Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(13): e25357, 2021 Apr 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33787638

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Total ear amputation is a relatively rare trauma with an absolute indication for surgical treatment. Numerous techniques for auricular reconstruction have been described. When local and general conditions allow microsurgical replantation, this must be the first choice. We propose the association of microsurgical techniques with some modification (modified Baudet technique) to obtain higher survival rate of the reimplanted stump. METHODS: This study included cases of 3 male patients with total ear amputation, the injuries and their mechanism (workplace accident) being identical. Chief complaints were pain, bleeding, important emotional impact due by an unaesthetic appearance. The established diagnosis was traumatic complete ear amputation (grade IV auricular injury according to Weerda classification). Microsurgical replantation was performed only with arteriorraphy, and no vein anastomosis. Cartilage incisions and skin excisions were made to enlarge the cartilage-recipient site contact area. Medicinal leeches were used to treat venous congestion, to which systemic anticoagulant therapy was added. RESULTS: The results showed the survival of the entire replanted segment in all cases, with good function and esthetical appearance. Patients were fully satisfied with the final outcome. CONCLUSION: Microsurgical replantation is the gold standard, for the surgical treatment of total ear amputation. We believe that cartilage incisions and the increased surface of contact between cartilage and recipient site has an adjuvant role in revascularization of the amputated stump (with only arterial anastomosis) and the use of hirudotherapy helps to relieve early venous congestion.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Traumática/cirugía , Arterias/cirugía , Oído Externo/cirugía , Microcirugia/métodos , Reimplantación/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Animales , Oído Externo/irrigación sanguínea , Oído Externo/lesiones , Estética , Hirudo medicinalis , Humanos , Hiperemia/etiología , Hiperemia/prevención & control , Aplicación de Sanguijuelas/métodos , Masculino , Microcirugia/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Reimplantación/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos
2.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 21(2): 158-160, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31556841

RESUMEN

Background: Infections with Aeromonas spp. are a recognized complication of leech therapy for circulatory complications in replanted digits. Ciprofloxacin is commonly used empirically for Aeromonas coverage in such cases. Evolving resistance patterns of Aeromonas should be considered in designing an antibiotic strategy. Methods: Three consecutive patients with complicated replantations had site cultures yielding Aeromonas isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin. These cultures were analyzed to identify effective antibiotic agents. Results: Each Aeromonas isolate, and each additional site organism, was sensitive to cefepime. Conclusion: Our routine antibiotic coverage for leech application has been changed to cefepime. Aeromonas sensitivities and resistances should be monitored to adapt to future changes in appropriate antibiotics.


Asunto(s)
Aeromonas/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana/efectos de los fármacos , Aplicación de Sanguijuelas/métodos , Reimplantación/métodos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefepima/farmacología , Cefepima/uso terapéutico , Ciprofloxacina/farmacología , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Aplicación de Sanguijuelas/efectos adversos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Reimplantación/efectos adversos
3.
Microsurgery ; 39(3): 200-206, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30496615

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The success of salvage procedures for failing digital replants (FR) is poorly documented. We sought to evaluate the success of salvage procedures for FR and factors contributing to successes and failures of replants. METHODS: Adult patients who presented to our center between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2015, suffered ≥1 digital amputation(s), and underwent digital replantation were included. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative details were recorded. Digits were monitored postoperatively via nursing and physician assessments. The presumed reason for failure, details, and outcomes of salvage attempts were recorded for FR. Length of hospital stay and complications were also recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients and 83 digits were included. Fifty-two digits (63%) were compromised (arterial ischemia in 15 digits; venous congestion in 37 digits) and 48 digits had salvage therapy. Twenty-one FR (44%) were salvaged via operative (1 of 2; 50%), nonoperative (19 of 43; 44%), and combined (1 of 3; 33%) therapies. FR patients were more likely than those with successful replants to receive a blood transfusion (52 vs. 23%; p = .009) with more transfused units (3.45 ± 3.30 vs. 0.86 ± 0.95; p = .001). Length of stay was prolonged for FR patients (9 [range: 2-22] vs. 7 [range: 3-19] days; p = .039). Ultimately, 59% (49 of 83) of replants were successful, where 25% (21 of 83) were successfully salvaged. CONCLUSION: Nonoperative and operative salvage therapies improve the rate of replant survival. We suggest close postoperative monitoring of all replants and active salvage interventions for compromised replants in the postoperative period.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Traumática/rehabilitación , Traumatismos de los Dedos/cirugía , Dedos/irrigación sanguínea , Isquemia/rehabilitación , Microcirugia/efectos adversos , Microcirugia/rehabilitación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/rehabilitación , Reimplantación/efectos adversos , Reimplantación/rehabilitación , Adulto , Amputación Traumática/cirugía , Transfusión Sanguínea , Femenino , Dedos/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Heparina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hiperemia/etiología , Hiperemia/cirugía , Hiperemia/terapia , Isquemia/etiología , Isquemia/cirugía , Isquemia/terapia , Aplicación de Sanguijuelas/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Perioperatorio , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Atención Terciaria de Salud
5.
Microsurgery ; 31(4): 281-7, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21520265

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are case reports and small series in the literature relating to the use of medicinal leeches by plastic surgeons; however, larger series from individual units are rare. The aim of this article is to present a comprehensive 4-year case series of the use of medicinal leeches, discuss the current evidence regarding indications, risks, and benefits and highlight the recent updates regarding leech speciation. METHODS: Patients prescribed leeches in a 4-year period (July 2004-2008) were collated from hospital pharmacy records (N = 35). The number of leeches used, demographic, clinical, and microbiological details were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were treated with leeches. The age range was 2 to 98 years (mean = 49.3). Leeches were most commonly used for venous congestion in pedicled flaps and replantations. Blood transfusions were necessary in 12 cases (34%) [mean = 2.8 units, range 2-5 units]. Our infection rate was 20% (7/35) including five infections with Aeromonas spp. (14.2%). The proportion of patients becoming infected after leech therapy was significantly greater in the group of patients that did not receive prophylactic antibiotic treatment (Fisher's Exact test P = 0.0005). In total, 14 cases (40%) were salvaged in entirety, in 7 cases 80% or more, in 2 cases 50 to 79%, and in 1 case less than 50% of the tissues were salvaged. In 11 cases (31%), the tissues were totally lost. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights both the benefits and the risks to patients in selected clinical situations and also the potential risks. The routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis is supported. In view of the emerging evidence that Hirudo verbana are now used as standard leech therapy, and the primary pathogen is Aeromonas veronii, until a large prospective multicenter study is published, large series of patients treated with leeches should be reported.


Asunto(s)
Aplicación de Sanguijuelas , Insuficiencia Venosa/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Animales , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Aplicación de Sanguijuelas/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reimplantación/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/irrigación sanguínea , Insuficiencia Venosa/etiología , Adulto Joven
6.
Microsurgery ; 28(3): 153-6, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18286649

RESUMEN

We describe a case of complete guillotine-type penile amputation at the proximal penile shaft. The blood flow was established 10 h after trauma. Circulation in the replanted penis was quite good but there was progressive prepuce necrosis after the hematoma. Cosmetic and urinary outcome was good 6 weeks later. The repair of deep dorsal penile vessels helps in corpus tissue healing and glans circulation. The blood supply from the corpus tissue is sufficient for the survival of the replanted penis even when the repaired dorsal vessels were occluded. Surgical pitfalls in replantation procedures and complication management are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Traumática/cirugía , Pene/cirugía , Reimplantación/efectos adversos , Reimplantación/métodos , Adulto , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Masculino , Necrosis , Pene/lesiones , Pene/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control
8.
Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg ; 9(2): 122-3, 2005 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16201255

RESUMEN

The most common problem after finger replantation is congestion because of insufficient venous drainage. A simple method--milking technique--is described as an additional method for the treatment of venous congestion.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de los Dedos/terapia , Masaje/métodos , Reimplantación/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Venosa/terapia , Traumatismos de los Dedos/cirugía , Humanos , Insuficiencia Venosa/etiología
9.
Nurs Times ; 100(41): 40-2, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15517735

RESUMEN

Digits amputated through trauma can often be replanted and regain function. Success depends on preoperative care of the digit and minimising the time the digit is without blood supply. Long-term patient compliance with postoperative care and therapy is necessary to maximise postoperative functioning.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Traumática/cirugía , Traumatismos de los Dedos/cirugía , Atención Perioperativa/enfermería , Reimplantación/enfermería , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Aplicación de Sanguijuelas , Alta del Paciente , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Reimplantación/efectos adversos , Reimplantación/métodos
10.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) ; 26(8): 528-32, 1997 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9267551

RESUMEN

Although medicinal bloodletting with leeches is a practice that dates back 3500 years, leeches have been used in reconstructive surgery for only the past 35 years. In this article, the indications, mechanisms of action, and guidelines for using leeches in reconstructive surgery are reviewed.


Asunto(s)
Edema/terapia , Sanguijuelas , Reimplantación/efectos adversos , Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Animales , Coagulación Sanguínea/fisiología , Protocolos Clínicos , Edema/etiología , Humanos , Selección de Paciente , Saliva/química
11.
AORN J ; 62(3): 364-6, 369, 371-2, passim, 1995 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8534055

RESUMEN

This article presents a protocol for the perioperative care of patients undergoing digital replantation, which is the most common microsurgical procedure performed today. Venous congestion, a common complication of digital replantation, often has been treated through surgical exploration and creation of arteriovenous anastomosis. Leech therapy, however, is experiencing a resurgence among surgeons as an alternative method for treating venous congestion. This article discusses the anatomical, physiological, and clinical indications and methods of leech therapy in digital replantation.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de los Dedos/cirugía , Dedos , Sanguijuelas , Enfermería Perioperatoria/métodos , Reimplantación , Insuficiencia Venosa/terapia , Amputación Traumática/fisiopatología , Amputación Traumática/cirugía , Animales , Dedos/irrigación sanguínea , Humanos , Reimplantación/efectos adversos , Reimplantación/enfermería
12.
Microsurgery ; 14(3): 183-6, 1993.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8479316

RESUMEN

The treatment modality of choice for venous insufficiency after free tissue transfer or replantation remains surgical repair. When this is not technically possible, the use of medical leeches is a useful adjunct to treatment. This paper reviews the history of the use of leeches in medicine, the anatomy and physiology of Hirudo medicinalis, the techniques of leech therapy, and the complications and contraindications.


Asunto(s)
Sanguijuelas , Microcirugia , Adulto , Amputación Traumática/cirugía , Animales , Traumatismos de los Dedos/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Reimplantación/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Venosa/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA