Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 468
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
J Med Econ ; 25(1): 206-211, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35060813

RESUMEN

AIM: National health care expenditures have been increasing each year, although the Japanese government has annually revised official drug prices. Managing the health care system to pay for expensive drugs is a major concern. The reimbursement restriction, which is the only way that a drug can be implemented before market entry in Japan, is crucial for managing expenditures. Therefore, this study identifies the impact of the reimbursement restriction on drug market sales in Japan, particularly in the situation where health technology assessment or other market access regulations are not applicable before market entry. METHOD: All new drugs listed in fiscal years 2011-2019, along with their market size forecast, were identified using the materials from the Central Social Insurance Medical Council. We then calculated the percentage rate of reimbursement amounts based on the National Database of Health Insurance Claims relative to the predicted market size as a dependent variable. Using the reimbursement restriction for each drug as an independent variable, we performed descriptive and univariate analyses on each variable, followed by generalized linear mixed-effects model regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified 211 drugs. The mean rates of drugs that required physicians, facilities, and patients to meet criteria for use were 30.85% (n = 2), 31.42% (n = 2), and 72.11% (n = 6), respectively. The mean rate of drugs that required diagnostic testing was 22.99% (n = 7), which was 3.7 times lower than the rate of drugs that did not require such testing (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the reimbursement restriction requiring diagnostic testing has a substantial impact on decreasing market sales. As the number of cases for each requirement is small, further study is needed to measure the impact of the other reimbursement restrictions.


Asunto(s)
Costos de los Medicamentos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Japón , Programas Nacionales de Salud
3.
PLoS One ; 17(1): e0262211, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35061797

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medical billing errors and fraud have been described as one of the last "great unreduced healthcare costs," with some commentators suggesting measurable average losses from this phenomenon are 7% of total health expenditure. In Australia, it has been estimated that leakage from Medicare caused by non-compliant medical billing may be 10-15% of the scheme's total cost. Despite a growing body of international research, mostly from the U.S, suggesting that rather than deliberately abusing the health financing systems they operate within, medical practitioners may be struggling to understand complex and highly interpretive medical billing rules, there is a lack of research in this area in Australia. The aim of this study was to address this research gap by examining the experiences of medical practitioners through the first qualitative study undertaken in Australia, which may have relevance in multiple jurisdictions. METHOD: This study interviewed 27 specialist and general medical practitioners who claim Medicare reimbursements in their daily practice. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The qualitative data revealed five themes including inadequate induction, poor legal literacy, absence of reliable advice and support, fear and deference, and unmet opportunities for improvement. CONCLUSION: The qualitative data presented in this study suggest Australian medical practitioners are ill-equipped to manage their Medicare compliance obligations, have low levels of legal literacy and desire education, clarity and certainty around complex billing standards and rules. Non-compliant medical billing under Australia's Medicare scheme is a nuanced phenomenon that may be far more complex than previously thought and learnings from this study may offer important insights for other countries seeking solutions to the phenomenon of health system leakage. Strategies to address the barriers and deficiencies identified by participants in this study will require a multi-pronged approach. The data suggest that the current punitive system of ensuring compliance by Australian medical practitioners is not fit for purpose.


Asunto(s)
Actitud , Médicos Generales/psicología , Conocimiento , Percepción , Australia , Fraude , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Entrevistas como Asunto , Programas Nacionales de Salud
4.
JAMA Dermatol ; 157(11): 1355-1358, 2021 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34524396

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Medicare enrollment, dermatologist utilization of Medicare, and dermatologic procedural volume have all increased over time. Despite this, there are limited studies evaluating changes in Medicare reimbursement within dermatology. OBJECTIVE: To identify trends in Medicare reimbursement for 46 common dermatologic procedures from 2007 to 2021. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cross-sectional study, reimbursement data were obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Physician Fee Schedule for commonly used dermatologic Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes from 2007 to 2021. The CPT codes in several major dermatologic categories were analyzed, including skin biopsy, shave removal, benign/premalignant/malignant destruction, benign/malignant excision, Mohs micrographic surgery, simple/intermediate/complex repair, flap, graft, and laser/phototherapy. All procedure prices were adjusted for inflation to January 2021 dollar value. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes were percentage changes and cumulative annual growth rates of pricing for each dermatologic procedure. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2021, there was a mean decrease in dermatologic procedure reimbursement of -4.8% after adjusting for inflation. Mean inflation-adjusted changes in reimbursements during this time period significantly varied by procedure type, including skin biopsy (+30.3%), shave removal (+24.5%), benign/premalignant/malignant destruction (-7.5%), Mohs micrographic surgery (-14.4%), benign/malignant excision (-3.9%), simple/intermediate/complex repair (-9.9%), flap repair (-14.1%), graft repair (-12.0%), and laser/phototherapy (-6.6%; P < .001). Changes in reimbursement did not vary by anatomical risk categories. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this cross-sectional analysis suggest that changes in Medicare reimbursement can have several downstream effects, including concomitant private insurance changes and decreased patient access. Future adjustments in reimbursement should balance high-value care with sustainable pricing to optimize patient access.


Asunto(s)
Medicare , Médicos , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Current Procedural Terminology , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Estados Unidos
5.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 30(7): 105802, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33866272

RESUMEN

While use of telemedicine to guide emergent treatment of ischemic stroke is well established, the COVID-19 pandemic motivated the rapid expansion of care via telemedicine to provide consistent care while reducing patient and provider exposure and preserving personal protective equipment. Temporary changes in re-imbursement, inclusion of home office and patient home environments, and increased access to telehealth technologies by patients, health care staff and health care facilities were key to provide an environment for creative and consistent high-quality stroke care. The continuum of care via telestroke has broadened to include prehospital, inter-facility and intra-facility hospital-based services, stroke telerehabilitation, and ambulatory telestroke. However, disparities in technology access remain a challenge. Preservation of reimbursement and the reduction of regulatory burden that was initiated during the public health emergency will be necessary to maintain expanded patient access to the full complement of telestroke services. Here we outline many of these initiatives and discuss potential opportunities for optimal use of technology in stroke care through and beyond the pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/terapia , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Telemedicina , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/economía , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/economía , Salud Laboral , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/economía , Seguridad del Paciente , Telemedicina/economía
6.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 32(6): 1527-1535, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33827902

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Older patients with advanced CKD are at high risk for serious complications and death, yet few discuss advance care planning (ACP) with their kidney clinicians. Examining barriers and facilitators to ACP among such patients might help identify patient-centered opportunities for improvement. METHODS: In semistructured interviews in March through August 2019 with purposively sampled patients (aged ≥70 years, CKD stages 4-5, nondialysis), care partners, and clinicians at clinics in across the United States, participants described discussions, factors contributing to ACP completion or avoidance, and perceived value of ACP. We used thematic analysis to analyze data. RESULTS: We conducted 68 semistructured interviews with 23 patients, 19 care partners, and 26 clinicians. Only seven of 26 (27%) clinicians routinely discussed ACP. About half of the patients had documented ACP, mostly outside the health care system. We found divergent ACP definitions and perspectives; kidney clinicians largely defined ACP as completion of formal documentation, whereas patients viewed it more holistically, wanting discussions about goals, prognosis, and disease trajectory. Clinicians avoided ACP with patients from minority groups, perceiving cultural or religious barriers. Four themes and subthemes informing variation in decisions to discuss ACP and approaches emerged: (1) role ambiguity and responsibility for ACP, (2) questioning the value of ACP, (3) confronting institutional barriers (time, training, reimbursement, and the electronic medical record, EMR), and (4) consequences of avoiding ACP (disparities in ACP access and overconfidence that patients' wishes are known). CONCLUSIONS: Patients, care partners, and clinicians hold discordant views about the responsibility for discussing ACP and the scope for it. This presents critical barriers to the process, leaving ACP insufficiently discussed with older adults with advanced CKD.


Asunto(s)
Planificación Anticipada de Atención , Comunicación , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Prioridad del Paciente , Rol del Médico , Médicos , Adulto , Planificación Anticipada de Atención/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Cuidadores , Educación Médica , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Entrevistas como Asunto , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupos Minoritarios , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Médicos/economía , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pronóstico , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
7.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 156(4): 559-568, 2021 Sep 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33769453

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Second-opinion pathology review identifies clinically significant diagnostic discrepancies for some patients. Discrepancy rates and laboratory-specific costs in a single health care system for patients referred from regional affiliates to a comprehensive cancer center ("main campus") have not been reported. METHODS: Main campus second-opinion pathology cases for 740 patients from eight affiliated hospitals during 2016 to 2018 were reviewed. Chart review was performed to identify changes in care due to pathology review. To assess costs of pathology interpretation, reimbursement rates for consultation Current Procedural Terminology billing codes were compared with codes that would have been used had the cases originated at the main campus. RESULTS: Diagnostic discrepancies were identified in 104 (14.1%) patients, 30 (4.1%) of which resulted in a change in care. In aggregate, reimbursement for affiliate cases was 65.6% of the reimbursement for the same cases had they originated at the main campus. High-volume organ systems with low relative consultation reimbursement included gynecologic, breast, and thoracic. CONCLUSIONS: Preventable diagnostic errors are reduced by pathology review for patients referred within a single health care system. Although the resulting changes in care potentially lead to overall cost savings, the financial value of referral pathology review could be improved.


Asunto(s)
Errores Diagnósticos/prevención & control , Patología Quirúrgica/economía , Derivación y Consulta/economía , Codificación Clínica , Ahorro de Costo , Errores Diagnósticos/economía , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Patología Quirúrgica/organización & administración , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 21(1): 119-126, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32308058

RESUMEN

Objective: This study aims to provide an up-to-date analysis of the current state of patient access to new drugs in South Korea, focusing on the effect of new review pathways for reimbursement. Methods: We analyzed patients' access to new drugs, listing rate and lead time until listing from marketing authorization. New pathways were defined as 'price negotiation waiver,' 'risk-sharing agreements,' and 'pharmacoeconomic evaluation exemption.' Results: The listing rate for drugs increased after the introduction of the new pathways (93.7% vs. 77.9%, p < 0.001). Before the new pathways, the median lead time for listing was 21.0 months (95% CI: 16.9-25.0), while afterward it was shortened to 10.9 months (95% CI: 10.2-11.7) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Although it has strengthened national health insurance coverage by positively impacting the rate and lead time, the lead time for the oncology and orphan drugs is substantially longer as compared to other drugs. Expanding the eligibility criteria to include non-life-threatening but rare or intractable diseases, and resolving the system's operational issues are still necessary.


Asunto(s)
Aprobación de Drogas , Economía Farmacéutica , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/provisión & distribución , Antineoplásicos/economía , Antineoplásicos/provisión & distribución , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Producción de Medicamentos sin Interés Comercial/economía , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso , República de Corea , Factores de Tiempo
9.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0244759, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33382798

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The Korean National Health Insurance revised its reimbursement criteria to expand coverage for anti-osteoporotic drug treatments in 2011 (expanding diagnostic criteria and the coverage period for anti-osteoporotic therapy) and 2015 (including osteoporotic fracture patients regardless of bone mineral density). We examined whether the two revisions contributed to an increase in the prescription rates of anti-osteoporotic drugs in Korea. METHODS: We used the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service-National Patient Sample data from 2010 through 2016. A segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series was performed to assess changes in the monthly prescription rates of anti-osteoporotic drugs among women aged 50 or older, defined as the proportion of elderly women prescribed with anti-osteoporotic drugs. RESULTS: Both the levels (i.e., abrupt jump or drop) and the trends (i.e., slope) of the prescription rates of anti-osteoporotic drugs in the general population, osteoporotic patients, and osteoporotic fracture patients showed no significant changes after the first revision. However, there was a significant increase in the trends in the general population (ß = 0.0166, p = 0.0173) and in osteoporotic patients (ß = 0.1128, p = 0.0157) after the second revision. Women aged 65 to 79 years were the most significantly increased group in terms of the treatment proportion after the second revision because the trend was significant after the second revision in all three study populations (ß = 0.0300, 0.1212, 0.1392, respectively; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although the two revisions expanded reimbursement coverage, only the second revision on reimbursing based on osteoporotic fracture regardless of bone mineral density was associated with increasing the proportion of post-menopausal women being treated with anti-osteoporotic drugs.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Densidad Ósea , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Osteoporosis/economía , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/economía , Políticas , República de Corea
10.
Health Serv Res ; 55 Suppl 3: 1144-1154, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33284524

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To understand how health systems are facilitating primary care redesign (PCR), examine the PCR initiatives taking place within systems, and identify barriers to this work. STUDY SETTING: A purposive sample of 24 health systems in 4 states. STUDY DESIGN: Data were systematically reviewed to identify how system leaders define and implement initiatives to redesign primary care delivery and identify challenges. Researchers applied codes which were based on the theoretical PCR literature and created new codes to capture emerging themes. Investigators analyzed coded data then produced and applied a thematic analysis to examine how health systems facilitate PCR. DATA COLLECTION: Semi-structured telephone interviews with 162 system executives and physician organization leaders from 24 systems. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Leaders at all 24 health systems described initiatives to redesign the delivery of primary care, but many were in the early stages. Respondents described the use of centralized health system resources to facilitate PCR initiatives, such as regionalized care coordinators, and integrated electronic health records. Team-based care, population management, and care coordination were the most commonly described initiatives to transform primary care delivery. Respondents most often cited improving efficiency and enhancing clinician job satisfaction, as motivating factors for team-based care. Changes in payment and risk assumption as well as community needs were commonly cited motivators for population health management and care coordination. Return on investment and the slower than anticipated rate in moving from fee-for-service to value-based payment were noted by multiple respondents as challenges health systems face in redesigning primary care. CONCLUSIONS: Given their expanding role in health care and the potential to leverage resources, health systems are promising entities to promote the advancement of PCR. Systems demonstrate interest and engagement in this work but face significant challenges in getting to scale until payment models are in alignment with these efforts.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Eficiencia Organizacional , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Motivación , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Gestión de Riesgos/organización & administración
11.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 37: e26, 2020 Dec 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33342447

RESUMEN

This paper describes the reimbursement policy for immune checkpoint inhibitors in Taiwan and provides a perspective to improve the quality, consistency, and transparency of decision making. Global trends for cancer treatment have shifted from chemotherapies to targeted therapies and immuno-oncology (IO) medicine, leading to significant increases in treatment costs. To enhance the accessibility of advanced therapy, the Taiwan National Health Insurance Administration announced two pathways for high-cost medicine: the managed entry agreement and a set of general rules of reimbursement submission for high-cost drugs. To further manage the financial burden on Taiwan's national health insurance system, the policy makers introduced novel inhibitory drugs for cancer immune checkpoints, subject to a maximum annual budget of NT$800 million (≈US$26.7 million). In April 2019, a national registry was established for patients undergoing cancer immunotherapy. Clinical characteristics, treatment duration, toxicity, and the outcome of the postcheckpoint inhibitor treatments were recorded. By analyzing real-world data, we assess the therapeutic effect of IO treatment in Taiwanese patients, thereby enabling payers to adjust payment regulations and rules for reimbursement. The Health Technology Assessment Team plays an important role in drawing upon the evidence to support policy making. Under an implemented cost-management mechanism, Taiwan's high-cost drug policy has enabled patients to access new medicines and maximized patient benefits.


Asunto(s)
Economía Farmacéutica , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/economía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Política Organizacional , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Taiwán , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica
12.
Healthc (Amst) ; 8(4): 100482, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33129179

RESUMEN

Lesson 1: The loosening of federal government regulations enabled the rapid scaling of telehealth, as it enabled providers to be reimbursed for video visits at the same rate as in-person services. Lesson 2: While resistance to change was the norm, the COVID-19 crisis motivated improvements to four major internal operational workflows (scheduling, appointment conversions, patient support and Virtual Rooming Assistants) for video visits, which were met with acceptance by both clinical and non-clinical staff. Lesson 3: Leveraging prior intraorganizational relationships and active collaboration between different stakeholders, helped drive rapid operational change. An ongoing centralized communication and support strategy, ensured all stakeholders were informed and engaged during these uncertain times. Lesson 4: Regular electronic health record (EHR) training and educational material increased end-user knowledge of video visits and helped ensure the visit was safe, medically effective and maintained patient-provider relationships. Lesson 5: A clearly defined intake and evaluation process to filter out technologies that do not integrate with the patient portal or the EHR, ensures operational consistency and long-term sustainability. Lesson 6: Personalized support to patients of different levels of technical literacy with using the preferred patient portal and application, was vital to its use, adoption and overall patient experience.


Asunto(s)
Gestión del Cambio , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Centros Médicos Académicos , COVID-19 , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Pandemias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Telemedicina/economía
13.
J Altern Complement Med ; 26(10): 966-969, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32640831

RESUMEN

Introduction: Complementary health care professionals deliver a substantial component of clinical services in the United States, but insurance coverage for many such services may be inadequate. The objective of this project was to follow up on an earlier single-year study with an evaluation of trends in reimbursement for complementary health care services over a 7-year period. Methods: The authors employed a retrospective serial cross-sectional design to analyze health insurance claims for services provided by licensed acupuncturists, chiropractors, and naturopaths in New Hampshire (NH) from 2011 to 2017. They restricted the analyses to claims in nonemergent outpatient settings for Current Procedural Terminology code 99213, which is one of the most commonly used clinical procedure codes across all specialties. They evaluated by year the likelihood of reimbursement, as compared with primary care physicians as the gold standard. A generalized estimating equation model was used to account for within-person correlations among the separate claim reimbursement indicators for individuals used in the analysis, using an exchangeable working covariance structure among claims for the same individual. Reimbursement was defined as payment >0 dollars. Results: The total number of clinical services claimed was 26,725 for acupuncture, 8317 for naturopathic medicine, 2,539,144 for chiropractic, and 1,860,271 for primary care. Initially, likelihood of reimbursement for naturopathic physicians was higher relative to primary care physicians, but was lower from 2014 onward. Odds of reimbursement for both acupuncture and chiropractic claims remained lower throughout the study period. In 2017, as compared with primary care the likelihood of reimbursement was 77% lower for acupuncturists, 72% lower for chiropractors, and 64% lower for naturopaths. Conclusion: The likelihood of reimbursement for complementary health care services is significantly lower than that for primary care physicians in NH. Lack of insurance coverage may result in reduced patient access to such services.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias/economía , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Honorarios Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/normas , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
14.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 26(7): 901-909, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32584676

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Johns Hopkins Specialty Pharmacy Services recognized the need to identify and develop standardized collection methods for clinical outcome measures (COMs) to demonstrate program quality and value to third-party payers, manufacturers, and internal stakeholders. OBJECTIVE: To define specialty COMs and develop a framework for standardized data collection and reporting. METHODS: COMs for specialty pharmacy disease states (cystic fibrosis; hepatitis C; inflammatory conditions in dermatology, gastroenterology and rheumatology; and multiple sclerosis) were identified through a literature search, collaboration with specialty pharmacists, and committee review. Once identified, these measures were distributed to internal and external stakeholders that included specialty clinic team members, drug manufacturers, and third-party payers for input and validation. A standardized process for discrete documentation and data collection of these measures was implemented using case management software, electronic medical record integration, and informatics support. RESULTS: 28 COMs were identified. The various data sources used to collect the COMs were incorporated into an automated virtual dashboard to allow for regular review and sharing with clinicians, leadership, and other key stakeholders. The virtual dashboard included COMs with data derived from electronic medical records (n = 9), patient-reported outcomes based on responses to pharmacist-delivered questions (n = 11), and pharmacist assessment of outcomes (n = 8). The completed virtual dashboard was further refined to allow for reporting of both population and patient-level outcome results on a quarterly basis. CONCLUSIONS: This project describes methods to standardize documentation, data collection, and reporting of clinical outcomes data for multiple specialty conditions in a health system-integrated specialty pharmacy program. Through literature review and stakeholder consultation, a variety of potential COMs were identified for further evaluation of feasibility and value considering documentation and data collection requirements. Incorporation of COMs into a virtual dashboard will help facilitate the evaluation of program effectiveness, quality improvement planning, and sharing with stakeholders. Additional opportunities exist to further standardize COMs across the pharmacy industry to allow for future benchmarking and standardized evaluation of patient care programs. DISCLOSURES: No funding supported the writing of this article. The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. This study was presented as a poster presentation at the APhA Annual Meeting, March 2018, Nashville, TN, and as a platform presentation at the Eastern States Conference, May 2018, Hershey, PA.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/métodos , Administración del Tratamiento Farmacológico , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/tendencias , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Administración del Tratamiento Farmacológico/tendencias , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/tendencias
15.
Epilepsy Behav ; 111: 107120, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32570201

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The use of medical cannabis to treat drug-resistant epilepsy in children is increasing; however, there has been limited study of the experiences of parents with the current system of accessing medical cannabis for their children. METHODS: In this qualitative study, we used a patient-centered access to care framework to explore the barriers faced by parents of children with drug-resistant epilepsy when trying to access medical cannabis in Canada. We conducted semistructured interviews with 19 parents to elicit their experiences with medical cannabis. We analyzed the data according to five dimensions of access, namely approachability, acceptability, availability, affordability, and appropriateness. RESULTS: Parents sought medical cannabis as a treatment because of a perceived unmet need stemming from the failure of antiepileptic drugs to control their children's seizures. Medical cannabis was viewed as an acceptable treatment, especially compared with adding additional antiepileptic drugs. After learning about medical cannabis from the media, friends and family, or other parents, participants sought authorization for medical use. However, most encountered resistance from their child's neurologist to discuss and/or authorize medical cannabis, and many parents experienced difficulty in obtaining authorization from a member of the child's existing care team, leading them to seek authorization from a cannabis clinic. Participants described spending up to $2000 per month on medical cannabis, and most were frustrated that it was not eligible for reimbursement through public or private insurance programs. CONCLUSIONS: Parents pursue medical cannabis as a treatment for their children's drug-resistant epilepsy because of a perceived unmet need. However, parents encounter barriers in accessing medical cannabis in Canada, and strategies are needed to ensure that children using medical cannabis receive proper care from healthcare professionals with training in epilepsy care, antiepileptic drugs, and medical cannabis.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Refractaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Marihuana Medicinal/uso terapéutico , Padres , Investigación Cualitativa , Adolescente , Adulto , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Anticonvulsivantes/economía , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Canadá/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Epilepsia Refractaria/economía , Epilepsia Refractaria/epidemiología , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/normas , Masculino , Marihuana Medicinal/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad
17.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 46(4 Pt A): 607-612, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31982207

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the costs of CRS and HIPEC and treatment of the related postoperative complications in the public healthcare system. We also aimed to identify the risk factors that increase the cost of CRS and HIPEC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 80 patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC between February 2016 and November 2018 in the Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Olomouc, Czech Republic. Intraoperative factors and postoperative complications were assessed. The treatment cost included the surgery, hospital stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, pharmaceutical charges including medication, hospital supplies, pathology, imaging, and allied healthcare services. RESULTS: The postoperative morbidity rate was 50%, and the mortality rate was 2.5%. The mean length of hospitalisation and ICU admission was 15.44 ± 8.43 and 6.15 ± 4.12 for all 80 patients and 10.73 ± 2.93 and 3.73 ± 1.32, respectively, for 40 patients without complications, and 20.15 ± 13.93 and 8.58 ± 6.92, respectively, for 40 patients with complications. The total treatment cost reached €606,358, but the total reimbursement was €262,931; thus, the CRS and HIPEC profit margin was €-343,427. Multivariate analysis showed that blood loss ≥1.000 ml (p = 0.03) and grade I-V Clavien-Dindo complications (p < 0.001) were independently associated with increased costs. CONCLUSION: The Czech public health insurance system does not fully compensate for the costs of CRS and HIPEC. Hospital losses remain the main limiting factor for further improving these procedures. Furthermore, treatment costs increase with increasing severity of postoperative complications.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/economía , Financiación Gubernamental , Hipertermia Inducida/economía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias del Apéndice/patología , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Costos y Análisis de Costo , República Checa/epidemiología , Diagnóstico por Imagen/economía , Equipos y Suministros de Hospitales/economía , Femenino , Financiación de la Atención de la Salud , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Servicios Farmacéuticos/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología
18.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 65: 100-106, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31678131

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current reimbursement policy surrounding telemedicine has been cited as a barrier for the adaptation of this care model. The objective of this study is to analyze the reimbursement figures for outpatient telemedicine consultation in vascular surgery. METHODS: Patients first underwent synchronous telemedicine visits after receiving point-of-care ultrasound at one of 3 satellite locations of Henry Ford Health System in Michigan. Visit types included new, return, and postoperative patients. Reimbursement information related to payor, adjustment, denial, paid and outstanding balances were recorded for each telemedicine visit. Then, using an enterprise data warehouse, a retrospective analysis was performed for the aforementioned telemedicine visits. The data were analyzed to determine the outcome of total billed charges, number of denied claims, reimbursement per payor, reimbursement per patient, and out-of-pocket costs to the patients. RESULTS: Among 184 virtual clinical encounters, the payors included Aetna US Healthcare, Blue Advantage, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Cofinity Plan, Health Alliance Plan, HAP Medicare Advantage, Humana Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, Medicare, Molina Medicaid HMO, United Healthcare, Blue Care Network, Aetna Better Health of Michigan, Priority Health, and self-pay. Among the 15 payors, reimbursement ranged from 0% to 67% of the total charges billed. Among the 184 virtual visits, a grand total of $22,145 was collected or an average of $120.35 per virtual encounter. The breakdown of charges billed was 40% adjusted, 41% paid by insurance, 10% paid by patient, and 13% denied. There were 27 total denials (15%). Denial of payment included telehealth and nontelehealth reasons, citing noncovered charges, payment included for other prior services, new patient quality not met, and not covered by payor. The average out-of-pocket cost to patients was $12.59 per visit. CONCLUSIONS: These reimbursement data validate the economic potential within this new platform of healthcare delivery. As our experience with the business model grows, we expect to see an increase in reimbursement from private payors and acceptance from patients. Within a tertiary care system, telemedicine for chronic vascular disease has proven to be a viable means to reach a broader population base, and without significant cost to the patients.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Precios de Hospital , Costos de Hospital , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Consulta Remota/economía , Ultrasonografía/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/economía , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Michigan , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 120(1): 134-145.e3, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31353317

RESUMEN

The US health care system has been undergoing substantial changes in reimbursement for medical and nutrition services. These changes have offered opportunities and challenges for registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) to bill for medical nutrition therapy and other nutrition-related services. During the past 10 years, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics has periodically surveyed RDNs providing medical nutrition therapy in ambulatory care settings to learn about their knowledge and patterns of coding, billing, and payment for their services. In 2018, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics conducted the latest iteration of this survey. This article compares the results of the 2008, 2013, and 2018 surveys to examine changes in RDNs' knowledge of billing code use and reimbursement patterns over time; understand the potential influences on coding and billing practices in a changing health care environment; and understand the effects of newer practice settings and care delivery models on billing and reimbursement for medical nutrition therapy services. Results from these surveys demonstrate that during the past 10 years RDNs' knowledge of billing and coding has been stable and very low for RDNs not in supervisory roles or private practice. RDNs reported an increase in providing medical nutrition therapy services to patients with multiple conditions. Since 2013, a dramatic increase was noted in the reported proportion of reimbursement from private/commercial health insurance plans. Results also indicate that most RDNs are not aware of changes in health care payment. Individual RDNs need to understand and be held accountable for the business side of practice and their value proposition in today's health care environment.


Asunto(s)
Codificación Clínica/tendencias , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Terapia Nutricional/tendencias , Nutricionistas/tendencias , Adulto , Dietética/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Conocimiento , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nutricionistas/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
20.
Pediatrics ; 145(1)2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31871247

RESUMEN

A well-implemented and adequately funded medical home not only is the best approach to optimize the health of the individual patient but also can function as an effective instrument for improving population health. Key financing elements to providing quality, effective, comprehensive care in the pediatric medical home include the following: (1) first dollar coverage without deductibles, copays, or other cost-sharing for necessary preventive care services as recommended by Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents; (2) adoption of a uniform definition of medical necessity across payers that embraces services that promote optimal growth and development and prevent, diagnose, and treat the full range of pediatric physical, mental, behavioral, and developmental conditions, in accord with evidence-based science or evidence-informed expert opinion; (3) payment models that promote appropriate use of pediatric primary care and pediatric specialty services and discourage inappropriate, inefficient, or excessive use of medical services; and (4) payment models that strengthen the patient- and family-physician relationship and do not impose additional administrative burdens that will only erode the effectiveness of the medical home. These goals can be met by designing payment models that provide adequate funding of the cost of medical encounters, care coordination, population health services, and quality improvement activities; provide incentives for quality and effectiveness of care; and ease administrative burdens.


Asunto(s)
Cobertura del Seguro/normas , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/normas , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/economía , Pediatría/economía , Niño , Humanos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA