Association Among Dyskinesia of the Lumbar Spine Segment, Inclination Angle of the Lumbosacral Spine, and Low Back Pain in Young Athletes: A Predictive Correlational Study.

OBJECTIVE: This predictive correlational study aimed to investigate the association among low back pain (LBP), dyskinesia of the lumbosacral spine segment (determined by inertial sensors), and inclination angles: the inclination angle of the lumbosacral spine (alpha), the inclination angle of the thoracolumbar spine (beta), and the inclination angle of the upper thoracic section (gamma). Our hypothesis was that young athletes with LBP had a particular dyskinesia: nonphysiological movements of the lumbosacral segment of the spine. METHODS: The study group consisted of 108 young athletes aged 10 to 16 years (male/female 44%/56%; 12.3 ± 1.8 years; 160.1 ± 12.0 cm; 51.1 ± 13.8 kg; 4.3 ± 2.4 training years; 3.7 ± 2.1 training h/wk). The alpha, beta, and gamma angles were measured with a digital inclinometer. The position of the lumbosacral segment at the maximum extension was determined with the inertial sensors, positioned at the 11th thoracic vertebra (T11), the third lumbar spine vertebra (L3), and the second sacral spine vertebra (S2). The data were analyzed using Student's t tests, tetrachoric correlation coefficients, and logistic regression. RESULTS: There was a significant statistical difference in alpha angles (t = 9.4, P < .001) and lumbar positions in extension (t = 6.4, P < .001) between groups with LBP and without LBP. The logistic regression indicated that LBP in young athletes was significantly associated with the increased alpha angle and nonphysiological lumbar position in extension measured by a sensor at the third lumbar spine vertebra. CONCLUSION: There was a strong association among LBP, increased inclination angle of the lumbosacral spine, and dyskinesia of the lumbar spine segment in young athletes.

[Measurement report on the horizontal position relationship between the umbilicus and the 2nd lum- bar spinal process in adults].

The impact factors were explored to determine the horizontal positional relationship between the umbilicus and the 2nd lumbar spinal process in adults and to verify the accuracy of the localization of Shenshu (BL 23) via the umbilicus. The position of the umbilicus and the 2nd lumbar spinal process was measured in 100 participants and the data were analyzed through SPSS 20.0 software. It was found that the umbilicus and the 2nd lumbar process were not positioned horizontally. The positional relationship of these two sites was not apparently correlated with gender, age, body weight, body height, BMI, waistline and discomfort of lumbar region. The umbilicus was commonly and posteriorly projected on the site between the 4th and 5th lumbar vertebra. It is explained that the localization of Shenshu (BL23) via the umbilicus is not accurate.

Anatomical relationship between BL23 and the posterior ramus of the L2 spinal nerve.

BACKGROUND: The acupuncture point BL23 is located in the region of the posterior ramus of the second lumbar spinal nerve (L2) and has historically been used to treat conditions such as lower back pain, pollakiuria, erectile dysfunction, dysmenorrhoea, tinnitus, and vertigo. Some of these treatment effects have been hypothesised to be mediated by the sympathetic nervous system. It was recently discovered that the posterior ramus of the spinal nerve (PRSN) at L2 forms not two but three branches. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between the acupuncture point BL23 and the L2 PRSN in order to consider the pathways possibly affected by BL23 acupuncture. METHODS: Acupuncture needles were inserted through the skin at BL23 to a depth of 3 cm a total of 13 times in eight donor cadavers (seven right-sided, six left-sided). Leaving the needle in place, ventral dissection was performed to determine the PRSN anatomy between the L1 and L3 spinal segments. In four cadavers, the relationship between the L2 spinal nerve and sympathetic branches was additionally evaluated. Following dissection, three-dimensional (3D) data were acquired using a photo scanner and 3D structural images were created using 3D computer graphics software. One additional (female) cadaver was studied without insertion of an acupuncture needle (due to significant scoliosis). RESULTS: The L2 PRSN was divided into medial, intermediate and lateral branches. The needle inserted at BL23 came to lie in the region of the intermediate or lateral branches in all cases. Rami communicantes were found between the L2 spinal nerve and sympathetic trunk with fibres going on to supply the superior hypogastric plexus. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that acupuncture needles inserted at BL23 come into close proximity with the intermediate or lateral branch of the L2 PRSN, which could result in stimulation of both the somatic and sympathetic nervous systems.

[Characteristics of anatomical structures and clinical significance of lumbar Jiaji (EX-B 2) points].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the anatomical structure of Jiaji (EX-B 2) points at the level of lower lumbar region so as to provide evidence for the insertion angle and depth. METHODS: Thirty spine samples of male adults were adopted, and perpendicular insertion of the needle was applied at 3 locations including 1 cun, 0.5 cun and 0.3 cun lateral to the lower border of the spinous process of the lumbar vertebra. The needles were fixed at the local region. Structures and the adjacent major blood vessels and nerves were observed during the anatomy. RESULTS: When the needle was inserted perpendicularly at the point 1 cun lateral to the lower border of the spinous process of the lumber vertebra with the insertion depth of (35.77 +/- 5.86) mm, the zygapophyseal joints, the adjacent osteo-fibrous canal and osteo-fibrous aperture were touched by the tip of the needle, and the medial ramus of dorsal primary ramus of spinal nerve and concomitant vessels were stimulated. Then, needles were inserted perpendicularly 0.5 cun and 0.3 cun lateral to the lower border of the spinous process of the lumber vertebra with the insertion depth of (32.89 +/- 4.79)mm for both. When needle was inserted 0.5 cun lateral, the medial ramus of dorsal primary ramus of spinal nerve and the concomitant vessels were touched by the tip of the needle at where they across the lamina periosteum and erector spinae. When needle was inserted 0.3 cun lateral, the body of the needle reached the terminal branches of the medial ramus of dorsal primary ramus of spinal nerve and the concomitant vessels through the deep paraspinal muscles and the thoracolumbar fascia. CONCLUSION: The medial ramus of dorsal primary ramus of lumbar spinal nerve and concomitant vessels distributed at the region 1 cun, 0.5 cun and 0.3 cun beside the lower border of each lumbar spinous process. Therefore, the location of Jiaji (EX-B 2) points can be considered in the region from 0.3 cun to 1 cun beside the lower border of each spinous process.

Ultrasound-guided caudad epidural access for the lumbosacral neurostimulation: case report and technical note.

OBJECTIVES: This is a case report and description of a new ultrasound-guided caudad epidural needle placement for percutaneous stimulation of the lumbosacral roots. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: Using ultrasonography pertinent spinal and neuroaxial anatomy was visualized. In-plane approach with continuous monitoring of the needle advancement was utilized. The needle was seamlessly placed in the epidural space on the first attempt. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal sonography is a promising imaging method to facilitate percutaneous caudad epidural access.

A low-cost ultrasound phantom of the lumbosacral spine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This report describes the production of a low-cost ultrasound phantom of the lumbosacral spine. The phantom should be a very useful tool to teach the basic skills for ultrasound-guided procedures of the lumbosacral spine. METHODS: A lumbosacral spine model is secured to the bottom of a microwave-safe container and is immersed in a concentrated gelatin solution. After the gelatin hardens, the model can be used for scanning practice as well as needle placement. The phantom can be recovered after use by melting the gelatin in a microwave to "erase" any needle track marks. RESULTS: A transparent and durable gelatin block is produced. This allows trainees to have direct visual access to the lumbosacral spine model to correlate with the ultrasound images as well as to confirm proper needle placement. Disadvantages of the model include lack of simulated soft tissue structures and an absence of simulated haptic feedback during needle placement. Metamucil can be added to the gelatin to simulate the appearance of soft tissue, although this increases the opacity and thus decreases the visual access of the gelatin. CONCLUSIONS: This teaching tool can provide trainees with an opportunity to familiarize themselves with sonoanatomy of the lumbosacral spine in addition to practicing probe handling techniques and needle placement.

The presacral space and its impact on sacral neuromodulator implantation.

PURPOSE: We describe the presacral space and its potential impact on sacral neuromodulator implantation and bowel injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Parasagittal images containing bilateral sacral foramina (S2-S4) were examined on 45 pelvic magnetic resonance images. Images were excluded from analysis if they were poor quality or had any history causing distortion of normal anatomy. We measured the natural angle between the foramina and the dorsal skin to approximate the needle angulation during neuromodulator electrode placement. Using these angles we measured the distance from the skin to any bowel (D1), the skin to the dorsal sacrum (D2) and then calculated the distance from the dorsal sacrum to any bowel (D3). RESULTS: Mean subject age was 45 years (range 19 to 78) and body mass index was 27.9 kg/m(2) (range 18.6 to 56.2). At S3 the mean foraminal angle and D3 were 46 +/- 8.4 degrees and 27.4 +/- 11.7 mm, respectively. Increasing age was moderately correlated to widening D3 at each foramina (r = 0.3, Pearson's p <0.05). Body mass index did not consistently vary with D3 at any foramina. CONCLUSIONS: Our measurements suggest that the presacral space can be expected to be approximately 27 mm at the level of S3 where the neuromodulator electrode is implanted. It is possible to encounter bowel while performing this implantation using standard techniques and equipment. We recommend the standard use of fluoroscopy during placement.

Between-day repeatability and symmetry of multifidus cross-sectional area measured using ultrasound imaging.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective test-retest, intrarater reliability study. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the intrarater reliability, asymmetry, and associated error with measurement of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the bilateral S1 multifidi when measured by a physical therapist following a short course of self-directed training in ultrasound imaging. BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in the assessment of the lumbar multifidus during the recovery from low back injury. It is important to know the error associated with the CSA measurements obtained by a physical therapist with limited experience in ultrasound imaging when using a portable unit. METHODS AND MEASURES: Thirty healthy females (mean +/- SD age, 23 +/- 2 years; mean +/- SD mass, 63.1 +/- 9.2 kg; mean +/- SD height, 1.63 +/- 0.06 m) participated. Fourteen subjects returned within 1 to 4 days for repeated measurements. RESULTS: For all 30 subjects, the average (+/- SD) CSA of the left S1 multifidus (4.18 +/- 0.55 cm2) was larger (P<.05) than the right (4.11 +/- 0.57 cm2), with a standard error of the measurement (SEM) of 0.13 cm2 and average +/- SD asymmetry of 3.5% +/- 3.4%. For a subset of 14 subjects, the between-day intrarater reliability for the right S1 multifidus muscle was ICC3,1 = 0.80 (95% CI, 0.49-0.93), while the ICC for the left side was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.34-0.90). The day-to-day average differences for the left and right side were 0.02 cm2 and 0.04 cm2, respectively. For the most conservative estimate, the between-day SEM was 0.37cm2. CONCLUSIONS: A physical therapist, newly trained in ultrasound imaging, obtained reasonable between-day intrarater reliability when imaging the S1 multifidus. A high degree of symmetry was found between the bilateral S1 multifidi in a sample of healthy subjects, which is consistent with previous reports from measurements by skilled ultrasonographers.

Sources of variation in spinal indentation testing: indentation site relocation, intraabdominal pressure, subject movement, muscular response, and stiffness estimation.

BACKGROUND: Force-displacement properties of spinal tissues assessed by blunt indentation are thought to have clinical relevance; however, numerous variables with respect to spinal indentation have yet to be identified or characterized completely. OBJECTIVE: To identify and quantify, where possible, previously unidentified or incompletely characterized variables with respect to spinal indentation. DESIGN: Multiprotocol design. METHODS: Four experiments were performed: (1) Twelve asymptomatic subjects were indented with concurrent electromyography during conditions of rest, held inspiration, increased intraabdominal pressure and lumbar extension. (2) Changes in the recumbent position of 12 subjects were measured while a series of movements was performed in restrained and unrestrained conditions. (3) Ten clinicians attempted to locate, and to relocate, a subcutaneous anatomical landmark through visualization/palpation and ultrasonic imaging. (4) Performances of 3 methods of force-displacement curve modeling were compared with respect to stiffness estimation. RESULTS: (1) Spinal stiffness increased significantly in a minority of subjects awaiting indentation and in a majority of subjects during increases in intraabdominal pressure. (2) Changes in subject position were significantly reduced by a restraint system. (3) With respect to interclinician error in locating and relocating an indentation site, there was significant improvement with the use of ultrasonic visualization. (4) The error associated with linear techniques used to model curvilinear force-displacement data plots increased with increasing linear intervals. CONCLUSION: Several sources of variation in spinal indentation were identified: indentation site relocation, intraabdominal pressure, subject movement, muscular response, and stiffness estimation. These variables, which have been unaccounted for in previous indentation studies, might be responsible for the change or lack of change in force-displacement properties between preintervention and postintervention indentation trials.

Inter-examiner and intra-examiner agreement for assessing sacroiliac anatomical landmarks using palpation and observation: pilot study.

Despite the paucity of research into the reliability of static palpation, it is still employed extensively as a diagnostic tool by manual medicine practitioners. This study tested the inter- and intra-examiner agreement of ten senior osteopathic students using static palpation on ten asymptomatic subjects. Four assessments of the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS), sacral sulcus (SS), and the sacral inferior lateral angle (SILA) on every subject by all examiners resulted in 1200 assessments in total. Kappa (Kg) yielded intra-examiner agreement that ranged between less-than-chance to substantial for the SILA (Kg=-0.05 to 0.69; mean Kg=0.21), and slight to moderate for the PSIS (Kg=0.07 to 0.58; mean Kg=0.33) and the SS (Kg=0.02 to Kg=0.60; mean Kg=0.24), with 50% significant beyond the 0.05 level. Inter-examiner agreement was slight (PSIS Kg=0.04; SILA Kg=0.08; SS Kg=0.07) and significant at the 0.01 level. Intra-examiner agreement was greater than inter-examiner agreement, which was consistent with existing palpation reliability studies. The poor reliability of clinical tests involving palpation may be partially explained by error in landmark location.