Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.070
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Allergy ; 79(4): 908-923, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38311961

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pollen allergy poses a significant health and economic burden in Europe. Disease patterns are relatively homogeneous within Central and Northern European countries. However, no study broadly assessed the features of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) across different Southern European countries with a standardized approach. OBJECTIVE: To describe sensitization profiles and clinical phenotypes of pollen allergic patients in nine Southern European cities with a uniform methodological approach. METHODS: Within the @IT.2020 multicenter observational study, pediatric and adult patients suffering from SAR were recruited in nine urban study centers located in seven countries. Clinical questionnaires, skin prick tests (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) tests with a customized multiplex assay (Euroimmun Labordiagnostika, Lübeck, Germany) were performed. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-eight children (mean age 13.1 years, SD: 2.4 years) and 467 adults (mean age 35.7 years SD: 10.0 years) with a predominantly moderate to severe, persistent phenotype of SAR were recruited. Grass pollen major allergenic molecules (Phl p 1 and/or Phl p 5) ranged among the top three sensitizers in all study centers. Sensitization profiles were very heterogeneous, considering that patients in Rome were highly poly-sensitized (sIgE to 3.8 major allergenic molecules per patient), while mono-sensitization was prominent and heterogeneous in other cities, such as Marseille (sIgE to Cup a 1: n = 55/80, 68.8%) and Messina (sIgE to Par j 2: n = 47/82, 57.3%). Co-sensitization to perennial allergens, as well as allergic comorbidities also broadly varied between study centers. CONCLUSIONS: In Southern European countries, pollen allergy is heterogeneous in terms of sensitization profiles and clinical manifestations. Despite the complexity, a unique molecular, multiplex, and customized in-vitro IgE test detected relevant sensitization in all study centers. Nevertheless, this geographical diversity in pollen allergic patients imposes localized clinical guidelines and study protocols for clinical trials of SAR in this climatically complex region.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional , Adulto , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/diagnóstico , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/epidemiología , Inmunoglobulina E , Alérgenos , Polen , Pruebas Cutáneas , Fenotipo
2.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 38: 3946320231223004, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38217433

RESUMEN

The symptoms of celery allergy are mainly presented as oral allergy symptom, but there are several case reports of patients who experienced anaphylaxis. Defensin (Api g 7), as a novel allergen in celery root, was described in 2022 r. The female patient had a history of several episodes of dyspnea and cough, associated with ingestion of spice mixes containing dried celery. Up to the point of hospitalization, there were no objective tests, either sIgE or skin prick tests, that would confirm celery sensitization. During hospitalization, patient had a positive double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge with cooked celery. The patient was sensitized to mugwort defensin Art v 1. An inhibition assay with celery allergen extract was performed to prove cross-sensitization between Art v 1 and celery allergen responsible for symptoms in the patient. In conclusion, Api g 7 is an important celery allergen that can be responsible for severe reactions. Its cross-reactivity with Art v 1 is characteristic. Negative diagnostic tests with celery do not exclude Api g 7 sensitization.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Humanos , Femenino , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Polen , Proteínas de Plantas/efectos adversos , Alérgenos , Defensinas , Pruebas Cutáneas/efectos adversos
3.
Allergy ; 78(12): 3057-3076, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37815205

RESUMEN

This European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guideline provides recommendations for diagnosing IgE-mediated food allergy and was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Food allergy diagnosis starts with an allergy-focused clinical history followed by tests to determine IgE sensitization, such as serum allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) and skin prick test (SPT), and the basophil activation test (BAT), if available. Evidence for IgE sensitization should be sought for any suspected foods. The diagnosis of allergy to some foods, such as peanut and cashew nut, is well supported by SPT and serum sIgE, whereas there are less data and the performance of these tests is poorer for other foods, such as wheat and soya. The measurement of sIgE to allergen components such as Ara h 2 from peanut, Cor a 14 from hazelnut and Ana o 3 from cashew can be useful to further support the diagnosis, especially in pollen-sensitized individuals. BAT to peanut and sesame can be used additionally. The reference standard for food allergy diagnosis is the oral food challenge (OFC). OFC should be performed in equivocal cases. For practical reasons, open challenges are suitable in most cases. Reassessment of food allergic children with allergy tests and/or OFCs periodically over time will enable reintroduction of food into the diet in the case of spontaneous acquisition of oral tolerance.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Niño , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Pruebas Cutáneas , Inmunoglobulina E , Alérgenos , Polen
4.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37549949

RESUMEN

Objective:To investigate the distribution of allergens in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) in Ningxia, and provide theoretical data for the prevention and treatment of AR in this region. Methods:A total of 1664 patients diagnosed with AR in the Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Department of Yinchuan First People's Hospital Outpatient Clinic from January 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively collected. Use the allergen sIgE antibody detection kit (immunoblotting method) to detect inhalation and ingestion allergens in patients.Results: ①Among all AR patients, 1 158 cases were detected positive, resulting in the detection rate was 69.59%; ②The detection rate of inhalation allergen was 65.87%, and the detection rate of ingestion allergen was 19.83%; ③Mugwort was the most sensitive allergen, and 76.32% of the patients having a positive grade ≥3; ④Out of the patients, 294 cases (25.39%) were allergic to only one allergen, 244 cases (21.07%) were allergic to two allergens, and 620 cases (53.54%) were allergic to three or more allergens; ⑤During different seasons, the highest number of positive allergens detected was in the summer, with 968 cases (83.59%). Mugwort was the main allergen during this season (69.01%). After the COVID-19 epidemic, the total positive rate of sIgE tests in AR patients decreased compared to before, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001); ⑥Mugwort, dog epithelium, mold combination, egg, peanut, soybean, Marine fish combination and fruit combination all showed statistically significant differences between different gender groups (P<0.05); ⑦Common ragweed, mugwort, dust mite combination, cockroach, egg, milk, Marine fish combination, shrimp, fruit combination and nut combination all showed statistically significant differences among different age groups (P<0.05); ⑧There were statistically significant differences in hay dust among different ethnic groups (P<0.05). Conclusion:Artemisia argyi is the main allergen in Ningxia, and the distribution characteristics of different allergens are influenced by treatment season, the COVID-19 epidemic, gender, age, ethnicity, and other factors, showing certain distribution patterns and rules.


Asunto(s)
Artemisia , COVID-19 , Rinitis Alérgica , Alérgenos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pruebas Cutáneas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino
5.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 184(9): 875-881, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37402353

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Some grass species that are either common or widely spread in Thailand have not been used for pollen allergy diagnosis. In order to improve diagnostic accuracy, the aim of this pilot study was to identify the grass species responsible for pollen allergy in Thailand. METHODS: The skin sensitization of pollen extracts from six different grass species, including rice (Oryza sativa), corn (Zea mays), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), para grass (Urochloa mutica), ruzi grass (Urochloa eminii), and green panic grass (Megathyrsus maximus), was evaluated by skin prick test (SPT). Serum's IgE specific to each pollen extract was analyzed by Western blot (WB). The ImmunoCAPTM test for Johnson grass was also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the thirty-six volunteers who participated in this study, eighteen tested positive for at least one of the diagnostic tests, namely SPT, WB analysis, or ImmunoCAPTM. Notably, skin reactivity to para grass, corn, sorghum, and rice was more commonly observed compared to ruzi grass and green panic grass. However, in the WB analysis, individuals with pollen-specific IgE were more frequently detected in sorghum, green panic grass, corn, rice, and ruzi grass than para grass. CONCLUSION: In this pilot investigation, our findings indicate that the pollen extracts of rice, corn, sorghum, and para grass are associated with pollen allergy in Thailand. These results contribute to the current knowledge on the identification of grass species that are associated with pollen allergy in Thailand and Southeast Asia.


Asunto(s)
Oryza , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional , Humanos , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/diagnóstico , Proyectos Piloto , Alérgenos , Tailandia/epidemiología , Inmunoglobulina E , Pruebas Cutáneas/métodos , Extractos Vegetales , Poaceae
6.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37138402

RESUMEN

Objective:To investigate the sensitization characteristics of ragweed pollen in patients with allergic rhinitis(AR) and(or) allergic asthma in Beijing area, and to provide basis for the prevention and treatment of ragweed pollen sensitized population. Methods:Patients with allergic rhinitis and/or asthma from January 2017 to December 2019 in the outpatient department of Allergy Department of Beijing Shijitan Hospital were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Skin prick test(SPT) was performed with ragweed pollen allergen reagents to compare different ages, genders and respiratory diseases allergen distribution, and to observe the sensitization characteristics of its population. All of the analyses were performed using SAS software version 9.4. Results:A total of 9 727 patients were enrolled in the end. The total positive rate of ragweed pollen SPT was 45.50%(4 426/9 727), the highest positive rate was 65.54% in 13-17 years old group; The positive rate of ragweed pollen SPT was 49.79% in allergic rhinitis combined with asthma patients, followed by 46.46% in allergic rhinitis patients, and the lowest rate was 19.42% in single allergic asthma patients. There were more females than males in both ragweed pollen sensitized and non-ragweed pollen sensitized groups(P<0.05), and the proportion was higher in 30-39 years old than in other age groups(P<0.05). Ragweed pollen sensitization was higher than non-ragweed pollen sensitization in the allergic rhinitis group(98.49% vs 94.76%, P<0.05). Ragweed pollen with other summer and autumn pollen allergens in patients with positive SPT, the top three were Chenopodium pollen, Humulus pollen and Artemisia grandis pollen, with positive rates of 90.42%, 89.63% and 85.40%, respectively. Ragweed combined with other pollen sensitization accounted for 99.57%(4 407/4 426). Allergic rhinitis was the main disease in patients sensitized with ragweed pollen alone or combined with other pollens, and there was no significant difference between the two groups(94.97% vs 98.50%, P>0.05). Conclusion:Ragweed pollen is highly sensitized in Beijing area, single ragweed pollen sensitization is rare, often combined with multiple pollen sensitization, and allergic rhinitis is the main disease.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional , Rinitis Alérgica , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Alérgenos , Polen , Asma/epidemiología , Pruebas Cutáneas
7.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(2)2023 Jan 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36837427

RESUMEN

Allergic rhinitis is one of the most common health challenges and has a chronic and repetitive course that requires symptomatic treatment. We aimed to investigate the effect of phototherapy on allergic rhinitis and how long it takes to demonstrate treatment effect. Twenty-one patients who were diagnosed with allergic rhinitis using the skin prick test were enrolled. Red light (660 nm) and infrared light (940 nm) with a low power energy of 5 mW were used three times a day at intervals of at least 5 h. The Rhinoconjuntivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) and a visual analog scale (VAS) were used to measure the changes in symptoms. The median RQLQ and VAS scores before treatment were 62 (49-81.5) and 3 (2-5) points, respectively. The RQLQ score improved significantly at two and four weeks after treatment (52 [39-62.5]) and 46.0 [30.5-57.0], respectively). The VAS scores also improved significantly at two and four weeks after treatment. Nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea improved significantly at one week after the procedure. Low-power (5 mW) light irradiation (660 nm red light and 940 nm infrared) was effective in improving the symptoms of allergic rhinitis. In addition, symptom improvement became clear approximately a week after use. Further studies are required to reach a definitive conclusion.


Asunto(s)
Calidad de Vida , Rinitis Alérgica , Humanos , Fototerapia , Pruebas Cutáneas , Rinorrea
8.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 27(1): 103-109, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36647856

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Pollen-food allergy syndrome (PFAS) is an IgE-mediated allergic reaction to certain foods due to prior sensitization to pollen allergens. The data about the prevalence of PFAS in adults in Turkey is not sufficiently reported. Our objective was to investigate the frequency and clinical features of PFAS in adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 222 patients with SAR were enrolled in our outpatient allergy clinic at Hacettepe University, during a ten-month period. A questionnaire was used to evaluate patients and to categorize those who experienced obvious allergy symptoms consistent with PFAS. Atopy was assessed by a standard skin prick test panel including common aeroallergen extracts. RESULTS: Among 222 patients with a diagnosis of SAR, 31 had patient reported PFAS (31/222, 14%). Among them, 23 (74.2%) were females, and their mean age was 32.29±9.24 years. The most common symptoms were isolated oropharyngeal symptoms (58.1%), followed by urticaria (51.6%) after culprit food ingestion. The most frequent culprit foods were eggplant, walnut, kiwi, peach, and melon. The predominant sensitizing aeroallergen was grass pollen. CONCLUSIONS: PFAS can be frequently observed in adults who are followed up for SAR. The most frequently involved foods are eggplant, walnut, kiwi, peach, and melon in Ankara Province. The symptoms of PFAS are usually localized in the oropharyngeal area and are self-limited.


Asunto(s)
Fluorocarburos , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Masculino , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/diagnóstico , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiología , Polen/efectos adversos , Alérgenos , Síndrome , Pruebas Cutáneas
9.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 184(4): 366-369, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36599313

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Exposure to mosquitoes in the Tropics is perennial, and their somatic and saliva antigens have shown IgE binding capacity, although it is not clear whether this is due to cross-reactivity or primary sensitization. Inhalation of these allergens could trigger an allergic response. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of sensitization to Aedes aegypti in a group of patients with allergic rhinitis. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with allergic rhinitis subjects and healthy controls sensitized to mosquito extract was performed. Sensitization to mosquito and house dust mites was evaluated using skin prick test (SPT) and antibody determination by ELISA. Nasal provocation test (NPT) with whole-body extract was used to determine clinical relevance. RESULTS: Allergic rhinitis patients were more sensitized to mosquito extract than controls with (+) SPT (66.6% vs. 7.6%). From these (+) SPT patients, 44.5% had (+) NPT, and just two (11%) presented mono-sensitization to mosquito. Antibody reactivity was similar between patients and controls; however, (+) NPT patients showed a tendency to had higher levels of IgE and IgG4. DISCUSSION: Mosquitoes are perennial in most tropical areas, and their body allergens could be associated with respiratory allergies.


Asunto(s)
Aedes , Rinitis Alérgica , Animales , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Rinitis Alérgica/diagnóstico , Alérgenos , Pruebas de Provocación Nasal , Pruebas Cutáneas , Inmunoglobulina E , Extractos Vegetales
10.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 55(2): 86-93, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34296844

RESUMEN

Summary: Background. Lipid transfer proteins (LTP) are considered important plant food allergens in the Mediterranean area, but little is known about LTP allergy in pediatric age. Our aim was to characterize LTP allergy in children.Methods. We reviewed the clinical data from all children evaluated in our department with LTP allergy. From the 76 patients with LTP allergy, 26c hildren were included, 50% female, median age 10 years (1-17). Symptoms included urticaria in 58% (n = 15), anaphylaxis in 46% (n = 12) and OAS in 42% (n = 11). Results. Multiple reactions with different foods occurredin 69%. Cofactors were reported in 27% (n = 7). All patients had positive SPT to peach LTP extract and sIgE Pru p 3. No association between the occurrence of severe reactions and sIgE to Pru p 3 (p = 0.462), sIgE to Cor a 8(p = 0.896), SPT to peach LTP extract (p = 0.846) or the number of positive SPT to fruits/tree nuts (p = 0.972; p = 0.676) was found. Ninety-two percent of the patients tolerated fruits from Rosacea family without peel. Twelve percent reported reactions to new LTP containing foods during follow-up. LTP allergy can occur since early childhood. Conclusions. Since anaphylaxisis common and cofactors act as severity enhancers, it is fundamental to recognizeLTP allergy in children. Currently available diagnostic tests (SPT and sIgE) cannot accurately predict food tolerance or anticipate reaction severity.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Prunus persica , Humanos , Niño , Preescolar , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiología , Proteínas de Plantas , Antígenos de Plantas , Inmunoglobulina E/metabolismo , Alérgenos , Extractos Vegetales , Lípidos , Pruebas Cutáneas
11.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-982786

RESUMEN

Objective:To investigate the distribution of allergens in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) in Ningxia, and provide theoretical data for the prevention and treatment of AR in this region. Methods:A total of 1664 patients diagnosed with AR in the Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Department of Yinchuan First People's Hospital Outpatient Clinic from January 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively collected. Use the allergen sIgE antibody detection kit (immunoblotting method) to detect inhalation and ingestion allergens in patients.Results: ①Among all AR patients, 1 158 cases were detected positive, resulting in the detection rate was 69.59%; ②The detection rate of inhalation allergen was 65.87%, and the detection rate of ingestion allergen was 19.83%; ③Mugwort was the most sensitive allergen, and 76.32% of the patients having a positive grade ≥3; ④Out of the patients, 294 cases (25.39%) were allergic to only one allergen, 244 cases (21.07%) were allergic to two allergens, and 620 cases (53.54%) were allergic to three or more allergens; ⑤During different seasons, the highest number of positive allergens detected was in the summer, with 968 cases (83.59%). Mugwort was the main allergen during this season (69.01%). After the COVID-19 epidemic, the total positive rate of sIgE tests in AR patients decreased compared to before, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001); ⑥Mugwort, dog epithelium, mold combination, egg, peanut, soybean, Marine fish combination and fruit combination all showed statistically significant differences between different gender groups (P<0.05); ⑦Common ragweed, mugwort, dust mite combination, cockroach, egg, milk, Marine fish combination, shrimp, fruit combination and nut combination all showed statistically significant differences among different age groups (P<0.05); ⑧There were statistically significant differences in hay dust among different ethnic groups (P<0.05). Conclusion:Artemisia argyi is the main allergen in Ningxia, and the distribution characteristics of different allergens are influenced by treatment season, the COVID-19 epidemic, gender, age, ethnicity, and other factors, showing certain distribution patterns and rules.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Alérgenos , Artemisia , COVID-19 , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rinitis Alérgica , Pruebas Cutáneas
12.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-982753

RESUMEN

Objective:To investigate the sensitization characteristics of ragweed pollen in patients with allergic rhinitis(AR) and(or) allergic asthma in Beijing area, and to provide basis for the prevention and treatment of ragweed pollen sensitized population. Methods:Patients with allergic rhinitis and/or asthma from January 2017 to December 2019 in the outpatient department of Allergy Department of Beijing Shijitan Hospital were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Skin prick test(SPT) was performed with ragweed pollen allergen reagents to compare different ages, genders and respiratory diseases allergen distribution, and to observe the sensitization characteristics of its population. All of the analyses were performed using SAS software version 9.4. Results:A total of 9 727 patients were enrolled in the end. The total positive rate of ragweed pollen SPT was 45.50%(4 426/9 727), the highest positive rate was 65.54% in 13-17 years old group; The positive rate of ragweed pollen SPT was 49.79% in allergic rhinitis combined with asthma patients, followed by 46.46% in allergic rhinitis patients, and the lowest rate was 19.42% in single allergic asthma patients. There were more females than males in both ragweed pollen sensitized and non-ragweed pollen sensitized groups(P<0.05), and the proportion was higher in 30-39 years old than in other age groups(P<0.05). Ragweed pollen sensitization was higher than non-ragweed pollen sensitization in the allergic rhinitis group(98.49% vs 94.76%, P<0.05). Ragweed pollen with other summer and autumn pollen allergens in patients with positive SPT, the top three were Chenopodium pollen, Humulus pollen and Artemisia grandis pollen, with positive rates of 90.42%, 89.63% and 85.40%, respectively. Ragweed combined with other pollen sensitization accounted for 99.57%(4 407/4 426). Allergic rhinitis was the main disease in patients sensitized with ragweed pollen alone or combined with other pollens, and there was no significant difference between the two groups(94.97% vs 98.50%, P>0.05). Conclusion:Ragweed pollen is highly sensitized in Beijing area, single ragweed pollen sensitization is rare, often combined with multiple pollen sensitization, and allergic rhinitis is the main disease.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Alérgenos , Polen , Rinitis Alérgica , Asma/epidemiología , Pruebas Cutáneas
14.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 33(10): e13862, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36282135

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While the relationship between pollen and respiratory allergies is well-documented, the role of short-term pollen exposure in food allergy and eczema flares has not previously been explored. We aimed to investigate these associations in a population-based sample of children. METHODS: We investigated 1- (n = 1108) and 6-year-old (n = 675) children in the grass pollen season from the HealthNuts cohort. Grass pollen concentrations were considered on the day of testing (lag 0), up to three days before (lag 1-lag 3) and cumulatively (lag 0-3). Associations between grass pollen and food skin-prick test reactivity (SPT ≥ 2 mm at age 1 year and ≥ 3 mm at age 6 years), eczema flares, challenge-confirmed food allergy, reaction threshold to oral food challenges (OFC), and serum food-specific IgE levels were analyzed using either logistic or quantile regression models. Atopy and family history of allergic disease were considered as potent effect modifiers. RESULTS: Grass pollen at lag 0-3 (every 20 grains/m3 increase) was associated with an up to 1.2-fold increased odds of food SPT reactivity and eczema flares in 6-year-olds. In 1-year-olds, the associations were only observed for peanut in those with a family history of food allergy. Increasing grass pollen concentrations were associated with a lower reaction threshold to OFC and higher serum IgE levels in peanut-allergic 1-year-olds only. CONCLUSION: Increasing grass pollen concentration was associated with increased risk of food SPT reactivity and eczema flares in children. The associations in peanut-allergic infants may be related to immune activation and/or peanut and grass pollen cross-reactivity leading to a lower reaction threshold.


Asunto(s)
Eccema , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Niño , Lactante , Humanos , Alérgenos , Pruebas Cutáneas , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiología , Polen , Inmunoglobulina E , Eccema/epidemiología , Arachis , Poaceae/efectos adversos
15.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 52(9): 1018-1034, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35975576

RESUMEN

Pollen food syndrome (PFS) is a highly prevalent food allergy affecting pollen-sensitized children and adults. Sufferers experience allergic symptoms when consuming raw plant foods, due to the homology between the pollen allergens and unstable proteins in these foods. The triggers involved can vary depending on the pollen sensitization, which in turn is affected by geographical location. The British Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) Standards of Care Committee (SOCC) identified a need to develop a guideline for the diagnosis and management of PFS in the United Kingdom (UK). Guidelines produced by the BSACI use either the GRADE or SIGN methodology; due to a lack of high-quality evidence these recommendations were formulated using the SIGN guidelines, which is acknowledged to be less robust than the GRADE approach. The correct diagnosis of PFS ensures the avoidance of a misdiagnosis of a primary peanut or tree nut allergy or confusion with another plant food allergy to non-specific lipid transfer proteins. The characteristic foods involved, and rapid-onset oropharyngeal symptoms, mean PFS can often be diagnosed from the clinical history alone. However, reactions involving tree nuts, peanuts and soya milk or severe/atypical reactions to fruits and vegetables may require additional diagnostic tests. Management is through the exclusion of known trigger foods, which may appear to be simple, but is highly problematic if coupled with a pre-existing food allergy or for individuals following a vegetarian/vegan diet. Immunotherapy to pollens is not an effective treatment for PFS, and although oral or sublingual immunotherapy to foods seems more promising, large, controlled studies are needed. The typically mild symptoms of PFS can lead to an erroneous perception that this condition is always easily managed, but severe reactions can occur, and anxiety about the onset of symptoms to new foods can have a profound effect on quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional , Adulto , Alérgenos , Arachis , Niño , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/terapia , Frutas , Humanos , Polen , Calidad de Vida , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/diagnóstico , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/terapia , Pruebas Cutáneas , Síndrome , Reino Unido/epidemiología
16.
Laryngorhinootologie ; 101(8): 673-686, 2022 08.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35915906

RESUMEN

Allergic diseases are among the most common diseases worldwide. For appropriate management knowledge of the allergy trigger is crucial. The clinical picture of allergic diseases is diverse and correct diagnosis is often a challenge. The allergist needs to distinguish intolerances from allergies and infectious diseases from non-infectious triggers. Test results have to be interpreted accordingly to differentiate sensitizations from allergies. In this review current state of the art diagnostic measures to diagnose type I and type IV allergies are described and discussed.Immediate type allergies such as allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma and anaphylaxis are mediated by allergen-specific IgE antibodies detectable both in serum and tissue. Typical triggers are pollen, mites, animal epithelia, food, insect toxins and pharmaceuticals. In everyday practice, diagnostics are based on three complementary pillars: the allergy-specific anamnesis as a prerequisite of correct interpretation of subsequent diagnostic tests like skin testing and serological immunoglobulin detection. These can be supplemented as required and available by provocation tests to prove clinical reactivity and cellular assays to demonstrate the cellular immune response.Type IV allergic reactions are mediated by T cells causing contact allergy with a local eczematous reaction with a latency of several hours to days. Some 3,500 triggers, often from occupational environment, are known; e. g., nickel, chromium, cobalt, fragrances, rubber, plastics, preservatives, dyes, neomycin, benzocaine, sulfonamides, quinidine, wool wax, perubalsam, eye therapeutics, light filter substances, disinfectants, pesticides, technical oils or plants. Diagnosis of contact allergy combines the history of cutaneous exposure with associated symptoms and patch testing, with detection of a late phase clinical reaction after 6 to 48, up to a maximum of 96 hours after antigen contact.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Alérgenos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Alimentos , Humanos , Pruebas Cutáneas/efectos adversos
17.
Expert Rev Clin Immunol ; 18(10): 1015-1022, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35912836

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cannabis is the most widely consumed illicit drug in the world and carries a risk of severe IgE-mediated allergic reactions, requiring appropriate diagnostic management. Currently available diagnostics are still relatively limited and require careful interpretation of results to avoid harmful over- and underdiagnosis. AREAS COVERED: This review focuses on the most up-to-date understandings of cannabis allergy diagnosis, starting with the main clinical features of the disease and the allergenic characteristics of Cannabis sativa, and then providing insights into in vivo, in vitro, and ex vivo diagnostic tests. EXPERT OPINION: At present, the diagnosis of IgE-mediated cannabis allergy is based on a three-step approach that starts with accurate history taking and ends with a confirmation of sensitization to the whole extract and, finally, molecular components. Although much has been discovered since its first description in 1971, the diagnosis of cannabis allergy still has many unmet needs. The lack of commercial standardized and validated extracts and in vitro assays makes a harmonized workup of cannabis allergy difficult. Furthermore, the epidemiological characteristics, and clinical implications of sensitization to different molecular components are not yet fully known. Future research will complete the picture and likely result in an individualized and standardized approach.


Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Hipersensibilidad , Drogas Ilícitas , Alérgenos , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Inmunoglobulina E , Extractos Vegetales , Pruebas Cutáneas
18.
Int J Mol Sci ; 23(13)2022 Jun 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35805992

RESUMEN

Diagnosis of type I hypersensitivity reactions (IgE-mediated reactions) to penicillins is based on clinical history, skin tests (STs), and drug provocation tests (DPTs). Among in vitro complementary tests, the fluoro-enzyme immunoassay (FEIA) ImmunoCAP® (Thermo-Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) is the most widely used commercial method for detecting drug-specific IgE (sIgE). In this study, we aimed to analyze the utility of ImmunoCAP® for detecting sIgE to penicillin G (PG) and amoxicillin (AX) in patients with confirmed penicillin allergy. The study includes 139 and 250 patients evaluated in Spain and Italy, respectively. All had experienced type I hypersensitivity reactions to penicillins confirmed by positive STs. Additionally, selective or cross-reactive reactions were confirmed by DPTs in a subgroup of patients for further analysis. Positive ImmunoCAP® results were 39.6% for PG and/or AX in Spanish subjects and 52.4% in Italian subjects. When only PG or AX sIgE where analyzed, the percentages were 15.1% and 30.4%, respectively, in Spanish patients; and 38.9% and 46% in Italian ones. The analysis of positive STs showed a statistically significant higher percentage of positive STs to PG determinants in Italian patients. False-positive results to PG (16%) were detected in selective AX patients with confirmed PG tolerance. Low and variable sensitivity values observed in a well-defined population with confirmed allergy diagnosis, as well as false-positive results to PG, suggest that ImmunoCAP® is a diagnostic tool with relevant limitations in the evaluation of subjects with type I hypersensitivity reactions to penicillins.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Amoxicilina , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Técnicas para Inmunoenzimas , Inmunoglobulina E/análisis , Penicilina G , Penicilinas/efectos adversos , Pruebas Cutáneas
19.
Arerugi ; 71(5): 389-396, 2022.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35831164

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is reportedly a difference in the diameter of the skin reaction induced by different types of skin prick test (SPT) devices. We compared the SPT diagnostic accuracy and wheal size between a Bifurcated Needle® (BN) and SmartPractice® Prick Lancet (PL), which are commercially available in Japan. METHODS: An SPT was performed on 15 adults with and 10 without subjective symptoms of cedar pollinosis who wished to be examined for Japanese cedar pollen (JCP) sensitization. The SPT was performed blindly with a BN or PL with 10mg/ml of histamine dihydrochloride, 50% glycerosaline control, and JCP extract solution (TORII PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Tokyo, Japan). The wheal sizes induced by the BN and PL were then compared. The JCP-specific IgE antibody titer was measured to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the SPT. RESULTS: Histamine wheal diameters were 6.0 (5.5-6.5) mm by BN and 6.0 (5.5-6.5) mm by PL (p=0.67), and none of the negative control solutions induced wheal. The respective sensitivity and specificity for cedar sensitization were 100% and 86% for BN, 100% and 79% for PL, and the areas under the ROC curve were 0.72 and 0.69 (p=0.32). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of cedar pollen extract based on specific IgE-JCP sensitization and the diameter of the wheal produced by a BN and PL were considered equivalent.


Asunto(s)
Rinitis Alérgica Estacional , Urticaria , Adulto , Alérgenos , Histamina , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E , Extractos Vegetales , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/diagnóstico , Pruebas Cutáneas
20.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35527439

RESUMEN

Objective: To analyze the characteristics of allergen spectrum in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) in Xinjiang area in recent 13 years. Methods: The skin prick test (SPT) results of 5 019 AR patients from 2007 to 2019 were retrospectively summarized, and 14 allergens of different age, gender and race were analyzed. Results: The distribution of 14 allergens was significantly different in different years, the difference was significant (P<0.05). The top three positive rates of 14 allergens were quinoa 48.2% (2 398/4 970), plantain 33.3% (1 221/3 667), and Artemisia 33.1% (1 647/4 974). There was no significant difference in the positive rate of dog epithelium between different genders and ages (χ²=0.041, P>0.05; χ²=3.8, P>0.05), the difference of other allergen in positive rates was statistically significant (all P<0.05). The positive rates of Alternaria Alternata (χ²=7.3), Penicillium Sp. (χ²=0.3), Cat Epithelium (χ²=3.1), Dust Mite (χ²=1.4), Acaroid Mite (χ²=0.5) and Cockroach (χ²=2.9) had no significant difference among different races (all P>0.05). The positive rates of other eight allergens including Artemisia Vulgaris (χ²=64.9), Chenopodium (χ²=204.1), Artemisiifolia (χ²=72.4), Plantain (χ²=87.8), Phleum Pratense L(χ²=55.4), Robinia Pseudoacacia (χ²=67.8), Canis Familiari (χ²=70.8), Dog Epithelium (χ²=15.7) were significantly different among different races (all P<0.05). Conclusion: The distribution of allergens in Xinjiang area changes with time, the main allergens are mainly herbaceous, and the distribution of allergens in patients with AR is different in gender, age and race.


Asunto(s)
Artemisia , Rinitis Alérgica , Alérgenos , Animales , Perros , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pyroglyphidae , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pruebas Cutáneas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA