RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Percentage of positive cores involved on a systemic prostate biopsy has been established as a risk factor for adverse oncologic outcomes and is a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) independent parameter for unfavorable intermediate-risk disease. Most data from a radiation standpoint was published in an era of conventional fractionation. We explore whether the higher biological dose delivered with SBRT can mitigate this risk factor. METHODS: A large single institutional database was interrogated to identify all patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) treated with 5-fraction SBRT without ADT. Pathology results were reviewed to determine detailed core involvement as well as Gleason score (GS). High-volume biopsy core involvement was defined as ≥ 50%. Weighted Gleason core involvement was reviewed, giving higher weight to higher-grade cancer. The PSA kinetics and oncologic outcomes were analyzed for association with core involvement. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2018, 1590 patients were identified who underwent SBRT for localized PCa. High-volume core involvement was a relatively rare event observed in 19% of our cohort, which was observed more in patients with small prostates (p < 0.0001) and/or intermediate-risk disease (p = 0.005). Higher PSA nadir was observed in those patients with low-volume core involvement within the intermediate-risk cohort (p = 0.004), which was confirmed when core involvement was analyzed as a continuous variable weighted by Gleason score (p = 0.049). High-volume core involvement was not associated with biochemical progression (p = 0.234). CONCLUSIONS: With a median follow-up of over 4 years, biochemical progression was not associated with pretreatment high-volume core involvement for patients treated with 5-fraction SBRT alone. In the era of prostate SBRT and MRI-directed prostate biopsies, the use of high-volume core involvement as an independent predictor of unfavorable intermediate risk disease should be revisited.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radiocirugia , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , BiopsiaRESUMEN
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is one of the surgical alternatives for drug-resistant essential tremor (ET). Here, we aimed at evaluating whether biologically effective dose (BEDGy2.47) is relevant for tremor improvement after stereotactic radiosurgical thalamotomy in a population of patients treated with one (unplugged) isocenter and a uniform dose of 130 Gy. This is a retrospective longitudinal single center study. Seventy-eight consecutive patients were clinically analyzed. Mean age was 69.1 years (median 71, range 36-88). Mean follow-up period was 14 months (median 12, 3-36). Tremor improvement was assessed at 12 months after SRS using the ET rating assessment scale (TETRAS, continuous outcome) and binary (binary outcome). BED was defined for an alpha/beta of 2.47, based upon previous studies considering such a value for the normal brain. Mean BED was 4573.1 Gy2.47 (median 4612, 4022.1-4944.7). Mean beam-on time was 64.7 min (median 61.4; 46.8-98.5). There was a statically significant correlation between delta (follow-up minus baseline) in TETRAS (total) with BED (p = 0.04; beta coefficient - 0.029) and beam-on time (p = 0.03; beta coefficient 0.57) but also between TETRAS (ADL) with BED (p = 0.02; beta coefficient 0.038) and beam-on time (p = 0.01; beta coefficient 0.71). Fractional polynomial multivariate regression suggested that a BED > 4600 Gy2.47 and a beam-on time > 70 min did not further increase clinical efficacy (binary outcome). Adverse radiation events (ARE) were defined as larger MR signature on 1-year follow-up MRI and were present in 7 out of 78 (8.9%) cases, receiving a mean BED of 4650 Gy2.47 (median 4650, range 4466-4894). They were clinically relevant with transient hemiparesis in 5 (6.4%) patients, all with BED values higher than 4500 Gy2.47. Tremor improvement was correlated with BED Gy2.47 after SRS for drug-resistant ET. An optimal BED value for tremor improvement was 4300-4500 Gy2.47. ARE appeared for a BED of more than 4500 Gy2.47. Such finding should be validated in larger cohorts.
Asunto(s)
Temblor Esencial , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Anciano , Temblor/etiología , Temblor/cirugía , Temblor Esencial/cirugía , Temblor Esencial/etiología , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tálamo/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: DESTROY-4 (DOSE-ESCALATION STUDY OF STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY) was a Phase I trial aimed to evaluate the safety and the feasibility of escalating doses of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on MRI-defined Dominant Intraprostatic Lesion (DIL) in low- and intermediate-risk pCa patients using a simultaneous integrated boost-volumetric arc therapy (SIB-VMAT) technique. METHODS: Eligible patients included those with low- and intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma (NCCN risk classes) and an International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) ≤â¯15. No restriction about DIL and prostate volumes was set. Pretreatment preparation required an enema and the placement of intraprostatic gold fiducials. SBRT was delivered in five consecutive daily fractions. For the first three patients, the DIL radiation dose was set at 8â¯Gy per fraction up to a total dose of 40â¯Gy (PTV1) and was gradually increased in succeeding cohorts to total doses of 42.5â¯Gy, 45.0â¯Gy, 47.5â¯Gy, and finally, 50.0â¯Gy, while keeping the prescription of 35â¯Gy/7â¯Gy per fraction for the entire prostate gland. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or worse gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity occurring within 90 days of follow-up (Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events scale 4.0). Patients completed quality-of-life questionnaires at defined intervals. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with a median age of 75 (range, 58-89) years were enrolled. The median follow-up was 26.3 months (8.9-84 months). 66.7% of patients were classified as intermediate-risk groups, while the others were low-risk groups, according to the NCCN guidelines. Enrolled patients were treated as follows: 8 patients (40â¯Gy), 5 patients (42.5â¯Gy), 4 patients (45â¯Gy), 4 patients (47.5â¯Gy), and 3 patients (50â¯Gy). No severe acute toxicities were observed. G1 and G2 acute GU toxicities occurred in 4 (16%) and 3 patients (12.5%), respectively. Two patients (8.3%) and 3 patients (12.5%) experienced G1 and G2 GI toxicities, respectively. Since no DLTs were observed, 50â¯Gy in five fractions was considered the MTD. The median nadir PSA was 0.20â¯ng/mL. A slight improvement in QoL values was registered after the treatment. CONCLUSION: This trial confirms the feasibility and safety of a total SIB-VMAT dose of 35â¯Gy on the whole gland and 50â¯Gy on DIL in 5 fractions daily administered in a well-selected low- and intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma population. A phase II study is ongoing to confirm the tolerability of the schedule and assess the efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radiocirugia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Calidad de Vida , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common central nervous system malignancy in adults. Despite decades of developments in surgical management, radiation treatment, chemotherapy, and tumor treating field therapy, GBM remains an ultimately fatal disease. There is currently no definitive standard of care for patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) following failure of initial management. OBJECTIVE: In this retrospective cohort study, we set out to examine the relative effects of bevacizumab and Gamma Knife radiosurgery on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with GBM at first-recurrence. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with rGBM who underwent treatment with bevacizumab and/or Gamma Knife radiosurgery at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2012 and 2022. Mean PFS and OS were determined for each of our three treatment groups: Bevacizumab Only, Bevacizumab Plus Gamma Knife, and Gamma Knife Only. RESULTS: Patients in the combined treatment group demonstrated longer post-recurrence median PFS (7.7 months) and median OS (11.5 months) compared to glioblastoma patients previously reported in the literature, and showed improvements in total PFS (p=0.015), total OS (p=0.0050), post-recurrence PFS (p=0.018), and post-recurrence OS (p=0.0082) compared to patients who received either bevacizumab or Gamma Knife as monotherapy. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the combined use of bevacizumab with concurrent stereotactic radiosurgery can have improve survival in patients with rGBM.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioblastoma , Radiocirugia , Adulto , Humanos , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Glioblastoma/radioterapia , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: New fractionation schedules with modern tools are a very rapidly developing area in curative radiotherapy (RT) for early prostate cancer (PC). To apply these techniques in everyday clinical practice, we planned this phase II trial with different fractionation schedules and followed up patients using careful health-related quality of life (QoL) questionnaires for three years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three PC patients with one or two intermediate PC risk factors according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria were recruited. Forty-two patients were treated with 78/2 Gy (conventional fractionation, CF) or 60/3 Gy (moderately hypofractionation RT, MHF), and 31 patients were treated with 36.25/7.25 Gy (stereotactic body RT, SBRT). Their PSA levels were measured, and QoL data were assessed for genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI), and sexual well-being between the baseline and three years after treatment. A Rectafix™ (RF) fixation device was used in 30 patients in the CF/MHF group. RESULTS: Three years after radiotherapy (RT), there were no differences between the groups regarding GU, GI, sexual well-being, PSA response, or clinical outcomes. On QoL questionnaires, men in the SBRT group were more satisfied with their QoL at the end of RT. Urinary symptoms (p=0.004) and urinary incontinence were more common in the CF/MHF group (p=0.016) three months after RT. The use of RF reduced GI toxicity, especially urgency (p=0.002), at three years after RT. CONCLUSION: Modern, short, five-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy as a local curative treatment for PC is well tolerated and safe. Our novel results showing a decrease in GI toxicity using Rectafix™ fixation should be confirmed in future randomized trials.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radiocirugia , Masculino , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/complicaciones , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/etiologíaRESUMEN
Deep-seated unruptured AVMs located in the thalamus, basal ganglia, or brainstem have a higher risk of hemorrhage compared to superficial AVMs and surgical resection is more challenging. Our systematic review and meta-analysis provide a comprehensive summary of the stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) outcomes for deep-seated AVMs. This study follows the guidelines set forth by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement. We conducted a systematic search in December 2022 for all reports of deep-seated arteriovenous malformations treated with SRS. Thirty-four studies (2508 patients) were included. The mean obliteration rate in brainstem AVM was 67% (95% CI: 0.60-0.73), with significant inter-study heterogeneity (tau2 = 0.0113, I2 = 67%, chi2 = 55.33, df = 16, p-value < 0.01). The mean obliteration rate in basal ganglia/thalamus AVM was 65% (95% CI: 0.58-0.72) with significant inter-study heterogeneity (tau2 = 0.0150, I2 = 78%, chi2 = 81.79, df = 15, p-value < 0.01). The presence of deep draining veins (p-value: 0.02) and marginal radiation dose (p-value: 0.04) were positively correlated with obliteration rate in brainstem AVMs. The mean incidence of hemorrhage after treatment was 7% for the brainstem and 9% for basal ganglia/thalamus AVMs (95% CI: 0.05-0.09 and 95% CI: 0.05-0.12, respectively). The meta-regression analysis demonstrated a significant positive correlation (p-value < 0.001) between post-operative hemorrhagic events and several factors, including ruptured lesion, previous surgery, and Ponce C classification in basal ganglia/thalamus AVMs. The present study found that radiosurgery appears to be a safe and effective modality in treating brainstem, thalamus, and basal ganglia AVMs, as evidenced by satisfactory rates of lesion obliteration and post-surgical hemorrhage.
Asunto(s)
Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios de Seguimiento , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/radioterapia , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/cirugía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Ganglios Basales/cirugía , Tronco Encefálico/cirugía , Tálamo/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Focused ultrasound (FUS-T) and stereotactic radiosurgery thalamotomy (SRS-T) targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus are effective incisionless surgeries for essential tremor (ET). However, their efficacy for tremor reduction and, importantly, adverse event incidence have not been directly compared. OBJECTIVE: To present a comprehensive systematic review with network meta-analysis examining both efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of FUS-T vs SRS-T for treating medically refractory ET. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, using the PubMed and Embase databases. We included all primary FUS-T/SRS-T studies with approximately 1-year follow-up, with unilateral Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale or Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor scores prethalamotomy/post-thalamotomy and/or AEs. The primary efficacy outcome was Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale A+B score reduction. AEs were reported as an estimated incidence. RESULTS: Fifteen studies of 464 patients and 3 studies of 62 patients met inclusion criteria for FUS-T/SRS-T efficacy comparison, respectively. Network meta-analysis demonstrated similar tremor reduction between modalities (absolute tremor reduction: FUS-T: -11.6 (95% CI: -13.3, -9.9); SRS-T: -10.3 (95% CI: -14.2, -6.0). FUS-T had a greater 1-year adverse event rate, particularly imbalance and gait disturbances (10.5%) and sensory disturbances (8.3%). Contralateral hemiparesis (2.7%) often accompanied by speech impairment (2.4%) were most common after SRS-T. There was no correlation between efficacy and lesion volume. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review found similar efficacy between FUS-T and SRS-T for ET, with trend toward higher efficacy yet greater adverse event incidence with FUS-T. Smaller lesion volumes could mitigate FUS-T off-target effects for greater safety.
Asunto(s)
Temblor Esencial , Radiocirugia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ultrasónicos , Humanos , Temblor Esencial/cirugía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Tálamo/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Temblor/cirugía , Metaanálisis en RedRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The rates of local failure after curative radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PC) remain high despite more accurate locoregional treatments available, with one third of patients experiencing biochemical failure and clinical relapse occurring in 30-47% of cases. Today, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the treatment of choice in this setting, but with not negligible toxicity and low effects on local disease. Therefore, the treatment of intraprostatic PC recurrence represents a challenge for radiation oncologists. Prostate reirradiation (Re-I) might be a therapeutic possibility. We present our series of patients treated with salvage stereotactic ReI for intraprostatic recurrence of PC after radical radiotherapy, with the aim of evaluating feasibility and safety of linac-based prostate ReI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated toxicities and outcomes of patients who underwent salvage reirradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for intraprostatic PC recurrence. Inclusion criteria were ageâ¯≥ 18 years, histologically proven diagnosis of PC, salvage ReI for intraprostatic recurrence after primary radiotherapy for PC with curative intent, concurrent/adjuvant ADT with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allowed, performance status ECOG 0-2, restaging choline/PSMA-PET/TC and prostate MRI after biochemical recurrence, and signed informed consent. RESULTS: From January 2019 to April 2022, 20 patients were recruited. Median follow-up was 26.7 months (range 7-50). After SBRT, no patients were lost at follow-up and all are still alive. One- and 2year progression free survival (PFS) was 100% and 81.5%, respectively, while 2year biochemical progression-free survival (bFFS) was 88.9%. Four patients (20%) experienced locoregional lymph node progression and were treated with a further course of SBRT. Prostate reirradiation allowed the ADT start to be postponed for 12-39 months. ReI was well tolerated by all patients and none discontinued the treatment. No cases of ≥â¯G3 genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were reported. Seven (35%) and 2 (10%) patients experienced acute G1 and G2 GU toxicity, respectively. Late GU toxicity was recorded in 10 (50%) patients, including 8 (40%) G1 and 2 (10%) G2. ADT-related side effects were found in 7 patients (hot flashes and asthenia). CONCLUSION: Linac-based SBRT is a safe technique for performing ReI for intraprostatic recurrence after primary curative radiotherapy for PC. Future prospective, randomized studies are desirable to better understand the effectiveness of reirradiation and the still open questions in this field.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radiocirugia , Reirradiación , Masculino , Humanos , Adolescente , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Próstata/efectos de la radiación , Reirradiación/efectos adversos , Reirradiación/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Terapia Recuperativa/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Increased oxygen levels may enhance the radiosensitivity of brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This project administered hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) prior to SRS to assess feasibility, safety, and response. METHODS: 38 patients were studied, 19 with 25 brain metastases treated with HBO prior to SRS, and 19 historical controls with 27 metastases, matched for histology, GPA, resection status, and lesion size. Outcomes included time from HBO to SRS, quality-of-life (QOL) measures, local control, distant (brain) metastases, radionecrosis, and overall survival. RESULTS: The average time from HBO chamber to SRS beam-on was 8.3 ± 1.7 minutes. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were comparable between HBO and control patients; no grade III or IV serious AEs were observed. Radionecrosis-free survival (RNFS), radionecrosis-free survival before whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) (RNBWFS), local recurrence-free survival before WBRT (LRBWFS), distant recurrence-free survival before WBRT (DRBWFS), and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different for HBO patients and controls on Kaplan-Meier analysis, though at 1-year estimated survival rates trended in favor of SRS + HBO: RNFS - 83% vs 60%; RNBWFS - 78% vs 60%; LRBWFS - 95% vs 78%; DRBWFS - 61% vs 57%; and OS - 73% vs 56%. Multivariate Cox models indicated no significant association between HBO treatment and hazards of RN, local or distant recurrence, or mortality; however, these did show statistically significant associations (p < 0.05) for: local recurrence with higher volume, radionecrosis with tumor resection, overall survival with resection, and overall survival with higher GPA. CONCLUSION: Addition of HBO to SRS for brain metastases is feasible without evident decrement in radiation necrosis and other clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Traumatismos por Radiación , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Irradiación Craneana , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , OxígenoRESUMEN
Rationale: Approximately a quarter of patients with early stage lung cancer are not medically fit for lobectomy. Limited resection and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have emerged as alternatives for these patients. Given the equipoise on the effectiveness of the two treatments, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) could have a significant impact on patients' decision-making and treatment outcomes. Objectives: To compare the AE profile between SBRT versus limited resection. Methods: Data were derived from a prospective cohort of patients with stage I-IIA non-small cell lung cancer who were deemed as high-risk for lobectomy recruited from five centers across the United States. Propensity scores and inverse probability weighting were used to compare the rates of 30- and 90-day AEs among patients treated with limited resection versus SBRT. Results: Overall, 65% of 252 patients underwent SBRT. After adjusting for propensity scores, there was no significant difference in developing at least one AE comparing SBRT to limited resection (odds ratio [OR]: 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.55 and OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.84-1.91 at 30 and 90 days, respectively). SBRT was associated with lower risk of infectious AEs than limited resection at 30 days (OR: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.01-0.39) and 90 days posttreatment (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.17-0.98). Additionally, SBRT was associated with persistently elevated risk of fatigue (OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.34-4.54 at 30 days and OR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.52-4.77 at 90 days, respectively), but significantly lower risks of respiratory AEs (OR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.20-0.65 and OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.31-0.86 at 30 and 90 days, respectively). Conclusions: Though equivalent in developing at least one AE, we found that SBRT is associated with less toxicity than limited resection in terms of infectious and respiratory AEs but higher rates of fatigue that persisted up to 3 months posttreatment. This information, combined with data about oncologic effectiveness, can help patients' decision-making regarding these alternative therapies.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Resultado del Tratamiento , FatigaRESUMEN
AIMS: Although the results on acute and late toxicity of ultrahypofractionation are encouraging, data on safety in prostate cancer patients with a medical history of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or adenomectomy remain scarce, especially in cases of repeated procedures. The aim of the present study was to report on long-term toxicities after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of prostate cancer patients with previous surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 150 patients treated with SBRT (median dose 36.25 Gy in five fractions) realised from 2014 to 2019 in a single-centre institution, data of 24 men with a history of TURP (n = 19) or adenomectomy (n = 5) were analysed. Repeated TURP was carried out in three patients, with a median time between surgery and SBRT of 54 months. Genitourinary toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 grading scale. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 45 months, 10 of 24 (42%) patients experienced at least one episode of transient haematuria. One patient (4%) with three previous TURP presented a grade 3 acute non-infective cystitis. Late grade 2 and 3 genitourinary toxicities were observed in eight (33%) and four patients (17%) (two treated with adenomectomy, one with multiple TURP and one with a 140 cm3 prostate size), respectively, with no grade ≥4 adverse events. A complete recovery of grade 3 genitourinary toxicities was observed for all patients after hyperbaric oxygen therapy. CONCLUSION: Prostate SBRT is feasible and well-tolerated in patients with a medical history of surgical treatments of benign hyperplasia. Patients with prior adenomectomy or multiple TURP are at higher risk of developing severe genitourinary toxicity and should be carefully evaluated before SBRT treatments.
Asunto(s)
Hiperplasia Prostática , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radiocirugia , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Hematuria/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Hiperplasia Prostática/etiología , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Cyberknife robotic radiosurgery (RRS) provides single-session high-dose radiotherapy of brain tumors with a steep dose gradient and precise real-time image-guided motion correction. Although RRS appears to cause more radiation necrosis (RN), the radiometabolic changes after RRS have not been fully clarified. 18F-FET-PET/CT is used to differentiate recurrent tumor (RT) from RN after radiosurgery when MRI findings are indecisive. We explored the usefulness of dynamic parameters derived from 18F-FET PET in differentiating RT from RN after Cyberknife treatment in a single-center study population. METHODS: We retrospectively identified brain tumor patients with static and dynamic 18F-FET-PET/CT for suspected RN after Cyberknife. Static (tumor-to-background ratio) and dynamic PET parameters (time-activity curve, time-to-peak) were quantified. Analyses were performed for all lesions taken together (TOTAL) and for brain metastases only (METS). Diagnostic accuracy of PET parameters (using mean tumor-to-background ratio >1.95 and time-to-peak of 20 min for RT as cut-offs) and their respective improvement of diagnostic probability were analyzed. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with 28 brain tumors were included in quantitative analysis. Time-activity curves alone provided the highest sensitivities (TOTAL: 95%, METS: 100%) at the cost of specificity (TOTAL: 50%, METS: 57%). Combined mean tumor-to-background ratio and time-activity curve had the highest specificities (TOTAL: 63%, METS: 71%) and led to the highest increase in diagnosis probability of up to 16% p. - versus 5% p. when only static parameters were used. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study shows that combined dynamic and static 18F-FET PET/CT parameters can be used in differentiating RT from RN after RRS.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Traumatismos por Radiación , Radiocirugia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Radioisótopos de Flúor , Humanos , Necrosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Necrosis/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , TirosinaRESUMEN
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): To report results from our phase II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivering 36 Gy in 4 fractions for patients with localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS/METHODS: We enrolled 55 patients treated with SBRT delivering 36 Gy in 4 fractions between 2015 to 2018. All patients were categorized as low-risk (n = 4), intermediate-risk (n = 31) or high-risk (n = 20) according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. Median age was 73 years (range 54-86 years). Two-thirds of patients (n = 37) had received androgen-deprivation therapy for 3-46 months (median, 31 months). Median duration of follow-up was 36 months (range 1-54 months). We used Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria version 4 for toxicity assessments. Quality of life (QOL) outcomes were also evaluated using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC). RESULTS: Protocol treatments were completed for all patients. Six patients experienced biochemical failures. Among these six patients, three patients experienced clinical failure. One patient showed bone metastasis before biochemical failure. One patient died of gastric cancer. The 3-year biochemical control rate was 89.8%. Acute grade 2 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were observed in 5 patients (9%) and 6 patients (11%), respectively. No grade 3 or higher acute toxicities were observed. Late grade 2 GU and GI toxicities were observed in 7 patients (13%) and 4 patients (7%), respectively. Late grade 3 GU and GI toxicities were observed in 1 patient (1.8%) each. EPIC scores decreased slightly during the acute phase and recovered within 3 months after treatment. CONCLUSION: Our phase II study showed that SBRT delivering 36 Gy in 4 fractions was safe and effective with favorable QOL outcomes, although this regimen showed slightly more severe toxicities compared to current standards.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radiocirugia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antagonistas de Andrógenos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Sistema UrogenitalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is paucity of investigations into immunotherapy or targeted therapy for postoperative locally recurrent pancreatic cancer. We aimed to assess the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plus pembrolizumab and trametinib in these patients. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study, participants were recruited from Changhai Hospital affiliated to the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma characterised by mutant KRAS and positive immunohistochemical staining of PD-L1, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and documented local recurrence after surgery followed by chemotherapy (mFOLFIRINOX [ie, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and folinic acid] or 5-fluorouracil). Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive voice or web response system, without stratification, to receive SBRT with doses ranging from 35-40 Gy in five fractions, intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks, and oral trametinib 2 mg once daily or SBRT (same regimen) and intravenous gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) on day 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle for eight cycles until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population in all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02704156, and is now complete. FINDINGS: Between Oct 10, 2016, and Oct 28, 2017, 198 patients were screened, of whom 170 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive SBRT plus pembrolizumab and trametinib (n=85) or SBRT plus gemcitabine (n=85). As of the clinical cutoff date (Nov 30, 2020), median follow-up was 13·1 months (IQR 10·2-17·1). Median overall survival was 14·9 months (12·7-17·1) with SBRT plus pembrolizumab and trametinib and 12·8 months (95% CI 11·2-14·4) with SBRT plus gemcitabine (hazard ratio [HR] 0·69 [95% CI 0·51-0·95]; p=0·021). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse effects were increased alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase (ten [12%] of 85 in SBRT plus pembrolizumab and trametinib group vs six [7%] of 85 in SBRT plus gemcitabine group), increased blood bilirubin (four [5%] vs none), neutropenia (one [1%] vs nine [11%]), and thrombocytopenia (one [1%] vs four [5%]). Serious adverse events were reported by 19 (22%) participants in the SBRT plus pembrolizumab and trametinib group and 12 (14%) in the SBRT plus gemcitabine group. No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: The combination of SBRT plus pembrolizumab and trametinib could be a novel treatment option for patients with locally recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgery. Phase 3 trials are needed to confirm our findings. FUNDING: Shanghai Shenkang Center and Changhai Hospital. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Radiocirugia , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , China , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Fluorouracilo , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Piridonas , Pirimidinonas , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Gemcitabina , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
There have been no previous reports of chronic encapsulated expanding hematoma after Gamma Knife thalamotomy. The present case underwent Gamma Knife thalamotomy for essential tremor at the age of 78 years. Three- and 12-month posttreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed small T2 high-intensity lesions on the target and along with the internal capsule. Hemiparesis developed 17 months after the treatment. Twenty months post treatment, T2-MRI showed a hypointense mass across the target and internal capsule. Gradual expansion of the mass was confirmed on MRI at 26-38 months. A 54-month posttreatment MRI showed marked expansion of the mass with multiple cysts surrounded by a T2-hypointense rim. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-MRI showed partial enhancement of the mass. MRI findings suggested a radiation-induced cavernoma. Hemiparesis, dysesthesia, and pain on the right side of the body persisted even after steroid therapy for several months. Long-term careful observation is necessary after Gamma Knife thalamotomy.
Asunto(s)
Temblor Esencial , Radiocirugia , Anciano , Temblor Esencial/patología , Temblor Esencial/cirugía , Hematoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Hematoma/etiología , Hematoma/cirugía , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Tálamo/diagnóstico por imagen , Tálamo/patología , Tálamo/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether a more widely accessible, noninvasive, frameless approach to radiosurgical thalamotomy would improve objective measures of refractory essential or parkinsonian tremor without added toxicity compared with reports of frame-based radiosurgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a single-arm pilot observational prospective trial of adult patients with essential or parkinsonian tremor from 2013 to 2019 and report results at 1-year follow-up. Patients were treated with frameless unilateral radiosurgical ablation of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus to a maximum dose of 160 Gy. Treatment response was measured by the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) tremor rating scale and the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor or Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire obtained before treatment and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients, including 23 with essential tremor and 10 with Parkinson's disease, were enrolled. Overall treatment response rate per FTM was 83% (15 of 18) at 6 months. There was a marked improvement in tremor, with an average total FTM reduction of 21% at 3 months (from 46 to 30 points; Pâ¯=â¯.003) and 41% at 6 months (from 46 to 24 points; Pâ¯=â¯.001). At 6 months, functional decline had regressed by 54% (from 15 to 7 points; Pâ¯=â¯.001). Quality of life improved by 57% (Pâ¯=â¯.001) at 6 months in patients with essential tremor, and patients with Parkinson's disease had unchanged quality of life. At 1-year follow-up, grade 2 neurologic adverse events were observed in 6% (2 of 33) of patients without any grade ≥ 3 events. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive, frameless radiosurgical thalamotomy may be a feasible treatment for patients with refractory tremor and demonstrates short-term safety at 1-year follow-up. This pilot study provides promising preliminary descriptions of efficacy, and definitive estimates of long-term safety and benefit require further study with longer follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Radiocirugia , Tálamo , Temblor , Adulto , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Tálamo/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Temblor/radioterapiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a recognized treatment for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions the most commonly used regimen. We explored the preliminary efficacy, patient recorded toxicity, and decision regret in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer receiving SBRT with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided focal gross tumor volume boost to 45 Gy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between July 2015 and June 2019, 120 patients received SBRT across 2 institutions with a uniform protocol. All patients had fiducial markers and hydrogel, MRI and PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) scan. All patients received a questionnaire asking the degree of urinary, bowel, and sexual bother experienced at set time points, including questions about treatment choice and decision regret. RESULTS: One hundred twelve of 120 patients consented. Their median age was 72 years and median follow-up was 2.3 years. As per National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, 78% had intermediate risk and 20% high risk. Androgen deprivation was combined with radiation in 6 patients. Most patients (74%) reported that receiving SBRT significantly influenced their choice of treatment. Five men (4%) expressed "quite a lot" (n = 4) or "very much" regret (n = 1) regarding their choice of treatment, while 89% expressed "no regret." Similar to pretreatment levels, "quite a lot" or "very much" urinary or bowel bother was expressed in 8% and 6% of patients, respectively. Two patients experienced nadir +2 biochemical failure, both found to have bone metastases. A third patient underwent PSMA PET at nadir +1.7 and had disease at the penile bulb, which was out of field. Three year estimated freedom from biochemical failure was 99% for intermediate and 85% for high-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated promising efficacy and low toxicity with PSMA/MRI-guided SBRT focal boost. Less than 5% of patients expressed significant decision regret for their choice of treatment.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radiocirugia , Anciano , Antagonistas de Andrógenos , Emociones , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Radiation therapy is a cornerstone of brain metastasis (BrM) management but carries the risk of radiation necrosis (RN), which can require resection for palliation or diagnosis. We sought to determine the relationship between extent of resection (EOR) of pathologically-confirmed RN and postoperative radiographic and symptomatic outcomes. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was performed at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center to identify all surgically-resected, previously-irradiated necrotic BrM without admixed recurrent malignancy from 2003 to 2018. Clinical, pathologic and radiographic parameters were collected. Volumetric analysis determined EOR and longitudinally evaluated perilesional T2-FLAIR signal preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-months postoperatively when available. Rates of time to 50% T2-FLAIR reduction was calculated using cumulative incidence in the competing risks setting with last follow-up and death as competing events. The Spearman method was used to calculate correlation coefficients, and continuous variables for T2-FLAIR signal change, including EOR, were compared across groups. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were included. Most underwent prior stereotactic radiosurgery with or without whole-brain irradiation (N = 42, 91%). Twenty-seven operations resulted in gross-total resection (59%; GTR). For the full cohort, T2-FLAIR edema decreased by a mean of 78% by 6 months postoperatively that was durable to last follow-up (p < 0.05). EOR correlated with edema reduction at last follow-up, with significantly greater T2-FLAIR reduction with GTR versus subtotal resection (p < 0.05). Among surviving patients, a significant proportion were able to decrease their steroid use: steroid-dependency decreased from 54% preoperatively to 15% at 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: RN resection conferred both durable T2-FLAIR reduction, which correlated with EOR; and reduced steroid dependency.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Traumatismos por Radiación , Radiocirugia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Edema , Humanos , Necrosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Necrosis/etiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
In this brief report, we describe the case of a previously healthy 51-year gentleman who was treated with stereotactic radiosurgery to a dose of 12 Gy to a small right-sided vestibular schwannoma. MRI of the brain performed after treatment revealed stable treated disease but subsequently, the patient developed symptomatic COVID-19 based on PCR along with multiple cranial neurologic deficits, including right facial paralysis, hemifacial anesthesia, and anesthesia of the ipsilateral hard palate and tongue. MRI of the brain was repeated and demonstrated radiation necrosis in the adjacent brainstem for which he was treated with Pentoxifylline and Vitamin E, dexamethasone, and Bevacizumab with only partial improvement. The dose-volume metrics of the brainstem from his radiotherapy plan as well as the trajectory of his imaging findings do not match this clinical picture from radiotherapy alone. We review the basic pathogenesis of the inflammatory response to infection from the SARS-CoV-2 virus as well as the pathogenesis of radiation necrosis. Heightened awareness about potential risks with high-dose radiotherapy in patients with symptomatic COVID-19 should be considered.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Masculino , Necrosis , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Ultra-high single-dose radiotherapy (SDRT) represents a potential alternative to curative extreme hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in organ-confined prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE: To compare toxic effect profiles, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses, and quality-of-life end points of SDRT vs extreme hypofractionated SBRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The PROSINT single-institution phase 2 randomized clinical trial accrued, between September 2015 and January 2017, 30 participants with intermediate-risk prostate cancer to receive SDRT or extreme hypofractionated SBRT. Androgen deprivation therapy was not permitted. Data were analyzed from March to May 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 5 × 9 Gy SBRT (control arm) or 24 Gy SDRT (test arm). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was toxic effects; the secondary end points were PSA response, PSA relapse-free survival, and patient-reported quality of life measured with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 30 men were randomized; median (interquartile range) age was 66.3 (61.2-69.9) and 73.6 (64.7-75.9) years for the SBRT and SDRT arms, respectively. Time to appearance and duration of acute and late toxic effects were similar in the 2 trial arms. Cumulative late actuarial urinary toxic effects did not differ for grade 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 90% CI, 0.13-1.27) and grade 2 or greater (HR, 1.07; 90% CI, 0.21-5.57). Actuarial grade 1 late gastrointestinal (GI) toxic effects were comparable (HR, 0.37; 90% CI, 0.07-1.94) and there were no grade 2 or greater late GI toxic effects. Declines in PSA level to less than 0.5 ng/mL occurred by 36 months in both study arms. No PSA relapses occurred in favorable intermediate-risk disease, while in the unfavorable category, the actuarial 4-year PSA relapse-free survival values were 75.0% vs 64.0% (HR, 0.76; 90% CI, 0.17-3.31) for SBRT vs SDRT, respectively. The EPIC-26 median summary scores for the genitourinary and GI domains dropped transiently at 1 month and returned to pretreatment scores by 3 months in both arms. The IPSS-derived transient late urinary flare symptoms occurred at 9 to 18 months in 20% (90% CI, 3%-37%) of patients receiving SDRT. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial among patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer, SDRT was safe and associated with low toxicity, and the tumor control and quality-of-life end points closely match the SBRT arm outcomes. Further studies are encouraged to explore indications for SDRT in the cure of prostate cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02570919.