Clinical Utility of Autologous Salvaged Blood: a Review.

INTRODUCTION: Autologous salvaged blood, commonly referred to as "cell saver" or "cell salvage" blood, is an important method of blood conservation. Understanding the mechanism of action and summarizing the existing evidence regarding the safety, efficiency, and the relative costs of cell salvage may help educate clinicians on how and when to best utilize autotransfusion. METHODS: This review focuses on issues concerning the quality of red blood cells (RBC), efficiency, and the cost effectiveness relative to autotransfusion. The key considerations of safe use and clinical applicability are described along with the challenges for wider dissemination. RESULTS: Cell salvage can reduce requirements for allogeneic transfusions, along with the associated risks and costs. Autologous salvaged RBCs provide high-quality transfusion, since the cells have not been subjected to the adverse effects of storage as occurs with banked blood. The risks for RBC alloimmunization and transfusion-related infectious diseases are also avoided. With a careful selection of cases, salvaged blood can be more cost effective than donor blood. Cell salvage may have a role in cardiac, major vascular, orthopedic, transplant, and trauma surgeries. However, there remain theoretical safety concerns in cases with bacterial contamination or in cancer surgery. CONCLUSION: In addition to other methods of blood conservation used in patient blood management programs, autologous salvaged blood adds value and is cost effective for appropriate surgical cases. Evidence suggests that autologous salvaged blood may be of higher quality and confer a cost reduction compared with the allogeneic banked blood, when used appropriately.

A Retrospective Comparative Study of Different Methods of Blood Management in Total Knee Replacement.

Perioperative blood management is essential to minimize allogeneic blood transfusion in total knee replacement. The effect of preoperative administration of erythropoietin, intraoperative cell saver, tranexamic acid, and restrictive transfusion strategies on allogeneic transfusion is studied in total knee replacement. A retrospective comparative study of 106 patients who underwent total knee replacement in different time periods was performed. Group A (n 1 = 45) underwent restrictive strategies of transfusion between 2009 and 2010. Group B (n 2 = 24) includes patients where erythropoietin of either 10.000 IU or 20.000 IU was given preoperatively. Patients of Group C (n 3 = 21) underwent autologous washed erythrocytes transfusion through a cell saver. Lastly, in Group D (n 4 = 15) tranexamic acid dose of 1 gr IV was given intraoperatively. The preoperative and discharge hemoglobin together with total units of blood transfusion and creatinine levels was studied. Tranexamic acid noted the least units of blood transfusion (mean = 0.82 units/patient, p < 0.001, CI 95%) in contrast to the two regimens of erythropoietin (1.16 units/patient) OrthoPAT (1.43 units/patient) and restrictive strategies (1.92 units/patient). The mean preoperative hemoglobin was 13.37 g/dL with no statistical difference among the groups of patients. The postoperative mean hemoglobin was 10.59 with no statistical difference among the groups of patients too. Additionally, the mean creatinine level was 0.93 mg/dL; however, no statistical difference among the groups of patients was noted. Finally, tranexamic acid seemed to be the most cost-effective regime. In our study, tranexamic acid proved its superiority concerning the postoperative blood transfusion on patients undergoing total knee replacement, in comparison with the other existing methods of perioperative blood management. This is a Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Trial of intraoperative cell salvage versus transfusion in ovarian cancer (TIC TOC): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study.

INTRODUCTION: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynaecological cancer, with more than 7000 new cases registered in the UK in 2014. In patients suitable for surgery, the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guidance for treatment recommends surgical resection of all macroscopic tumour, followed by chemotherapy. The surgical procedure can be extensive and associated with substantial blood loss which is conventionally replaced with a donor blood transfusion. While often necessary and lifesaving, the use of donor blood is associated with increased risks of complications and adverse surgical outcomes. Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) is a blood conservation strategy in which red cells collected from blood lost during surgery are returned to the patient thus minimising the use of donor blood. This is the protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial with an embedded qualitative study and feasibility economic evaluation. If feasible, a later definitive trial will test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ICS reinfusion versus donor blood transfusion in ovarian cancer surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Sixty adult women scheduled for primary or interval ovarian cancer surgery at participating UK National Health Service Trusts will be recruited and individually randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive ICS reinfusion or donor blood (as required) during surgery. Participants will be followed up by telephone at 30 days postoperatively for adverse events monitoring and by postal questionnaire at 6 weeks and 3 monthly thereafter, to capture quality of life and resource use data. Qualitative interviews will capture participants' and clinicians' experiences of the study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been granted ethical approval by the South West-Exeter Research Ethics Committee (ref: 16/SW/0256). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and will inform the design of a larger trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN19517317.

Cell Saver for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Reduces Cost.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVES: To determine if the use of cell saver reduces overall blood costs in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recent studies have questioned the clinical value of cell saver during spine procedures. METHODS: ASD patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter surgical database who had complete preoperative and surgical data were identified. Patients were stratified into (1) cell saver available during surgery, but no intraoperative autologous infusion (No Infusion group), or (2) cell saver available and received autologous infusion (Infusion group). RESULTS: There were 427 patients in the Infusion group and 153 in the No infusion group. Patients in both groups had similar demographics. Mean autologous infusion volume was 698 mL. The Infusion group had a higher percentage of EBL relative to the estimated blood volume (42.2%) than the No Infusion group (19.6%, p < .000). Allogeneic transfusion was more common in the Infusion group (255/427, 60%) than the No Infusion group (67/153, 44%, p = .001). The number of allogeneic blood units transfused was also higher in the Infusion group (2.4) than the No Infusion group (1.7, p = .009). Total blood costs ranged from $396 to $2,146 in the No Infusion group and from $1,262 to $5,088 in the Infusion group. If the cost of cell saver blood was transformed into costs of allogeneic blood, total blood costs for the Infusion group would range from $840 to $5,418. Thus, cell saver use yielded a mean cost savings ranging from $330 to $422 (allogeneic blood averted). Linear regression showed that after an EBL of 614 mL, cell saver becomes cost-efficient. CONCLUSION: Compared to transfusing allogeneic blood, cell saver autologous infusion did not reduce the proportion or the volume of allogeneic transfusion for patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity. The use of cell saver becomes cost-efficient above an EBL of 614 mL, producing a cost savings of $330 to $422. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of intra-operative cell salvage in high-bleeding-risk cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective randomized and controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Intra-operative cell salvage (CS) was reported to be ineffective, safe and not cost-effective in low-bleeding-risk cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), but studies in high-bleeding-risk cardiac surgery are limited. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of intra-operative CS in high-bleeding-risk cardiac surgery with CPB. METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients were randomly assigned to either with intra-operative CS group (Group CS) or without intra-operative CS group (Group C). Study endpoints were defined as perioperative allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, perioperative impairment of blood coagulative function, postoperative adverse events and costs of transfusion-related. RESULTS: Both the proportion and quantity of perioperative allogeneic RBC transfusion were significantly lower in Group CS than that in Group C (p=0.0002, <0.0001, respectively). The incidence of residual heparin and total impairment of blood coagulative function in the 24 hours after surgery, the incidence of postoperative excessive bleeding, were significantly higher in Group CS than that in Group C (p=0.018, 0.042, 0.034, respectively). Cost of both allogeneic RBC transfusion and total allogeneic blood transfusion were significantly lower in Group CS than that in Group C (p<0.001, =0.002, respectively). Cost of total blood transfusion was significantly higher in Group CS than that in Group C (p =0.001). CONCLUSION: Intra-operative CS in high-bleeding-risk cardiac surgery with CPB is effective, generally safe, and cost-effective in developed countries but not in China.

Red blood cell salvage during obstetric hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: To describe which obstetric patients lose enough blood during postpartum hemorrhage to receive a reinfusion of intraoperative blood salvage. METHODS: Eight years of intraoperative blood salvage data from a regional tertiary care maternity hospital were analyzed. The volume of blood returned through intraoperative blood salvage was standardized to the volume of red blood cells in an allogeneic red blood cell unit from the blood bank. RESULTS: There were 884 obstetric hemorrhage cases in which intraoperative blood salvage was utilized. Sufficient blood was collected by intraoperative blood salvage to permit reinfusion in 189 of 884 (21%) patients. For patients in whom intraoperative blood salvage blood was reinfused, the mean ± standard deviation number of reinfused shed blood units was 1.2 ± 1.1 units. Although intraoperative blood salvage was most commonly performed on patients who underwent routine cesarean delivery (748/884 patients), only 13% of these patients received an intraoperative blood salvage reinfusion; 73% of the patients undergoing cesarean hysterectomy, 69% of those who had bleeding after cesarean delivery, and 53% of the patients who bled after vaginal delivery received an intraoperative blood salvage reinfusion (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Although intraoperative blood salvage was attempted on many patients, on only 21% of the women was a sufficient amount of intraoperative shed blood collected to proceed with reinfusion. Patients who experienced bleeding or who underwent a cesarean hysterectomy were the most likely to receive a reinfusion of intraoperative blood salvage-processed blood.

Medical and Economic Advantages of Postoperative Blood Salvage in Total Knee Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Total knee replacement surgery causes large blood loss leading to worsening of the patient's physical capacity, difficulties in rehabilitation and necessity of transfusions. The re-infusion of drainage fluid has been described as an alternative way to improve hematological parameters. The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of re-transfusion with regard to the allogeneic transfusion rate, duration of treatment and costs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized study of 101 patients, divided into an RTF group for re-transfusion from the drain and a DRN group for standard drainage. We could not re-transfuse drainage blood in 6 cases. 38 patients (RTF2) received their blood back and the remaining 63 patients (DRN2) did not. Depending on blood loss, laboratory tests and general condition, decisions were made to proceed with allogeneic transfusions. RESULTS: In spite of the re-transfusion, 39.4% of the patients in RTF2 required an additional transfusion, compared to 53.9% of the patients in DRN2 (p=0.15). Mean deterioration in hematological parameters was 72.9% of baseline in RTF2 and 75.0% in DRN2 (p=0.45), mean treatment time was 10.3 days for RTF2 and 11.1 for DRN2 (p=0,24) and mean cost was PLN 5426.5 in RTF versus PLN 5587.21 in DRN (p=0.76). CONCLUSION: The effect of re-transfusion on reducing allogeneic blood usage is not significant, does not alter patients' general condition and lab test results and does not eliminate the need for transfusion or influence the duration of hospital stay and the costs.

Is a preoperative group and save necessary for enhanced recovery joint replacement patients?

AIM: To consider the financial benefit to the authors' trust of omitting a preoperative group and save in enhanced recovery arthroplasty patients, and to estimate the scope for national savings. Patient safety was considered to determine acceptability for routine practice. METHODS: A total of 121 patients receiving a total knee replacement or total hip replacement on the authors' enhanced recovery protocol were selected. Pre- and postoperative haemoglobin levels were obtained. The transfusion team were contacted when the postoperative haemoglobin level was ≤8 g/dl to determine whether blood products had been issued. Costs for group and save were obtained from the pathology department. RESULTS: Mean postoperative reduction in haemoglobin level was 2.6 g/dl (P≤0.001) and 2.1 g/dl (P≤0.001) for total hip replacement and total knee replacement respectively. No patients were transfused. One group and save costs £12.00, and omission of this test in these patients would have saved £1452.00. Potentially, £1 605 408 could have been saved in the 133 784 patients undergoing NHS arthroplasty in 2012. Group and save omission would not affect management of intraoperative haemorrhage where O negative blood would be available. If a transfusion is required postoperatively it would take 100 minutes to issue crossmatched blood - a time delay unlikely to compromise patient safety. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that a preoperative group and save could be omitted in arthroplasty patients on this enhanced recovery programme to prevent needless expenditure, but more long-term follow up is required to ensure patients are not put at risk.

Does current evidence support the use of intraoperative cell salvage in reducing the need for blood transfusion in caesarean section?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: An important cause of maternal morbidity and direct maternal death is obstetric haemorrhage at caesarean section. Concerns regarding allogeneic blood safety, limited blood supplies and rising health costs have collectively generated enthusiasm for the utility of methods intended to reduce the use of allogeneic blood transfusion in cases of haemorrhage at caesarean section. This can be achieved by intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS). The aim of this review is to summarize and examine the evidence for the efficacy of IOCS during caesarean section, in women at risk of haemorrhage, in reducing the need for allogeneic blood transfusion. RECENT FINDINGS: The majority of the evidence currently available is from case reports and case series. Although this evidence appears to support the use of IOCS in obstetrics, strong clinical evidence or economic effectiveness from clinical trials are essential to support the routine practice of IOCS in obstetrics. SUMMARY: Current evidence is limited to reported case series and two small controlled studies. Overall, IOCS may reduce the need for allogeneic blood transfusions during caesarean section. Future large randomized trials are required to assess effectiveness, cost effectiveness and safety. The results of the current ongoing SALVO (A randomised controlled trial of intra-operative cell salvage during caesarean section in women at risk of haemorrhage) trial will shed light on these aspects.

Cost savings of red cell salvage during cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To use decision analysis to evaluate whether and under what conditions routine setup of intraoperative cell salvage during cesarean delivery is cost-saving. METHODS: We developed a decision model to compare costs associated with two strategies for cesarean delivery: 1) routine setup of intraoperative cell salvage; or 2) standard care without intraoperative cell salvage. One-, two-, and three-way sensitivity analyses as well as Monte Carlo simulation were used to assess the robustness of our findings. RESULTS: Among nonselected women undergoing cesarean delivery, our base case estimate was that 3.2% would require red blood cell transfusion. Under this assumption, cell salvage is cost-saving only if each woman requires at least 60 units. Conversely, if only two units on average are required, the probability of transfusion needs to be at least 58% for cell salvage to be cost-saving. In our base case analysis, setup of intraoperative cell salvage during routine cesarean deliveries is not cost-saving, increasing the cost per cesarean delivery by $223.80. We found that cell salvage would be cost-saving only in very high-risk scenarios. For example, severe maternal anemia or abnormal placentation, in which 54% and 75% of women are transfused three and two units per case, respectively, would make cell salvage cost-saving. CONCLUSION: Setup of intraoperative cell salvage during cesarean delivery is cost-saving and should be considered only when there is a predictably high probability of transfusion or when a massive transfusion is reasonably likely.

Utility of cell salvage in women undergoing abdominal myomectomy.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the use and cost of autologous blood cell salvage in women who undergo abdominal myomectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who underwent abdominal myomectomy from 2007-2011 were identified. Use of the cell salvage system and reinfusion of autologous blood in women who had the system set-up were analyzed. Cost was examined by directly reported data. RESULTS: We identified 607 patients who underwent abdominal myomectomy. Four hundred twenty-five women (70%) had the set-up of the cell salvage system. Cell-salvaged blood was processed and reinfused into 85 of these subjects (20%). In a multivariable model, performance of myomectomy by a gynecologic-specific surgeon (odds ratio [OR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-3.59), >5 myomas (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.27-4.89), and larger uterine size statistically were associated significantly with cell-salvage device set-up. Conversely, having a reproductive-endocrinology-infertility specialist as the surgeon was associated with a significant reduction in cell-salvage system set-up (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21-0.66). For the women who had cell-salvage system set-up, uterine size of >15-19 weeks of gestation (OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.56-8.95) or ≥20 weeks of gestation (OR, 4.62; 95% CI, 1.45-14.73), operating time of >120 minutes (OR, 3.98; 95% CI, 1.70-9.29), and intraoperative blood loss of >1000 mL (OR, 26.31; 95% CI, 10.49-65.99) were associated significantly with a higher incidence of reinfusion of cell-salvaged blood. CONCLUSION: The routine use of cell salvage in women who undergo abdominal myomectomy does not appear to be warranted. Cell-salvage set-up appears to be cost-effective only when reinfused, but clinical characteristics cannot predict accurately which women will require reinfusion of cell-salvaged blood.

Patient blood management in elective total hip- and knee-replacement surgery (Part 1): a randomized controlled trial on erythropoietin and blood salvage as transfusion alternatives using a restrictive transfusion policy in erythropoietin-eligible patients.

BACKGROUND: Patient blood management combines the use of several transfusion alternatives. Integrated use of erythropoietin, cell saver, and/or postoperative drain reinfusion devices on allogeneic erythrocyte use was evaluated using a restrictive transfusion threshold. METHODS: In a factorial design, adult elective hip- and knee-surgery patients with hemoglobin levels 10 to 13 g/dl (n = 683) were randomized for erythropoietin or not, and subsequently for autologous reinfusion by cell saver or postoperative drain reinfusion devices or for no blood salvage device. Primary outcomes were mean allogeneic intra- and postoperative erythrocyte use and proportion of transfused patients (transfusion rate). Secondary outcome was cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: With erythropoietin (n = 339), mean erythrocyte use was 0.50 units (U)/patient and transfusion rate 16% while without (n = 344), these were 0.71 U/patient and 26%, respectively. Consequently, erythropoietin resulted in a nonsignificant 29% mean erythrocyte reduction (ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.13) and 50% reduction of transfused patients (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.75). Erythropoietin increased costs by €785 per patient (95% CI, 262 to 1,309), that is, €7,300 per avoided transfusion (95% CI, 1,900 to 24,000). With autologous reinfusion, mean erythrocyte use was 0.65 U/patient and transfusion rate was 19% with erythropoietin (n = 214) and 0.76 U/patient and 29% without (n = 206). Compared with controls, autologous blood reinfusion did not result in erythrocyte reduction and increased costs by €537 per patient (95% CI, 45 to 1,030). CONCLUSIONS: In hip- and knee-replacement patients (hemoglobin level, 10 to 13 g/dl), even with a restrictive transfusion trigger, erythropoietin significantly avoids transfusion, however, at unacceptably high costs. Autologous blood salvage devices were not effective.

Patient blood management in elective total hip- and knee-replacement surgery (part 2): a randomized controlled trial on blood salvage as transfusion alternative using a restrictive transfusion policy in patients with a preoperative hemoglobin above 13 g/dl.

BACKGROUND: Patient blood management is introduced as a new concept that involves the combined use of transfusion alternatives. In elective adult total hip- or knee-replacement surgery patients, the authors conducted a large randomized study on the integrated use of erythropoietin, cell saver, and/or postoperative drain reinfusion devices (DRAIN) to evaluate allogeneic erythrocyte use, while applying a restrictive transfusion threshold. Patients with a preoperative hemoglobin level greater than 13 g/dl were ineligible for erythropoietin and evaluated for the effect of autologous blood reinfusion. METHODS: Patients were randomized between autologous reinfusion by cell saver or DRAIN or no blood salvage device. Primary outcomes were mean intra- and postoperative erythrocyte use and proportion of transfused patients (transfusion rate). Secondary outcome was cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: In 1,759 evaluated total hip- and knee-replacement surgery patients, the mean erythrocyte use was 0.19 (SD, 0.9) erythrocyte units/patient in the autologous group (n = 1,061) and 0.22 (0.9) erythrocyte units/patient in the control group (n = 698) (P = 0.64). The transfusion rate was 7.7% in the autologous group compared with 8.3% in the control group (P = 0.19). No difference in erythrocyte use was found between cell saver and DRAIN groups. Costs were increased by €298 per patient (95% CI, 76 to 520). CONCLUSION: In patients with preoperative hemoglobin levels greater than 13 g/dl, autologous intra- and postoperative blood salvage devices were not effective as transfusion alternatives: use of these devices did not reduce erythrocyte use and increased costs.

Economic evaluation of cell salvage in pediatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Red blood cells are a scarce resource with demand outstripping supply. Use of intraoperative red cell salvage (CS) - the process of collecting shed blood during surgery and reinfusing it to patients - is often used as an effective blood conservation strategy. However, little is known about the economic impact of CS during pediatric surgery. METHODS: A decision tree model was used to estimate the transfusion-related costs per patient (2010 USD) from a healthcare system perspective of four transfusion strategies among children undergoing elective orthopedic or cardiac surgery: (i) CS followed by allogeneic transfusion, (ii) CS followed by autologous transfusion, (iii) allogeneic transfusion alone, and (iv) autologous transfusion alone. RESULTS: Cell salvage and allogeneic transfusion was the least expensive strategy (USD 883.3) followed by CS and autologous blood transfusion (USD 1,269.7), allogeneic transfusion alone (USD 1,443.0), and autologous transfusion alone (USD 1,824.7). Savings associated with CS use persisted in separate analyses of orthopedic and cardiac surgery, as well as in one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Use of CS, particularly along with allogeneic blood transfusion, appears cost-saving and cost-effective in pediatric surgery.

Clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of intraoperative cell salvage in pelvic trauma surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic acetabular injuries are associated with significant blood loss. This is compounded by multiple surgical interventions including definitive fracture fixation, which put patients at further risk of postoperative transfusion. We use intraoperative cell salvage routinely as a blood conservation strategy to address this issue. This is a prospective evaluation of the clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of using intraoperative cell salvage in patients with pelvic acetabular injuries. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively for all the patients who underwent pelvic acetabular fracture fixation at our institution. A total of 30 patients (25 men, 5 women) with a mean age of 41 years (range: 31-79 years) were assessed over a period of 10 months. RESULTS: The mean preoperative and postoperative haemoglobin levels were 11.8g/dl and 9.9g/dl respectively. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 1,232.5ml (range: 150-2,693ml). The mean amount of blood salvaged and retransfused through a cell saver was 388ml. Of the 30 patients, 14 (47%) required transfusion after surgery and 26 units of blood were transfused. In terms of cost effectiveness, a total of £2,572 in 30 patients or £86 per patient were saved. CONCLUSIONS: We found intraoperative cell salvage to be clinically efficacious and cost effective in patients with pelvic acetabular injuries.

The use of blood cell salvage in acetabular fracture internal fixation surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if the routine use of intraoperative blood cell salvage in acetabular fracture internal fixation reduces the need for allogenic blood transfusion, is cost effective, and whether it is influenced by the acetabular fracture pattern. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary pelvic and acetabular reconstructive center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing internal fixation for acetabular fractures. RESULTS: Eighty consecutive patients were reviewed, comprising 26 elementary fracture (EF) and 54 associated fracture (AF) types. The mean volume of autologous blood transfused was 484 mL. The mean volume of 561 mL of autologous blood transfused in patients with AF types was significantly greater than the mean volume of 325 mL transfused in the EF group (P = 0.007). Additional allogenic blood transfusion was required in 5 (19%) patients with EFs and 15 (28%) patients with AFs (P = 0.418). The mean cost of the blood cell salvage and additional blood products in our study was $223 (£135) for all fracture types ($174/£105 for EF and $246/£149 for AF).When treating AF types, the mean cost of using blood cell salvage was $246 (£149) as compared with the mean predicted cost of not using blood cell salvage and transfusing the equivalent of 1.7 units of allogenic blood instead, which was $463 (£281). These distributions are significantly different (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The use of blood cell salvage for internal fixation surgery for acetabular fracture is cost effective, particularly when treating AF types, and its routine use is advocated to limit the need for allogenic blood transfusion.

Clinical and cost effectiveness-related aspects of retransfusion in total hip and knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: An increasing demand for blood products forces the rationalisation of management and conservation of blood. The aim of the study is to evaluate the possibility of retransfusion of blood conservation and the cost-effectiveness of this procedure when employed in Total Hip Replacement and Total Knee Arthroplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study involved two groups of patients. Group I comprised 50 patients who underwent blood retransfusion and in several cases had supplementary allogeneic transfusion. Group II, a control group, consisted of 50 patients who did not receive retransfusion. RESULTS: The retransfusion in Group I enabled the recovery of a mean amount of 364.5 ml (± 52.7) of blood in THR patients and 403.8 ml (± 110.7) in TKA patients. Demand for allogeneic blood transfusions in Group I versus Group II was 46% lower in THR patients and 42% lower in TKA patients. The blood recovered for retransfusion is biologically valuable with regard to cellular elements and plasma chemistries. In the costs evaluation, the total savings in Group I were 5,000 PLN. CONCLUSION: Retransfusion of recuperated blood from postoperative drainage tubing is a simple and safe method that provides clinical and cost-effectiveness advantages.

The economic benefits of cell salvage in obstetric haemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Cell salvage is increasingly used in the management of major obstetric haemorrhage. Its financial considerations were evaluated over a 5-year period. METHOD: Cell salvage was introduced in the Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust in 2006. Data were collected from all cases in which it was set-up and included the volume of blood processed and returned and whether surgery was elective or emergency. RESULTS: Between 1st January 2006 and 30th June 2011, cell salvage for collection was set-up 587 times and blood was returned in 137 patients. Total volume of blood returned was 47143mL, equivalent to 189 units of packed red cells. The return rate was higher for emergency than elective cases (P=0.03). As the use of cell salvage has extended over time to include a greater proportion of patients, return rates have decreased (P<0.0001). The volume of blood returned from cell salvage was significantly related to the estimated blood loss (P<0.00001), with a best fit line described by estimated blood loss=3.45x+454, where x was the volume of blood returned. In 2011 total costs of cell salvage were £9245 for the equivalent of 83 units of blood. At the current price of £125 per unit of allogeneic blood this would have cost £10375: a saving of £1130. No intraoperative or postoperative complications associated with cell salvage were seen. CONCLUSION: The routine use of cell salvage was associated with more salvaged blood being returned to patients, which offset the cost of collection sets when compared to the cost of using allogeneic blood. Cell salvage is an appropriate expenditure to reduce the use of allogeneic blood.