patients. Inadequate responders met one or more of the following criteria during their year of follow-up: low adherence (proportion of days covered <0.80); switched to or added a second bDMARD; added a new conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD); received ≥1 glucocorticoid injection; or increased oral glucocorticoid dosing. All-cause mean annual direct costs and resource use were measured in the year of follow-up. Costs were converted from NT$ to USD using 1 NT$ = 0.033 USD. RESULTS: A total of 818 patients with RA initiated their first bDMARD (54% etanercept and 46% adalimumab) in 2010. After one year of follow-up, 32% (n = 258) were classified as stable, 66% (n = 540) had an IR, and 2% (n = 20) were lost to follow-up. During the follow-up period mean annual total direct costs were $16,136 for stable patients compared to $14,154 for patients with IR. Mean annual non-medication direct costs were $937 for stable patients and $1,574 for patients with IR. Mean annual hospitalizations were higher for patients with IR (0.46) compared to stable patients (0.10) during the one year follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients that were previously naïve to bDMARDs had an IR to their first bDMARD during the year of follow-up. Patients with an IR had numerically increased all-cause resource utilization and non-medication costs during the follow-up period compared to patients with stable disease. This level of IR suggests an unmet need in the RA treatment paradigm.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/economía , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Productos Biológicos/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Adalimumab/economía , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/economía , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Bases de Datos Factuales , Etanercept/economía , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taiwán , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Environ Manage ; 62(1): 29-44, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29313070

RESUMEN

At the end of the 20th century, optimism existed that non-timber forest products (NTFPs) can form an integral part in conservation and development strategies. However, there is limited knowledge on how the different stakeholders could relate to the state or to each other in promoting commercialization of NTFPs. Applying the policy network as an analytical framework, we investigated the structural patterns of actor relations in the governance structure of indigenous natural products (INPs) in Namibia, to understand the implications of such relations on INP policy process. The findings indicate that the INP policy network in Namibia is multi-dimensional, consisting of the Indigenous Plant Task Team (IPTT)-the key governance structure for resource mobilization and information sharing; and functional relations which serve specific roles in the INP value chain. The existing relations have facilitated policy development particularly for heavily regulated species, such as devil's claw; but for other species, only incremental changes are observed in terms of small-scale processing facilities for value addition and exclusive purchase agreements for sustainable sourcing of INPs. Participation of primary producers, private actors and quality standardization bodies is limited in INPs governance structures, which narrow the scope of information sharing. Consequently, despite that the IPTT has fostered publicly funded explorative pilot projects, ranging from production to marketing of INPs, there are no clear guidelines how these projects results can be transferred to private entities for possible commercialization. Further collaboration and information sharing is needed to guide public sector relations with the private entities and cooperatives.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/economía , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/métodos , Política Ambiental/tendencias , Bosques , Regulación Gubernamental , Formulación de Políticas , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/economía , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política Ambiental/economía , Política Ambiental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Medicina Tradicional , Namibia
18.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 47(3): 364-370, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29164650

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Real-world data quantifying the costs of increasing use of biologics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are unknown. AIM: To determine the outpatient IBD drug utilization trends, relative market share, and costs in the USA during a 9-year period. METHODS: The Truven MarketScan® Database was analysed for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) during 2007-2015. National drug codes were used to identify prescription drugs; Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System J-codes were used to capture biologic out-patient infusions. Proportion of drug usage, relative market share and per-member per-year (PMPY) costs were analysed for biologics, immunomodulators, 5-ASAs and corticosteroids. RESULTS: In 415 405 patients (188 842 CD; 195 183 UC; 31 380 indeterminate colitis; 54.67% female), utilization trends show a consistent rise in the market share of biologics during the 9-year study period. The proportion of patients using biologics increased from 21.8% to 43.8% for CD and 5.1%-16.2% for UC. This contrasts a small decrease in immunomodulator and 5-ASA use for CD and relative constancy of other classes including corticosteroids-only use as primary IBD medication from 2007 to 2015. The average biologic-taking patient accounted for $25 275 PMPY in 2007 and $36 051 PMPY in 2015. The average paediatric biologic-taking patient accounted for $23 616 PMPY in 2007 and $41 109 PMPY in 2015. In all patients, the share of costs for biologics increased from 72.9% in 2007 to 85.7% in 2015 (81.7% in 2007 to 94.9% in 2015 in paediatrics). CONCLUSION: The vast majority of costs allocated to out-patient IBD medications in the USA is attributed to increasing use of biologic therapies despite the relative minority of biologic-taking patients.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/economía , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Biológica , Sector de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/economía , Reclamos Administrativos en el Cuidado de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/economía , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Terapia Biológica/economía , Terapia Biológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Biológica/tendencias , Niño , Preescolar , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Sector de Atención de Salud/economía , Sector de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/economía , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Mesalamina/economía , Mesalamina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
Folia Med (Plovdiv) ; 59(3): 326-335, 2017 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28976906

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis vulgaris (PsV) is a chronic skin condition that has a major impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). AIM: To determine the individual burden of PsV on HRQOL using willingness to pay (WTP) instrument. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one consecutive PsV patients were asked to evaluate their overall health and psoriasis affected health by visual analogue scale (VAS), and interviewed on 8 domains (physical, emotional, sleep, work, social, self-care, intimacy, and concentration) of HRQOL and WTP for a hypothetical cure in each domain. Two additional questions proposing 6 alternatives for therapy were also asked. The analysis is performed with descriptive and frequency statistics, Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: The domains ranked highly were: physical comfort (90%), social comfort (77%), emotional health (75%) and work (53%). The following tendencies concerning WTP for top four impacted domains were found: the median WTP were the highest in the top impacted domains; the younger patients were willing to pay more than the older ones; the highest median WTP amounts appear in the lowest income group; the highest median WTP is associated with smaller psoriasis affected health VAS scores. The largest proportion and number of patients (37.3%, n=19) stated preferences for the systemic therapy. The second preferred choice was the thalassotherapy (29.4%, n=15). CONCLUSIONS: The utility and reliability of the instrument based on the assessment of WTP stated preferences for 8 domains of HRQOL for evaluation the individual burden of psoriasis were strongly supported.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Fármacos Dermatológicos/economía , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Psoriasis/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Administración Oral , Administración Tópica , Adulto , Anciano , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Bulgaria , Enfermedad Crónica , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Psoriasis/economía , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
20.
ACS Chem Neurosci ; 8(11): 2356-2368, 2017 11 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28862431

RESUMEN

Among the diseases affecting the central nervous system (CNS), neurodegenerations attract the interest of both the clinician and the medicinal chemist. The increasing average age of population, the growing number of patients, and the lack of long-term effective remedies push ahead the quest for novel tools against this class of pathologies. We present a review on the state of the art of the molecules (or combination of molecules) of natural origin that are currently under study against two well-defined pathologies: Parkinson's disease (PD) and Huntington's disease (HD). Nowadays, very few tools are available for preventing or counteracting the progression of such diseases. Two major parameters were considered for the preparation of this review: particular attention was reserved to these research works presenting well-defined molecular mechanisms for the studied compounds, and where available, papers reporting in vivo data were preferred. A literature search for peer-reviewed articles using PubMed, Scopus, and Reaxys databases was performed, exploiting different keywords and logical operators: 91 papers were considered (preferentially published after 2015). The review presents a brief overview on the etiology of the studied neurodegenerations and the current treatments, followed by a detailed discussion of the natural and semisynthetic compounds dividing them in different paragraphs considering their several mechanisms of action.


Asunto(s)
Antidiscinéticos/química , Productos Biológicos/química , Enfermedad de Huntington/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Antidiscinéticos/síntesis química , Antidiscinéticos/economía , Antidiscinéticos/uso terapéutico , Antioxidantes/farmacología , Antioxidantes/uso terapéutico , Antiparkinsonianos/síntesis química , Antiparkinsonianos/química , Antiparkinsonianos/economía , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Autofagia/efectos de los fármacos , Productos Biológicos/economía , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Demencia/tratamiento farmacológico , Demencia/economía , Demencia/epidemiología , Dopamina/metabolismo , Descubrimiento de Drogas , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Humanos , Enfermedad de Huntington/economía , Enfermedad de Huntington/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Huntington/fisiopatología , Microglía/efectos de los fármacos , Mitocondrias/efectos de los fármacos , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Inhibidores de la Monoaminooxidasa/uso terapéutico , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/economía , Enfermedad de Parkinson/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Preparaciones de Plantas/farmacología , Preparaciones de Plantas/uso terapéutico , Agregación Patológica de Proteínas/tratamiento farmacológico , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , alfa-Sinucleína/antagonistas & inhibidores
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA