Phytochemical Estimation and Therapeutic Amelioration of Aesculus hippocastanum L. Seeds Ethanolic Extract in Gastric Ulcer in Rats Possibly by Inhibiting Prostaglandin Synthesis.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify phytochemicals using liquid chromatography and mass spectroscopy (LCMS) analysis and explore the therapeutic effect of Aesculus hippocastanum L. (AH) seeds ethanolic extract against gastric ulcers in rats. METHODS: Preliminary phytochemical testing and LCMS analysis were performed according to standard methods. For treatment, the animals were divided into 7 groups including normal control, ulcer control, self-healing, AH seeds low and high doses, ranitidine and per se groups. Rats were orally administered with 10 mg/kg of indomethacin, excluding the normal control group (which received 1% carboxy methyl cellulose) and the per se group (received 200 mg/kg AH seeds extract). The test group rats were then given 2 doses of AH seeds extract (100 and 200 mg/kg, respectively), while the standard group was given ranitidine (50 mg/kg). On the 11th day, rats in all groups were sacrificed, and their stomach was isolated to calculate the ulcer index, and other parameters such as blood prostaglandin (PGE2), tissue superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), malonyldialdehyde (MDA), and glutathione (GSH). All isolated stomach tissues were analyzed for histopathological findings. RESULTS: The phytochemical examination shows that the AH seeds contain alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, phenolic components, and glycosides. LCMS analysis confirms the presence of quercetin and rutin. The AH seeds extract showed significant improvement in gastric mucosa conditions after indomethacin-induced gastric lesions (P<0.01). Further marked improvement in blood PGE2 and antioxidant enzymes, SOD, CAT, MDA and GSH, were observed compared with self-healing and untreated ulcer-induced groups (P<0.01). Histopathology results confirmed that AH seeds extract improved the mucosal layer and gastric epithelial membrane in treated groups compared to untreated ulcer-induced groups. CONCLUSIONS: LCMS report confirms the presence of quercetin and rutin in AH seeds ethanolic extract. The therapeutic effect of AH seeds extract against indomethacin-induced ulcer in rat model indicated the regenerated membrane integrity, with improved cellular functions and mucus thickness. Further, improved antioxidant enzyme level would help to reduce PGE2 biosynthesis.

Mucosal protective agents prevent exacerbation of NSAID-induced small intestinal lesions caused by antisecretory drugs in rats.

Antisecretory drugs such as histamine H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors are commonly used for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal mucosal lesions induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, it has recently been reported that these drugs exacerbate NSAID-induced small intestinal lesions in rats. Unfortunately, there are few effective agents for the treatment of this complication. We examined the effects of mucosal protective agents (MPAs) (misoprostol, irsogladine, and rebamipide) and mucin of porcine stomach on diclofenac-induced intestinal lesions and the exacerbation of the lesions by ranitidine or omeprazole. The effects of the drugs on intestinal motility and mucus distribution/content were also examined. Male Wistar rats (180-220 g) were used. Each drug was administered orally under fed conditions. Diclofenac (1-10 mg/kg) produced multiple lesions in the small intestine dose-dependently. Both ranitidine (30 mg/kg) and omeprazole (100 mg/kg) significantly increased the intestinal lesions induced by low doses (3 and 6 mg/kg) of diclofenac. Misoprostol (0.03-0.3 mg/kg), irsogladine (3-30 mg/kg), and rebamipide (30-300 mg/kg), as well as mucin (30-300 mg/kg) inhibited the formation of intestinal lesions caused by a high dose (10 mg/kg) of diclofenac alone and prevented the exacerbation of diclofenac-induced lesions by antisecretory drugs. Diclofenac (10 mg/kg) markedly increased the intestinal motility and decreased the mucosal mucus, and the decrease of mucus was significantly inhibited by the MPAs. These results indicate the usefulness of the MPAs for the treatment of intestinal lesions induced by NSAIDs alone or by coadministration with antisecretory drugs, and suggest that mucus plays an important role in the protection of intestinal mucosa by the MPAs.

Bacterial infections in cirrhosis: role of proton pump inhibitors and intestinal permeability.

BACKGROUND: Cirrhotic patients are at considerable risk for bacterial infections, possibly through increased intestinal permeability and bacterial overgrowth. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may increase infection risk. We aimed to explore the potential association between PPI use and bacterial infection risk in cirrhotic patients and potential underlying mechanisms in complementary patient and animal models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bacterial overgrowth was determined in jejunum of 30 rats randomly allocated to 6-week PPI treatment, gastrectomy or no treatment. In 84 consecutive cirrhotic patients, bacterial infection risk was prospectively assessed and related to PPI use. Intestinal permeability was determined by polyethylene glycol (PEG) test in nine healthy individuals and 12 cirrhotic patients. RESULTS: Bacterial overgrowth was much more common in jejunum of rats treated with PPI or gastrectomy compared with nontreated rats. Twenty-four patients (29%) developed a bacterial infection during a median follow-up of 28 months. Although PPI users tended to experience infection more often than patients without PPI therapy, PPI use was not an independent predictor of bacterial infection (HR 1·2, 95% CI 0·5-3·0, P = 0·72), after correction for Child-Pugh class (HR 3·6, 95% CI 1·5-8·7, P = 0·004) and age (HR 1·05, 95%CI 1·01-1·09, P = 0·02). In cirrhotic patients, 24-h urinary recovery of PEGs 1500 and 3350 was significantly higher compared with healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: Although in our animal model PPIs induced intestinal overgrowth, stage of liver disease rather than PPI use was the predominant factor determining infection risk in cirrhotic patients. Increased intestinal permeability may be a factor contributing to infection risk.

Moxifloxacine plus amoxicillin and ranitidine bismuth citrate or esomeprazole triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection.

Up to 20% of patients, or even more, will fail to obtain eradication after a standard triple therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of moxifloxacine-containing regimens in the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori. One hundred and twenty H. pylori-positive patients were randomized into four groups to receive one of the following 14-day treatments: ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) 400 mg b.d. plus amoxicillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (RAC group, n = 30); RBC 400 mg b.d. plus moxifloxacine 400 mg o.d. and amoxicillin 1,000 mg b.d. (RAM group, n = 30); esomeprazole 40 mg b.d. plus amoxicillin 1,000 mg b.d. plus clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (EAC group, n = 30); and esomeprazole 40 mg b.d. plus amoxicillin 1,000 mg b.d. plus moxifloxacine 400 mg o.d. (EAM group, n = 30). Eradication was assessed by (13)C urea breath test 8 weeks after therapy. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication was achieved in 23 out of 30 patients (76.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 61-92) in the RAC group, in 20 patients (66.7%, 95% CI: 49-84) in the RAM group, in 16 patients in the EAM group (53.3%, 95% CI: 34-71), and in 19 patients in the EAC group (63.3%, 95% CI: 54-72). Mild or moderate side-effects were significantly more common in the EAM group (70%) compared to the RAC (36.6%), RAM (43.3%), and EAC (56.6%) groups (P = 0.03). From our results, we conclude that moxifloxacine-containing triple therapies have neither eradication nor compliance advantages over standard triple therapies. Further studies with new antibiotic associations are needed for the better eradication of H. pylori in developing regions of the world.

The impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs. omeprazole-based one-week triple therapies in H. pylori eradication--a randomised controlled trial.

AIMS: To compare ranitidine bismuth citrate with omeprazole as to their efficacy to eradicate H. pylori in two different treatment schedules both consisting of a combination of either of above with two antibiotics for 1 week, and to relate these treatment results to primary antibiotic resistance. METHODS: 256 H. pylori positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomised to one of the following four treatment groups: omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (OCA); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (RBCCA); omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (OCM); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (RBCCM). All drugs were given twice daily for one week. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori by CLO test, histology and culture on gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomisation and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxycillin was determined by E-test. RESULTS: On per-protocol analysis, overall eradication rates were 96% for RBCCA vs. 85% for OCA (p = 0.03), and 95% for RBCCM vs. 79% for OCM (p = 0.01). Amongst the 196 patients (77% of the entire study group) in whom antibiotic sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance was found in 8% for clarithromycin, in 33% for metronidazole, and in 0% for amoxycillin. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 89%/40% for OCA (p = 0.0042) and 98%/80% for RBCCA (p = 0.0428). When strains were sensitive to both antibiotics, cure rates with OCM/RBCCM were 87%/96% respectively (p = 0.39), for strains resistant to clarithromycin only, eradication was achieved in 82% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.2), and in the case of metronidazole resistance in 85% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxycillin produced higher eradication rates than omeprazole co-administered with the same antibiotics. This appeared especially prominent in the subgroups with clarithromycin resistance without, however, reaching statistical significance. Efficacy of neither eradication regimen was influenced by metronidazole sensitivity to a significant degree.

Changes in serum interferon-gamma, interleukin-4, and interleukin-12 cytokine levels in anti-histamine type 2-treated allergic rhinitis patients.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Markedly elevated immunoglobulin E (IgE) synthesis characterizes allergic diseases. Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) regulate IgE synthesis. It has been shown that immunotherapy and histamine type 2 (H2) receptor antagonists induce a clinical improvement, decrease IgE antibodies, and increase T-cell subsets, which express a suppressor function. In addition, immunotherapy brings about a reduction in the amount of IL-4 in T-cell clones of allergic individuals. The purpose of this study was to investigate the profile of cytokines IFNgamma and IL-4 that occurs in vivo in anti-H2-treated patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). METHODS: Enrolled were 65 AR patients with sensitivity to a single allergen, the Parietaria, 36 of whom were randomly assigned to treatment with ranitidine at a dosage of 1 mg/kg per day intravenously for 20 days, and 29 to placebo treatment. RESULTS: A comparison of the serum cytokine values recorded before and after anti-H2 treatment showed a significant increase in INF-gamma serum level (P = .003) and a decrease in IL-4 (P = .016). Negligible variations were found in the placebo-treated group. CONCLUSION: H2 antagonists probably induce their effects by enhancing the amount of IFN-gamma and by reducing IL-4 cytokines, which, respectively, induce a decrease and an increase in the IgE synthesis.

Five-day regimens containing ranitidine bismuth citrate plus high-dose clarithromycin and either amoxycillin or tinidazole for Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: Ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)-based triple therapies for a period of 7 days have proved to be an effective treatment for Helicobacter pylori. AIM: To investigate the eradication efficacy, safety profile and patient compliance of two RBC-based triple therapies given for 5 days. METHODS: Eighty H. pylori-positive patients with dyspeptic symptoms, referred to us for gastroscopy, were consecutively enrolled in this prospective, randomized, open-label study. These patients were randomly assigned to receive a 5-day course of RBC 400 mg b.d. plus clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and either tinidazole 500 mg b.d. (RBCCT group) or amoxycillin 1 g b.d. (RBCCA group). The H. pylori status was assessed by means of histology and rapid urease test at entry, and by 13C-urea breath test 8 weeks after the completion of treatment. RESULTS: All enrolled patients completed the study. Thirty-seven of 40 patients treated with RBCCT (both PP and ITT analysis: 93%; 95% CI: 80-98%) and 35 of 40 in the RBCCA group (both PP and ITT analysis: 88%; 95% CI: 73-96%) returned H. pylori-negative. Slight or mild side-effects occurred in 4/40 patients (10%) in the RBCCT group and in 5/40 (12%) in the RBCCA group. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study demonstrating the efficacy of RBC-based triple therapies given for only 5 days. RBC regimens containing high-dose clarithromycin and either amoxycillin or tinidazole prove to be well tolerated, safe and preserve good eradication rates even when administered for a shorter than conventional duration.

Standard-dose lansoprazole is more effective than high-dose ranitidine in achieving endoscopic healing and symptom relief in patients with moderately severe reflux oesophagitis. The Dutch Lansoprazole Study Group.

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of reflux oesophagitis, H2-receptor antagonists are still widely used in spite of the apparent higher efficacy of proton pump inhibitors. In an attempt to compensate for the lower efficacy, H2-receptor antagonists are now increasingly being used at a higher dose. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether or not standard-dose lansoprazole (30 mg o.d.) is more effective than high-dose ranitidine (300 mg b.d.) in moderately severe reflux oesophagitis (grades II-III). METHODS: Lansoprazole or ranitidine was given to 133 patients for 4-8 weeks in a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, multicentre trial. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with endoscopically-verified healing was significantly higher on lansoprazole than on ranitidine both after 4 weeks (79% vs. 42%) and 8 weeks (91% vs. 66%), though smoking had a negative impact on oesophagitis healing with lansoprazole. Heartburn, retrosternal pain and belching improved significantly better with lansoprazole than with ranitidine, as did the patient-rated overall symptom severity. Relief of heartburn appeared somewhat faster with ranitidine, but was more pronounced with lansoprazole. The number of patients with adverse events was similar in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Standard-dose lansoprazole is better than high-dose ranitidine in moderately severe reflux oesophagitis.

Twice-daily versus thrice-daily clarithromycin in combination with ranitidine bismuth citrate in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: Ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC), 400 mg bid for 4 weeks, plus clarithromycin, 500 mg tid, is a regimen approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcers. Proof that the clarithromycin portion of the regimen could be given twice daily without loss of efficacy would reduce cost and improve patient compliance. The objective of this study was to compare the H. pylori eradication rates in patients who had duodenal ulcer and were randomly assigned to 4 weeks of treatment with RBC, 400 mg bid, in conjunction with 2 weeks of therapy with either clarithromycin, 500 mg tid, or clarithromycin, 500 mg bid. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had a duodenal ulcer and were H. pylori-positive by at least two tests were randomly assigned to (1) RBC, 400 mg bid for 4 weeks, plus clarithromycin, 500 mg tid for 2 weeks, or (2) RBC, 400 mg bid for 4 weeks, plus clarithromycin, 500 mg bid for 2 weeks. H. pylori eradication was assessed 4 weeks after completion of RBC plus clarithromycin. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-three patients from 78 centers had a duodenal ulcer and were H. pylori-positive. The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) and the per-protocol (PP) eradication rates were statistically equivalent between the twice-daily (65% MITT, 74% PP) and thrice-daily (63% MITT, 73% PP) clarithromycin treatment regimens. Incidence and types of adverse events did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: For eradicating H. pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer, clarithromycin, 500 mg bid for 2 weeks, with RBC, 400 mg bid for 4 weeks, is equivalent to clarithromycin, 500 mg tid with RBC. The potential enhancement of patient compliance, reduced cost of clarithromycin, and equivalent efficacy would support the use of twice-daily clarithromycin in triple-therapy regimens with RBC.

Spiramycin is comparable to oxytetracycline in eradicating H. pylori when given with ranitidine bismuth citrate and metronidazole.

BACKGROUND: We have consistently achieved about 90% eradication of H. pylori with liquid bismuth, metronidazole and oxytetracycline. AIM: To test eradication and adverse events of ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) when given with metronidazole and either oxytetracycline or spiramycin. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-three patients were randomized to one of four 10-day regimens: RBC400OM: RBC 400 mg b.d., oxytetracycline 500 mg q.d.s.; RBC400SM: RBC 400 mg b.d., spiramycin 1 g q.d.s.; RBC200OM: RBC 200 mg q.d.s., oxytetracycline 500 mg q.d.s.; RBC200SM: RBC 200 mg q.d.s., spiramycin 1 g q.d.s. Additionally, all patients received metronidazole 400 mg q.d.s. A 14C-urea breath test was performed at 8 weeks. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat eradication rates were 94%, 91%, 94% and 89% with RBC400OM, RBC400SM, RBC200OM and RBC200SM, respectively (P = 0.81). Eradication was significantly higher in ulcer patients (97%) than in those with diagnoses other than ulcer (86%) (P = 0.009). There was a strong tendency to better eradication among those who had never smoked (100%) compared with ex-smokers (93%) and smokers (89%) (P = 0.06). Fifty-three per cent experienced at least one moderate or severe adverse event, and women had more adverse events than men (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: All four regimens had comparable efficacy and adverse events. Eradication was significantly better in ulcer patients but there was a trend to better eradication in those who smoked less, used less alcohol and exercised more. Adverse events were frequent, perhaps because of the large dose of metronidazole used, but few patients stopped treatment.

Low- versus high-dose azithromycin triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: We report a clinical trial which evaluated the effectiveness of triple therapy containing low- and high-dose azithromycin to treat Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: From March 1997 to March 1998, patients infected with H. pylori were assigned to receive either: Treatment 1: ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) (400 mg b.d.) and amoxycillin (1 g b.d.) for 10 days with azithromycin 500 mg o.m. for 3 days: or Treatment 2: RBC and amoxycillin for 10 days with azithromycin 1 g o.m. for 3 days. H. pylori eradication was established by a urea breath test at least 4 weeks after therapy. Side-effects and compliance were assessed using a diary. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled. Fifty-seven per cent of patients were treated for active peptic ulcer disease or a history of peptic ulcer disease. Treatment 1 cured H. pylori in 44% and 44% by per protocol and intention-to-treat analysis, respectively. The corresponding eradication rates for Treatment 2 were 79% and 75%. Two patients taking Treatment 2 dropped out of the study because of side-effects. CONCLUSIONS: With RBC and amoxycillin for 10 days, azithromycin at a dose of 1 g/day for 3 days was significantly better at curing H. pylori infection than azithromycin 500 mg/day for 3 days.

Lansoprazole versus ranitidine in the maintenance treatment of reflux oesophagitis.

AIMS: To assess the relative efficacies of lansoprazole 15 mg once daily, lansoprazole 30 mg once daily and ranitidine 300 mg b.d. in the maintenance treatment of reflux oesophagitis for 12 months. METHODS: Multicentre, out-patient, double-blind, parallel group, prospectively randomized clinical trial. Patients with grade 0, asymptomatic oesophagitis after 8 weeks of treatment with lansoprazole 30 mg once daily were randomized to receive lansoprazole 30 mg once daily (L30) (n = 75), lansoprazole 15 mg once daily (L15) (n = 86) or ranitidine 300 mg b.d. (R600) (n = 74) for 12 months. Endoscopy was repeated at 6 and 12 months, and symptomatic assessment was made every 3 months. Efficacy was primarily assessed by the time to endoscopically confirmed relapse (oesophagitis grade > or = 1) and the proportion of patients who relapsed during the 12-month study period. Severity of symptoms were secondary efficacy measures. RESULTS: For all patients randomized with at least one post-baseline endoscopy (intent-to-treat principle) both lansoprazole 15 mg (P < 0.001) and lansoprazole 30 mg (P < 0.001) were significantly superior to ranitidine 600 mg with respect to time to endoscopic relapse. There was no difference between the lansoprazole groups (P = 0.11). There was evidence of relapse in 27 of 86 (31.4%), 15 of 75 (20.0%) and 50 of 74 (67.6%) of the patients treated with lansoprazole 15 mg and 30 mg and ranitidine 600 mg, respectively. Patients receiving treatment with either lansoprazole dosages experienced significantly less severe heartburn and regurgitation than those patients treated with ranitidine. There were no differences between the treatment groups with respect to the severity or incidence of adverse events. No clinically significant laboratory changes were observed in any of the treatment groups. Serum gastrin levels were elevated in all treatment groups, and most markedly in those patients receiving lansoprazole, but there was no significant difference between the treatments. Morphological and immunohistochemical examination of the gastric biopsies revealed no clinically relevant changes from baseline in any of the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Both lansoprazole 15 mg and lansoprazole 30 mg once daily are significantly more effective than high-dose ranitidine in maintaining reflux oesophagitis in remission.

Drug-induced hypergastrinemia: absence of trophic effects on colonic carcinoma in rats.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Published studies suggest that hypergastrinemia stimulates growth of normal or malignant colon tissue. Other studies dispute these findings. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that hypergastrinemia enhances progression or invasiveness of colon cancer. METHODS: Colonic carcinomas were induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats by six weekly intraperitoneal injections of methylazoxymethanol. Four weeks after the last injection of carcinogen, the animals were randomized into four treatment groups, including vehicle control, low- and high-dose omeprazole, and ranitidine. After 10 weeks of treatment, the animals were bled, stomach weights were recorded, and colon tumors were mapped, enumerated, measured, and scored histopathologically by Dukes' classification. Crypt and mucosal heights were determined in colonic mucosa unaffected by tumor. RESULTS: Drug administration induced a sustained hypergastrinemia that did not enhance tumor burden or invasiveness or crypt height/mucosal height ratios. Ranitidine-treated rats consumed less food, weighed less, and developed fewer tumors. This group also had lower crypt and mucosal heights than rats in the vehicle- or omeprazole-treated rats. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that endogenous hypergastrinemia induced by these acid-suppressing drugs has no stimulatory effect on colon mucosal growth or progression or biological behavior of experimental rat colon cancer.

Immunological reactivity in ranitidine factory workers.

The involvement of immunological reactivity to ranitidine base (R-b) and ranitidine hydrochloride (R-HCl) in the development of occupationally related symptomatology was analyzed in 40 subjects employed in a pharmaceutical plant producing ranitidine and in 33 nonexposed controls, using a specific dose-response lymphocyte proliferative test (lymphocyte transformation test: LTT). Of the 40 workers, 11 (28%) gave positive reactions to LTT: 3/11 to R-b, 4/11 to R-HCl, and 4/11 to both compounds. None of the controls gave positive reactions. Cutaneous, oculonasal, or respiratory work-related symptoms were cited by 23 of the 40 (58%) subjects; ten of these 23 subjects (43%) were LTT positive. One asymptomatic case was LTT positive. The present results indicate that specific immune reactivity to ranitidine, analyzed by LTT, is associated with the presence of occupational symptomatology; R-HCl and R-b seem to share some antigenic determinants, because of the partial cross-reactivity shown by the examined compounds. Nonimmunological, probably irritative, mechanisms are also present in some of the symptomatic subjects.

Efficacy, duration, and absorption of a paediatric oral liquid preparation of ranitidine hydrochloride.

The objectives of this study were to assess the clinical efficacy of a new oral ranitidine liquid preparation in reducing gastric acidity and volume, to determine the degree of absorption of the drug, and to determine the duration of drug effect. Eighty preoperative children between the ages of one and six years were enrolled in each of three centres. Each subject was allocated to one of the following groups: Group A - apple juice, 5 ml.kg-1 plus placebo liquid; Group B - apple juice, 5 ml.kg-1 plus ranitidine hydrochloride 2 mg.kg-1; Group C - water, 5 ml and placebo liquid; or Group D - water, 5 ml and ranitidine liquid 2 mg.kg-1. All study agents were administered at least two hours before surgery along with a dye marker, sulfobromophthalein 1 ml (50 mg.ml-1). Following induction of anaesthesia, gastric fluid was aspirated, and analyzed for pH, volume, and sulfobromophthalein content (as an index of the ingested fluids). A serum sample was also drawn and analyzed for ranitidine content by high performance liquid chromatography. Groups B and D had fewer subjects with pH below 2.5 and gastric volume > 0.4 ml.kg-1. The duration of reduced volume and acidity was shown to be greatest from two to four hours after drug administration. Thirty-three percent of subjects receiving oral ranitidine, 2 mg.kg-1 hydrochloride as a single dose demonstrated no measurable effect on gastric pH and volume; 28 of those subjects had adequate ranitidine serum levels.

The efficacy and tolerability of famotidine and ranitidine on the healing of active duodenal ulcer and during six-month maintenance treatment, with special reference to NSAID/aspirin-related ulcers.

The subjects of this multicenter study were 160 patients with endoscopically confirmed active duodenal ulcers, randomly assigned to receive 40 mg of famotidine or 300 mg of ranitidine nightly for four to eight weeks. During a subsequent six-month maintenance treatment phase, the patients received 20 mg of famotidine or 150 mg of ranitidine nightly. After eight weeks of treatment, ulcer healing was endoscopically confirmed in 94% of the 81 famotidine-treated patients and in 80% of the 79 ranitidine-treated patients (P less than 0.01). During the first week of treatment, daytime and nighttime pain scores were significantly lower in the famotidine-treated than ranitidine-treated patients. During the maintenance treatment phase, the ulcer in 79% of 58 famotidine-treated patients and in 81% of 52 ranitidine-treated patients remained healed. Multivariate analysis of factors such as age, sex, smoking, alcohol and coffee consumption, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), history of ulcer, and ulcer size and number showed that they had no significant effects on the differences in healing rates between the two treatment groups. The ulcers were all healed in the famotidine-treated patients whose ulcers were associated with the prior use of NSAIDs. The results of this and many other studies indicate that, unless ulcer healing is confirmed by endoscopy, treatment of active duodenal ulcers should continue for six to eight weeks.

Omeprazole or high-dose ranitidine in the treatment of patients with reflux oesophagitis not responding to 'standard doses' of H2-receptor antagonists.

Ninety-eight patients (26 females), who presented with erosive and/or ulcerative oesophagitis, despite at least a 3-month period of treatment with standard doses of cimetidine (greater than or equal to 1200 mg daily) or ranitidine (greater than or equal to 300 mg daily), were included in a double-blind, randomized trial to compare omeprazole (40 mg o.m.) with a high dose of ranitidine (300 mg b.d.). The treatment was given for 4-12 weeks; endoscopy assessment and laboratory screening were performed on entry to the trial and thereafter every fourth week. Endoscopic healing was defined as complete epithelialization of all macroscopic erosions or ulcers in the squamous epithelium. An 'intention-to-treat' analysis of the clinical data revealed omeprazole to be superior to ranitidine: 63% of those patients who were given omeprazole were healed endoscopically after a 4-week period of treatment, compared with only 17% of those given ranitidine. This difference in healing rate persisted during the 12-week study period (90% vs 47% after 12 weeks; P less than 0.0001). Reflux symptoms were more rapidly and completely relieved with omeprazole: heartburn resolved completely in 86% of patients treated with omeprazole for 4 weeks compared with 32% in the ranitidine group (P less than 0.0001). The mean basal gastrin concentrations increased only in those given omeprazole from 18.9 pmol/L at pre-entry to a mean value of 31.7 pmol/L on the last day of omeprazole administration. In ranitidine-treated patients no significant increase in basal gastrin concentration was observed. Both drugs were well tolerated with few adverse events, which were mainly mild and transient. These results demonstrate the superiority of omeprazole over a high dose of ranitidine in the treatment of resistant reflux oesophagitis.

Dietary supplementation with pectin in the maintenance treatment of duodenal ulcer. A controlled study.

Patients with recently healed duodenal ulcers diagnosed by endoscopy were randomly allocated to receive 10 g apple pectin USP powder twice daily, 150 mg ranitidine at night, or one tablet matching ranitidine placebo at night for 6 months. Repeat endoscopy was performed at 6 months or if symptoms recurred. Eighty-three patients completed the study. Recurrences occurred in 23 of 27 (85%) patients taking pectin, 6 of 28 (21%) patients taking ranitidine, and 20 of 28 (71%) patients taking placebo. (Pectin versus placebo, NS; ranitidine versus pectin, p less than 0.00001; ranitidine versus placebo, p less than 0.0005). The average amount of pectin taken was 12.7 g/day in patients who relapsed and 12.4 g/day in those who did not. At the doses taken, therefore, dietary supplementation with pectin did not reduce the incidence of duodenal ulcer relapse.