Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 31
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Altern Ther Health Med ; 30(1): 441-445, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37820680

RESUMEN

Objective: To compare the difference in the effectiveness of ranibizumab (LU) and aflibercept (AF) in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods: Ninety-four patients with DR admitted to Sunshine Union Hospital from August 2020 to February 2022 were selected for the study and were divided into LU group (n = 47) and AF group (n = 47) according to the random number table method. Both groups underwent 25G vitrectomy in our hospital, with LU injected into the vitreous before surgery in the LU group and AF in the AF group. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) in the pre-and post-injection atrial water were compared between the two groups, and the operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and the occurrence of medically induced fissures were recorded in both groups. In addition, the expression of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Central Macular Thickness (CMT), and inflammatory factors were compared before and after surgery. Finally, patients were counted for adverse reactions and prognosis of DR recurrence during treatment. Results: After injection, VEGF decreased and PEDF increased in both groups (P < .001). There were no differences in operative time (P = .604), intraoperative bleeding rate (P = .694), the incidence of medically induced fissure (P = .557), BCVA [P = .665 (T0), P > .999 (T1), P = .727 (T2)], and CMT [P = .688 (T0), P = .065 (T1), P = .148 (T2)] between the two groups, while IL-6, IL-8, and MMP-9 were lower in the AF group than in the LU group at 2 months after surgery (P < .001). Finally, there was no difference between both groups in terms of adverse effects and prognosis of DR recurrence rate (P = 1.000, .478). Conclusion: Both vitreous cavity injections of LU and AF can effectively reduce the expression of vascular-related factors in the atrial fluid of DR patients, but AF has a more significant inhibitory effect on the level of inflammatory factors in patients in the short term after treatment.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Retinopatía Diabética , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión , Humanos , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Retinopatía Diabética/inducido químicamente , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Altern Ther Health Med ; 29(8): 412-417, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37632971

RESUMEN

Objective: To analyze the efficacy of laser panretinal photocoagulation in combination with Lucentis treatment on patients with retinal arterial macroaneurysm and investigate more effective novel therapy options to treat retinal arterial macroaneurysm. Method: This study was conducted in the Pediatric department of Chongqing Aier Hospital between October 2016 and October 2020, and a total of 62 inpatients were enrolled for the study. Patients were randomly organized into two groups, an 'observation group' with patients receiving combinational treatment of laser panretinal photocoagulation and Lucentis, and a 'control group' with patients treated by only laser panretinal photocoagulation, were allotted. Though a comparative statistical analysis, the clinical outcomes and adverse effects on both groups, including their best corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness, intraocular pressure, and required number of laser treatments before and after treatments, were investigated. Also prognosis associated factors for patient's visual function, were analyzed. Results: The clinical efficacy of the combinational treatment of laser panretinal photocoagulation and Lucentis was better than single laser panretinal photocoagulation treatment, accompanied by decreased incidence of adverse reactions (P < .05). For a combinational treatment, the observation group showed improved best corrected visual acuity and reduced central macular thickness and intraocular pressure, including fewer laser treatments (P < .05). Also, a better prognostic quality of life score; (measured as physical function, mental state, visual function, and social activity ability of patients), was observed for a combinational treatment than that of laser panretinal photocoagulation treatment (P < .05). Conclusion: Laser panretinal photocoagulation combined with lucentis can deliver with reduced incidence of adverse effects compared to laser panretinal photocoagulation treatment and hence can more effectively contribute to retinal rehabilitation of patients with retinal arterial macroaneurysm.


Asunto(s)
Retinopatía Diabética , Macroaneurisma Arterial de Retina , Niño , Humanos , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Retinopatía Diabética/cirugía , Coagulación con Láser , Rayos Láser , Calidad de Vida , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Macroaneurisma Arterial de Retina/tratamiento farmacológico , Agudeza Visual
3.
Retina ; 43(6): 999-1004, 2023 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36696603

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We examined the effect of ranibizumab with or without laser photocoagulation on retinal sensitivity in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: Prospective randomized control study. Thirty patients with branch retinal vein occlusion received intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in a monthly pro re nata regimen. Fifteen patients received ranibizumab monotherapy alone (monotherapy group). The remaining 15 patients received rescue laser therapy at 3 or 9 months (combined group). The retinal sensitivity was measured at 32 points within central 8°, and the average of the main occlusion side among the 16 upper or 16 lower points was defined as the affected area sensitivity. RESULTS: In comparing the monotherapy group and the combined group, the number of injections during the 12 months was 5.4 versus 4.9, the change in retinal thickness ( µ m) was -254 versus -197, the ETDRS letters of improvement was +18.3 versus +19.6, and the change in the affected area sensitivity (dB) was +7.1 versus +4.6. At 12 months, all these results were significantly improved compared with their respective baselines, but none of the differences between the two groups reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Retinal sensitivity at 12 months improved in both the monotherapy group and the combined group. The additional laser did not reduce the number of injections or further improve visual acuity nor did it affect retinal sensitivity.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Edema Macular , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana , Humanos , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/diagnóstico , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Estudios Prospectivos , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Coagulación con Láser/métodos , Retina , Rayos Láser
4.
Surv Ophthalmol ; 68(2): 147-174, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36436614

RESUMEN

Intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment has drastically improved the visual and anatomical outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME); however, success is not always guaranteed, and a proportion of these eyes demonstrate persistent DME (pDME) despite intensive treatment. While standardized criteria to define these treatment-resistant eyes have not yet been established, many studies refer to eyes with no clinical response or an unsatisfactory partial response as having pDME. A patient is considered to have pDME if the retinal thickness improves less than 10-25% after 6 months of treatment. A range of treatment options have been recommended for eyes with pDME, including switching anti-VEGF agents, using corticosteroids and/or antioxidant drugs in adjunct with anti-VEGF therapy, and vitrectomy. In addition, multimodal imaging of DME eyes may be advantageous in predicting the responsiveness to treatment; this is beneficial when initiating alternative therapies. We explore the literature on persistent DME regarding its defining criteria, incidence, the baseline biological markers that may be useful in anticipating the response to treatment, and the available treatment options.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Retinopatía Diabética , Edema Macular , Humanos , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Edema Macular/epidemiología , Retinopatía Diabética/diagnóstico , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Retinopatía Diabética/epidemiología , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Inyecciones Intravítreas
5.
Am J Case Rep ; 23: e937739, 2022 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36316964

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND We present the report of the first case, to the best of our knowledge, of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) that occurred 3 days after anticoagulation discontinuation in a patient with a history of pulmonary embolism in the course of COVID-19. CASE REPORT A previously healthy 38-year-old man was hospitalized in April 2021 with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, complicated by segmental and subsegmental pulmonary embolism. The patient was treated with a concurrent combination of remdesivir, dexamethasone, therapeutic enoxaparin, ceftriaxone, passive oxygen therapy, and convalescent plasma therapy, which led to pulmonary improvement. The treatment with therapeutic enoxaparin (80 mg/0.8 mL twice a day) was continued for 1 month after discharge, followed by 15 mg of rivaroxaban twice a day for 3 weeks and 20 mg of rivaroxaban once a day for 11 weeks. Within 3 days after rivaroxaban discontinuation, the patient experienced a decrease in visual acuity in his right eye, to the level of 5/25. Nonischemic CRVO with cystoid macular edema was diagnosed and an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab was performed. Common identifiable factors contributing to CRVO were excluded, and the treatment with prophylactic enoxaparin was initiated. Two weeks later, macular edema decreased significantly and visual acuity improved to 20/20. The treatment with enoxaparin was discontinued. CONCLUSIONS Rebound hypercoagulability after discontinuation of rivaroxaban therapy can manifest as CRVO in a young patient with a history of COVID-19 pulmonary embolism. It was successfully treated with an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Edema Macular , Embolia Pulmonar , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/complicaciones , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/tratamiento farmacológico , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/diagnóstico , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Enoxaparina/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Edema Macular/etiología , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Embolia Pulmonar/complicaciones , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Sueroterapia para COVID-19
6.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(39): e30877, 2022 Sep 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36181067

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This work aimed to determine and compare plasma and vitreous selenium (Se) concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: A total of 60 type-2-diabetes patients including 20 without DR, 20 with non-proliferative DR (NPDR), and 20 with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), were involved in this study. Blood plasma samples were collected from above 60 patients and 20 normal controls (without diabetes). Twenty control vitreous samples were obtained from the eyes presenting a macular hole and epimacular membrane. Vitreous samples were also collected from PDR patients receiving one-week intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy or not. Plasma and vitreous Se concentrations were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Plasma Se concentrations in PDR patients (163.74 ±â€…32.68 µg/L) were significantly higher than those in normal control patients (121.59 ±â€…28.33 µg/L), NPDR patients (130.34 ±â€…29.11 µg/L), and the patients without DR (81.23 ±â€…20.59 µg/L) (all P < .001). Similarly, Se concentrations in vitreous samples of PDR patients (56.30 ±â€…12.03 µg/L) were consistently higher than those in control vitreous samples (26.26 ±â€…6.53 µg/L). In addition, vitreous Se concentrations in PDR patients decreased to 47.76 ±â€…9.72 µg/L after intravitreal injection of the anti-VEGF drug ranibizumab for one week, which was significantly lower than those before injection (P = .02). Plasma VEGF levels of diabetic patients were lower than those of the normal controls (P < .001). On the contrary, the vitreous VEGF level in the PDR group (913.61 ±â€…193.32 pg/mL) was significantly higher than that of the normal control group (101.23 ±â€…21.33 pg/mL) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The elevation of Se concentrations may be an important risk factor in plasma and vitreous with diabetic retinopathy among type-2-diabetes patients. The elevated VEGF may be also closely related to the intraocular Se concentration in PDR patients.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Retinopatía Diabética , Selenio , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Humanos , Plasma , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Selenio/uso terapéutico , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Vitrectomía , Cuerpo Vítreo
7.
PLoS One ; 17(8): e0272301, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35951503

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: (1) To investigate the relative importance of convenience (consultation frequency and injection frequency) against treatment outcomes (visual and anatomical outcomes) and out-of-pocket medical costs via a discrete choice experiment (DCE), and (2) to investigate how patient characteristics affect patient treatment preferences. METHODS: Eligibility criteria were: (1) receiving a neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) diagnosis; (2) receiving anti-VEGF treatment; (3) being ≥21 years old, and (4) being able to speak and understand English/Mandarin. Patients were presented with eight choice tasks and asked to choose between their current treatment and two hypothetical treatments that varied by six attributes: number of clinic visits in a year, number of injections in a year, vision quality, control of swelling in retina, drug labelling and out-of-pocket cost. RESULTS: This analysis involved 180 patients. Based on latent class logistic regressions, vision quality was the most important attribute (34%) followed by cost (24%). The frequency of total clinic visits (15%) was the third most-important attribute, closely followed by labelling (12%) and control of retina swelling (11%). Injection frequency was the least important attribute (4%). CONCLUSIONS: Vision quality was the most important attribute followed by the out-of-pocket costs. Given the same outcomes, patients preferred treatment regimens which require fewer total clinic visits. In comparison, injection frequency alone did not influence patient preferences. With increasing treatment options for nAMD, understanding patients' preferences can help clinicians in selecting agents and treatment regimen most preferred for each patient, which may lead to improved long-term adherence and outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular , Prioridad del Paciente , Adulto , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Adulto Joven
9.
Arq. bras. oftalmol ; Arq. bras. oftalmol;83(6): 552-561, Nov.-Dec. 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1153080

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Age-related macular degeneration is the leading cause of vision loss in elderly individuals, as well as a medical and socio-economic challenge. The treatment of dry age-related macular degeneration is based on vitamin supplementation. New treatment studies are focused on preventing the progression of degeneration and repopulating the atrophic macula. Recently, research on the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration experienced a breakthrough with the advent of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. Nevertheless, despite the fact that ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab are effective in reducing severe visual impairment, patients usually lose some vision over time. Therefore, the search for new therapies and diagnostic methods is fundamentally important. Current studies are focused on new anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, antibody against sphingosine-1-phosphate, anti-platelet-derived growth factor, gene therapy, and RNA interference. The results of ongoing clinical studies may improve the therapy of age-related macular degeneration.


RESUMO Degeneração macular relacionada à idade (DMRI) é a principal causa de perda de visão em pessoas idosas. É também um desafio médico e socioeconômico. O tratamento da degeneração macular relacionada à idade seca baseia-se na suplementação vitamínica. Novos tratamentos estão focados na prevenção da progressão da degeneração e tentativas de repovoar a mácula atrófica. A degeneração macular relacionada à idade neovascular experimentou um grande avanço com o advento dos inibidores do fator de crescimento endotelial anti-vascular (anti-VEGF); no entanto, apesar do ranibizumab, aflibercept e bevacizumab serem eficazes na redução do comprometimento visual grave, os pacientes geralmente per­dem visão ao longo do tempo. Portanto, a busca por novas terapias, tratamentos e diagnósticos é de fundamental importância. Os estudos estão focados em novos fármacos sobre fator de crescimento endotelial anti-vascular, inibidores nucleosideos da transcriptase reversa, anticorpos contra esfingosina-1-fosfato, fator de crescimento derivado de plaquetas, terapia genética e RNA de interferência. A terapia para degeneração macular relacionada à idade está prestes a melhorar como resultado desses estudos clínicos em andamento.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Degeneración Macular , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Agudeza Visual , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico
10.
J Int Med Res ; 48(9): 300060520931618, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32962487

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of ranibizumab plus fufang xueshuantong capsule (cFXST) with the efficacy of ranibizumab alone in treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, controlled, pilot study included 38 eyes from 38 patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) that were randomly allocated into two cohorts of 19 eyes each: ranibizumab (Cr) and ranibizumab plus cFXST (Cfr). All patients received three monthly injections of ranibizumab. Patients in Cfr also received daily oral supplementation of cFXST. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and thickness of the choroidal neovascularization-pigment epithelial detachment (CNV-PED) complex (measured by optical coherence tomography) were recorded at baseline and at 1 and 3 months after the first intravitreal injection of ranibizumab. RESULTS: In the Cfr, the CNV-PED complex thickness was reduced by 31.7% and 36.1% at 1 and 3 months, respectively; these reductions were significantly greater than the 19.7% and 24.2% reductions in the Cr. BCVA improvement was significantly greater in the Cfr than in the Cr after 3 months; the proportion of patients with functional response was also greater in the Cfr than in the Cr (16/16 vs. 8/17). CONCLUSION: Oral cFXST increases the efficacy of short-term ranibizumab treatment for exudative AMD.


Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular , Ranibizumab , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza Visual
11.
Arq Bras Oftalmol ; 83(6): 552-561, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32785436

RESUMEN

Age-related macular degeneration is the leading cause of vision loss in elderly individuals, as well as a medical and socio-economic challenge. The treatment of dry age-related macular degeneration is based on vitamin supplementation. New treatment studies are focused on preventing the progression of degeneration and repopulating the atrophic macula. Recently, research on the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration experienced a breakthrough with the advent of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. Nevertheless, despite the fact that ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab are effective in reducing severe visual impairment, patients usually lose some vision over time. Therefore, the search for new therapies and diagnostic methods is fundamentally important. Current studies are focused on new anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, antibody against sphingosine-1-phosphate, anti-platelet-derived growth factor, gene therapy, and RNA interference. The results of ongoing clinical studies may improve the therapy of age-related macular degeneration.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Degeneración Macular , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Agudeza Visual
12.
PLoS One ; 15(6): e0234739, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32555630

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and treatment patterns of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in treatment-naïve patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) enrolled in the LUMINOUS™ study. STUDY DESIGN: A 5-year, global, prospective, multicenter, observational, open-label study conducted in a clinical practice (real-world) setting at outpatient ophthalmology clinics that recruited 30,138 consenting adult patients from all approved indications for ranibizumab across 42 countries. Patients with BRVO were treated according to the local ranibizumab label of the participating countries. Mean change in visual acuity (VA) in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters from baseline to Year 1, treatment exposure during Year 1, and adverse events (AEs) over 5 years were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 1366 recruited BRVO patients, 405 were treatment-naïve at baseline with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 67.9 (12.5) years, 57.5% were female, and 71.8% were White. At Year 1 (n = 189), the mean (SD) VA gain was 11.9 (17.66) letters from a baseline of 49.2 (±20.32) letters with a mean (SD) of 5.0 (2.34) injections. VA gains were higher in patients (n = 83) who received 6-9 injections (13.6 [20.16] letters) than in those who received 2-5 injections (n = 92, 11.7 [15.43] letters), or 1 injection (n = 14, 3.6 [13.72] letters). Patients with baseline VA <23 letters had numerically highest VA gains (n = 20, 31.1 [24.48] letters). Over 5 years, the rate of ocular/non-ocular AEs was 7.4%/9.1% and serious AEs was 0.3%/4.4% in treatment-naïve BRVO patients (n = 405). CONCLUSIONS: One year results from the LUMINOUS real-world study showed a clinically meaningful VA improvement with ranibizumab in treatment-naïve patients with BRVO; numerically higher VA gains were achieved in patients who received more injections and those with poor baseline VA. No new safety signals were observed.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Conjuntivitis/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Presión Intraocular , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Ranibizumab/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza Visual
13.
J Chin Med Assoc ; 82(8): 659-664, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31259835

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of blindness worldwide, for which intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the primary treatment option. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the prioritization of anti-VEGF agents for wet AMD under the National Health Insurance (NHI) Program, and their clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with active choroidal neovascularization caused by AMD, and who met the criteria for reimbursement for anti-VEGF therapy by the NHI program in Taiwan between August 1, 2014 and May 31, 2015, were included in the study. Factors potentially influencing the choice of treatment agent were analyzed, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two different agents and their protocols. RESULTS: A total of 166 treatment applications in 166 eyes from 159 patients were enrolled in the study. Age, laterality, presence of retinal pigment epithelial detachment, history of hypertension, coronary artery disease, and cerebral vascular accidents were significantly associated with the selection of the anti-VEGF agent. Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes were similar between the patients treated with ranibizumab and those treated with aflibercept. Significantly fewer injections were given during the follow-up period in those treated with aflibercept. CONCLUSION: Under the restrictive insurance program in Taiwan, more patients and ophthalmologists chose to treat wet AMD using aflibercept. However, in clinical practice, no significant differences in efficacy or clinical outcomes were found between the patients treated with ranibizumab and those treated with aflibercept.


Asunto(s)
Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taiwán
14.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 208: 206-210, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30905726

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the outcomes of patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treated with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) using a telemedicine system. DESIGN: Interventional case series. METHODS: This study examined all patients with exudative AMD who were receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections from September 1, 2015, through August 31, 2017, using electronic consultations at a single academic center and health system. Patients were managed initially by a retinal specialist and then allowed to receive further care with their local ophthalmologist. There were 200 electronic consultations placed during this time period for 83 eyes of 59 patients. Data collected included the retina specialist's recommendations: intravitreal agent, interval between injections, number of injections, and when the patient was to follow-up. All occurrences of recommendations that were not completed were reported. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients at the time of electronic consultations was 82.3 ± 7.3 years with a mean follow-up time of 2.4 ± 0.81 years. The mean distance from the home of the patient to the retina specialist was 70 ± 44 miles. There were 14 consultations (7.1%) that did not comply with the recommendations of the retina specialist. Most of these were due to other medical comorbidities leading to missed appointments or scheduling errors. CONCLUSIONS: In an integrated health care setting, 59 patients with exudative AMD were identified who were able to be effectively managed using a telemedicine system. In the appropriate setting, telemedicine may be able to assist in the management of patients with wet AMD.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Telemedicina/métodos , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Exudados y Transudados , Femenino , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Agudeza Visual , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/fisiopatología
15.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(13): e14516, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30921177

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Omega-3 and ranibizumab (O3R) has been reported to treat age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) effectively. However, up to the present, no systematic review specifically addressed the efficacy of O3R for the treatment of ARMD. Therefore, in this study, we will propose to assess the efficacy and safety of O3R for the treatment of ARMD. METHODS: We will search PUMBED, EMBASE, CINAHI, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Information, Wanfang Data, as well as the gray literature from inception up to the present. We will accept randomized controlled trials for assessing the efficacy and safety of O3R for ARMD. The primary outcomes include change in best corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness. The secondary outcomes consist of changes in subfoveal choroidal thickness, macular atrophy, retinal average sensitivity, contrast sensitivity, glare disability, and quality of life. In addition, incidence and severity of adverse events will also be evaluated. Cochrane Collaboration tool will be used to assess the risk of bias for each included study. In addition, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool will be utilized to assess the overall strength of the evidence. Two authors will independently carry out all procedures and any divergences will be solved through discussion with a third author. If it is possible, we will conduct meta-analysis and subgroup analysis concerning different interventions, risk of bias, and outcome measurements. RESULTS: In this proposed study, we outline details of the aims and methods of efficacy and safety of O3R for the treatment of ARMD. CONCLUSION: The findings of this systematic review will summarize current evidence of O3R for the treatment of patients with ARMD. DISSEMINATION AND ETHICS: The results of the present study are expected to be published by peer-reviewed journals. This is a literature-based study. Thus, ethical approval is unnecessary for this study. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019121177.


Asunto(s)
Ácidos Grasos Omega-3 , Degeneración Macular , Ranibizumab , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Grasos Omega-3/administración & dosificación , Ácidos Grasos Omega-3/efectos adversos , Ácidos Grasos Omega-3/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular/epidemiología , Degeneración Macular/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Ranibizumab/administración & dosificación , Ranibizumab/efectos adversos , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza Visual/efectos de los fármacos , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto
16.
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther ; 35(3): 161-167, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30668279

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We compared the efficacies of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal conbercept (IVC) as the adjuvant pretreatments for vitrectomy with silicone oil infusion for tractional retinal detachment (TRD) secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 74 patients (79 eyes) who underwent vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade for diabetic TRD. They received IVC (37 eyes) or IVR (42 eyes) at standard doses 3-5 days preoperatively and were followed up for ∼6 months. Anatomic success rate, intra- and postoperative complications, and visual outcomes were compared between both groups. RESULTS: Initial (IVC vs. IVR: 97% vs. 98%) and final anatomic success rates (100% in each group) and mean visual acuity changes were not significantly different (P = 0.46). Intraoperative complications [iatrogenic retinal breaks (P = 0.58) and intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.66)], postoperative complications [fibrin formation (P = 0.51), postoperative preretinal bleeding (P = 0.88), progressing or persistent neovascular glaucoma (P = 0.63), progressive fibrovascular proliferation (P = 0.93), and recurrent retinal detachment (P = 0.93)], and surgical variables [surgical time (P = 0.53)] were similar between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Conbercept and ranibizumab are equally effective surgical adjuvants for vitrectomy with silicone oil infusion in patients with diabetic TRD.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Desprendimiento de Retina/tratamiento farmacológico , Aceites de Silicona/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Retinopatía Diabética/cirugía , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ranibizumab/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/administración & dosificación , Desprendimiento de Retina/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Vitrectomía
17.
J Tradit Chin Med ; 39(6): 892-901, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32186161

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Chinese medicine formula Huangban Bianxing One decoction (HBOD) combined with ranibizumab for treating exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients. METHODS: Totally 75 cases with exudative AMD (75 eyes) were enrolled in this study and randomly divided into two groups to receive either HBOD with ranibizumab or only ranibizumab. Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) letters for the best corrected visual acuity, center macular thickness (CMT), height of the lesion, fundus hemorrhage area, fundus fluorescein leakage area as the main outcomes and safety indexes were estimated and compared before and after treatment for 3 or 6 months. RESULTS: Comparing with the before treatment, ETDRS letter scores of both groups after treatment at month 3 obtained a greater improvement (P < 0.05), but the significant improvement only existed in the HBOD+ranibizumab group at month 6 (P < 0.01), and better than the ranibizumab group (P < 0.05). At month 3, the CMT and lesion height of both groups were significantly lower than those before treatment (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05) and the HBOD + ranibizumab group had a similar result at month 6 (P < 0.01). The hemorrhage area and fluorescein leakage area of the HBOD+ranibizumab group were also significantly reduced and also smaller than those of the ranibizumab group at month 6 (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05). During treatment, no significant adverse events relating to HBOD or ranibizumab treatment were elucidated. CONCLUSION: HBOD combined with ranibizumab can improve visual acuity and reduce hemorrhage and fluorescein leakage of patients with exudative AMD. These results also indicated that HBOD may function as an effective and safe adjuvant drug for exudative AMD.


Asunto(s)
Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/uso terapéutico , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ranibizumab/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza Visual/efectos de los fármacos
18.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 103(10): 1361-1366, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30573498

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to estimate the nationwide incidence of clinically diagnosed exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and associated use of ranibizumab and aflibercept in South Korea. METHODS: In this retrospective, population-based cohort study, claims data for 2010-2015 were analysed in a randomly selected sample of 519 661 adults aged ≥40 years. The incidence per 10 000 person-years was estimated, along with the 95% CI. Incident exudative AMD was defined based on the registration code for rare intractable diseases. Use of ranibizumab and aflibercept and the incidence of exudative AMD were recorded. RESULTS: Nine hundred and twelve patients were newly diagnosed with exudative AMD in 2010-2015. The 6-year incidence in the general population aged ≥40 years was 2.9 (95% CI 2.8 to 3.0) per 10 000 person-years. The incidence was highest in individuals aged 75-79 years (12.0, 95% CI 10.3 to 13.8). The incidence was higher in men than in women in all age groups. Six hundred and twenty-five (69%) of the 912 newly diagnosed patients started ranibizumab or aflibercept as a first-line treatment. The average number of injections administered was 6.1 (SD 3.9; minimum of 1 injection and maximum government-supported limit of 14) during 2010-2015; the number increased with increasing government funding support (from 5 to 10 and from 10 to 14 in 2013 and 2014, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the incidence of exudative AMD in South Korea and its treatment under the national health insurance system in this country. Its findings could be used for reference purposes and be useful when planning treatment for exudative AMD.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Exudados y Transudados , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico
19.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg ; 34(4): e129-e131, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29870439

RESUMEN

The authors report a 26-year-old medical device saleswoman developing choroidal neovascularization after injury by intense pulsed light with detection and monitoring by optical coherence tomography angiography and treatment with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab. This is the first intense pulsed light-related choroidal neovascularization case, which reminds the importance of using appropriate eye protection throughout the course of treatment for all individuals present in the therapy room.


Asunto(s)
Neovascularización Coroidal/etiología , Tratamiento de Luz Pulsada Intensa/efectos adversos , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Adulto , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico
20.
PLoS One ; 13(5): e0197670, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29772018

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The discussion on the use of bevacizumab is still ongoing and often doctors are deterred from using bevacizumab due to legal or political issues. Bevacizumab is an effective, safe and inexpensive treatment option for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), albeit unregistered for the disease. Therefore, in some countries ophthalmologists use the equally effective but expensive drugs ranibizumab and aflibercept. We describe the economic consequences of this dilemma surrounding AMD treatment from a societal perspective. METHODS: We modelled cost-effectiveness of treatment with ranibizumab (as-needed), aflibercept (bimonthly) and bevacizumab (as-needed). Effectiveness was estimated by systematic review and meta-analysis. The drug with the most favourable cost-effectiveness profile compared to bevacizumab was used for threshold analyses. First, we determined how much we overspend per injection. Second, we calculated the required effectiveness to justify the current price and the reasonable price for a drug leading to optimal vision. Finally, we estimated how much Europe overspends if bevacizumab is not first choice. RESULTS: Bevacizumab treatment costs €27,087 per year, about €4,000 less than aflibercept and €6,000 less than ranibizumab. With similar effectiveness for all drugs as shown by meta-analysis, bevacizumab was the most cost-effective. Aflibercept was chosen for threshold analyses. Aflibercept costs €943 per injection, but we determined that the maximum price to be cost-effective is €533. Alternatively, at its current price, aflibercept should yield about twice the visual gain. Even when optimal vision can be achieved, the maximum price for any treatment is €37,453 per year. Most importantly, Europe overspends €335 million yearly on AMD treatment when choosing aflibercept over bevacizumab. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab is the most cost-effective treatment for AMD, yet is not the standard of care across Europe. The registered drugs ranibizumab and aflibercept lead to large overspending without additional health benefits. Health authorities should consider taking steps to implement bevacizumab into clinical practice as first choice.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/economía , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Bevacizumab/economía , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Esquema de Medicación , Aprobación de Drogas , Costos de los Medicamentos , Europa (Continente) , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Degeneración Macular/economía , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado/economía , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Ranibizumab/administración & dosificación , Ranibizumab/economía , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Agudeza Visual
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA