Combination of ZD55-MnSOD therapy with 5-FU enhances antitumor efficacy in colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: ZD55-MnSOD is an E1B 55 kDa-deleted replication-competent adenovirus and armed with the therapeutic gene MnSOD. The expression of the therapeutic gene MnSOD increases with the selective replication of the oncolytic adenovirus (ZD55) so that ZD55-MnSOD has more significant activity than the replicate defective adenovirus Ad-MnSOD in vitro and in vivo. The tumor cannot be completely eradicated only with ZD55-MnSOD, although ZD55-MnSOD has obvious antitumor activity. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is still the most effective adjuvant therapy for patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: We reasoned that combined treatment of cancer cells with ZD55-MnSOD and 5-FU might have a synergistic effect. In vitro experiments with SW620 colorectal carcinoma cell line demonstrated that it was sensitive to ZD55-MnSOD, especially most sensitive to ZD55-MnSOD plus 5-FU treatment. Treatment with both ZD55-MnSOD and 5-FU could induce more significant apoptosis in cancer cells compared with ZD55-MnSOD or 5-FU alone, respectively. A better antitumor activity was observed by ZD55-MnSOD plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment. Tumor growth was greatly inhibited by this combined treatment, and animal survival time increased. CONCLUSION: These results show that, by using the combination therapies, a significant decrease in tumor mass can be achieved, which suggest that ZD55-MnSOD in combination with 5-FU may have potential clinical implications.

Adenovirus infection and cytotoxicity of primary mantle cell lymphoma cells.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a distinct form of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) derived from CD5+ B cells. MCL cells overexpress cyclin D1 as a consequence of translocation of the gene into the immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene locus. MCL is an aggressive form of NHL with frequent relapses after standard-dose chemotherapy. In this context, a variety of novel therapies for patients with MCL have been investigated. In this study, we use an expanded panel of attenuated adenoviruses to study adenovirus-mediated cytotoxicity of MCL cells. Our results demonstrate: 1) adenovirus infection of MCL cells despite the absence of receptor/coreceptor molecules known to be important for adenovirus infection of other cells types; 2) cytotoxicity of MCL cells after infection with specific adenovirus mutants; 3) a high degree of cytotoxicity after infection of some patient samples with viruses lacking the E1B 19k "antiapoptotic" gene; and 4) cytotoxicity after infection with viruses containing mutations in E1A pRb or p300 binding. The extent of cytotoxicity with the panel of viruses demonstrated interpatient variability, but 100% cytotoxicity, as determined by molecular analysis, was detected in some samples. These studies provide the foundation for: 1) the development of adenoviruses as cytotoxic agents for MCL and 2) analyses of key regulatory pathways operative in MCL cells.

[Phase III randomized clinical trial of intratumoral injection of E1B gene-deleted adenovirus (H101) combined with cisplatin-based chemotherapy in treating squamous cell cancer of head and neck or esophagus].

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: H101 is an E1B-55 kDa gene-deleted replication-selective adenovirus, which showed a significant antitumor activity. This study was to compare effects and toxicities of intratumoral H101 injection combined with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (PF) regimen or adriamycin plus 5-fluorouracil (AF) regimen versus PF or AF regimen alone in treating patients with head and neck or esophagus squamous cell cancer. METHODS: A total of 160 patients were recruited. PF regimen (cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) ivgtt, qd x 5d; 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) ivgtt, qd x 5d) was administered to patients have no history of PF chemotherapy,or sensitive to PF chemotherapy,while AF regimen (adriamycin 50 mg/m(2) iv,d1; 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) ivgtt, qd x 5d) was administered to patients didn't response to PF regimen. All patients were randomized to either receive intratumoral H101 injection (5.0 x 10(11)-1.5 x 10(12) VP/day for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks) or not. Treatment repeated every 3 weeks,all patients have to receive at least 2 cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Among 123 accordant patients,overall response rate of PF plus H101 group (group A1) was 78.8% (41/52),of PF alone group (group B1) was 39.6% (21/53),of AF plus H101 group (group A2) was 50.0% (7/14),of AF alone group (group B2) was 50.0% (2/4). Differences of response rates between group A1 and group B1,between group A1+A2 and group B1+B2 were significant (P=0.000). Main side effects were fever (45.7%), injection site reaction (28.3%),and influenza-like symptoms (9.8%). CONCLUSION: Intratumoral H101 injection showed a distinct efficacy in patients with squamous cell cancer of head and neck or esophagus,and was relatively safe.

Intra-tumor injection of H101, a recombinant adenovirus, in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancers: a pilot phase II clinical trial.

AIM: H101, an E1B 55 kD gene deleted adenovirus, has been shown to possess oncolysis activity experimentally and proved to be safe in preliminary phase I study. The current study was designed to evaluate its anti-tumor activity and toxicity in combination with chemotherapy in patients with late stage cancers. METHODS: H101 5.0x10(11) virus particles were given by intra-tumor injection daily for five consecutive days at every three-week cycle, combined with routine chemotherapy, to one of the tumor lesions of 50 patients with different malignant tumors. Tumor lesions without H101 injection in the same individuals were used as controls. The efficacy and toxicity were recorded. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were evaluable with a 30.4% response rate. H101 injection in combination with chemotherapy induced three complete response (CR) and 11 partial response (PR), giving an overall response rate of 28.0% (14/50) among intention-to-treat patients. The response rate for the control lesions was 13.0%, including one case with CR and five cases with PR, which was significantly lower than that for the injected lesions (P<0.05). Main side effects were fever (30.2%) and pain at the injected sites (26.9%). Grade 1 hepatic dysfunction was found in four patients, grade 2 in one patient, and grade 4 in one patient. Hematological toxicity (grade 4) was found in four patients. CONCLUSION: Intra-tumor injection of the genetically engineered adenovirus H101 exhibits potential anti-tumor activity to refractory malignant tumors in combination with chemotherapy. Low toxicity and good tolerance of patients to H101were observed.

Genetically modified adenoviruses against gliomas: from bench to bedside.

Oncolytic or tumor-selective adenoviruses are constructed as novel antiglioma therapies. After infection, the invading genetic adenoviral material is activated within the host cell. E1A and E1B adenoviral proteins are expressed immediately. E1A protein interacts with cell cycle regulatory proteins, such as retinoblastoma (Rb), driving the cell into the S phase and ensuing viral replication. The action of E1A stimulates the cellular p53 tumor suppressor system, which results in growth arrest or apoptosis, and halts adenovirus replication. However, adenoviral E1B interacts with p53 protein, preventing the DNA replication process from being abrogated by the induction of p53-mediated apoptosis. It was subsequently hypothesized that mutant adenoviruses that were unable to express wild-type E1A or E1B proteins could not replicate in normal cells with functional Rb or p53 pathways but instead would replicate and kill glioma cells that had defects in the regulation of these tumor suppressor pathways. Mutant E1B adenoviruses have already entered the clinical setting as an experimental treatment for patients with malignant gliomas. Mutant E1A adenoviruses are now in preclinical development as antiglioma therapy. In this review, the authors describe the mechanisms underlying the production of oncolytic adenoviruses, preclinical and clinical experiences with specific oncolytic adenoviruses, and the possibilities of combining mutant oncolytic adenoviruses with gene therapy or conventional therapies for managing malignant gliomas.

Conditionally replicative adenovirus for gastrointestinal cancers.

The clinical outcome of advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancers (especially pancreatic and oesophageal cancers) is dismal, despite the advance of conventional therapeutic strategies. Cancer gene therapy is a category of new therapeutics, among which conditionally replicative adenovirus (CRAd) is one promising strategy to overcome existing obstacles of cancer gene therapy. Various CRAds have been developed for GI cancer treatment by taking advantage of the replication biology of adenovirus. Some CRAds have already been tested in clinical trials, but have fallen short of initial expectations. Concerns for clinical applicability include therapeutic potency, replication selectivity and interval end points in clinical trials. In addition, improvement of experimental animal models is needed for a deeper understanding of CRAd biology. Despite these obstacles, CRAds continue to be an exciting area of investigation with great potential for clinical utility. Further virological and oncological research will eventually lead to full realisation of the therapeutic potential of CRAds in the field of GI cancers.

[Phase II clinical study of intratumoral H101, an E1B deleted adenovirus, in combination with chemotherapy in patients with cancer].

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: In recent years,great development have been made in cancer therapeutics with replication-competent viruses (oncolytic viruses), E1B deleted adenovirus is one of promising viruses. The current study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of intratumoral H101, a E1B-deleted adenovirus, in combination with chemotherapy on patients with cancer. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with malignant tumors in multiple centers clinical trial were treated with H101, 0.5ml 5x10(11) viral particle per day for 5 consecutive days every three weeks. Routine chemotherapy was performed at the same time. And the efficacy and toxicity were recorded. RESULTS: Among 46 valuable cases, the overall response rate was 30.4%. The response rate was 28.0% (14/50) among ITT population, including 3 complete response (CR) and 11 partial response (PR). The overall response rate of control lesion was 13.0%, including 1 case of CR and 5 cases of PR. Thus, the response rate in injected lesion is clearly higher than that in control lesion (P< 0.001). Main side effects were injection site pain (26.9%) and fever (30.2%). Grade 1 hepatic dysfunction was found in 4 patients, grade 2 in 1 patients, grade 4 in 1 patients. Grade 4 hematological toxicities were found in 4 patients. CONCLUSION: The study showed that the combination of genetically modified adenovirus (H101) and chemotherapy possessed some effect for treating the patients with refractory malignant tumors, and the toxicities were lower, well tolerated.

ONYX-015, an E1B gene-attenuated adenovirus, causes tumor-specific cytolysis and antitumoral efficacy that can be augmented by standard chemotherapeutic agents.

The 55-kilodalton (kDa) protein from the E1B-region of adenovirus binds to and inactivates the p53 gene, which is mutated in half of human cancers. We have previously shown that the replication and cytopathogenicity of an E1B, 55-kDa gene-attenuated adenovirus, ONYX-015, is blocked by functional p53 in RKO and U20S carcinoma lines. We now report that normal human cells were highly resistant to ONYX-015-mediated, replication-dependent cytolysis. In contrast, a wide range of human tumor cells, including numerous carcinoma lines with either mutant or normal p53 gene sequences (exons 5-9), were efficiently destroyed. Antitumoral efficacy was documented following intratumoral or intravenous administration of ONYX-015 to nude mouse-human tumor xenografts; efficacy with ONYX-015 plus chemotherapy (cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil) was significantly greater than with either agent alone.